 |
 |
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
|
|||
 |
|||
|
|||
 |
|||
|
2 Billion May Suffer from Cell Phone Cancer by 2020
- Text size
ANI/Business Wire India
June 22, 2008
|
|
 |
|
| The fatal and volumetric effects of electromagnetic radiation is emitted mainly by mobile phones, mobile phone antenna, tower, mast, transmission tower, microwave oven, wireless devices, system and equipment. | |
|
NEW DELHI: The studies and survey conducted by Australian Health Research Institute indicates that due to billions of times more in volume electromagnetic radiation emitted by billions of mobile phones, internet, intranet and wireless communication data transmission will make almost one-third of world population (about two billions) patient of ear, eye and brain cancer beside other major body disorders like heart ailments, impotency, migraine, epilepsy.
According to the reports the tissues of children are tender and are likely to be more effected by use of any wireless gadget and devices and they should not be encouraged to use mobile phone.
The fatal and volumetric effects of electromagnetic radiation emitted mainly by mobile phones, mobile phone antenna, tower, mast, transmission tower, microwave oven, wireless devices, system and equipment.
These dangerous effects have been certified and confirmed repeatedly by many leading medical and scientific research institutions of the world including Ministries of health of various governments, W.H.O. and now have been admitted and confirmed by Govt. of India in their recent press releases.
The attached image shows and proves about the serious ill effects of E.M. radiation released by Radiation Nuclear and Safety Authority of FINLAND as to how E.M. radiation emitted by mobile phones damages the various body cells and causes incurable and fatal diseases.
| WATCH ALEX JONES’ ENDGAME ONLINE NOW in its entirety. View more High quality trailers at www.endgamethemovie.com |
-
- Social bookmarks
- Email this article
-
- Print this page
- Share on Twitter
June 22nd, 2008 at 11:37 am
Superb article that people need to know about
June 22nd, 2008 at 11:40 am
Be nice if one could post more than once here without getting an IP tagged and blocked
June 22nd, 2008 at 11:41 am
This i also found interesting
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eVo2maA7h1E
June 22nd, 2008 at 11:44 am
Maybe when we try to comment on this “one”….I pray to God they listen. But I think we have too many people believing a phone is a status toy and will never give it up.
June 22nd, 2008 at 11:50 am
I dont use a cell phone because I heard about this a few years ago. I dont eat microwave food either because I heard the guy that invented it talk about them. He dosent have one either. That food there will break down your immune system because it kills the proteins your body needs to keep healthy. then I heard two scientists at the hanford nuclear station in Wa. state did a test to prove what he was saying. If you use a lap top dont set it on your lap when you use it.
June 22nd, 2008 at 11:50 am
By Geoffrey Lean
Sunday, 30 March 2008
Related Articles
* Phone-reliant Britons in the grip of ‘nomo-phobia’
* Print Print
* Email Email
Search Search Go
Independent.co.uk Web
Bookmark & Share
* Digg It
* del.icio.us
* Facebook
* Stumbleupon
What are these?
Change font size: A | A | A
Mobile phones could kill far more people than smoking or asbestos, a study by an award-winning cancer expert has concluded. He says people should avoid using them wherever possible and that governments and the mobile phone industry must take “immediate steps” to reduce exposure to their radiation.
The study, by Dr Vini Khurana, is the most devastating indictment yet published of the health risks.
It draws on growing evidence – exclusively reported in the IoS in October – that using handsets for 10 years or more can double the risk of brain cancer. Cancers take at least a decade to develop, invalidating official safety assurances based on earlier studies which included few, if any, people who had used the phones for that long.
Earlier this year, the French government warned against the use of mobile phones, especially by children. Germany also advises its people to minimise handset use, and the European Environment Agency has called for exposures to be reduced.
Professor Khurana – a top neurosurgeon who has received 14 awards over the past 16 years, has published more than three dozen scientific papers – reviewed more than 100 studies on the effects of mobile phones. He has put the results on a brain surgery website, and a paper based on the research is currently being peer-reviewed for publication in a scientific journal.
He admits that mobiles can save lives in emergencies, but concludes that “there is a significant and increasing body of evidence for a link between mobile phone usage and certain brain tumours”. He believes this will be “definitively proven” in the next decade.
Noting that malignant brain tumours represent “a life-ending diagnosis”, he adds: “We are currently experiencing a reactively unchecked and dangerous situation.” He fears that “unless the industry and governments take immediate and decisive steps”, the incidence of malignant brain tumours and associated death rate will be observed to rise globally within a decade from now, by which time it may be far too late to intervene medically.
“It is anticipated that this danger has far broader public health ramifications than asbestos and smoking,” says Professor Khurana, who told the IoS his assessment is partly based on the fact that three billion people now use the phones worldwide, three times as many as smoke. Smoking kills some five million worldwide each year, and exposure to asbestos is responsible for as many deaths in Britain as road accidents.
Late last week, the Mobile Operators Association dismissed Khurana’s study as “a selective discussion of scientific literature by one individual”. It believes he “does not present a balanced analysis” of the published science, and “reaches opposite conclusions to the WHO and more than 30 other independent expert scientific reviews”.
June 22nd, 2008 at 11:52 am
Well, I admit I’m pretty leary of cell phones and their potential for causing cancer, however, I just came from a week long conference with dozens of detailed presentations of very scientific studies on this topic and only 1 presentation was able to show any connection between cell phone use and brain cancer (or related nearby cancers)… this was from a Swedish doctor and it was an excellent and detailed study. The general concensus of the conference was that we need more long term studies… > 10 years of cell phone use…and we are only now getting to the point where we have a population with that long of cell phone use and from which we can gather stats. I’m still leary of cell phones, but I’m not convinced one way or the other yet, despite the article on this website. Disclaimer: I am not in the cell phone industry or any related industry… just a concerned citizen.
June 22nd, 2008 at 11:53 am
Don’t worry folks. Their such ‘alarmists’ at this website.
By 2020 your loving government will provide a ‘mandatory’ vaccine for you to take that will ‘rebuild’ your brain and it will work like a hand in glove with that mandatory brain chip your ‘friendly knowledgable’ medical professional will ‘provide’ you.
June 22nd, 2008 at 11:56 am
Heres even more proof….
http://proliberty.com/observer/20080508.htm
June 22nd, 2008 at 12:00 pm
Check out http://www.documentarywire.com to watch 100s of documentaries for free!
June 22nd, 2008 at 12:06 pm
ipcheck – there is no IP blocking here. The comments take 30 minutes to appear. This is because of heavy traffic that often takes down the server. either we struggle with server issues continually or you have to wait to see your message. we have decided on the latter.
June 22nd, 2008 at 12:34 pm
I think manufacturers should address these issues immediately, otherwise be subject to future product liability lawsuits. There has to be some new industry safety standards they could create. Some kind of filters, fields or something to keep the radiation inside the phones.
June 22nd, 2008 at 12:36 pm
But… but they are so shiny and expensive and now I am always “in-touch” ect..
