
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Obama Administration Shuts Down 9/11 Families Lawsuit</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.infowars.com/obama-administration-shuts-down-911-families-lawsuit/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.infowars.com/obama-administration-shuts-down-911-families-lawsuit/</link>
	<description>Because there's a war on for your mind.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 04:35:46 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: NPT debunked</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/obama-administration-shuts-down-911-families-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-1165560</link>
		<dc:creator>NPT debunked</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 16:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=13064#comment-1165560</guid>
		<description>Look up September Clues-Busted!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look up September Clues-Busted!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NPT debunked</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/obama-administration-shuts-down-911-families-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-1165552</link>
		<dc:creator>NPT debunked</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 16:44:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=13064#comment-1165552</guid>
		<description>I have watched the beginning 20 minutes of September Clues and I already want to hit the stop button. Here are the issues I have with this film

Assumption#1

September CLues claims that the nose of the boeing 757 comes &quot;out&quot; the other side of the tower. This is a pure assumption. What makes anyone think it was the nose??? A 757 and I have been on one on more than one occassion is a huge airplane and the 400-500 miles per hour it was flying multiplied by its huge mass was enough to cause an explosion. The nose doesn&#039;t come out the &quot;other&quot; side as September Clues claims, it was the impact of the plane that blew the other side of the building!!!!!

Assumption # 2

September Clues says that it was a missile strike instead of the airplane. The theory behind this is that the plane shown flying into the tower from an aerial view was black and the plane from ground footage flying into the tower was white with no wings, therefore they can&#039;t be the same plane so it was a missile strike instead and the planes computer graphics.  This is just pure conjecture. Number one there is no proof that there was a missile strike coming from anywhere. If the NPT crowd is to say it was a missile strike then number 1 you have to have some kind of evidence it was a strike and number 2 you have to say where it came from. Neither of which have been provided. I am not going to lie and say they were different planes because I&#039;m not sure if the same color planes hit the two towers or they were different colors. Hard to say.

This film is very unconvincing to me. There are plenty Alex Jones films that do a better job.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have watched the beginning 20 minutes of September Clues and I already want to hit the stop button. Here are the issues I have with this film</p>
<p>Assumption#1</p>
<p>September CLues claims that the nose of the boeing 757 comes &#8220;out&#8221; the other side of the tower. This is a pure assumption. What makes anyone think it was the nose??? A 757 and I have been on one on more than one occassion is a huge airplane and the 400-500 miles per hour it was flying multiplied by its huge mass was enough to cause an explosion. The nose doesn&#8217;t come out the &#8220;other&#8221; side as September Clues claims, it was the impact of the plane that blew the other side of the building!!!!!</p>
<p>Assumption # 2</p>
<p>September Clues says that it was a missile strike instead of the airplane. The theory behind this is that the plane shown flying into the tower from an aerial view was black and the plane from ground footage flying into the tower was white with no wings, therefore they can&#8217;t be the same plane so it was a missile strike instead and the planes computer graphics.  This is just pure conjecture. Number one there is no proof that there was a missile strike coming from anywhere. If the NPT crowd is to say it was a missile strike then number 1 you have to have some kind of evidence it was a strike and number 2 you have to say where it came from. Neither of which have been provided. I am not going to lie and say they were different planes because I&#8217;m not sure if the same color planes hit the two towers or they were different colors. Hard to say.</p>
<p>This film is very unconvincing to me. There are plenty Alex Jones films that do a better job.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: urindenial</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/obama-administration-shuts-down-911-families-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-1165406</link>
		<dc:creator>urindenial</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 15:23:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=13064#comment-1165406</guid>
		<description>There were witnesses in the North and South Tower on that day who said they HEARD and some SAW airplanes coming at them before they were evacuated. There has also been some independent footage about the airplanes apart from CNN, FOX, etc.
I will check out September Clues though..you seem pretty convinced about this theory..I&#039;m not so sure...I do believe they were taken down through controlled demolition either way planes or no planes (they could have been remote controlled) 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB we can agree on that</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There were witnesses in the North and South Tower on that day who said they HEARD and some SAW airplanes coming at them before they were evacuated. There has also been some independent footage about the airplanes apart from CNN, FOX, etc.<br />
I will check out September Clues though..you seem pretty convinced about this theory..I&#8217;m not so sure&#8230;I do believe they were taken down through controlled demolition either way planes or no planes (they could have been remote controlled) 9/11 WAS AN INSIDE JOB we can agree on that</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lovelost</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/obama-administration-shuts-down-911-families-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-1165003</link>
		<dc:creator>lovelost</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 05:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=13064#comment-1165003</guid>
		<description>Q:  &quot;The thing is there were planes on 9/11 because of independent video&quot;

