 |
|
|
|||
 |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
 |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Obama Science Advisor Called For “Planetary Regime” To Enforce Totalitarian Population Control Measures
- Text size
President Obama’s top science and technology advisor John P. Holdren co-authored a 1977 book in which he advocated the formation of a “planetary regime” that would use a “global police force” to enforce totalitarian measures of population control, including forced abortions, mass sterilization programs conducted via the food and water supply, as well as mandatory bodily implants that would prevent couples from having children.
The concepts outlined in Holdren’s 1977 book Ecoscience, which he co-authored with close colleagues Paul Ehrlich and Anne Ehrlich, were so shocking that a February 2009 Front Page Magazine story on the subject was largely dismissed as being outlandish because people couldn’t bring themselves to believe that it could be true.
It was only when another Internet blog obtained the book and posted screenshots that the awful truth about what Holdren had actually committed to paper actually began to sink in.
This issue is more prescient than ever because Holdren and his colleagues are now at the forefront of efforts to combat “climate change” through similarly insane programs focused around geoengineering the planet. As we reported in April, Holdren recently advocated “Large-scale geoengineering projects designed to cool the Earth,” such as “shooting pollution particles into the upper atmosphere to reflect the sun’s rays,” which many have pointed out is already occurring via chemtrails.
Ecoscience discusses a number of ways in which the global population could be reduced to combat what the authors see as mankind’s greatest threat – overpopulation. In each case, the proposals are couched in sober academic rhetoric, but the horrifying foundation of what Holdren and his co-authors are advocating is clear. These proposals include;
- Forcibly and unknowingly sterilizing the entire population by adding infertility drugs to the nation’s water and food supply.
- Legalizing “compulsory abortions,” ie forced abortions carried out against the will of the pregnant women, as is common place in Communist China where women who have already had one child and refuse to abort the second are kidnapped off the street by the authorities before a procedure is carried out to forcibly abort the baby.
- Babies who are born out of wedlock or to teenage mothers to be forcibly taken away from their mother by the government and put up for adoption. Another proposed measure would force single mothers to demonstrate to the government that they can care for the child, effectively introducing licensing to have children.
- Implementing a system of “involuntary birth control,” where both men and women would be mandated to have an infertility device implanted into their body at puberty and only have it removed temporarily if they received permission from the government to have a baby.
- Permanently sterilizing people who the authorities deem have already had too many children or who have contributed to “general social deterioration”.
- Formally passing a law that criminalizes having more than two children, similar to the one child policy in Communist China.
- This would all be overseen by a transnational and centralized “planetary regime” that would utilize a “global police force” to enforce the measures outlined above. The “planetary regime” would also have the power to determine population levels for every country in the world.
The quotes from the book are included below. We also include comments by the author of the blog who provided the screenshots of the relevant passages. Screenshots of the relevant pages and the quotes in their full context are provided at the end of the excerpts. The quotes from the book appear as text indents and in bold. The quotes from the author of the blog are italicized.
Page 837: Compulsory abortions would be legal
“Indeed, it has been concluded that compulsory population-control laws, even including laws requiring compulsory abortion, could be sustained under the existing Constitution if the population crisis became sufficiently severe to endanger the society.”
As noted in the FrontPage article cited above, Holdren “hides behind the passive voice” in this passage, by saying “it has been concluded.” Really? By whom? By the authors of the book, that’s whom. What Holdren’s really saying here is, “I have determined that there’s nothing unconstitutional about laws which would force women to abort their babies.” And as we will see later, although Holdren bemoans the fact that most people think there’s no need for such laws, he and his co-authors believe that the population crisis is so severe that the time has indeed come for “compulsory population-control laws.” In fact, they spend the entire book arguing that “the population crisis” has already become “sufficiently severe to endanger the society.”
Page 786: Single mothers should have their babies taken away by the government; or they could be forced to have abortions
“One way to carry out this disapproval might be to insist that all illegitimate babies be put up for adoption—especially those born to minors, who generally are not capable of caring properly for a child alone. If a single mother really wished to keep her baby, she might be obliged to go through adoption proceedings and demonstrate her ability to support and care for it. Adoption proceedings probably should remain more difficult for single people than for married couples, in recognition of the relative difficulty of raising children alone. It would even be possible to require pregnant single women to marry or have abortions, perhaps as an alternative to placement for adoption, depending on the society.”
Holdren and his co-authors once again speculate about unbelievably draconian solutions to what they feel is an overpopulation crisis. But what’s especially disturbing is not that Holdren has merely made these proposals — wrenching babies from their mothers’ arms and giving them away; compelling single mothers to prove in court that they would be good parents; and forcing women to have abortions, whether they wanted to or not — but that he does so in such a dispassionate, bureaucratic way. Don’t be fooled by the innocuous and “level-headed” tone he takes: the proposals are nightmarish, however euphemistically they are expressed.