How many people do you that have said “they cannot live without” their little port-a-brain?
Glad I got rid of mine.
June 22nd, 2008 at 12:38 pm
What about the hands free device this article does not mention nor does anyone else. This piece fits around the ear, is small , and is cool after long use. It may not be completely safe, but I’ll wager it could take 3 times as long for a cancer risk. Well before that, I would stop using even the hands free and return to conventional telephone. Everyone be careful: even cordless telephones may not be completely safe.
June 22nd, 2008 at 12:52 pm
Gabe,
That’s not how cellular communication works. The RF radiation is what carries your signal to the tower or antenna. You think the phones kick out radiation, climb an active tower once and get yourself some microwaves. It will blister your skin in minutes on some of the larger towers, especially those with Federal communications. The shits everywhere traveling through the air much like frequencies on your am/fm radio. Even if you don’t use a cell phone your getting exposed in small amounts everyday of your life.
June 22nd, 2008 at 12:57 pm
Gabriel, (#12)
If you keep the radiation inside the phones…..they would require wires! The radiation is what makes the wireless/mobile phones.
June 22nd, 2008 at 1:26 pm
well…considering the tsunami warning that came with the flood of cell phones deposited onto the markets in the 90’s…this should come as no shock. They warned of brain cancer…they warned of repeated exposure of an antenna near the brain….they warned of the waves…we all stood by as cell phone towers were planted in church steeples and ontop of schools.
we were all warned numerous times throughout the decade, by numerous sources…and we still proceeded to carry on with our cell phone madness.
if you need to have one…atleast keep your conversations short.
personally I think the cell phone craze was the “beta testing” for the embedded microchips that are coming.
June 22nd, 2008 at 1:27 pm
It would be honest to mention that the DU-ammo
used by the American troops causes all types of cancer as well, and including leukemia.
Radio active particles are higher than ever present in the air we breathe. But who cares? We’re winning both wars!!
June 22nd, 2008 at 1:28 pm
Well it’s not as fast as a “work / re-education center” but it is cleaner and the monkeys will do it to themselves all while it allows us to increase the available work hours and reach of a global network…and they can take dirty pics!
June 22nd, 2008 at 1:32 pm
The same folks who complain about chemtrails, fluoride, cell phone radiation, and rBST, are the same ones who still live in the 1950’s thinking secondhand cigarette smoke is a choice. I had a run-in with addicts on the NYC smokers’ tax forum the other day on infowars and I thought that they were funny.
June 22nd, 2008 at 1:52 pm
Just what I need . I am a heavy user of cell phones , 3,000 minutes is a normal month and now I am at risk for cancer . I will now add the cell phone companies to my cancer list .
June 22nd, 2008 at 1:53 pm
Ask Ted Kennedy if cell phones are dangerous. He was a frequent user and is likely to be dead in less than a year from now, according to many top doctors who spoke to the media in the wake of his recent diagnosis a particular type of brain tumor linked directly to cell phone use.
The cell phone industry and the globalist eugenics agenda behind it are deliberately making these mass killer devices cheap and commonly available, not unlike tobacco, knowing full well what will be the mass genocide consequences. It is all being done by design, not by accident.
Also note how they have injected extensive, irritating and highly unnecessary cell phone use into most mass audience movies and tv shows today as well, in a sleazy ploy to manipulate everyone into using these things as much as possible.
Cell phones were not developed to help anyone. They were put in place to ultimately destroy billions of human lives, while sold in the bogus sheepskin of a handy, affordable, seemingly harmless device so nearly everyone would jump on board and become a habitual user asap.
The shameless cell phone industry, health care establishment and even our lap-dog, paid off congress is purposely glossing over these well known fatal truths and going to the ends of the earth to hide them from the unsuspecting public.
Lastly, in a curious but eye bugging irony Ted Kennedy personally became a now terminal victim of the same pro cell phone use policies he helped put in place, in part if only by silence and sheer stupidity on the floor of capital hill.
At minimum as best I recall, Kennedy never spoke out against cell phone use and their hidden but known dangers to kill people much less the globalist establishment behind it with it’s own sick agenda.
Payback is a bitch, … huh Ted? And even currently facing a tragic certain untimely death but still a functioning member of the US senate for the moment he remains conspicuously silent on both subjects regardless.
June 22nd, 2008 at 1:57 pm
We like to make sure nobody posts a comment that could undermine alex’s credability, especially as our appointed agent for giving you guys news. To ensure we keep your focus on alex we have to filter your postings for material that slanders or tarnishes alex’s reputaion or questions his authority as the peoples news agent.
June 22nd, 2008 at 1:59 pm
This is NOT by accident. THis is by design.
June 22nd, 2008 at 2:16 pm
just don’t put the cell phone near your ear, use a bluetooth or headphones. Or use speakerphone.
June 22nd, 2008 at 2:17 pm
do you guys seriously think that cell phones were designed, manufactured and sold with the purpose of giving people cancer, and that it’s a form of population control?
a simple yes, or no, please.
June 22nd, 2008 at 2:22 pm
@ user: evil intent
nice name. do you listen to the group, Evol Intent?
and @ mod/admin… was that last comment serious? you’re moderating the comments to make sure no one says anything bad about alex jones? that was a joke….. right?
June 22nd, 2008 at 2:27 pm
Check out BioPro Cell Chips!
I have one on my cell phone. It harmonizes the electro-magnetic radiation emitted by cell phones.
My phone has Not gotten even hot in the last 4 months that I’ve had a cell chip on my phone.
Tons of validation and studies on the website!
http://www.mybiopro.com/saveyourselftoday
June 22nd, 2008 at 2:27 pm
I found this http://www.express.co.uk/posts.....one-masts-
June 22nd, 2008 at 2:34 pm
I hate cell phones, always made me feel ill to be near them.
June 22nd, 2008 at 2:36 pm
“Talking 500 mins. per month on a cell phone increases the probability of brain cancer by 140%”!
-Source: Wireless Technology Research
http://www.MyBioPro.com/SaveYourselfToday
June 22nd, 2008 at 2:40 pm
Balasz:
YES.
June 22nd, 2008 at 2:52 pm
Bluetooths and headsets won’t help they als emit electromagnetic radiation. Try BioPro chips.
June 22nd, 2008 at 3:21 pm
How much electro-magnetic radiation does a nuclear war emit? We’ll be able to answer that question at the end of 2008.
June 22nd, 2008 at 3:21 pm
test
June 22nd, 2008 at 3:24 pm
Can you hear me now?
June 22nd, 2008 at 3:30 pm
Over ten years ago a Swedish neurosurgion shows the increase of braintumors in the hearing cortex because of cellphone radiation.
Since then the mainstream media never ever talked about it (ofcourse), they even said that programs like that would harm the industry (economy prior to human life)
June 22nd, 2008 at 3:34 pm
Good evening, the big insurrance companies like loyd in london refuses to cover the telephon corporations for health risks.
