 |
|
|
|||
 |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
 |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Obama and our Eugenical Future
- Text size
Paul & Phillip D. Collins
Conspiracy Archive
January 14, 2009
Obama and the Resurrection of the UNFPA
During his November 4, 2008 presidential acceptance speech, Barack Obama declared: “[C]hange has come to America.” Yet, Obama neglected to mention that not all of the changes in store for America, or the world in general, are positive. One of the more sinister changes the Obama Administration intends to introduce is a revival of eugenical regimentation.
|
|
 |
|
| When Obama financially reinvigorates the UNFPA, the floodgates of demographic catastrophe will be opened wide. | |
In a 2007 questionnaire prepared by RH Reality Check, a pro-abortion organization, the Obama Campaign stated: “Senator Obama would overturn the global gag rule and reinstate funding for UNFPA” (Lynch, "Sen. Barack Obama’s RH Issues Questionnaire"). Representative Carolyn Maloney would later express her confidence in the Obama promise to fund the UNFPA during a press conference at the National Press Club (Starr, "Congresswoman Confident Obama Will Fund UNFPA, Which Supports China’s Coercive Abortion Program"). The conference, which highlighted the release of the 2008 UN report on the state of the world’s population, gave Maloney an opportunity to take the podium and declare that the Obama Administration would reinstate funding for the UNFPA (ibid).
China
The crimes and faults of the Bush regime are almost too many to count. That being said, the Bush Administration’s restriction of UNFPA funding was well-justified. When one looks at the UNFPA’s track record, it could be argued that drying up the UNFPA’s money well was one of those rare moments of clarity that have appeared on the radar over the last eight years. The decision was motivated by a report prepared by the Population Research Institute (PRI) entitled “UNFPA, China, and Coercive Family Planning” (Ertelt, "Group Confirms Obama Would Fund Forced Abortions if UNFPA Money Restored"). According to LifeNews.com editor Steven Ertelt, the report “is based on an investigation conducted by PRI researchers in China’s Sihui County” (ibid). While many in the liberal camp want to believe that the report was a concocted fantasy, nothing could be further from the truth. Ertelt elaborates:
Relying on interviews with over two dozen victims and witnesses, the 2001 investigation found that coercive abortion and sterilization practices were taking place where the UNFPA had supposedly instituted a “client-centered and voluntary family planning program.” In fact, PRI’s investigation discovered that the UNFPA shared an office with the very Chinese family planning officials who were carrying out forced abortions. (ibid)
The investigation’s findings were so egregious that they motivated Colin Powell, who was Bush’s Secretary of State at the time, to conduct his own investigation (ibid). Powell’s research team confirmed PRI’s findings and Powell recommended that the Bush Administration revoke UNFPA funding (ibid). It is ironic that such a prescription would come from a man who would go on to cast his lot in with the Obama camp. Apparently, the revelations were too damning for even Powell to ignore.
Albania
China was not the only target of the UNFPA’s eugenics efforts. In 1999, the UNFPA sent 350,000 “Emergency Reproduction Health Kits” to Albania (Makimaa, 35). Joseph Meaney, a representative of Human Life International, had an opportunity to inspect the UNFPA’s kits. Meaney found these “health” packages to be filled with condoms, birth control pills, “morning after” pills, intrauterine devices, and manual vacuum aspirators used in early term abortions (35). According to a 1995 UN document discussing “refugee situations,” the packages were originally labeled “Pregnancy Termination” kits (35). The UN document further stated that the euphemistic labels were necessary to “reduce the risk of offending sensitivities” (35). But all the spin and euphemisms in the world could not conceal the UNFPA’s eugenics agenda. An office of Marie Stopes International, an organization dedicated to birth control, was even established in Pristina with the assistance of the UNFPA (35)
Doctor Enzo Ferrara, a physician employed at a hospital in Scutari, Albania during the UNFPA’s eugenical crusade, was outraged by the secret sterilization campaign being carried out against Albanians with the aid of the UN Her protests were met with a shocking response from Albania’s Ministry of Health: “We have accepted international aid on condition of reducing births” (35).
Why would the UN desire to reduce births in places like Albania and China? During the eighties, a criminal named Willie Horton became famous when he stated: “I rob banks because that’s where the money is.” The same principle applies here. The power elite standing behind the UN and its appendages such as the UNFPA have targeted places like Albania and China for eugenical regimentation because that is where they believe the “inferiors” reside.
The Eugenical Heritage of the UN
It should come as little surprise that the UN actively supports and finances eugenical practices. The organization’s eugenical heritage is made evident by the ideological pedigree of those who worked to form it. A majority of the framers of the UN Charter were members of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). Lawrence Shoup and William Minter document the role of the CFR in the UN’s inception:
The planning of the United Nations can be traced to the secret steering committee established by Secretary Hull January 1943. This informal Agenda Group, as it was later called, was composed of Hull, Davis, Taylor, Bowman, Pasvolsky, and until he left the government in August 1943, Welles. All of them, with the exception of Hull, were members of the Council on Foreign Relations. They saw Hull regularly to plan, select, and guide the labors of the Department’s Advisory Committee. It was, in effect, the coordinating agency for all the State Department postwar planning…
In late 1943, the Agenda Group began to draft the U.S. proposal for a United Nations organization to maintain international peace and security. The position eventually taken at the Dumbarton Oaks Conference was prepared during the seven-month period from December 1943 to July 1944. Once the group had produced a draft for the United Nations and Hull had approved it, the Secretary requested three distinguished lawyers to rule on its constitutionality. Myron C. Taylor, now on the Council’s board of directors, was Hull’s intermediary to Charles Evans Hughes, retired chief justice of the Supreme Court, John W. Davis, Democratic presidential candidate in 1924, and Nathan L. Miller, former Republican governor of New York. Hughes and Davis were both Council members and John W. Davis had served as president of the Council from 1921 to 1933 and a director since 1921. The three approved the plan, and on 15 June 1944. Hull, Stettinius, Davis, Bowman, and Pasvolsky discussed the draft with President Roosevelt. The chief executive gave his consent and issued a statement to the American people that afternoon.
