
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Infowars &#187; Washington Politics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.infowars.com/category/election-politics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.infowars.com</link>
	<description>Because there's a war on for your mind.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:21:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Support for Health Care Plan Falls to New Low</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/support-for-health-care-plan-falls-to-new-low/</link>
		<comments>http://www.infowars.com/support-for-health-care-plan-falls-to-new-low/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:41:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Washington Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=20718</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Rasmussen Reports</strong> &#124; Just 38% of voters now favor the health care plan proposed by President Obama and congressional Democrats.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Rasmussen Reports</strong><br />
November 23, 2009</p>
<p><ul class="ppani"><li>A d v e r t i s e m e n t</li><li><a href="http://www.efoodsdirect.com/holidaySpecial.html?aid=13&adid=14" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.infowars.com/images/banners/Holiday-Special-335_205.gif" alt="efoods" width="335" height="205" border="0" title="Support for Health Care Plan Falls to New Low Photo" /></a></li></ul>Just 38% of voters now favor the health care plan proposed by President Obama and congressional Democrats. That’s the lowest level of support measured for the plan in nearly two dozen tracking polls conducted since June.</p>
<p>The latest Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey finds that 56% now oppose the plan.</p>
<p>Half the survey was conducted before the Senate voted late Saturday to begin debate on its version of the legislation. Support for the plan was slightly lower in the half of the survey conducted after the Senate vote. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/healthcare/september_2009/health_care_reform">Read entire article</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.infowars.com/support-for-health-care-plan-falls-to-new-low/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>70</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obamacare Moves Forward</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/obamacare-moves-forward/</link>
		<comments>http://www.infowars.com/obamacare-moves-forward/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 16:22:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Washington Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=20604</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Reuters</strong> &#124; A sweeping healthcare overhaul narrowly cleared its first hurdle in the Senate on Saturday]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Reuters</strong><br />
November 22, 2009</p>
<p><ul class="ppani"><li>A d v e r t i s e m e n t</li><li><a href="http://www.efoodsdirect.com/holidaySpecial.html?aid=13&adid=14" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.infowars.com/images/banners/Holiday-Special-335_205.gif" alt="efoods" width="335" height="205" border="0" title="Obamacare Moves Forward Photo" /></a></li></ul>A sweeping healthcare overhaul narrowly cleared its first hurdle in the Senate on Saturday, with Democrats casting 60 party-line votes to open debate on the biggest healthcare changes in decades.</p>
<p>In the first Senate test for President Barack Obama&#8217;s top domestic priority, Democrats unanimously backed a procedural motion to open debate over the opposition of 39 Republicans. Republican George Voinovich did not vote.</p>
<p>Democrats needed 60 votes to approve the motion in the 100-member Senate and had no margin for error &#8212; they control exactly 60 votes.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSN1812587720091122">Read entire article</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.infowars.com/obamacare-moves-forward/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>87</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Health care rhetoric heats up before key vote</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/health-care-rhetoric-heats-up-before-key-vote/</link>
		<comments>http://www.infowars.com/health-care-rhetoric-heats-up-before-key-vote/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 19:06:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Washington Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=20556</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>CNN</strong> &#124; Republicans ripped Democrats for pushing a bill that conservatives say will force millions of Americans to drop insurance plans they like while jacking up premiums and doing nothing to slow spiraling medical costs.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>CNN</strong><br />
November 20, 2009</p>