,bye bye
i don’t need others ” studies”
June 22nd, 2008 at 3:37 pm
Is there anyone here who actually understands this issue? I have done significant research, and can tell you that yes, there exists the possibility of damage being caused by EM transmissions. But guess what – these EM transmissions are also caused by every form of electricity as well as the sun, and don’t listen to anyone who tells you that they are so different. The thing about cell phones is that they are always held like an inch away from your head. Gradually, damage could accumulate. There is reason to believe this causes higher levels of what are called “Free Radicals”, those same things the antioxidants often be put in food are supposed to destroy. (and they do, in test tubes, but… you know the rest.) So, EM transmissions only cause these free radicals, which could be called mischievous at worst. Yes, they are probably the largest cause of genetic breakdown, which can cause all sorts of things, (and, indeed cancer) but if you have a healthy body, don’t eat all sorts of crappy food, you probably don’t need to worry, as long as you don’t spend a really long time near a large source of EM transmissions. A healthy body does not need to worry about non-ionizing radiation.
At least regular cells – a laptop with a wireless card to close to the body would probably damage sperm, as sperm needs to be perfect to succeed. There is no conspiracy here; it was considered that those signals were sent through another dimension!
Please don’t say that I have been bought off, or anything like that – I’m Canadian, and know the government is totally corrupt. But please, the largest cause of health problems is processed food. And the cheapness of cellphones is due to us being a consumerist society. We blame other things because we can’t make ourselves stop eating our Twinkies, and no one will tell us because the food industry might have the largest lobbying force of any of them.
You should have seen through this story, blaming something else for what processed foods cause. Find something worth fighting.
June 22nd, 2008 at 3:50 pm
Interesting to note:
If you look at the rise of all types of cancer over the past century and then correlate it to the increase in the broadcast medium overthe same period of time, one could make a case that the growth of electronic age may have contributed (along with many other factors such as increased air pollution, food additives, vaccines, synthetic materials used in fabrics and many other technological and industrial “advances”) to this increase in many forms of cancer and other adverse health conditions.
I may be grasping at straws here but it seems to me that more subtle ways of population control appear every decade or so when the latest technofad comes along. Those of us that speak out about these things are demonized by the mainstream as kooks and flakes.
Another thing I have noticed is that there have been many people in the broadcast arena that report having children with certain mental or physical health defects. I am curious about whether a carrer in front or behind of the cameras used to record and broadcast media might be working on the the reproductive genes in those who are exposed to the radiation emitted by these electronic devices.
On a side note: My great aunt who is over 80 now had been totally against buying a color television set since they were first developed. She always said that they were dangerous. Then for some reason in the late 80’s, she bought a color set and totally changed her views on the matter. Ironically, sincethen, her body began breaking down and she began having all kinds of health issues. She was once a very literate and articualte woman but now she has to work to understand things that she hears. I do not know if this actually has to do with color television or not, but I find it odd that she has changed a lot since she began watching it.
June 22nd, 2008 at 4:03 pm
A few years ago my step-sister suffered and died most horribly from a brain tumor that grew in the exact spot where she habitually held the cell phone to her head.
I am convinced that prolonged cell phone use caused her brain cancer.
June 22nd, 2008 at 4:03 pm
Biopro??? C’mon! Sarah, please don’t try to peddle your wares here. Not one ounce of truth or substantiated data to those claims.
For everyone else…As far as cell phones are concerned, we all have choices to make every day we get up. Be an adult and quit blaming industry for your lack of individual thought. Much like the tobacco industry; common sense would tell you that inhaling smoke is NOT a good thing for the body, that’s why I made the decision not to smoke. In a capitalistic society, companies provide a good or service and we have the choice to decide if we’re going to buy it or not.
They say “great minds think alike”… I say, “great minds think for THEMSELVES!”
STOP BEING LEMMINGS! HAVE AN ORIGINAL THOUGHT, AND DO SOMETHING WITH YOUR LIFE! It’s why God put us here… to serve Him by serving others.
Me, I’ll just keep my tinfoil hat on and use my cell all I want!
June 22nd, 2008 at 4:11 pm
watching cell phones pop popcorn and other neat tricks on the internet> did not know they fried brains also… popping brain cells along with pop corn……hmmmmmm possibly we can find new and better uses for cell phones in the future…. possibly we can use them to exterminate cock roaches and a great tool for the war on terror… give the terrorist unlimited cell phone time… carpet bomb iraq, iran, afghanstan and switzerland as well with high powered cell phones with unlimited calling… call your politician from your home phone to their cell phone and keep them on the phone as long as you can….
June 22nd, 2008 at 4:32 pm
#20
Your an idiot, and a piss poor American. In Virginia, right now the Great Bismal Swamp is burning out of control. The smoke is hanging in clouds for hundreds of miles. You want to ban forests too? Lots of things smoke. Tobacco helped build this country and used to be a thriving industry, not after fair trade and bible belt, fake conservatives. The same people who are pushing anti smoking laws are the same idiots that burn books, and CD’s and think the world should live under their thumb of purity. The Christian Right are the ones trying to rewrite our Constitution and teach our children, utter, brainwashing trash. Maybe if we weren’t ranked 38th in world in education you wouldn’t have a hopeless slave class that uses the Corporations’s vices to cope with being held down by the man. You can’t pick and choose civil liberties. Why is everything pushed into a law for more revenue for the same people you bitch about. You ever been to a tobacco farm. It’s lots of poor blacks and whites running small farms in the South East. They’re killing the backbone of this country everyday, and people like you are clapping their hands for more regulations and laws to keep us down. Go buy some plastic sheeting and duct tape if the smoke bothers you so much. What are you going to do when weed is legalized and there is a hash bar and pot clinic on every corner along with a whorehouse. Hopefully you’ll all leave, like when the first quack Puritans came here. Your not the majority and you never will be, because you fight the human condition.
June 22nd, 2008 at 4:50 pm
Whatdo you mean there’s no shred of proof that Bio Pro’s cell phone chips are not effective? How do you know? Have you extensively studied Bio Pro and their products and their data for their Bio Pro cell chip? I’m sure you haven’t otherwise you wouldn’t say such nonsense. I suggest you research Bio Pro and check it out for yourself instead of assuming Bio Pro has no verified data on their product. Also, everyone who has an interest in this Cell Phone issue needs to Google the documentary “Cell Phone Wars.” buy that DVD! Its with Dr George Carlo and it shows many people WINNING lawsuits against the Cell Phone companies because these people ended up with Brain Tumors exactly where they used their Cell Phones! Check it out. And Sara, keep up the good work with Bio Pro!
