The Daily Galaxy
October 1, 2009
New Footage above of the moment the second plane crashed into the World Trade Centre on September 11, 2001,has been released. These new images are just a few minutes among hundreds of hours of amateur video and images being collected by the National September 11 Memorial and Museum at the World Trade Center which has launched a website containing examples of citizen journalism of the tragedy.
“9/11 was probably the most widely documented event in modern history, witnessed by literally billions of people in real time, around the world,” said Memorial Museum Director Alice Greenwald.According to today’s press release the museum has issued a world-wide invitation for the public to submit media related to the 9/11 events through a new online initiative “Make History.”
911History.org will become a permanent digital archive and help build an interactive, mapped time line of events on the web.
9/11 Memorial and Museum President Joe Daniels said, “Public participation is critical to building the historical record of the events of 9/11.”
Each photo will be placed alongside current Google “Street View” photos of various locations. Users can click on locations, themes or time of day to view the footage or images from the locations they were actually taken.
Research related links
© 2010 Alex Jones | Infowars.com is an Alex Jones company. All rights reserved.
Home » September 11 » New Footage of the 9/11 WTC Attack

October 1st, 2009 at 3:48 pm
Oh, and keep posting those obama / joker posters and flu poster posters…. I heard Obama was getting mad and put Alex on a list…. Mind as well put us all on the list hmm?
InvestigatEverything Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 3:57 pm
Paperwork flying down like snowflakes thousands of yards away, and yet they found the passport of the highjackers in the debri… what a joke.
InvestigatEverything Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 4:00 pm
Interestingly, that flash that can be seen just before the plane enters the building on other videos can be seen on this one as well… and the plane looks grey or green in this vid, not white… like military colors.
Chris Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 4:14 pm
Exactly, This is the clearest video yet of the plane and the flash just prior to the plane hitting. It is clearly a grey plane with no markings. Everybody should download this video immediately.
Vote Third Party Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 4:43 pm
Someone should slow this down frame by frame to see if there really was a flash. I cant see it.
http://www.Vote3rdPartyNow.org
Come & Take it Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 5:01 pm
Can someone educate me on the finer points of downloading and burning DVDs? Seriously, it must be a generational gap thing, I cannot do it.
Click my name & email me please.
Thanks!
showmebby Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 5:05 pm
PLEASE TELL ME SOME ONE ELSE SEES THE BUILDING PAINTED WITH THE LASER JUST BEFORE THE PLANE HITS. Watch it again. you hear the plane… she zooms in… the “paint” starts from the left hand side of the building, and moves right and drops several floors….. The plane hits almost exactly were the mark is… OMG that is the best evidence yet.
InvestigatEverything Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 5:28 pm
The flash is definitely there. I had to hit play/pause play/pause over and over again and one of the times it stopped right on it… the flash is def. there, right before it hits.
To Showmebby Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 5:30 pm
Hey Showmebby, don’t start some bulls--- conspiracy, this video already put two conspiracies, the hologram and no plane theory, into the trash can. Don’t come here starting another one jackass.
Colonel Ingus Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 6:38 pm
Uh, you must be watching a different video. Do it frame-by-frame, and you can clearly see there was no explosion until after the plane, or halogram, or cruise missle, or marshmallow peep bunny slammed into the building. As far as gray planes go, American Airline planes ARE gray. When anything is travelling 600 miles an hour, it becomes a bit tough to see detail like it’s tail number. Use some common sense man!
OOPS! Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 7:21 pm
No doubt it’s a grey primered plane no markings,very low reflection from plane and sun is just right to have great light reflection but no it’s flat grey primer. Serious “pod”
shows reflection on lower right side near rear of “pod” and “engines” have reflection
somewhat. And no commercial airlines paint passenger planes flat grey……Not even AA
paints them flat grey….
Julian Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 7:32 pm
Michael Moore’s a big fat Commie.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UBmWCMGmOWs
jt Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 8:45 pm
Its not a painted target. Its a piece of paper coming down from the first tower. I still believe the planes were remote controlled mil planes tho.
de obvious Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 9:49 pm
SHowmebby – I see paper floating acroos that face of the building. I’m no expert but the laser used for “painting” is not in the visible light spectrum from what I understand.
I WANT to see it, but I just don’t.
100% Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 11:42 pm
It’s crystal clear; the laser makes a slow arc across the face of the building just before the airplane comes into view and collides with the facade! I had heard about this but in the video it becomes undeniable. THIS AIRPLANE WAS A LASER-GUIDED BOMB no more-no less.
Jim Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 12:42 am
Here. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v.....84E26F7CFB
Thorne in Their Side Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 2:17 am
Actually, there is a marking on the tail rudder, I can’t make it out though, it is too pixelated! But it is definetly there. I have never seen a supposedly white plane look grey in broad daylight before either! But the marking is about 1/4 of the way down from the tip of the rudder, it isn’t like a commercial marking though! In shape, it is almost like an airforce insignia. You HAVE to use a magnifying glass to see it right though! It is hard to get it to stop just before it goes into the building!
MARIA Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 2:25 am
Colonel Ingus >>>>>>>>>>> The plane was NOT going 600 mph…..it’s not an F14, relax, it was reported going around 490mph. And AA planes are SILVER !!!!! NOT grey !!!! (here, enjoy: http://www.google.com/search?h.....qi=g2g-m6)
Wayland Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 4:30 am
Just as the nose of the plane enters the building there is a crashing ‘cashinggggg’ sound which accompanies the passage of the plane through the building.
This seems natural enough since we have seen plenty of movies where you hear the sound of the crash. However I would say the WTC towers are at least 2000metres away. They have 400 metres tall so how many times could you lay them flat until they reached the camera position?
We can hear the double boom of the explosion a good 10 seconds after we see the explosion.
The speed of sound is 343 metres per second so 10 seconds time 343 is 3.43km away, would you agree?
So what is that rather satisfying crashing sounds that accompanies the aircraft crash?
If it’s from the towers then it’s a good 10 seconds before we see the plane. Has it been added afterwards to make it seem more real?
is this proof we can’t trust YouTube?
Crito Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 1:34 pm
The flash is clearly there. The nose cone of a commercial plane wouldn’t have caused a static discharge as the al-Quider conspiracy nuts claim and it certainly isn’t hard enough to penetrate through the entire building.
That was a military airplane with an incendiary device attached beneath it. There can be no debate. Anyone who believes otherwise is just plain stupid.
Fox-Spirit Reply:
October 4th, 2009 at 10:25 am
Who really gives a s--- what was on the planes? I think that in an investigation, the fact of the nano-thermite makes for an easier conviction. It’s a difficult to create substance. My presumption is, is that each developer of nano-thermite roughly follows their own specific recipe. With the samples of both undetonated and detonated samples of nano-thermite compared chemically against each developer and their processes for making the substance we should be able to get a finger in the right direction.
Of course, one of the strongest cases against them is the pentagon attack and how none of the witnesses back up the gov’s story. Hell, the fact that they are now not even backing up their own story shows that their little men are starting to panic. They flee like roaches when you flip the lights on.
- Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 4:19 pm
The NO PLANE or cartoon plane theory goes up in smoke!
Reuters:
China modified weather for 60th anniversary
http://in.reuters.com/article/.....5120091001
Solutions Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 5:47 pm
According to the Harbor Patrol, referred to a Marine 6, they confirmed the plane was a light green type of military craft and this film footage seems to bear that out.
According to the audio that I heard from that morning in the news, Marine 6 said, “thats affirmative, it was a light green bomber military craft that flew into the tower.” I believe he was a former seal working as harbor patrol that morning and the plane flew right over their patrol boat.
Stuff like that is really troubling for anyone that remembers what was actually said by so many witnesses. I belive it was also Mark Burnback from Fox news that was live that morning and he said, “the plane was not like any other plane he had ever seen in the area, it had no windows and had a round circular logo near the front of the plane.” Fox’s news room responded with, “Mark do you think it was a cargo plane?”
IMO, I can’t imagine a former seal or a news man that travels for a living being so wrong as to make the statements they made that morning, that so many of us heard and still remember.
This only scratches the surface.
The white dot moving across the face of the tower could be a piece of debris, but it also looks like a laser guiding marker, And then there is the flash just before the plane hits and all of this should be investigated by professionals very closely. We got more close investigation of the space shuttle that burned up on reentry, including actual photos where the tiles supposedly failed at the landing gear hatch. THAT WAS BIG NEWS and are we to assume this is not when it’s changed America in a big way forever.
Solutions Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 5:55 pm
The NON CIVILIAN airliner theory goes up in smoke and the Operation Northwoods theory is looking more and more valid.
For anyone not familiar with Operation Northwoods, it comes from a declasssified document where our own Joint Chief had made plans with other high ups, to paint military craft and make them appear as civilian craft and switch them out while in flight and crash them to impersonate an attack by Castro, to justify the invasion of Cuba. Kennedy put an end to it and pissed off many in high places.
billy the kid Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 12:11 am
its a paper not a laser i work with lasers, do you think the government would use a primerd plane ,it was remote controlled i think?? no plane at the pentagon tho unless they show us better video!
. Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 12:47 am
The plane is gray, not green.
BTW here is the wreckage of a GRAY fuselage
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wi.....debris.jpg
mp Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 12:09 pm
the HIJACKED PLANES theory goes up in smoke!!!
camera planet???
f i l t h y s c u m!
this ‘airplane’?
C G I like all the others.
freeze it mid entry!!!!
WHAT A JOKE!
Frank Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 4:58 pm
Who has cameras that can zoom three and one half miles…citizens or gov ops? Why does one more CG film convince you and the rest on this board to argue over colors and other crap?
If the so-called history people want to create a museum, why work with CIA/Google?
And BTW, since Adobe has control now of almost every damn video I find, my Mac hates it and the vid stalls and sputters, so while it was starting up there was a dot on the side of the building, guess it is the “flash” mentioned here and I thought that was supposed to be the “new evidence.”
chaostheory Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 8:14 pm
i thought this was a united airlines flight, their planes are grey.
freedomlover Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 6:31 pm
YOU IDIOTS….. THAT’S NOT A LASER!!!!! That’s a piece of debris being carried by the wind from Worl Trade Center I. The wind whips around the second building.
COME ON!!!!!!
No Laser Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 8:35 pm
I used to work with military lasers and just to let everyone know they are not visible to the naked eye. It takes tracking hardware to pick up the laser “splash”. The laser splash will blind or burn you though.
billy the kid Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 12:14 am
also military uses I.R. infer red lasers for rang and its invisible to the human eye!
Wayland Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 4:34 am
Laser not visible to the naked eye? Well this was a camera not an eye. The TV remote control LED is not visible to the nakid eye. Try looking at it through a digital camera whilst pressing the buttons. Visible on most but not all digital cameras.
Also what is that sound as the plane crashes through the building. Think before you answer.
someguy Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 10:09 am
right on wayland I was just about to explain this. Most digital cameras pick this up some don’t have the right filters. I also remember seeing another video that picked it up, and it tracks all the way down the building, disappears then reappears on the next building.
NAKED EYE RETARDS
info Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 12:40 pm
it actually just looks like the reflection from the sun off of the planes windows
Crito Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 2:02 pm
They’re not idiots, they’re intentionally feeding the public misinformation to divert attention away from the irrefutable facts and unanswerable questions.
hellhound55 Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 11:07 pm
that plane did not look like any commercial airliner – the color was not any airline that is recognizable – these were supposed to be well known airliners – no markings visible – very strange!
Kahoki Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 8:21 am
If you pause the video just before impact. You see the United logo on the tail. It is not a military jet.
SoonaOrlata Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 11:25 am
http://911review.com/errors/phantom/flash.html talks about the flash …sounds reasonable…doesnt mean nothin screwy happenned that day though
Crito Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 2:08 pm
Real pilots and aeronautical engineers have debunked that misinformation.
Commercial airplane nose cones are designed of a composite material specifically so they’re lightweight and can’t ignite jet fuel.
jed hudson Reply:
October 3rd, 2009 at 6:08 pm
At the start of the video you can see what appears to be a white missile heading straight at the building, possibly fired by the plane. This missile hits the building before the plane and appears to cause the fireball before the plane hits the building.
liam Reply:
October 9th, 2009 at 9:48 am
This is not a new video. Plus, all you experts commenting and arguing that you are the authority on what this video shows and doesnt show… give it up fools. What many are saying is a paper debris are wrong. That is a laser or some kind of light that slowly drifts from the center of the tower to the right as the plane approaches. There is no way that is paper. That same light or laser can be viewed on at least 5 of the other videos of the 2nd plane. Also each video of the 2nd crash shows totally different colors, speed, sound, size, shading, and more differences of the plane. THis video is highly doctored. You can tell from the audio alone. Listen to the crash. THis video was released quite a while ago.
All that matters is that 9-11 wasn’t what we were told. The exact nature of the attack is not important. The end result, who was involved and who profited are more important. The simple fact that 8 of the hijackers are alive and the FBI acknowledged this yet never changed the photo of the 19 hijackers is enough. QUit wasting time on how the towers fell and the exact nature of the planes.
mersie Reply:
October 6th, 2009 at 11:42 pm
Yep, if you get it just right, you can see the flash. Not a commercial flight either! Almost missed the building too. Laser guided maybe…they have drones all over in Afghanistan.
Markibari Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 4:11 pm
YOU HAVE TO PAUSE THE VIDEO before the “PLANE” hits the building. AND look exactly at the front “tIP” of the “PLANE”…………….A COMMERCIAL PLAIN IS NOT POINTI…..
gforce9 Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 5:25 pm
I did and it comes to a very sharp point, also the color of that plane is not right.
eyeinthesky Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 4:34 pm
whats the thing moving on the building right where the plane hits
gforce9 Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 5:06 pm
In this video it looks like paper. But in other videos there is a laser light that shines thru even the thickest of smoke.
To gforce9 Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 5:31 pm
Hey gforce9, don’t start some bulls--- conspiracy, this video already put two conspiracies, the hologram and no plane theory, into the trash can. Don’t come here starting another one jackass.
Crito Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 1:53 pm
Disinfo agents talking to themselves again!
There’s only one valid theory: those were military planes with incendiary devices attached beneath and the building were brought down by a controlled thermite demolition. Everything else you hear, lasers, no planes, UFOs, is designed to divert your attention away from the irrefutable facts and unanswerable questions. Commercial planes don’t have hardened nose cones that detonate incendiary pods PERIOD. And if all that fire is from jet fuel how did so much of it make it all the way down to the lobby and blow it up?
The disinfo agents have to divert your attention away from these facts and questions because then it becomes apparent they’re the traitorous conspirators in all this.
jp Reply:
October 9th, 2009 at 7:12 am
Crito:
You got it.
I’m admiring your ability to identify the bullsh*tters.
Keep it up man, your contributions are welcome and appreciated.
9/11 was an inside job.
showmebby Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 5:06 pm
Laser guided system
Infoman Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 5:24 pm
Correct. A laser guided system can be clearly seen on the side of building before it hits. All IR light shows as white on IR sensitive video cameras. Just get your TV remote and try, you get the same effect.
