 |
 |
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
|
|||
 |
|||
|
|||
 |
|||
|
Is Emanuel the adviser on gov tape?
- Text size
FRAN SPIELMAN AND ABDON M. PALLASCH
Chicago Sun Times
Friday, Dec 12, 2008
President-elect Barack Obama’s chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, refused to take questions from reporters this morning about whether he was the Obama “advisor” named in the criminal complaint against Gov. Rod Blagojevich.
The complaint states Blagojevich wanted a promise of a high-level appointment or some other reward for Blagojevich in exchange for Blagojevich naming Obama’s friend Valerie Jarrett to replace him in the U.S. Senate.
Emanuel was uncharacteristically absent from Obama’s news conference this morning. He was spotted two hours later in the lobby of Chicago’s City Hall. He was there to listen to his two children performing in a concert with their school, Anshe Emet.
A Sun-Times reporter pressed him to comment about whether he was the emissary named in the criminal complaint.
(ARTICLE CONTINUES BELOW)
“You’re wasting your time,” Emanuel said. “I’m not going to say a word to you. I’m going to do this with my children. Dont do that. I’m a father. I have two kids. I’m not going to do it.”
Asked, “Can’t you do both?” Emanuel replied, “I’m not as capable as you. I’m going to be a father. I’m allowed to be a father,” and he pushed the reporter’s digital recorder away.
-
- Social bookmarks
- Email this article
-
- Print this page
- Share on Twitter
December 15th, 2008 at 4:20 am
silence usally means somethings fishy
December 15th, 2008 at 6:50 am
this guy is a dirty criminal
December 15th, 2008 at 10:06 am
Criminal or not you gotta respect when people are with there children.
December 15th, 2008 at 10:22 am
Weres the crime with wanting a cabinet post in exchange for nomination? hsvr you forgotten the last 8 years? and what about Cheney being the largest single stock holder of a corporastion that got no bid contracts and then defrauded the American people and the troops of billions of dollars? is this crazy.
December 15th, 2008 at 10:23 am
No when a nwo scum-bag is with his parents that is exactly when you hit them fool. We want their kids to know what’s going on, when ever someone is working to un-do the constitution, they give up their rights, they are not allowed any quiet time, and when they show their slimy faces in public they are fair game, if you don’t understand this concept, then you’d better stay at home too because if you stand up for the criminals, you also become fair game, that goes for their lawyers also! NO REST FOR THE WICKED!
December 15th, 2008 at 11:06 am
Emmanuels kids need to be taken away from him and put with Foster Parents LOL then sold to pedophiles
December 15th, 2008 at 11:08 am
all of a sudden this guy drops off the media radar. hmm… with bush not out and obama not in yet i feel a little uneasy. i feel like were being mind fu….
December 15th, 2008 at 11:22 am
Don’t make excuses for the Obamaites. What happened illegally in the Bush Administration has nothing to do with these criminals. Is this going to be the new mantra: Bush did it, so I can too? Start holding your messiah and his apostles accountable for their actions.
December 15th, 2008 at 1:09 pm
They are all bloody theives and dirty rotten scoundrals! They all need to be tried in front of a court of law. They have commited many crimes against humanity.
December 15th, 2008 at 2:07 pm
He had a good teacher….Obama. “Just ignore the questions & requests for public information, it’ll go away…..and if they don’t…..what are they gonna do, take us to the Supreme Court? HAHAHA!”
Pricks, hope they all get force-fed Bunker Busters……….
December 15th, 2008 at 2:37 pm
They can not touch Emanuel!!! He is a dual Israeli citizen with ties to the Mossad.the Jewish lobby runs Washington.The Jewish lobby tells the cia and the fbi what to think.
December 15th, 2008 at 4:02 pm
everytime they have to cover their asses—-they have a “anti american political sex scandal” in the fake msm
—————————-
in this case—-it was the failed mumbai false flag attack that was supposed to start a war between pakistan and india
but chabad lubavitch was in a little too close proximity
——————-
now the fake msm wants to try to cover it up in people’s minds
but the leaders of all the countries involved and investigating it know exactly whats going on
———————–
globalists come in all types and beliefs—-but this could cause alot of trouble for the jewish wing of the globalists—–and it mightve caused the billions of innocent jews to feel nervous
but the world makes it through—-the world understands that it wasn’t “the jews”—-but that in any group there are bad apples
and now the knowledge has been showed to the world—without conflict
worldwide internet victory against the nwo
cyber america
December 15th, 2008 at 4:58 pm
This story will go away by the end of this week. Just watch it disappear.
