 |
 |
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
|
|||
 |
|||
|
|||
 |
|||
|
A Review of Jason Bermas’s Fabled Enemies
- Text size
Jeremy R. Hammond
Dissident Voice
Monday, Oct 13, 2008
Fabled Enemies a new documentary video that challenges the official version of 9/11, is the latest in the ever-expanding list of films and videos dealing with the topic, which have varied greatly in worth. Though not without flaws, the video is a refreshing change of course from a great many of the less valuable ones that focused mainly on the collapses of the World Trade Center buildings. While touching briefly on the collapse of building 7, the documentary mostly approaches the issue from a different angle by reviewing some of the great amount of other evidence that the official story of the events of that day are a mere legend and that the U.S. government has gone to great lengths to cover up the truth.
Fabled Enemies is written and directed by Jason Bermas, who was a co-producer of the Loose Change series, and produced by Alex Jones. It is a significant improvement over the Loose Change videos, which, although progressing in quality which each new version, focused heavily on questions like whether or not a plane hit the Pentagon, whether Flight 93 crashed in the field in Pennsylvania, and whether the WTC buildings were brought down in controlled demolitions, while failing to sufficiently address the enormous amount of other information demonstrating that the official story is a lie. Fabled Enemies goes a number of steps further than the third and final edition of Loose Change toward bringing a good number of these other matters to the attention of the viewing public.
Bermas begins by suggesting that Osama bin Laden was not responsible for the attacks, such as by pointing out that 9/11 is not listed as being among the crimes for which Osama bin Laden is wanted on his FBI poster, and that the FBI has explained that this is because there is no hard evidence linking him to the attacks. He perhaps does himself a disservice, however, by implying that he isn’t a dangerous terrorist, a conclusion that doesn’t necessarily follow from the premise.
- A d v e r t i s e m e n t
He then addresses the matter of the hijackers’ connections to U.S. intelligence and the military, such as reports that some were trained at U.S. bases.
The video features an interview with Mike Springman, a former consular officer who worked in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. During his service there from 1987 and through the end of the Soviet-Afghan war, he routinely turned down visas for foreigners seeking entry into the U.S. based upon the requirements of the law. But his decisions were sometimes overturned as CIA officers bypassed him or went over his head to get visas for members of the mujahedeen from the war in Afghanistan to travel to the U.S. for recruitment and training and other actions to assist the CIA-backed war effort.
Bermas might have also noted at this point in the video that there are other precedents substantiating Springman’s claims, such as the fact that it was similarly CIA agents that repeatedly granted Sheikh Omar Abdel-Rahman, the “Blind Sheikh” accused of masterminding the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center, entry into the U.S. despite the fact that he had been included on the State Department’s terrorist watchlist.
The interlocking web of events and characters connecting the 1993 bombing with the 2001 attacks is another underreported facet of 9/11.
Before bin Laden’s organization became known as “al Qaeda” or “the Base,” it was known as Makhtab al-Khidamat. Either as an alias or subsidiary branch, it was also known as Al Kifah. The U.S. Department of the Treasury has this to say about it: “Makhtab al-Khidamat/Al Kifah (MK) is considered to be the pre-cursor organization to al Qaeda and the basis for its infrastructure. MK was initially created by Osama bin Laden’s (UBL) mentor Shaykh Abdullah Azzam who was also the spiritual founder of Hamas, as an organization to fund mujahideen in the Soviet-Afghan conflict. MK has helped funnel fighters and money to the Afghan resistance in Peshawar, Pakistan, and had established recruitment centers worldwide to fight the Soviets.”
One of those recruitment centers was the Alkifah Refugee Center in Brooklyn, New York. One of the mosques from which a certain Omar Abdel Rahman, a.k.a. “the Blind Sheikh,” preached was a few doors down from Alkifah.
The Sheikh was good friends with Gulbaddin Hekmatyar, and had travelled to Peshawar to meet with the CIA’s favored beneficiary.
Despite being on the terrorist watch list, Sheikh Omar was allowed to enter the U.S. In fac, this visa was approved by the CIA. The Sheikh travelled in and out of the country at will, and it was the CIA itself which reviewed and approved his application on at least six separate occasions.
Of course, it is impossible for filmmakers to fit every piece of information into a reasonable time frame that seeks to keep viewers informed while keeping pace enough to not lose out to those with short attention spans. Bermas does an excellent job in his documentary of touching briefly on a huge variety of aspects of 9/11 that are, regrettably, often overlooked and overshadowed by the enormous focus within the 9/11 Truth movement on the building collapses. It is up to proactive viewers to then take that information they are presented and follow through by doing some research of their own.