CyBerndt Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 6:33 pm
I believe the the white flash is just a reflection as it is moving the same speed as the plane is. It does not look like a commercial plane. It does resemble a military plane. pause the video at 00:06 you will it has a pointed nose and the flashing light is right where the right side of the wing is.
Tommy D Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 10:32 pm
I saw that too but can’t be sure its not paper debris from first building.
Captain Lizardo Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 12:57 am
It’s is obviously a reptilian death ray shot from their invisible flying saucer.
Crito Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 1:56 pm
Your mommas ass can clearly be seen traveling across 42nd street prior to the planes hitting.
Obviously Osama pulled this off by scribbling plans on the dirt floor of a cave.
NASH Reply:
October 6th, 2009 at 11:05 am
I’m wasn’t sure about the laser or not…but it certainly looks as if it is something other than a piece of paper…if you look later in the video as the lady filming it pans around at pieces of paper falling they take a long time to descend to ground level this “thing” appears to follow a straight path of descent across the bulidings and rapidly
gforce9 Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 5:28 pm
I looked at the video again and the white thing floating looks like paper. But if you look at the other building next to it you will see a light start out at the third building to the right and then move to the next building then onto the tower just below the impact I seen the first light at 002- then 003 on next building then travel to tower by 005.
CyBerndt Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 6:51 pm
If you look at this video you will not see the light
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4q5nE-k0tUQ
People claim that most videos you see have been altered. This one looks like the real deal.
billy the kid Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 12:15 am
falling paper..
skulb Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 8:23 pm
How dare you question the findings of the infallible Kean-Hamilton comission?
krid Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 11:38 am
Obama Put Alex On a List! Feds put Honest Militia’s on a List, PPL that Question the Government about 9-11 on a list! and I am making a new list myself, of every memeber of congress and the white house and ever political player, that refutes, blatently denies, and tries to cover up the truth of 9-11 (or ignores the issue) so… why don’t you make a list too and collect evidence aginst them because if we get the country back somebodys gonna have to take them all to justice, via court or whatever just means we establish. this is a crime, to deny the attack on 9-11 as far bigger than planes hitting buildings… this is not just a crime, this is treason! HIGH f---ING TREASON by none other than PRESIDENT OBAMA
Rednek Reply:
October 6th, 2009 at 9:25 pm
First of all, if it was a piece of paper. you would have excellent vision since it would only be the size of 1/64th the size of a window. I did the frame by frame and could see the projectile right as it hit. I ran it again and caught it right as it penetrated and could see the side of the building as it started to break outwards prior to the explosion. If I recall from the original footage when it happened. You can see the projectile coming from behind the 1st building and there is a boom. It’s a Damn shame the government we support has turned into a self-proclaimed Dictatorship. And the bad thing is we have allowed it, and it is almost to late to do anything about it. Now as for it being a Military issued projectile, All I can say is they did it in the 60’s and got away with it, and they’ll continue to get away with their political crimes till the “American People” take a stand and make our government responsible for their actions. But it will take everyone. What has happened to
“UNITED WE STAND”
I don’t care what color, religion, or what hand he/she jerks of with. All that matters is when he/she is playing in my yard, they need to present themselves like
“Great Americans”
GOD BLESS US ALL and have mercy on their souls
Charlie Reply:
October 8th, 2009 at 3:57 pm
You guys are all idiots. There is no laser or explosion before the plane hits. The entire plane is inside of the building before anything explodes. You should all be ashamed of yourselves. Get out of your moms basement and get a job.
sb Reply:
October 11th, 2009 at 1:32 am
single biggest lie ive ever heard
Ben Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 4:03 pm
6.5 billion people are on the list.
DissentFromDayOne Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 4:38 pm
That, my friend, is the post of the day!
Solutions Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 6:15 pm
You’re right, 6.5 billion people are on the list and do I need to point out that it strognly appears that eithier by pandemic – man made with a gene spliced virus, or by a live DNA vaccine, a real lot of people are going to be killed in the near future. They may also use the selective service to select those they want to get rid of first, based upon records, genome, one’s history and profile, think about that and watch out for a mandatory vaccine and a mandatory war, that gets used to covertly cull the population.
You can tell because the money is not there and other plans have obviously been made, from health care to social security, to jobs and on and on, our futures and entitlements are vanishing for a reason. They are counting the chickens before they hatch, or should I say the plans certainly appear there will be many less chickens in the very near future. Like we are going to play musical chairs with 100 chairs and with 1000 people. What is up with that, considering our maximum GNP, the budget and our debt, as it’s being played?
billy the kid Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 12:17 am
im on it!! lol we all are,,,papers we don’t need no stinking papers!
Informant Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 4:54 pm
Maybe Alex Jones is just a magnetic tool for the CIA to pull out under their “All Seeing Eye” all of the anti-globalist citizens, as well as militia members and member of law enforcement and government who are anti-NWO. Citizens whose trust he’s gained over many years.(These people are known to plan events 10, 20 + years ahead) Maybe the anti-NWO Truth Movement would have bloomed out into the open of everyone’s view anyways, without Alex Jones being “the founder” of the movement (his words, not true). Maybe true grassroot patriot movements would be exposing all of this information now anyways. Like ones led and inspired by William Cooper*, who condemned Alex as a fear mongering phoney and was later assassinated at his own home by police.
skulb Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 8:37 pm
I`m pretty sure I`ve seen AJ interview Bill Cooper somewhere on Youtube, and they seemed friendly to me. If any of them was fear mongering it was Cooper who at the time claimed 2nd amendment rights and said the feds would have to `shoot him to get his guns.`
I guess they did.
In any case I haven`t heard AJ say a negative word about any of the oldtimers, be it Cooper, J Maxwell or anyone else. After having paid attention to Jones since his Black Helicopter days all I have ever seen from him is outstretched hands to anyone who opposes despotism, whether he agrees with them or not.
If he was a fear monger he would incite divisions between subgroups of society, for example by stirring up whites against hispanics, liberals against conservatives etc. But he never does that. He tries to unite people and stir up everyone against the opression of the central banks, something which is long overdue imo.
Just because the truth is scary doesn`t mean the person telling you the truth is fear mongering.
Anyway, if you hurry you might be able to see the interview of Cooper before the Hope Pope censors the web. We wouldn`t want any complicated information to reach the public, now would we?
wanda Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 8:47 pm
WHY did my posts get deleted to this statement???? And REPLACED by one that was PRO- Alex Jones?????
You just revealed the truth to me about this man.
Thank you.
I needed to know the truth.
Gotcha.
FightOrDie!!! Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 9:57 pm
skulb – Youtube: “William ( Bill ) Cooper exposes Jesuit-CIA scaremonger Alex Jones.”
wanda Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 8:39 pm
YOU HAVE A GOOD POINT, DUDE….. like my brother says “anyone who is or was a TRUE conspiracy theorist and a TRUE patriot IS DEAD, because they were a very real threat to the NWO: JFK, RFK, William Cooper, Ron Brown, Martin Luther King, Jr, Michael Ruppert (poisoned into silence)….and many others. ”
REAL THREATS TO THE NWO ARE DEAD.
NON THREATS TO NWO ARE ALLOWED TO BABBLE ON BECAUSE THEY SERVE A PURPOSE.
Remember that.
wanda Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 8:44 pm
stop worrying about conspiracies and the NWO and start focusing on GOD, His WORD, and His Son JESUS CHRIST so you can be raptured OUT of this HELL-HOLE, and won’t have to worry about microchips, or vaccines, or fascism or anything else!!!!!
Leave that stuff for HEATHENS to deal with – let them suffer through an ANTI-CHRIST ruled Apocalyptic existence, while you are chillin’ in heaven with a front row seat!!!
??? Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 10:21 pm
wanda – Who told you that Michael C. Ruppert was dead? He left the US forever because felt he was going to be assassinated. He’s in Venezuela. Here: http://www.vheadline.com/readnews.asp?id=84339
Sparky Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 7:15 pm
She’s a jebus freak thus obviously weak-minded so it is no wonder that she has no clue.
Dic Thesaurus Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 11:13 pm
informant means snitch
Mystery Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 5:02 pm
This is not new footage, its in the documentary September Clues. Look at the small dot that scrolls along the side of the building before the plane hits.
arno Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 8:40 am
true – this is NOT NEW VIDEO…I HAVE SEEN THIS FOOTAGE MANY MANY MANY TIMES OVER
Alpha Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 6:13 pm
Whats that little glowing light that goes in before the plane but it moving to slowly for anything sinister
Corporate Death Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 6:27 pm
Did everyone see the laser guide on the side of the building. Hmmmmmmm……
Corporate Death Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 6:34 pm
Oh, maybe it is paper.
Welshman[UK] Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 4:05 am
lol…… NOT!!
sdfgsdf Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 9:11 pm
After watching this I can see a double-layered backdrop. They took footage and then relayered themselves on it. They might have had the right intent, but this is a fraud hurting the REAL CAUSE.
NewWorldDisOrder Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 10:23 pm
The camera angle clearly reveals the spotter’s laser on the side of the building before impact of the jet, just as explained by Field McConnell in the film ‘Captain Sherlock Solves 9/11′.
dubsqued Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 1:51 am
listen you guys, if anyone here has seen the john leer interview with project camelot, and heard the holagram theory, ( and he kinda know’s what he’s talking about when it comes to planes ) it kinda makes sense if you watch again jus try and imagin what if it was, i’m not saying it is, jus veiw the thing with an unbias opinion, if something i.e plane smashed into the building at 600mph or whatever speed it would be travelling, don’t you think it would have smashed through the building and fallen to the ground??.. jus throwing that out there for you to ponder?
Sparky Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 7:20 pm
No you fool. the “hologram” theory is counter intelligence put out there by the government shills to ridicule the truth movement and divert attention from the real exposing evidence.
those buildings were super strong and had over 80 massive structural steel columns to support it.
A plane is made up of mostly a fairly fragile aluminum skin and in no way would “smash through”structural steel. These buildings were designed to withstand multiple hits from the largest plane flying at the time of construction, and these planes weren’t much different.
Luke Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 3:11 am
This video report explains that laser pretty good. Creepy.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dr4BJ89Df5Q
Michael Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 3:14 am
Just get your damn vaccine.
F ck Stupid Michael! Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 12:23 pm
Why don’t you get yours asshole?
britman Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 3:54 am
is it just me or can anyone else see the dot traveling across the building when the camera zooms in? it’s also visible moving across the building next to it after the plane has crashed, looks like some sort of laser targeting to me….
Alex Jones Exposed!!! Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 4:23 am
Israel did 911.
and Alex Jones is programming you to ACCEPT that naming Israel is not helpful, so instead just say ‘leets’.
The MOSSAD and possibly *some* elements of CIA too was involved.
By way of deception you shall do war.
??? Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 4:19 pm
A.J.Ed!!! – Israel did 911??? I guess Israel also planned Operation Northwoods. lol…
Ksatria Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 9:44 am
WWHAT IS THAT SMALL FLASHING WHITE OBJECT SEEN FLOATING DOWN BEFORE THE PLANE HITS. RIGHT AT THE BEGINING. ? A BIRD OR WHITE TRASH BAG?
Ron Paul told the truth Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 10:29 am
goodnewsaboutgod.com by dr day
henrymakow.com
infowars.com
drtenpenny.com
fluscam.com
W Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 11:21 am
Pause this at 6 seconds and you can clearly see that there is no plane. If there was a plane there would be a explosion as soon as the plane hit and in this video the whole plane is in the building and no explosion?
Next, if there was a plane the holes in the building would be there as the plane is already inside, and you can clearly see the supposed plane is inside and the building is still in tact.
There were obviously explosives placed to outline where the plane was to enter WTC. It was a missle with a holographic outline of a plane, search project Blue Beam.
Red Dawn 09 Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 11:29 am
Put up all kinds of fliers. Alex only did the joker to show you that you do have the power to change peoples minds. Click my name for more information on todays hottest topics including swine flu,Ron Paul,Bilderberg and others. Movies,video’s,blog’s,text and when you cant cram anymore, Games. Updated daily and newly awakened patriots welcome.
kw Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 2:02 pm
Sure doesn’t look like a passenger jet. But, passengers were killed in the crash. Right?
Sparky Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 7:21 pm
What makes you say that?
The planes were most likely military drones. Nobody really knows what happened to the original passengers.
Dan Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 3:55 pm
in this video, did you notice the white spot going across the bldg just before the hit of the plane, could be a laser guide ??
the logic of truth Reply:
October 3rd, 2009 at 4:14 am
What People said ! ( 9/11)
U.S. Air Force fighter pilot, former instructor at the USAF Fighter Weapons School and NATO’s Tactical Leadership Program, with a 20-year Air Force career (Lt. Colonel Guy S. Razer) said the following:
“I am 100% convinced that the attacks of September 11, 2001 were planned, organized, and committed by treasonous perpetrators that have infiltrated the highest levels of our government ….
Those of us in the military took an oath to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic”. Just because we have retired does not make that oath invalid, so it is not just our responsibility, it is our duty to expose the real perpetrators of 9/11 and bring them to justice, no matter how hard it is, how long it takes, or how much we have to suffer to do it.
We owe it to those who have gone before us who executed that same oath, and who are doing the same thing in Iraq and Afghanistan right now. Those of us who joined the military and faithfully executed orders that were given us had to trust our leaders. The violation and abuse of that trust is not only heinous, but ultimately the most accurate definition of treason!”
the logic of truth Reply:
October 3rd, 2009 at 4:15 am
found that statement somewhere in the WEB !
jlbetsch Reply:
October 4th, 2009 at 5:32 pm
Ummm… Freeze the frame @ 6 seconds in and the plane it totally inside the building and no pre explosion. The plane has CLEARLY crashed first, then the explosion. ALSO, in regards to the color scheme on the plane looking different here. The camera person was down wind of the smoke from the first jet crash and there is def. a thick smokey haze. Also, the plane is on an angel when impacting the tower with a heavy sun reflection. Being a United Airlines flight, the color schemes of United Airlines was SILVER or GREY with Dark Blue under belly. NOT WHITE. Research that yourself. Sheesh… No offense, but your all a bunch of morons to say this is not a real passenger plane with REAL passengers on board. You want a conspiracy so badly that the truth is irrelevant.
Here is one final thought to all you “truthers” out there. I know this will get a beat down, cause of your irrational thoughts. It has been 8 years plus now. President Bush is out of office. Yet, NO ONE has stepped forward with ANY damaging evidence since Barack took office? That ALONE speaks volumes to the BS conspiracy.
