Comments on: 29 Engineers: Only Explosives Can Explain 9/11 World Trade Center Destruction

By: Greg Brooks

Greg Brooks — Tue, 30 Jun 2009 04:22:38 +0000

Thank you for speaking up.
I can’t believe what people are willing to tolerate.
Now you know how Germany allowed Hitler to do so much damage.
I guess people just like to see citizens leap from collapsing buildings.
Maybe they think it will always happen to someone else.
I’m a veteran too- had a top secret clearance in the 70’s & 80’s.
I love my country. But they’ve got Rip Van Winkle Syndrome.

By: Civil Engineer

Civil Engineer — Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:15:29 +0000

Starting:

One again I hear what your saying and in general I don’t disagree.

But I respectfully disagree on one point: The the investigation of how and why the buildings collapsed is not irrelevant. It is relevant to show the ignorant masses how they are being deceived. It’s relevant as a starting point because it’s easy to prove, unlike the airplane issue. But I would hope this too would come out as a though investigation takes its logical course.

I would hope that lawful prosecutions would follow the independent investigation. But once again, I cannot disagree with your questions on how this would happen. Certainly the same questions would apply even if the investigation centered around the airplanes.

You are right, there are powerful large organizations that don’t want the info out there, and therefore, would (are) resisting the call for an independent investigation.

Unfortunately, as we move into the Greater Depression, the issues of 9-11, and its importance, will diminish. So I’m not holding my breath waiting for this investigation to occur.

Keep up the good work!
Good Luck!

By: starting

starting — Sun, 28 Jun 2009 19:31:19 +0000

If there were no commercial planes on 9/11….then ALL of 9/11 and every decision from it is based on a fabricated lie. It would be irrelevant to have a “re-investigation” because there were NO commercial planes. Of course the buildings were detonated…there was no jet fuel because there were no commercial planes. There is no need for another wasteful and useless investigation…you already know the results.

The only thing that matters are the planes of 9/11. That’s what 9/11 was! 9/11 was not about buildings…it was about the “terrorists” highjacking commercial airliners. When there are no commercial planes on 9/11…..9/11 is then based on a lie regardless of how many buildings fell at free fall speed. By the way…who is paying for this re-investigation? What evidence are you verifying? Who’s on the board? If they find a crime will there be charges? What if it simply says the opposite of the first investigation…wouldn’t that simply cancel each other out?

There were no commercial planes on 9/11. No investigation of how criminal your military, government, military contractor owned US media, and US corporations is needed. They lied and covered up the fact that there were no commercial planes on 9/11.

By: Civil Engineer

Civil Engineer — Sun, 28 Jun 2009 16:22:37 +0000

I hear what your saying. Maybe the airplanes were military or just holograms. But that point is irrelevant to the way the buildings collapsed. And of course to WTC7.

Don’t let the issue of the airplanes distract from the call to re-investigate 9-11!

By: Jefferson Hope

Jefferson Hope — Sat, 27 Jun 2009 20:35:03 +0000

You’re right, bro. Math is the language of the universe, therefore fire brought down WTC 7. The formula for this conclusion is:

σφ2Y40ê + x2(80piaB») = fire.

P.S. you’re a douche bag.

By: jupiter

jupiter — Sat, 27 Jun 2009 14:56:45 +0000

There were no commercial planes on 9/11. Meaning the official story and everything and every decision from it was based on the idea that planes with people on them crashed at 4 locations from 4 planes on 9/11. That is a lie….again. There were no commercial planes on 9/11. It is essential to continue the lie in NYC because it would immediately expose the US military corporation owned media as a direct conspirator to the actions and events of 9/11.

My life has now been threatened. Everyone I know who has researched this information and has come forward to declare that there were no commercial planes on 9/11 is being mysteriously killed. I will continue to write and post as long as I can. All my computer information has long since been protected, backed-up, and secured with detailed instructions to many should I be found “missing” in any way.

Alex…..I have been writing on your site for several years now. You know my IP address. Contact me?!! I have video/audio of agents threatening me. Would you like to see it?

By: bogus

bogus — Sat, 27 Jun 2009 14:47:39 +0000

There were no commercial planes on 9/11.

By: starting

starting — Sat, 27 Jun 2009 14:46:39 +0000

Civil…..there were no commercial planes on 9/11. It was a fabricated lie involving the US military, government, corporations, and the US military corporation owned media. With no commercial planes it means every decision and action from 9/11 is based on a lie….patriot act, preemptive wars, torture, renditions, military commission, TSA, Homeland Security…all of it.

By: Civil Engineer

Civil Engineer — Sat, 27 Jun 2009 00:07:40 +0000

My mistake. There are over 4500 Engineer’s, Architects, Scientists, and students who are calling for an independent investigation of 9-11.

By: Civil Engineer

Civil Engineer — Fri, 26 Jun 2009 14:41:01 +0000

An explosion of fuel is not enough to bring down a modern designed building or bridge. The heat must stay concentrated for a long time 1 to 2 hours (or more), and be a very high temp.. Look at the video from the building in Spain.

Airplanes (jets) are light. Basically, hollow aluminum tubes with very little mass as compared to the building support columns. The engines do indeed have some mass but there is not enough of them to bring down a building.

Anyway, I a flash burn of fuel (especially low temp )could not do catastrophic structural damage to any modern structure. In fact, they are designed to prevent sudden collapse. Yes even from airplane impacts.