December 15th, 2008 at 10:35 pm
Thats because there is no story, just more speculation to keep you on your toes
December 15th, 2008 at 10:40 pm
james, randk:
http://www.hirhome.com/israel/subtle.htm
Antisemitism is everywhere in the mass media
Sometimes it is relatively subtle…
Historical and Investigative Research – 3 June 2006 by Francisco Gil-White There is of course a great deal of blatant antisemitism in the mass media. But it is also good to be aware of the subtle ways in which antisemitism is pushed by the major media outlets. Why? Because, once it dawns on you how carefully antisemitism is inserted into the smallest details, you will realize that it is everywhere, and that it is there by design.
What you see to the right is a recent example of “News Summaries” that the well-known British magazine The Economist regularly sends out.
In this news summary, The Economist writes:
“Violence flared on Israel’s borders. Israel and the Lebanese militia, Hizbullah, fought their fiercest border duel for years. And Israel sent special forces back into the Gaza Strip to kill Palestinians firing rockets into southern Israel.”
What is the problem with what The Economist writes? Everything.
The Economist refers to the Hizbullah as a “Lebanese militia,” but that is not what Hizbullah is. Hizbullah is a group dedicated to killing innocent civilian men, women, and children, and therefore Hizbullah is a terrorist organization. When terrorist organizations that specialize in the killing of Jewish civilians are called “militias,” as above, what we have is an effort to legitimize the killing of Jewish civilians. The effort to legitimize the killing of Jewish civilians is, of course, extreme antisemitism. That’s what The Economist is pushing.
The online resource Wikipedia explains about Hizbullah (or Hezbollah) as follows:
“Hezbollah is regarded by many in the Arab and Muslim worlds as a legitimate resistance movement and is a recognized political party in Lebanon, where it has participated in government. However, a number of Western governments, including that of the United States, have designated it a terrorist organization, while the European Union has designated the party’s external security wing, but not the organization as a whole, as a terrorist organization.”[1]
So, even the United States government, whose foreign policy is designed to destroy the Jewish state, as documented in detail by HIR,[2] feels compelled to recognize in public that Hizbullah is a terrorist organization. As Wikipedia states, many Muslims consider Hizbullah a legitimate resistance movement, but we may ignore this view: when Hizbullah kills innocent Jews across the border in Israel, it is not resisting anybody: it is attacking innocent civilians. Moreover, Muslims are commanded in the Qur’an that killing “infidels” (non-Muslims who refuse to convert to Islam) is a good thing,[3] so the opinion of Muslims on whether Hizbullah is legitimate or not will obviously not coincide with Western liberal-democratic values that endorse ethnic and religious tolerance. The Economist claims to have a “commitment to the classical 19th-century Liberal ideas of its founder [James Wilson],”[4] but at least where the Jews are concerned, The Economist has abandoned Western liberalism for what Wikipedia states is the mainstream Muslim perspective, which is that Hizbullah is supposedly a legitimate “militia.”
Let us look at the excerpt in The Economist again, that we may examine the second part:…
Richard Markham Reply:
February 15th, 2009 at 8:42 pm
“So even the United States government, whose foreign policy is designed to destroy the Jewish State….” Who the F#$k are you Bullsh&%$*&g! Our foreign policy is designed to destroy the Jewish state? Is that why we give them $3 billion a year? Is that why we always support Israel in the UN? Is that why we’re in Iraq fighting their war for them? Israel is not a victim, they have nuclear weapons and the most advanced military in the mideast. Israel is an apartheid, racist state. They kill innocent women and children daily. Fuck you, Fuck zionism, and fuck Israel!!!
December 16th, 2008 at 8:52 am
Gosh golly, Marc Rich’s (aka Reich) henchman wouldn’t do anything like that. Obama’s self investigation to look into the matter would have found that out. HA!!! I love it when the criminals INVESTIGATE THEMSELVES, and the media headlines read NO WRONGDOING. Business as usual.
December 16th, 2008 at 11:56 am
Really Truth #15 you should pick up your torah before you start hitting up the conspiracy sites, and learn about ancient jewish culture in comparison to today. You will see a huge difference in the concept of a homeland for jewish people. Once you realize that Israel is a secular country, under the guise of a jewish state and its creation is against God’s will you will then begin to understand why so much hardship has encompassed the jewish community since the end of WW1 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1y6rh79OKVQ or
December 16th, 2008 at 6:26 pm
just follow the money, what other nobody besides moses can go to the desert with nothing and come back and be seated at the highest levels of wall street finance. and 2 years later earn 16 million. in the italian mob he would be called a made man. remember , it took hoover 30 years before he woud admit their was a mob… its getting pretty obvious there is a jewish mob, a mob that has a lot of pull within the isrealis govt. there is nothing racist about discussing this issue.
it a matter of fact.
December 17th, 2008 at 2:58 am
never liked this guy… where did he come from? Illinois sucks
December 17th, 2008 at 12:45 pm
So this punk-ass thug thinks he’s a bad ass by mailing dead fish to people he doesn’t like??? I wish we had this punk in our military outfit in Viet Nam. We would have shown him BAD ASS… this little punk Emanuel would have been whining for his mama!!!