Most of you probably called Bush a moron for during his 8 years in office, YET SOME HOW, He was Brilliant enough this ONE TIME to keep HUNDREDS of people involved in this conspiracy quiet for 8+ years… Well, which is it? President Reagan Clinton could not keep cabinet members from leaking stupid s--- out there, yet, the moron BUSH could keep every ones mouth shut for YEARS…
Flozone Reply:
October 5th, 2009 at 5:37 am
During the 4 second mark, there’s a frame that shows only the nose of the plane. I landed on it while trying to get a clear frame of the whole plane. Anywhooo, the nose of the plane is just far too narrow to be a commercial jet, and it’s such a clear image. I saw it just by pausing and playing and backing up and pausing again on youtube.
concerned mom Reply:
October 5th, 2009 at 9:57 am
I Think What I thought all along from Video “Both Planes hitting twin towers : Manned or Unmanned with explosives aboard detonated at exact time drew attention AWAY from Pentagon; personel were watching towers on televisions and getting calls not aware of real Al Quieda Target “Hi-Jacked Plane heading for REAL target Pentagon.” Our Avaiation laws state We can NOT use cell phones in air I think Al Quieda Or Hi-Jackers DID NOT EXPECT REAL AMERICANS TO BE REAL HEROS GIVING THEIR LIVES FOR OTHERS> just because we don’t practice suicide missions of self sacrafice does not mean our soliders and OUR PEOPLE are not willing to be self sacraficing.
erik Reply:
October 5th, 2009 at 6:02 pm
Pic of plane pre 9/11. Sorry, it’s not military.
http://www.airliners.net/photo/0188174/
erik Reply:
October 5th, 2009 at 6:04 pm
http://www.airliners.net/photo/0188174/
it’s the same plane…not a military plane. sorry.
Jayman Reply:
October 6th, 2009 at 12:16 pm
I see a flash either right when the plane hits or before…
As for the “painting by a military lazer” there is zero evidence at all regarding that. That is a piece of paper…it on the far left past the building…a lazer wouldn’t paint in thin air…you can see it move from left of the building and float down…
Illuminatiwantsmymindsoulandmybody Reply:
October 8th, 2009 at 2:00 pm
I don’t see any flash
Matt Reply:
October 9th, 2009 at 12:27 am
man am I disappointed. you people are seriously thinking this was a gov’t conspiracy?
It was a f’ing piece of paper. The military doesn’t use laser pointers like someone doing a presentaion. IT IS NOT VISIBLE. How stupid would it be for the military to use visible laser light to “paint” a target? Wouldn’t you think it would take away from the element of surprise?
BTW, do you realise the size and scope of a mission if this were government. How long this would have had to been planned? It would have had to been planned under CLinton and carried out under Bush. And you seriously think that many people can keep a secret that big for 8 years?
Damn, you are some seriously delussional people.
I had high hopes for this site. Very disappointing.
rapper Reply:
October 9th, 2009 at 4:16 pm
Looks like a drone or bird or something flying across the tower from right to left at 0.53 sec? Seems to be a bit fast for a bird?
October 1st, 2009 at 3:49 pm
Isn’t it strange that all “private” videos (and all others too of course) of the second hit are zooming in just seconds before the object hits the tower…. :-S
gforce9 Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 5:07 pm
I noticed that to. Even before the first plane hit it was like that. Looks like someone new what was going to happen before it did.
Crito Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 2:10 pm
They’re all al-Quider sleeper cell agents sent by Bin Laden to discredit the government.
HAlve Naught Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 5:32 pm
Have noticed that too many times b4. Prolly so that no one can see the near impossible angle of approach at speed the plane took, defying most (admittedly) experienced pilots.
October 1st, 2009 at 3:49 pm
wtc rip!! we will avenge you
October 1st, 2009 at 3:50 pm
wow
October 1st, 2009 at 3:50 pm
This guy deserves first-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KWu-efNN8PM
October 1st, 2009 at 3:50 pm
Still chilling watching it.
October 1st, 2009 at 3:51 pm
911 was an outside job
October 1st, 2009 at 3:53 pm
that was a different view for sure. the papers traveling that far was crazy.
http://www.spywitnessnews.org/node/483
October 1st, 2009 at 3:53 pm
is that from the white van???? almost same angle. watch core of corruption for more details on the tragedy of that day. ask questions demand the truth
October 1st, 2009 at 3:53 pm
I watched this a dozen times and I think without a doubt there is a beam guiding that plane. Watch the beginning very carefully, you can see a guided light slowly making its way across the building. It’s moving too slow to be a bird, and is it just a coincidence the plane hits the exact spot? Plus, the plane is too dark to be a commercial airliner.
Everyone, please record this one your cell phones and show this to everyone! RECORD THIS ON YOUR CELL PHONES.
JM needs to shutthehellup Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 4:00 pm
you f’king moron! that is a paper falling from the sky from the first building.
“I watched this a dozen times”, You are a tin foil hat wearing freak!
Calm down and take your meds you screwball. You give the truth a bad name you troll
nobody Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 4:25 pm
and if you stop it as the plane is entering the building, it hits directly at the tip of the wing. not paper.
jm Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 4:39 pm
ha ha people believe me and not you.
gforce9 Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 5:09 pm
I think it is paper too. But do you see a white commercial jet or a all dark colored jet?
freedomlover Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 11:01 pm
IT’S A UNITED AIRLINES JET!!!!!!!!! THEY WERE PAINTED DARK GRAY AND BLUE AT THE TIME OF 9/11….. AT LEAST 50,000 PEOPLE SAW THEM THE DAY IT HAPPENED!!!!!
DID THEY ALL WORK FOR THE CIA? or let me guess, two guys wearing black suits jumped out of a black van with a neuralizer and hypnotized people into seeing something that wasn’t true.
God you people piss me off!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Crito Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 2:16 pm
Bin Laden is a genius! Nobody else could have pulled this off by scribbling on the dirt floor of a cave.
concerned citizen of planet earth Reply:
October 8th, 2009 at 12:14 am
LOL
Actually Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 5:38 pm
Actually, that object that looks like a paper is too big to be a piece of paper. If it were a paper, it would be somewhere about 50 feet by 50 feet. That object is too big to be paper from that distance.
Buzz Hacksaw Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 5:58 pm
I Agree. For it to be that large it would have to be much much closer. It dissappears a hair before the jet hits.
Buzz
Corporate Death Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 6:29 pm
I’ve seen it from many angles. It is a laser guide IMHO.
stunned Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 4:02 pm
Yes, I too can see what looks like a laser dot tracking across the building meeting the plane at the point of impact.
Old Grump Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 4:09 pm
It’s the reflection of the plane in the glass as it’s approaching the building.
jm Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 4:41 pm
no it’s not, pause it at :06 you can see the plane is below the beam.
bullsh!t Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 4:04 pm
what is that beam? i see what you’re talkin about and it doesnt look like a bird or piece of paper
Infoman Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 5:28 pm
It’s a laser guided system for planes to hit there target. It can be clearly seen on the side of building before it hits. All IR light shows as white on IR sensitive video cameras. Just get your TV remote and try, you get the same effect.
brad Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 4:05 pm
Yes i noticed that white thing before the plane hit, as the plane was coming it moved toward the spot it was going to hit. It could of been the lights of the plane or someone inside.
nobody Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 4:23 pm
paper? That’s one big piece of paper. Stop the video at the frame with the plane and said “paper” are in frame. I think the wingspan of that plane is 150ft.? look how big the “paper” is.
Jonny Velocity Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 7:35 pm
The piece of paper isn’t right next to the WTC, dingus. Its floating away from it and is probably closer to the camera than it is to the plane.
gforce9 Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 5:11 pm
Who cares about the dot. The biggest thing is the jet and its color.
Actually Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 5:39 pm
It’s green and what major airline has a green plane? Not American nor United.
October 1st, 2009 at 3:53 pm
9/11 was an INSIDE JOB!!
October 1st, 2009 at 3:54 pm
This guy deserves first-
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KWu-efNN8PM
wasup Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 4:46 pm
stop spamming you son of the bitch what are you pregnant ?
October 1st, 2009 at 3:54 pm
Does anyone else notice that small white object that flies
into the tower just before the 2nd plane gets to it?
Drone? Tracking device? There is SOMETHING there.
Kirk Patrick Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 4:23 pm
This was shown previously in other videos that said it was laser guided. It is NOT a piece of paper that floated all the way around the building and happened to collide with the plane. There is no way amateur pilots could fly that fast and that accurately while making a turn. I’ve long believed it was laser guided. The other possibility is that it was a normal reflection but it seems too bright.
gforce9 Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 5:12 pm
That is not a commercial jet look at the color. That is the biggest piece of evidence.
Crito Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 2:18 pm
Does anyone notice the chain link fence needs to be painted? Did anyone notice the guy who didn’t tie his shoe laces? Did anyone notice the disinfo agents here trying to divert your attention away from what really matters?
October 1st, 2009 at 3:54 pm
If you watch closely, right before the 2nd plane goes into the tower, a spark goes off underneath it on the belly. This has already been widely reported in other videos, but the fact that it can be seen in this one as well further corroborates the story.
Crito Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 2:21 pm
YES!!! FINALLY SOMEONE WITH A BRAIN!
October 1st, 2009 at 3:56 pm
just a thought, but you know how fire works companies can make fire works show off various designs, like U.S.A. etc? What if the criminals intentionally made the smoke look like the devil? What sick psychos.
Lizard Tits Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 7:42 pm
I doubt they went to that trouble.
I’d rather think when he saw HIS KIDS blow up those buildings
and kill all those people, he was so pleased with their work
THE F*CKER SHOWED UP HIMSELF
October 1st, 2009 at 3:58 pm
The paper was unharmed so the pasport could be realy posible
FreedomFighter Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 4:28 pm
The Light on the tower that shows up is the reflection of the Airplane, which explains why it is visible at the point of impact, prior to the Plane coming into camera view. With today’s “smart bombs” It is not necessary to paint targets with a laser to guide them. A cruise missile (which can look like any Plane ie 747 ) Will have it’s flight plan pre programed to its guidance system and if needed remote controlled via satellite
FreedomFighter Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 4:41 pm
wrong reply above, ……………. The paper flying everywhere is from within the building and we can’t say from what floor it came ( i’m guessing not near the fire none of it is charred it is still white ). But the passport would have been inside the plane ensuring it to be exposed to fire. Remember the fire from the Pentagon was supposedly hot enough to vaporize the entire turbine ( no trace found other than a rotor which don’t come on those planes } which was made with titanium. I think the passport flying out of the plane, through a fire hot enough not only to melt, but to vaporize one of the most temperature resistant metals known to man is a hard sell.
Sparky Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 7:27 pm
No it is not “necessary” to use a laser but it is one of many ways to put a weapon on a target.
And this was not a cruise missile, this was a large plane.
jm Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 4:52 pm
true freedom fighter, I talked to someone who claimed that since a teddy bear was found that proves a pass port also could be found, but the paper could have come from a lower floor whereas the passport had to of been in the plane, engulfed in flame that was “so hot it melted the towers”
gforce9 Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 5:13 pm
to bad the asshole was found later alive in the mideast
Kojiro Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 5:17 pm
Those are office papers, not piloting papers.
Sparky Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 7:25 pm
The paper that you see flying around didn’t come from the inside of the plane you fool it came from the offices in the building.
The unburnt passport that they claimed to have found supposedly came from the alleged hijacker who was on the plane.
October 1st, 2009 at 4:00 pm
But does the new video prove anything? When do we get to see surveillence footage of the pen tagon attack?
*******************************************
Browse the web anonymously with http://ixkwik.net/
*******************************************
gforce9 Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 5:14 pm
it proves that it is not the plane they say hit
October 1st, 2009 at 4:02 pm
Wow, that beam is a laser used in the military to “paint a target” when guiding a missile or directing an air strike from a distant location, maybe that’s what the pod was for that was documented in 9-11 In Plane Sight… total inside job
FreedomFighter Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 4:56 pm
Cruise missiles do not rely on laser guidance. That technology was not suitable for this mission. The spot on the tower is the reflection of the plane which is why it shines at the point of impact. I’m am not trying to debunk anything, I know 911 was an inside job but these evil geniuses where not dumb enough to paint a target in front of 40+ million tv viewers. The fight plan could have been preprogramed or they could have simply flown it via satellite using a camera up front to visually see the target. Many rc planes are flown with a camera up front so you can have a pilot’s point of view.
October 1st, 2009 at 4:06 pm
pentagon it was a plane dropping guided bomb w/ du penetrator. and whats the latest conclusion with wtc – a missile inside a holographic plane or what
FreedomFighter Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 5:08 pm
It was a cruise missile that looked like a commercial plane, No holograms or anything to elaborate. It would have been a “real plane” retro fitted with a long range missile’s guidance system that would also contain a remote override, so that as the plane or missile approached the target a pilot could take over control ,via satellite and ensure a direct kit. This is how a predator drone works (among others) a predator drone can circle around in the air for hours on it’s own above a target, then when the remote pilot wants he can take over the controls and guide the drone into the target
October 1st, 2009 at 4:07 pm
is this plane a fake? look at left engine…
http://img245.imageshack.us/img245/4061/119ce.jpg
October 1st, 2009 at 4:07 pm
we must demand the footage of the “plane” that hit the pentagon. there is a hotel across the street from the pentagon with surveillance cameras. those cameras captured what hit the pentagon. but the FBI quickly confiscated those tapes on 9/11 and to this day refuse to release them.
gforce9 Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 5:15 pm
you will never see it my guess is because there was no plane it was a missile.
im innocent Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 5:24 pm
I think the reason why they are holding onto the footage for so long is that they can get some cg wizard to have several years to painstakingly put an airplane into the footage and make it look super grade A real, then they will release it maybe?
Also about the laser beam and the pod……i dont know anything specific but those doomsday planes have pods in them dont they? And they are forward communication craft so what if one of them had the equipment to remote fly the plane in the theatre of operations ???
just thoughts
October 1st, 2009 at 4:11 pm
It’s not a laser, not a drone, not some magic guiding light – it’s the reflection of the plane in the building’s windows. You people will believe almost anything, won’t you? Use your eyes and your brains for a minute or two.
Glen Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 5:36 pm
That’s a load of garbage, and you should know that…
=9-11 TRUTH WILL OUT= Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 11:01 pm
Go back to bed, Grump. Everything is alright.
Your check will be in the mailbox and your
cereal bowl will be on the table in the morning.
Your gov’t will take care of you. Not to worry…
(you STOOPIT old F*CK!)
Old Grump Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 2:30 am
F*ck off, jack*ss. If you’re too stupid to tell fact from fiction, then you deserve what’s coming. All of you mentally lazy dipsh*ts let Alex think for you and tell you what you should believe, and all the while he’s laughing all the way to the bank about how you dumbf*cks keep buying his bullsh*t rehashed DVDs and supporting his advertisers.
It’s mental incompetents like you that allowed the world to get so f*cked up and controlled in the first place. Crawl back into mommy’s basement while the people with brains, guts, integrity, and weapons sort it out for you. We’ll let you know when it’s safe to come back out. Just make sure mommy changes your diapers before letting you come up from the basement, cuz your sh*t stinks.
October 1st, 2009 at 4:15 pm
This is no way new I saw this at least 2 years ago. And yes look at that light on the WTC until the plane hits.
October 1st, 2009 at 4:15 pm
The white beam is a laser guide. Coming from a preadator drone. MSNBC had an infra-red capable camera in the right place at the right time to see the laser beam. Can’t see it with the naked eye. Also, pause the video at the 5 or 6 second mark. Notice the orange flash under the jet as it hits the building? That is a wire-guided high speed depleted urainium missile coming out of a pod under the jet.
