 |
|
|
|||
 |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
 |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
CBC’s The Fifth Estate: The Unofficial Story
- Text size
CBC
November 29, 2009
On September 11, 2001 the world watched in shock and disbelief as planes flew in to New Yorks World Trade Center and the Pentagon in Washington, and Americans realized they were under attack. But by whom? What really happened? In The Unofficial Story, the fifth estates Bob McKeown introduces us to people who believe the real force behind the attacks was not Osama Bin Laden, but the U.S. government itself.
- A d v e r t i s e m e n t
In The Unofficial Story, Bob McKeown explores why these questions and theories are growing in popularity.
Youll meet some of the leading proponents of truther theories: Richard Gage, an American architect, explains how the WTC twin towers and the lesser known Tower #7 could only have crumbled as they did due to explosive charges placed inside the buildings. Others, including Canadian professor Kee Dewdney, insist that the story of the brave fight by the passengers of United Airlines Flight 93 must have been a hoax. But, youll also hear from others who dispel truther theories and try to understand why, from JFKs assassination to the moon landing to 9/11, a culture of conspiracy springs up around certain historic events.
Despite the difference of opinion between those who blame the hijackers and those who blame their own government, the real importance of the fight over 9/11 truth is that it may have less to do with the past than the future.
Full Length and Interviews Here:
http://www.cbc.ca/fifth/2009-2010/the…
Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth
http://www.ae911truth.org/
NYC Coalition For Accountability Now
http://nyccan.org/index.php
-
- Social bookmarks
- Email this article
-
- Print this page
- Share on Twitter
November 29th, 2009 at 5:06 pm
wow
algorgonzo Reply:
November 29th, 2009 at 5:46 pm
never forget the coverup of 911 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BA8nvCPnHJ4
V Reply:
November 30th, 2009 at 7:10 am
CBC, my coutry’s public broadcaster, similar to PBS, is sharing truth? Glad to see my taxes being used for something constructive.
crazycanuck Reply:
December 2nd, 2009 at 10:59 pm
YEAH, A CONSTRUCTIVE COVERUP!
Max Reply:
December 3rd, 2009 at 4:19 pm
I emailed The Fifth Estate a year ago and called them a bunch of half-assed cope outs but hey they are getting better. Good Good. At least a few in the bulls--- media don’t need to be strung up, a couple are heroes.
Gooliano Reply:
November 29th, 2009 at 5:49 pm
Maybe this is predictive programming.
ie. Yep, we did this to produce a police state, and here it comes.
soooo…shut up, pay your taxes or we’ll make You disappear.
Maybe ?
Vote Third Party Reply:
November 29th, 2009 at 10:25 pm
Thanks for posting this…I missed it on TV. We wholeheartedly support Richard Gage and his work for the 9/11 truth movement. I’m proud of you Richard!
http://www.Vote3rdPartyNow.org
Shock Collar Reply:
November 30th, 2009 at 2:30 am
I noticed a few brain farts on those clips… You will have to watch and pay VERY close attention to what they’re saying to catch it…
I will give you some..
Clip 3 – 4:08 “RIGHT FROM THE BEGINING IT DIDNT LOOK LIKE THAT TO ME AND IT DIDNT LOOK LIKE THAT TO MY PEOPLE”
***Ohkay!, what begining are you refering to? Did you watch it collapse? Your people??? Where did this guy come from – investiage him on the fact that he said “They didnt fall at free fall speed”.. Something does NOT add up with this guy… Is this guy the hired fker that had access “with his people” through MARVIN BUSH to the WTC buildings? HOW is this guy credable?
Is this guy critiqin his work? By the way.. little paper with scribbles could have been created by anyone.. Show me a certified copy of the sezmic readings… OH, the WTC7 DID show readings before the collapse.. but they cut that out FAST.. take a closer look!
Shock Collar Reply:
November 30th, 2009 at 2:38 am
HERE is the kicker!!!
This man unknowingly ADMITS that CUTTING the beams was REQUIRED to bring the building down!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! HOLY s---
Clip 3 – 7:25…
SOooo.. you dont think demo did it, but YOU SAY “Cutting the beams was required to bring the building down!!!!!!!!!!!!”
DUDE!!!
Shock Collar Reply:
November 30th, 2009 at 2:40 am
WHY does Demo man have graphs of the ground vibration?? Whats the purpose of him having those?
Shock Collar Reply:
November 30th, 2009 at 2:53 am
OK heres some more…
Clip 3 – 7:48 NORTH TOWER VIBRATIONS –
Clip 3 – 8:16 (?) No mention on what building it was….Look at the readings tho.
Comon sense here says they are two different structures due to the vibration paterns shown on the graphs.. Right? They all fell the same, built the same, so wouldnt they generate similar vibration patterns???
Or did he make an honest mistake and show you WTC building 7 graph first and the North tower graph second? If thats the case – I see s--- loads of activity!!!!
If im wrong, then it would be plausable that the tower graphs showing 75% more vibration activity would have been the Towers and not WTC7… are they not BIGGER than WTC7??????????? We are talking about Mass + distance + speed – right?
His logic is all OVER the fkn place… How about making these graphs public.. I cant find them
Shock Collar Reply:
November 30th, 2009 at 3:02 am
INTERNATIONALLY RECOGNIZED DEMOLITION EXPERT!!!!
INTERNATIONALLY!!!
INTERNATIONALLY!!!!
HIRED TO WORK IN THE AFTERMATH of 9/11 —- hmmmmm why did they need an internationally recognized demolition man on a clean up crew??????????????????????? Am I missing something?? Was he appart of the Investigation or the problem?
Clip 4 – 3:55
Sorry all the posts i made said “Clip 3″… My mistake I ment CLIP 4….. OR Part 4-5
sucker4lush Reply:
November 30th, 2009 at 6:47 am
I’m not even done watching the vids yet, but I’m stoppping to comment on the same thing.
The demo expert is supposedly recounting his initial thoughts when 9/11 first happened and…
The first thing he thought when seeing it was, “This is NOT a controlled demo”"?
Then he says he’s not a thermite expert… but he knows it would take 100 tons of the stuff. Plus “many people and much time”.
He’s telling us how difficult it is for professionals to intentionally implode a skyscraper, while expecting us to believe it was done haphazardly?
I guess when they need skyscrapers brought down, they should just hire some teamsters with a wrecking ball and some guys to light fires inside?…
HE Is Admittedly NOT an expert Reply:
November 30th, 2009 at 11:02 am
on thermate, thermite, whatever. It was stated, however, that with thermate, there is no loud bang or big flash, YET, this guy points to a printout from a sizemograph & says “If there had been a catalyzing agent( Explosives) there would be a spike over here”, as he points to the printout,
REALLY? If Thermate does its damage with heat, & not an explosion, which is what it has to do, in order to not make a big bang, then WHY would I expect the sizemograph to record it? I doubt seriously a welders TORCH would make the line bounce & those cut steel.
Shock Collar Reply:
November 30th, 2009 at 11:07 am
One thing IS in fact consistant..
NO ONE touches the topic of Marvin Bush… no one…
If everysingle person knew about Marvin Bush, I think we would have a problem on our hands no?
Shock Collar Reply:
November 30th, 2009 at 11:12 am
Also,
Why hasnt one single investigatin taken place over the insurance company that paid out? What company(s) were involved in the insurance portion of this and who are ALL the beneficiaries? WHY hasnt the insruance company conducted their own investigation…?? WHY wasnt the insruance companies allowed access to the site to conduct their OWN investigation? They are the ones paying the bill no? Or did the TAX payers flip the insruance bill????
There are MORE questions out there to be answered than any of you realize…
I personally ride the fence, I do not believe it was an inside job or not.. I DO however see a TON of problems and questions that need be answered and I believe that investigators are targeting the wrong people to get their information…
I think the insurance companies should be reviewed publically and completely.
Money trail of 9/11 might un cover a lot of questions. But, ive yet to see ANYthing of this sort.
Was USAA the company that paid out to the owner(s) of the WTC complexs?
911 Reply:
November 29th, 2009 at 9:49 pm
Wow, Alex sold out the truthers. I wonder if it was money or intimidation.
Notice how few 911 articles he has, then this garbage?
what? Reply:
November 29th, 2009 at 10:49 pm
Wow you’re an idiot. Just because he links to another media outlets presentation doesn’t mean he supports its view. It’s good to be inform how mainstream media outlets report on the event, good or bad.
Shock Collar Reply:
November 30th, 2009 at 2:55 am
Those clips are disinfo man… discrediting and not pointing out the TOP findings.
However, I am adding this to my speculation – there are a TON of mistakes in it… Hell, read above and go to the cuts i provided!
This guy controdicts everything he says.. AND HE WAS HIRED TO WORK AT THE WTC!!!!
Some Dude Reply:
November 30th, 2009 at 4:32 am
Awesome , looking forward to seeing your video/movie/documentary up here soon.
