
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Judge Says Hyperlinks Should Be Banned to Save Newspapers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.infowars.com/judge-says-hyperlinks-should-be-banned-to-save-newspapers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.infowars.com/judge-says-hyperlinks-should-be-banned-to-save-newspapers/</link>
	<description>Because there's a war on for your mind.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 03:54:05 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: ac</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/judge-says-hyperlinks-should-be-banned-to-save-newspapers/comment-page-2/#comment-1146105</link>
		<dc:creator>ac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 16:33:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=13244#comment-1146105</guid>
		<description>Q. Is the correct term &#039;bold face lie&#039; or &#039;bald faced lie&#039; or another variation?

A.  Answer

&quot;The correct term is bald-faced, and refers to a face wihout whiskers. Beards were commonly worn by businessmen in the 18th and 19th century as an attempt to mask facial expressions when making business deals. Thus a bald-faced liar was a very good liar indeed, and was able to lie without the guilt showing on his face.

&quot;The more correct term is &quot;bald faced or bare faced lie&quot; (bare is more common in Great Britain). It refers to a &quot;shameless&quot; or &quot;brazen&quot; lie. One where the teller does not attempt to hide his face while telling it.

&quot;It&#039;s just the last 5 yrs or so that &quot;bold&quot; has come into usage. It refers to typeface. It is used metaphorically in speech. In the same way that a typesetter uses bold face type to highlight specific text and set it apart, a bold face lie stands out in such a way as to not be mistaken for the truth.

&quot;More Information

&quot;The phrase can either be used as bold-faced lie, as in someone with a bold enough face to lie (bold meaning daring) or someone bold enough to lie to your face; it can also be used as bald-faced lie, where the older meaning of bald (meaning uncovered or unconcealed) - the more correct usage with this term is bare-faced lie.&quot; 

http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Is_the_correct_term_%27bold_face_lie%27_or_%27bald_faced_lie%27_or_another_variation</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Q. Is the correct term &#8216;bold face lie&#8217; or &#8216;bald faced lie&#8217; or another variation?</p>
<p>A.  Answer</p>
<p>&#8220;The correct term is bald-faced, and refers to a face wihout whiskers. Beards were commonly worn by businessmen in the 18th and 19th century as an attempt to mask facial expressions when making business deals. Thus a bald-faced liar was a very good liar indeed, and was able to lie without the guilt showing on his face.</p>
<p>&#8220;The more correct term is &#8220;bald faced or bare faced lie&#8221; (bare is more common in Great Britain). It refers to a &#8220;shameless&#8221; or &#8220;brazen&#8221; lie. One where the teller does not attempt to hide his face while telling it.</p>
<p>&#8220;It&#8217;s just the last 5 yrs or so that &#8220;bold&#8221; has come into usage. It refers to typeface. It is used metaphorically in speech. In the same way that a typesetter uses bold face type to highlight specific text and set it apart, a bold face lie stands out in such a way as to not be mistaken for the truth.</p>
<p>&#8220;More Information</p>
<p>&#8220;The phrase can either be used as bold-faced lie, as in someone with a bold enough face to lie (bold meaning daring) or someone bold enough to lie to your face; it can also be used as bald-faced lie, where the older meaning of bald (meaning uncovered or unconcealed) &#8211; the more correct usage with this term is bare-faced lie.&#8221; </p>
<p><a href="http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Is_the_correct_term_%27bold_face_lie%27_or_%27bald_faced_lie%27_or_another_variation" rel="nofollow">http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Is_t....._variation</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ac</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/judge-says-hyperlinks-should-be-banned-to-save-newspapers/comment-page-2/#comment-1146100</link>
		<dc:creator>ac</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 16:28:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=13244#comment-1146100</guid>
		<description>All of the above. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All of the above. <img src='http://www.infowars.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: me</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/judge-says-hyperlinks-should-be-banned-to-save-newspapers/comment-page-2/#comment-1143685</link>
		<dc:creator>me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 05:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=13244#comment-1143685</guid>
		<description>FUCK THAT PUSSY USING THE NAME PEDRO GONSALEZ HE&#039;S A STUPID MORON WITH NOTHING MORE TO DO THAN PERPETUATE BULLSHIT AND HE OBVIOUSLY FEARS SPANISH PEOPLE CUZ HE WOULD NEVER TALK THAT SHIT IN PUBLIUC SO HE USES THIS SITE TO VENT HIS INFLAMED IGNORANCE......PUSSY</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FUCK THAT PUSSY USING THE NAME PEDRO GONSALEZ HE&#8217;S A STUPID MORON WITH NOTHING MORE TO DO THAN PERPETUATE BULLSHIT AND HE OBVIOUSLY FEARS SPANISH PEOPLE CUZ HE WOULD NEVER TALK THAT SHIT IN PUBLIUC SO HE USES THIS SITE TO VENT HIS INFLAMED IGNORANCE&#8230;&#8230;PUSSY</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tamaraehawk</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/judge-says-hyperlinks-should-be-banned-to-save-newspapers/comment-page-2/#comment-1143634</link>
		<dc:creator>tamaraehawk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 04 Jul 2009 04:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=13244#comment-1143634</guid>
		<description>ohhh it gets worse..
from a Publishers Weekly review of posner&#039;s book, &quot;not a suicide pact: the Constitution in a time of national emergency&quot;:

