 |
 |
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
|
|||
 |
|||
|
|||
 |
|||
|
Brookings Publication mentions possibility of ‘Horrific Provocation’ to Trigger Iran Invasion
- Text size
Jurriaan Maessen
Prisonplanet.com
June 29, 2009
In a recent policy paper published by the influential Brookings Institute, the authors propose almost anything to guarantee dominance of Persia by the new world order, including bribery, lying, cheating and mass murdering by an all-out military assault of Iran. The paper ‘Which path to Persia: Options for a New American Strategy toward Iran’ is just one of many recent and not so recent examples of the firm intent of the globalists to engage Iran militarily and acquire its natural resources in the same effort.
The group of authors- a cozy little convergence of globalists- contemplate four separate options on ‘how to deal with Iran’ in the cold bureaucratic language that poses as scientific but is really nothing more than the intelligent musings of a calculating psychopath. The first option, ‘Dissuading Tehran’ through diplomatic means is being discussed as something tried, tested and discarded. The second option, ‘Disarming Tehran’ covers several ways of rallying the ‘international community’ around the globalists’ intentions. In the third part, ‘Toppling Tehran’ the warmongering increases as the writers contemplate both covert and overt military action against the Islamic republic of Iran. In the fourth and last section, ‘Deterring Tehran’ the option of ‘containment’ is elaborated upon. The proposed final strategy predictably involves all of the above mentioned options, in roughly the same order of appearance.
To ensure the cooperation of surrounding countries, the authors propose bribery as an effective tool. After the authors assert that ‘it may be necessary to cut some deals in order to secure Moscow’s support for a tougher Iran policy’, the authors continue with their ‘brainstorming’, advising a widespread bribery campaign in order to ensure international cooperation in regards to Iran:
‘Other countries also will want payoffs from the United States in return for their assistance on Iran. Such deals may be distasteful, but many will be unavoidable if the Persuasion approach is to have a reasonable chance of succeeding.’ And further on: ‘To be successful, a Persuasion approach would invariably require unpleasant compromises with third-party countries to secure their cooperation against Iran.’
This means the US will have to cut all kinds of deals with dictators, bloodthirsty local tyrants and other corrupt kings of Arabia- even facilitating them with weapons. Besides rallying the ‘international community’ around the Anglo-American establishment with the help of these ‘unpleasant compromises’, the paper stresses it will also be necessary to persuade the Iranians themselves to topple their government (page 39):
‘Inciting regime change in Iran would be greatly assisted by convincing the Iranian people that their government is so ideologically blinkered that it refuses to do what is best for the people and instead clings to a policy that could only bring ruin on the country.’
But the authors underline the necessity of creating a favourable climate for the transnationalists in which to operate.
- A d v e r t i s e m e n t
Here the authors seem to abandon even the facade of civility as they proceed. Even though the authors put these vile warmongering words in quotes, they cannot mask the mindset. They mean to rally the ‘international community’ through bribery and deceit- as a steppingstone towards military strikes. The path toward such military strikes will be made smooth by economically strong-holding surrounding countries, forcing them to accept western military action as well as the justifications for it without question.
Military action. This is as acutely on the mind of the current chickenhawks, as the invasion of Iraq was on that of the neocons in the last couple of decades. Apparently, the authors feel compelled to give a justification for the bravura of their manuscript.
‘We chose to consider this extreme and highly unpopular option partly for the sake of analytical rigor and partly because if Iran responded to a confrontational American policy- such as an airstrike, harsh new sanctions, or efforts to foment regime change- with a major escalation of terrorist attacks (or more dire moves against Israel and other American allies), invasion could become a very “live” option.’
As the geopolitical feeding frenzy increases, the authors clearly begin to lose their cool as they begin to talk about the real plan behind all this elaborate brainstorming, reflecting the long-term agenda of the globalists for whom they work:
‘Like Iraq’, the authors state, ‘Iran is too intrinsically and strategically important a country for the United States to be able to march in, overthrow its government, and then march out, leaving chaos in its wake. (…) Iran exports about 2.5 million barrels per day of oil and, with the right technology, it could produce even more. It also has one of the largest reserves of natural gas in the world. These resources make Iran an important supplier of the energy needs of the global economy. Iran does not border Saudi Arabia- the lynchpin of the oil market- or Kuwait, but it does border Iraq, another major oil producer and a country where the United States now has a great deal at stake.’
