
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Global Cooling: Alaskan Glaciers Grow For First Time In 250 Years</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.infowars.com/global-cooling-alaskan-glaciers-grow-for-first-time-in-250-years/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.infowars.com/global-cooling-alaskan-glaciers-grow-for-first-time-in-250-years/</link>
	<description>Because there's a war on for your mind.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:26:03 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Christina</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/global-cooling-alaskan-glaciers-grow-for-first-time-in-250-years/comment-page-3/#comment-590091</link>
		<dc:creator>Christina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 15:23:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=5364#comment-590091</guid>
		<description>Post 105 I would have to disagree with you there; I dont believe in global warming and I dont even drive.

There is absolutely no evidence for global warming as what is being pushed by the media exept that the earth does appear to go through natural stages of warming and cooling. 

Global cooling happened for a few decades in the 15 -1600&#039;s the &quot;Little Ice Age&quot;. It also happened in the early 1800s with one year (1816) where it snowed well into summer and people started calling it Eighteen Hundred and Froze to Death.

Not caused by pollution but by earth&#039;s natural cycles.

Is anyone here old enough to remember the &quot;global cooling&quot; media scare in the &#039;70&#039;s? Because the global average temperature had dropped a fraction of a degree since about 1940. And everyone was getting so hopped up about a coming ice age.

Well they are doing it again with global warming. With just as little evidence to back them up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Post 105 I would have to disagree with you there; I dont believe in global warming and I dont even drive.</p>
<p>There is absolutely no evidence for global warming as what is being pushed by the media exept that the earth does appear to go through natural stages of warming and cooling. </p>
<p>Global cooling happened for a few decades in the 15 -1600&#8217;s the &#8220;Little Ice Age&#8221;. It also happened in the early 1800s with one year (1816) where it snowed well into summer and people started calling it Eighteen Hundred and Froze to Death.</p>
<p>Not caused by pollution but by earth&#8217;s natural cycles.</p>
<p>Is anyone here old enough to remember the &#8220;global cooling&#8221; media scare in the &#8217;70&#8217;s? Because the global average temperature had dropped a fraction of a degree since about 1940. And everyone was getting so hopped up about a coming ice age.</p>
<p>Well they are doing it again with global warming. With just as little evidence to back them up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Losers</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/global-cooling-alaskan-glaciers-grow-for-first-time-in-250-years/comment-page-3/#comment-589429</link>
		<dc:creator>Losers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 22:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=5364#comment-589429</guid>
		<description>People who believe the earth is not warming believe only for 1 reason.

They love their SUV&#039;s and their Fossil Fuel Power Plants..

What a bunch of losers!!!   I don&#039;t care the price of gas is high because I ride a bike. 
We don&#039;t need more technology, we need a lot less!

What a bunch of losers you all are</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People who believe the earth is not warming believe only for 1 reason.</p>
<p>They love their SUV&#8217;s and their Fossil Fuel Power Plants..</p>
<p>What a bunch of losers!!!   I don&#8217;t care the price of gas is high because I ride a bike.<br />
We don&#8217;t need more technology, we need a lot less!</p>
<p>What a bunch of losers you all are</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Letsbereal</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/global-cooling-alaskan-glaciers-grow-for-first-time-in-250-years/comment-page-3/#comment-589276</link>
		<dc:creator>Letsbereal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 20:34:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=5364#comment-589276</guid>
		<description>Al Gore is a phony hubris smug!

