
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bill to Audit Fed Gains Serious Momentum</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.infowars.com/bill-to-audit-fed-gains-serious-momentum/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.infowars.com/bill-to-audit-fed-gains-serious-momentum/</link>
	<description>Because there's a war on for your mind.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 22:55:36 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhonda</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/bill-to-audit-fed-gains-serious-momentum/comment-page-4/#comment-1058004</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhonda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 03:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=11288#comment-1058004</guid>
		<description>It is time to say good night.

Rhonda
June 4, 2009/Thursday</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is time to say good night.</p>
<p>Rhonda<br />
June 4, 2009/Thursday</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhonda</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/bill-to-audit-fed-gains-serious-momentum/comment-page-4/#comment-1058001</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhonda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 03:10:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=11288#comment-1058001</guid>
		<description>John1210,

     Thank you. I tried to do it just right.

Rhonda
June 4, 2009/Thursday</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>John1210,</p>
<p>     Thank you. I tried to do it just right.</p>
<p>Rhonda<br />
June 4, 2009/Thursday</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhonda</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/bill-to-audit-fed-gains-serious-momentum/comment-page-4/#comment-1050737</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhonda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 02:32:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=11288#comment-1050737</guid>
		<description>Night and management</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Night and management</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John1210</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/bill-to-audit-fed-gains-serious-momentum/comment-page-4/#comment-1050467</link>
		<dc:creator>John1210</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2009 01:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=11288#comment-1050467</guid>
		<description>Very nice site!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice site!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhonda</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/bill-to-audit-fed-gains-serious-momentum/comment-page-4/#comment-1040141</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhonda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 23:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=11288#comment-1040141</guid>
		<description>Management (It is now verifying that my last attempt hours ago is still being held in the filter bin by telling me this is a duplicate. Therefore once again I will add something--this being it, then go to another page and see what happens from that point on.)

Rhonda
May 29, 2009/Friday</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Management (It is now verifying that my last attempt hours ago is still being held in the filter bin by telling me this is a duplicate. Therefore once again I will add something&#8211;this being it, then go to another page and see what happens from that point on.)</p>
<p>Rhonda<br />
May 29, 2009/Friday</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhonda</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/bill-to-audit-fed-gains-serious-momentum/comment-page-4/#comment-1037559</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhonda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 03:27:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=11288#comment-1037559</guid>
		<description>Night Management</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Night Management</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhonda</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/bill-to-audit-fed-gains-serious-momentum/comment-page-4/#comment-1037534</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhonda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 03:14:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=11288#comment-1037534</guid>
		<description>Management (Interesting how this is noticing what was put here days ago since it will not let me submit this, yet it at least took the last one into the filter section as the rejection.....Now this has changed it enough to try to submit it.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Management (Interesting how this is noticing what was put here days ago since it will not let me submit this, yet it at least took the last one into the filter section as the rejection&#8230;..Now this has changed it enough to try to submit it.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhonda</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/bill-to-audit-fed-gains-serious-momentum/comment-page-4/#comment-1037499</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhonda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 03:04:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=11288#comment-1037499</guid>
		<description>Night</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Night</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: guardian</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/bill-to-audit-fed-gains-serious-momentum/comment-page-4/#comment-1034797</link>
		<dc:creator>guardian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 15:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=11288#comment-1034797</guid>
		<description>night management</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>night management</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rhonda</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/bill-to-audit-fed-gains-serious-momentum/comment-page-4/#comment-1031021</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhonda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 07:28:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=11288#comment-1031021</guid>
		<description>Roaddog,

     First off, I thought that maybe I saw a link that allows you to delete your own comments here, but it is not here. Next, I wonder if you clicked on the &quot;Notify me of follow-up comments via e-mail&quot; box because even though you replied to me, you did it under your own comment which means that you would have received the notification instead of me. Well, my reply to you was the last one under the original comment and anything further said would either have to be a new comment that would not be sent to me or it would have be made under one of my previous comments to get back to me. Seems like you are allowed four replies making it a total of five in a comment, including the original. Not bad. Got to give Alex Jones credit for having this designed this way. Of course that is if people reply under a the next reply. Otherwise you can reply as many times as you want, as far as I know, if you keep on replying under the same comment, which ever one that might be. That is just incase a hundred people might want to say something about the same comment. Fancy, huh?

Rhonda</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roaddog,</p>
<p>     First off, I thought that maybe I saw a link that allows you to delete your own comments here, but it is not here. Next, I wonder if you clicked on the &#8220;Notify me of follow-up comments via e-mail&#8221; box because even though you replied to me, you did it under your own comment which means that you would have received the notification instead of me. Well, my reply to you was the last one under the original comment and anything further said would either have to be a new comment that would not be sent to me or it would have be made under one of my previous comments to get back to me. Seems like you are allowed four replies making it a total of five in a comment, including the original. Not bad. Got to give Alex Jones credit for having this designed this way. Of course that is if people reply under a the next reply. Otherwise you can reply as many times as you want, as far as I know, if you keep on replying under the same comment, which ever one that might be. That is just incase a hundred people might want to say something about the same comment. Fancy, huh?</p>
<p>Rhonda</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