And exactly in line with their masters tendency of using false flags, they allow themselves the luxury of speculating openly about a possible ‘provocation’ to escalate things to the point of armed conflict.
‘(…) it is not impossible that Tehran might take some action that would justify an American invasion. And it is certainly the case that if Washington sought such a provocation, it could take actions that might make it more likely that Tehran would do so (although being too obvious about this could nullify the provocation). However, since it would be up to Iran to make the provocation move (…), the United States would never know for sure when it would get the requisite Iranian provocation. In fact, it might never come at all.’
Now that would be a great disappointment, wouldn’t it. Under the headline ‘The Question of a Provocation’ on page 66, the authors press the point even further:
‘With provocation, the international diplomatic and domestic political requirements of an invasion would be mitigated, and the more outrageous the Iranian provocation (and the less that the United States is seen to be goading Iran), the more these challenges would be diminished. In the absence of a sufficiently horrific provocation, meeting these requirements would be daunting.’
Reminiscent of the Pearl Harbor-quote by raving neocons pre-9/11, the authors continue imagining how excellent it would be to have an Iranian-sponsored terror attack within the US to trigger war and march off toward Iran. During all this, the authors are aware how unlikely it is that Iran would actually commit such an attack on American soil (probably because they know who is usually responsible for such mass terror attacks):
‘Something on the order of an Iranian-backed 9/11, in which the plane wore Iranian markings and Tehran boasted about its sponsorship.(…). The entire question of “options” become irrelevant at that point: what American president could refrain from an invasion after the Iranians had just killed several thousand American civilians in an attack in the United States itself?‘Regarding the question of international support for an US invasion of the Islamic Republic, the Brookings people lament:
‘Other than a Tehran-sponsored 9/11, it is hard to imagine what would change their minds.’
The same goes for their plans in regards to that old favorite of the elite, covert psychological warfare, in order to subdue a sovereign nation. In chapter 7 of the manuscript, called ‘Inspiring an Insurgency’, it examines the possibility of propagandizing the Iranian people into helping out the globalists lute their nation:
‘The core concept lying at the heart of this option would be for the United States to identify one or more Iranian opposition groups and support them as it did other insurgencies in Afghanistan, Nicaragua, Kurdistan, Angola, and dozens of other locales since the Second World War. The United States would provide arms, money, training, and organizational assistance to help the groups develop and extend their reach. U.S. media and propaganda outlets could highlight group grievances and showcase rival leaders.’
Isn’t that a familiar sight? Could one way to ‘highlight’ group grievances be to mass distribute the death of a poor woman and then claim it’s all thanks to Twitter?
All this hinting at another false-flag attack underway and prepping the international community for a future invasion of Iran is becoming increasingly serious as the warmongering is being stepped up. This is the time to fix our eyes upon these globalists and their think tanks. If their blatant arrogance permits them to openly publish their bloodthirsty musings, we should be vigilant enough to pass this knowledge around lest we have another 9/11 on our hands.
Source: http://www.brookings.edu/~/media/Files/rc/papers/2009/06_iran_strategy/06_iran_strategy.pdf
-
- Social bookmarks
- Email this article
-
- Print this page
- Share on Twitter
June 29th, 2009 at 2:26 pm
1st. Justice !
2nd. Freedom !
3rd. Justice !
4th. There is a better way than the way of the gun …
1835 Reply:
June 29th, 2009 at 6:16 pm
Yea, but when the better ways are exhausted and yield no progress. You have to have a backup plan. The citizens of the US where given the right to own guns for the exact purpose to protect ourselves from tryanny and defend our nation from all enemies. Foreign and domestic.
Unconquered Reply:
July 1st, 2009 at 2:44 pm
I agree Rasta. We need to make a concerted, focused effort to do this non violently at first. But we DO need a plan B. Does anyone know people in Iran? Can we send this to them? Get this word out?
RightofRush Reply:
July 2nd, 2009 at 7:20 pm
Non violent solution => Unconquered, does not compute. Any determined tyrant loves those who believe in “non-violence”.