Hope you can take time out from being a useless nit-picking duchebag to focus on it…
Long Live Richard Gage, DRG, and Alex Jones….
DEATH TO THE NEW WORLD ORDER…..
Mad Hatter Reply:
November 30th, 2009 at 8:47 am
STFU “SomeDude.”
Nit Picking? WTF do you think a real investigation is? Nit Picking??? STFU!!! PissAnts like you ARE the New World Order.
Shock Collar Reply:
November 30th, 2009 at 11:21 am
Why has there been so much speculation about Chemtrails, yet NOT ONE SINGLE investigation!?
Wouldnt it be one of the easyer things to do…. SOMEONE with a plane go up multiple times and take samples of these trails???????
Why cannot someone do this? hmmmm? Any scientists out ther? hmm hmm hmmm??
If it is what some say, why dont you take a fkn sample of a freash one!!! THEY seem to stay in the sky for HRS AND HRS!!!
Some are so big that it looks like a 1000 mile tube worm cloud…
Where are the metiorologists in this matter? Cloud experts?
There simply isnt and wont be, cause chemtrails are fiction…. and possibly the easyest thing in the world to prove/disaprove for the fact that they exsist and are created on a daily basis by the hundreds nation wide…
logic and comon sense people
Malecon Reply:
December 3rd, 2009 at 6:51 pm
You sane?
Effy Reply:
November 30th, 2009 at 12:37 am
This is how THEY did it.
http://video.google.ca/videopl.....608625413#
your welcome
C Reply:
December 2nd, 2009 at 9:24 pm
Incredibly well balanced!
Hangtime96 Reply:
December 5th, 2009 at 9:05 pm
WHAT HAS ALWAYS BOTHERED ME ABOUT THE PLANES THAT WERE INVOLVED IN 911 .
Flight 11 hit the North Tower at 8:46 am , filmed by a newscrew on the street blocks away from the North Tower . It seemed to have the official colors of the airlines .
Flight 175 that hit the South Tower at 9:03am wasn’t a official airline , it was gray , no windows and had a addtional piece attached to the underside of it as clearly visible in videos of that day .
Flight 77 hit the pentagon at 9:37am . a few frames from a on-site camera, many witiness’es and the impact area doesn’t suggest that a aircraft that large couldn’t of made such a small hole .
Flight 93 that crashed in a field Shanksfield, Penn. at 10:03am didn’t have no evidence of human remains at the crash site , in fact , it was said by many rescue worker who were dispached to the site that a looked simply like a big hole with pieces of aircraft spread around .
Okay , if Flight 175 wasn’t a official color aircraft , Flight 77 that hit the Pentagon wasn’t a Jumbo Jet , Flight 93 didn’t have any human remains at the crah site .
If these Aircraft that hit these 3 areas weren’t Passenger Aircraft , then what happened to the passengers who were on board? Did they ever exit ? Were they hearded into a area and executed ?
To wonder what happened to these people if their planes were not used in 911 is what has been haunting me for years .
networkd Reply:
December 7th, 2009 at 7:56 pm
“One things for sure…9/11 truthers are not going anywhere anytime soon…”
haha yea except those FEMA camps…
For our sakes lets hope he’s right
DaveHash Reply:
December 8th, 2009 at 7:32 am
I talked to one of my friends online who lives by Hopkins arirport and he said that in the weeks before 9/11 the police were out closing down observation points that looked into the airport. This is strange and the timing is right. He said that he heard that 3 planes landed due to “bomb threats” there and that the workers from the airport were on tv that day saying they saw a United Airlines plane land and was escorted to the end of the runway near the NASA hangar. They said on live tv that they saw the passengers leave and then were herded into the hangar and then into large grey vans. Also, after 9/11 a reporter tried to go near the hangar to find out what was inside and was met with Military guards and was told to leave or she would be shot.
November 29th, 2009 at 5:08 pm
i watched this. the interviewer was patronizing the truth movement. other than gage he found the craziest people to interview for the truth side
Effy Reply:
November 30th, 2009 at 12:36 am
http://video.google.ca/videopl.....608625413#
Crito Reply:
November 30th, 2009 at 2:45 pm
Yeah, how was the lid kept on the Manhattan project? How was the lid kept on the development of the stealth fighter and bomber. Thousands of people were involved you know.
I know one thing that really helps keep the lid on government secrets: hiring the dumbest investigative journalists you can find.
November 29th, 2009 at 5:10 pm
How can I watch the full length video living in the states?
the truth is out there Reply:
November 29th, 2009 at 8:09 pm
try this…http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7c2MF_1WRn4&feature=related
MJ Reply:
November 30th, 2009 at 3:32 pm
@the truth is out there:
You can watch the full documentary here:
http://www.cbc.ca/fifth/2009-2.....ial_story/
November 29th, 2009 at 5:20 pm
I seen this on justintv.
Spellcheck Reply:
November 29th, 2009 at 5:50 pm
Saw, not seen
cougar Reply:
November 29th, 2009 at 6:58 pm
KMA
Spellcheck Reply:
November 29th, 2009 at 7:11 pm
LMB
Hot Mama Reply:
November 29th, 2009 at 7:08 pm
Dear Revered Grammar Policeman that corrected a replier’s verb usuage:
i felt moved to dedicated this song (set to Jingle Bells to you)…May the spirit be with u!
Oh Grammar Police, Oh Grammar Police
How for art thou, all mighty Grammar Police?
i took a seat in public education,
therefore my speak is not the bestest of them
Oh Grammar Police, Oh Grammar Police
pay for a private school-a-tion
Why do i pay exorbinant property taxes
local school kids get no better learning
Oh Grammar Police, Oh Grammar Police
Please put me out of my misery!
F ck Spellcheck!!! Reply:
November 29th, 2009 at 8:00 pm
Hot Mama: Nice Job!!! F ck Spellcheck!!!
cougar Reply:
November 30th, 2009 at 1:27 pm
Thanks , some people feel the need to be a critic . Love your song , Hot Mama ! I’m not perfect , thank you to F ck Spellcheck .
Malecon Reply:
December 3rd, 2009 at 4:47 pm
In faulty grammar lies confusing communication. THAT’S THE POINT.
Now, grow up and learn to write yourself.
Hot Mama Reply:
December 3rd, 2009 at 4:49 pm
Malecon,
It looks like you don’t understand sarcasm.
Hot Mama
machinationation Reply:
December 10th, 2009 at 6:03 pm
Taught like teach not like tight!
machinationation Reply:
December 10th, 2009 at 6:01 pm
I get corrected everyday on that one. Hard to fight it once it’s ingrained….it just doesn’t feel right…but it is.
November 29th, 2009 at 5:20 pm
Alex will go on and on about Climategate, but NOTHING about Chemtrails.
If you think it has nothing to do with a cooling planet the last decade, think again.
If we’re going to talk about the earths climate, then you HAVE TO talk about CHEMTRAILS.
I think he won’t get into it because he really doesn’t know much about it.
He knows if he starts talking about their patents and the fact that we have been cooling over the last decade, it wouldn’t fit into his “manmade global warming scam” theory.
This issue should not be ignored, but so far it is here.
WakeUp Reply:
November 29th, 2009 at 5:42 pm
Hey Ken, go to YouTube and type in “Carnicom chemtrails alex jones.” You will hear a 9-part interview Alex did with the key researcher in the chemtrail debate.
holdurbreath Reply:
November 29th, 2009 at 6:09 pm
Hi Ken,
This is from the e-mails from UEA,
oct 14 2009 10:17 AM
Kevin Trenberth wrote:
Hi Tom(Wigley)
“How come you do not agree with a statement that says we are no where near close to knowing where energy is going or whether clouds are changing to make the planet brighter.We are not close to balancing the energy budget.The fact that we can not account for what is happenning in the climate system MAKES ANY CONSIDERATION OF GEOENGINEERING QUITE HOPELESS as we will never be able to tell if it is successful or not,it is a travesty. Kevin.
Angel Reply:
November 29th, 2009 at 6:27 pm
Ken,
Alex has talked about the chemtrails and that it’s being used to alter our planets’ climate. Listen more often to the show, and maybe you’ll be more informed.
Mad Hatter Reply:
November 30th, 2009 at 8:51 am
If you think chemtrails have anything to do with the cooling of the planet you are a basket case of idiocy. While we argue that the entire human output of CO2 does not affect the temperature you assert that just the chemtrails from airplanes do. STFU and learn how to think before you open your ignorant mouth.
You cause confusion and contention, that is all you are doing, but of course that is probably your actual goal.
in the woods Reply:
December 4th, 2009 at 9:49 pm
I work out side for 40 years.I saw the chemtrails for sometime before people started to talk much about them. When your in the weather all the time you learn to live with weather change. Some days when the planes were really going at it.[ I call it fogging us in ] the air would chill up fast , not like a cold front coming , other days the sun would heat your skin in short order. Whatever those chemtrails are doing are not doing I don’t no but people laugh at me in the early days of chemtrails when I said there fogging us in. Its like a lens and sometimes like a cover. When it comes to confusion and contention who isn’t there yet.
