
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brookings Publication mentions possibility of ‘Horrific Provocation’ to Trigger Iran Invasion</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.infowars.com/brookings-publication-mentions-possibility-of-%e2%80%98horrific-provocation%e2%80%99-to-trigger-iran-invasion/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.infowars.com/brookings-publication-mentions-possibility-of-%e2%80%98horrific-provocation%e2%80%99-to-trigger-iran-invasion/</link>
	<description>Because there's a war on for your mind.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:20:32 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: manchurian candidate</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/brookings-publication-mentions-possibility-of-%e2%80%98horrific-provocation%e2%80%99-to-trigger-iran-invasion/comment-page-1/#comment-1146819</link>
		<dc:creator>manchurian candidate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 23:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=13052#comment-1146819</guid>
		<description>DON&#039;T BE FOOLED! KEEP YOUR THINKING LOCAL. WATCH EVERYONE AROUND YOU. ASK QUESTIONS. THE IMMEDIATE SURROUNDING IS YOUR  MIRROR OF THE THINKING GOING ON IN THE WHOLE WIDE WORLD. THERE IS NO AUTHORITY OUTSIDE OURSELVES. FUCK THE EXTERNAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES. ONLY THE INNER MAN RULES......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DON&#8217;T BE FOOLED! KEEP YOUR THINKING LOCAL. WATCH EVERYONE AROUND YOU. ASK QUESTIONS. THE IMMEDIATE SURROUNDING IS YOUR  MIRROR OF THE THINKING GOING ON IN THE WHOLE WIDE WORLD. THERE IS NO AUTHORITY OUTSIDE OURSELVES. FUCK THE EXTERNAL GOVERNMENT AUTHORITIES. ONLY THE INNER MAN RULES&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Cunnington</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/brookings-publication-mentions-possibility-of-%e2%80%98horrific-provocation%e2%80%99-to-trigger-iran-invasion/comment-page-1/#comment-1145835</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Cunnington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 11:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=13052#comment-1145835</guid>
		<description>You might have noticed as soon as Windows Vista came out the BBC started using a Vista &quot;loading&quot; symbol. Also, the tablets and laptops you see on the news desks are just props. If you ask any journalists or media workers you find that Apple Mac rules supreme in all media but on the BBC these cannot  be mentioned or seen anywhere in camera shot.

Speak to just about anybody who has tried Vista and they will tell you what rubbish it is.(This is never mentioned by the BBC). This led to many switching to Apple. This is never mentioned either, I bought my mum a new Vista desktop. I wanted XP but it&#039;s not available. It took three days to get it to work properly and then it was so obviously cheap hyped rubbish that I went out (like many others) and brought a MacBook.

All over Europe thousands of young people are switching to Linux because of the inferiority of Windows. The elite hate systems that can be encrypted or cleaned. Windows is a tool to spy on you.
Microsoft is a prime example of monopolistic abuse. The BBC covertly promote Microsoft products because they are not independent but a propaganda tool that support the ruling elite.

The promotion of Twitter is also political. They have very carefully censored the global warming scam and even ostracized one of it&#039;s leading and very well known environmentalists for not going along with the obvious falsehood. (David Bellamy who has produced many environmental documentaries over twenty years has been cut from all BBC schedules and mentioning his name on air is now forbidden).

You now have this surreal situation in the UK where millions abandon all the basic principles of biology and join some weird green cult. A whole new class of climate criminals are being created. Climate deniers who insist on scientific fact as now an enemy of  the state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might have noticed as soon as Windows Vista came out the BBC started using a Vista &#8220;loading&#8221; symbol. Also, the tablets and laptops you see on the news desks are just props. If you ask any journalists or media workers you find that Apple Mac rules supreme in all media but on the BBC these cannot  be mentioned or seen anywhere in camera shot.</p>
<p>Speak to just about anybody who has tried Vista and they will tell you what rubbish it is.(This is never mentioned by the BBC). This led to many switching to Apple. This is never mentioned either, I bought my mum a new Vista desktop. I wanted XP but it&#8217;s not available. It took three days to get it to work properly and then it was so obviously cheap hyped rubbish that I went out (like many others) and brought a MacBook.</p>
<p>All over Europe thousands of young people are switching to Linux because of the inferiority of Windows. The elite hate systems that can be encrypted or cleaned. Windows is a tool to spy on you.<br />
Microsoft is a prime example of monopolistic abuse. The BBC covertly promote Microsoft products because they are not independent but a propaganda tool that support the ruling elite.</p>
<p>The promotion of Twitter is also political. They have very carefully censored the global warming scam and even ostracized one of it&#8217;s leading and very well known environmentalists for not going along with the obvious falsehood. (David Bellamy who has produced many environmental documentaries over twenty years has been cut from all BBC schedules and mentioning his name on air is now forbidden).</p>
<p>You now have this surreal situation in the UK where millions abandon all the basic principles of biology and join some weird green cult. A whole new class of climate criminals are being created. Climate deniers who insist on scientific fact as now an enemy of  the state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay BadBoy</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/brookings-publication-mentions-possibility-of-%e2%80%98horrific-provocation%e2%80%99-to-trigger-iran-invasion/comment-page-1/#comment-1142230</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay BadBoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 19:20:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=13052#comment-1142230</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the heads up.