SayAgain Reply:
July 1st, 2009 at 8:17 pm
I would have thought that Russia, would have had more back bone, and made it clear they would offer defense to Iran, against the war mongering Israelis, and the war mongering Yanks.
It’s time the Russians deployed there black sea fleet, to break any blockade the yanks try to enforce.
The Yanks just like the murdering Israelis do not like equal odds.
Even the Chinks seem to be cowering to the Yankee, and Israeli will.
merrychristmas Reply:
July 1st, 2009 at 11:31 pm
Brookings is a Rockefeller Joint
June 29th, 2009 at 3:28 pm
They’re working their asses off to get the middle east union up and running. Same with the nau, but they don’t show us as blantanly, yet. Most of us here see it as plain as day, but we’re a minority. For now.
"ren Reply:
June 29th, 2009 at 4:41 pm
yup, for now, we just gotta keep getting the word out. i had a gathering of sheeple at the house over the week-end. got lots of cold beer, borrowed a big screen projector, and at dusk, played “endgame” on the side of my house for all the world to see. covered the whole side, IT WAS GREAT! even the widow next door came to watch. we got some neighbors and friends woke up and drunk at the same time, yeah, it got a little roudy. some people get really PISSED when they wake up.
Caitlyn Reply:
July 1st, 2009 at 9:42 am
Yeah. Some of us do.
June 29th, 2009 at 5:54 pm
Thanks for running this article. Here we are, absolutely bankrupt financially and spiritually, and the solution to all of our problems, apparently, is “attack Iran”. Why, what a grand and simple solution that is, let’s get on with this next disaster right away! –something tells us the Iranians aren’t in any big hurry to have America’s trillions of dollars of debt transferred over to & heaped upon them and their great – grandkids (imagine that) and their resources stolen as well. Let’s see here: the 400 million dollars-plus that was earmarked earlier for “destabilization efforts” against the Iranian regime: how effective was all of that, really? – or was that money just another massive robbery of the Treasury, more money flushed down the drain?
June 29th, 2009 at 6:42 pm
Today, there have been some very important articles, and this is a vitally important article for All to attend too.
My perception is that the NWO is NOT occurring FAST enough for the ‘oldies’ that make up most of the Committee of 300, the Bilderberg Group, the Club of Rome, and other organizations. So, they are accelerating their activities and events at such a pace, so as to accomplish the NWO within their lifetimes. Remember: they already have ALL of the Money (now they are bored) and now they want control and power (this will give them something to do), which they will SOON possess. The ONLY way to accomplish their Mission, FAST and within their lifetimes which are already very short, is through aggression, militance, and violence, which are the ONLY ways that are known to them.
In response to the above article: Attack Iran is a BIG wrong!!! However, attacking Iran is a MUST DO, because the ‘Elite’ can NOT permit any nation to act independently and do as a nation wants, and being a ’sovereign-nation-state’ is an Absolute violation of the NWO. Therefore, Iran, or any nation that acts as a ’sovereign-nation-state’, is to be disciplined/punished until they follow under the watchful eyes of the rule of the NWO. (NOTE: Read ‘The Conspirator’s Heirarchy: The Committee of 300′, by Dr. John Coleman a former MI6 British Intelligence Agent, which will educate All on the ‘agenda’ of the NWO.) Therefore, attacking Iran is the plan to accomplish their agenda, more quickly.
Peace to You. Good Day.
June 29th, 2009 at 9:13 pm
All of this concern over Iran’s government and the media going on like it’s the end of the world, but information on what’s acutally going on in North Korea is scarce and hard to come by. Is it just me or is North Korea a wayyy more “threatening” presence but all we care about is the election in Iran. Why doesn’t anyone talk about that abnormality in the news… like captured americans, nuclear bombs, threats of war(to pretty much everyone), not to mention they don’t even try to pretend to be a democracy.. and the world just turns CNN on to see if it was oxycontin or dilaudids that killed Micheal Jackson. Media Blackout anyone?
manchurian candidate Reply:
July 5th, 2009 at 6:33 pm
DON’T BE FOOLED! KEEP YOUR THINKING LOCAL. WATCH EVERYONE AROUND YOU. ASK QUESTIONS. THE IMMEDIATE SURROUNDING IS YOUR MIRROR OF THE THINKING GOING ON IN THE WHOLE WIDE WORLD. THERE IS NO AUTHORITY OUTSIDE OURSELVES. FUCK THE EXTERNAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES. ONLY THE INNER MAN RULES……
June 29th, 2009 at 11:20 pm
Not necessarily good countries, many are tyrannies in their own regard.