November 29th, 2009 at 5:21 pm
Another 9/11 story that purposely leaves out the most damaging facts. They even put the 9/11 truth movement in the same class as the moon conspiracy to make the 9/11 truth movement look like crazies.
They circumvent the FACT that cell phones can not work at above 8000 feet max, never mind 30,000 feet… to hide this fact as soon as possible, they make sure to highlight the crazy theory of dropping the real airlines in the ocean…. but they never got back to how it is an absolute impossibility for cell phones to work.
The main stream media will NEVER tell the full story because they are just another arm of the government
OOOH MATRON Reply:
November 29th, 2009 at 6:57 pm
f--- ALL THAT LETS JUST TALK ABOUT WTC7 – DONE AND DUSTED*
oh yeah? Reply:
November 29th, 2009 at 8:49 pm
http://www.youtube.com/user/RK.....96MZOZyilo
nph Reply:
November 30th, 2009 at 12:59 am
Really you take that video as credible a bunch of text over resident evil 4’s eirie music…. what a joke
sucker4lush Reply:
November 30th, 2009 at 6:52 am
Bob, are you sure?
How do you know?
Impossible in 2001… or still?
sucker4lush Reply:
November 30th, 2009 at 7:03 am
Well, according to that vid, all of the calls were very possible.
So…
I guess that means 19 Muslim extremists with box cutters actually did it.
If you’re ever in a large crowd being threatened by a few guys with box cutters…
Be Afraid! Be very afraid!
Riposte Reply:
November 30th, 2009 at 7:38 am
Exactly – just more controlled opposition here.
Malecon Reply:
December 3rd, 2009 at 4:50 pm
The FBI has already confirmed on the record that the cell phone calls didn’t take place. Take it from there.
November 29th, 2009 at 5:24 pm
I watched and taped most of it. Overall it was the most fair view on mainstream tv for both sides I have seen so far.
sucker4lush Reply:
November 30th, 2009 at 7:04 am
Don’t confuse long with fair.
Mad Hatter Reply:
November 30th, 2009 at 8:56 am
Yes, those who are quick to compromise always live to become slaves.
IF IT IS A LIE – IT IS A f---ING LIE. End of story. There is no such thing as “Well they got out a little truth” No, they just lull you back to sleep because your pet theory got tube time and then you get all elated and walk away saying “well see, it was more fair than usual…” What a crock.
November 29th, 2009 at 5:24 pm
Anyone with half a brain knows that 9/11 was an INSIDE JOB! The only people who won’t accept this fact and the only people who dismiss us as “conspiracy nuts” are the people who are so dumb that they wont shutup and listen for a few minutes.
If you don’t thing 9/11 was an inside job, then PROVE IT WASN’T. The burden of proof is on YOU if you dont thing it was an inside job. JUST LOOK AT THE EVIDENCE!
Merrie Reply:
November 29th, 2009 at 6:04 pm
If the truth in fact came out in 911 every other person would have to go commit suicide. Its very important for the coping mechanisms of the American people. The very thought that your own government would do this to its own people is unthinkable. People are fragile. Richard Gage is the messenger. Thanks Richard for your truth and research about the implosion of the world trade towers. Thermite was the cause. Where are the findings of the insurance companies? AIG they paid out than partied for compliance. KSM will take the blame and than it will all be over. Just a myth. 911 inside job! MCB
Malecon Reply:
December 3rd, 2009 at 4:52 pm
Excellent response. Thank you.
sucker4lush Reply:
November 30th, 2009 at 7:08 am
Good point. It’s the bottom line isn’t it?
Have they even come close to proving beyond a reasonable doubt 19 Arabs with box cutters did it WITH NO HELP?
Oops I forgot! It’s a war! Those standards don’t apply.
November 29th, 2009 at 5:26 pm
I know the fed did it, i was there.
Spellcheck Reply:
November 29th, 2009 at 5:51 pm
there – their
Hot Mama Reply:
November 29th, 2009 at 7:17 pm
Get a life!
Hot Mama Reply:
November 29th, 2009 at 7:27 pm
Dear SpellCheck (AKA Revered Grammar Policeman),
This song was written just for you. Please sing to the melody of Jingle Bells…
Oh Grammar Police, Oh Grammar Police,
How for art thou, revered Grammar Police?
i filled a seat in public education,
my grammar skills are not the bestest of them
Oh Grammar Police, Oh Grammar Police,
if only all children could afford a private school-a-tion!
My property taxes are exorbidant!
The local schools are full of baloney-ants
Oh Grammar Police, oh Grammar Police,
Quickly put me out of my misery!
cougar Reply:
November 30th, 2009 at 1:37 pm
Hot Mama , i have a friend that uses that name in MO. would that be you or another person . I have other feline name i use , just curious .
VancouverSucks Reply:
November 29th, 2009 at 8:59 pm
um not..its THERE
and this grammar police song is GAY.
shut up
Kiwibird Reply:
November 30th, 2009 at 5:39 am
Actually Spellcheck – it is “there”
Mad Hatter Reply:
November 30th, 2009 at 8:57 am
You know, it is childish and annoying when you are right regarding trifles. It is f---ING IRRITATING when you are WRONG.
HumanD Reply:
November 30th, 2009 at 11:47 am
Fail.
jerseygirl Reply:
December 2nd, 2009 at 10:45 am
Spellcheck: There is correct. It describes a place, location. Their shows possesion, ie. their house, their car.
Malecon Reply:
December 3rd, 2009 at 4:55 pm
You can’t even write correctly. You were “their” were you? Their what?
November 29th, 2009 at 5:34 pm
Why they felt they should “balance” the story with the view of the Corporate Media, I haven’t got a clue: it’s what we’ve had jammed down our throats by the MSM for 8 years now.
WTF.
November 29th, 2009 at 5:38 pm
I heard alex explaining a theory about how flight 93 was meant to hit building 7. flight 93 was shot down before. building 7 had to come down or else the explosives would be found.
Mortons Dialect Reply:
November 29th, 2009 at 5:54 pm
No no no….
Someone was in there with a bad case of gas, and it ignited.
Thermal Expansion…remember?
Jim Reply:
November 29th, 2009 at 6:39 pm
Here is the article I read about that. http://willyloman.wordpress.co.....E2%80%99t/
Actually Reply:
November 29th, 2009 at 9:52 pm
@Jim – wow, thanks!
Harvey Reply:
November 30th, 2009 at 1:04 pm
Jim: Thanks for pointing out why Building 7 probably really needed to come down. That is a very key point, IMO. and the likely reason that Larry Silverstein wanted it ‘Pulled” for insurance purposes isn’t really enough justification in the public eye for the dastardly deed.
It also points to the distinct possibility that some folks out there in the military refused to take orders from the masterminds.. Another conspiracy theory?.. Sorry..
Malecon Reply:
December 3rd, 2009 at 4:57 pm
No sorry. In fact a very reasonable point.
November 29th, 2009 at 6:05 pm
I call wtc towers just plain ol Jacob and boaz.
November 29th, 2009 at 6:34 pm
TRY BRINGING THIS UP AT THE XMAS FAMILY DINNER – YOU COWARDS!
COME ON! WATCH THE EYES ROLL! YOU CONSPIRACY LOON YOU!
Hot Mama Reply:
November 29th, 2009 at 7:15 pm
Love you too!
canuck rage Reply:
November 30th, 2009 at 4:40 pm
and they will get what they deserve. simple as that. you are a coward talkin s--- on here with no one to kick your ass for the stupid things you say.
November 29th, 2009 at 6:37 pm
Were explosives pre-planted into the WTC? FEMA’s Project Godzilla. http://investigate911.se/articles/godzilla.html
November 29th, 2009 at 6:40 pm
It seems to me that the Elites are using shows like this to act like human pressure valves, releasing the pressure before the pressure cooker explodes, and giving them some extra time to come up with new ways to keep us under their thumb.
Celebrate our victory, and get back in the fight… we’ve got more to do.
sucker4lush Reply:
November 30th, 2009 at 7:14 am
Exactly. Deflate the some of the star 9/11 CT’s. So the uninitiated Dancing With the Stars crowd comes away feeling all the CTs have been dealt with.
November 29th, 2009 at 6:42 pm
Turn your T.V.s off! 9/11 biggest lie, Gobal Warming second biggest lie, I’m tired of the lies!
November 29th, 2009 at 6:43 pm
Its like the titanic hit the iceburg and is sinking fast and instead of getting in the lifeboats yall are bitchin at each other, the ship is not coming back up people. margarita island is full of opportunity cheapest cost of living in the world, 4 cent a gallon gas free health care no taxes, no hurricanes, all food is organic by law. for more info check out http://www.escapethestates.com I have plenty of references from people I have moved down here, jump on the underground railraod and find out what it is like to live in a country that has alot more freedom then the united states. Put your money in a different currency and get out with it and dont look back. soon the dollar will be worth nothing, then you are stuck like a turd in the toilet. thanks for listening, if you need help contact me, My wife and I have plenty of knowledge about living here on margarita island we moved here 3 years ago with 3 small children and 3 dogs. We had to get our kids away from the toxic foods and environment. We can help you escape the states no matter what situation you are in. We can also save you 30 to 40% off your airline tickets to the island.