#54 Prove? Lookat at info point #54</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Al Gore is a phony hubris smug!</p>
<p>#54 Prove? Lookat at info point #54</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kim</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/global-cooling-alaskan-glaciers-grow-for-first-time-in-250-years/comment-page-3/#comment-589039</link>
		<dc:creator>Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 16:40:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=5364#comment-589039</guid>
		<description>Maybe the ice will grow so large there will be a new ice age? Like the story in BF: 2142?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe the ice will grow so large there will be a new ice age? Like the story in BF: 2142?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin L</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/global-cooling-alaskan-glaciers-grow-for-first-time-in-250-years/comment-page-2/#comment-588936</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin L</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 13:33:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=5364#comment-588936</guid>
		<description>This video has conclusive evidence that man made C02 emissions is not the cause of global warming. 
http://www.surfthechannel.com/info/documentaries/The_Great_Global_Warming_Swindle/74784/S0E0.html?aid=84815</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This video has conclusive evidence that man made C02 emissions is not the cause of global warming.<br />
<a href="http://www.surfthechannel.com/info/documentaries/The_Great_Global_Warming_Swindle/74784/S0E0.html?aid=84815" rel="nofollow">http://www.surfthechannel.com/.....?aid=84815</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Cunnington</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/global-cooling-alaskan-glaciers-grow-for-first-time-in-250-years/comment-page-2/#comment-588914</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Cunnington</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 11:59:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=5364#comment-588914</guid>
		<description>Check out Al Gore&#039;s ice core graphs in his inconvenient truth. It is clearly a propaganda attempt to mislead. The charts of ice and co2 are depicted next to each other. If you  transpose the two charts it becomes obvious that the rise in co2 is an effect of a warmer earth period.

The co2 increases after the ice retreats (by about 800 years point to point chronlogically).

Therefore the Al Gore version is an attempt to mislead and reverse the evidence.

Try to bear in mind that just in Alaska there are currently two active volcanos emitting more green house gas then the entire global arbon footprint. You also have millions of tons of methane (25 times more potent than co2 as a green house gas) which is entering the atmosphere from frozen tundra across millions of square kilometres. This is CAUSED by the warming effect of the sun.

150 years ago the river Thames in London regularly froze over in winter and large Christmas fairs were held on the frozen river. How many time has it frozen over in the last 100 years?

Greenland was colonised by Danish vikings in the 1200s and archilogical finds clearly show that crops similar to those currently grown in northern Europe were cultivated there seasonally clearly showing that the temprature must have been at leas 5-7 centrigrade above current levels 800 years ago.

Isn&#039;t it a little strange that this warming occurred without any human activity input (if you rule out cooking fires) and that vast swathes of the world DIDN&#039;T become uninhabitable or sea levels rising to castasprophic levels).

The entire thrust of the global warming scam is to create a tax revenue to fund a one world government. They picked this one because they can blame the population in general. This is typical for the NWO cabal who also preach that inflation is caused by excessive wage claims for workers driving up costs when it is caused deliberately to transfer wealth by thier private banks!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out Al Gore&#8217;s ice core graphs in his inconvenient truth. It is clearly a propaganda attempt to mislead. The charts of ice and co2 are depicted next to each other. If you  transpose the two charts it becomes obvious that the rise in co2 is an effect of a warmer earth period.</p>
<p>The co2 increases after the ice retreats (by about 800 years point to point chronlogically).</p>
<p>Therefore the Al Gore version is an attempt to mislead and reverse the evidence.</p>
<p>Try to bear in mind that just in Alaska there are currently two active volcanos emitting more green house gas then the entire global arbon footprint. You also have millions of tons of methane (25 times more potent than co2 as a green house gas) which is entering the atmosphere from frozen tundra across millions of square kilometres. This is CAUSED by the warming effect of the sun.</p>
<p>150 years ago the river Thames in London regularly froze over in winter and large Christmas fairs were held on the frozen river. How many time has it frozen over in the last 100 years?</p>
<p>Greenland was colonised by Danish vikings in the 1200s and archilogical finds clearly show that crops similar to those currently grown in northern Europe were cultivated there seasonally clearly showing that the temprature must have been at leas 5-7 centrigrade above current levels 800 years ago.</p>
<p>Isn&#8217;t it a little strange that this warming occurred without any human activity input (if you rule out cooking fires) and that vast swathes of the world DIDN&#8217;T become uninhabitable or sea levels rising to castasprophic levels).</p>
<p>The entire thrust of the global warming scam is to create a tax revenue to fund a one world government. They picked this one because they can blame the population in general. This is typical for the NWO cabal who also preach that inflation is caused by excessive wage claims for workers driving up costs when it is caused deliberately to transfer wealth by thier private banks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/global-cooling-alaskan-glaciers-grow-for-first-time-in-250-years/comment-page-2/#comment-588907</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 11:13:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=5364#comment-588907</guid>
		<description>&quot;The atmospheric carbon measurements done at Mauna Loa are not bullshit.&quot;

What are the measurements?  What are they supposed to mean? Where did you get your information?  You asked someone else for sources, so I am asking for yours.