Although the Charter of the United Nations underwent some modification in negotiations with other nations at the Dumbarton Oaks and San Francisco conferences during 1944 and 1945, one historian concluded that “the substance of the provisions finally written into the Charter in many cases reflected conclusions reached at much earlier stages by the United States government.” The Department of State was clearly in charge of these propositions within the U.S. government, and the role of the Council on Foreign Relations within the Department of State was, in turn, very great indeed. The Council’s power was unrivaled. (149-50)
The CFR’s involvement in the formation of the UN ensured the international entity’s usefulness as a conduit for elitist interests. The CFR was merely a stateside branch of the Royal Institute for International Affairs (RIIA) (Quigley 132-33). In turn, the RIIA was founded by the Round Table Groups (132-33). These Round Table Groups owed their existence to a directive presented in the last will and testament of genocidal British imperialist Cecil Rhodes. This directive mandated the formation of a secret network committed to the imperialist objectives of the British Empire. Rhodes’ Weltanschauung was inspired by a speech delivered by John Ruskin at Oxford in 1870. Carroll Quigley synopsizes Ruskin’s message:
Ruskin spoke to the Oxford undergraduates as members of the privileged ruling class. He told them that they were possessors of a magnificent tradition of education, beauty, rule of law, freedom, decency, and self-discipline, but that this tradition could not be saved, and did not deserve to be saved, unless it could be extended to the lower classes in England itself and to the non-English masses throughout the world. If this precious tradition were not extended to these two great majorities, the minority of upper class Englishmen would ultimately be submerged by these majorities and the tradition lost. To prevent this, the tradition must be extended to the masses and to the empire. (130)
Two characteristically oligarchic themes can be identified within Ruskin’s speech. First, Ruskin’s contention that the British ruling class possessed a “magnificent tradition of education, beauty, rule of law, freedom, decency, and self-discipline” echoes the eugenical contention that there is a superior stock of man culturally and genetically preordained to dominate the mass of brutes. Second, Ruskin’s contention that the lower class and non-English majorities could demographically overwhelm the upper class minority reiterates the oligarchic preoccupation with fertility differential. Historically, the ruling elite have consistently struggled with demographic disparities. Simply stated, they have always been outnumbered. Needless to say, greater numbers of people are more difficult to control.
This disproportion was made evident by a study conducted by the Royal Commission on Population in 1944. Formed by King George VI to examine the declining fertility rates in the British Commonwealth, the Commission observed that the demographic implosion advanced “fastest among the higher occupational categories” (qutd. in Jones 536). Apparently, a distinct fertility differential was making itself evident along socioeconomic demarcations. According to the Commission’s official report, it was the aristocracy that was demographically receding:
“Of the social groups, those with the highest incomes, and among individual parents within each social group, the better educated and the more intelligent, have smaller families on the average than others. We are not in a position to evaluate the expert evidence submitted to us to the effect that there is inherent in this differential birth rate a tendency towards lowering the average level of intelligence of the nation, but there is here an issue of the first important which needs to be thoroughly studied.” (Qutd. in Jones 536)
This fertility differential was attributable to the oligarchs’ tradition of “deliberate family limitation” (qutd. in Jones 535). Historically, the ruling class has maintained insular bloodlines through detestable practices, including inbreeding. The demographic costs of such practices were becoming evident. Not surprisingly, Malthusianism and its theoretical correlative, Darwinism, were promoted by scientific minds within elite quarters. The paradigms of Malthusianism and Darwinism were formulated according to the sociological considerations of the ruling elite. Out of these two “scientific” theories would emerge the socially and politically expedient concept of eugenical population control.
It is with fertility differential that one identifies the true rationale underpinning population control. E. Michael summarizes this rationale:
The ideology of population control is, simply a combination of fact #1: people produce economic wealth and military power, and fact #2: the affluent have smaller families. The English upper classes converted to Darwinism at the same time that they stopped having large families. As a result, they began to be concerned about something they referred to as “differential fertility,” which meant that while the “best people” (i.e., people of class) limited the size of their families, the rest of the world, especially the pullulating races of the Southern Hemisphere, did not. As good Darwinians they realized that the population with the higher fertility rate would eventually replace the population with lower fertility rate. Out of that fearful realization the idea of population control was born. (536)
- A d v e r t i s e m e n t
Simply stated, population control is camouflaged class warfare. In truth, the oligarchs are not concerned with carrying capacity. Ultimately, they are concerned with the capacity of their control. Recognizing the demographic disparities between the British ruling class and the commoners, Ruskin admonished Oxford audiences to extend the oligarhical tradition to the “lower classes in England itself and to the non-English masses throughout the world.” It was this imperialistic message that would inspire Rhodes’ campaign of colonial warfare in Africa and the later formation of the Round Table Groups. The continuity of this message was preserved through the RIIA and the CFR. With the CFR’s creation of the UN, the agendas of eugenical regimentation and population control found a channel for global implementation. Claire Chambers summarizes: “Since its inception, the U.N. has advanced a world-wide program of population control, scientific human breeding, and Darwinism” (3)
Demographic Bloodletting: The Hemorrhage of World Population
It’s not hard to detect that sinking feeling in the pit of your stomach when you realize that the Rubicon no longer lies ahead, but is trailing off into the distance behind you. Perceptive observers of the political and social landscape experienced just such a feeling when they learned of Obama’s intentions to revitalize the UNFPA. The cases of China and Albania painfully illustrate that such a move is tantamount to funding forced abortions, stealth sterilizations, and anti-natal campaigns. Obama could not select a worst time in human history to restore eugenical practices. Underneath the multitude of neo-Malthusian voices warning of the dire consequences attached to unchecked population growth, there is the hissing sound of demographic deflation.
One of the first indications that the people bomb was fizzling out came in a 2001 article in Nature Magazine entitled “The end of population growth.” In the article, the authors concluded that there is “around an 85% chance that the world’s population will stop growing before the end of the century” (Lutz, Sanderson, and Scherbov). Furthermore, the authors predicted that the coming population decline “will pose major social and economic challenges” (ibid).
By 2004, the negative impact of the population implosion upon global economic, political, and social stability could no longer be ignored by national governments. David Frances describes the situation:
For decades, much has been written about the world’s exploding population. But 60 countries, about a third of all nations, have fertility rates today below 2.1 children per woman, the number necessary to maintain a stable population. Half of those nations have levels of 1.5 of less. In Armenia, Italy, South Korea, and Japan, average fertility levels are now close to one child per woman.
Barring unforeseen change, at least 43 of these nations will have smaller populations in 2050 than they do today. (“Now, dangers of a population implosion”)
Anxious governments, once eagerly involved in depopulation campaigns, were now desperately switching course and implementing measures that encouraged procreation. Francis listed some of those measures:
Starting this year, France’s government has been awarding mothers of each new baby 800 euros, almost $1,000. In Italy, the government is giving mothers of a second child 1,000 euros.