OOOH MATRON Reply:
November 29th, 2009 at 6:55 pm
your paradise island will be under 13 meters of water in less that 3 years REPENT SINNER! REPENT!
Malecon Reply:
December 3rd, 2009 at 4:58 pm
Silly person.
November 29th, 2009 at 6:54 pm
Wow! I’m last! Bet you’re all jealous.
Does that guy still have the mint-flavored condoms? I prefer strawberry myself. Actually, I am interested in the 11 doorknobs. Are they still available? Hot Mama wants to know.
November 29th, 2009 at 6:54 pm
i am completely SHOCKED that more evidence has come out about 9/11 being THE MOST EVIL BLUFF of all time! SHOCK I TELL YOU!
November 29th, 2009 at 6:58 pm
PEOPLE EVERYWHERE ARE JUST SO f---ING STUPID
November 29th, 2009 at 7:13 pm
SpellCheck-
Did you like my song?
XOXO Hot Mama
Malecon Reply:
December 3rd, 2009 at 4:59 pm
Now go and play somewhere else.
November 29th, 2009 at 7:22 pm
JP Butterworth, well said. This is exactly it ! Example, you still have so many big fish saying Huh !!! what’s building # 7 ? It isn’t even a big secret anymore, many and many more people still, are just plain and simply too dumb or unwise to know the truth. We know it and the Elitist criminals know this even more.
November 29th, 2009 at 7:27 pm
Well that was disapointing. Could they have made truthers seem any crazier? It also seems like they spent more time with “official story” people than truthers.
November 29th, 2009 at 7:44 pm
The phone calls did not have to be all fake. Those planes are still unaccounted for and from the perspectives of the passengers and attendants they were indeed being hijacked and that is what the possibly real calls were reporting.
For a “truther” to say all the calls must be fake because some of them must be fake is for a ‘truther” to paint all of us into a corner which can often be easily and credibly refuted. Thus speculations on what happened outside of the facts we do know nearly always become a field day for the debunkers.
This report was of course biased towards the debunkers and thus a hit piece but not without progress being made for increased credibility on behalf of 9/11 truth. For example they characterized the unwillingness of Gates to speculate on why planes were used, since explosives alone could have been blamed on the Islamics, as meaningful evidence of fundamental difficulty with the premise that the government/media story was false.
Gates answered correctly but the argument that planes were not needed is not correct. Explosives to be planted with the precision required would be difficult to explain inside such secure buildings. The introduction of the planes allows for a nationwide security structure focused at every airport and extends the security mandate nationwide. Too bad they omitted the southern border, guess it was too long and politically incorrect to include.
Dave Ped Reply:
November 29th, 2009 at 8:04 pm
Gage not Gates doh
sucker4lush Reply:
November 30th, 2009 at 7:35 am
Right. The methodology is secondary. The point is ultimately about who the culprits of 9/11 were. But even if we swallow the official CT hook, line and sinker…
Did they prove these guys trained in Afghanistan… and if so… So what!? They trained in American military bases and flight school too, right? Should we invade the USA?
Wasn’t the Afghan invasion planned prior to 9/11? What does that mean?
What about the Israeli’s caught with trucks of explosives at the WTC and Holland tunnel? Why not invade Israel?
Why invade any country as a response to 9/11? And remain there for years, with hundreds of thousands of troops and mercenaries, killing hundreds of thousands of civilians and spending trillions of dollars?
Whoa, I think I stumbled onto something there. Trillions of dollars. Hmm…
What did the most highly decorated Marine in US history, Smedley Butler, say about war again?…
Malecon Reply:
December 3rd, 2009 at 5:05 pm
With explosives alone, the public image impact would not have been so powerful. It’s hard to televise internally planted explosives. Remember, imagery is everything. Planes and mythical “hijackers” were needed to create the necessary public outrage.
November 29th, 2009 at 7:56 pm
Man I did not know box cutters were so deadly? I wish i would have had one instead of my M16!
sucker4lush Reply:
November 30th, 2009 at 7:42 am
THANK YOU!
You sound like a military guy. I guess you’re not all dumb, stupid animals to be used as pawns, like Kissinger thinks…
Here’s the bottom line: A few guys with box cutters would get their asses kicked, holding up traffic at rush hour in America… much less trying to hijack a plane.
November 29th, 2009 at 7:59 pm
Conspiracy theory hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha
Malecon Reply:
December 3rd, 2009 at 5:06 pm
Did you have something useful to say?
November 29th, 2009 at 8:19 pm
On the 4th video Gage admits that if it was nano-thermite you wouldnt hear explosions…well didnt many hear explosions??>>if it was a controlled demolition from nano-thermite you wouldt hear explosions..hhmmmm..
DW Reply:
November 29th, 2009 at 11:24 pm
He didn’t say you wouldn’t hear explosions. I went back to the video to hear exactly what he said in comparison to your distortion of what he said.
November 29th, 2009 at 8:19 pm
Is it true that building #7 just fell on its own? And is it true that Germany’s gold kept under building #7 simply vanished during this fiasco?
Malecon Reply:
December 3rd, 2009 at 5:06 pm
It’s true.
November 29th, 2009 at 8:21 pm
ANNND seeing how NY is a city built an run by the Mob even more so when those buildings were built wouldnt it be plausible that those buildings were built with s---ty materials??
DW Reply:
November 29th, 2009 at 11:22 pm
Isn’t it plausible that you’re a shill for the official story?
j Reply:
November 30th, 2009 at 7:58 am
Well, let’s put it this way. It would be HIGHLY coincidental that buildings 1 & 2 were built with ’s---ty materials’, as was building 7 – over 100 yards away – yet buildings three and four (which were directly UNDER buildings 1 and 2 respectively) were still standing in the aftermath, even though buildings one and two fell on top of them.
So are we saying that buildings 1, 2 and 7 were built s---ty while 3 and 4 were built ’super-strong’? Doesn’t that just nag your logical intuition, just a little bit?
Melissa Reply:
November 30th, 2009 at 10:23 am
Awesome point…. I’ll have to check that one out…. thank you j
November 29th, 2009 at 8:26 pm
omg i swear tv is staged. the guy who was being interviewed about the airplane swap didnt even mention operation northwoods. instead he just sat there and was made a fool of. thanx for the whitewash CBC.
Harvey Reply:
November 30th, 2009 at 1:18 pm
Mr Dewdney was edited my friend and words were placed in his mouth by the media.. We did not hear what he really said, just selected parts.. The man is no dummy, believe me.. He really spilled the beans on the phony cell phone calls and went out of his way to prove they were really bunk.. He earns my applause!
Malecon Reply:
December 3rd, 2009 at 5:13 pm
Yep. He hired his own plane to fly at even lesser than those altitudes and test the cell phone behaviour. The cell tower transfer protocol couldn’t deal with it.
November 29th, 2009 at 8:27 pm
I didnt like the way that ended. With the one guy saying people from other countries asking him if americans did it or someone else. I think that was porposely put in, to create fear. Which would be a quite justified fear. We are at war for no reason, I think that is enough to piss some people off. So now we can get justifiably bombed by another country. Or hell, our government could do it again, an eliminate some more of us. Either way we are screwed.
November 29th, 2009 at 8:34 pm
9/11 was totally an inside job. There’s now pilots for 9/11 truth, engineers for 9/11 truth, we are change, firefighters for 9/11 truth, police officers for 9/11 truth, and Obama gets all the papers he needs to alert his group of crooks that now one believes the official story any more from Charlie Sheen and I bet he left the room and found the nearest trash can for them. Their is no creditability left in our government. Anyone paying attention is in awe of the sophisitcation and depth of corruption taking place almost daily now and things are only getting worst. I really think people should begin protesting, stop paying taxes if we can, and take to the streets. Our children are depending on us to secure some fraction of freedom for their future and not allow them to be enslaved.
Harvey Reply:
November 30th, 2009 at 1:27 pm
Jimmy: You are right on, IMO.. The tyranny in our existing society is simply unbelievable to those unwilling or unable to study and understand the situation. The absolute tyranny involved with 9-11 served to wake up many from a lifetime of slumber. including myself.
Malecon Reply:
December 3rd, 2009 at 5:14 pm
Agree with you and Jimmy4truth.
November 29th, 2009 at 8:44 pm
Is it just me or can Charlie Sheen NOT speak a coherent sentence without stuttering out and and and and and and..um um um um um um um ..i i i i i i i i ..unless reading from a script like Obama and his teleprompters…sad
DW Reply:
November 29th, 2009 at 11:26 pm
It’s just you.
You’re an asshole and degenerate.
Malecon Reply:
December 3rd, 2009 at 5:15 pm
He sure is.