June 22nd, 2008 at 4:59 pm
i am glad finally somebody has touched on this subject, I mean just take a look at this site, thank you ALEX and crew for proving my point on this
http://vids.myspace.com/index......d=35905412
June 22nd, 2008 at 5:29 pm
to #46
the cell phone popcorn video was a hoax, a hoax used to sell bluetooth devices
c’mon now haven’t ya learned anything from Alex? don’t believe everything you see and hear
June 22nd, 2008 at 5:44 pm
cut and past this into the adrees bar the video the phone companies DONT WANT YOU TO SEE http://www.maniacworld.com/mak.....es-II.html
June 22nd, 2008 at 5:59 pm
WOW x-file you is so smarts! Is you a nazi? The nazis my granddady faught said the same shit ! Why ya’ll sure sounds likes one! Well thanks to yer greeeeat wisdom Im gonna starts selling me some plutonium to the street gangs and thens is going to start seliing suicide machines for all ya’ll that wanna see god real quick like! Hey im just selling my wares right? It dont matter Right? Well Is also gots ta say that putting qoutes in your comments is very original as well! I think I is going to say ” to be or nots to bees!” hells yeah! Hey ya’ll gots one of them there tinfoil hats too? Hey are they telling ya to kill any one? Sometimes When I puts my tin hat on I sure do get some funny people teling me to do sheeeoot ! ” Oh by the way they told me to tell ya’ll that god aint real…just a made up bunch of bullshit the elite use to enslave our free will with. Ahite ya’ll come back now here?
June 22nd, 2008 at 6:34 pm
I just got rid of my cordless phone and wireless technology here at home and I use only my cell phone to write messages. Do not let this stuff into your life.
Beat the International bankers at their own game……become debt free and take your finances offshore
http://www.becomericher.info
June 22nd, 2008 at 7:06 pm
Yep I just got rid of the wireless routers. I got rid of my vonage wireless phones. I been looking into sheilded microwaves. any ideas ? shoot me a email mjs1231@hotmail.com
June 22nd, 2008 at 7:20 pm
Someone in Wales in the UK made a link between proximity of telephone masts to the amount of people committing suicide in a town there. They said the people that had committed suicide lived closer to mobile phone masts. This was investigated due to a recent spate of suicides that had the town labelled as a ’suicide town’.
June 22nd, 2008 at 7:55 pm
is using wirelss bluetooth just as bad, or better?
June 22nd, 2008 at 7:57 pm
We are fucked!
June 22nd, 2008 at 7:58 pm
This is all true, I even told everyone I knew before all the scientific studies were made. I just have a feeling for what is bad for the health.
Well, half of those 2 billions are pure idiots because they’ve been warned and still used Wifi and cell phones.
June 22nd, 2008 at 8:02 pm
Digg this 2 more votes and we get a front page on digg, lets get the message out, just click the link and digg it.
http://digg.com/world_news/The_Israeli_Spy_Ring_2
June 22nd, 2008 at 8:04 pm
Now I definitely don’t care to get the tumor in my brain removed. Why, I am in the norm now…. mine is benign, but I wonder what effect this will have. I’m sure the government is still holding out on that cure for cancer, sigh.
June 22nd, 2008 at 8:09 pm
This has been evidenced for years now and a gentleman in Forbes magazine a few months ago is on the bandwagon to let everyone know about this. One engineer claimed that using a cell phone is equivalent to smoking. It is a MICROWAVE going ingot your head. Exact cancers that mimic the exact shape of the antenna on the phone are found in people’s brains on MRI and autopsy. There is too much money involved, so you never hear this on the controlled media. (Typical humans. Their priorities are backwards, and very wrong).
June 22nd, 2008 at 8:56 pm
Maybe this is all a part of the “elite’s” plan to decimate a large portion of the world’s population. And to think, we pay through the nose for our potentially slow suicides!
June 22nd, 2008 at 8:59 pm
There are no “shielded” microwave ovens as far as I know.
You need to stand a good distance from the microwave oven when
using it.
The same is true of TV and computer monitors.
June 22nd, 2008 at 9:55 pm
#44, you’re an idiot too if you think democrats don’t want to control every aspect of our lives. After all, that stupid ex-vice president of ours is the one pushing this totally bogus global warming agenda.
June 22nd, 2008 at 10:18 pm
Fortunately despite owning a phone i have no desire for the latest available. I use my phone once or twice a week to make a call, and maybe 5 times to text. I suppose that doesn’t stop me from being effected by other means.
Personally i would rather consentrate on the Bilderbergers for the moment than this. We are in danger of being given to many things to worry about.
June 22nd, 2008 at 11:54 pm
I use my cell only in emergencies or to call someone when there is not another phone available. I DON’T LEAVE IT ON IN MY POCKET, rather i turn is off as soon as I complete my conversation and check messages. Total weekly time with the phone in in use is 10 minutes. USE COMMON SENSE, CORDLESS PHONES ARE DANGEROUS, by the old kind with a phone jack and wire.
June 23rd, 2008 at 12:30 am
I tried emailing this to Alex.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fMZhkDEsXU8 – New evidence in mobile phone tumour link.
June 23rd, 2008 at 1:09 am
Time to short Nokia.
June 23rd, 2008 at 3:09 am
I am not sure if mobile phones radio can cause damage long term. I know that the imediate effect of radio waves on the body is just heating. So the power of the device is how much it can heat by. Computer WiFi is 40mW, realy not enough heat there to do anything. However any harmful effects are unlikely to be heating, they are more likely to be some sort of ionising or electrolysis effect in the fluids of the body. They may make blood more or less likely to coagualte perhaps, or for deposits to form or be stripped.
We tend to think of radio waves as harmless. However most radio waves we have used in the past have a large wavelength and tend to go around the body. TV radio waves are getting to the size that might go through the body but these tend to be above roof height, hence the TV antenna, and are weak by the time they reach you. However a mobile phone uses smaller waves and is held against your head. It has to be powerful enough to reach the antenna mast and does not have the advantage of a decent sized antenna itself.
Microwave ovens are probably the least harmful since they are tuned to water, so any water absorbs them as heat. Your body naturally shealds them.
June 23rd, 2008 at 3:19 am
http://infamouskiller.wordpress.com/
June 23rd, 2008 at 3:20 am
http://infamouskiller.wordpress.com/ mm
June 23rd, 2008 at 3:20 am
http://infamouskiller.wordpress.com
June 23rd, 2008 at 3:36 am
Also, don’t use the new light bulbs.They emit ELF beams and transmit. Jump on GE and demand
they continue to produce the lightbulds we are used to. I’m serious!
June 23rd, 2008 at 3:54 am
What a perfect way to exterminate the sheeple.I can walk on any crowded street in manhatten and see on every block someone with a cell phone glued to their head,or running their big mouths about nothing in public places,in cars driving like asses.I use one with a ear piece only when I have too.If the elite had micro chips implants so the sheeple can communicate with each other,they would line up for miles for the new fashion gadget!LOL
June 23rd, 2008 at 5:20 am
Does anyone else find it curious that cellphones also track you any & everywhere you go as well as being a perfect habitual softkill device?
Does anyone else find it curious that cellphones can be used (or are being used) to evesdrop on you anytime,anywhere.Even if you turn it off & remove the battery?
Is anyone curious wether or not they have the manpower to surveil us all?
Is anyone curious about artificial intelligence supercomputers doing it all automatically scanning for keywords?
Is anyone curious it was introduced using snob appeal with ‘important businessmen’ on t.v. clinching deals on house brick size cellphones?