Also:
&quot;&quot;400,000 years is enough time to compare because humans have only been around for 250,000 to 400,000 (according to evolution) or 6,000 according to creation. I’m sure there were times when there was more carbon, and the earth was way to hot for us to inhabit.&quot;&quot;

I still don&#039;t understand your logic here.  Honestly I was trying to figure out what % of 4.6billion equates to 400,000.  Since my pc calc barfed every time i tried, had to use the good ole pen and paper...   You&#039;re trying to tell me that your data is relevant because it represents approximately 0.00001% of the earth&#039;s history.  Hell, I&#039;ll give you the whole pre-cambrian... So I&#039;ll take out those 4 billion years, which means you gain an ENTIRE decimal point!  0.0001%!!!

Now, lets make a comparison.  Let&#039;s say you are going to make a statement about the US economy based on ONE day&#039;s worth of graphs.  Just one.  No more history.  You would be making a statement based on 0.003% of the year.  Probably not a sound idea right?  Considering the stock market has gone from 14k to 9k in one year... Definitly not a good idea.

Kind of like those stupid polls you see on tv.  People poll 1000 new yorkers and expect that 1000 people are representative of 300,000,000 americans.  This is all a game of statistics.

There was a point in time when co2 was 7000ppm.  How about this??

&quot;Earth&#039;s atmosphere today contains about 380 ppm CO2 (0.038%). Compared to former geologic times, our present atmosphere, like the Late Carboniferous atmosphere, is  CO2- impoverished! In the last 600 million years of Earth&#039;s history only the Carboniferous Period and our present age, the Quaternary Period, have witnessed CO2 levels less than 400 ppm.&quot;
From this page:
http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/Carboniferous_climate.html

I look at this as a form of debate, I&#039;m not trying to personally attack you or anything.  I&#039;m hoping that you are looking at the info I am presenting, and draw some conclusions.  Come back and tell me how I am wrong, then SHOW me how I am wrong.  

&quot;Global Warming&quot; just happens to be one of my buttons, because these arseholes are banking on people&#039;s ignorance of the facts... So they are making money off a natural process of this planet.  It&#039;d be like people making money off a natural process of the body, like waste excretion.  Oh wait... I get charged every time i flush my toilet... Damn.  I&#039;ll have to go outside and mark my territory more often, instead of flushing money down the toilet.

Also, one last thing:
&quot;On the flip side, I guess I would much rather that our earth be destroyed by something that would be considered an “act of god” than by ourselves. Thinking that way, let’s ignore it, or better yet, clearcut some more forests, kill some more reefs, spew some more exhaust. That way, we’ll never have to worry about the NWO fucking all of us. Much more pleasant way to go I think..&quot;

I&#039;d agree with that.  I&#039;d much rather go out by my own hand, than let the NWO turn me into a mindless slave.  Part of the reason i&#039;m &quot;debating&quot; with you is to try and broaden your perspective.  If you are open to new ideas, you become part of the hope of the world.  

I think there comes a point in every person&#039;s life where they have to stop and evaluate what they believe.  I came to this point 4 or 5 years ago.  It wasn&#039;t easy, because every time I found something that invalidated one belief, or idea, it would also invalidate another.  Sometimes it&#039;s easier to start from scratch than to try and repair something.  Therefore, I&#039;ve become pretty skeptical about anything I see on the news (FauxNews, Clinton News Network, et al).

You&#039;ve posted on this website, so you&#039;re either here to shout your ignorance from the rooftops so we all can laugh at you, or you are here because you have seen or heard something that isn&#039;t kosher with your current perception of the world.  

I ended up saying way more than I meant to.  Sorry for being long-winded, but some things can&#039;t be said in a few sentences.