Moreover, while Bermas has a tendency to sensationalize or overstate the evidence he presents, for the most part the information he covers has been solidly documented and his narrative draws plenty of solid conclusions and asks a lot of the right questions.
One example of information viewers should be skeptical about is the document that is shown stating that Osama bin Laden was a CIA asset known by the alias “Tim Osman”. This document is given even more prominence by its inclusion on the box cover for the DVD. Although widely distributed on the internet (such as at WhatReallyHappened.com, the website of Michael Rivero, who is also interviewed in the video), it is not sourced and is thus of questionable authenticity (Mr. Rivero did not respond to an e-mail request for information on the source of this document). Bermas does a disservice to his viewers by presenting the information this document purports to show as absolute fact while himself also failing to source it.
The courageous former Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney makes an appearance in the video. In one section of her interview, she talks about how the U.S. financed the bin Laden family during the Soviet-Afghan war to construct the bases used to train the mujahedeen.
The video touches briefly on Khalid al-Mihdhar and Nawaf al-Hazmi, noting that they rented an apartment from an FBI informant. It does not mention the arguably much more significant fact that the CIA not only tracked the two hijackers prior to their entry into the U.S., but then allowed them to enter despite having known that they had obtained visas. That bears repeating: The CIA knew two known al-Qaeda operatives under its surveillance intended to travel to the U.S. and allowed them to do so.
John O’Neil, the former deputy director for the FBI, is also mentioned as an example of government complicity in blocking terrorism investigations. O’Neil quit his job out of frustration at his investigations into terrorism being blocked to become head of security for the World Trade Center. He was killed on 9/11 while helping to ensure the safety of others after the planes hit the buildings.
Fabled Enemies then looks at a few other indications that the Bush administration, which has a serious conflict of interest with the Bush family’s tight relationship with Saudi Arabia and the bin Laden family, reined in investigators who tried to look at Saudi financing for terrorist groups like al Qaeda. It includes a snippet from one of Greg Palast’s investigative reports showing that the FBI had been obstructed from investigating Omar and Abdullah bin Laden for their involvement in a suspected terrorist organization.
It spends a bit of time looking at the story of Robin Wright, who went public about an FBI operation called “Vulgar Betrayal” that revealed Saudi financing of terrorist groups and that U.S. banks looked the other way as terrorist money flowed through the financial system. The FBI responded by demoting and trying to silence him.
Echoing an aspect made famous by Michael Moore’s Fahrenheit 911, Bermas notes that members of the bin Laden family were collected by private charter jet and whisked out of the country immediately following the attacks.
Bermas then moves on to look at the military intelligence operation “Able Danger” that reportedly identified hijackers, including Mohammed Atta, prior to 9/11. Although it was given the operation files the 9/11 Commission Report is silent on the matter and agents who have tried to come forward to bring this information to light have been gagged.
The video then moves on to discuss one of the great unanswered questions of 9/11, that, although receiving widespread attention on the Internet, has not been given a similar amount of attention by documentaries dealing with 9/11. Bermas does a good job of helping to correct that by going into some detail about the uncovering of a huge Israeli intelligence operation within the United States.
He begins with the story of the five Israelis seen celebrating the smoking trade center towers who were later arrested and deported after it was revealed that at least a couple of them were Mossad agents.
Bermas then looks at the story of the Israeli “art student” spy ring that was blown wide open in a four part series by Carl Cameron on Fox News. Numerous Israeli intelligence operatives operating under the cover of students selling art had targeted government officials, including members of intelligence and law enforcement agencies, prior to 9/11. The operation was discovered and 60 or more operatives were rounded up and deported.
In one of Cameron’s reports, he looks at how U.S. investigators had looked at the Israeli company Amdocs, which does the billing for most U.S. phone companies. It was feared that billing data could easily end up in foreign hands. Investigators were similarly concerned with another Israeli company, Comverse Infosys, which was responsible for wiretapping for U.S. law enforcement agencies. There were indications that information obtained from wiretaps was being leaked and the fear was that a “back door” in the Comverse system allowing the company access was being or could be exploited.
Bermas makes a leap of logic here. Fox News reported that investigators of the Israeli spy ring were concerned about a connection to 9/11, but that the information linking the Israelis to 9/11 was classified. From that, Bermas asserts that the Israelis were tracking the 9/11 hijackers. From Cameron’s reports and other information this is not an unreasonable assumption, but Bermas takes it a step further, asserting as fact that Israel had warned the hijackers. This is perhaps the most serious weakness in the video.
Another under-reported aspect of 9/11 is the story of former FBI contract translator Sibel Edmonds, who has been gagged for trying to go public with information she obtained while working for the FBI that there were agents within the government acquiring nuclear technology to be sold on the black market. Bermas does not spend a lot of time educating viewers on her story, but, importantly, does introduce it to those who may not have been familiar with Ms. Edmonds before watching Fabled Enemies.