<p><ul class="ppani"><li>A d v e r t i s e m e n t</li><li><a href="http://www.efoodsdirect.com/holidaySpecial.html?aid=13&adid=14" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.infowars.com/images/banners/Holiday-Special-335_205.gif" alt="efoods" width="335" height="205" border="0" title="Health care rhetoric heats up before key vote Photo" /></a></li></ul>Traditional Senate decorum yielded to brass-knuckle politicking Friday in the health care debate as top Democrats sought to close party ranks before a key procedural vote this weekend.</p>
<p>Senate Democrats slammed their GOP colleagues as leaders of a counterproductive party of fear caught in an obstructionist mind-set dating back to the New Deal.</p>
<p>In turn, Republicans ripped Democrats for pushing a bill that conservatives say will force millions of Americans to drop insurance plans they like while jacking up premiums and doing nothing to slow spiraling medical costs.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/11/20/health.care/index.html?eref=rss_us&#038;utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+rss%2Fcnn_us+(RSS%3A+U.S.)">Read entire article</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.infowars.com/health-care-rhetoric-heats-up-before-key-vote/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>45</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>By 2019, Taxpayers Will Pay $196 Billion A Year for Obamacare, But 24 Million People Will Remain Uninsured</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/by-2019-taxpayers-will-pay-196-billion-a-year-for-obamacare-but-24-million-people-will-remain-uninsured/</link>
		<comments>http://www.infowars.com/by-2019-taxpayers-will-pay-196-billion-a-year-for-obamacare-but-24-million-people-will-remain-uninsured/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Washington Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=20548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Terence P. Jeffrey</strong> &#124; Reid’s proposal mandates that all individuals legally resident in the United States purchase health insurance.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Terence P. Jeffrey</strong><br />
CNSNews<br />
November 20, 2009</p>
<p><ul class="ppani"><li>A d v e r t i s e m e n t</li><li><a href="http://www.efoodsdirect.com/holidaySpecial.html?aid=13&adid=14" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.infowars.com/images/banners/Holiday-Special-335_205.gif" alt="efoods" width="335" height="205" border="0" title="By 2019, Taxpayers Will Pay $196 Billion A Year for Obamacare, But 24 Million People Will Remain Uninsured  Photo" /></a></li></ul>Under the health care bill introduced by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) on Wednesday, by 2019 taxpayers will be paying $196 billion per year to subsidize other people’s health insurance coverage, but there still will be 24 million uninsured people in America, according to the Congressional Budget Office and the Joint Committee on Taxation.</p>
<p>Reid’s proposal mandates that all individuals legally resident in the United States purchase health insurance and offers subsidies to people making up to 400 percent of the poverty level ($88,200 for a family of four) to purchase insurance as long as they buy a federally regulated and approved plan sold in a federally regulated insurance exchange.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/57454">Read entire article</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.infowars.com/by-2019-taxpayers-will-pay-196-billion-a-year-for-obamacare-but-24-million-people-will-remain-uninsured/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>51</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ron Paul&#8217;s Amendment To Audit The Federal Reserve Approved</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/ron-pauls-amendment-to-audit-the-federal-reserve-approved/</link>
		<comments>http://www.infowars.com/ron-pauls-amendment-to-audit-the-federal-reserve-approved/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 23:21:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Washington Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=20509</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>StreetInsider</strong> &#124; A key House panel approved the Paul-Grayson Amendment by an overwhelming 43-26 Thursday afternoon, which will give watchdogs new authority to audit the Federal Reserve.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.streetinsider.com/General+News/Ron+Pauls+Amendment+To+Audit+The+Federal+Reserve+Approved/5128440.html">StreetInsider</a></strong><br />
November 19, 2009 </p>
<p>A key House panel approved the Paul-Grayson Amendment by an overwhelming 43-26 Thursday afternoon, which will give watchdogs new authority to audit the Federal Reserve.</p>
<p>Here is a summary of the Paul-Grayson Amendment:</p>
<p>Dear Financial Services Committee Colleague:</p>
<p>It is encouraging to see the issue of Federal Reserve transparency receiving so much attention during this current markup. Today we plan to offer an amendment to the Financial Stability Improvement Act that expands on the many extant proposals to enhance Federal Reserve transparency. Our amendment is based on HR 1207, the Federal Reserve Transparency Act, which has broad bipartisan and grassroots support. The bill is cosponsored by 309 Members of Congress, including all Financial Services Committee Republicans and 13 Financial Services Committee Democrats.</p>