South Korea has expanded tax breaks for families with young children and is increasing support for day-care centers for working women. Last year parliament members in Singapore called on the government to do more to keep Cupid and the stork busy.
Japanese prefectures have been organizing hiking trips and cruises for single people – dating programs to halt the bust. (ibid)
All of these pro-natal measures were meant to prevent the baby dearth from having a serious affect on nations’ economic vitality, pension programs, and healthcare (ibid). Unfortunately, years of depopulation campaigns and eugenical regimentation carried out under the guise of “reproductive rights” have made some of the consequences unavoidable.
In the United States, the effects are already being felt with the “graying” of society. During an interview with one of the authors of this article, Judith Baker, an executive director with the Association of Lutheran Older Adults, stated that, for the first time in history, older adults outnumber teenagers (ibid). By 2011, there will be around 11,000 baby boomers turning 65 every day (ibid). Will these people be able to retire? Looting has left Social Security and pension programs insolvent, so it is highly unlikely that boomers will be leaving the work force any time soon. A decent amount of replacement births could have generated a labor force that could replenish the Social Security fund and pension programs. But, abortion and other eugenical practices have contributed to dismal replacement levels, so retirement may disappear entirely.
Working later in life will prove to be a challenge for many. According to Baker, 20% of people have to deal with an Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL) limitation by age 75 (Baker). By age 85, one out of 3 men and 1 out of 2 women have one or more IADL limitations (ibid). For the older workers, these IADL limitations will instantly preclude several jobs that call for a lot of physical activity. This sad trend shows no sign of abating. In the next 20 years, there will be a 74 % increase in people over 50 and only a 1% increase in people under 50 (ibid).
When Obama financially reinvigorates the UNFPA, the floodgates of demographic catastrophe will be opened wide. With the UNFPA once again leading the power elite’s depopulation campaign, no amount of pro-natal measures will be effective in preventing serious complications stemming from the population implosion.
Sources Cited
Baker, Judith. Telephone Interview. 27 October 2008
Chambers, Claire. The SIECUS Circle: A Humanist Revolution. Appleton, Wisconsin: Western Islands, 1977
Ertelt, Steven. "Group Confirms Obama Would Fund Forced Abortions if UNFPA Money Restored," LifeNews.com 12 November 2008
Francis, David R. “Now, dangers of a population implosion.” Christian Science Monitor 7 October 2004
Jones, E. Michael. Libido Dominandi: Sexual Liberation and Political Control. South Bend,Indiana: St. Augustine’s Press, 2000.
Lutz, Wolfgang and Warren Sanderson and Sergei Scherbov. "The end of population growth." Nature.com 2 August 2001
Lynch, Andrea. "Sen. Barack Obama’s RH Issues Questionnaire." RH Reality Check 21 December 2007
Makimaa, Julie. "Wolf in ‘Humanitarian’ Clothing," New American 3 July 2000: 35-37.
Quigley, Carroll. Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in our Time. New York: Macmillan, 1966.
Shoup, Lawrence H. and William Minter. "Shaping a New World Order: The Council on Foreign Relations’ Blueprint for World Hegemony." Trilateralism: The Trilateral Commission and Elite Planning for World Management, Holly Sklar, ed., Boston: South End Press, 1980, 135-56.
Starr, Penny. "Congresswoman Confident Obama Will Fund UNFPA, Which Supports China’s Coercive Abortion Program," CNSNews.com 13 November 2008
-
- Social bookmarks
- Email this article
-
- Print this page
- Share on Twitter
January 14th, 2009 at 6:00 pm
“[C]hange has come to America.” Reminds me of Warcraft 3 the scene where the demon comes to earth.
January 14th, 2009 at 6:11 pm
The sheeple love being lied too, they can’t handle the truth
America is going to get ‘it’ good with Obama
January 14th, 2009 at 6:12 pm
ElectSake.com Don’t be caught unaware! Be informed! Be prepared! Visit “Revelation Now” at http://www.electsake.com to see where all this is leading.
January 14th, 2009 at 6:17 pm
OBAMA IS THE ANTI-CHRIST! WAIT AND SEE!!
January 14th, 2009 at 6:18 pm
There goes Albania again !!! ( There is some kind of fixation on Albania , in flicks , in the MSM
etc… ) WTF ?!?
January 14th, 2009 at 6:20 pm
The democratic party is and always has been THE PARTY OF DEATH!=============John3:36
January 14th, 2009 at 6:31 pm
Unfortunately, Earth population grow 70 million each year, size as France.
Population replacement happens at 2.1 babies born per women. Many countries in Asia , Africa and Latin america experience 3-6 births per women. If we have large number of young males, it means WAR. So , achieving repacement rate is very important goal. So Obama is right!
We have been waiting for it for long 8 years, when Bush killed efforts to do family planning.
Yes, voluntary abortions and sterilizations must be legal and widely available.
It is not the case for forcefull procedures
January 14th, 2009 at 6:39 pm
#6, BOTH PARTIES are evil! BOTH PARTIES are” in bed” with the evil elite that run this world! In the USA we claim to have a 2 party system,however we TRULY only have one party with 2 names (DEMS & REPUBS).They both have the same “end game” in mind & they are leading us down the path to destruction. The differences in the parties are in name only. To both, we the masses, are “USEFUL IDIOTS” to both we are merely pawns in their evil game!
January 14th, 2009 at 6:44 pm
I can’t wait much longer..death must be better than this…Lets leave the world to satan and his slaves.
I have always said all the the way through my life ” I wish I had never being born” Now its up to god to make me think otherwise! I don’t hold out much hope.
January 14th, 2009 at 6:47 pm
Why don’t you commit suicide NOW…Whats your dilema?Bully!
January 14th, 2009 at 6:48 pm
Since Obama’s mother was an ATHEIST and loved to hump muslim guys, I am suprised that she did not abort Obama before his birth! That would have solved all of us 4 years of hell! If Obama is for abortion, then why does he have such a big ego! His whore of a mother could have just as easily aborted him!
January 14th, 2009 at 7:01 pm
One day you will DIE yourSELF…just be carefull along the way…Dickhead! At the moment the world hates americans, Would forced abortion be justified (on americans)?Mickey mouse laa laa laa.See you in hell.,If you think sitting behind a computer spouting s**t is going to save you….well sorry dickhead your wrong.How much food have you got in your cupboard DICKHEAD?
January 14th, 2009 at 7:03 pm
You should have being aborted you FANNY RAG!