Bermas also addresses the matter of the head of Pakistan’s Inter-Service Intelligence agency Mahmud Ahmed having authorized the transfer of $100,000 to hijacker Mohammed Atta just prior to the attacks. Ahmed was in Washington on September 11th, where he met with his CIA counterpart, George Tenet. He was having breakfast as the planes crashed into the towers with Bob Graham and Porter Goss, who would later chair the Congressional Joint Inquiry into 9/11. This was a vital piece of the puzzle that had been grievously excluded from 9/11 documentaries until 9/11 Press for Truth, perhaps the overall best 9/11 film to date, corrected that situation.
Graham later said, “I was surprised at the evidence that there were foreign governments involved in facilitating the activities of at least some of the terrorists in the United States. I am stunned that we have not done a better job of pursuing that,” adding that there is credible evidence that the terrorists were assisted “by a foreign government.”
Bermas takes the opportunity here to observe that this is a further demonstration of how the 9/11 Commission was a whitewash, but neglects to inform viewers precisely why this is so; the Commission report, despite having received the information on Mahmud Ahmed, stated that there was no such evidence and, incredibly, that the question of who financed the terrorists “is of little practical significance.”
But he demonstrates the absurdity of considering the Commission a real investigation into 9/11 by noting other aspects of its ridiculousness, such as by featuring former Commission member Max Cleland, who wanted the Commission to subpoena the FAA, Norad, and the White House. But the White House would review any documents and choose a minority of them to be shared with the Commission. Only a minority of the Commission members selected by the White House would be allowed access to those documents. And only information cleared by the White House could be shared by those selected individuals with the rest of the Commission.
While demonstrating the corruption and incompetence of government officials, Bermas also presents courageous leaders like Cynthia McKinney and Dennis Kucinich standing up and speaking out. This is an important note as the video then turns to the question of prior knowledge of the attacks and the warnings that had been received in advance.
Vice President Dick Cheney is shown warning others in government to “be very cautious not to seek political advantage” by “making incendiary suggestions” about the Bush administration, like suggesting that “the White House had advance information that would have prevented the tragic attacks of 9/11.”
Fabled Enemies goes a long way towards showing the ridiculousness of Cheney saying there was no information that could have led to the prevention of the attacks.
Bermas then gets into the numerous military and intelligence exercises that were taking place on the morning of 9/11, including drills which simulated the hijackings of airplanes, and shows evidence of how these exercises served to confuse FAA flight traffic controllers and to delay the NORAD response. Bush is shown saying, “No one in our government … could have imagined flying airplanes into buildings [pause] on such a massive scale.” Bermas does a good job of demonstrating the absurdity of that statement as well, including by showing that one or more of the drills held on 9/11 actually simulated that exact scenario.
Fabled Enemies next spends a considerable amount of time on the alleged “threat” to Air Force One, granting that “threat” more credibility than it perhaps deserves in an attempt to insinuate that Cheney or someone acting under him had leaked information to terrorists enabling them to target Bush. Viewers would have been better served had this dubious speculation been omitted and other more credible and well documented arguments granted more favor.
Next, the anthrax attacks are briefly discussed; another aspect of 9/11 deserving more attention than it has received in documentaries on the subject.
Bermas sensibly concludes by saying that it is not a revolution, but a restoration of the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights that is required.
In the end, I was pleasantly surprised with Fabled Enemies. The final edition of Loose Change, a huge improvement over its predecessors, had apparently benefited from the knowledge and fact-checking of David Ray Griffin, who served as a consultant on the that video. Fabled Enemies does an even better job of sticking more to the facts and drawing reasonable conclusions, which might perhaps be in part the influence of producer Alex Jones.
Fabled Enemies also covers a much broader range of the many aspects of 9/11 requiring further investigation than most other films on the subject. This is one of the benefits of having dealt only briefly with WTC 7 and no time at all with the other towers’ collapses, events which have been exhaustively covered in numerous other videos, have in many regards served only to discredit the 9/11 Truth movement, and which have regrettably overshadowed the countless other important pieces of information about 9/11 that researchers have brought to light.
Jason Bermas does the 9/11 Truth movement a great service by choosing to finally bring much of this important information into one place and presenting it in a medium that can effectively reach a wide audience.
Watch the film online here
-
- Social bookmarks
- Email this article
-
- Print this page
- Share on Twitter
October 13th, 2008 at 12:15 pm
Criticisms of Fabled Enemies.
Jason Bermas is a great guy and does 9/11 Truth great service, so please take this a constructive criticism.