Just thought I would add the latest news coming from the UK mainstream news outlets. Today Iran has arrested a number of British diplomats to be charged with interfering with Iran by encouraging and organizing mass protests. 

Step one complete!

And what is it with this Twitter thing. The BBC is not able to advertise or promote commercial products, yet in the past month virtually every program can&#039;t go more than five minutes without mentioning twitter and encouraging all to use it. Who is behind this twitter movement? and more important wht is its purpose and where is it heading.

Keep up the good work guys and i&#039;ll keep up my part, informing everyone I come across about the truth in an attempt to turn the sheep into Shepard&#039;s.

If we all work to together we can totally disrupt the system.

Love and Light to you all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the heads up.</p>
<p>Just thought I would add the latest news coming from the UK mainstream news outlets. Today Iran has arrested a number of British diplomats to be charged with interfering with Iran by encouraging and organizing mass protests. </p>
<p>Step one complete!</p>
<p>And what is it with this Twitter thing. The BBC is not able to advertise or promote commercial products, yet in the past month virtually every program can&#8217;t go more than five minutes without mentioning twitter and encouraging all to use it. Who is behind this twitter movement? and more important wht is its purpose and where is it heading.</p>
<p>Keep up the good work guys and i&#8217;ll keep up my part, informing everyone I come across about the truth in an attempt to turn the sheep into Shepard&#8217;s.</p>
<p>If we all work to together we can totally disrupt the system.</p>
<p>Love and Light to you all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ac</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/brookings-publication-mentions-possibility-of-%e2%80%98horrific-provocation%e2%80%99-to-trigger-iran-invasion/comment-page-1/#comment-1141672</link>
		<dc:creator>ac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 15:21:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=13052#comment-1141672</guid>
		<description>Martin Bormann was Rothschild Agent -- Damning Evidence
http://www.henrymakow.com/martin_bormann_was_rothschild.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martin Bormann was Rothschild Agent &#8212; Damning Evidence<br />
<a href="http://www.henrymakow.com/martin_bormann_was_rothschild.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.henrymakow.com/mart.....child.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sydwayz</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/brookings-publication-mentions-possibility-of-%e2%80%98horrific-provocation%e2%80%99-to-trigger-iran-invasion/comment-page-1/#comment-1140693</link>
		<dc:creator>sydwayz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 05:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=13052#comment-1140693</guid>
		<description>What is the militia? The term &quot;militia&quot; consists of two parts: the organized militia and the unorganized militia. According to the organic Maine Constitution and backed by the United States Code, the organized militia is the standing military force in the state (the &quot;State Guard&quot;) while the unorganized militia (which is commonly called the militia) consists of all other males between the ages of 17 and 45 (or 65 if they have prior military service). The militia was established for the purpose of defending the state (a sovereign nation) and the United States of America (a union of nations) from all enemies &quot;foreign and domestic&quot; based upon principles of community self defense established hundreds of years before the nation was formed. However, while the organized militia was tasked with the defenses of the states, our forefathers, having just fought their own government, did not place their entire trust in the government or a standing army to protect them but reserved the right and the means to protect themselves - thus the unorganized militia. The militia was and is a defensive body set up so that its members can take care of normal peace by internal lawless elements, or government usurpation of the rights and power of the people guaranteed by the Constitution, there is a group of people that owe their allegiance to no one except God and their fellow Americans who desire to remain free. 