<p><ul class="ppani"><li>A d v e r t i s e m e n t</li><li><a href="http://www.efoodsdirect.com/holidaySpecial.html?aid=13&adid=14" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.infowars.com/images/banners/Holiday-Special-335_205.gif" alt="efoods" width="335" height="205" border="0" title="Ron Pauls Amendment To Audit The Federal Reserve Approved Photo" /></a></li></ul>The amendment removes restrictions on GAO audits of the Federal Reserve, as HR 1207 does, but makes a few changes to take into account some of the concerns that the Fed has made known in public testimony. Specifically, the Paul/Grayson amendment:</p>
<p>* Exempts unreleased transcripts and minutes from meetings of the Board and FOMC to address the Fed’s concerns that free and open debate in their meetings would be stifled.<br />
* Sets a 180-day time lag for release of details of market actions the Fed has undertaken, to address the Fed’s concerns that Congress or GAO is second-guessing its actions.<br />
* Removes boilerplate language that allowed GAO to make recommendations on monetary policy and adds a section stating that nothing in the amendment shall be construed as interference in or dictation of monetary policy to the Fed.</p>
<p>Unlike proposals that target the Fed’s 13(3) facilities, the Paul/Grayson amendment opens up the entire $2 trillion Federal Reserve balance sheet to a GAO audit. The Fed’s recent purchases of nearly $800 billion in mortgage-backed securities (MBS) have occurred under the MBS Purchase Program, authorized under section 14(b) of the Federal Reserve Act. This program, which is expected to reach a size of $1.25 trillion, would remain exempt from audit even if all the current 13(3) audit proposals were to go into effect. Targeting facilities that are in the process of being drawn down and that are authorized under a specific subsection of the Federal Reserve while allowing other facilities to spring up in their place is counterproductive to true transparency. All purchases and loans that appear on the balance sheet should be subject to audit, without loopholes for the Fed to evade scrutiny.</p>
<p>More importantly, the Paul/Grayson amendment does not create any additional burdens. Some competing proposals, while making a good effort at expanding the number of 13(3) facilities open to audit, take a step backwards by imposing new restrictions on GAO that are more burdensome than the restrictions currently written into law. We cannot accept these new restrictions. Unlike competing proposals, this amendment amends existing restrictions on GAO audit authority, a necessary precondition for a complete audit. Competing proposals leave these restrictions in place, and even add new ones.</p>
<p>We also reject the false dichotomy between transparency and independence. The Paul/Grayson amendment would achieve the necessary transparency of the trillions of dollars of Fed interventions while keeping Congress from directly intervening in the decision-making process. Independence should not be synonymous with secrecy. We urge our colleagues to support the Paul/Grayson amendment.</p>
<p>Sincerely,</p>
<p>Ron Paul, Member of Congress<br />
Alan Grayson, Member of Congress</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.infowars.com/ron-pauls-amendment-to-audit-the-federal-reserve-approved/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>304</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Reid Introduces Senate Health Bill That Mandates Federally Subsidized Abortion</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/reid-introduces-senate-health-bill-that-mandates-federally-subsidized-abortion/</link>
		<comments>http://www.infowars.com/reid-introduces-senate-health-bill-that-mandates-federally-subsidized-abortion/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 18:53:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Washington Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=20488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>CNSNews</strong> &#124; Senate Majority Harry Reid (D.-Nev.) late Wednesday published the final text of a Senate health care bill that would mandate federally subsidized abortion.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Terence P. Jeffrey</strong><br />
CNSNews<br />
November 19, 2009</p>
<p><ul class="ppani"><li>A d v e r t i s e m e n t</li><li><a href="http://www.efoodsdirect.com/holidaySpecial.html?aid=13&adid=14" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.infowars.com/images/banners/Holiday-Special-335_205.gif" alt="efoods" width="335" height="205" border="0" title="Reid Introduces Senate Health Bill That Mandates Federally Subsidized Abortion Photo" /></a></li></ul>Senate Majority Harry Reid (D.-Nev.) late Wednesday published the final text of a Senate health care bill that would mandate federally subsidized abortion.</p>