October 1st, 2009 at 4:17 pm
I’ve seen this before.
Watch the laser targeting prior to the plane crashing into the building.
October 1st, 2009 at 4:19 pm
@Robie.
im beginning to think that the theories of government using holograms are true. look at the way the plane transitions into the tower. the front part hit the side and then disappears. you don’t see the back part enter, nor does anything come out the other end. if the plane was going as fast as they say it was surely there would have been an exit wound.
Me Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 4:47 pm
Surely parts of the wings would have Being thrown ouside the tower.Aluminium hits steel and concrete.but nothing at all. …Time for more cider.
October 1st, 2009 at 4:19 pm
http://911essentials.com says attention NO PLANERS:
Go have carnal relations with yourselves.
You’re whole world is done, over and we all know who and what you are …
OH, and we will be coming for you too after the major players are in prison.
Ipso Facto: you are toast.
911essentials is a primer portal introduction to the New World Order Corporate Banking Police State, its plans for one world government and their worship of the fake science Eugenics.
October 1st, 2009 at 4:22 pm
is it me or does it seem like before that 2nd plane hits, you see a row of white in succession start from the left side on that wall and go to the right. and it ends up being right above where the plane hits…..
interesting footage
October 1st, 2009 at 4:23 pm
Anyone else see the beam of light before the “plane” hit? Laser guided missile anyone?
UNDERDOG Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 7:55 pm
I posted the same question back when I was like the 4th post,
but it got shoved all the way down.
YES! There is some kind of locator spot or targeting beam
being directed on the tower seconds before the plane.
DON’T SHRUG IT OFF, PEOPLE… INVESTIGATE IT!
October 1st, 2009 at 4:29 pm
lol…. its a dark green plane… and theirs a bird flying around and it looks the plane size is about the size of a B2B bomber in ww2…
Ask your self one thing what happen to the silver planes if this is a green one…
October 1st, 2009 at 4:36 pm
All that paper flying about without being burnt…Yet the planes with their six ton engines “Just Vaporised”…Time for another glug of cider..something doesn’t make sense!
=9-11 TRUTH WILL OUT= Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 7:57 pm
Another slug of NWO KOOL-AID more like it.
NOTHING ADDS UP- INVESTIGATE IT!!!
Duke1 Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 2:39 pm
I’m wondering where the plane went? I could swear I remember seeing the plane sticking out of the bldg when the msm showed it. Wouldn’t the bldg be swaying? And where are all the chunks of debris that should’ve been coming out of the bldg? Why is everything pulverized? This looks like a fighter jet to me and it disappears as soon as it hits and the bombs go off. This certainly doesn’t look like the same image that was being shown by the msm when it first happened.
October 1st, 2009 at 4:37 pm
Go to http://www.projectcamelot.net. click on “interviews”, then click on “Henry Deacon” . here you’ll find transcricpts of a person who worked on “black Projects” at the Jet Proplusion Lab.(JPL) Mr. “Deacon” states that he and his co-workers were informed, hours BEFORE, that the 9/11 attacks would take place. He also said the planes that hit the Trade Center WERE COMPUTER-OVERRIDDEN, AND CONTROLLED BY REMOTE CONTROL. He also states that the PENTEGAON was hit by a small navy plane, also, remote contolled. P.S. Note to other Infowarriors: If you haven’t listened to Project Camelot interviews, I think it be worth you while if you get the time.
Belvedere Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 5:22 pm
Thank u!
October 1st, 2009 at 4:38 pm
Mass vacination was probably their back up plan just in case they where rumbled.
October 1st, 2009 at 4:46 pm
the flash of light before impact is the planes reflection .
jm Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 4:59 pm
wrong, pause at :06 plane is below the reflection. It’s also not a piece of paper since it is far too circular
=9-11 TRUTH WILL OUT= Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 7:59 pm
YOU CAN’T BE POSITIVE BECAUSE ITS NOT CLEAR…
TOO MUCH DOUBT- INVESTIGATE IT!!!
October 1st, 2009 at 4:59 pm
dont you wish you where that harmless piece of paper?
October 1st, 2009 at 5:05 pm
Did anybody see the white kinda flash coming from mid-top left corner down to the impact of the nose of the plane ??
October 1st, 2009 at 5:06 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XTv6GRDINjY Listen to my call in to Atlanta talk show host Neal Boortz where I slip in Operation Northwoods just after his rant about building 7 ,911 truth and Alex Jones listeners.
Teslavic Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 7:29 pm
Ryan, great job! That sh!t is FUNNY! He made damn sure that he DID NOT repeat the words ‘Operation Northwoods’ after the break. Because this shill knows, that if some skeptical listeners actually Googled it, they just might open their eyes and say, “WTF…Is this for real!?” And then the questions just start flowing. Followed by more research. Eventually something will click, and the picture will start to become more clear. I know… it happened to me.
I do find it comical, in a way, that all he can rely on is name calling throughout the whole clip.
Sounds like a typical gov’t theory cheerleader.
October 1st, 2009 at 5:09 pm
You Tube this…..Laser Painting WTC.
Jim Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 12:39 am
… http://www.youtube.com/watch?v.....84E26F7CFB
October 1st, 2009 at 5:12 pm
No planes hit the Twin Towers. Holograms of planes were set up to coincide with the bombs going off inside the towers. I thnk that whoever shot this film is an impostor and works for the insiders.
jm Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 5:20 pm
either way we know it was an inside job. Who cares if it was laser beams from a UFO, all that matters is it wasn’t muslims with box cutters.
9/11 was a way to trigger racism against Muslims to start a holy war WW 3.
Actually Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 5:40 pm
Shut the f--- up with your gullible ass. I’m sick of you hologram theorist no plane jackass conspiracy.
bullsh!t Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 11:54 pm
you are a DISGRACE to the truth movement.
your ignorance will be the end of you.
hipo Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 7:15 pm
And you can imagine which end.
October 1st, 2009 at 5:16 pm
Not sure if it’s a plane…or what kind of plane? Research: September Clues….you can find it on YouTube still.
October 1st, 2009 at 5:17 pm
Curious about the white dot traveling along the face of the buildings before and after the strike….check out Laser Painting WTC, and The Birds: UAV Morphing
October 1st, 2009 at 5:19 pm
I am more interested in the white “ufo” moving in front of the second tower to be hit in the first seconds of this vid..
It appears out of nothing and disappears into nothing, kinda freaky, not?
A piece of paper? A guiding light? I dont think so.. Ufo’s have the power to move in and out of our visible light, just as reptilians have, u know the ones that realy rule this world..?
Good vid!
Shanghai Spike Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 8:02 pm
REPTILIANS?
You mean like Prince Philip?
That’s a NWO TOAD if there ever was one.
October 1st, 2009 at 5:20 pm
To all the fools preaching the no planes theory, the “laser” you regard as moving down the front of the building toward the spot of the impact, is a piece of paper that was floating from the other tower! You can see its a piece of paper fluttering through the air although maybe my x ray goggles arent working right! OMG FoReaLZ The real evidence is the UFO in the background ! The elite control their terror attacks from flying saucers???! Totally forealzzzzzzz
….
Stop trying to discredit the movement with your absurd theories.
Belvedere Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 5:35 pm
uhm.. i didnt mention i believe in the no plane theory.. It could be true but i did not mention that ever..
All i say is that is see a white “blob/ufo” hoovering in front of the second tower to be hit.. I say hit because i see a plane flying into the building..
Second, i mentioned something about reptilians, wich i believe is real..
U need to watch some David icke vids.. serious!
He is not stupid, he spend the last 20 years of his life to save u and me.. Dont ever forget that! He sticks his head out of the window driving 120 miles an hour, for u to see whats going on!
Im not stating that it is real evidence.. The fact that i call it ufo it means i cant explain what it is..
What i do now know is that we human can only see 4% of total light vissible.. 96% is not seen because we are slaves of the NWO and made believe we only have 5 sences.. Thats all..
We have 6 or more.. Learn.. It’s all in the open.
October 1st, 2009 at 5:29 pm
The paper was dump from a helicopter with a few federal agents in it.
If you watched ABC news that day you would have saw it.
Belvedere Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 5:38 pm
Lol!
Shanghai Spike Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 8:03 pm
What’d the FEDS do,
wipe their @sses on it?
October 1st, 2009 at 5:47 pm
That sure as hell is no United Airlines jet. Oh I know maybe they went “green” with just that jet 8 years early. What bunk. No wonder they need to kill us with foreign merceneris and poisonous flu shots. The jig is up and they’d be swinging from trees in a few months.
roaddog6 Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 6:00 pm
if you want to debunk 911, just stick to the photos of the pentagon. It’s much easier to show the herd and those photos are believable. They speak for themselves. You can easily show that no plane hit. And if some of 911 was a lie, then all of it was. This is what I use. It works.
Duke1 Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 2:43 pm
I agree Chris-that was definitely not a UA jet.
October 1st, 2009 at 6:06 pm
U can the a laser light on the building. don’t know if anyone as pointed that out yet.
October 1st, 2009 at 6:06 pm
you can see a laser light.
Robbie Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 7:12 pm
yes, it’s a paper falling down.
Jim Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 12:34 am
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v.....84E26F7CFB
Robbie Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 10:25 am
Thanks for the info .. very interesting
October 1st, 2009 at 6:43 pm
Two things I learned: My out box will not send many videos to my freinds revealing issues by Alex Jones.
I have concluded that about 90% of the populace are dishonest [liars] after 911.
They think main stream news is truth. That’s lying to themselves. When they say to your offer, evidence of an inside job, no I don’t want hear it. Think about it millions of people are murded from 911 and they don’t want to hear about it. What disingenuos, dishonest, lying people we have in this Country. They first lie to themselves and then you. That’s 90% of the people.
October 1st, 2009 at 7:07 pm
At least I can spell “retarded” you dumb f---. Pentagon troll. f--- off and don’t come back.
Lizard Tits Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 7:50 pm
“retarted”: “to tart again”; “the act of refilling with a tart, or re-supply of tarts.”
hipo Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 7:17 pm
He he he he more please!
October 1st, 2009 at 7:08 pm
That is clearly a piece of paper from other building. No doubt as i can see!
jm Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 7:21 pm
if it is a piece of paper, it would not continue its descent unaffected around the fire ball. The dot goes straight through the trajectory of the plane (first clue) and it continues on and is not pushed any faster based on the explosion. Other debris is falling around it and yet this “magic paper” continues on as if it is unaffected by its surroundings, because it is a laser unaffected by the plane.
esha Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 12:55 am
Hey All
To me it loks to be a piece of paper not a laser. But the plane is definitely no a commercial plane and you can see the flash and then you can see where the missle/rocket came out the other side exactly where the flash/missle hit! Yes we need this footage save and slow down does any one know how to do that?
Love, Peace, & Harmony
Duke1 Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 2:44 pm
And the piece of paper looks very large compared to that small, creepy-looking jet.
October 1st, 2009 at 7:16 pm
http://video.google.com/videop.....amp;hl=en#
October 1st, 2009 at 7:18 pm
after the plane impacts, the dot continues to travel across the building onto the other building, you can see how other pieces are falling faster than it and it continues it’s slow descent. How is a piece of paper, essentially weightless, not thrown off, plus it is on the exact same spot the plane hits. I guess we can throw it in the coincidence bin.
October 1st, 2009 at 7:22 pm
stop the video at :08 you can see the dot literally in the fire ball. If it was a piece of paper it would get burned up.
October 1st, 2009 at 7:23 pm
and then at :15 it goes away
October 1st, 2009 at 7:24 pm
YOU CAN SEE A LAZER GUIDING THE PLANE. IT GOES FROM LEFT TO RIGHT ACROSS THE WTC TOWER, THEN IT HITS THE OTHER BUILDING! SEE IT?
http://video.google.com/videos.....BAQqwQwAA#
Jim Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 12:26 am
Awesome. News to me. Highly plausible targeting by a UAV. Good find.
October 1st, 2009 at 7:24 pm
The “laser light” is in fact debris. Watch the video frame by frame and you will see is starts coming in from the left of the building and floats across at a slightly downward angle to the right and continues past the building. There is no doubt it is debris, but it is a crazy freaky coincidence.
jm Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 7:28 pm
if it was debris it would not be falling at an angle, nor would it go that slowly.
=9-11 TRUTH WILL OUT= Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 8:05 pm
TOO MUCH DOUBT
INVESTIGATE IT!!!
Welshman[UK] Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 4:00 am
hahahahahahah……… debris!……. idiot!!
October 1st, 2009 at 7:25 pm
at :41 you can see hundreds of pieces of paper floating in the air, which is what paper would do that high up, not drop uniformly through the air. Paper does not make a downward arc through the air, it flutters like it does at :41
October 1st, 2009 at 7:26 pm
Guy, get your glasses cleaned. That is clearly a laser honing in on that point of impact on the building. Watch it carefully. When will the public take off their blinders and stop believing the governments b/s?? 911 was organised and carried out by the bush regime in the quest to implement the nwo agenda of suppression through fear tactics. And it worked beautifully to by the way. It is a tragedy that the American populace has to endure these manipulations by the puppet masters. It is a huge deception that has been carried out, and goes a lot further than two structures being bombed. Your overlords are going to kill you all, and 911 is one part of a much larger puzzle. God help us all.
Thomas Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 9:54 pm
Absolutely f***ing A! Looks like the “aircraft” goes exactly where it is pointed….
hipo Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 7:22 pm
Is it not the case that the high cost of an airplane is due to the fact that the people who build them want them to go where they are pointed or have I missed the point here?.
October 1st, 2009 at 7:26 pm
and at 1:12 you can see a real piece of paper fluttering in the wind, flapping back and forth, the dot in the beginning video does no such thing.
October 1st, 2009 at 7:39 pm
Is that white smoke coming out of the front and back of the pod on the bottom of the jet as the missile fires up right before entry into the WTC?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2lOcEOsmAtA
lyncher Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 8:26 am
that video is fake, look at the gap between the left wing and the building when “the airplane” is passin’ through.
the logic of truth Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 5:38 pm
another bingoooooooooooo……..
many people here don’t focus on the inpact .
stop the video on 0.06 or 0.07 and you just see just a tiny hole while the big huge airplane dissapears without wings breaking at impact .
the explosion is far to late .
Airplanes are flying bombs shortly after takeoff !
as for the wings ,try for yourself at home to beat up a steel wall or pillar with an aluminium hammer !
i guess the hammer will break at the first impact or ?
October 1st, 2009 at 7:43 pm
Funny how every video zooms in right before the ”plane” hits. I have never seen a good one where you see the ”plane” from a mile away or so. I wonder why? Port Authority owns that whole area. They were loosing money on the WTC complex so what other way to get there money back. Blow it up and collect insurance money. I guess they figured blaming it on Osama Bin Bulls--- would be a good scapegoat. Jews and Freemasons did this. Period!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
October 1st, 2009 at 7:54 pm
The flash on the right side of the nose of the plane just before it hits is very visible in this video. Excellent case for military plane. The plane looks gray, not silver like an American Airlines plane.