I have yet to watch Fabled Enemies entirely because I do not find its presentation engaging. I have started watching it twice and turned it off because it fails to hold my interest. Part of my lack of attention is certainly the fact that I am already familiar with most of the content presented, but redundancy is not the real problem with Fabled Enemies.
The main issue is Bermas’s style of narration is weak compared with Alex Jones or Dylan Avery. It seems to lack the intensity, emotion or other hooks necessary to capture the viewer. Other problems seem to include that lack of development of themes, transitions and graphics. In particular, I had expected Jason Bermas to go into much further detail about the development of the official story before tearing it down with the real evidence. Perhaps that would be better for another movie, but suffice it to say that the I found the introduction of Fabled Enemies to be weak and its transition to the hijackers cumbersome.
In short, even though Fabled Enemies presents facts that are new to me and the intelligence networks angle is something I am very interested in, this movie lacks the drive and intensity of classics like Terrorstorm of Loose Change 2nd. Edition which engage viewers.
October 13th, 2008 at 12:18 pm
GREAT JOB BERMUS – I loved your film and learned a lot from it.
Tarpley’s book 911 Synthetic Terror is also a must.
God bless you bro !
October 13th, 2008 at 12:29 pm
Fabled Enemies is a perfect video exposing the truth behind the OTHER aspects of 9/11. There are tons of people guilty of TREASON. It’s too bad that America does not know how to stand up for itself. All elected officials should be voted out of office for not participating and pushing the Impeachment of Bush and Cheney. Unfortunately that leaves Nancy Peloski as President, but it’s a broad statement that just because you are President, you are not above the law.
If you have not seen the film, it is a must watch! Great review!
October 13th, 2008 at 12:38 pm
Jason posits the idea that it wasn’t just Israel’s Mossad, it was also our government, Pakistan, Great Britian, etc…but he overlooks the fact that the same folk in the different nations point to an underlying group…in other words, there is a layer below the nation-states that he is not examining, for whatever reason.
October 13th, 2008 at 12:39 pm
This is a pretty fair review of the film. If Bermas had made all of the recommended changes, however, the film would have been hours longer and would have completely inundated the novice viewers. Compromises must be made and I feel that Bermas made a wise choice not to compromise the truth. We have distributed 200 copies of this film so far around Rochester and hope to do more in the coming weeks. Well done.
October 13th, 2008 at 12:58 pm
bofors……. I’d like to see your version please…..
October 13th, 2008 at 1:22 pm
Jason knocked this one out of the park exposing the perps involved in 9/11. May God continue to bless you and protect you from all harm.
October 13th, 2008 at 1:23 pm
I think its dry. I mean the info is great, but I had a hard-time watching it all the way through..
October 13th, 2008 at 2:05 pm
GLAM SLAM!!! THANKS MR.BERMAS!!!!!!!
October 13th, 2008 at 2:23 pm
WOW! I can’t understand how anyone, even bofors couldn’t be completely engaged by Fabled Enemies!
This was a mindblowing film for me, and I’m very hard to please when it comes to good films. It’s a must see for all people!
Now, I believe Loose Change 2nd edition was the best of the three LC’s. I was a little disappointed by Final Cut, as I was expecting to see everything from LC 1 and 2, with new information added. Loose Change Final Cut lacked alot of the hardcore 911 evidence which was contained in 1 and 2, so it forces people to watch all 3 instead of simply having an updated complete version.
Now, for people who are reading this and about to attack me, I in now way am saying I could have done a better job, and I greatly appreciate the efforts these guys have put into these films. NOW GO WATCH TERRORSTORM AND 911 ROAD TO TYRANNY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
October 13th, 2008 at 2:47 pm
Fabled Enemies is a must get DVD and a must see. Google did not suddenly take it off the ratings radar for no reason. Jason touched on areas so close to center of 9/11, they tried to suppress it. ALL THE MORE REASON TO GET THE DVD, AND PASS ON COPIES TO YOUR FRIENDS. He used the clips of the MSM very skillfully. It brings a new meaning to the expression “the enemy within”.
October 13th, 2008 at 3:04 pm
So…..Jason thinks that the government would lie and stage the planes and attacks at the Pentagon or in Shanksville? That seems fair enough….considering there is absolutely NO verifiable evidence that any plane existed at any of these locations. None what-so-ever. ZERO. Zilch. Even though the Pentagon had reports, media, eyewitnesses, video, cameras, military experts, cab drivers, and 100’s of “ordinary” citizens that say there were planes…..Jason says there wasn’t anything resembling what we were being told was there.