<p>The mandate appears on page 120 of the 2,074-page bill under the seemingly innocuous heading: ‘Assured Availability of Varied Coverage Through Exchanges.”</p>
<p>Specifically, the provision requires that the secretary of Health and Human Services make certain that at least one health insurance plan offered in government-regulated insurance exchanges where people will be able to purchase health insurance using government subsidies must provide coverage of abortion. The secretary also must make certain that at least one plan available in the exchanges not cover abortions.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/57392">Read entire article</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.infowars.com/reid-introduces-senate-health-bill-that-mandates-federally-subsidized-abortion/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>29</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Congressman Tells Americans to Stop Complaining So Much</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/congressman-tells-americans-to-stop-complaining-so-much/</link>
		<comments>http://www.infowars.com/congressman-tells-americans-to-stop-complaining-so-much/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 17:46:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Washington Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=20475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Capitol Confidential</strong> &#124; Rep. Cleaver is currently circulating a “Dear Colleague” letter, seeking co-sponsors for House Concurrent Resolution 155, designating the day before Thanksgiving as the official “Complaint Free Wednesday.”]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Capitol Confidential </strong><br />
Big Government<br />
November 19, 2009</p>
<p><ul class="ppani"><li>A d v e r t i s e m e n t</li><li><a href="http://www.efoodsdirect.com/holidaySpecial.html?aid=13&adid=14" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.infowars.com/images/banners/Holiday-Special-335_205.gif" alt="efoods" width="335" height="205" border="0" title="Congressman Tells Americans to Stop Complaining So Much Photo" /></a></li></ul>Sure, the economy sucks. Unemployment is at least 10.2% and, yes, if you include part-time workers who would rather have full-time jobs it may be over 17%. The government is showering our cash on Wall Street and burning through piles of our children and grandchildren’s money “saving” phantom jobs in Congressional Districts that don’t exist.</p>
<p>Oh yeah, and Congress is planning for a government take-over of our health care system, legislating higher energy prices and raising taxes. Sheesh, no wonder we’re feeling blue.</p>
<p>Well, not to worry, three-term Congressman Emanuel Cleaver (D-MO) has found a solution: Stop Complaining So Much. Rep. Cleaver is currently circulating a “Dear Colleague” letter, seeking co-sponsors for House Concurrent Resolution 155, designating the day before Thanksgiving as the official “Complaint Free Wednesday.”</p>
<p><a href="http://biggovernment.com/2009/11/18/finally-a-congressman-with-a-solution-stop-complaining-so-much/">Read entire article</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.infowars.com/congressman-tells-americans-to-stop-complaining-so-much/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>100</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Majority of Americans Like Obama Personally But Not His Policies</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/majority-of-americans-like-obama-personally-but-not-his-policies/</link>
		<comments>http://www.infowars.com/majority-of-americans-like-obama-personally-but-not-his-policies/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2009 16:50:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Washington Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=20465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Fox News</strong> &#124; A newly released Quinnipiac University poll finds that 48 percent approve of Obama's job performance while 42 percent disapprove.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Fox News</strong><br />
November 19, 2009</p>
<p><ul class="ppani"><li>A d v e r t i s e m e n t</li><li><a href="http://www.efoodsdirect.com/holidaySpecial.html?aid=13&adid=14" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.infowars.com/images/banners/Holiday-Special-335_205.gif" alt="efoods" width="335" height="205" border="0" title="Majority of Americans Like Obama Personally But Not His Policies Photo" /></a></li></ul>An overwhelming number of American voters say they like President Obama as a person but disapprove of most of his policies, according to a Quinnipiac University poll released Thursday.</p>
<p>The poll, which surveyed 2,518 registered voters nationwide from Nov. 9 to 16, found that Obama&#8217;s approach to health care reform is among the president&#8217;s most unpopular domestic priorities &#8212; with 53 percent saying they disapprove of his policy on health reform while 41 percent said they approve.</p>
