Prison Plant TV Fall of the Republic
  • Miads Resources
    Listen to Alex Jones
    Fall of the Republic
    Ecoloblue
    Survival Seeds
    Silver Solution
    Frontsite
    OxySilver
    10-in-One
    Heart and Body
    Podcast
    fall of the republic and endgame
    New Infowars shirts are in
    The Illuminati
    Great messages
  • Brit homebuyers face questions on alcohol and smoking under new mortgage rules

    • Text size
    • Larger
    • Smaller

    Times Online
    October 19, 2009

    Homebuyers could be forced to provide detailed information about the amount of money they spend on alcohol each month to qualify for a new mortgage under a new clampdown on reckless lending.

    In a sweeping review of the mortgage market published today, the Financial Services Authority (FSA) said lenders needed to be far more rigorous about their financial checks of potential borrowers.

    It said lenders should delve deeper into homebuyers’ personal spending including the amount they spend on alcohol and tobacco.

    Spending on shoes, clothes and childcare could also be assessed under a new, industry-wide “affordability test”.

    Read entire article

    • Social bookmarks
    • Social bookmarks
    • Email this article
    • Email this article
    • Print this page
    • Share on Twitter

    Be prepared

    Comment Rules

    45 Responses to “Brit homebuyers face questions on alcohol and smoking under new mortgage rules”

    1. MAD DOG Says:

      WELL THEN YOU BUY A LOWER PRICED FIXER UPPER ON LAND CONTRACT AND BANKS BE DAMNED.

      THATS WHAT I DID.

      NOW ALL THE INTREST I PAY GOES TO THE OWNER, NOT SOME FAT CAT.

      BANKS WILL FAIL IF PEOPLE STOP USING THEM.

      Vote Third Party Reply:

      You can just lie and say you don’t drink or smoke. They wouldn’t know the difference nosy bastards.

      http://www.Vote3rdPartyNow.org

      sumsrent Reply:

      What gets me is all these paranoid non-smokers supporting all these bans on tobacco…

      And yet, when it becomes payday they don’t give a second thought to hitting the smoke filled bars and clubs to get a whore.

      The point is… they don’t want to be around smoke, but then will submit themselves to it to fulfill their needs.

      I’d bet that… half those oppossing smokers probably smoke dope!

      The Dude Reply:

      Or smoke pole.

      Gandhi Reply:

      They did it again, picture of a hot babe with her lips around a cylindrical item. Then the article has no more good pictures. uggg.

      Questioner Reply:

      and what’s wrong with smoking dope? much safer than tobacco, so shove it.

      joe blow Reply:

      i’m guessing they smoke turds in hell

      Curt Reply:

      …That is until the spies at the utility company report you.

      THE WATCHER Reply:

      What happens if they catch you screwing?

      sudburychange Reply:

      No more unauthorized sex without a permit.

      rEvolutionary Reply:

      Hahaha, here in the midwest it’s literally illegal to get a blowjob, even in your own home. I mean, can it get any deeper? Land of the free, right? Right to the pursuit of happiness anyone??

      Griz Reply:

      I don’t know where you live in the midwest, but around here finding out who’s doing who is dangerous. We shoot at peeping toms, with or without badges!

    2. mike Says:

      AMERICA NEEDS A LITTLE BIT OF THIS JUST WAKE YOU FAT ASSES UP . SPREAD THE WORD YOU DUMMIES. WHEN U READ THIS , PASS THE FRIGGN, WORD ON CAUSE TO MANY PEOPLE ARE ON A DESPERATE HOUSWIVE DANCING WITH THE STARS HIGH IN LALA LAND.
      WAKE THE #### UP!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

      JaneTheCarpenter Reply:

      I know what your feeling. What kills me is that some of this stuff is as plain as the nose on their face. WAKE UP !!! Make’s me just want to shake some of them to wake them UP!

    3. Tom Says:

      Get me out of this country!! its sinking fast

      JaneTheCarpenter Reply:

      It’s happening all over the world, We’re just going to get it the worst for now!