November 29th, 2009 at 8:57 pm
why is it more believable that the CIA or US govt caused such a castastrophe than terrorists – on their own soil and killing so many of their own people? Many areas to dispute I guess (chemical, physics, architecturally, engineering) – but I would have to see better evidence than what was given by the supposed Truth Group to believe a govt would plan, execute and then be able to cover up such a devious plan that would have had to involved many people; engineers, scientists, blast experts, government to implement such a plan. What is the motive for the govt as opposed to terrorists? Why kill innocent people if one wants to covertly kill an enemy – why not send out a secret group to execute the target, the terrorists, and cover it up so that they haven’t gone against the Geneva Convention? Osama bin Laden’s group haven’t disputed being responsible for it? Would they do that if they knew their enemy, the USA govt, had done it instead? One could go on creating all kinds of holes in the Truth Group’s claims … better to read a good Robert Ludlem novel for great conspiracies ….
Climategate Reply:
November 29th, 2009 at 11:01 pm
Climategate was/is a worldwide conspiracy, involving people and politicians throughout the entire world, including most of mainstream media. How did they do it?
TheGhost Reply:
November 29th, 2009 at 11:06 pm
dude, seriously.. youre a f---in retard, have fun disputing that..
sleuth Reply:
November 30th, 2009 at 9:29 am
aren’t we mature!
LaughingBarry Reply:
November 29th, 2009 at 11:42 pm
It wasn’t so much “the government”… more like certain individuals within the government paying other individuals who may or may not have had any idea that they were actually working for the USA. Really though, that’s missing the point. The point is that it should be re-investigated. Whow knows? Maybe a foriegn “ally” is behind it?
Great Conspiracies Reply:
November 29th, 2009 at 11:42 pm
sleuth, don’t have to read a novel about great conspiracies, all you have to do is study climategate right now
j Reply:
November 30th, 2009 at 8:30 am
Sleuth, you’ve asked alot of questions which take time to answer. Here is a shot at some of them.
‘better evidence’ – how about the hole in the pentagon? 16 feet wide. How does a passenger jet fit into a 16 foot hole? How about no damage to the building where the wings, engines, tailwing should have hit? The windows of the building in those areas were still intact (can provide photos if necessary). How about the government being able to identify 156 out of 158 passengers (don’t quote those exact numbers – but it’s close) on the pentagon ‘plane’ through dental records, yet the only piece of identifiable plane wreckage you could pick up with your hand? Are teeth stronger than titanium these days? how about ABSOLUTELY NO plane wreckage in Shanksville? No nose, cockpit, fusilage, wing section, engine, or landing gear to speak of? NOTHING? No body parts, no luggage, no blood? How about the hundreds of witnesses on national television on the day (as well as firefighters, policemen and TELEVSION REPORTERS) saying the were hearing secondary explosions coming from the WTC buildings? It goes on and on, but it’s too long to type. You should research it.
Now, as for motive. Let’s get somethring straight – OBL did say that he never committed 911. There is NO video tape (not audio – but video. I think you understand the required difference) showing OBL admitting to 911. If you can provide it, please send me the link. Secondly, you can’t take over a country’s oil reserves by sending in an elite task force. Also, OBL was/is a CIA asset. There are pictures of him with Zbeignew Zbrezinski (Obama advisor) in the late 1970/early 80’s shaking hands. Besides, you would need something like buildings to fall in order to get the populace riled up enough to support a war, and you need planes to hit the building so that people, lilke (with all due respect) yourself, do not question WHY they fell. Investigation is the enemy of deception and the purveyor of truth.
The only holes, are the ones in the gov’t official version.
jerseygirl Reply:
December 2nd, 2009 at 11:14 am
The motive was to gain more control of the US citizens via the “Patriot Act” a TOTAL INVASION OF OUR PRIVACY. Now it’s been taken further with the “Patriot Act II”. When fear is injected MANY idiots will look to the govt. to “protect” them. Thus the govt. gains control over our lives. Through this “power” the dumbed down public has given them they have now turned the tables, and we, the people are being labeled as terrorists, ie. if you question the govt. own a gun, or are a veteran, YOU ARE A TERRORIST, says the govt. After 9/11 and the “Patriot Act” came the push for “global warming” or as now sugar coated, “climate change”, another ploy to tax the people basically for our very existence (which the global elitists are hell bent on an 80% reduction in the world’s population). Then we have “Obamacare”, quite an oxymoron. That will be the final takeover by the New World Order. The govt. will have TOTAL CONTROL over EVERY US CITIZEN’S LIFE! The German people put their trust in Hitler and that turned out “so well”!
November 29th, 2009 at 10:01 pm
911 was an inside job.
http://www.ae911truth.org
Malecon Reply:
December 3rd, 2009 at 5:18 pm
Yep. That says it all.
From
Signed up Engineer
ae911truth.org
November 29th, 2009 at 10:09 pm
The following “facts” are beyond dispute:
Babies in the womb are not really human and it is OK to butcher them
Nothing created everything and evolution is a siuntifick fakt
God created people to have a natural desire to commit despicable acts with one another that he stated would lead to their destruction and to the destruction of their nations
Terrorists brought down those buildings in NY and caused three buildings to fall perfectly within their own footprint by using only two planes
Malecon Reply:
December 3rd, 2009 at 5:19 pm
Could you elaborate?
liverite Reply:
December 3rd, 2009 at 5:35 pm
Sarcasm – I was pointing out 4 absurdities that are idiotic to accept as fact. It is my belief that the acceptance of evolution as “science” has been the key that allowed unlimited deception. For example, if nothing can create everything and a 1 in trillions chance can lead to life on earth, then certainly the 3 buildings can fall perfectly within their own footprint from only 2 airplanes hitting them and certainly those cave-dwelling, demon-worshipping bad guys could have hijacked those planes and performed all of the impossibilities associated with flying them into the buildings.
Malecon Reply:
December 3rd, 2009 at 7:02 pm
Thanks. But try and avoid sarcasm. People have to know who you are for you to offer sarcasm, and to have it correctly interpreted. It doesn’t really work on a global blog.
Same advisory goes to everyone on this board.
Have a good day.
November 29th, 2009 at 10:24 pm
In pt2 Popular Mechanics stooge says that they weren’t prepared or trained for hijacked planes inside the US… I thought they were actually training that morning for that very scenario – wasn’t that an offical story? Now this ass tries to sell more BS and the reporter, clearly uninformed, doesn’t question it. Pathetic.
Malecon Reply:
December 3rd, 2009 at 5:22 pm
Dunno where the hell they dragged this asshole Meggs from (Zionist/CIA/Mossad?) Probably because nobody with two brain cells to put together wants to be bothered with it.
November 29th, 2009 at 10:31 pm
Bin Laden was a CIA asset from 1979 to 1989, when he went under the codename of “Tim Osmond.” He is said to have been working for the CIA right up until 911 and he did deny having anything to do with 9-11.
November 29th, 2009 at 10:31 pm
If Osama bin laden could pull off 9/11 from a cave in Afghanistan , then I think our own military industrial complex could have done it. And the motive is there- we have an external but unseen enemy that we must fight in an endless war, anywhere anytime, with anybody. An endless war on terror. Thus making 9/11 the ultimate false flag
November 29th, 2009 at 10:39 pm
I don’t understand what fantastic credentials an editor of Popular Mechanics Magazine or news reporter has that should over ride the skepticism of practicing engineers, physicists, firemen and other workers on the scene, professional pilots familiar with air operations of large aircraft, and military professionals. If people buy into that they are more gullible than I would like to think. Most people with any knowledge of basic physics will be skeptical when they take the time to think about what happened.
Chris ~ Reply:
November 30th, 2009 at 6:45 am
Of course they picked Popular Mechanics magazine to do the reasearch on the 9/11 attacks. Popular Mechanics is a CIA front.
‘Popular Mechanics’ is published by the Hearst Corporation, proprietor (chairman of the board) George R. Hearst, grandson of William Randolph Hearst. The president and CEO of Hearst Corporation is one Victor F. Ganzi, since June 1st, 2002. Mr Ganzi is also an officer/director of the Hearst Foundation. Victor F. Ganzi is on the board of directors of The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse at Columbia University (CASA), alongside Columba Bush, wife of Jeb Bush, Governor of Florida, brother of George W. Bush, President of the USA and son of George H.W. Bush, former DG of the CIA.
Victor F. Ganzi is a member of B.E.N.S. – “Business Executives for National Security”. When it came time to evaluate In-Q-Tel, the CIA’s innovative technology development enterprise, Congress turned to BENS. In October 2002, B.E.N.S. received a “CIA Agency Seal Medallion” for its work on the In-Q-Tel program. A look at the names involved in In-Q-Tel quickly reveals it as a front for Zionism Central.
So, we should all be most grateful to ‘Popular Mechanics’ and its new editor James Meigs for indirectly telling us who the real perpetrators of 9/11 were by its rather long-winded “blind ‘em with science” attempt to suppress the truth on behalf of those perpetrators.