... Saying we must balance the harm new security measures inflict on personal liberty against the increased security those measures provide, Posner comes down, in most but not quite all respects, on the side of increased government power. He advocates that coercive and even brutal forms of interrogation should be allowed in proper circumstances, that all communications within the United States should be subject to interception, and that government should have authority to enjoin publication of classified information. Posner (An Affair of State) would impose limits and qualifications on these assertions of government power, but even so, his views will provoke Category 5 protest from civil libertarians...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ohhh it gets worse..<br />
from a Publishers Weekly review of posner&#8217;s book, &#8220;not a suicide pact: the Constitution in a time of national emergency&#8221;:</p>
<p>&#8230; Saying we must balance the harm new security measures inflict on personal liberty against the increased security those measures provide, Posner comes down, in most but not quite all respects, on the side of increased government power. He advocates that coercive and even brutal forms of interrogation should be allowed in proper circumstances, that all communications within the United States should be subject to interception, and that government should have authority to enjoin publication of classified information. Posner (An Affair of State) would impose limits and qualifications on these assertions of government power, but even so, his views will provoke Category 5 protest from civil libertarians&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Censored 2</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/judge-says-hyperlinks-should-be-banned-to-save-newspapers/comment-page-2/#comment-1142558</link>
		<dc:creator>Censored 2</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 21:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=13244#comment-1142558</guid>
		<description>kick those MSM whores to the curb and do the job for them-- dont visit their sites or click on their links.  watch their online ad $$$ go the way of their print versions, into the toilet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>kick those MSM whores to the curb and do the job for them&#8211; dont visit their sites or click on their links.  watch their online ad $$$ go the way of their print versions, into the toilet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: moriah</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/judge-says-hyperlinks-should-be-banned-to-save-newspapers/comment-page-2/#comment-1141893</link>
		<dc:creator>moriah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 17:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=13244#comment-1141893</guid>
		<description>I say we boycott the Alex Jones show until he clarifies or takes back what he said about gay couples adopting kids yesterday. That was something that I would expect from Mike Savage I thought Alex was more of a free thinker and believer in equality than that. I am so disapointed….anyone else?  I think this was just a slimy attempt to pander to the religious bigots that tune into his show and/or provide funding, either way it was a disgusting and backward comment that shouldn&#039;t be allowed to slide.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I say we boycott the Alex Jones show until he clarifies or takes back what he said about gay couples adopting kids yesterday. That was something that I would expect from Mike Savage I thought Alex was more of a free thinker and believer in equality than that. I am so disapointed….anyone else?  I think this was just a slimy attempt to pander to the religious bigots that tune into his show and/or provide funding, either way it was a disgusting and backward comment that shouldn&#8217;t be allowed to slide.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Head</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/judge-says-hyperlinks-should-be-banned-to-save-newspapers/comment-page-2/#comment-1141746</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Head</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 16:00:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=13244#comment-1141746</guid>
		<description>What is with this &quot;old&quot; mind control.  His comment has nothing to do with being old.  He is a traitor upholding the propaganda arm of the new world order.  You, and many others have been mind controlled into believing it has something to do with his age, when it does not.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What is with this &#8220;old&#8221; mind control.  His comment has nothing to do with being old.  He is a traitor upholding the propaganda arm of the new world order.  You, and many others have been mind controlled into believing it has something to do with his age, when it does not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tomtom</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/judge-says-hyperlinks-should-be-banned-to-save-newspapers/comment-page-2/#comment-1141707</link>
		<dc:creator>tomtom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 15:37:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=13244#comment-1141707</guid>
		<description>Ga spelen. Welke rechter gaat ineens over hyperlinks klagen zonder externe invloed van een rijke bedrijf of regeringselement in verband met het wurgelen van vrije informatie of winst.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ga spelen. Welke rechter gaat ineens over hyperlinks klagen zonder externe invloed van een rijke bedrijf of regeringselement in verband met het wurgelen van vrije informatie of winst.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Head</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/judge-says-hyperlinks-should-be-banned-to-save-newspapers/comment-page-2/#comment-1141687</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Head</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 15:29:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=13244#comment-1141687</guid>
		<description>Hey red,

