 |
 |
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
|
|||
 |
|||
|
|||
 |
|||
|
Moscow calls for anti-US alliance
- Text size
Adrian Blomfield
Sydney Morning Herald
October 10, 2008
THE President of Russia has called on Europe’s leaders to create a new world order that would minimise the role of the United States.
Confident that a row with Europe prompted by Russia’s invasion of Georgia in August was over, Dmitry Medvedev arrived in the French spa town of Evian on Wednesday determined to woo his fellow leaders into creating an anti-US front.
Gone was the kind of wartime rhetoric that saw Mr Medvedev lash out at the West and describe his Georgian counterpart, Mikheil Saakashvili, as a “lunatic”. Instead Mr Medvedev spoke of a Russia that was “absolutely not interested in confrontation”, and outlined plans for a new security pact to ban the use of force in Europe.
Yet there was little doubt that Mr Medvedev was playing the divide-and-rule tactics of Vladimir Putin, his predecessor and now Prime Minister, by seeking to pit the US against its European allies.
In a speech delivered to European leaders at a conference hosted by the French President, Nicolas Sarkozy, to discuss the international financial crisis, Mr Medvedev sought to show that the US was at the root of all the world’s problems. He blamed Washington’s “economic egotism” for the world’s financial woes and then accused the Bush Administration of taking Europe to the brink of a new cold war by pursuing a deliberately divisive foreign policy.
He also maintained that the US was once again trying to return to a policy of containing Russia.
“After toppling the Taliban regime in Afghanistan, the United States started a series of unilateral actions,” Mr Medvedev said.
- A d v e r t i s e m e n t
“As a result, a trend appeared in international relations towards creating dividing lines. This was in fact the revival of a policy popular in the past and known as containment.”
While he called for a cooling of the noxious rhetoric that had blighted East-West relations over the past two years, Mr Medvedev clearly laid the blame for the deterioration on the US, which he said was again viewing Russia through the prism of the Cold War. “Sovietology, like paranoia, is a very dangerous disease, and it is a pity that part of the US Administration still suffers from it,” he said.
In order to end the “unipolar” model in which the world depended on the US, he proposed creating new financial systems to challenge the dominance of the International Monetary Fund and the World Trade Organisation, both of which had fallen under Washington’s spell.
Attacking the enlargement of NATO, which he said had advanced provocatively towards Russia, he proposed a new European security treaty.
The new European pact would include “a clear affirmation of the inadmissibility of the use of force – or the threat of force – in international relations” and would be built on the principle of the territorial integrity of independent nations.
While Russia has insisted it was not intending to supplant NATO, Mr Medvedev made it clear that the US-dominated alliance was partly responsible for the war in the Caucasus by its failure to rein in Georgian “aggression”.
|
-
- Social bookmarks
- Email this article
-
- Print this page
- Share on Twitter
October 10th, 2008 at 1:52 am
“The new European pact would include “a clear affirmation of the inadmissibility of the use of force – or the threat of force – in international relations” and would be built on the principle of the territorial integrity of independent nations.”
That sounds great indeed. But be careful anyway. Don’t allow centralization of power.
Anything that destroys Rockefeller’s and Rothschild’s dreams must be good though.
October 10th, 2008 at 2:45 am
Many people stated here that Russia is against the NWO – I have known that they are for it and there it is.
What a world it is we live in
October 10th, 2008 at 2:56 am
I agree Damir, and they are trying all angles to start a one world government.
October 10th, 2008 at 8:42 am
The NWO is and always has been powerful accumulators of wealth and control that act in their own interests and sell their product for profit in the form of “concern for the best for humanity”… the price tag.. perpetual wars that keep them in money and subsequently power.
October 10th, 2008 at 9:13 am
Being one to suggest Russia was opposed to the America and NATO, this is an interesting development. I am seeing several possible scenarios.
1. The Russian are aware of the NWO and are attempting to resist it.
2. The Russian fraction of the elites are attempting to exclude the Angle American elites from world control. This would become a European / Asian axis of power.
3. This latest move by Russia is part of the NWO plot, where the United States is seen as the enemy which other countries around the world must unite to fight. This could eventually see the release of information which links the United States to 9/11.
4. The United States fraction of the NWO has wasted to much money and now the creditors are having a coup against the American cartel.
Any thoughts?
October 13th, 2008 at 10:00 pm
Yeah Russia is ‘AWARE’ of the NWO Zionists – theay just happend to have murdered the Russian Monarchy and take over their country and turn it into a Communist Hell hole visa vi the Bolshevik revolution wich desimated the population by 10s -100s’of millions … that kind of reputation would be very hard to shake !!! … any sane country would exact revenge if at all possible , me thinks that is why todays Zionists are quite affraid of Old Russia repowering and hold them to acount !! .. as a US citizen I DO NOT back Israel or the Zionist scum !! … get out of my country you demons from hell !!
October 13th, 2008 at 10:11 pm
The Bolshevik Revolution was a Holocost beyond imagination perpetrated by the Zionist scum – The hight of hypocrasy is sickening !! … our whored out govt. officials/candidates always say we can’t allow another holocost but do not clarify if that includes the one(s) perpetrated on behalf of the Zionists ?? inquiring minds want to know !
October 14th, 2008 at 12:52 pm
damir and cascade are both correct, and 1776 is spot on. the csars were part of the nwo, and the zionists. i personally think there is one momment in russian history that really confirms this statement. in the early 1850’s the csar released the emancipation manifesto that freed the servant class of russia. the only problem was the csar didnt have a secondary plan for the millions of people now nationalized but with nowhere to go. this brought about the state of serbia. look at the name, if my russian is correct this translates into “the land of the servants”. now you have a secondary kind of state for these citizens that russia still controled with centralized power. this was a great set up to be able to manipulate these people. this also follows practically page for page, action for action the history of our country in the similar decades. and if you look at the generalized treatment of these servant classes of people in both of these countries it will be very, very similar. from accessability to education, finances, housing, etc,etc.