Malecon Reply:
December 3rd, 2009 at 5:26 pm
True and very well stated. Thank you.
November 29th, 2009 at 10:45 pm
Did that CBC guy say the 9/11 commission was an INDEPENDENT BODY?
HA HA, one of the biggest pieces of fiction in the whole video.
November 29th, 2009 at 10:45 pm
It is so easy to leave out or whitewash the facts when presenting a piece like this. What I’ve noticed in every one of them is that if there is any element of deliberate leaning toward one side or the other of the issue, it will ALWAYS be manifested, no matter how subtle it may be. We all have our bs detectors. Some just refuse to use them. So, ultimately it is the consciences of the people responsible for releasing garbage like this piece into the public’s view, that will be seared, as the book says, “with a hot iron”. No one EVER gets away with anything, and good people will always make sure they keep the ears of their souls tuned to hear the truth.
November 29th, 2009 at 10:52 pm
They pro-government story drone totally contradicts himself.
He says that it would take hundreds of thousands of tons of explosives to take down the towers, yet insists that it fell naturally without any… So why does he say tons of explosives would be necessary, when its so called ‘natural’ for them to fall with out any?
Why didn’t the interviewer catch on to that?
TheGhost Reply:
November 29th, 2009 at 11:08 pm
cuz hes stupid..
sucker4lush Reply:
November 30th, 2009 at 8:33 am
Seriously! What do they teach them in Journalism school!?
BTW, he said hundreds of tons of thermite…
crazycanuck Reply:
December 4th, 2009 at 11:45 pm
BTW that was the demo-man Brent Blanchard who said that one hundred tonnes of thermite would be needed to bring down the WTCs, not the reporter Bob McKeon. Blanchard then goes on another ramble and says inadvertently in vid4/5 at 8 minute somewhere, THAT IS HOW THEY BROUGHT DOWN THE BUILDING’. This makes me suspicious that Brent Blanchard knows a lot more about why the towers fell than what he will admit publicly.
November 30th, 2009 at 12:52 am
This CBC host used loaded words to defend the official government story. Using words like “raging” when describing fires in WTC7 is an example. As far as people who may or may not be aware of the event, this is speculation. A small team may have had intimate knowledge of the event and as the event unfolded, more and more compartmentalized groups would only receive the information they were told. How many people were actually in charge of direct communications or direct staging in the event? How would Jim Miegs know anything about this? Is he a government employee or a magazine editor. If he’s getting information that we can’t, why is he getting special treatment? Why is Jim Miegs on every 9/11 documentary with information that wasn’t even available in the 9/11 commission report and where is Miegs getting this new info?
November 30th, 2009 at 1:01 am
I hope Jesse Ventura TRULY tries to expose all the facts.
.
.
And hopefully is PISSED OFF and takes it personal when and IF he does so.
November 30th, 2009 at 4:36 am
Thank You Alex Jones for putting this up!
November 30th, 2009 at 5:17 am
don’t forget about the “art students”…
November 30th, 2009 at 9:06 am
The reason the criminals that actually carried out 911 did not simply plant explosives inside the towers to blow them up to blame on terrorist and not use air planes is that’s the reason that there is so much suspicion to begin with; how could they have planted them in such a highly secure place as the world towers unless there was inside help. hence the false flag using planes, the planes were the smoke screen they used to blame someone else, the the money made from the insurance policies was the motive of owner involvement. follow the money. maybe silverstein should be investigated and anyone he paid large amounts of cash to after receiving his booty.
jerseygirl Reply:
December 2nd, 2009 at 11:39 am
There was “work” going on inside of the towers 2 weeks prior to the attack. Workmen? Hmmm. Why was the debris from the towers shipped off to Europe within just days? Why did Larry Silverstein take out a huge insurance policy on bldg. 7, which housed CIA records just 2 weeks prior to the “attack”? I also find it truly “a miracle” that Mohammed Atta’s passport was found intact amongst all of the debris from the towers. His travel bag was also left at the airport in Boston. Why would someone who was knowingly going to die on a plane need to pack a travel bag?
November 30th, 2009 at 9:14 am
They forgot to mention that no one was fired, demoted, jailed, reprimanded or in any way punished for the so called blunder of 911. hence the reason for silence, promotion, raises, job security and no jail time. Why is it so impossible to believe that our lying politicians would cover this up to keep their jobs, and why is it so impossible to believe that the teleprompt readers they call news reporters aren’t just repeating what they are told to repeat for sake of job security and financial gain?
November 30th, 2009 at 9:39 am
ITS ALL INVISIBLE – please stop hosting the vids on Youtube, very many people can’t view them.
Thanks
November 30th, 2009 at 10:28 am
yet nothin was mentioned about the WTC having no power at times during the 2 weeks before 9/11
November 30th, 2009 at 10:34 am
I do not think there is enough evidence that remote control planes were used and that the calls made from family members were hoaxed. I think that is more far fetched and that prof Kee Dewdney looks ridiculous saying so.
I think the people on the planes were pawns used in a tragic covert operation that didn’t care whether there were bystanders and it was used it for the convenience and to further their agenda – they needed casualities.
I’m not sure why it is makes more sense to believe that the towers were hit by remote control planes (two planes that went in at completely different angles – that’s bad remoting there), an operation that went to the trouble of using commercial airplanes with passengers but then those passengers secretely get off then get back on a plane that was eventually shot down over Penn, while the commercial planes are dumped in the ocean. And gee – if those calls from Betty Ong and others were strategically faked…Come on! This is why most in the truth movement looks bad…the story is so far fetched and instead of keeping with the legit facts they went over board with the “conspiracy” parts which makes the real “TRUTHERS” look bad.
The US govt isn’t that smart which is why we didn’t buy their story in the first place. Look, they used Islamic radicals to do their dirty work. They let them come into this country and worked with them to allow the hijacking to happen. It’s that simple. Sorry folks but Islamic radicals do exist and do want to take down the infidels and it’s exactly what the corrupt gov’t needed to work with to get their dirty work done. They allowed them to board those planes and do what they did, they knew it was going to happen and they had a shoe-in for war in the East. The military may or may not have shot down 93 and there are a few other loose ends but in a nut shell those towers were rigged before hand and islamic terrorists were used to do the rest of the dirty work.
The End.
Malecon Reply:
December 3rd, 2009 at 5:32 pm
Your logic is difficult to follow. Could you try again in lesser words? Leaving out the emotive terminology would help. Advice: Just work with the facts.
November 30th, 2009 at 11:13 am
This is a hit piece, pure and simple. It makes me sick to see this type of journalism. If they put a fraction of this effort into real investigative journalism then this would already be solved but no, just another strawman deal, poorly done with dumbed down “expert” eyewitnesses and cherry picked edits. MSM is MSM. It’s all about money. Give us our new investigation already. Screw this actor who thinks he is a journalist.
Malecon Reply:
December 3rd, 2009 at 7:05 pm
Tend to agree with you.
November 30th, 2009 at 12:18 pm
Being “official”; an interesting read.
http://members.iimetro.com.au/.....eology.htm
November 30th, 2009 at 12:20 pm
http://translate.googleusercon.....nwRjbIX-Aw
Fleur de lys Reply:
November 30th, 2009 at 12:28 pm
I found many strange files on the ECD site…like Monsanto + metallurgy?????
http://www.osti.gov/energycita.....id=6460924
chemtrailzombie Reply:
November 30th, 2009 at 4:15 pm
the dots connect .
November 30th, 2009 at 12:28 pm
November 20, 2009
Architect Richard Gage appeared on Australian Radio WSFM’s Jonesy and Amada in the Morning and explained why he (and 950+ licensed Architects and Engineers) want a more THOROUGH investigation in the 9-11 World Trade Centre attacks.
http://edwardrynearson.wordpre.....own-under/
Malecon Reply:
December 3rd, 2009 at 5:36 pm
Yep. And yer know what, – it looks like we are going to get it! It’s like pulling teeth with no anesthetic.
Signed,
Engineer, ae911truth.org
November 30th, 2009 at 12:44 pm
Nano-sized covalant silver hydrosols for those Europeans left out. See Bionaid at http://www.bionaid.eu, tri-oxysilver solution, covalant bond, superior to colloidal silver products. Also available Zeoheal, advanced zeolite de-tox formula.Thx
November 30th, 2009 at 4:05 pm
the elite nwo criminals have not much longer before they are busted for 911 !
November 30th, 2009 at 4:13 pm
They interviewed a man who said he saw a missile hit the pentagon not a plane,of corse they just show this once or twice. Main stream cover-up. Its funny how they put a big tarp over the hole in the building ,it was to small to be made from a jet.
Malecon Reply:
December 3rd, 2009 at 5:38 pm
Right on. Thanks.
November 30th, 2009 at 4:22 pm
Not to change the subject ….. this is crazy and must be reviewed !!! wow.!! we have been decieved once more….!!!