<p>&#8220;Most Americans like President Barack Obama and might like to have a beer with him,&#8221; Peter Brown, assistant director of the Quinnipiac University Polling Institute, said in a press release Thursday. &#8220;But millions of voters who sided with him last November because they thought he would bring change to Washington aren&#8217;t crazy about the kind of change he is trying to bring.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2009/11/19/obamas-approval-rating-dips-percent-time-poll-finds/?utm_source=feedburner&#038;utm_medium=feed&#038;utm_campaign=Feed%253A+foxnews%252Fpolitics+%2528FOXNews.com+-+Politics%2529">Read entire article</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.infowars.com/majority-of-americans-like-obama-personally-but-not-his-policies/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>80</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How the Feds Criminalize Legal Activities</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/how-the-feds-criminalize-legal-activities/</link>
		<comments>http://www.infowars.com/how-the-feds-criminalize-legal-activities/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:48:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Washington Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=20393</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Guardian</strong> &#124; Aggressive prosecutorial conduct -- or, rather, misconduct -- is nothing new.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dan Kennedy</strong><br />
The Guardian<br />
November 18, 2009</p>
<p><ul class="ppani"><li>A d v e r t i s e m e n t</li><li><a href="http://www.efoodsdirect.com/holidaySpecial.html?aid=13&adid=14" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.infowars.com/images/banners/Holiday-Special-335_205.gif" alt="efoods" width="335" height="205" border="0" title="How the Feds Criminalize Legal Activities Photo" /></a></li></ul>Sharp-elbowed business executives and grasping politicians may not be especially popular figures within the American iconography. But membership in either of those classes is not a federal crime.</p>
<p>Except when it is.</p>
<p>In an important new book, Three Felonies a Day: How the Feds Target the Innocent, Boston civil-rights lawyer Harvey Silverglate argues that over the past several decades the federal government, relying on vague, dangerously elastic statutes, has criminalised a whole range of activities. The result, Silverglate contends, is that people are regularly sent to prison for crimes they hadn&#8217;t even known they&#8217;d committed.</p>
<p>&#8220;Wrongful prosecution of innocent conduct that is twisted into a felony charge has wrecked many an innocent life and career. Whole families have been devastated, as have myriad relationships and entire companies,&#8221; writes Silverglate, a friend as well as an occasional collaborator.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/cifamerica/2009/nov/17/silverglate-three-felonies-book">Read entire article</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.infowars.com/how-the-feds-criminalize-legal-activities/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>46</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama popularity below 50 percent for first time</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/obama-popularity-below-50-percent-for-first-time/</link>
		<comments>http://www.infowars.com/obama-popularity-below-50-percent-for-first-time/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Washington Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=20385</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>AFP</strong> &#124; Obama's job approval rating has dipped below 50 percent nationally for the first time, as Americans worry about the war in Afghanistan.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>AFP</strong><br />
November 18, 2009</p>
<p><ul class="ppani"><li>A d v e r t i s e m e n t</li><li><a href="http://www.efoodsdirect.com/holidaySpecial.html?aid=13&adid=14" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.infowars.com/images/banners/Holiday-Special-335_205.gif" alt="efoods" width="335" height="205" border="0" title="Obama popularity below 50 percent for first time  Photo" /></a></li></ul>President Barack Obama&#8217;s job approval rating has dipped below 50 percent nationally for the first time, as Americans worry about the war in Afghanistan, a new poll released Wednesday found.</p>
<p>The Quinnipiac University poll showed 48 percent of Americans approve of the way Obama is handling his job as president, compared to 42 percent who disapprove.</p>
<p>The president also scored low marks from Americans on his handling of the situation in Afghanistan, with just 38 percent saying they approved of his approach, but a majority did say it was the &#8220;right thing&#8221; for US troops to be in the country.</p>
<p><a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20091118/ts_alt_afp/uspoliticsobama">Read entire article</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.infowars.com/obama-popularity-below-50-percent-for-first-time/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>102</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
