Once on the Mike Reagan Show, Mike Reagan was really criticizing Clinton for his lying and denying what happened when he had sex / adultery with Monica. I called in to say that rather than lying like a lawyer to say that he (Clinton) can’t remember when he could indeed remember what happened or to say that it depends on what the meaning of the work is is, that Clinton would have done better to wiggle out of it like another scandal-ridden president in a sticky situation who was being asked about a highly significant event in the Iran-Contra Scandal when instead of answering the question he just responded with another question by asking the reporters a question about a very insignificant matter, “Well! … Can you remember what you had for lunch yesterday?” Ronald Reagan then paused briefly for a response to this unexpected question that he raised. When they were not able to quickly answer the question, he then quickly added, “Well! … You see, that’s just my point! If you can’t remember what you had for lunch yesterday, how do you expect me to remember what something that happened many months ago!?” This was a clever way out of giving an answer – honest or dishonest. Reagan avoided the question completely, even though he had lied to the American people on other occasions about events in Central America and about U.S. government involvement there to help prop up the drug-running Contra hoodlums, death squads, and terrorists. El Salvador was known for the death squads but the Nicaraguan Contras acted the same – with brutality toward combatants and civilians (non-combatants) alike. It is known that terrorists target both combatants and non-combatants, depending on how easy of a target they want to hit. Reagan was also good friends with Iraq’s Sadam Hussein and Sadam’s death squad government who Reagan also supported regardless of the lack of human rights and liberty that characterized Sadam’s rule from beginning to end.

( Both Clinton and Reagan were called the “Great Communicators”. They were both Great evaders of the truth. I think Reagan was a little better at it, making him an even greater “Communicator”. ) A thoughtful person noted that “When Clinton lied, no one died.” You can’t make that statement about Reagan. Reagan supported brutal regimes, drug runners, and terrorists who were worse than any East German border guards whom he preached against, and worse than the British colonial rulers who caused people to revolt and throw them out in order to form a new country – the U.S.A. For a reminder of how brutal the British rulers were in the 1770s, one need only watch the movie, “The Patriot” starring Mel Gibson.

Mike Reagan didn’t want to hear this and I was hung up on when he heard me suggest that his dad, Ronnie, was even better at evading the truth with the example I gave between Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton trying to evade the truth.  I suggested that Bill Clinton should have used the same lines that his step dad Ronald Reagan used to evade the truth by asking the reporters what they had for lunch yesterday and then saying that if they can’t remember what they had for lunch yesterday, then how can they expect him to remember something that happened many months ago.

The truth hurts, doesn’t it Mike? It only hurts buffoons and fools who think that a scandal-ridden president like Ronald Reagan (who props up bloody death squads, and drug-running terrorists and tells stupid lies to the American people against all common sense about what was happening in Central America) should somehow be on the Eisenhower Dollar instead of Eisenhower. Eisenhower was the greatest Republican President of the century. He was pretty much a scandal free President who warned us against trusting the likes of the Military-Industrial Complex, not to mention the CIA who misled people into supporting a military dictatorship in Guatemala in a 1954 coup-d’etat. Eisenhower was a great liberator during WWII, and a real military officer – the top commanding officer with five stars, unlike someone who only pretended to be a military officer – a Captain in a movie, “The Santa Fe Trail”. All those blind Ronald Reagan loving fools don’t want to pull their heads out or to wake up and smell the coffee or what ever they would smell after they pull their heads out.
The blind Ronald Reagan loving fools all think their crap don’t stink. Fortunately, they are a real minority.