Hello everyone, BOY!! do we have something for you all……..READY? ARE YOU READY !!!!!!?????
What if we told you to re-watch the dvd of LOOSE CHANGE….. because……
In the beginning watch in slow motion the plane hitting the 2nd tower half way thru what we have we all seen, the tower absorbs the plane and disappears and then an explosion, remember aluminum hitting steel!!! I remember a guy that kept coming on this site and saying “No planes hit the Towers” and of course it annoyed everyone, right? well do your own research, we know that no planes hit the pentagon and no plane went down in Shanksville, people, watch any video you have hitting the towers, their are only two that we have seen and know of. We have totally changed our view as what happened that day. Remember, you don’t see anything falling from tower when supposed plane hits tower. NO DEBRIS…Stop your video in slow motion when plane is halfway thru tower and tell me what you see, don’t believe, do you own research. who is Morgan Reynolds. Phd.?? remember watch in slow motion… the building ” ABSORBS” the plane 1st. than an explosion…
RJB Reply:
December 2nd, 2009 at 7:02 am
Wrong.
Plenty of airplane debris DID exit the building and land a few blocks away, including one engine that was identified as having come from a Boeing737, not a 757, or 767, as was alleged to have hit the towers. This means it probably came from an, older military surplus plane painted up to look like a newer passenger plane, probably outfitted with advanced remote control.
Why go to all the trouble and expense of blowing up a building and making it APPEAR that a passenger jet hit it, when it is so comparatively easy to use the real thing, even a similar military substitute that the casual observer could not differentiate, and not risk having the illusion exposed as that.
Explosives and incendiaries were both planted in the buildings, and planes DID hit the buildings, just not hijacked commercial passenger planes. They were not hijacked. They were not commercial planes. But they were military surplus planes, pulled out of inventory parked in Florida and destined for Israel as part of our yearly military aid package.
The reason no passenger or similar size plane hit the Pentagon is because the planners determined it could not physically be reliably accomplished in a jumbo jet, so in that case, they had no choice but to create the illusion, which they did using another painted up military version 737, and a cruise missile. The cruise missile was target coordinated to hit the pentagon just as the jet flew a couple of hundred feet OVER the building, and out to sea, where, once over the horizon and out of view from land, a matter of seconds at that speed, it was crashed, shot down, or remotely destructed, as part of a classified naval exercise, and the black boxes recovered, which they later claimed were found in the Pentagon.
wildinfo Reply:
December 3rd, 2009 at 12:52 pm
you seen bomb debris …. Like I said go back WATCH your “In Plane Site” or “Loose Change”
dvd’s in SLOW MOTION… have an open mind… don’t let the paid media tell you what you seen or heard… Yes there was bombs… but what else..?
You can clearly see in slow motion the plane is 3/4 in … and no broken tower windows on the way in?? ever see a plane on the runway hit a barrier in slow motion, see how much damage the alum. plane has?? this hit a reinforced steel tower, WATCH THE VIDEOS AGAIN….
if you were in a car and hit a tree …. who wins?? THE TREE….Keep an open mind..
Malecon Reply:
December 3rd, 2009 at 5:41 pm
An EXCELLENT summary of events. Dead-on as they say. That’s what happened. Thank you.
November 30th, 2009 at 5:30 pm
I wonder what that implosion / demolitions family by the name of ” Loiseaux ” ( remember them ? ) has to say about the WTC angle-cut columns vis-a-vis thermate steel demolitions !!!
HMMMMMMMMM.
December 2nd, 2009 at 7:52 am
Can anyone logically and rationally say that it would be better for us to wait until it is too late to violently defend ourselves from this violence, treason, and tyranny, than to do so sooner than some might think prudent?
The risk of waiting too long to violently act in our own self defense is to our own demise. What is the risk of acting too soon? Is it even possible to act too soon, given what we already know, under the circumstances?
That said, would not our enemies, doing as they have already, also put in place those who might pose as our friends and allies, while continually encouraging us NOT to act, saying “not yet, its it too soon, too soon” until it is too late? What rewards would await such traitors for accomplishing that task?
If our enemies would conceivably do such a thing, then they probably already have. That makes anyone who would continue to suggest, even at this late hour, that we continue to “stand down” suspect. Are you looking for those shills, who continue to tell you not to act in your own best interest, until it is too late to do you any good if you did?
You know they are “out there”. Can you name one?
To its everlasting shame, the American military was made to “stand down” on 9-11. WHO is now making the American people “stand down”, as the process of their final acts of conquest over and enslavement of us is being completed?
When the jackbooted thugs are breaking your door down, it is much too late. The police state has been put in place. You should have started resisting long ago, that no squads of jackbooted thugs in government uniforms would dare think to come to your door.
Matt Reply:
December 2nd, 2009 at 2:48 pm
STFU U CIA POS
December 2nd, 2009 at 10:05 pm
look at IN plane Site very slowly….. S L O W- M O look at how the plane is almost all the way in and LOOK no broken windows yet?? the alum. plane hit a steel tower….. ever watch what happens to a plane on a run way that hits a wall or a barrier? IT CRUMBLES debris falls …. If you watch the plane is mostly 3/4 of the way in…. nothing broke, no wings, NO TOWER WINDOWS. no nose parts…. and why go thru the trouble of saying it was a 767 and it wasn’t….
END RESULT…. it don’t matter really how… the creeps are getting away with it..! so many poor people lost love ones in those towers… and these jerks walk around still smiling, golfing, etc. going to their occult worships…..what to get ready to sacrifice more…FATHER HAVE MERCY.!!
any one remember growing up watching the Jetsons? we thought by the year 2000 we would have something like that when we were growing up in the early 70’s…. but its all high tech that the gov has and using it on us…. scalar weapons…halograms…chemtrails, vaccines…GMO frankin-plants, that they don’t even know what its doing to us….. and MONSANTO-KILLERS seed killers. should be ousted..!!
Lil Bastard Reply:
December 3rd, 2009 at 11:05 am
There are two types of no-planers. The first type are the disinfo agents who were set up in the beginning to advance just what you are suggesting: that the aircraft that hit the WTC and Pentagon were remote controlled drones or holographic projections or some ridiculous fantasy. The goal of these agents was to make the entire Truth movement look like fools.
The other type are people who were stupid enough to fall for it and pass themselves off as engineers and physicists as you are doing, wildinfo. You can’t see anything because it crashing into the g-d building at 500 miles per hour! Unfortunately, the networks didn’t set up their HD camera equipment in time to satisfy kooks like you.
9/11 involved four commercial passenger jets. There were hundreds of people on those jets. The deaths of the passengers and airline crew are an unspeakable tragedy. There is no question the government of the United States – and probably Israel and other countries – was complicit. From Norman Minetta’s testimony, we know damn well that Cheney was one of the conspirators. We don’t know what happened on those aircraft. We don’t know who was helping it along on the ground. But make no mistake, those were commercial aircraft with innocent people on board.
People like you, wildinfo, who advance stupid theories about no-planes and robots, etc are a major distraction for those of us trying to bring the criminals to justice. Because of our efforts, we have no idea how many false flag operations we have prevented September 11, 2001. So, NO! The creeps are NOT getting away with it.
Dear God, thank you for Alex Jones. Please protect him and his family.
wildinfo Reply:
December 3rd, 2009 at 12:41 pm
to LIL B. I won’t even write out the rest of your so-called- CHRISTIAN name you give yourself . You probably are a good christian like Alex with rock n roll music too right? worship the SUN gods on sunday… day 1… follow the Man made traditions of paganism… right? use titles such as lord… right… Ba’al.. look it up..
stop being closed minded… like I said, go back re-watch 911 In Plane Site or Loose Change in SLOW motion and watch as the plane makes it into the tower with no debris of WINDOWS coming down. I do not make money off of stupid people like Alex, and many others do..
looks like you worship Alex? do you work for him?? GIVE THE GLORY TO WHOM IT
BELONGS>> THE ALMIGHTY CREATOR …. THE GREAT I’AM. I only come on here to wake people up to lies…
Malecon Reply:
December 3rd, 2009 at 5:47 pm
Gentlemen: You both have excellent points to make – not that far apart. Now boys, – be nice to each other. OK? Invective and verbal violence ain’t gonna work in the long term.
December 3rd, 2009 at 12:08 am
CBC reporter’s name is Bob McEwan, he says at end of video that CBC is trying to give both sides of the story but he does ridicule Professor Dudely at one point in vid 4/5.
December 3rd, 2009 at 1:58 am
Made some important statements about vid 4/5 posts deleted, thanks Al
CHIRP, CHIRP, CHIRP I THINK I HEAR A MOCKINGBIRD.
Lil Bastard Reply:
December 3rd, 2009 at 10:47 am
What’s wrong, Johnny? Your spam and off-topic bulls--- not getting through any more? Buy an ad. Alex could use the cash.
crazycanuck Reply:
December 3rd, 2009 at 7:01 pm
So now I have to bribe Al off in order to get my allusions posted, go back to your NWO master and lick his feet.