A:  Never in the history of aviation crash investigations has video or home movies proven or verified a plane.  Only wreckage verifies a plane or plane crash.  Not one single SPECK of debris from any of the 4 planes from any of the 4 locations has ever been verified by anyone on the planet.  There were no commercial planes on 9/11.  The video excuse is used regularly.  Simply watch September Clues or learn more about the exact people who took these so called independent videos.

Q: &quot;independent video collected on that day&quot;

A:  good point.  No &quot;independent video&quot; was shown on the day OF 9/11.  Every single video was played AFTER the FBI vetted every single one.  I like the way you say &quot;collected&quot;.  You know damn well that the FBI, SS, NSA, and Fema agents were all at ground zero going around confiscating (collecting) eveyones film and cameras just in case someone took a picture of something that wasnt a commercial plane! 

Q:  &quot;it is not feasable to believe the planes were holograms and video trickery.

A:  Who said anything about holograms of trickery?  There were no commercial planes on 9/11.  Who knows what these murderers did to accomplish their crimes.  I don’t care.  I’ll leave that to the historians and investigators.  There were no commercial planes on 9/11. 

Q:  “those terrorists had to be on the plane”

A:  There were no commercial planes on 9/11.  There was no plane for the men to be on before they could become terrorists?  Also you cannot be a passenger on a plane that has never been verified.  No plane means no passengers.

Q:  “if it was remote controlled where is the proof to that???”

A:  There will never be any proof of that because there were no commercial planes on 9/11.  Many use video and photos to “prove” the remote excuse.  There were no commercial planes on 9/11.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Q:  &#8220;The thing is there were planes on 9/11 because of independent video&#8221;</p>
<p>A:  Never in the history of aviation crash investigations has video or home movies proven or verified a plane.  Only wreckage verifies a plane or plane crash.  Not one single SPECK of debris from any of the 4 planes from any of the 4 locations has ever been verified by anyone on the planet.  There were no commercial planes on 9/11.  The video excuse is used regularly.  Simply watch September Clues or learn more about the exact people who took these so called independent videos.</p>
<p>Q: &#8220;independent video collected on that day&#8221;</p>
<p>A:  good point.  No &#8220;independent video&#8221; was shown on the day OF 9/11.  Every single video was played AFTER the FBI vetted every single one.  I like the way you say &#8220;collected&#8221;.  You know damn well that the FBI, SS, NSA, and Fema agents were all at ground zero going around confiscating (collecting) eveyones film and cameras just in case someone took a picture of something that wasnt a commercial plane! </p>
<p>Q:  &#8220;it is not feasable to believe the planes were holograms and video trickery.</p>
<p>A:  Who said anything about holograms of trickery?  There were no commercial planes on 9/11.  Who knows what these murderers did to accomplish their crimes.  I don’t care.  I’ll leave that to the historians and investigators.  There were no commercial planes on 9/11. </p>
<p>Q:  “those terrorists had to be on the plane”</p>
<p>A:  There were no commercial planes on 9/11.  There was no plane for the men to be on before they could become terrorists?  Also you cannot be a passenger on a plane that has never been verified.  No plane means no passengers.</p>
<p>Q:  “if it was remote controlled where is the proof to that???”</p>
<p>A:  There will never be any proof of that because there were no commercial planes on 9/11.  Many use video and photos to “prove” the remote excuse.  There were no commercial planes on 9/11.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: oknowwhat</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/obama-administration-shuts-down-911-families-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-1164983</link>
		<dc:creator>oknowwhat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 04:58:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=13064#comment-1164983</guid>
		<description>The world is knowing that there were no commercial planes on 9-11.  Exactly how did the CIA and Mossad conduct the attacks since there were no commercial planes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The world is knowing that there were no commercial planes on 9-11.  Exactly how did the CIA and Mossad conduct the attacks since there were no commercial planes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: refreshing</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/obama-administration-shuts-down-911-families-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-1164979</link>
		<dc:creator>refreshing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 04:54:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=13064#comment-1164979</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad you are going with the &quot;passenger/highjacker&quot; excuses.  Go away from the tired &quot;witnesses, home movies, video, photos&quot; aspect of denial of 9/11.  There were no commercial planes on 9/11.  A major aspect of coming to terms with the truth that there were no commercial planes on 9/11 is that the US media may have lied to you.  The US media corporations are owned and staffed by the top US military corporations.  These military corporations have profited into the trillions of dollars because of 9/11.  What you were shown on 9/11 by these very same corporations may not have been the truth.  There were no highjackers on 9/11 because there were no commercial planes.