Might I add another title for the greatest Republican President of the last century, “Supreme Allied Commander”. He had five stars, he wasn’t someone reading a script on how to pretend to be an Army Captain in the movie, “The Sante Fe Trail”. - Anyone who suggests that Ronald Reagan should be depicted on the Eisenhower Dollar instead of Eisenhower or on any coins and paper money or on Mount Rushmore or anywhere of dignity like this is just as drugged up as the Fifth Amendment druggie, Rush Limbaugh and all of his wanna-bees. I always thought that if Limbaugh wasn’t on drugs that he ought to be. It turned out later that Rush Limbaugh was indeed on drugs. Although he earlier said on his show that anyone caught illegally using drugs should be prosecuted to the full extent of the law, when he (Limbaugh himself) got caught illegally using drugs, he didn’t throw himself on the exuberance of the court to really give it to him because he’s as guilty as a cat with feathers on its chin and then explain how guilty he was. No, No, No. Instead Limbaugh became the Fifth Amendment Druggie. Did you know that Limbaugh also used to be on the dough – sucking up welfare and leaving his first wife to be the bread winner while he (Limbaugh) refrained from working and aimed instead at getting welfare assistance? This fact is listed in the book, “Rush Limbaugh is a Big Fat Idiot”. The book was written by Al Franken and it sure caused Rush Limbaugh to go on a frantic crash diet and loose his fat. Rush Limbaugh still hasn’t lost his idiocy and he never will. Now he is just a Big Idiot and not a fat one. Did you know that Limbaugh has lost even more wives than fat? I lost count on which wife he is married to now. I think it is number four or five. Al Franken is still married to his first wife and leads a much better life.

 A caller to a night time radio talk show on a big 50,000 watt AM radio station – KSL in Salt Lake City – once said that unlike Clinton, Ronald Reagan was loyal to his wife. To this the radio talk show host asked, “Which wife? – the first wife or the second wife?” He was clearly a level headed talk show host and not some Rush Limbaugh wanna-bee.

Funny that Radio America is conveniently based in Arlington, VA where all those CACI, INC.-FEDERAL contractors hang out.

Reagon is pulling the same stunt Glen Beck pulled when Ron Pauls supporters went to bat against Beck’s threats. Just like Glen Beck when he had Ron Paul for purpose of apologizing, Reagon used the Psy Op of giving the public the idea that the Truth Patriots (a.ka. “Homegrown Terrorists”) harrassed him by getting/calling his cell phone, coming over to his house ad nauseam. PsyOp Message to all Reagon’s listeners: “Truthers/Freedom Lovers are dangerous/possible homegrown terrorists.”

Everything: setup and arrests of any group who dissents, targeting as dangerous, recent burning of Texas Govt. Mansion, the bought and paid for Talk Show Host Shills spewing the Clarion call for our murder, the media blackout of these criminal acts toward us are for one Purpose: That purpose is:

HR 1955 Violent Radicalization and Homegrown Terrorism

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v.....re=related

PLEASE WATCH THIS VIDEO ON YOU TUBE. It says it all. This Bill has been sitting in Committee for a year now. The Senate is drooling over it, just waiting to pass it. Unless we ALL call Congress every single day to object, this will be the end of ALL who’ve been telling the truth and any dissent. Is our freedom worth a few daily phone call?

Believe me, Reagon didn’t have Dice on to apologize. He had him to build his own case, and to lure Dice into saying something….anything…that could be twisted into painting truthers as dangerous and treasonous “homegrown” terrorists.

Well, this will no doubt breed a flurry of blogs and YouTube posts. I have no comment other than what is written here. When the time comes to purge this country of criminals like this – my combat veteran friends and I got sumthin’ fo-ya’…. We are ready for our names to be written in the history books of the future. It’s coming, folks! I regret that I have but ONE life to give for my country.

Washington, D.C.
The “D.C.” stands for “District of Criminals”

Steven Jones, Physicist for 911 and Karen Johnson, Arizona Senator for 911 Truth (both Mormons) are important advocates for this movement–I’m pretty sure they don’t think Satan is a “Savior.” Alex seems to be looking for ways to snatch defeat from the jaws of victory–Why does Alex want to shoot himself in the foot like that?

I want to support Alex Jones and I believe in most of what he says but he has some Achilles Heels that most likely derive from inexperience and youth. It makes me question the other things he says–I know he’s not perfect but why not leave legitimate religions out of this and not play on both sides of the fence? Same goes to Mark Dice who lists a link to Professor Steven Jones’ information on his website.