December 3rd, 2009 at 2:48 am
At lot of these comments are pretty negative. The Fifth Estate presents a program on unanswered questions and most of you crap all over it. You people can have your cake and eat it too.
At least one mainstream media is covering this issue and giving different points of view from people and again people just crap all over it.
Malecon Reply:
December 3rd, 2009 at 6:15 pm
You’re angry, understandably. But put it behind you and try and offer something more constructive. Appreciate your comments.
crazycanuck Reply:
December 3rd, 2009 at 7:06 pm
CBC Newsworld cable channel did another doc. on 911 on a program called Passionate Eye(???) similar to Fifth Estate on Sept.11/2009 it was about the worst piece of cover-up jounalism I have seen. Made 911 truthers look like a bunch of crazies but really didn’t delve into the facts just a bunch of rhetoric really.
December 3rd, 2009 at 12:46 pm
look LiL Bas….. worships alex… and he has a good christian mouth… go back a read the other reply….
do you know who alex is?? do you have an open mind to study and learn… Is that all you do is come on a criticize people??
your nice….
December 3rd, 2009 at 1:49 pm
the theorys of what really happenend are ludacris. i laughed my ass off at the last guy about the govt painting planes to look like american airlines then crashing the real planes in the altantic ocean. The show was more a comedy then documentary by getting big nut jobs on tv. worse documentary ever
wildinfo Reply:
December 3rd, 2009 at 6:21 pm
I agree… paintings… hmmm!! good one savis monk … very funny….
wildinfo Reply:
December 3rd, 2009 at 10:50 pm
that painting idea was RJB… by the way. mr Monk.
December 3rd, 2009 at 7:15 pm
There are many good subscribers to Infowars blogs. Great reading, – for the most part anyway.
But remember that your comments are read worldwide.
Therefore, – your localized (particularly Americans) vernacular – and sarcasms – are not understood by most people outside the USA.
We are gifted with the English language. Use it properly and don’t get pissed off because other people don’t undersatnd your local slang. Not that hard to do.
Fleur de lys Reply:
December 4th, 2009 at 11:50 pm
Gifted with the english language…
Slang you dont understand, may not come from another land…
Kan yun ki di ki lè…y fo ki soi
Laisse le bon temps rouler!!
December 3rd, 2009 at 10:18 pm
Whatever.
December 3rd, 2009 at 10:26 pm
I must apologize for my previous entry…a slip of the finger and before I knew it I had a post. I’m new to this online stuff so please forgive my keyboard prowess.
As for what I was going to say earlier then, whatever the mainstream media says take it with a great deal of salt.
I say this because The Fifth Estate ran a piece called Conspiracy Theories, broadcast on Wednesday, October 29 2003 on CBC-TV. The general tone set by the crew then was one of mild amusement and abject contempt for anyone who even remotely believed 9/11 was anything but a foreign operation.
December 4th, 2009 at 1:42 pm
[url=http://7v135ndil966mfhh.com/]c3jcq16e7bo84k5g[/url]
[link=http://6jxlkp1uigcxroy1.com/]zi83sd117c0og0ci[/link]
l1p7lv2wkv2c4h5g
http://syyklpa01ytgc377.com/
December 4th, 2009 at 3:17 pm
David Ray Griffen should be ashamed of himself. To claim those family members were talking to computer voice simulators is a slap in the face to those who talked to thier loved ones for the very last time. It also makes the Truth Movement look like a bunch of inconsiderate a-holes.
December 4th, 2009 at 7:43 pm
everyone should read TOWERS OF DECEPTION…The best book on 9/11 I have ever read…Anyone reading it will be left in no doubt whatsoever that it was an inside job…Combine this with ZERO-An investigation into 9/11, the most kick ass 9/11 doc ever made and watch their jaws drop……
Building 7, PNAC document, USAF stand down, no footage at pentagon, Barry jennings, hijackers turning up ALIVE(BBC article) BBC reports 7 23 mins early….yaddah yaddah yaddah..INSIDE JOB…..
Burn DVDs…of zero, walk your streets and hand them out, posy them in mail boxes, cover mainstream newspaper blogs, phone newspapers, phone politcians……
DO THIS!!!
Expose it….!!!
Do all that you can..This will come out, sooner or later the info will end up in the right hands…..
Get this mainstream
December 4th, 2009 at 10:20 pm
Thanks for deleting my comments Al, could you go and feed your MOCKINGBIRD, OK. I hear mockingbird makes a good soup base. I am preparing a recipe – MOCKINGBIRD CORDON NOIX anyone? You know what that means don’t you? Heh, Heh, Heh.
Fleur de lys Reply:
December 5th, 2009 at 12:11 am
Filet chateau briand…
Pour les fins connaisseurs, est, le filet cuit dans une pate ou panure.
Par contre je n’ai jamais entendu dire Cordon noix…Nut rope…in slang translation.
Est-vous cordon bleu monsieur?
Fleur de lys Reply:
December 5th, 2009 at 12:12 am
Nuts in a rope…??!
crazycanuck Reply:
December 5th, 2009 at 11:54 pm
i do know of some people who do eat Bull testicles, not sure if I would try it myself.
December 5th, 2009 at 12:45 am
CHANGING THE SUBJECT, SORRY… Here is a site on monsanta: http://www.organicconsumers.org/monlink.cfm
DON’T FORGET TO REBUKE …. OR PROTEST MONSANTO SEEDS !! THE FRANKIN-PLANTS… THEIR ALIVE !!! and we want them dead… they are fake GMO’s killing our Bees… etc and us…
THIS IS JUST A REMINDER, ok… But they want us to forget them… We need to keep up and lock them down…. lets… get them out….. help…. DOWN WITH MONSANTO…
Alex’s crew keeps taking them off….. stop it….whats wrong with truth…. eh?
PLEASE LEAVE THIS UP… ITS ALL OUR HEALTH ON THE LINE…. ABOUT FOOD !!
December 7th, 2009 at 5:44 pm
The ugly truth is that we live under a criminal government. Obama included.
A Democrat.
December 8th, 2009 at 4:38 am
They presented it as true unbiased Journalism. That is rare to find. It is appreciated. It is finally not an OP ED piece in a world where finding something that is not OP ED is increasingly difficult.
December 8th, 2009 at 8:25 pm
they are showing the missile that hit tower 2 on the first video.
December 8th, 2009 at 9:37 pm
and explosions on the roof of tower 1 when the missile hit the building.
December 9th, 2009 at 3:43 am
Dear prison planet members,
Have a look at about 50 seconds into the 1st vid, and you will see video footage of the supposed plane (who knows what it is) hitting the side of the pentagon.
I believe the explosion visible in this video is a clear indicator as to what the payload was on whatever it was that hit the pentagon. Clearly, the footage would be different had a plane full of fuel hit the pentagon.
Please observe the explosion plume and pay attention to the ejection plume, this is key towards identifying the payload of whatever the projectile carried.
Have a look at the world trade center impacts to get an idea as to what the ejection plume looks like with a plane carrying fuel. The plane crumples though the building, rupturing the fuel tanks along the way, creating a vapor cloud of fuel which ignites to produce the initial explosion. This vapor cloud expands and extends along with the explosion and is evidenced by the ballistic explosion along the path of the projectile as WELL as an ejecta explosion around the point of impact.
Now please have a look at the impact on the pentagon. The explosion clear extends upwards. It does not work like the fuel powered ejecta of the world trade center impacts and burns with a much brighter orange. Notice the smoke from the world trade center was black, and the explosion a deep, vibrant orange.
The properties of the pentagon impact are indicative of a solid payload impact, that which would be on a missile. From my own examination of the security footage, the object seems to be more like a missile than a plane, yet it is tough to draw any conclusions from this footage alone without revealing the nature of the explosion.
Examine the impacts of different missiles and I am sure someone can even come up with an ID of the missile. It is likely that the missile is your own country’s, and the explosion and impact, color, speed, and behavior, will match a missile which was already possible to deploy and hit the pentagon with a push of the button from the USA’s own military.
After examination of various readily available footage out there you will see exactly what I mean, that different explosions have their own pattern depending on the explosive used…. the explosive event at the pentagon was clearly not produced by jet fuel.
December 9th, 2009 at 7:28 pm
Good show. Generally pretty fair.
December 11th, 2009 at 12:17 am
CALL OR WRITE “THE HOWARD STERN” AND TELL THEM HOW MUCH YOU ENJOY HEARING JESSE VENTURA TALK ABOUT 911 ON THE SHOW!! SAY YOU WANT TO HEAR MORE ABOUT IT AND REQUEST THAT HOWARD HAVE OTHER GUESTS DISCUSSING 911 AS WELL. HOWARD IS STILL A MAJOR STAR WITH A LARGE FOLLOWING. GETTING HIM ON OUR SIDE(DESPITE WHAT YOU MAY THINK OF HIM PERSONALLY) WOULD BE A MAJOR COUP!!!!!!