
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Infowars &#187; World at War</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.infowars.com/category/world-at-war/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.infowars.com</link>
	<description>Because there's a war on for your mind.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 01:21:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
		<item>
		<title>Cuba Prepares Against U.S. Attack</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/cuba-prepares-against-u-s-attack/</link>
		<comments>http://www.infowars.com/cuba-prepares-against-u-s-attack/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Nov 2009 19:02:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World at War]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=20673</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>AFP</strong> &#124; Nearly 50 years after a botched US-directed invasion of Cuba, the communist nation said it is holding a military exercise next week to boost preparedness against any future US attack.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>AFP</strong><br />
November 23, 2009</p>
<p><ul class="ppani"><li>A d v e r t i s e m e n t</li><li><a href="http://www.efoodsdirect.com/holidaySpecial.html?aid=13&adid=14" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.infowars.com/images/banners/Holiday-Special-335_205.gif" alt="efoods" width="335" height="205" border="0" title="Cuba Prepares Against U.S. Attack Photo" /></a></li></ul>Nearly 50 years after a botched US-directed invasion of Cuba, the communist nation said Saturday it is holding a military exercise next week to boost preparedness against any future US attack.</p>
<p>&#8220;It is a necessity of the first order given the political-military situation that now defines relations between Cuba and the empire,&#8221; Major General Leonardo Andollo warned, referring to the United States. </p>
<p> He told the official Granma newspaper that the &#8220;Bastion-2009&#8243; exercises will &#8220;raise the deterrent capacity to prevent a military confrontation, under the principle that there is no better way to win a war than by avoiding it.&#8221;</p>
<p>The military exercise, Cuba&#8217;s largest in five years and the first since Barack Obama&#8217;s inauguration as US president in January, will be held Thursday through Saturday, followed by Sunday&#8217;s armed forces day to be marked nationwide. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=CNG.817b096e8b0f2936fc2c9458d4d3486b.821&#038;show_article=1">Read entire article</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.infowars.com/cuba-prepares-against-u-s-attack/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>109</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Upper-Bracket Tax May Be Needed for Afghan War Cost, Levin Says</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/upper-bracket-tax-may-be-needed-for-afghan-war-cost-levin-says/</link>
		<comments>http://www.infowars.com/upper-bracket-tax-may-be-needed-for-afghan-war-cost-levin-says/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 16:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World at War]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=20601</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Bloomberg</strong> &#124; Higher-income Americans should be taxed to pay for more troops sent to Afghanistan and NATO should provide half of the new soldiers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Viola Gienger</strong><br />
Bloomberg<br />
November 21, 2009</p>
<p><ul class="ppani"><li>A d v e r t i s e m e n t</li><li><a href="http://www.efoodsdirect.com/holidaySpecial.html?aid=13&adid=14" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.infowars.com/images/banners/Holiday-Special-335_205.gif" alt="efoods" width="335" height="205" border="0" title="Upper Bracket Tax May Be Needed for Afghan War Cost, Levin Says  Photo" /></a></li></ul>Higher-income Americans should be taxed to pay for more troops sent to Afghanistan and NATO should provide half of the new soldiers, said Carl Levin, chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee.</p>
<p>An “additional income tax to the upper brackets, folks earning more than $200,000 or $250,000” a year, could fund more troops, Levin, a Michigan Democrat, said in an interview for Bloomberg Television’s “Political Capital With Al Hunt,” airing this weekend.</p>
<p>White House Budget Director Peter Orszag has estimated that each additional soldier in Afghanistan could cost $1 million, for a total that could reach $40 billion if 40,000 more troops are added. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601070&#038;sid=aI4IdHYuAl94">Read entire article</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.infowars.com/upper-bracket-tax-may-be-needed-for-afghan-war-cost-levin-says/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>176</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>In Afghanistan &#8220;people hate the Americans from the bottom of their hearts&#8221;</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/in-afghanistan-people-hate-the-americans-from-the-bottom-of-their-hearts/</link>
		<comments>http://www.infowars.com/in-afghanistan-people-hate-the-americans-from-the-bottom-of-their-hearts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:01:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World at War]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=20575</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Times Online</strong> &#124; Afghans say President Karzai's five-year handover is not soon enough.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Jerome Starkey</strong><br />
Times Online<br />
November 20, 2009</p>
<p><ul class="ppani"><li>A d v e r t i s e m e n t</li><li><a href="http://www.efoodsdirect.com/holidaySpecial.html?aid=13&adid=14" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.infowars.com/images/banners/Holiday-Special-335_205.gif" alt="efoods" width="335" height="205" border="0" title="In Afghanistan people hate the Americans from the bottom of their hearts Photo" /></a></li></ul>“People hate the Americans from the bottom of their hearts,” Haji Akhtar Mohammed Shinwari said as he recalled how the US military had brought death to his homeland.</p>