Be careful and stay safe everyone!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The atmospheric carbon measurements done at Mauna Loa are not bullshit.&#8221;</p>
<p>What are the measurements?  What are they supposed to mean? Where did you get your information?  You asked someone else for sources, so I am asking for yours.</p>
<p>Also:<br />
&#8220;&#8221;400,000 years is enough time to compare because humans have only been around for 250,000 to 400,000 (according to evolution) or 6,000 according to creation. I’m sure there were times when there was more carbon, and the earth was way to hot for us to inhabit.&#8221;"</p>
<p>I still don&#8217;t understand your logic here.  Honestly I was trying to figure out what % of 4.6billion equates to 400,000.  Since my pc calc barfed every time i tried, had to use the good ole pen and paper&#8230;   You&#8217;re trying to tell me that your data is relevant because it represents approximately 0.00001% of the earth&#8217;s history.  Hell, I&#8217;ll give you the whole pre-cambrian&#8230; So I&#8217;ll take out those 4 billion years, which means you gain an ENTIRE decimal point!  0.0001%!!!</p>
<p>Now, lets make a comparison.  Let&#8217;s say you are going to make a statement about the US economy based on ONE day&#8217;s worth of graphs.  Just one.  No more history.  You would be making a statement based on 0.003% of the year.  Probably not a sound idea right?  Considering the stock market has gone from 14k to 9k in one year&#8230; Definitly not a good idea.</p>
<p>Kind of like those stupid polls you see on tv.  People poll 1000 new yorkers and expect that 1000 people are representative of 300,000,000 americans.  This is all a game of statistics.</p>
<p>There was a point in time when co2 was 7000ppm.  How about this??</p>
<p>&#8220;Earth&#8217;s atmosphere today contains about 380 ppm CO2 (0.038%). Compared to former geologic times, our present atmosphere, like the Late Carboniferous atmosphere, is  CO2- impoverished! In the last 600 million years of Earth&#8217;s history only the Carboniferous Period and our present age, the Quaternary Period, have witnessed CO2 levels less than 400 ppm.&#8221;<br />
From this page:<br />
<a href="http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/Carboniferous_climate.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.geocraft.com/WVFoss.....imate.html</a></p>
<p>I look at this as a form of debate, I&#8217;m not trying to personally attack you or anything.  I&#8217;m hoping that you are looking at the info I am presenting, and draw some conclusions.  Come back and tell me how I am wrong, then SHOW me how I am wrong.  </p>
<p>&#8220;Global Warming&#8221; just happens to be one of my buttons, because these arseholes are banking on people&#8217;s ignorance of the facts&#8230; So they are making money off a natural process of this planet.  It&#8217;d be like people making money off a natural process of the body, like waste excretion.  Oh wait&#8230; I get charged every time i flush my toilet&#8230; Damn.  I&#8217;ll have to go outside and mark my territory more often, instead of flushing money down the toilet.</p>
<p>Also, one last thing:<br />
&#8220;On the flip side, I guess I would much rather that our earth be destroyed by something that would be considered an “act of god” than by ourselves. Thinking that way, let’s ignore it, or better yet, clearcut some more forests, kill some more reefs, spew some more exhaust. That way, we’ll never have to worry about the NWO fucking all of us. Much more pleasant way to go I think..&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;d agree with that.  I&#8217;d much rather go out by my own hand, than let the NWO turn me into a mindless slave.  Part of the reason i&#8217;m &#8220;debating&#8221; with you is to try and broaden your perspective.  If you are open to new ideas, you become part of the hope of the world.  </p>
<p>I think there comes a point in every person&#8217;s life where they have to stop and evaluate what they believe.  I came to this point 4 or 5 years ago.  It wasn&#8217;t easy, because every time I found something that invalidated one belief, or idea, it would also invalidate another.  Sometimes it&#8217;s easier to start from scratch than to try and repair something.  Therefore, I&#8217;ve become pretty skeptical about anything I see on the news (FauxNews, Clinton News Network, et al).</p>
<p>You&#8217;ve posted on this website, so you&#8217;re either here to shout your ignorance from the rooftops so we all can laugh at you, or you are here because you have seen or heard something that isn&#8217;t kosher with your current perception of the world.  </p>
<p>I ended up saying way more than I meant to.  Sorry for being long-winded, but some things can&#8217;t be said in a few sentences.</p>
<p>Be careful and stay safe everyone!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/global-cooling-alaskan-glaciers-grow-for-first-time-in-250-years/comment-page-2/#comment-588878</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 08:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=5364#comment-588878</guid>
		<description>I just read more stupid science, and had to post a follow-up:

