- Infowars - http://www.infowars.com -
Eugenic Supreme Rule: Effective Through Incrementalism
Posted By kurtnimmoadmin On August 13, 2012 @ 8:06 am In Featured Stories,Old Infowars Posts Style,Tile | Comments Disabled
August 13, 2012
Aaron Dykes discussing the following article on Infowars Nightly News:
In a series of lectures (UNESCO has killed the link since I published my original article on Infowars.com in february 2012) on the subject of eugenics organized by UNESCO’s Science and Ethics Commission, researcher Gwen Terrenoire elaborates on the practice and philosophy of eugenics in France before 1945 (editor’s note: thanks to ProudTruther.Com the file has been secured. Thank God for the alternative media!) In the course of the lecture, Terrenoire touches on the desire of many eugenicists to create a scientific dictatorship needed to orderly carry out eugenics. To clarify her main thesis, she channels top-eugenicist and pioneer researcher at the Rockefeller Institute of Medical Research Alexis Carrel:
“Carrel expresses more clearly than other eugenicists the dream of a State governed by eugenics, what Muchielli calls a biocratic utopia, where public policy is inspired by the scientific elite, with medicine prevailing over all other disciplines. He believed that his scientific approach would enable social and moral problems to be solved, and with this aim he recommended not only measures relating to hygiene and the protection of childhood but also the elimination, occasionally directly by euthanasia, more often indirectly by the sterilization of thousands of individuals judged to be dangerous for the future of the human race and an obstacle to the success of socalled biologically superior people.”
Terrenoire’s invoking of the biocratic idea to create a “superior” class of men in a speech prepared for UNESCO is ironic. The temple she preached within is dedicated to the same biocratic deity she decries in her speech. By on the one hand describing the selective breeding of man, and on the other the extermination of the “inferior”- she adequately encapsulates the reasoning behind this biocratic ideal.
The biocratic thought is simply this: in order to achieve total control over the body and the mind, both components must be made dependent on a specific cure for a specific ill. A feigned ill is usually preferred, as it can be made to go this or that way just as they see fit. By presenting themselves as well-doers, the biocrats raise the perfect guise behind which they can exercise eugenic power in full impunity. They regard their work as a great work, a sacred exercise. Like the human offerings of old, this too is performed as a sacrifice to be laid at the feet of some dark deity.
True culture-changes, the biocrats know, are not spontaneous- nor are they the children of sudden revolutionary acts. It is by the hand of gradual variations, the tiniest adjustments, that humanity is led towards the biocratic society.
In a shocking little booklet (click for PDF) titled “Ancient Eugenics” written in 1913 by “late scholar” Allen G. Roper, this incrementalism is further elaborated upon. The way to build this future eugenic state, Roper argues, is not by an open decree or oppressive measures. For the trick to work, it must be a thing of the long haul.
“(…) compulsion”, writes Roper, “or guidance, however veiled, is foredoomed to failure in the case of an institution which can only rest on inclination or an innate sense of duty. Moreover, “custom is lord of all,” and custom can only be modified gradually and in the course of centuries”
“Modern Eugenists”, the author goes on to say, “have recognized that, if there is to be Eugenics by Act of Parliament, the Eugenic ideal must first be absorbed into the conscience of the nation.”
The author, a fierce proponent of eugenics himself, also shows us a glimpse into the mind of the biocratic utopians: those who believe themselves to be equal to God and therefore permit themselves the leisure of deciding who lives and who dies.
The author traces the idea of exterminating the weak in favor of the strong’s survival back to the ancients. Roper does not, as you would expect, limit his search to the ancient Greeks. He descents even further into the past until he reaches the very beginnings of man.
“The preface to a history of Eugenics may be compiled from barbarism, for the first Eugenist was not the Spartan legislator, but the primitive savage who killed his sickly child.”
“While they (the “savages”, as Roper tends to describe early man) lived their short lives, the weakly, the deformed, and the superfluous were a burden to the tribe. Human law, superseding natural law, strove to eliminate them at birth. This was the atavistic basis on which subsequent Eugenics was built.”
Infanticide as a means to preserve the tribe. Roper states outright that eugenics flows from the killing of babies. Any lapse in this human endeavor will be compensated by nature, Roper says echoing the Malthusian principle:
“Nature, forging additional weapons, hastens the elimination of the unfit by disease.”
But the author makes clear that:
“Modern Eugenics is based on Evolution not a passive form, but one that concedes some latitude to the guiding action of the human will.”
“While infanticide is everywhere disappearing”, Roper writes, “there remain still the principles simultaneously developed. Three centuries ago Eugenics was the Utopian dream of an imprisoned monk. A century later Steele, more in jest than in earnest, suggested that one might wear any passion out of a family by culture, as skilful gardeners blot a colour out of a tulip that hurts its beauty. But neither science nor public opinion was ready to respond. It was not till late in the nineteenth century that the crude human breeding of the Spartans, in altered form and in new conditions, became the scientific stirpiculture of Galton.”