Did you know that distraction is the most prevalent form of mind control? That is when you allow others to choose and control the topic of discussion. When asked to stick to the subject, you are being mind controlled. It is the same as saying, stay irrelevant, stay uninformed, stay distracted. It only works with the ignorant.  As the most prevalent form of mind control what do you suppose Alex&#039;s first rule of comments is?

&quot;You will stay on topic. 

You will not include links to websites and videos not associated with the topic. 

You will not post the same comment multiple times. 

You will not solicit anyone to buy or sell products or services, or to make donations of any kind. You will not include links to products in your comment. 

You will not post anything libelous, defamatory, harmful, threatening, harassing, abusive, invasive of another&#039;s privacy, hateful, racially or ethnically objectionable, or otherwise illegal. 

You will not make threats to other users or people not associated with the site. 

If you violate these rules, your post will be deleted. 

Remember: you are a guest here. It is not censorship if you violate the rules and your post is deleted. All civilizations have rules and if you violate them you can expect to be ostracized from the tribe. &quot;


Anyone with the ability to think can see that these unamerican policies can be used to mind control you.  Hey did you ever hear this before?  It may be a bit of topic but see if your mind is able to wrap itself around it.  

I have sworn upon the altar of God, eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man. 
Thomas Jefferson</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey red,</p>
<p>Did you know that distraction is the most prevalent form of mind control? That is when you allow others to choose and control the topic of discussion. When asked to stick to the subject, you are being mind controlled. It is the same as saying, stay irrelevant, stay uninformed, stay distracted. It only works with the ignorant.  As the most prevalent form of mind control what do you suppose Alex&#8217;s first rule of comments is?</p>
<p>&#8220;You will stay on topic. </p>
<p>You will not include links to websites and videos not associated with the topic. </p>
<p>You will not post the same comment multiple times. </p>
<p>You will not solicit anyone to buy or sell products or services, or to make donations of any kind. You will not include links to products in your comment. </p>
<p>You will not post anything libelous, defamatory, harmful, threatening, harassing, abusive, invasive of another&#8217;s privacy, hateful, racially or ethnically objectionable, or otherwise illegal. </p>
<p>You will not make threats to other users or people not associated with the site. </p>
<p>If you violate these rules, your post will be deleted. </p>
<p>Remember: you are a guest here. It is not censorship if you violate the rules and your post is deleted. All civilizations have rules and if you violate them you can expect to be ostracized from the tribe. &#8221;</p>
<p>Anyone with the ability to think can see that these unamerican policies can be used to mind control you.  Hey did you ever hear this before?  It may be a bit of topic but see if your mind is able to wrap itself around it.  </p>
<p>I have sworn upon the altar of God, eternal hostility against every form of tyranny over the mind of man.<br />
Thomas Jefferson</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mr.Geltschmidt</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/judge-says-hyperlinks-should-be-banned-to-save-newspapers/comment-page-2/#comment-1141680</link>
		<dc:creator>Mr.Geltschmidt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 15:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=13244#comment-1141680</guid>
		<description>yes they should take down the internet the energy saved would be great. Or a great tax .... Vits :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yes they should take down the internet the energy saved would be great. Or a great tax &#8230;. Vits <img src='http://www.infowars.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