January 14th, 2009 at 7:04 pm
YIPPEE WE ALL GONNA DIE
January 14th, 2009 at 7:07 pm
Johnson PB, That was so deep, that clears everything up, your a genius! And if your whore of a mother aborted you, I would not have had to waste 10 seconds reading your useless post. Everyone’s a winner.
January 14th, 2009 at 7:10 pm
lehaim..why dont you help obama and commit suicide.. it is the least you can do, and would be beneficial to the entire planet.. oh, but its only ok to kill children when its NOT YOU!!! If I dont see your obituary in the paper tomorrow, I will know that you dont care about anyone but yourself. Maybe your mother should have killed YOU?? War comes from people who dont care about other people, and children..not from men. So, yes, your suicide would be beneficial to mankind. But you would just have others killed huh? so familiar. a true warmonger, and you are female. What a butt you made of yourself, and thanks for helping the cause of those who value life.
January 14th, 2009 at 7:13 pm
It’s not going to be me.
January 14th, 2009 at 7:18 pm
how come obama has kids of his own? will he be a grampa some day? oh that’s right, what’s good for the common man ain’t good for the elite.
January 14th, 2009 at 7:20 pm
JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS JESUS
GOLD GOLD GOLD GOLD GOLD GOLDGOLD GOLD GOLDGOLD GOLD GOLDGOLD GOLD GOLDGOLD GOLD GOLDGOLD GOLD GOLD
January 14th, 2009 at 7:22 pm
Regardless of all your hate messages.
By the way, hate messages on abortions usually come from males, not females.
Want to clarify for everybody: there is a number of males who strongly oppose family planning.
Why? It is the issue of control and male domination. Certain number of males want to control women ’s behavior. “Stay pregnant, and barefoot in the kitchen !” It is their slogan.
I would like to conduct the experiment.
Those of y ou, who posted hate response to my post, please, list the number of your children ( both in and out of wedlock) or adopted children that you tried to save personally from being aborted.
Then we will discuss.
To the audience: you will see very interesting results coming.
January 14th, 2009 at 7:50 pm
My message was not a hate message, just asking questions. But you ignored my message and focused on other messages that were a bit more, well, lets say, strong. AS far as I am concerned, (male here), my wife decided to take another path when my children were 2 and 4. Even during her drug abuse, she still wanted the kids. But, even tho my chances were zero on getting them, an even my lawyer told me that, I fought for my kids. I raised them by myself for over 12 years. My son is finishing his last year in college as a history major. Daughter is well also. It does not matter what you say, killing babies is not a good thing. Like I said in my previous post, if you have a problem with over-population, why not kill YOURSELF, rather than kills innocent children. Because you dont care about innocent children. You care about YOURSELF. And THAT is what causes wars, not male or female. Look thru history, women have also been extreme killers. It is not about gender, it is about attitude, an your attitude is to start war. You already admitted it by condoning the deaths of innocent children, while you hold on to life. Understand NOW? You started war, by killing innocent children. And they had no weapons to defend themselves..that is even worse.
January 14th, 2009 at 7:53 pm
I might add. Your comment: “you will see very interesting things coming” like you and the obama group are going to finally get what you want, no matter the outcome for others. sounds like a threat.
Threats, and killing babies. look in a mirror.
January 14th, 2009 at 7:56 pm
JESUS IS DEAD JESUS IS DEAD JESUS IS DEAD JESUS IS DEAD JESUS IS DEAD
January 14th, 2009 at 7:58 pm
we should make a huge hippie drum circle and hope for the best.
January 14th, 2009 at 8:03 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v.....re=related <<< The Pause That Refreshes!
January 14th, 2009 at 8:04 pm
More on Population.
In the beginning of 70s, population of China was about 500 million. The birth rate was 6 babies per women. They started controlling birth rate a little later, so by now it is 1.3 billion. If they did not start population control, it would be probably 3 billion or even more. The law is: if the birth rate is 6 babies per women, population doubles every 10-15 years.
Example:
Let us take imaginary city of 1 million.
1970 – 1 million
1980 – 2 million
1990 – 4 million
2000 – 8 million.
China stopped this madness. If you visit China , you will see nice cities and towns, people are nicely dressed. They are not starving. Plenty of food everywhere.
Same happened to Mexico. Mexico had coercive sterilization allowing 2 children only in the 80s.
I drove about 1000 miles in Mexico. It was amazing! Mexico city is beatiful, a lot of construction, very good roads, even in the mountains. New shopping malls, etc. I felt absolutely secure and people were very friendly.
We just have to admit: in order to eliminate poverty, we have no other choice but introduce voluntary family planning . Otherwise, it is imminent war, because people start competing for jobs, food, etc. It must be certain status quo.
It has nothing to do with “elite is trying to eliminate population”
January 14th, 2009 at 8:05 pm
#21 I agree 100%!!
“The fruits of abortions are Nuclear wars” -Mother Theresa
January 14th, 2009 at 8:23 pm
What’s wrong with maintaining equilibrium with some populations? Moreover, what’s wrong with reducing those that are clearly out-of-control, like China, India, America, Indonesia and Bangladesh, with one child per couple rule, followed by forced sterilization?
6.7 billion people is simply TOO MUCH. 2 billion or less is much much better. Ideally, one billion would be nice.
Nobody has to be killed, no baby aborted–ever!
The United States of America is about to hit the wall because no government official had the balls to introduce such legislation over 20 years ago when there was a chance to avoid disaster. So fine. Enjoy your lack of oil, food and water, especially when the US Dollar collapses and uncovers your moral and financial nakedness.
P.S. To all you Bible thumpers out there: many people in the good book had two or less children. It wasn’t the end of the World nor did it fizz God, so what’s the big deal?
P.P.S. I just can’t wait to see how Americans are going to import 13.5 million barrels of oil a day (65% of the country’s need) after the Dollar collapses. You deserve what’s coming to you. A nation of spoiled idiots. And make no mistake. God will NOT spare or save you this time! You will become the butt of jokes among the nations.
January 14th, 2009 at 8:29 pm
I WAS GOING TO COMMENT BUT EFF IT!!!
January 14th, 2009 at 8:40 pm
The World is f---ed Up Totaly!!!
Becose we let the Bankiers make, (Credits) & we have to pay them back in Money, But where is the Money, if the Banks only give Credits. so War against Civilians are in fullest way already.
Thanks.