Ok…..though NEVER dare mention to him that the EXACT same situation exists at the Twin Towers in NYC. It will be as if you kicked him in the balls and demanded he change religions?!! The same exact evidence at the Pentagon where he doesn’t believe there were planes…..also is non-existent in NYC. ALL you have in NYC are media films and reports, dozens of “media” personalities telling and demanding that there were planes, “ordinary” citizens verifying the lie, military experts (1000’s of them were stationed in NYC on the morning of 911 for a “terrorist drill”…how convenient), cab drivers, video, cameras……all the same crap that was fed to us at the Pentagon.
What does no-planes mean in NYC? It means the media ITSELF colluded with the criminal Bush regime. They are as much responsible for 911 and its cover-up as any so-called terrorist. CNN had astonishing insight on the morning of 911 when they hired Aaron Brown and Paula Zahn just hours before the planes struck. (Interesting considering it was a Tuesday and NO NEWSANCHOR IT BROADCAST HISTORY…..had ever started their careers with a new network on a Tuesday when Monday wasn’t a holiday….and CNN did it twice in one day….on the morning of 911). Jason will go to his grave before his suggests there were no planes in NYC on 911….even though out of 13 million combined pieces of aircraft that make up all 4 of the standard 767’s that flew that morning….NOT ONE PIECE….has been verified outside the Bush White House. Not one.
October 13th, 2008 at 3:35 pm
I watched the movie and wasnt as impressed.
I agree with bofas. His style was boring, very monotonous, and the information seemed very basic, with nothing really worth noting except Barry Jennings.
Terrorstorm and Road to 9/11 are by far the best 9/11 films made
October 13th, 2008 at 4:09 pm
I just got this video in the mail the other day and have not yet had a chance to watch it. Having read this review and some other information about it, it looks to me like Jason presents a lot of the circumstantial evidence surrounding the events of 9/11. This was the approach that Michael Ruppert took with his excellent book “Crossing the Rubicon”, whom I credit with opening my eyes to 9/11 along with other conspiracies. I think if Jason is able to spread this approach to a wider audience with this video that it will go a long way to finally giving some traction to the 9/11 truth movement. Keep in mind that a lot of people, no matter how open minded they may seem, are just not ready or able to accept the fact that the individuals in the US Government killed their fellow American citizens to further their desire to go to war. I like Alex’s approach of giving people the video and saying, “Hey, I watched this the other day. Pretty wild stuff. Take a look and let me know what you think.” People are intelligent. They are capable of making up their own minds and drawing their own conclusions. This video just gives another tack to approach people with that may open more eyes.
October 13th, 2008 at 4:28 pm
okay, so if it wasnt planes Tyug, then was it a missle with wings? How about we focus on pushing back the nwo and regaining our civil libs, then we can debate weather planes hit the building or not.
October 13th, 2008 at 4:39 pm
I like Fabled Enemies.
Although, to be ‘frank’, i think Loose Change was better.
Loose Change is actually the movie that woke me up; that’s when i started investigating.
I juess Jason’s Loose Change really is the masterpiece.
About Fabled Enemies.. the voice of Jason is often a bit monotonous.. it must be more exciting for the audience. Also, it’s a little bit too much information and presented too fast.. the audience can’t follow all of it. The movie has no real point and is more like lots of info-peaces put in succession.. without a real ‘red line’ tying it together.
I think it would be a better movie with a professional speaker, a plot and better music.
Still, it’s a good movie, but not as ‘perfect’ as Loose Change.
Greetings, Frank
October 13th, 2008 at 4:58 pm
lol i love this… GOOGLE IS SUPRESSING IT SO BUY IT! NO, BUY 10!!
October 13th, 2008 at 5:22 pm
#19/20
I have often wondered that same question about counter-propaganda/disinfo. However, I cannot figure out what they would be countering and disinforming us from.
Why would the government want them to tell people and put in their heads that “the government is horrible, look at everything bad they do”?
I think over and over about it, and cannot come up with 1 good answer
October 13th, 2008 at 7:36 pm
Atually erb Alex and Jason encourage people to make copies to distribute, not buy multiple ones. If they were in it for the money would they allow and encourage copies? I think not…
What makes Alex a great leader? He’s the only one willing to risk his neck to denounce the government. How many people has he woken up, including ‘celebrities’? How many people have YOU woken up? If you’re so damn great and knowledgeable why don’t you tell us what’s what then.
October 13th, 2008 at 7:50 pm
censorship has always made content more desirable
October 13th, 2008 at 9:55 pm
erb is a flouridated moron! some people will never get it! “get the snack Kronk!” and get the hell outta here. Only Patriots of Truth need comment.