Is anyone curious the microchip is being introduced using snob appeal so trendies can get into special bars using a chip that’s huge in comparison with the chip that’s “ready to go”?
I am Curious!
June 23rd, 2008 at 6:02 am
Well finaly a nice concice article on this. This is perfict for e maling to my frends thanks to every one who worked on it. Ona simmilar note arent thoes new scanners at the air port (the ones that see ya naked) work with EM radation. Wonder howmany air travlers are going to get strange cansers; Not to mention teh pregnent wonen!
June 23rd, 2008 at 6:16 am
I got rid of my cell phone a year ago and haven’t watched TV for 10 years. Now I just need to get rid of my computer and move to Montana.
June 23rd, 2008 at 8:03 am
That’s why I don’t and WON’T own one of these blasted things – nevermind the guvmint eavesdropping and gps tracking. Go back to landlines, folks! Stop using wireless units in you home too! Go back to the cord phones! You survived before the advent of the cell phone and you can survive without now. Stop wasting your money on ‘em and put that money toward preparing for the “wrath to come” or at least give the money to charity!
June 23rd, 2008 at 8:35 am
Infowars Expats : Water as a Weapon!!!by Janet C. Phelan
Posted by KILL_NWO_RATS on 2008/6/22 20:46:03 (4 reads)
Through Section 817 of the Patriot Act, Congress has authorized a mass domestic de-population program.
In August of 2004, quietly and without fanfare, an article was published on the Los Angeles Independent Media website revealing a plan by the U.S. government to depopulate the country via the water system. The article alleged that the water system had been reconfigured country-wide so as to function as a finely honed targeting system, which, when deployed, would selectively target individual homes with undrinkable, or “death” water. The article alleged that this had been accomplished by the construction of a complex system of double lines and mixing capabilities on the main lines. In this manner, certain, pre-selected homes would receive the ordinary water while the targeted homes would receive the mixture. It is the contention of this reporter that the mixture will kill those imbibing the water.
Nearly three years have passed since the publication of “Public Extermination Project.” New information has surfaced supporting these claims. In addition, this reporter has determined some errors in the initial report, which mandate correcting.
A careful reading of Section 817 of the Patriot Act, “The Expansion of the Biological Weapons Statute,” reveals this to be the umbrella statute which is authorizing this project. While the wording of this statute is somewhat opaque, a diligent scrutiny of the language reveals its true intent.
Firstly, this statute is legalizing “delivery systems” and “toxins” under certain circumstances. “Delivery systems” is weapons terminology. “Toxins” are poisons. The statute details when these delivery systems and toxins will and will not be legal.
Poisons, as we all know, are meant to terminate, not enhance, life. There is no mention in 817 of these poisons being utilized as any sort of legally sanctioned punishment for a crime, such as lethal injection. Rather, the statute states that these SHALL be legal when used for purposes determined as “peaceful, protective, prophylactic or bona fide research.”
Setting aside the research clause, we are essentially seeing the legalizing of “peaceful, protective, prophylactic…..” poisoning.
We have thus essentially bypassed any necessity for due process and have authorized the use of poisons to kill.
A dissection of the part of this statute which lists the “restricted persons,” who are disallowed from possessing or transporting these delivery systems and toxins indicates that this statute is not authorizing a military operation. The list of restricted persons follows:
“(2) The term `restricted person’ means an individual who–
“(A) is under indictment for a crime punishable by
imprisonment for a term exceeding 1 year;
“(B) has been convicted in any court of a crime
punishable by imprisonment for a term exceeding 1 year;
“(C) is a fugitive from justice;
“(D) is an unlawful user of any controlled
substance (as defined in section 102 of the Controlled
Substances Act (21 U.S.C. 802));
“(E) is an alien illegally or unlawfully in the
United States;
“(F) has been adjudicated as a mental defective or
has been committed to any mental institution;
“(G) is an alien (other than an alien lawfully
admitted for permanent residence) who is a national of a
country as to which the Secretary of State, pursuant to
section 6(j) of the Export Administration Act of 1979
(50 U.S.C. App. 2405(j)), section 620A of chapter 1 of
part M of the Foreign Assistance Act of 1961 (22 U.S.C.
2371), or section 40(d) of chapter 3 of the Arms Export
Control Act (22 U.S.C. 2780(d)), has made a
determination (that remains in effect) that such country
has repeatedly provided support for acts of
international terrorism; or
“(H) has been discharged from the Armed Services of
the United States under dishonorable conditions.
Nowhere is there any mention of exclusive military dominion over these delivery systems and toxins. We therefore infer that this is NOT authorizing the use of poisons in warfare against an enemy of the United States of America.
So who are the intended recipients of this biological warfare, authorized in this statute? If not an enemy of this country, could it be selected segments of the U.S. population?
We have seen in our country, since 911, the stripping of civil rights that historically accompanies the rise of fascism. Our vote seems to have gone the way of Diebold, and can now be electronically finessed by those who seek to cement their continued governing power. Our privacy rights have been crushed by the “national emergency” that the attacks of 911 established as an ongoing national predicament. Most newspaper editors will acknowledge, at least in private conversation, that they believe their office phone lines to be tapped. Peace groups, and even Quakers, have been under surveillance, and an act as simple and unremarkable as checking a book out of a library now may invoke FBI scrutiny of library records, courtesy of the Patriot Act.
The Patriot Act had already been written before the attacks of 911, and was waiting in the wings to be trotted out and rammed through Congress. It is not my intention here to attempt an analysis of who the true perpetrators were of the 911 attacks. This has been adequately done by many authors and researchers, including Webster Tarpley and David Ray Griffin. What these redoubtable authors have failed to do is to draw the line of reasoning between the creation of what Tarpley terms “synthetic terror” to the war on Iraq as a position in a global chess game, rather than as an imperialistic invasion for purpose of seizure of oil resources. And neither Tarpley, Griffin, or any other of the 911 researchers that I am aware of have drawn attention to the implications of 817 as authorizing a mass domestic extermination project.
David Ray Griffin has postulated 911 to be a “new Pearl Harbor.” Tarpley has compared this event to the Reichstag fires in Hitler’s pre-war Germany. While Griffin’s analogy to the event that kicked off the U.S. involvement in WWII certainly helps us to understand how governments may either allow or even initiate certain events in order to make war on other countries, it fails in the analysis of what has become, through the Patriot Act and the Military Commissions Act, a war on the citizens of the U.S.
Tarpley’s comparison between 911 and the Reichstag fires provides a more fertile field for comparison. It is a matter of historical fact that Hitler had his own Brownshirts burn down the German Parliament, then blamed this destructive act on the Communists. This provided a bogus “national emergency” so as to provide a rationale for the stripping of civil liberties necessary for his ascension to dictatorship.
