Female Justices Object to Unsigned Supreme Court Order Favoring Christian College’s Objection to Birth Control Compromise

Justices Sotomayor, Ginsburg and Kagan clearly took exception
Female Justices Object to Unsigned Supreme Court Order Favoring Christian College’s Objection to Birth Control Compromise

Image Credits: ensh, Flickr

by Noel Brinkerhoff, Steve Straehley | AllGov | July 7, 2014


Only days after issuing the controversial Hobby Lobby ruling that exempted some businesses from providing certain types of birth control in its insurance plans, the U.S. Supreme Court produced an unsigned opinion supporting a Christian college’s right to ignore other provisions of the Affordable Care Act dealing with birth control.

Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Elena Kagan clearly took exception to the court’s decision by male justices to issue an injunction at least temporarily exempting Wheaton College in Illinois from having to follow Obamacare regulations mandating that employers with a religious objection to providing birth control submit a form declaring that objection. When forms are submitted, third parties are then authorized to provide birth control to the insured.

The court endorsed Wheaton’s refusal to use mandatory forms for the transfer on the grounds that they led indirectly to the use of birth control. Like some other Christian institutions, the college objects to providing, directly or indirectly, intrauterine devices and morning-after pills on grounds that they amount to forms of abortion, an opinion at odds with medical practice.

Sotomayor wrote in response to the opinion that the court had undermined its own ruling in the Hobby Lobby case, which upheld the use of the forms. “Those who are bound by our decisions usually believe they can take us at our word,” she said. “Not so today.”

Sotomayor added that the opinion “undermines confidence in this institution,” and that it could be used by other nonprofit religious organizations that share Wheaton’s concerns.

“The issuance of an injunction in this case will presumably entitle hundreds or thousands of other objectors to the same remedy,” she said.

Read more


Infowars.com Videos:


Comments are closed.