January 14th, 2009 at 8:42 pm
i agree that there seriously needs to be some kind of population control. we value life way too much. and it’s going to cause things to get worse if we keep going like we are. we’re getting over populated. why is it that everytime someone tries to help make things better for the human race, they’re attacked by the idiots who believe we should just leave it alone and pray about things? f--- you guys!
January 14th, 2009 at 8:50 pm
Keep in mind that humans are the only species on this planet overrun other species of animals
January 14th, 2009 at 8:55 pm
@ nvr_mind…
sorry for the inconvenience, but please think a bit harder before you post.
1.: what does “we value life way too much” mean ??? (does that include you too?)
2.: who is “we” and who are “the idiots who believe we should just leave it alone” ?????
3.: please name 1 person who “made things better for the human race”.
4.: please name 1 person who attacked the person who made things better blabla…
anyways: cheers
January 14th, 2009 at 8:58 pm
28# ?? your attitude is precisely why judgement has come to the earth ,, because of your mentality!!!!
as far as Oobama,,, he has proven to me only one thing!! he is and anti-Christ!!!!!! I will not deny my faith in Christ !! all this legislation of infanticide and eugenics brings down Gods wrath,, YOU DONT PLAY GOD !! pure and simple,, you take Gods job away ,, then you try to make yourselves like unto Him who reigns forever and ever,, and that makes Him verry angry!!!
All the natural catastrophies,, the wars and the genocide in Gaza,,, and the multitude of other things happening all over the world,,,almost too many to count!!!!! no the world shall not be destroyed because it has supported life from conception to natural death,, but quite the contrary,, it shall bring destruction upon itself because of the cutlture of death that has infected most governments and peoples of the world!! those in high places that God has allowed in power for a given time ,, shall answer to a few questions at judgement ,,, did you kill innocent babies ?? did you poison the water?? did you destroy nations from within?? and from without? why did you formulate products that gave my people a slow and painful death…so called medications,,,food additives,,, genetically modified seeds and foods,, ,,it is written that ,, EVERYTHING THAT IS DONE IN DARKNESS ,, SHALL BE BROUGHT INTO THE LIGHT!! .,,,for God everyone to see!!!
and i dont mean your illuminated evil god, molech,,,, i am talking about God the father ,, God the Son,,, and God the Holy Ghost! amen,! Lord Jesus ,,send your angels to stop these evils of our day and save us ,, amen.
January 14th, 2009 at 8:59 pm
FCUK ALL ZIO-NEO-SCUM-BLOOD-SUCKERS & O”BAAA”MA BIN LADEN TOO !!!
* RON PAUL ….4…. PRESIDENT *
* ALEX JONES …4….VICE-PRESIDENT *
* ALAN WATT ……4… SECRETARY-OF-STATE *
* PETER SCHIFF…..4… TREASURY *
POWER 2 THE PEOPLE, BY THE PEOPLE, 4 THE PEOPLE ..=.. REVOLUTION TIME
INFO-WARRIORS ……………………………ENGAGE THE INFORMATION WAR !!!
January 14th, 2009 at 9:04 pm
#31 ,,,dont worry , they have population control waiting for the whole world in their evil scheme of things,,, did you ever think it might just include you ?? also?? you may say eff me now but you just might use the prayer option when you are looking out of a barbed wire fence in a fema camp waiting on your turn for your part in the eugenics,,NWO style!
January 14th, 2009 at 9:11 pm
Please, keep in mind that coercive or forceful sterilization is a CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY, as defined by Haague Tribunal.
However , it has nothing to do with Family planning programs as it exists in the Western Countries.
Nobody forces women to have abortions or sterilizations, in the same time information on birth control is widely available.
You may choose to have 0 or 15 children, nobody controls you, but nobody denies an abortion to a women, if she asks for it.
P.S. To those people who feel that abortion is not an option, you can join Pro life organizations that offer “adoption” to “abortion”. You may offer to adopt a baby, so a women does not need to go for an abortion.
January 14th, 2009 at 9:25 pm
To everyone in favor of population control:
START WITH YOURSELF!
January 14th, 2009 at 9:27 pm
33
Actualy that is not true. plenty of other animals kill their own species, for territory or mates ect.
Gorrilas for one, make war as a pack to drive away other ‘tribes’ from their territory.
January 14th, 2009 at 9:29 pm
@electropredator
hm… can’t really make out what you are saying… did you mean:
1. humans are the only species on this planet overrun BY other animals ?
or
2. humans are the only species who overran other species of animals ?
…doesn’t matter actually, because both points are epically wrong of course.
January 14th, 2009 at 9:39 pm
the best of the best, yes, maybe seems apperantly healthy attactive people, but beauty is in the eye of the beholder. i say the meak are beautiful, the best of the best are also modest and labeled meak. Inherite our earth, we shall.
January 14th, 2009 at 9:46 pm
#4 What is actualy the definition of the anti-christ? anti-messiah? Help me understand. Cause I don’t worship jc. Does that make me an anti-christ? And what about the people that worship other religions outside of christianity are they anti-christ? I mean ,I just want some clarity, thats all.
January 14th, 2009 at 9:47 pm
The money-men dont like to share. They kill us in may ways.
http://www4.dr-rath-foundation.....itical.htm
January 14th, 2009 at 9:56 pm
There are 6.74 billion people on the earth as of nov. 08. Texas has 268,820 square miles. That is 7494271488000 square feet. If ALL 6.74 billion people on the earth moved to Texas, every man, woman, and child would each have 1,111 square feet of personal space. There would be plenty of room left on the earth. You think the earth is over populated? WOW!
January 14th, 2009 at 10:10 pm
If all people of Earth 6.7 billion move into Texas, the population of Earth would immediately decreased to less than 2 billion, and even less because people will start killing each other for lack of resources. Uuups, just a new idea for a NWO.
It is pure speculation to even make such an assumption.
January 14th, 2009 at 11:00 pm
Let me rephrase. Mathematically speaking, the earth is NOT over populated by any stretch of the imagination. Historically speaking, Hitler was very supportive of eugenics. If further explination is required, read history book on the holocaust.
January 14th, 2009 at 11:15 pm
Lehiam 18, if you are referring to #45 being pure speculation you are indeed sorrily incorrect. It is based on science. If not, oh well, #45, I am glad you posted that info it is so true and many are too sheepified to beleive it…even on this board.
January 14th, 2009 at 11:23 pm
It is not Willie Horton who said, ” I rob banks because that is where the money is”. It was Willie Sutton a rather Dapper Bank Robber from the 1930’s. Willie Horton was used in an ad by George H.W. Bush, that showed a revolving door for violent felons. If you are going to quote folks at least take the .02 seconds it takes to do a Google search.