<p>For residents of Shinwar, a village in distant Nangahar province, the message from President Karzai’s address yesterday that the Americans would hand over security over the next five years was disappointing.</p>
<p>At the village bazaar, Mr Shinwari told The Times that he could not wait that long. In 2007, a unit of special forces was speeding along a busy road a few miles from his village when they opened fire, killing 19 people and wounding 50. The unit responsible was sent home and the local US commander described the incident as a “stain on our honour”. He paid out almost $40,000 (£25,000) in compensation. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/Afghanistan/article6924182.ece">Read entire article</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.infowars.com/in-afghanistan-people-hate-the-americans-from-the-bottom-of-their-hearts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>190</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UK seeking new world order by Afghan war</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/uk-seeking-new-world-order-by-afghan-war/</link>
		<comments>http://www.infowars.com/uk-seeking-new-world-order-by-afghan-war/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2009 17:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World at War]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=20256</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Press TV</strong> &#124; According to the latest opinion poll, an increasing majority of Britons want the country's 9,000 troops out of Afghanistan within a year.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong><a href="http://www.presstv.ir/detail.aspx?id=111390&#038;sectionid=351020403">Press TV</a></strong><br />
November 16, 2009</p>
<p>Despite reports of the UK&#8217;s plan for peace talks with the Taliban, Premier Gordon Brown defends Britain&#8217;s military involvement in the Afghan war, saying his country must play a full role in &#8216;changing the world&#8217;.</p>
<p>&#8220;I believe that Britain can and must play its full part in changing the world,&#8221; the British prime minister said Monday.</p>
<p>&#8220;Britain can lead in the construction of a new world order,&#8221; he said in a speech, extracts of which have been released by Downing Street.</p>
<p>Supporting the UK&#8217;s military mission in the war-torn country, Brown said more has been planned in 2009 and &#8220;enacted with greater success&#8221; to cripple al-Qaeda than in any year since 2001.</p>
<p>&#8220;So I vigorously defend our action in Afghanistan and Pakistan because al-Qaeda is today the biggest source of threat to our national security,&#8221; he noted.</p>
<p><ul class="ppani"><li>A d v e r t i s e m e n t</li><li><a href="http://www.efoodsdirect.com/holidaySpecial.html?aid=13&adid=14" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.infowars.com/images/banners/Holiday-Special-335_205.gif" alt="efoods" width="335" height="205" border="0" title="UK seeking new world order by Afghan war Photo" /></a></li></ul>The premier is set to give his annual foreign policy speech to the London Lord Mayor&#8217;s banquet at Guildhall on Monday evening.</p>
<p>The US, with cooperation of its European allies including Britain, invaded Afghanistan in 2001 to allegedly eradicate the Taliban and arrest militant leaders.</p>
<p>But more than eight years after the so-called war on terrorism began, a leaked memo has revealed that the British government has been seeking reconciliation with Taliban&#8217;s leadership council based in the Pakistani city of Quetta.</p>
<p>Britain&#8217;s state television BBC reported on Saturday that the memo proposed that &#8220;reconciled&#8221; Taliban should be removed from the UN sanctions list.</p>
<p>After the beginning of the war, Taliban leader Mullah Omar and al-Qaeda leader Osama Bin Laden fled to Quetta, where they received the support of Pakistani security officials.</p>
<p>The eight-year-old war in Afghanistan has so far failed to kill or arrest the main militant commanders.</p>
<p>Brown, who is tipped to lose a general election to the opposition Conservatives due by June, is under tense pressure at home as public support for the war is waning.</p>
<p>According to the latest opinion poll, an increasing majority of Britons want the country&#8217;s 9,000 troops out of Afghanistan within a year.</p>
<p>Some 71 percent of Britons would back a phased withdrawal of British forces within 12 months, a poll conducted by the Independent showed on Sunday.</p>
<p>In the latest casualty on Sunday, a British soldier was killed while on foot patrol in southern Afghanistan, taking the death toll to 233. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.infowars.com/uk-seeking-new-world-order-by-afghan-war/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>61</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Army Sends Infant to Protective Services, Mom to Afghanistan</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/army-sends-infant-to-protective-services-mom-to-afghanistan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.infowars.com/army-sends-infant-to-protective-services-mom-to-afghanistan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 17:17:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World at War]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=20158</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Dahr Jamail</strong> &#124; A single mother is being threatened with a military court-martial if she does not agree to deploy to Afghanistan, despite having been told she would be granted extra time to find someone to care for son.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Dahr Jamail</strong><br />
Common Dreams<br />
November 14, 2009</p>