October 13th, 2008 at 10:34 pm
awsome movie and awsome article here didnt read it all buit will tomarrow, anyways just playued pool league, drove home and noticed the lights of a building, a masonically built building, light up a owl or the tower of the building, full moon also how does this ty into 911 these peoples have built buildings in every small town and city across america and for some reason the tower in ashland wis is lit up free masons are for sure alive and deficating on the people if you know a relative involved with masonic history or lineage please ask questions and document responses and see if we can together expose the reason behind these rituals. (first time gettin evidence of masons still active) by my own eyes thanks alex for havin freeman on
October 14th, 2008 at 12:32 am
I wonder what exactly “erb’s” contribution to society is.
Alex says what most of us feel, and says it far more eloquently than most I know.
“erb” can’t even afford a damn H for gadsakes…….
DTTNWO, LLTR
Great job Bermy:)
October 14th, 2008 at 12:41 am
Jason, today was the anniversary of the destruction of the Knights Templar. 400 yr anniversary I think.
Not an expert, just remember when Alex had Freeman on and Freeman had 10/13 of this year as a date to keep an eye on for some possible NWO shenanigans. Glad nothing went down, maybe the Lucifarians decided to stay home and masturbate in a coffin or somethin’.
Anyhow,
DTTNWO, LLTR
October 14th, 2008 at 1:16 am
erb take the blue pill and go back to la la land!
October 14th, 2008 at 1:23 am
Erb, if it wasn’t for Guys like Alex and Jason, the painstaking work they have done would not given many the truth, the real information that empowers knowledge that could prepare or protect oneself for the future.
I gladly purchased copies, knowing full well that it wasnt free to make that movie, and neither the countless hours of information gathering to make it.
I applaud Alex and Jason for offering something that I can recommend others to watch, without feeling shame, because I know they fight for freedom, their message is true and rightious.
I applaud them for risking their lives for the freedom of us, you. In an age where people seek to harm us and treat us like sheep, we must realise we are people, and have rights. It is the knowledge that sets us free, because we know the truth or realise the propaganda, we can join the dots.
The last 5 years I have daily read, and viewed Alex Jones, and I am forever gratefull. Because I am prepared. Why do people oppose it, its only a message.
Dont shot the messenger, just try listening to the message.
Least the message wont cause you harm, and neither would the ability to think, outside the box.
Get angry for your familys freedom they deserve, it NOBODYS business to tell you how to live. Thats what todays society lacks, the will and the backbone to lead themselves.
Your forefathers would be rolling in their graves right now.
October 14th, 2008 at 1:54 am
“Whether or ‘NOT’ a plane hit the Pentagon!!!! WTF Over??? Come and get me!!!! JHFC!!!! NO STINGER or AVENGER TEAMS…Yeah Right!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Total BuLLLshit!!! “All ‘HAIL’ Thermal Expansion!!!”
October 14th, 2008 at 5:23 am
Recognizing the enemy can be a bit tricky, depending upon what you believe and what the truth really is.
I have come to realize that reality as we experience it, depends upon the many impressions fed to us through mainstream. In many ways, we see only the snap shots and framed scenarios that have been selected and whitewashed for our vieweing. And even worse, the spin looks so real.
It reminds of the days when I used to work as a mechanic tuning up cars with a timing light. The strobe, depending upon it’s timing, can give the impression that a crank shaft is going backwards and it looks so real. Or it can appear to advance or retard the timing if it’s connected to the wrong lead and not lead #1.
Our perception of reality can similarly be controlled, depending upon how mainstream and our politicians frame the information and support it with an historical feed of snap shots, making the bad guy look good and the good guy look bad. Once that false plateau has been set into everyone’s mind, it becomes self supporting and self feeding just like we are seeing today. By manipulating the news and feeding us all a false paradigm, our entire belief system and values can be “transplanted” into a false paradigm that looks real.
There is no doubt in my mind that shadow government and psyopps has most everyone hypnotized with a type of timing light called mainstream news, which can make the world appear to be upside down and rotating in reverse, just to win an election and control our minds. And it goes without saying that once the masses detatch from the real reality, they become disoriented, very stressed out and this is then used to justify agendas.
I can’t think of anything more harmful to the human psychee than manipulating false paradigms and in the end most will realize it is the very cause of everything that has ever gone wrong with humanity, from insanity to the mass insanity of religions and wars.
Right about now, they got the engine of each person timed 180 degrees opposite timing and all’s this can do is cause mental and physical diseases to the max and I for one am not laughing about any of this. This form of abuse is UNCONSCIONABLE & ABOMINABLE!!!
Kudos Jason, good job and it feels really good to get back to TDC(top dead center on the flywheel), or at least recognize what the problem is with our maligned frame of news, that’s as bad as a strobe light that’s way off the mark!!!