January 14th, 2009 at 11:33 pm
The earth is overpopulated idiots. The only reason there is 6+ billion people because we have stopped what naturally killed people for thousands of years .
I hate to say it but its not most of the world thats over populated but its india china and south east asia. Over the half of the worlds population is in 3 countries.
Africa is pretty bad not as high population density but the lack of resources. to suppor tpeople
January 15th, 2009 at 12:33 am
the more of “us” there are,the less “they”can control us
January 15th, 2009 at 12:45 am
it’s possible that we could get our acts together and provide at least basic needs for 99% of the world’s population but until we can do that, we should try to help keep population growth at bay
it’s irresponsible to create children when you can’t provide for them, however people living in poverty can’t seem to help themselves… I don’t think that they are being targeted for their ethnicity or skin color…
January 15th, 2009 at 12:47 am
Wow yeah, dumb Africans dont got nothing. Except oil, gold, diamonds, and land suitable for growing food. Unfortunately for them, God made a mistake and put all OUR resources on their land, so we’ve had to correct that over the past few centuries by kidnapping and enslaving and colonizing and killing and converting them. Tis such a burden to look out for these poor, helpless simpletons.
January 15th, 2009 at 12:48 am
On the idea of mathematically placing all people in Texas or any other place.
If you give a person 10 sq feet to live, you may not even need such big territory as Texas.
I think that Alabama will be enough. However, this situation does not fit into mathematics!
6.7 billion cannot safely live all in Alabama, or in Texas, or maybe on the entire North America. We have no enough resources for it, so people will start killing each other until the territory will be enough to feed them. When balance is established, war stops.
My point is that we should not go into the extreme and blindly oppose family planning efforts.
Unfortunately, there is no country in the world that would eliminate poverty and in the same time maintaned high birth rate ( 5- 6 babies per women). There is only exception with small Gulf countries that became very rich due to oil. But if you review their population dynamics, birth rate slowly decreases.
So, by NOT implementing reasonable family planning efforts, we provoke more wars for distribution of local resources. It has nothing to do with Nazis, World War II and Hitler.
We can only regulate births voluntarily or through the wars that are caused by struggle for local resources.
January 15th, 2009 at 1:00 am
#45 is silly. Many people have houses over 1000 square feet, now put them next to each other in texas and see how many are in streams lakes or precariously perched on cliffs. Now find a place for all the busy roads and highways. where will they all shop? work? farm? imagine the sewage system! holy crap! Where will they get their resources?
The truth about population growth is that it has both positive and negative effects. For humans the effects are difficult to determine because we can learn to use resources more efficiently or exploit new ones. Deer on the other hand don’t innovate much and predictions about their population’s effect in relation to available resources. Predictions, are fallible of course, external events and inaccurate data can easily create problems.
Simply out breeding another group is not enough to determine which one will survive or gain control. Consider the sheer numbers of sheep compared to shepherds and how many aren’t sterile.
I believe forced sterilization has been/is used (on native americans for instance) and that it is a horrific practice but this article is inaccurate and the author makes use of guilt by association and the reader’s ignorance to prove its point. It is amazing how much anti-science and ignorance I find on this site every day.
January 15th, 2009 at 1:18 am
This is a good look at the future.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rAqPMJFaEdY
Have a nice day.
January 15th, 2009 at 1:23 am
#54, how utterly selfish. It has nothing to do with resources, it has to do completely with GREED. There is PLENTY here, and if you can’t see that, then I feel sorry for you. I am having my number five child, and I don’t feel a bit guilty about it. We need not greedy people in this world, and if we continue to depopulate that section of the people, there’s just more room for the greedy to take over. Get over yourself. There is PLENTY to feed every person in this world sufficiently, it’s GREED that stops that from happening.
January 15th, 2009 at 1:35 am
Those who voted for change will get exactly what they asked for. The anti-christ aka satan will be coming in the near future to run The One World Govt. Show and also claim to be God. Christ Jesus will return thereafter to judge humanity, don’t be deceievd by satan.
January 15th, 2009 at 1:43 am
TO 53: Africans are indeed great people with amazing local traditions. If you meet people from Africa you will be amazed about their intelligence and grace.
However, they cannot avoid westernization and accept lower birth rate in order to have kids educated. You can see very clear pattern. For example, in Kenya, more educated urban people have 2-3 kids, less educated rural people have higher birth rate. Many rural women are abandoned by their husbands with 5-6 kids and barely survive. So, we return back to clear correlation between poverty and number of kids.
I just try to illustrate my view with the examples from real life, so people do not blindly deny women birth control on the ground of “baby killing” and consider any efforts in family planning being vicious conspiracy to eliminate all Africa or any other country.
January 15th, 2009 at 2:00 am
To parentsfortruth:
God bless you for having 5 kids! I used to live in the area where family had 6-7 kids, and it was great!
Please, do not take this conversation as a personal offense. As long as you feel good about having large family, you will succeed !
Many women in poor countries do not want to have 5 kids, they want 1 or 2 because they cannot feed and educate more kids , but they are denied or cannot afford birth control.
Nobody denies that there were forceful sterilization programs run by the UN using US money.
If any organization does it , it is considered to be CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY and they can be charged for it.
January 15th, 2009 at 3:56 am
This comes as no surprise to me whatsoever. I’m from England and for the past few months we over here have been bombarded by the media with stories about child abuse. There has been a case about a baby they named ‘Baby P’ who was terribly abused by his young mother, her boyfriend and a tenant at the house where they lived. It was a disgusting story. Since then there seems to be cases being raised in the media every week and are usually the top news story. I began to wonder to myself, why? This kind of thing has happened for years. There are far worse cases that go on. Why hit us with all this (graphic) news about child abuse now?
A couple of weeks back I was watching a talk show and a minister from Holland was on and talking about how over there they are bringing in a law where certain people whom are deemed by the law incapable or unfit to have children are forcefully (although that was not the term used) given contraception. Basically, every womans right to have a child is taken away. The state now decides this. The show was about eugenics and I immediately realised what was going on and what was going to happen here in the UK. Clearly, this is something that will be brought in and the state are using the media to broadcast terrible stories of child abuse so we all go “How terrible! These people should not be allowed to have children!”.
I truly fear for out liberties. This state control has to stop and it has to stop now. People need to wake up to it.