Countries Not Under Anglo-American Globalist Control:
Armenia
Belarus
Bhutan
Bolivia
Brazil
China
Cuba
Ecuador
Eritrea
Iran
Lebanon
Libya
Myanmar
Nicaragua
North Korea
Russia
Serbia
Somalia
Sudan
Syria
Venezuela
Vietnam
Yemen
Zimbabwe
June 30th, 2009 at 7:30 pm
#########EUROPE GOING CRAZY#########
***URGENT*** SIGN AGAINGST THE INAUGURATION OF BOMBODROM BERLIN.
It would be the largest training area in Europe and essential in the preparation of military intervention of NATO and the EU.
[FOR GERMANY]
https://www.campact.de/bomb/sn1/signer
Read info:
militarybases.twoday.net/stories/762920
June 30th, 2009 at 7:35 pm
DEAR U.S. SOLDIERS. HERE’S AN IMPORTANT MESSAGE TO YOU ALL:
###########################################
##GET THE FUCK OUT OFF IRAQ!!!!! ITS A WAR BASED ON LIES##
###########################################
DON’T RUN THE ROCKEFELLERS/BILDERBERGERS/CLUB OF ROME’S WORLD GOVERNMENT (INCLUDING POPULATION REDUCTION) AGENDA.
!!!!!!!!!!!ALCIADA AND TALIBAN ARE U.S. FUNDED!!!!!!!!!
knottrue Reply:
June 30th, 2009 at 10:59 pm
Here, Here 1835! I couldn’t have said it better. If more people had our frame of mind when it comes to the Second Amendment, and most will come around sooner or later. And if that day ever comes to pass, that we are “Asked” to turn in our guns, Martial or no Martial Law? They can all Kiss my Ass and let’em come GIT SOME!
DEATH TO ALL TYRANTS!
IF YOU EVER WORE A UNIFORM, YOU REMEMBER THE OATH YOU TOOK!
TO DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION FROM ALL ENEMIES, FOREIGN AND “DOMESTIC”!
FOREIGN AND “DOMESTIC”!
http://www.oathkeepers.org “IT MAY BE THE SECOND MOST IMPORTANT OATH THAT ANY AND ALL AMERICANS WILL EVER TAKE!
June 30th, 2009 at 11:58 pm
This is an astonishing article. It is very, very critical reading. The Brookings Institute is closely allied with Goldman Sachs and other leaders of the NWO. I think that the NWO is in for a big surprise. They have destabilized their power base: the psychopathic middle class that has always enjoyed the genocide as long as they were doing well. I learned about the economic hit men in the late 1970’s. For thirty years I have not seen any kind of awakening among the middle class until now. You take away the hopes of the American middle class and you have revolution. There will be no NWO. Sorry. The Jews lost. They have been outed everywhere. I would not work with or for a Jew if my life depended on it. I have been terrorized by them in academia. If Jews did not own all publishing companies and media, you could read my story.
July 1st, 2009 at 1:33 am
Doesn’t the Brookings Institute run things anyway? They say it will happen and then it does. Duh.
July 2nd, 2009 at 12:21 am
This is not a very new trend, but this trick is getting more and more used: announcing the future plans, which are outrageously inhuman, the war crimes, the plans for genocide, etc., LONG AHEAD of the date they will be implemented, and, announcing them OPENLY – IN ORDER TO CONSIDERABLY REDUCE THE OUTCRY when the plans are implemented. The trick is simple – when the plan becomes a reality, the public, stupid and inert as it is, will say: “O, I already heard about it, this is not surprising”.
It should be expected that the use of this trick will grow as we approach the World War III. Finally, the scoundrels will “discuss” the idea of starting this war, again – openly and for some extended period. Probably, only one justification (or should I say – jewstification?) will remain – “The future will show that this war was absolutely necessary.”