Welshman[UK] Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 3:59 am
Ignore the jet entering the building …..look at the laser guidance spot travelling from top left to right…….. this video captures it perfectly!
Enoch7 Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 7:33 am
Right. If your interested, look into the background of a man named Timothy J. Klaustis {Lori Klaustis} husband. Lori was the girl found dead in congressmen Joe Scarborow’s office a few months before 911. I believe she is dead as a result of pillow talk. Timothy works as a high level scientist on weapons for the military. His specialty is Acoustic holography. He makes reports and does research with Northrop Grumman. What people are looking at is a missile encased in a hologram complete with sound adjustment. The different angles cause the hologram to appear different in color and distorted in some shots. You can find some footage where the wings dissipate from sharp angle movement. One thing is absolute; The wings on those planes cannot stay intact and connected to the fuselage. The steel reinforced concrete walls of WTC1 and WTC2 are too great a density to allow the surface of the wings to enter. The wings would fold back. Physics cannot be altered.
Welshman[UK] Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 9:18 am
Its just a Jet being guided into its target…. nothing more…. nothing less.
October 1st, 2009 at 7:56 pm
All of the debris that starts flying after the olive drag colored plan hits the building looks paper sized too. Ok, maybe just alittle bigger. So a 747 hits a plane and all the debris is paper size?
Look through this catalog of UA aircraft and try to find an olive drab colored plan.
http://www.united.com/page/art.....28,00.html
Good find. People should never forget what happened on 911 no matter how many years we spend arguing over the truth, no matter how tired you get about arguing it, 911 is the starting point.
I do not need to educate myself any more concerning the events of 911 or what has happend since then, or where I think we are heading. A prudent man would prepare.
October 1st, 2009 at 8:07 pm
We think it is a reflection in the glass…..look at the building next to it, you’ll see it till impact
October 1st, 2009 at 8:33 pm
I saw three terrorists passports fly, did you also see them in the video?
Aussie Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 8:50 pm
ghjiu:
No i never saw any passports!
I did however see A4 size paper floating down “intact” which survived an explosive fireball!
You would have seen the same ghjiu…such as the sheet in the lady’s hand!!!
October 1st, 2009 at 8:54 pm
the white dot is definitely a laser- other vids have captured this. The beam goes through the the tower in question and can be seen on the other tower on a straight trajectory- which I might add appears to have originated from WTC 7
October 1st, 2009 at 8:59 pm
When will you guys move out of your parents’ basement, get real careers and figure out that this wasn’t an inside job? Could you pick maybe just a month and year? Ballpark timeframe? I’m guessing never. Have fun living your lives in fear of conspirators that do not exist and a government that means you no harm. Also, enjoy spending your hard earned money on DVDs produced by Mr. Jones. Please, keep feeding him money so he can keep stoking your fear. Have a pleasant day.
Jeremy Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 9:41 pm
Man. I wish I wasn’t sitting in the office at my own house right now.
Even if 9/11 wasn’t an inside job, have you ever listened to Alex? He breaks stories before it hits the mainstream. Have you seen anything going on in the past two days?
“Oh that liar Alex Jones just got lucky! He’s part of all of this so he can make a HUGE profit off of selling his documentaries.”
Go read up at CNN.com a little more and add to the sleeper cells we have here.
Any no one should trust Alex at all. Look it all up on your own. He says that daily. He’s not the one to be trusted, the facts are.
TEXAS IdentityCrisis Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 6:49 am
It would be so easy to expose the criminal who did this, were it not that the masses were so IGNORANT! I’m so sick of people like you who absolutely are BLIND! There is so much evidence in support of the fact that 911 was an inside job. I cannot wait until the trials begin. How can people be so IGNORANT!?
White Man Taliban Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 12:00 pm
Vet – you are the exact reason all US military personel will be denied their retirement checks in the future. as a matter of fact i think it’s time we take a poll:
Do you think that military personel deserve their retirement check?
a) No
b) Yes
October 1st, 2009 at 9:06 pm
“We think it is a reflection in the glass…..look at the building next to it, you’ll see it till impact”
I disagree.
1.Try walking toward the mirror and your reflection end up 20 feet above your head.
2. The side of the building the plane hits is in a shawdow. The sun would need to be on the other side of the building for me believe that it is a reflection.
3. That piece of paper floated, ever so slowly, all the way around the WTC1, maintaining its elevation, until it become visible in WTC2’s shadow, and then speeds up travel the width of the building and drop it’s elevation all within 2 or 3 seconds tops.
4. The fireball blows out the sides of the buildings but no piece of either plane gets blown out with it. The fire was so hot that people could then stand in the gapping hole of each building while each building and each plane melted.
Imagine a piece of paper traveling the width of your apartment building or your house within 2 or 3 seconds.
October 1st, 2009 at 9:23 pm
Here is what i mean…. this a video done by the media… showing a silver plane…
only advance media can pull that off…. they have the tools and the delay time to re edit the video on demand…
Now your dealing with an instant extermination by its own institutions….. with H1N1 to cover up anthing its path…. Man made virus…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2lOcEOsmAtA
October 1st, 2009 at 9:24 pm
Its going to make the German trials look like a picnic…
base on the data so far theirs many level that scatter the world…
Don Diego Vega Reply:
October 1st, 2009 at 10:52 pm
We can only hope, Z!
October 1st, 2009 at 9:33 pm
Here’s a gray Air Force “jumbo” for comparison:
http://texasscribbler.com/images/blueskies.jpg
October 1st, 2009 at 9:54 pm
WE HAVE SEEN MILLIONS OF THESE SHOTS, WHAT MAKES THIS MORE SPECIAL THAN ANY OTHER. YOU WANT TO GET MY ATTENTION, SHOW ME THE PENTAGON, A FIELD IN PENNSYLVANIA, OR STREET IN OKLAHOMA CITY WHERE PEOPLE ARE WALKING AWAY FROM A TRUCK. YOU WHISTLE BLOWERS KNOW WHAT I’M TALKING ABOUT. DON’T WAIT TO LONG, THINK ABOUT OUR FUTURE. OR JUST SHOW US A PLANE UNLOADING IN CLEVELAND. WHY ARE THE PLANES STILL IN SERVICE?
October 1st, 2009 at 9:58 pm
Here’s a gray Air Force “jumbo” for comparison:
http://texasscribbler.com/images/blueskies.jpg
Bingo!!
I was just thinking, on what planet would you expect a white piece of paper in a shadow to be more reflective and more visible than a big, white, metal plane!!
It is not a piece of paper and that is not a big, white, metal plane in that video.
October 1st, 2009 at 10:13 pm
I am a Marine Corp vet. I know what a C130 or a C5 looks like. I live in ATL. I pass the airport every day. I have seen planes that appear to stand still in the air as I drive south and the plane is heading east.
I have never seen any plane to fly out of the ATL airport that looked olive drab.
Freeze frame with the plane’s nose on the building. The plane is practically the same color and as the building. The white UA plane….like the white piece of paper.
Welshman[UK] Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 3:55 am
Laser guidance spot……. to imply that its a piece of paper is just plain stupid!
October 1st, 2009 at 10:32 pm
P.S. http://img245.imageshack.us/img245/4061/119ce.jpg
Save to desktop. Hit the pick color icon (It looks like medicine dropper) Click anywhere on the plane. Switch to brush and move mouse to the sky. Write WHITE and tell me what color that plan is.
October 1st, 2009 at 10:45 pm
Probably.
The colored folk were all home watchin’ it on TV
as usual.
October 1st, 2009 at 10:54 pm
Alex oughta CHARGE YOU for all the freaking BANDWIDTH
you use up with that, truther!
But the SCRIPTURES are NEEDFUL…
Its just a heck of a lot to read.
October 1st, 2009 at 11:24 pm
It’s a piece of paper. You can see it to the left of the building (in the clear blue sky) before the plane hits….then it floats in between the plane and the camera…..then when the plane hits, you can still see it floating at the same angle in front of that smaller building on the right in the foreground of the WTC.
It’s pretty obvious actually.
Welshman[UK] Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 3:53 am
lol….. idiot.
October 2nd, 2009 at 12:09 am
look at this idiot. just cause you got your CAPS on dont mean your s--- doesnt stink. why dont you shut the hell up and open your mind and try to stop being damn ignorant. even if you dont agree with what someone says doesnt mean their opinion is any less then yours. so get over yourself and get your head outta your ass.
ps – that sure as hell AINT no piece of paper
guy Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 2:48 am
why so serious?
TEXAS IdentityCrisis Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 6:54 am
Um…thousands of innocents murdered? Lies and manipulations? Thousands more die in the war this lie created? The Constitution – trampled to death? MY GOD! I am sick of being so serious, but what choice do we have, when the masses are unable to see or hear the truth!
bullsh!t Reply:
October 3rd, 2009 at 9:30 pm
couldn’t of said it better myself
October 2nd, 2009 at 12:16 am
yea and one black guy collen powell!
October 2nd, 2009 at 12:33 am
Check this out. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v.....84E26F7CFB
October 2nd, 2009 at 12:34 am
It is definitely the light from a laser moving across the building, but it is a white laser which denotes a cutting laser. That LASER is more than likely cutting the main girders instead of it being a targeting laser. Government figured peoples attention would be on the plane not the ambiguous light tracing across the building!
Welshman[UK] Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 3:52 am
To suggest that its a “cutting” laser is absurd. Its quite definatley a spotting laser for guidance.
October 2nd, 2009 at 12:48 am
Think about it for a sec. when the 2nd tower started to collapse. It makes sense, if the girders were pre-cut by the laser, then when the outer structure reached critical weakness then it would just fall over as it did, then the other controlled demolition charges were set off making it appear as a pancake collapse. The second plane never came anywhere near the main girders and the tower would have never in a million years just fallen over when the outer structure reached critical weakness, it would have just been a burned out hull. Someone had to have been there ready to pull the firing pin when the collapse began, which of course they knew was going to happen.
Welshman[UK] Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 4:25 am
Nothing to think about….. it simply IS NOT a cutting laser…… IT IS a spotting laser for guidance….. to suggest anything other than that is crass stupidity.
October 2nd, 2009 at 1:39 am
heres the footage slowed down X3 and X5 and a still photo.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OspVC3_A6cY
October 2nd, 2009 at 3:34 am
Everyone can see the laser guidance spot that travels from the top left of the building at a diagonal down and to the right…. appearing just above the jet before it enters the building….. it then reappears on the top left of the building next to it after the gap between buildings. The E4B’s had a purpose that day…… you can see it only too well in this video. I am suprised that mainstream media has not picked up on such an obvious “SNAFU” by the perps!!!!!!!
October 2nd, 2009 at 4:04 am
Welshman is right
October 2nd, 2009 at 4:56 am
In my opinion, after start stop on full screen as fast as I could make it do so, that”laser” you talk about can be followed through the crash. It seemed to be 30 feet or better a nanosecond before the crash above the impact zone, then crosses the face of the building to the right. Shadows and all, that plane is gray, or lt green. If so, where’s the real plane, and passengers,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Korea
Tennessee Trucker Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 7:46 am
Excellent question. Where is the lady who took the boarding passes on the flight from Boston? Where are the air traffic controllers who witnessed the whole thing on their screens? Who is the guy in China who signed for the WTC scrap from the largest crime scene ever? The car keeps smoking more and more, but the government won’t let us take a look under the hood, why?
Jim Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 10:07 am
This discusses that aspect. http://philjayhan.wordpress.co.....light-175/
October 2nd, 2009 at 4:59 am
SHOWMEBBY is right there is a light on the building that travels down to the exact point where the plane hit like a guided missile besides any one who believes that a plane can just melt into a steel structure is retarded….besides who has ever seen a plane fly 500 mph in such a low altitude yall should look up why a plane cant travel 500 mph in low altitudes
tky4ever Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 2:40 pm
truth7989, if you take a second look at the video you will notice that the light continues through the explosion and smoke, crosses to the building in the videos mid-ground dipping in and out of the buildings recesses before vanishing (it’s turned off).
tky4ever Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 2:47 pm
My question though is, why this light doesn’t show in any other of the videos?
October 2nd, 2009 at 5:39 am
I see the Infrared Designation move across the tower ahead of the plane. 9/11 was an inside job walk up to washington and arrest the freaks. What are you waiting for? Invitation ?
TEXAS IdentityCrisis Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 7:06 am
Both Dr. Horowitz and Jane Burgermeister have both file huge affidavits with all the relevant data. Stop encouraging people to jump the gun. The TRUTH will come out IN TRIALS that can only be avoided by killing EVERY SINGLE truther. SO, it is only a matter of time….there will be JUSTICE!
October 2nd, 2009 at 5:41 am
Notice how we hear the impact a fraction of a second before it happens? EVEN THOUGH it should take a little time for the sound to get to the camera hundreds of fett away?
October 2nd, 2009 at 5:50 am
A UAV is being controlled to emit the dot onto the building, the clumpsy projection indicates the person controlling is not at the scene and is using the UAV camera to navigate.
October 2nd, 2009 at 6:37 am
Look carefully at the smoke in front of the building around the 4 sec mark and you’ll see a white spot in the smoke in line with the white spot on the building before the plane hits. To me, that’s proof positive that a IR laser was used as a target designator, probably from the E4B that was seen flying in the background in the full version of this video.
October 2nd, 2009 at 6:51 am
Considering that the camera is almost a mile away from the action, the size of the windows in the WTC’s are what about a foot in width or more? That laser pointer is rather large and round to cover the width of one, maybe two window frames at a time. Also, how can a piece of paper move onto and sit on the fireball then move across the street and blink out on the brown building?
October 2nd, 2009 at 7:03 am
How is talk of race helping fetter out the truth? There is more than one race involved in this HUGE, ONGOING conspiracy. Stop trolling, you like helping murderous freaks?!
Aussie Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 8:33 am
Sort your identity crisis out first…i might then respond!!!
Texas IdentityCrisis Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 12:31 pm
As I suspected, you have no response.
October 2nd, 2009 at 7:39 am
We investigate steroids in baseball more than we investigate the murder of 2,900+ citizens and the conehead Colonel who posts above just cares about his retirement check, it’s sad, what a treasonous traitor he is. If you are not part of the justice, you are part of the corruption.
October 2nd, 2009 at 8:21 am
this website is not better than others, “they” sensor comments too
October 2nd, 2009 at 8:26 am
THE PHYSICS OF 9/11 IS SOLVED
Anyone with critical thinking skills who looks at evidence understands what physically happened. Who or why is anyone’s guess, but the physics of 9/11 is solved.
KNOWN FACT: The buildings could not have collapsed at all (not even one floor) from plane impacts and burning
KNOWN FACT: Large Boeing aircraft can’t fly the speeds of the flying thing shown in the videos at sea level. They would immediately break apart.
KNOWN FACT: The impact with the building is cartoon physics which violates Newton’s third law of motion. The object travels the same speed through air as it does through the building as if the building is air without any bending or breaking of the plane.