As a result of the false state of emergency, Hitler was granted emergency powers. He ultimately used these enhanced powers to invade Poland, Norway, the Netherlands, France, Belgium as he headed on towards his mission of world control, and to launch an extermination policy within his own country. The mass genociding of the Jews, the gypsies, Communists, Jehovah’s Witnesses, the disabled, homosexuals and political dissidents in Hitler’s Germany has become the modern day standard against which other brutal dictatorships are now measured.
The process of rights- stripping as a result of the creation of “synthetic terror,” as well as our imperialistic invasions of the Middle East strongly echo Hitler’s prototype. Missing is an awareness of a domestic extermination policy. It is the contention of this reporter that the Patriot Act has indeed codified a domestic extermination policy, via “delivery systems” and “toxins,” which has yet to be deployed. 817 appears to be the slam dunk death clause in the Patriot Act.
And if the Jews are, again, one of the primary targets slated for extermination, as this reporter believes, then the destruction of Israel would be a necessary pre-condition for the deployment of the water weapon. Through our invasion of Iraq, we have secured a base with proximity to Israel. This will facilitate the bombing and wholesale destruction of the tiny Jewish state, which our government could then easily blame on Osama bin Laden, Iran, Hezbollah or whatever most convenient fall guy we choose.
The media has gingerly reported the stripping of rights that followed on the heels of the 911 attacks. It is now common knowledge that intelligence agencies can commandeer bookstore records, bug conference rooms and tap phones with impunity. It is NOT common knowledge that the government can, at will and without due process, poison selected U.S. citizens. It is the hope of this reporter that by adequately documenting the plan to use the water system as a weapons system that it may be possible to derail what will otherwise be the worst genocidal attack in the history of the planet.
In order for the water system to be deployed as a selective, finely honed targeting system, it would be necessary for it to be configured in certain ways. First of all, there would need to be at least two water lines in most neighborhoods. One line would provide ordinary water, while the second line would contain the toxins. My research on the water system in such disparate venues as Los Angeles and Spokane has revealed the existence of the double line system.
I have attached two photographs of blueprints from the Spokane water system (Attachments 1& 2). These were obtained April 19, 2007, at a public meeting held at Applebee’s Restaurant on 29th Street in Spokane. The work in this area has significantly disrupted traffic and access to local businesses. The meetings were held weekly to answer questions of local business owners and residents.
I identified myself as a Sandpoint based writer and requested of Steve Sather, project engineer, a viewing of the blueprints. He immediately complied, and I requested photographing privileges. He assented.
The attached photos, taken that morning, reveal the double line system on 29th Street in Spokane, Washington. This particular project involved the replacement of two water lines—a twelve inch main and a parallel 36 inch main. The onsite foreman, Brian Snipes, who appeared quite uncomfortable with my request to photograph the prints, informed me that the 36 inch line was a transmission line, and not to be tapped. However, the blueprints reveal something pivotal about this system: access line connecting the two lines, every fifty yards or so. According to the specs, both lines were placed 5.5 feet deep. The only reasonable assumption is that the two mains are connected by the access lines.
Snipes had attempted to refute my perception that the two pipes were, in fact, connected. He had informed me that the connective pipe was flexible, and would bend under the second main. The pipe I viewed that day did not, in fact, appear to be flexible.
In 2006, I submitted more requests for documents to the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power. Specifically, I requested blueprints from the Ardmore Street Cement Re-lining Project.
The attached letter came back from LADWP, signed by Ronald Deaton, General Manager, He stated that certain “sensitive” information would be redacted from the blueprints that would be ponied up to me. Understanding that I would be viewing altered blueprints, I scheduled a meeting in March of 2007. Every print I was given was stamped “REDACTED.” However, there were no indications of white-out or black- out on the prints. Aside from a few scattered indications of hydrant valves, there were no other valves detailed on the blueprints. There was also virtually no evidence of service lines from the main(s) to houses or businesses. The infamous second lines were, in almost every blueprint, also missing. In the process of “redacting,” it appears that LADWP created entirely new documents for me to view.
I have also attached a recent letter from the City of Santa Monica, in response to California Public Records Act requests for information about the water system Santa Monica was one of the cities initially contacted by this reporter, and the responses to those requests are contained in the link to the original article.
This letter, signed by Eugenia Jimenez for Assistant City Attorney Joseph Lawrence, states that my requests for blueprints and for contracts with private companies are “highly sensitive and jeopardize the security of the City.” You may note by re-visiting the “Public Extermination Project” article that Joe Lawrence also put his name to a letter in 2004 stating that there were no records whatsoever on water work in Santa Monica, California.
I have also attached two photographs of blueprints of the Los Angeles water system (Attachments 7 &8). Through a bit of studiously disingenuous Irish blarney, this reporter was able to view and photograph some of the non-redacted blueprints from the Ardmore Street Project.
I located an ongoing work site, and arrived in the late morning. I had sidled up to a small group of Creamer employees who were digging up a section of the street (both Creamer and Spiniello were awarded sections of the cement re-lining contract). While the crews are buttressing the aging pipes with cement, they are also replacing the manually operated valves with remote controlled valves. This is critical to the deployment of this weapons system. More about these valves a little later on in this report.
I chatted with the forklift operator for a bit. I told him I was a reporter covering infrastructure work. “How boring,” he commented. I made a face and agreed. We talked a little, and I asked if I could get a gander at the blueprints. He was agreeable, and asked another crew member to retrieve the plans from the truck. Immediately, I sat down on the curb and began to shoot.
Within a few minutes, he realized that I was photographing the blueprints. He got down off the lift and walked over to me. “Hey,” he said uneasily, “I don’t know who you are. We are in very strange times. You could be a terrorist….” His voice trailed off.
I smiled at him, as disarmingly as possible, and quickly stuck my cameras in my pocket. “Oh my goodness,” I said. “I don’t want to worry you. Here, take back the plans.” And then I winked at him. “Actually,” I said, “I am Osama bin Laden. They shrunk me and gave me a sex change, so the CIA could never find me. Pretty clever, wouldn’t you say?”
He laughed. The moment of suspicion had passed. He took the plans back to the truck, and my cameras remained safe inside my jacket pocket.
“Hey, listen to this!” he said to his buddies on the crew. “She’s Osama!” Everyone had a good laugh. I stayed a few more minutes, chatting amiably with the guys, then took off, my cameras and photographs secure.
The two attached photos from the Ardmore Street project were taken that day with a cell phone camera and with a standard camera. The second line is in evidence in both photos, which delineate separate streets in the Ardmore Street Cement Re-lining Project.
One of my detractors, Harry Mobley, of Alton, Illinois, has stated that the existence of two lines is “normal.” Mobley writes, “…. but second lines are there already. That’s normal. It’s a backup to feed around any breaks
when certain lines have to be closed down for repair.
This way, the problem affects the least amount of customers.”
If that were in fact true, the city would not need to lay down temporary, gutter lines while doing this infrastructure work. As the City of Los Angeles needs to provide a continuity of water service while working on the main lines, and if the second lines were indeed, as Mobley stated, only back-up lines and NOT containing another substance, the temporary gutter lines in evidence in the following photograph would not be necessary. The city would simply utilize its back-up line, and would not incur the added work and expense of laying down gutter pipe. The attached photograph of gutter line during a recent cement re-lining project was taken at Washington Boulevard, in Los Angeles, California (Attachment 9).