<p><ul class="ppani"><li>A d v e r t i s e m e n t</li><li><a href="http://www.efoodsdirect.com/holidaySpecial.html?aid=13&adid=14" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.infowars.com/images/banners/Holiday-Special-335_205.gif" alt="efoods" width="335" height="205" border="0" title="Army Sends Infant to Protective Services, Mom to Afghanistan Photo" /></a></li></ul>U.S. Army Specialist Alexis Hutchinson, a single mother, is being threatened with a military court-martial if she does not agree to deploy to Afghanistan, despite having been told she would be granted extra time to find someone to care for her 11-month-old son while she is overseas.</p>
<p>Hutchinson, of Oakland, California, is currently being confined at Hunter Army Airfield near Savannah, Georgia, after being arrested. Her son was placed into a county foster care system.</p>
<p>Hutchinson has been threatened with a court martial if she does not agree to deploy to Afghanistan on Sunday, Nov. 15. She has been attempting to find someone to take care of her child, Kamani, while she is deployed overseas, but to no avail.</p>
<p>According to the family care plan of the U.S. Army, Hutchinson was allowed to fly to California and leave her son with her mother, Angelique Hughes of Oakland.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.commondreams.org/headline/2009/11/13-7">Read entire article</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.infowars.com/army-sends-infant-to-protective-services-mom-to-afghanistan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>308</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Security Worsens As Taliban Move Into Northern Afghanistan</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/security-worsens-as-taliban-move-into-northern-afghanistan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.infowars.com/security-worsens-as-taliban-move-into-northern-afghanistan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 17:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World at War]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=20153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Radio Free Europe</strong> &#124; When Taliban fighters hijacked two NATO fuel tankers along the new northern supply route into Afghanistan earlier this month, they generated international headlines.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Zarif Nazar, Charles Recknagel</strong><br />
Radio Free Europe<br />
November 14, 2009</p>
<p><ul class="ppani"><li>A d v e r t i s e m e n t</li><li><a href="http://www.efoodsdirect.com/holidaySpecial.html?aid=13&adid=14" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.infowars.com/images/banners/Holiday-Special-335_205.gif" alt="efoods" width="335" height="205" border="0" title="Security Worsens As Taliban Move Into Northern Afghanistan  Photo" /></a></li></ul>When Taliban fighters hijacked two NATO fuel tankers along the new northern supply route into Afghanistan earlier this month, they generated international headlines.</p>
<p>NATO planes detected the militants after the vehicles stalled in a riverbed, and the commander of the German troops in Konduz Province ordered an air strike that killed scores of civilians and fighters who had gathered there, possibly to siphon off fuel.</p>
<p>The September 4 incident was surprising not only for the number of victims, but also because of where it took place. Not in the south or east, where Afghanistan&#8217;s &#8220;hot&#8221; war is being fought, but where the situation is supposed to be quiet.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rferl.org/content/Security_Worsens_as_Taliban_Move_Into_Northern_Afghanistan/1830036.html">Read entire article</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.infowars.com/security-worsens-as-taliban-move-into-northern-afghanistan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thousands of guns U.S. sent to Afghanistan are missing</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/thousands-of-guns-u-s-sent-to-afghanistan-are-missing/</link>
		<comments>http://www.infowars.com/thousands-of-guns-u-s-sent-to-afghanistan-are-missing/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 18:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World at War]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=20049</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>CNN</strong> &#124; More than one-third of all weapons the United States has procured for Afghanistan's government are missing, according to a government report. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>CNN</strong><br />
November 12, 2009</p>
<p><ul class="ppani"><li>A d v e r t i s e m e n t</li><li><a href="http://www.efoodsdirect.com/holidaySpecial.html?aid=13&adid=14" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.infowars.com/images/banners/Holiday-Special-335_205.gif" alt="efoods" width="335" height="205" border="0" title="Thousands of guns U.S. sent to Afghanistan are missing Photo" /></a></li></ul>More than one-third of all weapons the United States has procured for Afghanistan&#8217;s government are missing, according to a government report released Thursday.</p>
<p> The U.S. military failed to &#8220;maintain complete inventory records for an estimated 87,000 weapons &#8212; or about 36 percent &#8212; of the 242,000 weapons that the United States procured and shipped to Afghanistan from December 2004 through June 2008,&#8221; a U.S. Government Accountability Office report states.</p>
<p>&#8220;Accountability lapses occurred throughout the supply chain,&#8221; it says.</p>
<p>The Defense Department spent roughly $120 million during that period to acquire a range of small arms and light weapons for the Afghan National Security Forces, including rifles, machine guns and rocket-propelled grenade launchers.</p>
<p><a href="http://edition.cnn.com/2009/WORLD/asiapcf/02/12/missing.afghan.weapons/index.html">Read entire article</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.infowars.com/thousands-of-guns-u-s-sent-to-afghanistan-are-missing/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>117</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US warns over Koreas naval clash</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/us-warns-over-koreas-naval-clash/</link>