&quot;When glaciers melt and chunks fall off, they cool the certain sections of ocean which cool continents. One of the predictions of a global warming model is that Europe will get much colder for a while.&quot;

What you&#039;re referring to (i think) is probably the way the atlantic current moves warm / cold water and how it affects the weather in europe.  Yes, glaciers can alter the ocean temperature.  Hell, I heard about a huge glacial shelf that broke off of the west coast of Antarctica.  Real big, 160 square miles (which is 0.01% of the total ice cover of antarctica).  What that news report DID NOT mention, was how the rate of glacier growth on the east side of Antarctica has been speeding up.  Article here:
http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/56731

Read before you post more &quot;stupid science&quot; please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just read more stupid science, and had to post a follow-up:</p>
<p>&#8220;When glaciers melt and chunks fall off, they cool the certain sections of ocean which cool continents. One of the predictions of a global warming model is that Europe will get much colder for a while.&#8221;</p>
<p>What you&#8217;re referring to (i think) is probably the way the atlantic current moves warm / cold water and how it affects the weather in europe.  Yes, glaciers can alter the ocean temperature.  Hell, I heard about a huge glacial shelf that broke off of the west coast of Antarctica.  Real big, 160 square miles (which is 0.01% of the total ice cover of antarctica).  What that news report DID NOT mention, was how the rate of glacier growth on the east side of Antarctica has been speeding up.  Article here:<br />
<a href="http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/56731" rel="nofollow">http://www.americanchronicle.com/articles/56731</a></p>
<p>Read before you post more &#8220;stupid science&#8221; please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gods Wrath</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/global-cooling-alaskan-glaciers-grow-for-first-time-in-250-years/comment-page-2/#comment-588876</link>
		<dc:creator>Gods Wrath</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 08:56:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=5364#comment-588876</guid>
		<description>Cooling or Warming,

The Lord will destroy the earth this time by Fire!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cooling or Warming,</p>
<p>The Lord will destroy the earth this time by Fire!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wuzup with the stupid science</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/global-cooling-alaskan-glaciers-grow-for-first-time-in-250-years/comment-page-2/#comment-588872</link>
		<dc:creator>wuzup with the stupid science</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2008 08:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=5364#comment-588872</guid>
		<description>response to jason, 95

400,000 years is enough time to compare because humans have only been around for 250,000 to 400,000 (according to evolution) or 6,000 according to creation.  I&#039;m sure there were times when there was more carbon, and the earth was way to hot for us to inhabit. 

On the flip side, I guess I would much rather that our earth be destroyed by something that would be considered an &quot;act of god&quot; than by ourselves.  Thinking that way, let&#039;s ignore it, or better yet, clearcut some more forests, kill some more reefs, spew some more exhaust.  That way, we&#039;ll never have to worry about the NWO fucking all of us.  Much more pleasant way to go I think..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>response to jason, 95</p>
<p>400,000 years is enough time to compare because humans have only been around for 250,000 to 400,000 (according to evolution) or 6,000 according to creation.  I&#8217;m sure there were times when there was more carbon, and the earth was way to hot for us to inhabit. </p>
<p>On the flip side, I guess I would much rather that our earth be destroyed by something that would be considered an &#8220;act of god&#8221; than by ourselves.  Thinking that way, let&#8217;s ignore it, or better yet, clearcut some more forests, kill some more reefs, spew some more exhaust.  That way, we&#8217;ll never have to worry about the NWO fucking all of us.  Much more pleasant way to go I think..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