KNOWN FACT: Jennifer Spell’s camera was a digital camcorder that could see infra red light like from a TV remote control or from a LASER TARGETING SYSTEM. The laser dot is seen as reflected from three different buildings as well as reflected from the smoke.
the logic of truth Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 4:36 pm
bingo………………
jackpot…………………….
October 2nd, 2009 at 8:42 am
REPLY – arno
true – this is NOT NEW VIDEO…I HAVE SEEN THIS FOOTAGE MANY MANY MANY TIMES OVER
October 2nd, 2009 at 8:43 am
“the truthers” including alex jones hid the FACT that airplanes were NON existent in the murders of 9/11/2001.
October 2nd, 2009 at 8:49 am
Its true – this is NOT NEW VIDEO…I HAVE SEEN THIS FOOTAGE MANY MANY MANY TIMES OVER – Look at the vid “September Clues” and you will see the same footage.
AVRONA Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 8:50 am
Why is this being posted as NEW MATERIAL ???? this is NOT NEW VIDEO…I HAVE SEEN THIS FOOTAGE MANY MANY MANY TIMES OVER – Look at the vid “September Clues” and you will see the same footage.
Jim Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 10:15 am
September Clues. http://www.youtube.com/view_pl.....84E26F7CFB
lyncher Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 2:13 pm
if people watch “september clues” and do some research will find out that we were deceived by the mainstream media.
the logic of truth Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 6:08 pm
lyncher ,then look who owns them and you know why!
http://thelogicoftruth.blogspo.....orlds.html
October 2nd, 2009 at 8:50 am
these asshole keep sensorin’ me.
the logic of truth Reply:
October 3rd, 2009 at 3:41 am
do it different ,be smart and they post it !
October 2nd, 2009 at 8:50 am
Nothing to see here folks, move along.
October 2nd, 2009 at 8:51 am
This idea has been bounced around before. Since we all can agree that the Doomsday planes were in the skies on 9/11, it has been theorized that the flash coming from the plane’s underbelly or “pod”, is actually self destructing right before the impact. Why risk the imperfections of a laser guided system when you can have a dedicated radio controlled delivery from onboard the Doomsday plane? That’s exactly what they’re used for among other wartime communication duties.
October 2nd, 2009 at 8:55 am
thank you!!!
now watch this video………….
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v.....g&NR=1
lyncher Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 6:33 pm
the link above shows that the wings “disappear” before the airplane hits the building.
October 2nd, 2009 at 9:51 am
All you supporters of tyranny and facists, just keep sleeping, go on now, go to bed, dream about how the economy is getting better honour your God’s, and let the smart people do the thinking.
October 2nd, 2009 at 9:56 am
Well, it definetely IS NOT a “piece of paper” as many claim. If it were a “piece of paper”, that would have to be one hell of a large piece of paper – especially when compared against the wing of the aircraft!
If indeed there was a conspiracy to murder thousands of innocent people, then we all know who the criminals are – the government.
There are just too many documented “coincidences” for this to have been anything else but intentional, willful, mass-murder.
Have people already forgotten the documented incident where all Israeli employees were told to leave the towers 1 hour before the planes hit?
Have people forgotten the documented report where Dick Cheney ordered a “stand-down” of NORAD?
People tend to forget a lot of things when they let fear control thier emotions and reasoning.
Richard Nixon was not a crook, and Dick Cheney shot his friend in the face by accident.
Hmmmmm……
October 2nd, 2009 at 10:35 am
It is a piece of paper because as the fireball shoots out of the side of the building you can see the paper continue from the path of what you call a lazer point.
It is also shaped like a piece of paper! They were remote controlled.
That satan worshipper Bush was in the classroom and the innocent kids were chanting words probably offered from the Bush group.
5 words KITE PLANE MUST HIT STEEL.
Not in that order but in a satonic service is it not important to have the words in the correct order. Hidden in plain sight.
You Tube those 5 words and watch for yourself.
A kite plane would be a plane under remote control.
Welshman[UK} Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 11:14 am
You really were last in the line when the brains were being handed out……
jon Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 8:31 pm
and what does that comment prove or disprove? I think you are saying that if I don’t see it the way you see it then I am stupid. Interesting.
LVYTHN Reply:
October 4th, 2009 at 2:43 pm
Do you know how big that piece of “paper” would be from this distance ? Or in comparison to the wing of the plane ….
October 2nd, 2009 at 11:07 am
Could the white light on the building be the reflection of lights on the plane in the window panes as it aproaches and makes impact. It would account for how the white light seems to move towards the point of impact. Are the lights on the wings or fusualge? Maybe its just a piece of paper floating past the building from the other impact on building 1. I really dont know. Interesting Video.
Wayland Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 12:03 pm
It’s a small spot of light for some seconds before the plane is close. I thought it was a bird caught in sunlight with the tower in shadow behind. But then it’s too close to the tower to be lit by the sun. I do suspect it’s an infra red laser that can be seen with many digital cameras but not visible to the eye. If so it maybe linked to guiding the plane to the target.
The sound accompanying the crash is very suspicious. What is that the sound of? It can’t be the crash, the explosion sound takes 8 seconds to receach the camera position.
October 2nd, 2009 at 11:17 am
Please, for everyone commenting here about 9/11, who still doesn’t think that Cheney, Bush (W. and his “Poppy”), Rumsfeld, David Rockefeller, et.al. planned and carried-out 9/11, take heed—All the (”air-tight”) SCIENTIFIC FACT evidence and the (legal-”Beyond a reasonable doubt”) circumstancial evidence that PROVES 9/11 was IN FACT an inside job, is in Prof. David Ray Griffin’s lastest book, “DEBUNKING 9/11 DEBUNKING.” So, if you haven’t taken the time to read this book, essentially the LEGAL CASE (which will hopefully be used in the coming “NYCAN Investigation”)which will bring the NWO/Globalist perps to justice, then you are also an un-American NAZI-Fascist, and you should just admit it!!!! — Instead of mouthing-off that 9/11 was not an inside job.
October 2nd, 2009 at 11:22 am
I’ve looked at other close up footage of the plane hiting the building if you look at it over and over again it looks as though the plane fade’s in to the building and than it explodes when thiers and impact you have a smash things beak up this plane doesn’t it disapears into the building
October 2nd, 2009 at 11:52 am
As an airline pilot I must say this. On September 11, 2001 the Gov claimed on that date 4 airliners jet, 2 B-757 and 2 B-767 crashed on that date. Each aircraft had 2 engines 6,000 lbs. titanium alloy; those engines won’t vaporize as gov claim. All 8 engines never found because there were no airplanes crashing on that date. They can come up with more new 911 video never seen but that doesn’t change the fact that on that date the physical evidence of those engines were never found.
the logic of truth Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 4:41 pm
another bingo …
the logic of truth Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 4:47 pm
danny ,
as an airplane pilot ,what do you think hit the towers ?
don’t get me wrong .
sincerly thelogicoftruth
Danny Reply:
October 3rd, 2009 at 12:38 pm
Hi, there. If you look closely to pictures or videos at the alleged aircraft areas of impact you will see steel beams bent outward indicating explosion from inside the building. Also eye witnesses at the base of the tower heard explosions on both towers. The towers high were a little over a 1000 feet. An airliner flying about 600 to 800 ft at full throttle it will make a lot of noise that anyone bellow the tower can hear it and since is not flying above the speed of sound many people could had the chance to see the aircraft. The max structural cruising speed for a B-757 at sea level is around 360 knots, above this speed the structural integrity is in jeopardy. People that claim that saw an airplane are part of the conspiracy to inject confusion and the media has the most advantage .
the logic of truth Reply:
October 4th, 2009 at 6:08 am
thanks danny thats what i suspected too at a 100% ,
an observation of myself ,
i saw months ago a video taken from the inside of one of the towers right before the collapse of the 2nd tower .
youtube allready deleted that version ( youtube =zionists ) but i will tell you about what i noticed on that video .
so as the tower starts to collapse you could hear on that particular video of course an awefull lot of noise but ,
close to the end of the collapse between all the other noise ,i could hear a swelling bum bum bum bum bum noise underneath the other noise in rhytmic intervalls just like explosions .
in the beginning i had to listen over and over again ,but after a while i heard the rhytmic explosions clearer and clearer .
as i quoted above youtube deleted that video ( and kept a lot of fakes to undermine the truth movement) so i can’t give you any proof to it ,but i am 100% sure i heard those explosions .
i need my hearing for work and believe me it is well trained .
the video i’m talking about was taken by the NY firefighters from the inside .
now on youtube they have just that 7 min. long video from those firefighters .
but when it comes to the collapse the audio and video breaks up right in that particular moment towards the end of the collapse .
now how is that ?
i’m no pilot ,but my take is :
that there were no planes ,no missiles or similar hitting the buildings only the explosions from the inside .
the event was planed long time before 9/11 and undercover agents were all around in that area that particular day and as we all know ,: when one sheep bahhhhs then others do bahhhhh.
i mean somebody shouts an airplane and everybody has seen an airplaine .
you are right on that too .
i guess they had hidden loudspeakers to make the airplane noise somewhere .
hope you watched the video of those dancing jews close to a black van right after the event ?
all videos are faked and prepared in advance thats why
most of the videos that show the direct impact zoom in ,right in time before the impact .
( somebody quoted that before here on that post somewhere )
and the voice of the woman with nerves of steel is definitely to calm for such a major event ,she didn’t even panic a bit nor is she surprised enough ( cool ice blooded mossad girl ?)
even stupid bush said live on tv that he saw the first impact on tv and there was no news coverage at all ,at this time .
i can’t help it but when the suposed airliner hits the building it looks to unnatural to me in all videos .
the videos are all computer fakes to me .
i hope i didn’t bored the s--- out of you .
thanks again for your reply !
Watcher Reply:
October 8th, 2009 at 10:34 pm
http://911review.org/brad.com/.....ebris.html
i know its all lies but the NWO did plant plenty of engines as evidence on 9/11.
Danny Reply:
October 9th, 2009 at 8:47 am
Thanks for the link. A commercial Jet airliner has a lot of parts of different manufactures and each part no matter how small it is or big it has part number and serial number written on them. Those serial numbers belongs to the aircraft maintenance records file. When maintenance is performed and has replaced a part, maintenance personnel duty and responsibility is to record and to enter the data pertaining to the part on the aircraft’s record. For argument sake let’s take the engines. The external and internal parts of the engines for example rotor blades, each blade has a serial number or part number and if you find a rotor blade in the moon, and turned in the part found to authorities like FAA, they can tell you from what aircraft that part came from and if they have a missing aircraft they can go directly to the missing aircraft record to see if that part belongs to it. Those engine pictures are neither from a B-757 nor B-767 they are a lot bigger.
October 2nd, 2009 at 12:11 pm
I clearly saw the laser reflection on the building the first time I watched it. I didn’t need anyone to point that out to me.
October 2nd, 2009 at 1:14 pm
They were some distance away. Think about thunder and lightening. The sounds of the hit hit should have taken several seconds to reach them. Yet the sounds were simultaneous, apparently we are to believe that terrorist have overcome the laws of physics.
October 2nd, 2009 at 2:05 pm
oh what a wonderful video late in its arrival. Sooo Much for the question of how a passport was able to be fully intact and found at ground zero. Is there a problem with this video? of course there is….. If NO planes were used on 911 the obviously the video was faked. It is obvious to me that the only reason this was released was the passport question. What I find interesting is that only 1 piece of paper seemed to land by them fully intact???? This vid only begs more questions
October 2nd, 2009 at 2:16 pm
to the dumbasses who think that that thing floating around the buildiing’s wall just before the plane hits, is a piece of paper:
If it is in fact a piece of paper, it’s gotta be one HUGE sheet. I mean, you can’t even see the giant windows of the tower, and yet, you can clearly see a little paper? Just compare it to the size of the wing of the plane. Now, could a piece of paper be that huge? It’s more like a rug than a paper. It was not a piece of paper. It’s either the plane’s reflection, or it’s a laser target pin-pointer.
October 2nd, 2009 at 3:05 pm
You can certainly see the flash at impact!
October 2nd, 2009 at 3:09 pm
What is 8.5″*11″?
Answer:
A piece of paper.
inches! very very small unit of measurement.
The camera recording is from over at least! 1 mile away…
Logically – think about it.
g.
October 2nd, 2009 at 3:13 pm
A piece of paper is 8.5″ * 11″
Inches! The size of your D**k.
And you can see it from miles away.
Logically! – think about it
October 2nd, 2009 at 3:14 pm
If you watch it enough you can see that was not a piece of paper. Heaven help us b/c if they got away w/ this they’ll get away w/ anything.
October 2nd, 2009 at 3:15 pm
messages keep getting deleted.
way to go (thumbs up!)
October 2nd, 2009 at 3:15 pm
I have questions about this supposed raw video, 1) why does the person shooting this video seem to zoom in at the same rate of speed as the light tracing across the building 2) why is there little reaction to the horrifying event that is taking place before her very eyes ( if it were me my reaction would have panned away the camera to be sure I was seeing what I was seeing) 3 odd that the girl would make a comment about “who is crazy enough to kill themselves like that”. At this juncture even the media is still playing the assumption that this is an fluke accident. No mention yet of a terrorist attack or hijackings. Why does THIS girl assume there is some maniac on a suicide mission flying THAT PLANE?
October 2nd, 2009 at 3:16 pm
My message says:
a piece of paper is 8.5″ * 11″ – INCHES!
Think about it logically -
October 2nd, 2009 at 3:19 pm
The side of the building the plane hits is in a shawdow.
That piece of paper floated, ever so slowly, all the way around the WTC1,
maintaining its elevation, until it become visible in WTC2’s shadow, and
then speeds up travel the width of the building and drop it’s elevation
all within 2 or 3 seconds tops to wind up just above the 2nd plane when it hit the building.
WOW. What are chances of that happening twice.
Imagine a piece of paper traveling the width of your apartment building or
your house within 2 or 3 seconds.
The fireball blows out the sides of the buildings but no piece of either
plane gets blown out with it. The fire was so hot that people could then
stand in the gapping hole of each building while each building and each
plane melted.
On what planet would you expect a white piece of paper in a shadow to be
more reflective and more visible than a big, white, metal plane!!
It is not a piece of paper and that is not a big, white, metal plane in that video.
Who can say that the plane in this video is white?
October 2nd, 2009 at 3:24 pm
One more observation and I’ll quit, AND why does this girl feel confident enough that there WON”T be another plane striking the WTC at any moment to video tape the paper floating down out of the sky.
October 2nd, 2009 at 3:50 pm
ANSWER:
Because people are focused on the wrong f---ing thing.
Do you see the big olive drag airplane hitting the building?
It is not a UA plane so who gives a f--- about the voices on any video, who gives a f--- about anyones reaction, who gives a f--- about the govt. doing mock terrorist drills on the same day, who gives a f--- that Building 7 collapsed from shock, who gives a f--- about security run by Bushes relative shutting down prior to Sept. 11, who gives a f--- about Osama Bin Laden’s family being the only plane in the air after the attack, who gives a f--- .
That is not an United Airline Plane in the video. PERIOD.
