Comments on: Mississippi Passes Legislation Protecting Gun Owners During Martial Law

By: MS.gurl

MS.gurl — Fri, 27 Feb 2009 02:25:44 +0000

Geez Ken…if you’re from here you should have at least read the passed version. It’s NRA backed legislation. I doubt very seriously they would back something that takes our guns away. Which it doesn’t.

By: MS.gurl

MS.gurl — Fri, 27 Feb 2009 02:23:37 +0000

It is NRA backed legislation. The passed version is online. You might want to go read it before you condemn it.

By: MS.gurl

MS.gurl — Fri, 27 Feb 2009 01:59:00 +0000

Gary, MS. tested our rights before this was passed. During Katrina martial law was declared and the gov. announced that we had the right to defend ourselves and protect our property with deadly force if necessary. Our gov. isn’t likely to take our guns away during a declaration of martial law. We were the best deterrent during an emergency.

By: MS.gurl

MS.gurl — Fri, 27 Feb 2009 01:49:32 +0000

We have a gunslinger law…

By: Ken Harris

Ken Harris — Tue, 17 Feb 2009 19:04:44 +0000

It’s a shame that my message keeps getting deleted about this Mississippi Bill, its important and it needs to be seen. Some of these other message that are posted here are good but when I see people saying stuff like “When martial law gets declared there moving to Mississippi”

That’s a sad statement because if you read the Bill from pages 4-10, they will quickly see that moving to Mississippi is not a good ideal.

I support Alex Jones and the movement, but if yall keep deleting the message people are going to be mislead into thinking Mississippi is going to let these people keep there guns.

The Bill is misleading final warning, the Mississippi No confiscate firearms Bill is a Bill that makes people think they will not take there guns away then set them up for failure. People don’t understand that if the Govnor declares martial law then they won’t take your guns according to the Bill, the loop hole in the Bill is that it is a differance between the Govnor call martial law and the President calling martial law. If the Govnor calls martial law your guns are safe, but if the President calls martial law your gun are gone the Govnor is working for the President.
The problem that comes into play is if you stand up when they come to your house and you in your mine thinking that they won’t take your guns because you are protected by that so-called Bill and come to fine out after they have took your guns and dragged you and your family off to a FEMA concentration camp that the President had called martial law and the Govnor had resended his amendments and you have been betrayed with a kiss by the good oh Mississippi State Government.
You people better take heed if you plan on coming to Mississippi, I live here I know they are crooked and they are tryind to trick you with words I have been a cop here for years and I know they are not right they are trying to trick you.

By: Dirk Diggler

Dirk Diggler — Tue, 17 Feb 2009 05:35:08 +0000

Look at how this Zionist Jackbooted thug moron disgraced himself and heaped shame, scorn, ridicule and humiliation on his family and his department! POST THIS EVERYWHERE YOU CAN!:
northjersey.com/news/crimeandcourts/39353857.html

By: Gary

Gary — Sat, 14 Feb 2009 10:31:30 +0000

By the way, I forgot to ask where you found this law posted. I’d like to see the full document, as well as have the link to it, please.

By: Gary

Gary — Sat, 14 Feb 2009 09:41:46 +0000

Yes, I’m very well aware of all that. In fact, our presidents have all been hand-picked puppets of the elite all the way back to Woodrow Wilson. As for the difference between a democracy and republic, I’m also very much aware of that, also. I don’t know where you got the idea I’m not, frankly.

What I was saying to Food For Thought above is that Infowars is only posting these mainstream articles as they were originally written so that we can see that this is really happening and that the mainstream media know it is happening (even though their coverage of it is usually distorted, of course).

As for my slavery, NO! I will never accept it! Down with the New World Order! The answer to 1984 is 1776!

By: Gary

Gary — Sat, 14 Feb 2009 09:03:10 +0000

EXACTLY! Finally, someone who “gets it!”

ALL gun control laws, all the way back to 1933, are DIRECT VIOLATIONS of the Second Amendment. Period.

As it is written, the Second Amendment places absolutely NO restrictions whatsoever on:

WHO may own a weapon

WHAT types of weapons we may have

WHERE we may carry these weapons

WHEN we may carry a weapon

HOW we may use a weapon

By: Gary

Gary — Sat, 14 Feb 2009 08:58:27 +0000

Exactly as I called it! The use of the word “restrict” was the tip-off for me, in the article above. When the Lt. Gov. said the bill would “restrict” confiscations few people picked up on the subtle difference between a “restriction” and a “prohibition” and immediately took it to mean their guns were safe from seizure during martial law (which is pretty idiotic, if you think about it, given the nature of martial law). If the Lt. Gov. had truly intended to protect gun owners from confiscations, he would have used the term “prohibit” instead of “restrict,” which would have meant there would be no confiscations at all. As it is worded, the state is reserving its power to decide what restrictions it will place upon itself. As always, governments never voluntarily relinquish their power.