PrivateSi Reply:
July 2nd, 2009 at 5:32 am
Personally I think you are wrong about this being a preemtive desensitisation trick, I think it is propaganda aimed squarely at Iran to intimidate & quite possibly provoke a real violent response from Iran thus giving a real excuse for invasion.
July 2nd, 2009 at 3:24 pm
These wicked planners bring a bitter tast to us all. Pray their wicked planning be sent back upon
them and their support and may their planning on their own heads be a long one.
July 3rd, 2009 at 12:05 am
What is the militia? The term “militia” consists of two parts: the organized militia and the unorganized militia. According to the organic Maine Constitution and backed by the United States Code, the organized militia is the standing military force in the state (the “State Guard”) while the unorganized militia (which is commonly called the militia) consists of all other males between the ages of 17 and 45 (or 65 if they have prior military service). The militia was established for the purpose of defending the state (a sovereign nation) and the United States of America (a union of nations) from all enemies “foreign and domestic” based upon principles of community self defense established hundreds of years before the nation was formed. However, while the organized militia was tasked with the defenses of the states, our forefathers, having just fought their own government, did not place their entire trust in the government or a standing army to protect them but reserved the right and the means to protect themselves – thus the unorganized militia. The militia was and is a defensive body set up so that its members can take care of normal peace by internal lawless elements, or government usurpation of the rights and power of the people guaranteed by the Constitution, there is a group of people that owe their allegiance to no one except God and their fellow Americans who desire to remain free.
The mission and purpose of the militia have not changed. What has changed is the status of the organized militia. The “State Guard” with the duty and obligation of protecting the state is now under federal jurisdiction (the “National Guard”) thereby obligating it only to the federal government making the unorganized militia the only constitutional force available for the defense of the state.
July 3rd, 2009 at 10:21 am
Martin Bormann was Rothschild Agent — Damning Evidence
http://www.henrymakow.com/mart.....child.html
July 3rd, 2009 at 2:20 pm
Thanks for the heads up.
Just thought I would add the latest news coming from the UK mainstream news outlets. Today Iran has arrested a number of British diplomats to be charged with interfering with Iran by encouraging and organizing mass protests.
Step one complete!
And what is it with this Twitter thing. The BBC is not able to advertise or promote commercial products, yet in the past month virtually every program can’t go more than five minutes without mentioning twitter and encouraging all to use it. Who is behind this twitter movement? and more important wht is its purpose and where is it heading.
Keep up the good work guys and i’ll keep up my part, informing everyone I come across about the truth in an attempt to turn the sheep into Shepard’s.
If we all work to together we can totally disrupt the system.
Love and Light to you all.
Danny Cunnington Reply:
July 5th, 2009 at 6:35 am
You might have noticed as soon as Windows Vista came out the BBC started using a Vista “loading” symbol. Also, the tablets and laptops you see on the news desks are just props. If you ask any journalists or media workers you find that Apple Mac rules supreme in all media but on the BBC these cannot be mentioned or seen anywhere in camera shot.
Speak to just about anybody who has tried Vista and they will tell you what rubbish it is.(This is never mentioned by the BBC). This led to many switching to Apple. This is never mentioned either, I bought my mum a new Vista desktop. I wanted XP but it’s not available. It took three days to get it to work properly and then it was so obviously cheap hyped rubbish that I went out (like many others) and brought a MacBook.
All over Europe thousands of young people are switching to Linux because of the inferiority of Windows. The elite hate systems that can be encrypted or cleaned. Windows is a tool to spy on you.
Microsoft is a prime example of monopolistic abuse. The BBC covertly promote Microsoft products because they are not independent but a propaganda tool that support the ruling elite.
The promotion of Twitter is also political. They have very carefully censored the global warming scam and even ostracized one of it’s leading and very well known environmentalists for not going along with the obvious falsehood. (David Bellamy who has produced many environmental documentaries over twenty years has been cut from all BBC schedules and mentioning his name on air is now forbidden).
You now have this surreal situation in the UK where millions abandon all the basic principles of biology and join some weird green cult. A whole new class of climate criminals are being created. Climate deniers who insist on scientific fact as now an enemy of the state.