January 15th, 2009 at 4:09 am
It is simple. Abort non moslims, birth moslims and you have a happy muslame world
January 15th, 2009 at 5:59 am
islam was created by the catholic church…
disagree, ok , that is fine… type it into google and get informed….
most religion are weapons created for division….
be safe and God bless
‘church is when God has left the building’ – bono
January 15th, 2009 at 6:29 am
lehaim–My grandsons mother told him that she would have aborted him if his dad had not wanted him. He is now 13, a very good boy who believes in God, and has an IQ of 149, What would the world have missed if she had aborted him? Not to mention the joy he brings to so many lives, including mine.
January 15th, 2009 at 7:16 am
This reminds me of Spiral Dynamics, which scares the Hell out of me. I read about it several years ago and a search would only turn up one or two links. Now there are tons of them and youtube videos too. They categorize society into groups and what will stop our government from deciding that one of these groups are dispensable and go around and round up these people after they have been identified through gleaned information from several sources including the internet social sites. I can’t understand why there aren’t any sites that are against this kind of thinkiing. This stuff is being introduced to kids in college as if it is a great idea….anyway I am concerned.
January 15th, 2009 at 7:28 am
I cant believe they now saying who can and can not have children,the elites plans for a NWO are all coming together.
January 15th, 2009 at 7:37 am
i hope they re-distribute the norplant, wipe the ghetto clean. Seriously, i remember the norplant, spearheaded by the population council (rockerfeller foundation i beleive?) it was a tiny implant that kept women sterile for 5 years, and to their surprise 5 years later, permanently sterile. eugenics is a dirty side of our history thats all too real. Third trimester abortions for the retarded are another one. But also, this country is ovpopulated, as messed up and controversial as this is gonna sound, i hope the program is implemented full force along with the legalization of abortion. Inner citys in the midwest are being run down by the lack of child services, child services that wouldnt even be used if abortion was around. Look at all the criminals in the ghetto, trailer parks , outskirts and downtowns , im sure at least 1 of their parents wanted an abortion. Or not . who knows . Abortion, adding some eugenics to stop alot of disabled people from being born will save us so much in taxes. See it from my view, i saw someone collecting welfare, on section 8, disabled because of their obesity, her 18 year old son is autistic. He collects disability. They both get medicaid. And bus passes, and a family first card for food, and it has 100$ in cash benefits aside from everything. WTF. free housing,food,insurance,transportation. for what? because hes poisoned from vaccines? give me a f---ing break. Once we stop this gravy train we’ll get this country on track
January 15th, 2009 at 7:41 am
Chinas had a huge population crisis for a long time now, but they go about dealing with it in such a barbaric and illogical way. What in the hell is keeping them from using BIRTH CONTROL! f---ing idiots.
and #63, newsflash, there is no such thing as a happy muslim world. Your capital punishment loving, woman beating, oppressive religion has no place in modern times. Get your mind out of the stone age.
January 15th, 2009 at 7:53 am
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yAvKDuYh_wQ
January 15th, 2009 at 8:03 am
lehaim18 Says:
January 15th, 2009 at 1:43 am
TO 53: Africans are indeed great people with amazing local traditions. If you meet people from Africa you will be amazed about their intelligence and grace.
Ahhh, yes. I am always amazed by the grace and intelligence of dumbasses that kill farmers and take their land and then cry to the UN about not having enough food to eat.
I am especially amazed by the grace and intelligence of the lowlifes that teach that the way to cure aids is to rape a white virign.
But mostly, I’m amazed and awed by the grace and intelligence of a bunch of knuckle dragging jackasses that slaughter each other with machetes in Rwanda.
Thank God we can hope that Obama’s family has experienced enough grae and amazement, to change this cycle and that he doesn’t want to kill you all with a machete. Or rape you or steel your food and land… wait… on the other hand…RUNRUUUUUUNNNN ahhhahhHHHHHHhhh where is my aluminum hat!!???? AAAHh hhhahhHHHHAHHhhhhh
>idiots<
Stop watching Fox. This all sounds like something you’d hear on Fox. Don’t be a bunch of tools.
Chris.
January 15th, 2009 at 8:28 am
OBAMA’S FAMILY OWNED SLAVES YOU IDIOT, DO THE RESEARCH
January 15th, 2009 at 8:52 am
This world belongs to the lord of the flies…it shows…
January 15th, 2009 at 9:43 am
Africa is a s--- hole. Its amazing how quick people are too ignore the black on white gang rape, child rape, baby rape, horrible torture all throughout South Africa. I hope you idiots are starting to see why whites didn’t want to live with the blacks you dumbass’s. Sometimes ‘racism’ saves lives (apartheid)
January 15th, 2009 at 9:58 am
Africa wasn’t so bad 60 years ago. But the end of Colonization and the begin of self rule has pushed it to the s---ter. Now it is nothing but gang (tribal) violence. Everyone is starving and the world keeps giving billions of dollars to every new leader. No wonder there is such a fight to be in charge. 20 presidential palaces and your people starve. This is where the big rappers get the genes to wear so much gold and drive there funny wheeled caddys while their friends and neighbors starve.
January 15th, 2009 at 10:32 am
The USA is overpopulated because of third world immigration, period. The Americans who have been here since dot are not having kids. Of all the white and black women I know, fully 80% don’t have one kid. Only a handful are married. Then I get in the truck and travel to the local barrio…..there’s your kids, people. There’s your overpopulation, people. There’s your “We’ll breed you out” mentality, people. So don’t come here with “America’s overpopulated and so we need to serilize all American women.” Ballocks!
January 15th, 2009 at 10:43 am
intelligencereport.tk
be ready!!!!
“semi ato bann with in 90 days” – Obama
January 15th, 2009 at 10:51 am
http://www.realmilk.com to have a local creamery deliver fresh raw organic milk cream and butter
its our right to have this
January 15th, 2009 at 10:57 am
Eugenics used to play a huge role in social engineering which actually created strong societies of homogenous people that accomplished great things. Now 3rd world populations are breeding like rabbits and have become totally dependant on world government handouts. They are conditioned to be hostile towards peoples of European decent and feel violence towards whites is not only justified but a celebrated act of rebellion. Things are going to get worse very soon unless dramatic changes are made in our domestic policies.