October 2nd, 2009 at 4:15 pm
You guys are ridiculous.
That light you see is the reflection of the sun off the windows of the cockpit. Hence why it moves at the same speed as the place, why it “points” to the building, and why it disappears after impact.
Even if it WERE a laser, how big of a laser do you think you would need to create a reflection that large? That “laser dot” you see in this video would have to be more than a story in diameter.
Some of you are even arguing over the color of the plane, that AA planes are silver when this plane is clearly grey so that, naturally, proves conspiracy. Come on. You’re arguing gray vs silver from the picture off a handheld digital camcorder, filming an image from what appears to be over a mile away. I guess I don’t need to point out, then, that the plane is in the shade because all of you genious have taken that into account already while forming your conspiracy theories based on this grainy video.
There are many questions yet to be answered regarding 9/11: Building 7, found passports, Flight 93, etc. But you people hurt the cause far more than help it, as every little detail gets blown out of proportion. There are logical answers that you miss because you’re too caught up in the hysteria of the event. Choose your battle wisely. Don’t freak out about the smallest of suspicious details like those automatically prove your point.
Sparky Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 7:47 pm
These are not “the smallest of details”, they are yet more evidence that is piles upon even bigger piles of evidence.
That said, this is NOT an AA plane. This is NOT silver. Not even close. Shadows or not. Camcorder or not. Distance is irrelevant. This is NOT silver. Period.
And thanks for that conclusive determination about what that which spot actually is.
Obviously it is the sun off of the windows of the plane.
Of course.
How ridiculous of us to consider many other possibilities without first asking you since you are the final word in all matters. No need for you to explain how you decided what it actually is.
Please forgive us.
October 2nd, 2009 at 5:27 pm
Hey genious,
If a reflection from the sun hitting the cockpit and hitting the building hold water, then why if the light still on the building when the plane is in the shadow and no sunlight can hit the cockpit?
Yet, a big silver plane looks green before and after it enters the shadow.
tky4ever Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 5:40 pm
Good observation HoLYWaR, not to mention that the light continues on top of the fireball after the plane hit the tower. Guess that cockpit window was ejected on impact and continued the exact same trajectory.
October 2nd, 2009 at 5:33 pm
Furthermore Genius,
Please find the plane that hit the WTC2 here.
http://www.airliners.net/searc.....20Airlines
And let me know how a silver plane with Blue and Red AA markings could be confused with a olive drab jet with no markings.
Your “The sun causes the reflection but the shadow makes a silver, red, and blue plane look olive green it buls---. Therefore, you sir, are a f---ing idiot.
You Lose.
You get nothing.
Good day sir.
October 2nd, 2009 at 6:04 pm
dirk ,
you are full of bingoooooos………!
i agree with you 100 000% and i would like to buy you a ton of european brewed beers !
20 years after jfk and still no truth about it .
8 years after 9/11 and …. ?
the cia and the nsa surely do a hell of a job for their country !
JFK was the last real president in the US .
JFK was orderd to kill by L. Johnson ( vice president under JFK )
and finaly executed by the CIA with a little help from the NY Mafia .
god bless the zionists,CIA,NSA and surely the lately Blackwater !
traitors to their own country should be hanged by the balls in public until they rot and stink .
Sparky Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 7:39 pm
Nonsense that there is “still no truth” about the JFK murder.
In 1977 there was a special Senate Select Committee on Assassinations which determined that there was indeed a “conspiracy” in the murder of JFK with a 95% certainty. However you will never hear about this in the MSM and the government still officially is flogging the lone gunman theory.
the logic of truth Reply:
October 3rd, 2009 at 3:48 am
1977 ?
and who knows that and how many of your fellow americans know about that ?
nonsense ?
the majority counts my friend !
nobody cares if you read that or know about it , the farmer in the southern states might stone you for a statement like that !
they voted G.W. Bush for president for not allowing gay marriage .
you live in a country full of ignorants .
got that ?
the logic of truth Reply:
October 3rd, 2009 at 3:52 am
hey sparky want something about JFK your only real president of late ?
check this :
http://www.sott.net/articles/s.....of-History
there are 12 parts of it !
good research !
October 2nd, 2009 at 7:17 pm
Core of Corruption is a documentary film series which details a comprehensive investigation into clandestine intelligence operations and conspiracies. The project is surfacing exclusive whistle blowers, insiders and critical evidence for the very first time. Over 2,000 hours of credible network news clips have been surfaced for this ground breaking event, most of which have never been seen since they aired and have never been available on the internet. Some of the video news segments for this project, when requested from the networks, were denied access to and corporate representatives would say that the information sought does not exist or has been misplaced. Someone doesn’t want the public to see these stories, that when put together, establish a conspiracy of the magnitude that could change the way one views the world. Countless millions of people are being manipulated and lied to by a network of individuals within government that work on behalf of private interests. The individuals were involved in the terrorist attacks of September 11th. Many of those same figures are are connected to historical events that have shaped our understanding of government crime. For instance, the Iran Contra affair involved many figures that showed up in the 9/11 attacks
http://video.google.com/videop.....amp;hl=en#
October 2nd, 2009 at 7:35 pm
To all those that BELIEVE you can identify the plane as a something other than the PASSENGER JET that it is YOU ARE A MIS/DISINFO AGENT polluting the truth movement. NUTTERS.
Sparky Reply:
October 2nd, 2009 at 7:52 pm
Please tell us how you determined that it is in fact a passenger jet and how this “pollutes the truth movement”.
I will agree with you however if your argument is that it is irrelevant since all 3 buildings were brought down by explosions and this is where the focus should lie. What did or did not hit the buildings is really only a distraction from the strongest smoking gun evidence that is the explosions, collapse and WTC7.
PrivateSi Reply:
October 3rd, 2009 at 4:52 am
The footage is not good enough to determine EXACTLY what plane it is so SPECULATING is daft – BUT FUN.
SPECULATING the REFLECTION moving across the glass fronted building is caused by a LASER is again daft – BUT FUN. A laser is a VERY THING beam of light and the REFLECTION is LARGE. I could speculate it’s from the plane’s NOSE LIGHT.
We’re no experts. I just wish more people would use the CONDITIONAL (ie. COULD be) instead of saying something DEFINITELY IS when there are obvious doubts.
I agree 9/11 was an INSIDE JOB – as to how far up the command chain the infiltration went no 1 can tell for sure (or certainly won’t if they could). Many people (we all know who) should have been prosecuted for INCOMPETENCE / GROSS NEGLIGENCE at the very least – And again for the ILLEGAL WAR IN IRAQ.
free me Reply:
October 3rd, 2009 at 12:25 pm
FUN.?..NOT FUN. SOMETHING, BUT NOT FUN.
PrivateSi Reply:
October 5th, 2009 at 3:17 am
If not ENJOYABLE then why do people speculate, do they like the BUZZ from argument or from people agreeing with them, the CONVERSATION or is it just an OBSESSION?
Looks like a large piece of POLYSTYRENE floating in front of the building?? I can’t tell what plane it is from this footage (or any footage) but I don’t believe the OFFICIAL story..
October 2nd, 2009 at 8:45 pm
Do you see a big silver plane with AA on the tail running through a piece of paper?
If so, it means that you are so f---ing dense, that light bends around your f---ing head because if that plan was a big silver AA plane like the one in the link above, at some point you could see a hint of silver, red, or blue or the AA would appear on the tail. The plane is canted as it enters the building, however you can still see the plane from tip to tail.
Conclusion: Light bends around your head or you are colorblind.
I’m done. Obama loves you and will pay your bills for you so no worries.
October 3rd, 2009 at 1:24 am
i love it when everybody is an expert. keep up the great insight backed with your amazing undisputable facts. i just cant believe why none of you guys run for office and make a change and have a real investigation into the hologram remote controlled unmanned al quada sleeper cell funded missle plane. thank everything that is good for you guys. and just so you know the militairy has been developing paper lazers for decades. they have been hiding them in the mass graves and fema camps in kenya. but remember as usual its all the jews fault.
October 3rd, 2009 at 1:28 am
It does not look like any commercial plane I’ve ever seen it almost looks like a UAV
October 3rd, 2009 at 3:07 am
wooow i tottally saw the laser its about 10 floors lower then the plane and arcs up towards where the plane hits in the middle…. crazy
October 3rd, 2009 at 11:36 am
well with a little research, i was able to download the video and play it frame by frame…
Laser theory… im not an expert, but if thats a piece of paper… its a pretty freaking huge! In comparison to the plane its about the size of one of the engines! Like someone posted before… look at your remotes LED through your digital camera while pressing some buttons. there is truth to the laser not being seen by the ‘naked eye’ but a camera would possibly pick that up. It would be interesting to compare footage to see if that ‘debris or paper’ is visible.
Honestly speaking, there is no way you can make out any domestic markings on the plane. the video just isnt clear enough
There IS a flash before the plane hits
Again not an expert, but why the delay of explosion? Is jet fuel not highly explosive? its literally 2-3 seconds after the plane enters the building before any explosion. Has anyone commented on this before? Also a question that maybe some one should ask…what color does burn? in comparison to other explosive materials. and do the colors match? because personally, I have never seen any red fireball like that before at camp.
Randy Reply:
October 4th, 2009 at 10:57 am
I worked at NASA, Edwards, Ca. and we crashed an airliner into some huge “can openers” on our lakebed to test some jet fuel modifications that were supposed to supress fireballs in a crash. Yes, the fireball was huge and red, just like this one. The fuel mod was not effective.
But that only proves that the aircraft in this video had jet fuel onboard, and does not necessarily exclude the possibility of other explosives.
By the way, after ALL the fuel had burned off, there was still plenty of airplane intact, fuselage, seats, electronic gear, flight recorder and all. Why didn’t it all melt like the steel structure of the WTC?
PrivateSi Reply:
October 5th, 2009 at 3:20 am
PIECE OF POLYSTYRENE (or some other kind of light foam) floating about from previous impact and the DELAY is caused by the fact THE FUEL IS IN THE WINGS! I agree the OFFICIAL STORY leaves out IMPORTANT ASPECTS and contains some BS but so does the ALTERNATIVE SPECULATION.
October 3rd, 2009 at 12:57 pm
Good points.
Of all the videos I have seen of planes crashing into the ground, they explode as soon as they hit the deck. In this video the entire plane, nose to tail, enters the building before exploding.
So, was the building soft enough to allow the plane to fly through the wall yet hard enough to prevent it from flying out the other side?
Also, the force of the explosion alone blew the huge gapping holes but not one piece of shrapnel from the either plane was blown out with it. Meanwhile on the White House lawn engines and plane pieces were everywhere.
PrivateSi Reply:
October 5th, 2009 at 3:21 am
FUEL IS IN THE WINGS, OTHER IMPACTS ARE BELLY 1ST, NOT NOSE 1ST.
PrivateSi Reply:
October 5th, 2009 at 3:22 am
I AM NOT MAD DOG – just left the caps on (BTW)!!
October 3rd, 2009 at 1:45 pm
THERE WERE NO COMMERCIAL PLANES, BOATS OR TAXIS ON 9/11, THE GOVT DID IT
woof,woof
October 3rd, 2009 at 4:38 pm
right now I don’t think it will even matter, even if they get a new investigation, the people in POWER are there because they control things……they will control the investigation too. When Nixon was impeached he did so much less undercover than what Bush did OPENLY and I’m not even going to start on OBAMANIAC (the liar) And I VOTED for him. I am so disgusted today with the whole mess. We will never be able to take back our country without withholding our tax money. They keep us so broke! We are slaves. I’m backing the boycott/ stay at home day October 15th. In fact I think everyone should withdraw their money from the banks, stockpile their food and water and stay home until new elections are held all around. With paper ballots!! Oh by the way… no one is covering this….. FDIC is broke. So, if you do have any money in the bank….. well, good for you first but my condolences second.
October 3rd, 2009 at 5:39 pm
That “laser” you’re on about painting the building is a piece of paper like the ones which fall later in the film.
bullsh!t Reply:
October 3rd, 2009 at 9:26 pm
A piece of paper is 8.5″ * 11″
Inches! The size of your D**k.
And you can see it from miles away.
Logically! – think about it
PrivateSi Reply:
October 5th, 2009 at 3:23 am
LARGE PIECE OF FOAM??
October 3rd, 2009 at 6:35 pm
I agree that JFK was the last real president of the USA. Every man following has been esentially a puppet for corproate America. 9/11 very well could have been constructed by some rogue element of the US government, however, this video proves nothing.
I see a silver airplane that appears gray because it’s in the shadow of the Tower. I see a blue tail. When the engines of the plane are in the sun, they are shiney and reflective.
After taking another look at the light on the building, it might not be a reflection off the plane. I think a reflection would get smaller and more focused as the plane got close to the building. But the sun is clearly off the right of the picture based on the shadows of the buildings. If the sun is to the right, pointing directly across the picture, it’s possible that the plane’s window reflected the light back onto the building, but this video is inconclusive.
But that doesn’t automatically make the spot a laser, guiding an unmanned drone aircraft. That’s a huge leap.
Another point: Alex Jones needs to stop trying to sell himself in his videos. I watched one on 9/11 and the first 15 minutes was only people sucking Alex Jones’ d*ck. Alex Jones this, AJ that, blah blah. The penultimate shot was of him standing in front of an American flag, hands on his hips, chest out proud. I almost gagged. His work would get a lot more credibility if he wasn’t so blatantly trying to sell himself as a product.
October 4th, 2009 at 4:23 am
That small beam of light was not a piece of paper. The south tower was hit about 45 minutes after the north tower was hit and all of the debris from the north tower had already settled.
Randy Reply:
October 4th, 2009 at 10:45 am
Oh my gosh!
I thought it was a piece of paper, but a piece of paper would have to be GIGANTIC to show up like that! It seems to me to be a light, and NOT being beamed by the airplane itself. Which makes me think that the plane was remotely guided by the beam.
Also, what comercial airliner has a big POD near the rear of the fuselage, ahead of the stablizer?
October 4th, 2009 at 12:59 pm
that light definately comes down at a sharp vertical angle. it is also uniform with the bldg’s surface.
paper? nothing but light can do that. also the timing suggests guidance.
but then, hey. every detail of this job was pretty clumsy for folk with inf resourses.
also i dont care if i could see it was a commercial flight.
i know that americans (that booked that flight) were murdered on the ground.
PrivateSi Reply:
October 5th, 2009 at 3:24 am
REFLECTION of plane’s NOSE LIGHT??
October 4th, 2009 at 2:50 pm
Why did the ‘plane’ at the Pentagon penetrate steel and concrete much more efficiently (three rings at an acute angle I understand)than the south tower ‘plane’?
October 4th, 2009 at 6:50 pm
Whom ever was holding the laser that marked the Tower as it’s target.. should be shot in the face immediately
October 5th, 2009 at 1:06 am
as much as I wish this was something shockingly incriminating, i have to admit that i don’t believe it.
it looks like a piece of debris that floats across our field of vision.
i believe in 9/11 truth. i believe the truth is as yet unknown. however, to gain credibility, we can’t subscribe to every new theory that comes around. we have to set ourselves above misinformation, even if it appears to help our cause. We have to be scrupulously and vigilantly attentive to the Truth.