The blueprints I photographed in 2006 from the Ardmore Street Project do not appear to be as complete as the ones I first viewed back in 2004, while the City was working on the Washington/La Brea area, nor as complete as the Spokane prints. Engineers, architects and others with access to water blueprints will affirm that there are layers of work that have been done on the underground utilities throughout the years, and different sets of blueprints will reveal varying levels of complexity in delineating the systems. The blueprints I first viewed in Los Angeles, courtesy of an on-site foreman, revealed not only the existence of double lines, but access lines connecting the two lines at regular intervals. This was also revealed in the plans from the Spokane system.
The L.A. plans had also revealed “crosses” in front of every residence on that street. I had incorrectly designated these as “tees” in my first publication on the water weapon. Tees, be they tee fixtures or tee valves, have three ports. Crosses have four ports. The significance of tees and crosses in the water system is that three or more ports provide the possibility to introduce another substance into the primary line.
For purposes of clarification as to the functions of tees, I have attached a photo of an exposed tee, taken at Casa Las Rosas in Los Angeles, in 2005 (Attachment 10). As you will see, there are three ports, or accesses. As water cannot flow both East/West and West/East at the same time, two of the ports provide for the uninterrupted flow of water in one direction. The third port would allow for the possibility of an introduction of a substance from another line into the main line.
A valve would be necessary to control the introduction of a substance from another source. Without a control valve, the two substances would be freely intermingling.
My original assumption that tee, or three port valves, were involved in this system may not be entirely accurate. Virgil Diaz, who is a sales rep for Mueller, which has acquired U.S. Pipe, advanced my understanding of this system by pointing out that gate valves positioned on tee joints serve the same function as tee, or three port, valves. The same would go for gate valves on cross joints. The red valve depicted in the second photo on the “Public Extermination Project” article is, in fact, a gate valve, which is a two port valve. The first photo depicts a gate valve on a tee joint.
The original article had stated that the red valves were manufactured by Tyton. They are, in fact, manufactured by U.S. Pipe. An overview of the officers of U.S. Pipe reveals a very compelling history. Ray Torok, President of U.S. Pipe, previously spent twenty five years at Alcoa, as Vice President and General Manager of the Aerospace Division. Walter Knollenberg, VP of Finance and Treasurer of U.S. Pipe, previously served as Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Burns Aerospace Corporation. Aerospace companies are generally known for their government contracts, including spy satellites, etc. It would be an unusual career path from aerospace to plumbing. Unless, of course, there is a direct connection between the satellites and the water system.
And apparently there is. The ROM Communications website provides a diagram which depicts how remote controlled water valves can be accessed off a computer, lap top or even cell phone (Attachment 11). As shown in the diagram, the originating signal goes into the internet and up to a satellite, which can then relay the signal to the items featured on the left hand side of the diagram. Please note the inclusion of the water valve as a “remote asset” in the far left of the diagram. I have also attached a photo of gate valves stacked up in the City Yard in Santa Monica, California (Attachment 12). You will note the chalked in numbers on the valves on the bottom row. These appear to be RFID addresses
The ability to control these valves from a remote location is a necessary component of this system. The system has been configured for a mass kill—therefore, it would be wildly impractical and ludicrously inefficient to attempt to dispatch teams of workers throughout the broad sweep of this country to dig up the streets and manually turn all the valves at the designated time of deployment. The valves would need to be solenoid, or remote controlled. Thus, at the time of deployment, after determination had been made as to which locations house the targets and which will be “passed over,” one would need only throw a switch to open the valves. And the twisted vision which compelled Prescott Bush, who was the money man in the U.S. for Adolph Hitler, would be brought to fruition under the reign of his grandson, President George W. Bush.
In a taped interview in March of 2006, Ali Sabouni, the Resident Engineer for the Ardmore Street Project, stated emphatically that “There is no such thing as a remote controlled water valve.” When further questioned as to how timed sprinkler systems operate, he sputtered, then back-tracked. “Those are small valves,” he said, lamely.
Small valves. What a relief. Then we really have nothing to worry about.
For Ali Sabouni, who is in charge of the Ardmore Street Project, one of thousands of such projects across the country, Ali Sabouni, who refused to tell me the country of his birth or where he obtained his Master’s Degree in Engineering, Ali Sabouni tells me that remote controlled sprinkler valves are small valves.
I’m sure glad we cleared that up.
Hitler had his showers. Bush has his water lines.
God help us all.
Water As A Weapon
by Janet C. Phelan Friday, May. 04, 2007 at 5:29 PM
(310) 755-4469
Janet C. Phelan
Sandpoint, Idaho
April 21, 2007
“If I am not for myself, who will be?
If I am only for myself, who am I?
And if not now, when?”
—-Rabbi Hillel
Find this article and many more at;
http://www.911truth.ch/new/modules/newbb/
June 23rd, 2008 at 8:48 am
well remember when cell phones first came out and to get like 500 minutes on one was crazy expensive. now its “unlimited family time minutes” all for like 80 dollars.
June 23rd, 2008 at 9:07 am
http://youtube.com/watch?v=uTCasFeRNQY
June 23rd, 2008 at 9:58 am
My cell phone was stolen in 2005 (and I just got it in 2003).
I averaged 10 minutes per day when I had it.
I don’t miss it, and I have always found them obnoxious. 99% of calls are of frivolous nature and people seem to think it’s a status symbol to check your text messages at the bar every five minutes, and to walk around with it plastered to their ear, as if they are too exclusive. Headphones and sunglasses are other examples of people being unneighborly. Sad when you can no longer walk by someone and say hello.
Neil
June 23rd, 2008 at 10:27 am
I hardly use my phone. i average about 80 min a month. however I do use about +8,000 txt messages. any studies on txt messaging?
June 23rd, 2008 at 10:49 am
microwaves are interesting as they influnce thought. Its also interesting that the current system slowly kills us all. As if theres no reason to live beyond a two year contract or pay a fee of 5 billion to your lords and masters of technology and power.
(maniacle laughter heard in the distance)
June 23rd, 2008 at 11:26 am
Who put this piece together? A 10-year-old? This article reads like one of those instruction manuals that has been very poorly translated into English. (”All your base are belong to us”). It cites the “studies and survey” conducted by an Australian group but then does not cite the actual name of the study, when it was conducted, and whether it was peer-reviewed. The supporting graphic is from a source in Finland, not Australia. The third paragraph is not even a complete sentence, but is a long phrase. While there may very well be cause for concern with cellphone use, this piece is just garbage. Alex Jones does nothing to help his own credibility by linking to a piece of Internet effluvium like this.
June 23rd, 2008 at 11:26 am
What about laptops on the lap with wireless connection?
June 23rd, 2008 at 11:35 am
The negative mental effects will get 85% of the cell phone addicts long before 2020.