For an introduction watch &quot;September Clues&quot; online.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad you are going with the &#8220;passenger/highjacker&#8221; excuses.  Go away from the tired &#8220;witnesses, home movies, video, photos&#8221; aspect of denial of 9/11.  There were no commercial planes on 9/11.  A major aspect of coming to terms with the truth that there were no commercial planes on 9/11 is that the US media may have lied to you.  The US media corporations are owned and staffed by the top US military corporations.  These military corporations have profited into the trillions of dollars because of 9/11.  What you were shown on 9/11 by these very same corporations may not have been the truth.  There were no highjackers on 9/11 because there were no commercial planes.</p>
<p>For an introduction watch &#8220;September Clues&#8221; online.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: To Alex</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/obama-administration-shuts-down-911-families-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-1164969</link>
		<dc:creator>To Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 04:39:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=13064#comment-1164969</guid>
		<description>Alex and gang:::  I like the fact that some people put up a larger message like the one above.  It really makes a statement.  Now if they take up more than page then no.  Just saying that sometimes people need to really &quot;see&quot; the statement.  For example....compare the above post to.....impeach obama.  Which one gets the message across?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alex and gang:::  I like the fact that some people put up a larger message like the one above.  It really makes a statement.  Now if they take up more than page then no.  Just saying that sometimes people need to really &#8220;see&#8221; the statement.  For example&#8230;.compare the above post to&#8230;..impeach obama.  Which one gets the message across?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: huh?</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/obama-administration-shuts-down-911-families-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-1164967</link>
		<dc:creator>huh?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 04:36:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=13064#comment-1164967</guid>
		<description>There were no commercial planes on 9/11.  The war on terror and terrorists is based on a lie.  If anything the Saudi&#039;s should be suing the US?  Why has Iran kept silent about the truth that there were no commercial planes on 9/11?  It makes me think they are in on it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There were no commercial planes on 9/11.  The war on terror and terrorists is based on a lie.  If anything the Saudi&#8217;s should be suing the US?  Why has Iran kept silent about the truth that there were no commercial planes on 9/11?  It makes me think they are in on it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: workers comp settlement</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/obama-administration-shuts-down-911-families-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-1154050</link>
		<dc:creator>workers comp settlement</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 07:48:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=13064#comment-1154050</guid>
		<description>How do I add this to my RSS reader? Sorry I&#039;m a newbie :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How do I add this to my RSS reader? Sorry I&#8217;m a newbie <img src='http://www.infowars.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Not On My Watch</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/obama-administration-shuts-down-911-families-lawsuit/comment-page-1/#comment-1153759</link>
		<dc:creator>Not On My Watch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 05:04:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=13064#comment-1153759</guid>
		<description>You actually think the Govenment is going to Impeach ITSELF?Or Purge their own evil asses from the Thrones of Power you gave them? You give some teenager a gun and find out he has violent tendencies.You really think &quot;ASKING&quot; will get that gun back? The difference here is that by the time people get off their asses and FORCIBLY change  things these fuckers will have used Your money to build a Deathstar and you won&#039;t ever get a chance to change it at all.Do WE as a Nation want to keep TALKING until we become a bigger version of GAZA?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You actually think the Govenment is going to Impeach ITSELF?Or Purge their own evil asses from the Thrones of Power you gave them? You give some teenager a gun and find out he has violent tendencies.You really think &#8220;ASKING&#8221; will get that gun back? The difference here is that by the time people get off their asses and FORCIBLY change  things these fuckers will have used Your money to build a Deathstar and you won&#8217;t ever get a chance to change it at all.Do WE as a Nation want to keep TALKING until we become a bigger version of GAZA?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
