Comments on: New York Times Hypes Border Violence by “Rogue Militia”

By: emmanuel jackson

emmanuel jackson — Mon, 06 Jul 2009 14:40:25 +0000

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v.....annel_page

By: William of OC

William of OC — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 18:33:32 +0000

The national government is using events like this one to prepare for civil war. Anyone who thinks the US is NOT headed for civil war, is a fool. This should be interesting.

By: KOSMOKARATOR

KOSMOKARATOR — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 15:05:19 +0000

Anger is a great force. If you control it, it can be transmuted into a power which can move the whole world.
Militia is a 3rd Amendment right. Anyone who opposes this is a traitor and enemy of the United States of America.

Individual citizens have the duty to violate domestic laws to prevent crimes against peace and humanity from occurring. Nuremberg War Crime Tribunal, 1950
Your countrymen have been murdered and the more you delve into it the more it looks as though they were murdered by our government, who used it as an excuse to murder other people thousands of miles away.

By: sydwayz

sydwayz — Fri, 03 Jul 2009 05:16:48 +0000

What is the militia? The term “militia” consists of two parts: the organized militia and the unorganized militia. According to the organic Maine Constitution and backed by the United States Code, the organized militia is the standing military force in the state (the “State Guard”) while the unorganized militia (which is commonly called the militia) consists of all other males between the ages of 17 and 45 (or 65 if they have prior military service). The militia was established for the purpose of defending the state (a sovereign nation) and the United States of America (a union of nations) from all enemies “foreign and domestic” based upon principles of community self defense established hundreds of years before the nation was formed. However, while the organized militia was tasked with the defenses of the states, our forefathers, having just fought their own government, did not place their entire trust in the government or a standing army to protect them but reserved the right and the means to protect themselves – thus the unorganized militia. The militia was and is a defensive body set up so that its members can take care of normal peace by internal lawless elements, or government usurpation of the rights and power of the people guaranteed by the Constitution, there is a group of people that owe their allegiance to no one except God and their fellow Americans who desire to remain free.

The mission and purpose of the militia have not changed. What has changed is the status of the organized militia. The “State Guard” with the duty and obligation of protecting the state is now under federal jurisdiction (the “National Guard”) thereby obligating it only to the federal government making the unorganized militia the only constitutional force available for the defense of the state.

By: XxxPURGATORYxxX

XxxPURGATORYxxX — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 15:28:54 +0000

The border will never be sealed up . Face it ppl !

BUT I would like to see a concrete wall built from one end to the next armed with guards ANYONE crosses it shoot on site.. that will help control it !

As for the militia all I can say is SUPPORT YOUR LOCAL MILITIA you will need em once martial law is declared !!!!!!!

The state guard is NOT and I repeat NOT the militia …..

By: Shadow Hawk

Shadow Hawk — Thu, 02 Jul 2009 01:02:19 +0000

Robert, I wasn’t being selective, I was trying to fathom, what the people who were Alledgedly attacked, were doing with firearms, if they had been Known to be involved with Drug Trafficking, And obviously charged at one time or the other, Then why as you so eloquently put it, the sheriff hadn’t had them in jail in the first place. IE, doing his job!

Basically, I was wondering the same thing you were! I just didn’t phrase it all out!

By: reconmarine

reconmarine — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 22:03:19 +0000

We must not resist to exist. We must be slaves. Cattle are happy, remember.

By: tamaraehawk

tamaraehawk — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 20:58:56 +0000

88 – 90% of the US population disagrees with the NYT

By: Robert

Robert — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:44:50 +0000

You have what’s similar to “selective listening” in that you only read what you want to read. Apparently, the Husband was, according to the Sheriff, “previously involved” with drugs. With that being said, the Sheriff wasn’t doing his job. If the husband was involved in drugs ( purchase, trade, sell, etc) why didn’t that guy get a warrant and arrest him?! Did he have some connection to the victim?! ( In case you don’t get it: I’m being sarcastic with the last sentence.)

By: Robert

Robert — Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:37:06 +0000

Hey, no black helicopters involved in this story buddy. Besides, you obviously can’t read or you would’ve read the article in it’s full content. Conspiracy theories that are off in left field don’t help our cause against the NWO!