There it is. Eugenics existed for countless millenniums. Now, in the last fifty years or so, the mainstream media will make you believe eugenics does not exist- or that perhaps it once existed, but is now banned from civilized society (whatever that means). It’s a conspiracy theory, they claim. To understand where the eugenics movement of the early 20st century- and by extension the Rockefeller-funded environmental movement of today, draw their inspiration from, the following quote must be read in its entirety:
“The Ancients attempted to combat the wasteful processes of Nature by eliminating the non-viable at birth; our efforts, on the contrary, have been directed to the prolongation of their lives. Instead of sacrificing the unfit in the interests of the fit, we have employed every resource of modern science “to keep alight the feeble flame of life in the baseborn child of a degenerate parent.”” (…) “There is the female infanticide of China and the Isles of the Southern Pacific, the male infanticide of the Abipones of Paraguay, and the indiscriminate massacre of the Gagas, who, killing every child alike, steal from a neighbouring tribe. There are the Indians who offer up children to Moloch or drown them in the Ganges; the Carthaginians sacrifice them to Kronos, the Mexicans to the rain god. There is the murder of twins and albinos in Arebo, and the cannibalism of the Aborigines. In Mingrelia, ” when they have not the wherewithal to maintain them, they hold it a piece of charity to murder infants new born.” There are the Biluchi, who kill all their natural children, and there is the modern factor of shame. Co-existing with all these various practices there is the definitely Eugenic motive. Among the Aborigines, all deformed children are killed as soon as born. The savages of Guiana kill any child that is “deformed, feeble, or bothersome.” The Fans kill all sickly children. In Central America “it is suspected that infant murder is responsible for the rarity of the deformed.” In Tonquin we hear of a law which forbids the exposing or strangling of children, be they ever so deformed. In Japan, deformed children were killed or reared according to the father’s pleasure. Among the Prussians the aged and infirm, the sick and deformed, were unhesitatingly put to death.”
“Unhesitatingly put to death”, thus ends the quote. The biocrats who pull the strings within the scientific dictatorship are very much aware of the origins of their belief-system, firmly rooted in the ancient practice of infanticide. Roper continues to say modern eugenicists have refined the ancient practices of primitive man to the degree that in modern times the state is the deciding factor. Roper:
“Limitation of numbers, though it does not itself constitute “aggeneration” of the race, improves to a considerable degree the individuals of which the race is constituted. When the undesired children are out of the way, more attention can be paid to the desired. The savage bred recklessly, compensating his recklessness by infanticide, but a natural law of civilization has superseded the artificial law of primitive man. Control of reproduction, and resulting from it a falling birth-rate and a diminished death-rate, is a tendency which, first showing itself in Imperial Rome, is conspicuous today in every civilized community.”
Roper also mentions the obsession of the biocrats, including Plato, with numbers:
“Obsessed by the idea of the mean and a mystic doctrine of numbers, he (Plato) would fix the number of the state at an unalterable 8,000. To attain this static equilibrium the guardians are to regulate the number of marriages.”
The idea that numbers have a mystical dimension is prevalent amongst biocrats. The before-mentioned statement is also reminiscent of the Georgia Guidestones, which reads:
“Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.”
“(…) there is”, Roper continues, “the question of the numbers of the population. It is no definitely Eugenic conception that leads to the limitation of 5,040: there is a certain Malthusian element, and something of a prepossession with a mystical doctrine of numbers.”
Although Roper invokes the Platonic way of conducting eugenics- quick and openly- he states that to the modern eugenicist “the chronic pauper is the victim of the germ-plasm- heredity.”
“With increased knowledge to justify restrictions”, Roper explains, “the modern state may be purged of the pauper more slowly, but no less surely, than the Platonic state of the Laws.”
Since 1913 two World Wars have raged over the earth, leaving a pile of dead in their wake. Eugenics became a thing of the state. In Nazi-Germany, eugenics was the norm, in Europe and the United States it became a more or less covert enterprise. Finally, the United Nations was constructed to make sure that the ancient Eugenic ideal would be preserved and passed on into the 21st century on a global scale.
Since the UN is acting as prime coordinating body of this “Eugenic ideal”, the attacks that mankind has come to suffer under are twofold. On the one hand we see an attack on the psyche- both the individual psyche and the collective or “hive”-psyche. One of the results of this systematic campaign is the general acceptance of abortion as a reasonable option when confronted with an unwanted pregnancy. In the not too distant past the very notion of terminating the unborn would have outraged even the most “progressive” of minds. Now we even see those who call themselves conservative readily entertaining the notion that it’s ok to terminate the living.
On the other hand we have an outright assault aimed against the human body, specifically targeting the immune system for soft-kill purposes. The elite must reason along the following line: when both the human body and the human mind are under our control, the path has been cleared for selective termination of mankind. When grand vaccination schemes (which differ among different ethnic groups) have been methodically coordinated- the herd may be immune to some innocent flu, they are all the more susceptible to the next airborne ebola-like outbreak.
In closing: the ultimate assault on mankind is chiefly biocratic in origin; eugenicists throughout the last centuries have been pioneers in the field of bio-genetic research, promoting draconian population policies under the name of “global health”. The principle of Hegelian dialectic is being applied all over the board. Problem: the creation of viral and non-viral disease; reaction: people demanding their vaccines; solution: the unthinkable.
Every time we read about another biocrat stating that the planet should be liberated from “excess humans”, even if he calls himself an environmentalist, some obscure manuscript in a long-forgotten library rattles with glee. The eugenic idea does not originate with some sadist in a United Nations office building. It is a practice, rather, that has been tried and tested by many civilizations and tribes in earth’s history- and now perfected at the hands of a scientific elite hellbent on seizing the human body, constricting the human mind, and by doing so, subdue all of mankind.
Jurriaan Maessen’s post first appeared on his blog, Explosivereports.com.
Article printed from Infowars: http://www.infowars.com
URL to article: http://www.infowars.com/eugenic-supreme-rule-effective-through-incrementalism/
Copyright © 2013 Infowars. All rights reserved.