		<comments>http://www.infowars.com/us-warns-over-koreas-naval-clash/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 19:33:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World at War]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=19940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>BBC</strong> &#124; The White House has warned Pyongyang against any escalation of hostilities after a North Korean vessel clashed with a warship from the South.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>BBC</strong><br />
November 10, 2009</p>
<p><ul class="ppani"><li>A d v e r t i s e m e n t</li><li><a href="http://www.efoodsdirect.com/holidaySpecial.html?aid=13&adid=14" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.infowars.com/images/banners/Holiday-Special-335_205.gif" alt="efoods" width="335" height="205" border="0" title="US warns over Koreas naval clash  Photo" /></a></li></ul>The White House has warned Pyongyang against any escalation of hostilities after a North Korean vessel clashed with a warship from the South.</p>
<p>The navy crews exchanged fire near a disputed maritime border between the two countries; each side accused the other of violating the sea boundary.</p>
<p>The two navies have engaged in deadly exchanges twice along their western sea border in the past decade.</p>
<p>The row comes days before US President Barack Obama is to visit Asia. </p>
<p><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/8353451.stm">Read entire article</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.infowars.com/us-warns-over-koreas-naval-clash/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>71</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Obama to Discuss More Troops for Afghanistan</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/obama-to-discuss-more-troops-for-afghanistan/</link>
		<comments>http://www.infowars.com/obama-to-discuss-more-troops-for-afghanistan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 18:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World at War]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=19932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Bloomberg</strong> &#124; Obama will discuss four options for a buildup of U.S. forces in Afghanistan when he meets tomorrow with his national security team.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Roger Runningen</strong><br />
Bloomberg<br />
November 10, 2009</p>
<p>President Barack Obama will discuss four options for a buildup of U.S. forces in Afghanistan when he meets tomorrow with his national security team, White House spokesman Robert Gibbs said.</p>
<p>Gibbs, speaking to reporters traveling with the president to Fort Hood, Texas, declined to give details on those options.</p>
<p><object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/sYb4I1bOsVA&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0&#038;color1=0x2b405b&#038;color2=0x6b8ab6"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/sYb4I1bOsVA&#038;hl=en&#038;fs=1&#038;rel=0&#038;color1=0x2b405b&#038;color2=0x6b8ab6" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object></p>
<p>Obama is under pressure to make a decision on whether to grant a request by his top commander in the field, General Stanley McChrystal, to send 40,000 more troops. That would expand the 68,000-strong U.S. force that will be in Afghanistanby the end of the year, including 21,000 that Obama authorized earlier this year. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&#038;sid=aFErgTTAv9Nw&#038;pos=9">Read entire article</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.infowars.com/obama-to-discuss-more-troops-for-afghanistan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>73</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The GOP Should Dump the Neocons</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/the-gop-should-dump-the-neocons/</link>
		<comments>http://www.infowars.com/the-gop-should-dump-the-neocons/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 17:46:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[World at War]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=19871</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<strong>Edward H. Crane </strong> &#124; Today, it is difficult to find noninterventionists in either party.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Edward H. Crane </strong><br />
CATO Institute<br />
November 9, 2009</p>
<p><ul class="ppani"><li>A d v e r t i s e m e n t</li><li><a href="http://www.efoodsdirect.com/holidaySpecial.html?aid=13&adid=14" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.infowars.com/images/banners/Holiday-Special-335_205.gif" alt="efoods" width="335" height="205" border="0" title="The GOP Should Dump the Neocons Photo" /></a></li></ul>The founders envisioned a federal government constitutionally limited to defending our rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. For that to happen, we must have at least one political party that strongly advocates limiting the power of government. For much of the 19th century, that party was the Democrats. For the early part of the 20th century and from the early 1960s through 1988, that party was the Republicans.</p>
<p>Today, it is difficult to find noninterventionists in either party.</p>
<p>The Democrats demonstrate a disdain for capitalism, free trade and the validity of contracts. They cheer the restriction of certain types of speech on campus and in federal law, and think nation-building is our moral obligation, even when there is no discernible U.S. interest involved. Lately, the Democrats have been popularly associated with principled opposition to waging war in far-flung corners of the globe. But evidence on the ground today tells a somewhat different tale.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.cato.org/pub_display.php?pub_id=10935">Read entire article</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.infowars.com/the-gop-should-dump-the-neocons/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>77</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