Man oh man, they are really f’n with us big time and they know exactly what they are doing for things to get this bad!!!
Imagine that, they are hijacking our minds and using that to hot-wire(steal) the works, worse than a horse thief!!! This is what our government has been up to???!!! When do the Nazis and communists arrive???
October 14th, 2008 at 6:04 am
#33
Your engine timing strobe example is inspired. I remember seeing this as a child and could not understand how come the spinning pully looked like it had stopped. Similar effect to video of driving past a fence.
Another example of something that seems real is what a Digital Camera can see. You can’t see the LED on the TV remote since it’s Infra red. However look at it through a digital camera and it’s as bright as any blue LED. This is a great one to demonstrate and explain that there is more to the world than you can see with your own eyes. I took a photo of a 4 year old child (a dangerous thing to do these days, a good citizen my report you) and showed her the picture on my camera, she commented that her dress was the wrong colour in my photo. An early lesson that what is on TV is not the same as reality, it just looks real when you don’t know better.
So what should I be reported for, taking a photo of a 4 year old or corrupting her mind with subversive dissent that could groom her into an info warrior?
October 14th, 2008 at 7:41 am
This reviewer obviously hasn’t seen Loose Change: Final Cut other wise he’d know it’s NOT the 3rd and final cut, but an entirely new film with a misleading title.
October 14th, 2008 at 9:03 am
This was my plea to get peeps to watch FABLED ENEMIES….
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nYBwkum2OLU
Jason, I loved both FABLED ENEMIES and LOOSE CHANGE FINAL CUT. Keep up the great work and I will keep passing out the DVDs.
October 14th, 2008 at 9:10 am
Wayland, I would say for taking the photo you fucken freak pedophile, go get help! BTW your idiotic comment is not confusing anyone here, go peddle your misinformation and your pedophilia some place else… you FREAK.
October 14th, 2008 at 11:13 am
I thought it was masterfully done in thought provoking style! A solid 9 out of 10!
Thanks Jason, and please, keep up the good work!
October 14th, 2008 at 11:27 am
It’s very good intro to the movement, truth rising is a bit more entertaining
Terrorstorm is the masterpiece of the films made about the movement
for some incredible lyics google JOSH RIZEBERG
October 14th, 2008 at 6:26 pm
Jason you hit it right out of the park with this documentary! Of course anyone who has seen this film and hasn’t had the scales removed from their eyes are basically never going to wake up!
October 15th, 2008 at 4:00 am
This movie was TERRIBLE, complete waste of time and money. Watch 9/11 Ripple Effect instead.
I agree that 9/11 was a false flag op, but 9/11 Truth is turning into a joke.
It’s been 7 YEARS and there is still no interviews put on dvd or youtube with the 14 PEOPLE who all heard and felt a HUGE explosion along with William Rodriguez on Sub Basement Level 1 before the 1st plane even hit. The explosion from below that pushed them upwards. Get Philipe David the burned man on sub basement level 2 on film too, but mainly ALL 14 WITNESSES. One guy’s word is NOT enough, we need CORROBORATING evidence, get these 14 PEOPLE interviewed and put it on youtube and dvd ASAP!!!!
Nice investigation skills guys. Why isn’t Richard Gage, Webster Tarpley, Paul Craig Roberts, Alex Jones interviewing these 14 KEY WITNESSES??? Too busy whining about Paulson’s bailout, we get the point, we got royally screwed. And fuck Ron Paul for not running as an INDEPENDENT, what a huge waste of time and money his campaign turned out to be, I’m still going to vote for him with a write in vote though because he’s WAAAAY better than Obama or McCain.
There was some great info in Fabled Enemies though, like Flight 23, the war games with UAV a couple months before 9/11 Amal-Virg, James Woods interview, Barry Jennings interview, but the film maker has ZERO talent, it was a very dry and boring movie. It should’ve been a book. The guy who wrote this review is way off too, Loose Change Final Cut was a MILLION times better than Fabled Enemies! Loose Change Final Cut should be rereleased under a new title and include the Barry Jenning’s interview! Comletely CHANGE THE NAME OF THE MOVIE, it is NOTHING like the first two Loose Change movies, which is what a lot of skeptics think. They think there was just some minor editing, like when someone does a 3rd edition of their book. Give it a new name aside from Loose Change!!!
Sorry to be such an asshole, but my patience is starting to wear thin, the elite have us in checkmate and nobody can do a goddamn thing about it!
Fuck Fabled Enemies, I’m pissed that I wasted my money on it!