The mission and purpose of the militia have not changed. What has changed is the status of the organized militia. The &quot;State Guard&quot; with the duty and obligation of protecting the state is now under federal jurisdiction (the &quot;National Guard&quot;) thereby obligating it only to the federal government making the unorganized militia the only constitutional force available for the defense of the state.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is the militia? The term &#8220;militia&#8221; consists of two parts: the organized militia and the unorganized militia. According to the organic Maine Constitution and backed by the United States Code, the organized militia is the standing military force in the state (the &#8220;State Guard&#8221;) while the unorganized militia (which is commonly called the militia) consists of all other males between the ages of 17 and 45 (or 65 if they have prior military service). The militia was established for the purpose of defending the state (a sovereign nation) and the United States of America (a union of nations) from all enemies &#8220;foreign and domestic&#8221; based upon principles of community self defense established hundreds of years before the nation was formed. However, while the organized militia was tasked with the defenses of the states, our forefathers, having just fought their own government, did not place their entire trust in the government or a standing army to protect them but reserved the right and the means to protect themselves &#8211; thus the unorganized militia. The militia was and is a defensive body set up so that its members can take care of normal peace by internal lawless elements, or government usurpation of the rights and power of the people guaranteed by the Constitution, there is a group of people that owe their allegiance to no one except God and their fellow Americans who desire to remain free. </p>
<p>The mission and purpose of the militia have not changed. What has changed is the status of the organized militia. The &#8220;State Guard&#8221; with the duty and obligation of protecting the state is now under federal jurisdiction (the &#8220;National Guard&#8221;) thereby obligating it only to the federal government making the unorganized militia the only constitutional force available for the defense of the state.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RightofRush</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/brookings-publication-mentions-possibility-of-%e2%80%98horrific-provocation%e2%80%99-to-trigger-iran-invasion/comment-page-1/#comment-1139868</link>
		<dc:creator>RightofRush</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 00:20:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=13052#comment-1139868</guid>
		<description>Non violent solution =&gt; Unconquered, does not compute.  Any determined tyrant loves those who believe in &quot;non-violence&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Non violent solution =&gt; Unconquered, does not compute.  Any determined tyrant loves those who believe in &#8220;non-violence&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: frederick m. pearson</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/brookings-publication-mentions-possibility-of-%e2%80%98horrific-provocation%e2%80%99-to-trigger-iran-invasion/comment-page-1/#comment-1139156</link>
		<dc:creator>frederick m. pearson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 20:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=13052#comment-1139156</guid>
		<description>These wicked planners bring a bitter tast to us all. Pray their wicked planning be sent back upon
them and their support and may their planning on their own heads be a long one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These wicked planners bring a bitter tast to us all. Pray their wicked planning be sent back upon<br />
them and their support and may their planning on their own heads be a long one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PrivateSi</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/brookings-publication-mentions-possibility-of-%e2%80%98horrific-provocation%e2%80%99-to-trigger-iran-invasion/comment-page-1/#comment-1137351</link>
		<dc:creator>PrivateSi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 10:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=13052#comment-1137351</guid>
		<description>Personally I think you are wrong about this being a preemtive desensitisation trick, I think it is propaganda aimed squarely at Iran to intimidate &amp; quite possibly provoke a real violent response from Iran thus giving a real excuse for invasion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I think you are wrong about this being a preemtive desensitisation trick, I think it is propaganda aimed squarely at Iran to intimidate &amp; quite possibly provoke a real violent response from Iran thus giving a real excuse for invasion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Pyshnov</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/brookings-publication-mentions-possibility-of-%e2%80%98horrific-provocation%e2%80%99-to-trigger-iran-invasion/comment-page-1/#comment-1136968</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Pyshnov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 05:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=13052#comment-1136968</guid>
		<description>This is not a very new trend, but this trick is getting more and more used: announcing the future plans, which are outrageously inhuman, the war crimes, the plans for genocide, etc., LONG AHEAD of the date they will be implemented, and, announcing them OPENLY - IN ORDER TO CONSIDERABLY REDUCE THE OUTCRY when the plans are implemented. The trick is simple - when the plan becomes a reality, the public, stupid and inert as it is, will say: &quot;O, I already heard about it, this is not surprising&quot;.
It should be expected that the use of this trick will grow as we approach the World War III. Finally, the scoundrels will &quot;discuss&quot; the idea of starting this war, again - openly and for some extended period. Probably, only one justification (or should I say - jewstification?) will remain - &quot;The future will show that this war was absolutely necessary.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not a very new trend, but this trick is getting more and more used: announcing the future plans, which are outrageously inhuman, the war crimes, the plans for genocide, etc., LONG AHEAD of the date they will be implemented, and, announcing them OPENLY &#8211; IN ORDER TO CONSIDERABLY REDUCE THE OUTCRY when the plans are implemented. The trick is simple &#8211; when the plan becomes a reality, the public, stupid and inert as it is, will say: &#8220;O, I already heard about it, this is not surprising&#8221;.<br />
It should be expected that the use of this trick will grow as we approach the World War III. Finally, the scoundrels will &#8220;discuss&#8221; the idea of starting this war, again &#8211; openly and for some extended period. Probably, only one justification (or should I say &#8211; jewstification?) will remain &#8211; &#8220;The future will show that this war was absolutely necessary.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: merrychristmas</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/brookings-publication-mentions-possibility-of-%e2%80%98horrific-provocation%e2%80%99-to-trigger-iran-invasion/comment-page-1/#comment-1136859</link>
		<dc:creator>merrychristmas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 04:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=13052#comment-1136859</guid>
		<description>Brookings is a Rockefeller Joint</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Brookings is a Rockefeller Joint</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