January 15th, 2009 at 10:58 am
OBAMA THE CRACK SMOKING BISEXUAL MIND CONTROL SLAVE WILL DO WHATEVER IS ASKED OF HIM. HIS PROGRAMMER WOULD NOT HAVE IT ANY OTHER WAY. OBAMA DOES NOT CONTROL OUR DESTINY, THE PUPPET MASTERS DO. BUT IN THE NEXT 5 YEARS SOMETHING WILL GIVE AND MOST OF THEM WILL BE DEAD. READ MOTHER SHIPTONS PROPHECIES. GOD WILL BE THE CHIEF EUGENISIST-THE FILTH WILL BE SWEPT FROM THE EARTH.
PLANET X 2012 THE AWSOME DAY OF THE LORD
January 15th, 2009 at 11:06 am
listen people the cold hard fact is that if we want to come to peacefull economic and political standings as a global community eugenics is something we will be teaching and practicing. some would say hell no, and in the situation as in this article its wrong and i say hell no also. but there is one important statement being made about the education factor. and simply stated that intelligent people dont breed as much do to the simple factor of histories education of global socioeconomic and political impacts. i guess what im saying is that when your educated you realize that the system of the earth not just man cant handle us free will breeding like f---in rabbits. and i also hate to say that in some ways the more we become advanced in dna genectic stem cells that some people will be deamed unable to breed, due to the factors of burden to the system to take care of these or cure them. but true cure would void everything i just said. advancement of education though is the only thing that could lead us to these cures if possible. also i dont think that we should get rid of the genectically defective, but if you have some genectic abnormality that is hereditary and is uncurable you should not be able to pass that abnormality on. s--- people animals do this naturally and so do we when we put into natural circumstances. education makes us realize that we are the animal elite on this planet but were still f---in animals. and until we take that to heart and take away that dividing line we gonna be in the same type of s--- were in right now.
January 15th, 2009 at 11:14 am
Can’t we all just get along.
January 15th, 2009 at 11:15 am
These message boards are becoming filled with racist banter. It doesn’t do anything but provide a scapegoat for real issues. It’s easy to blame others. I can’t even get an intelligent comment to read anymore.
January 15th, 2009 at 11:49 am
Democrats and Republicans are just names they use to keep the people divided. They all feed
from the same trough. Divide and conquer.
January 15th, 2009 at 11:54 am
If like me, you’ve probably been wondering why there are so many idiots running around with very little cognitive ability, willing to accept whatever is dished out to them, and who by all rights should know better.
Perhaps diet is playing a major role in this behavior.
Read the following regarding “Zombie Food”,
“Wheat- and dairy products contain opioid peptides influencing endorphin receptors in the brain. These peptides are physically addictive, causing dependence, asthma, obesity, apathy, ignorance and numbness. The same goes for beta-carbolines from prepared food.
To be sharp and investigative, you ought to consume neither dairy- nor wheat-products. You don’t need those ‘foods’ at all.”
I have stumbled upon this information on a web site that could put light on a significant part of our collective problem, namely that we are being fed the food of cult members, and are thus behaving like cult members. This web site is selling nothing by the way, check it here;
http://www.youngerthanyourage.com/13/zombie.htm
The ability to overcome obstacles must begin with a clear, sharp mind. Short of this our efforts are energy more than likely wasted.
January 15th, 2009 at 11:57 am
“Now, dangers of a population implosion”
You are joking right? I live in China, I’m not Chinese, and believe me, population control and family planning is a blessing for this world.
Are you advocating that the human race cancer spreads out uncontrolled and wipes us all from the planet on the short run?
This is the most retarded article Ive read here. Sorry to say it.
January 15th, 2009 at 12:13 pm
***JUDGMENT is on America and the rest of the world. REPENT while you still have time.John3:36
January 15th, 2009 at 12:27 pm
I believe that eugenics would be used as a means of political punishment or reward.
Did anyone else notice that two of the deciding factors for them were family income and education? Both of these are doled out preferentially.
January 15th, 2009 at 12:32 pm
&&& HERE COMES the ‘draft’ for all you wonderful ‘Godless’ liberals… FRONT page of DRUDGE by demoncratic leaders… READ it and weap you pagans!
January 15th, 2009 at 1:34 pm
If You Want The Truth Please Subscribe Guys!
I don’t hold anything back, Wake Up Sheep!!!!
http://www.youtube.com/sd9883
January 15th, 2009 at 4:04 pm
Hey JoeMaker34, nice YouTube channel, my brother. Keep up the great work. I hope everyone goes over there and checks it out.
January 15th, 2009 at 4:41 pm
Hitler, Mussolini, Obama!
January 15th, 2009 at 8:24 pm
“4w578i Says:
January 15th, 2009 at 12:27 pm
I believe that eugenics would be used as a means of political punishment or reward.
Did anyone else notice that two of the deciding factors for them were family income and education? Both of these are doled out preferentially.”
I would say family income is a function of education.. and that is indeed kept out of the reach of the “inferior”. Not that the “education” given to the “preferred” is in any way empowering across domain boundaries and allows the ‘educated’ to appreciate the big picture in larger contexts, instead it is tightly focused on whatever tasks are required. The comprehensive type of education is reserved for the elites themselves. Also education serves as a filter keeping talented and gifted individuals from pursuing a field where they might have access to means and ends to upset the status quo.
But that point is moot now as they are now having another go at producing the perfect slave. The New Man will be stunted by genetics, bred for meekness, implanted for complete control and socialized and drugged to love his lot. On top of that they will have a low life expectancy of less than 30 years. They will be like young children, utterly dependent on their controllers while bright enough to accomplish complex tasks but emotionally and mentally stunted at the same time to take the initiative or devise and carry out long-term personal plans. At the same they will be very very closely monitored and those not conforming to an exacting standard of expected behavior will be liquidated along with their possible offspring.
If any of you elites are reading here, I would really be obliged if you could answer me this burning question I really haven’t figured out yet: What will you be left with once you have achieved this end goal? Where is the pleasure in torturing a defenseless animal that will kneel to the abuse, when the real pleasure lies in forcing and breaking a man’s will? Isn’t the pain _beautiful_ in a young woman’s eyes as she is made to watch the death of her child? But what substitute is it to take away offspring from an animal that will have already forgotten the pain only a few months later? Once you have achieved total domination, doesn’t that leave you sucking on the candy wrapper long after you’ve eaten the chocolates? What will you do?
January 15th, 2009 at 9:35 pm
#99 CB I couldn’t have said it better myself!
January 16th, 2009 at 10:58 am
europe, it’s happened to me too. i can’t scroll through the pictured articles, there’s like a minute delay for every one. i’m pretty sure it’s just traffic. try it at 3am.