The total addiction I see in 60% of young to middle age women every day is very serious.
Much worse than tobacco overall!
June 23rd, 2008 at 12:09 pm
I always keep my cell phone at least 5 feet away from me when not in use. I barely use my phone. I’m actually considering a land line phone. I live without a cell phone for 30 years, so surely I’d survive.
Check this out……….huge victory in Texas against the NAFTA superhighway.
http://www.alipac.us/ftopict-120475-.html
June 23rd, 2008 at 12:10 pm
I never use them any more anyway the are a waste of time and a bain on society. Ever noticed how your ear feels after being on one for a while.
June 23rd, 2008 at 12:57 pm
http://www.theforbiddenknowled.....ckpope.htm. Please read
June 23rd, 2008 at 1:13 pm
Positive Orgone Energy defeats Electromagnetic Radiation, Extra Low Frequency Radiation, HAARP, GWEN and Deadly (negative) Orgone Radiation. Gift your neigborhood.
How to make your own: http://www.orgoneblasters.com/make-your-own.htm
June 23rd, 2008 at 1:53 pm
I does not matter what wireless device it is, they all operate within the same spectrum. If you have the phone in your pocket it is affecting your kidneys, liver, and genitals. Some phones even continue transmiting when turned off. If you have a wi-fi enabled laptop same thing. If you stand in front of the microwave while you are cooking food same thing.
If you can understand what it does to your brain at such low power as that of a cellphone think about how it is destroying your food and making it toxic whilst you microwave.
I love how people point to spelling and gramatical errors as a method to refute evidence. “He misspelled a word he obviously is wrong! Good enough reason for me to keep using my phone”
Do not use a cellphone, get vonage its only 30 a month. Do not use Wi-Fi, use that old fashion cat 6e cable. Do not use a cordless telephone either. Recycle your microwave and get a toaster oven. It takes a MINIMUM of 10 years for cancer to develop!!! How long have you been using your cellphone? Ever get a headache, or do your ears start ringing after prolonged use?
You people are retarded. Willful ignorance is the new natural selection.
June 23rd, 2008 at 1:58 pm
Hi InfoWarriors,
I wanted to ad some info for you all. TEXT MESSAGING is DANGEROUS the phone still has to transmit the signal. It is a little less dangerous to text because you aren’t holding the phone to your head. The microwave radiation from cell phones is bio-accumulative and your risk increases with the length of exposure and proximity to the source. LAPTOPS, CORDLESS PHONE, BLUE TOOTH, WIFI ALL EMIT DANGEROUS LEVELS OF ELECTRO MAGNETIC RADIATION. The DANGER comes from the high frequency signal that transmits the same wave constantly. CHECK OUT OUR NEW BANNER AT THE BOTTOM OF INFOWARS.COM for BIOPRO’S CELL CHIP’S made to address this problem. LET ME SHOW YOU IT WORKS
Check out my new BANNER on
June 23rd, 2008 at 4:30 pm
“LA-LI-LU-LE-LO Says:
June 23rd, 2008 at 10:27 am
I hardly use my phone. i average about 80 min a month. however I do use about +8,000 txt messages. any studies on txt messaging?”
Me TOO… i don’t really talk to people using min. but i do use text.. my phone is rarely to my head….its more in my hand…will the waves still affect me? well to that extent?
June 23rd, 2008 at 4:38 pm
BIOPRO’S CELL CHIP
)
Slapping a sticker on your phone will save your brain? HAHAHA
Alex & his hippie crystal-gripping bullsh*t sponsors – hillarious. Scare them with FACTS about cell phone dangers, then offer a ripoff snake oil ’solution’ 2 line his pockets – pretty sick. Reminds me of those fire/brimstone preachers that scare people into donating money 2 the church, lest they B damned in eternal HELLFIRE! =:-o
What lies. U wanna’ help lower your risk? Stop using a cell phone – period! I do not own, & will not use one – period!
June 23rd, 2008 at 6:53 pm
Can I get some of that snake oil?
June 23rd, 2008 at 9:52 pm
What about the blue tooth headsets? Please….lie to me, the iPhone 3G hits on July 11!
June 24th, 2008 at 12:08 pm
Blue tooth still has to send a signal from the ear piece to the phone then to wherever else it sends it. I would think blue tooth is worse cause it sits closer to your ear =/ imo
July 7th, 2008 at 4:53 pm
check out microwavenews dot com
and other websites – well worth the time
read how the issue is being dug up, then buried again and again
actual letters from the snakes who dig the holes,
claiming they are helping when they are just protecting the industry
Repicoli and many others, faces will change but the goal remains the same
more wifi, wimax, 3G, bluetooth, it goes on and on
one would think they would be holding back industry progress
technology is like a drug,
people wanting more and more,
radiation is the side effect they didnt expect,
but they are so addicted, they dont care anymore and do it anyways
they feel they cant live without it,
until they find out they cant live anymore because of it
its obvious who is trying to keep the issue very low key
and that they are waiting until it is “past the point of no return”
they are just waiting for the radiation to kick in
when people start dropping like flies it will be too late
then they will say something
World Health Organization – we know what your upto
study after study, but no changes. Some minor bans with driving cars,
but in summary, its just growing, more wifi, more phones, more addicts, more headed for a crash -
with a chain reaction by the same name – if we are all sick, whos running the show
think about it
July 7th, 2008 at 5:04 pm
<>
research the communications in WW2, the radar operators health showed that this type of exposure had certain radiation related effects. Dont forget, we are talking about MICROWAVE Communications. The FDA had a wide range of frequencies that could have used other ranges of the communications spectrum – see their chart and compare – but they went ahead and used the most dangerous, Ever noticed that a wireless home phones started out as 2.4 megahertz and a Microwave oven is at 2.4 mhz.. more then a coincidence
July 9th, 2008 at 9:37 am
I’m 16 years old and I hardly ever use my mobile phone.But i play/work 8 or more hours a day on my computer.His monitor is 17″ LCD.I want to ask,how much hours should I be in front of my PC
and what breaks must I do.
August 8th, 2008 at 4:34 am
Mobile phones are one of the most unnecessary of modern creations. The more people use it ,the more they want to-it’s addictive. Children under 12 yrs. should NEVER use them, their brains are still developing and keep on all through the teens. It also creates a dumbed- down mentality, where inter-action in the normal way is getting rarer. I’m not a user and don’t intend to become one, the masts and everything that makes them possible does cause cancer and puts people living near them at risk-like living in a micro wave oven. THINK every time you take that mobile out-is that call REALLY that urgent? I recently heard a young woman say (on her mobile) “I’m coming round the corner,I’ll be there in two minutes! WHY?
December 11th, 2008 at 7:07 am
General Electric and the Consumer Product Safety Commission have announced a voluntary recall of nearly 244,000 GE, GE Profile, Monogram and Kenmore branded wall ovens. The units pose a risk of fire or burns during the
March 4th, 2009 at 4:49 am
wow im must be a stunned cunt cause i dont know.
the yank must own the fish?