    4. Gary Says:

      If there were any “clampdown on reckless lending” based upon anything relevant, it should be that the banks have to answer the question, “Do you actually have cash funds physically on deposit to cover this loan or not?” If they don’t, they should be prosecuted for fraud. Of course, that would mean the end of the entire banking “industry” which exists by means of a fractional reserve ponzi scheme that lends non-existent money at interest, but that’s exactly my point.

      joe blow Reply:

      if they have cash funds physically on deposit to cover the loan why would they need the loan?

    5. will Says:

      These people need a 1776 experience. It will vastly improve their lives.

      Gary Reply:

      Just hold onto your shorts a while longer. First, we need a 1770 experience:

      http://www.bostonmassacre.net/

      JP Reply:

      Excellent point Gary.

      cornelius Reply:

      When the US revolution happened, can anyone tell me what happened to the leaders of the day. Were they hung?
      Were they given life sentences?
      Or did they just fade into the background for their ancesters to take the reigns?

      S1 Reply:

      What, we need to loose some of our North American colonies again? Didn’t make much difference the last time it happened.

    6. Ryan Says:

      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTv6GRDINjY My call into the Neal Boortz show where he trashes 911 truth and Alex Jones on September 11th. I slip in Operation Northwoods after the delay.

    7. steven Says:

      Sharpen your pitch forks folks!

    8. Tom Says:

      She sure has a pretty mouth. :)

      Gary Reply:

      Lucky cigarette. ;)

    9. Al Koppel Says:

      This is simply to know all about you which a lawful government doesn’t have to do as the citizens vote to approve how their country is run and governments can not be run in ’secrecy’ as to misrepresent the public as the law of the land is a terrorist act that over-throws governments paid tax money to protect, and to serve the citizenry, their families and properties! We must remember that in other countries today they have no mortgages as the people pay cash on the barrel head for their homes and properties to keep governments out of their privacy. No receipts, no illegal taxes utilized to spy against them!

      Invasion of privacy is malice carried out with criminal intent and is punishable in this United States as a high crime under U.S. Federal and State laws, as well as under the laws represented by the International Criminal Court! -Al Koppel.

    10. ophiuchus Says:

      Make a deal with “ownersellers” at zero interest… keep the banksters out…. it works i’ve done it

    11. Gundoswvy Says:

      Aloha! tmb

    12. Gundospwv Says:

      Aloha! pik

    13. jmc Says:

      next will be asked..how many times do you shit a week? a cctv cam will be set in the drain to make sure you only use one square of t.p. and wipe counter clockwise…why are we still on rubber tires?

    14. oldtreeoutatsea Says:

      “Homebuyers could”
      Get back to me, when homebuyers shall.

    15. INGSOCtraitor Says:

      What’s all the fuss about being severely scrutinized by the BANKSTERS?
      You have no rights and certainly no FCUK’n money, else you wouldn’t be needing a loan.
      They already own you. So just sit down, sign your stupid life away, and shut up!

      Long live FATHER! Long live INGSOC!

    16. fellow warior Says:

      the whole world is becoming a second world war ghetto
      do i smoke drink do drugs non of your bussines capice!

      Highlanderess Reply:

      Ain’t that the truth!

    17. fellow warior Says:

      keep your stinking money

    18. Highlanderess Says:

      Banksters are truly the root of all evil!

      mike65 Reply:

      GOOD one HIGHlanderess.

    19. Commieobamie Says:

      Another obamie COMMUNIST plot to control everyone and everything. Don’t ya all just LOVE your grocery store NAZI CARDS that record everything you buy?!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    20. Hoshioni Says:

      its sad…i knew credit was bad when my father explianed it in two sentances.
      common sence just seems like a superpower nowadays

    21. Paul Says:

      sumsrent – regarding smoking..in the UK smoking indoors in a public place, like a bar or club.. is illegal so no..people dont subject themselves to it.

    22. anti- terorrist Says:

      It would make more sense to check medical records.
      I’ve had form filling allergy all my life. Just not the box ticker type.
      Anyway if you didn’t smoke and drink before you had a morgage you soon will through the constant pressure of trying to pay it each month.

    23. tello Says:

      Im glad they arnt asking us how much we are spending on ammo and for that matter fucken rubbers cuz who the fuck would bring a life into this fucked up mess

    24. mrazpatriot Says:

      The answer to 1984 is 1776. What is it going to take for the masses to wake the hell up and do something? They want to know everything, and everything is quite frankly , {None of their fucking business}!