Watch the new Zeitgeist instead, it is a fucking masterpiece! (and only $5)
http://video.google.com/videop.....7695921912
October 15th, 2008 at 11:53 am
People talk to your families in the military and tell them to fight before it is too late, you have a very short window of opportunity and your elections will never happen USA. this is your last chance. Join the movement called resistance against the NWO before it is to late and do talk to the sons and daughters of America and let them see that their country is over and the freedom that the forefathers have signed on that declaration of independence is being taken away by greed and money and America will be no more as it was. it’s like no one warned you dumb f&$%#n people!!!! are you sitting on your brains or you have to wait till someone staps you????? i can see it from a foreigners aspect people.
October 15th, 2008 at 1:25 pm
If everyone really believes all of this nonsense, then Alex should take the lead and start filing some lawsuits to get to the bottom of all of this. It’s America, there should be plenty of attorneys willing to take up the cause.
October 17th, 2008 at 3:31 am
For the first time yesterday; I was able to track down and find ‘Fabled Enemies’ and ‘Truth Rising’,
I think ‘Fabled Enemies’ is something that the elder generation might like better, narrated by a soft-spoken ‘intellectual’ as Bermas sounds, I have no complaints, I can see that ‘Truth Rising’, is more of a ‘Right-in-yer-face’ kind of documentary- that the more active, younger crowd would appreciate, I do highly appreciate both of these films.
BTW I am going to go see, ‘W.’ tomorrow (without throwing anything at the silverscreen or yelling out random insults, possibly at the end,,, not sure yet..?)
Rumour: That the next ‘Oliver Stone’ feature may be a part two; to his latest film ‘W.’
Which if it is a success- might possibly be entitled- “W.W.III” or “What’s Eating G.W.’s Grapes?”
October 17th, 2008 at 6:24 am
People That Visit This Site, & TRUST what you see should realize that only articles & comments which NEVER address the REAL TRUTH are permitted here ! I posted at least 30 detailed and TRUTHFUL comments, & they are all gone ! ~ This Is A Test. If They DO allow this post, it will be to prove me wrong, but where are the other 30 ? In Alex Jones’ trash bin !
October 17th, 2008 at 5:05 pm
“pictures” or ‘it’ never happened….
October 18th, 2008 at 1:59 am
Personally, I would rather watch a documentary where the host was soft spoken and thoughtful, rather than someone just being bombastic, trying to stir up your emotions without much thought involved.
Fabled Enemies is a very good documentary, as are Alex’s documentaries.
Alex is much more intelligent and thoughtful in his documentaries than he is on the air.
October 18th, 2008 at 7:39 am
Jason Bermas was on Alex Jones show yesterday and he made some really good points about Zeigteist Addendum, I remember when Bermas interviewed Peter about a year ago, and thought he did a good job. I would love to see Bermas and Peter do a debate.
Why has Peter Joseph’s wikipedia page been deleted at least 3 times????? Is he trying to hide something???
What is the name of the U.N. Christ who is in Zeitgeist Addendum? Is he the guy who makes the triangle with his hand? That was kind of creepy. Paul Joseph Watson or Alex should write a detailed review of the movie.
I hope Peter isn’t a satanist, a lot of them are atheist, like Anton Lavey, or pretend to be atheist.
I don’t know what to think, or who to trust anymore. I still love parts of Zeitgeist, the part on 9/11, the part on the Fed, the 1st half of Zeitgeist Addendum, which even Edward Griffin liked a lot. I’m not so sure about the rest anymore. That was pretty lame at the end of Zeitgeist Addendum when all the religious people get rid of their crosses and hats. How disrespectful. Peter overplayed his hand, it screamed ulterior motive. Pushing a one world religion and communism.
Alex should have this guy on his show:
Zeitgeist Debunked Part 1 of 10:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ej_coXEnKEI
October 19th, 2008 at 9:13 am
Lets hope he encourages people to continue dropping various useless religious articles from their attire. Religion is no different than the fed. A controlling body. There’s no room for religion in paradise.
October 19th, 2008 at 9:20 am
You guys can bash and debunk all you want. The most important issue of Joseph’s film was to point out that we have the potential to turn earth into a paradise, which is 100% non fiction with current technology.
The problem is, the people with God on their brains, which is like the majority of Americans think that we all have to die a horrible death to achieve this paradise. Nonsense. Anyone who truely believes that should not even bother coming to this website becaise logic and reason are Alex’s driving force with everything else as a distant second.
October 19th, 2008 at 11:37 pm
I haven’t seen anything lately regarding the history of structural problems the twin towers were trying to deal with, for quite some time. Apparently the new type of construction done with pre-welded sections didn’t resist the wind stresses, the opon floor occupant load, and possible foundation settling. Not to mention the required and soon to begin billion dollar asbestos removal project.