Strawman: Presenting a misrepresentation of the opponent’s position and then refuting it, thus giving the appearance that the opponent’s actual position has been refuted.

The entire article shredded Bush’s official story and your here right on cue with your moronic tripe.

YES!! That is how bad this country has gotten with illegal’s. Once again our country is helping people out who either want to kill us, or don’t really care about us!!!!!!!

So you people who don’t belive me… GO FUCK YOURSELVES. SPEND $8000.00 AND LEARN YOURSLEVES.

9/11 Was Not a “inside job”. The gove new that people were going to try to use planes as a giant missle—YES.. They’ve known that!! But during Clinton’s rain of HELL he didn’t see that. He was to busy getting blowjobs in the oval office. At the same god damn time he was passing a bunch of crap on how to talk to people and this political corrective crap. He never thought who the enemy was!! He didn’t think about muslim jerks who want to kill and murder any american at the time. Whether the whole thing is right or wrong, I will always be the AMERICAN who stands by Cheney! Call me a troll or worse, I really don’t care! I’ll stand by for what is right whether you can see it or not!! Maybe these fucks just prolonged the big attacks?

Let’s wait and see!! Obama is you new god!

It gets better – Bush helped coverup

Intelligence Report here:
http://www.larouchepac.com/node/10997

A: Who said you were required to disagree with anything?

Q: ““who knows how these criminals did what they did?”
hey thats called double think!”

A: Double speak would be if I said “No one knows what they did but I know what they did”. How can no one know but I know? That’s double speak. Its assuming 2 opposing things can happen at once. You said there were planes and not planes. That is double speak.

Q: “who said the debri of the planes in the cleanup of the trade centres was never found?”

A: The world. After 8 years not one single piece of debris has been verified from ANY of the 4 planes from ANY of the 4 locations on 9/11. The FBI has said it tested and verified NOTHING with regards to the planes because “we all saw it on TV” (FOIA 2008).

Q: “which seems the only reliable part of this evidence?”

A: Thats correct. If you are never able to verify anything, like the WMD’s in Iraq, the existence of the “planes” is in serious jeopardy.

Q: “i still believe in the possibility, that the detonations could have turned those engines to dust”

A: Belief systems should NEVER enter into an airliner crash investigation. Ever. Only go by verifiable debris. Of course there were demolitions. There was no jet fuel because there were no commercial planes on 9/11. The reason the 8, 6-ton, 9-ft wide, titanium “engines” have disappeared….is because there were no commercial planes on 9/11. The reason no tailsections (a first in aviation history) have ever been seen, photographed, or verified in ANY way…is because there were no commercial planes on 9/11. The reason no luggage was ever found from any of the planes, except what was easily planted by authorities like expired unburnt passports of the supposed terrorists etc, was because there were no commercial planes on 9/11. Not ONE SEAT was ever found, filmed, or verified from any of the crash sites. A first in aviation history.

You ask very good questions. I hope you continue your research. Last piece of advice….never “believe” something. Know it. Only go by verifiable evidence. Witnesses, video, home movies, and film have NEVER in aviation history verified a plane crash. Only wreckage does.

your quote -
“who knows how these criminals did what they did?”
hey thats called double think!

but wait, my question remains,
who said the debri of the planes in the cleanup of the trade centres was never found?

maybe i am uninformed, but who claimed that,
which seems the only reliable part of this evidence?

just answer me that last question, thanks.

my post also refers to the last reply i got a few comments up,
if gulliani ordered the destruction of all debris straight after the trade centre attack,
then who, or what independant investigation has now come out and said, there
were no titanium engines found,

maybe i didnt follow all the story yet, and i should know this stuff,
but do you?

i still believe in the possibility, that the detonations could have turned those engines to dust,
like it did with the steel foundations.
but
i am willing to have my opinion swayed,
to cure this, case of, doublethink.