We have to be tougher on ourselves than the opposition is. Let us uncover the truth.
I just don’t believe that this particular piece of film gets us any closer to the truth.
Back to the drawing board, people. This is no reason to give up.
October 5th, 2009 at 3:37 am
what is the flash???
October 5th, 2009 at 8:56 am
I went frame by frame and can see what appears to be a dot of light that moves like a spot of light from a flashlight would if you tried to hold it on a far a way point in that your subtle body movements would be magnified and although the light would stay close to the spot you were shining it on, it would giggle around from your small movements. That’s what that dot of light seems to do. Then it vanishes a split second before the plane enters the frame and hits the building very close to where the dot of light was just shining. Also, when you freeze the video at :06 the nose of the plane is just visible but it is blurred. However, it does resemble a military aircraft because it looks like the nose is cone shaped and comes to a point almost like fighter jets. Mybe that’s from the blurring of the video, I don’t know. Regardless of whether or not this goes for or against some thoery about 911 does not make me a “disinfo agent.” I agree 100% that 911 was an inside job, but I’m only pointing out what I see after looking at it for a while frame by frame (not litterally, but by pausing it as fast as possible to see the shortest incriments possible). It does look like a laser or some other type of light was used to pinpoint the impact area. That just adds a lot of evidence that there was government involvement.
October 5th, 2009 at 2:00 pm
JFK was killed by William Greer the driver of the limo he was shot it…google “William Copper JFK” and see for yourself. And if you frame by frame this video…watch where the plane supposedly makes impact…it looks like the plane vanished inside the building…but the impact point on the building doesnt show damage until after the fireball explosion…I dont believe in the no planes theory, but the video makes me think twice about it. Power to the People!
October 5th, 2009 at 4:28 pm
Does it seem peculiar to anyone but me that the photographer zooms in precisely on the impact location even though a plane was coming in from the left? Why is that? You’d think he might have turned his camera towards the enormous, screaming jet on its way in… but nope… got a close up of the target instead. Interesting.
October 5th, 2009 at 5:05 pm
this video is bogus! that chick is way too calm! Phony BS!!!! This is a total SCAM! more propaganda and LIES!!!
October 6th, 2009 at 12:54 am
Thunder and lightening are five seconds apart at sea level. There are at least four blacks separating the camera from the WTC tower, yet the sound of the crash is simultaneous with the contact. Someone needs to take a physics lesson, this is not possible in the real world, there should have been at least one and a half second delay. Question is the sound track advanced? The video is presented as amateur which eliminate that scenario. Was the sound track over dubbed with another? Was the whole thing some more BS that is intended to fool the nonthinkers that let Fox News do all their thinking for them and at the same time occupy the fore front of debate to detract the thinkers from something more immediate and current? If it was a fake and there was no plane with people on board, people died. If it was a real plane with people on board, people still died. One way or the other the debate is pointless at this time.
pastor dean Reply:
October 6th, 2009 at 1:40 am
I must apologize for not proof reading my post. there are at least four BLOCKS separating…
Okay so it looks like a plane, I meant to say real passenger plane with people on board.
October 6th, 2009 at 3:41 am
Anyone else notice the single engines on the wings, not two? A 747 has two on each side separated before the wing and on the wing.
http://airlinersgallery.files......k-bdlr.jpg
JFC, U MORON GARY, AT LEAST U REMOVED UR AVATAR Reply:
October 9th, 2009 at 5:19 pm
767-222, u f---in div
October 6th, 2009 at 8:36 am
I guess you guys all figured out that the white light is part of the weapon/targeting guidance systems. We have all seen the videos of the IRAQ attacks where they first shine a laser down at the target, and the bomb follows the laser. Same thing. Proof that it was an inside job.
October 6th, 2009 at 11:32 am
One engine on each wing
Versus
Two engines on each wing
October 6th, 2009 at 4:48 pm
That flash you see under the plane and then on the building face just before the plane enters the building is a missile that breaches the facade for the fuselage. Without that breach, plane parts, –wings, tail pieces, etc. — would have broken off at impact and rained to the ground and identified it for the ringer it was. The plane fired a missile which you see coming out the other side of the building, loaded with napalm to up the shock and awe. Some want to know why somebody hasn’t come forward. How many do you think have been dispatched already? Engineers, remote controllers, demolitionists. NWO s---balls know who their minions are. They’re either dead already, or know they will be even if they’re suspected of turning in their corpocracy paymasters.
October 6th, 2009 at 5:03 pm
Sorry I confused this video with the first plane hitting the first tower, where the flash is clear in front and points the way or breaches the facade. For this second video, that “piece of paper” would need to be bigger than any bed sheet. It may be subterfuge as many here have suggested. The glee with which horror clowns did this job — check out the Israeli “Art” students filming and high-fiving from the white van — seems to be outdone only by the glee of their neverending disinfo. I see the CIA’s worm mouthpiece Gerald Posner is still trumpeting his “Case Closed” horses--- on the History Channel. Look for him to write a book “debunking” all the “conspiracy theories” for Sept 11, 2001. The control of media is a monster hurdle. I’ll see you all in the camps. I’ll be the guy they machine gun as he tries to climb the barbed wire. I’ll be grateful dead, away from these assholes killing everything that’s ever been true or beautiful in this world.
October 6th, 2009 at 7:41 pm
Someone should find the operator of the camera and ask if they still have any of the pages of paper they are seen holding. Would there not be chemical traces of the napalm, thermite, or missile explosives on them that have been indicated by some theories?
Peace be with you,
Rabboni T ReVealer
October 6th, 2009 at 10:22 pm
I’ve read the comments about the “flash” just before the plane hits. I do see the flash, but it looks like the nose hitting the building, too pixelated to see clearly. I’d like to see the original video before it was re-encoded to FLASH. I can’t say I see any “lasers” though, plus I don’t think the ones that “paint” a target are visible to the naked eye. Might tip off the enemy wouldn’t it?
Side note: I use firefox and the extension “downloadhelper” will let you download and play the video frame by frame (KM Player works well with flash on it’s own).
October 6th, 2009 at 11:12 pm
The buildings were demo’d – that’s obvious. There is also a possibility that tritium based micro-nukes were used in order to accelerate the collapse.
October 7th, 2009 at 3:36 am
White ORB from 00.03 to 00.06
October 7th, 2009 at 4:01 am
http://c2.ac-images.myspacecdn.....f6a749.jpg
October 7th, 2009 at 8:39 am
pause at :49 – :50 ..whats that lil black thing flying across the screen top left( shills relax not saying it is anything just wondering what it could be) hmmm?
October 7th, 2009 at 11:22 am
I have watched the footage three times and I saw alot of paper.I didnot see any lasers but I did see something black coming across in the back ground it appeared to me to be an aircraft.But I could be wrong.I showed it to my 13yr old.She agrees also.
As far as footage goes I like the 9/11 eyewitness.It is very good and it also goes against the pancake theory that PBS was showing.Also I believe that thermite was used to bring the buildings down.The ones that built these buildings have continually said that these buildings could take multiple airplane collisions.
October 7th, 2009 at 3:34 pm
That is 1 scary video! thanks for posting!
October 7th, 2009 at 9:18 pm
Wow! I thought there was supposed to be a superimposed airplane somewhere. I just have one question, where was this video all along. I have seen a lot (too much) about the whole 911 thing and I have never seen this angle before. Who shot this? Didn’t they know that this is the video which trumps the superimposed plane idea? I dunno. I guess there is still a plane missing altogether for WTC 7—it just fell. I hope this is not an OP—it just seems way late in getting here.
Richie
October 8th, 2009 at 12:50 pm
What’s easier to believe 19 hijackers did 911 or obama got electa president
October 8th, 2009 at 4:03 pm
if you look reeealllly closely you can clearly see that it says “Titanic” on the side and is a very huge boat that flies into the ice-coated-building (grey because the ice is dirty). If you also use the new software called “ZoomTHisYouF*ck” you can also see naked people dancing inside the boat to hideous old-people-music so STFU.
October 8th, 2009 at 5:36 pm
for all the people who still believe in the conspiracies how do you explain the videos of Taliban and al queda members celebrating and burning US flags after the towers were hit? With all the hatred that they have for Americans, it shouldn’t even be a surprise that they attacked us.
October 9th, 2009 at 12:36 am
man am I disappointed. you people are seriously thinking this was a gov’t conspiracy?
It was a f’ing piece of paper. The military doesn’t use laser pointers like someone doing a presentaion. IT IS NOT VISIBLE. How stupid would it be for the military to use visible laser light to “paint” a target? Wouldn’t you think it would take away from the element of surprise?
BTW, do you realise the size and scope of a mission if this were government. How long this would have had to been planned? It would have had to been planned under CLinton and carried out under Bush. And you seriously think that many people can keep a secret that big for 8 years?
Damn, you are some seriously delussional people.
I had high hopes for this site. Very disappointing.
also, there are 100’s on family members who’s loved ones were on those planes, the government got all of these people to lie and keep it secret for 8 years? come on people use some common damn sense.
October 9th, 2009 at 12:42 am
Is it just me or did that plane look military in nature?
It looked like it had forward facing rear wings.
October 9th, 2009 at 12:46 am
and whoever the idiot is that says it took 2 seconds for the firball to appear, the timer on the video is turning from 5 to 6 when the plane hits and is still on 6 when the flames blow out of the side of the building.
as far as the time it takes for the debris to float across the face of the building, the winds at nearly 1000ft in the air are blowing upwards of 50-60 mph.
and some of you are now experts on the color of flames involved when jet fuel ignites?
while I’m at it, the conspirators were also able to get air-traffic controllers in several major cities to lie about what planes were involved and kkep their secret for 8 years? NUT JOBS!
October 9th, 2009 at 10:31 am
Look into other utube vidoes. You can see the background is missing in one video, you can see BBC reporting that building 7 fell when it is still visible in the background. Both sides can see what they want to see. As for me, I see 911 as a starting point. I mean over 50% of the people still believe that we should be in the middle East. The terrorist do not have planes, navies, ect. So pay more attention to immigration and border security and pull the troops before we go bankrupt. HAHA. Using 911 as a starting point the govt has taken away more freedom and made it possible to declare Martial Law for no reason at all. Just look at all the dumbs--- and Barry Sotero gets a Nobel Peace? Geneoligist shows that Michelle Obama is a slave desendent but we cannot see a Long Form Birth Certificate for Barry? If you have not questioned the direction our country since 911 it most likely indicates that you are alot like me. As a Marine I swore to protect this country and as a vet I don’t see the Govt. returning the favor.
It is disgusting to think that you take the Pledge of Alligence out of schools, you take god out of schools, and you replace it with tolerence for chicks with dicks and Barry Barack Sotero Obama worship, you appoint a safe school czar(with no constitutional authority) to peddle this trash into the classroom. The path that the government has charted for us and our children will be paved with the bleached bones of Patriots and dumbasses. Starting with 911.
thinkdontreact Reply:
October 9th, 2009 at 8:09 pm
And sadly this is called evolution. Good write! I say for every so many evolutions
you get a revolution and its way over due…
October 9th, 2009 at 11:14 am
It’s the reflection of the plane coming towards the building. How does she know to zoom in to the tower right before it hits though?
October 9th, 2009 at 12:22 pm
R U serious? That was the same stock footage they have been showing us for years before.
How many years are they going to show the ‘evil doers’ going across the jungle gym thing as well?
<<<<<<for all the people who still believe in the conspiracies how do you explain the videos of Taliban and al queda members celebrating and burning US flags after the towers were hit? With all the hatred that they have for Americans, it shouldn’t even be a surprise that they attacked us.<<<<<<<<<<
thinkdontreact Reply:
October 10th, 2009 at 3:08 pm
Personally, I would celebrate as well if an enemy of mine was killed
and I had NOTHING to do with it. So nice try.
October 9th, 2009 at 12:31 pm
If you get pause it just right at 6 seconds you can see the flash that everyone talks about. Does that mean it was a bomb? We’ll never know.
October 9th, 2009 at 1:07 pm
Search other WTC2 videos and don’t see the “reflection” in any of them.
October 9th, 2009 at 4:30 pm
I can’t believe all the lasers shining on #7 at the 1 minute mark. No wonder that building fell too!
October 9th, 2009 at 5:23 pm
It’s a bird, that’s flying much much closer to the camera than the building…. after the explosion you can see it keep flying in front of the grey building in the forefront. It is the only object seen in front of the other building, and it has a pulsing variance in brightness due to the reflection of the sunlight punctuated by the flapping of its wings.
October 9th, 2009 at 10:11 pm
To “showme bby”, I’m sure you’re just being a jackass, but anyway…when a target is “painted” it isn’t by any visible light. Visible to the naked eye that is.
October 10th, 2009 at 3:52 am
part of the sound was obviously edited in. you can hear a kind of crashing sound the very second the plane flies into the WTC, even though this was filmed from a mile or more away. remember children, sound does NOT travel as fast as light
October 10th, 2009 at 12:40 pm
There is no conspiracy, do something productive with your lives.
thinkdontreact Reply:
October 10th, 2009 at 3:58 pm
Three building collapsing straight down, yeah right.
As far as doing something constructive? We could say
the same to you. Why are you here? Go do something
constructive.
October 10th, 2009 at 5:51 pm
50 reasons Obama should NOT win the Nobel Peace Prize:
http://joshfulton.blogspot.com.....ll_10.html
October 10th, 2009 at 11:38 pm
The filming person knew, that the plane is gone hit the tower. Almost like the Gaudet-Footage, she zooms right before the planes hit in the right position where its gone hit, so that we dont see almost nothing of the plane.
October 11th, 2009 at 2:10 am
Check this out!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yu_moia-oVI
October 11th, 2009 at 5:29 am
your all looking at the wrong place, not the large white PAPER thing but just below where the nose hits there is a darker dot that stays stationary the whole time.. pause it and look before the plane hits where the nose is heading!
October 11th, 2009 at 12:05 pm
Who cares the type of Plane, thermite is the loaded gun.
http://www.aztlan.net/protocols.htm
October 14th, 2009 at 12:16 pm
how do you people leave your houses? seems you would be scared to do anything. you know mad cow disease is ethnic cleansing plan created by the nwo. seriously. get on with real life. you will live your life and you will die and that will be it. try enjoying it rather than looking for problems in it.
October 14th, 2009 at 11:36 pm
If you look closely, that thing that some people are claiming to be a laser sight moving across the face of the building is just a piece of paper fluttering in the breeze from the first building. you will also see others away from the building behaving in the same manner…… still doesn’t change the facts though… these were remote controlled planes used as missiles
finally after 8+ years people are waking up to this scam and the NWO faster than ever but there are still too many plugged into the system. The time will soon come that 9/11, the thing that gave them so much power will will become the ultimate destruction of the NWO. The house of cards is looking shaky