EXCLUSIVE: Physics Professor Reports WTC Destroyed by Controlled Demolition

Infowars.com | November 11, 2005
By Steven E. Jones

In my formal paper, I call attention to glaring weaknesses in the "final" reports funded by the US government and show evidences for a likely
alternative hypothesis. In particular, the official theory lacks repeatability in that no actual models or buildings (before or since 9-11-01) have been observed to completely collapse due to the proposed fire-based mechanisms.

On the other hand, dozens of buildings have been completely and symmetrically demolished through the use of pre-positioned explosives. The "explosive demolition" hypothesis better satisfies tests of repeatability and parsimony and therefore is not "junk science." It ought to be seriously, scientifically investigated and debated. A truly independent, international panel would consider all viable hypotheses, including the pre-positioned-explosives theory, guided not by politicized notions and constraints, but rather by observations and calculations.

Thank you for the opportunity to discuss these issues on your
radio show. I invite listeners and readers to read my paper. This is your
homework for today:

Prof. Jones' Article Questioning the 'Official Story' of 9/11


Sincerely,

Professor Steven E. Jones
Department of Physics and Astronomy
Brigham Young University
Provo, UT 84604

<< HOME