Holdren seems to have no grasp of the emotional bond between mother and child, and the soul-crushing trauma many women have felt throughout history when their babies were taken away from them involuntarily.
This kind of clinical, almost robotic discussion of laws that would affect millions of people at the most personal possible level is deeply unsettling, and the kind of attitude that gives scientists a bad name. I’m reminded of the phrase “banality of evil.”
Not that it matters, but I myself am “pro-choice” — i.e. I think that abortion should not be illegal. But that doesn’t mean I’m pro-abortion — I don’t particularly like abortions, but I do believe women should be allowed the choice to have them. But John Holdren here proposes to take away that choice — to force women to have abortions. One doesn’t need to be a “pro-life” activist to see the horror of this proposal — people on all sides of the political spectrum should be outraged. My objection to forced abortion is not so much to protect the embryo, but rather to protect the mother from undergoing a medical procedure against her will. And not just any medical procedure, but one which she herself (regardless of my views) may find particularly immoral or traumatic.
There’s a bumper sticker that’s popular in liberal areas which says: “Against abortion? Then don’t have one.” Well, John Holdren wants to MAKE you have one, whether you’re against it or not.
Page 787-8: Mass sterilization of humans though drugs in the water supply is OK as long as it doesn’t harm livestock
“Adding a sterilant to drinking water or staple foods is a suggestion that seems to horrify people more than most proposals for involuntary fertility control. Indeed, this would pose some very difficult political, legal, and social questions, to say nothing of the technical problems. No such sterilant exists today, nor does one appear to be under development. To be acceptable, such a substance would have to meet some rather stiff requirements: it must be uniformly effective, despite widely varying doses received by individuals, and despite varying degrees of fertility and sensitivity among individuals; it must be free of dangerous or unpleasant side effects; and it must have no effect on members of the opposite sex, children, old people, pets, or livestock.”
OK, John, now you’re really starting to scare me. Putting sterilants in the water supply? While you correctly surmise that this suggestion “seems to horrify people more than most proposals,” you apparently are not among those people it horrifies. Because in your extensive list of problems with this possible scheme, there is no mention whatsoever of any ethical concerns or moral issues. In your view, the only impediment to involuntary mass sterilization of the population is that it ought to affect everyone equally and not have any unintended side effects or hurt animals. But hey, if we could sterilize all the humans safely without hurting the livestock, that’d be peachy! The fact that Holdren has no moral qualms about such a deeply invasive and unethical scheme (aside from the fact that it would be difficult to implement) is extremely unsettling and in a sane world all by itself would disqualify him from holding a position of power in the government.
Page 786-7: The government could control women’s reproduction by either sterilizing them or implanting mandatory long-term birth control
Involuntary fertility control
“A program of sterilizing women after their second or third child, despite the relatively greater difficulty of the operation than vasectomy, might be easier to implement than trying to sterilize men.
The development of a long-term sterilizing capsule that could be implanted under the skin and removed when pregnancy is desired opens additional possibilities for coercive fertility control. The capsule could be implanted at puberty and might be removable, with official permission, for a limited number of births.”
Note well the phrase “with official permission” in the above quote. John Holdren envisions a society in which the government implants a long-term sterilization capsule in all girls as soon as they reach puberty, who then must apply for official permission to temporarily remove the capsule and be allowed to get pregnant at some later date. Alternately, he wants a society that sterilizes all women once they have two children. Do you want to live in such a society? Because I sure as hell don’t.
Page 838: The kind of people who cause “social deterioration” can be compelled to not have children
“If some individuals contribute to general social deterioration by overproducing children, and if the need is compelling, they can be required by law to exercise reproductive responsibility—just as they can be required to exercise responsibility in their resource-consumption patterns—providing they are not denied equal protection.“
To me, this is in some ways the most horrifying sentence in the entire book — and it had a lot of competition. Because here Holdren reveals that moral judgments would be involved in determining who gets sterilized or is forced to abort their babies. Proper, decent people will be left alone — but those who “contribute to social deterioration” could be “forced to exercise reproductive responsibility” which could only mean one thing — compulsory abortion or involuntary sterilization. What other alternative would there be to “force” people to not have children? Will government monitors be stationed in irresponsible people’s bedrooms to ensure they use condoms? Will we bring back the chastity belt? No — the only way to “force” people to not become or remain pregnant is to sterilize them or make them have abortions.
But what manner of insanity is this? “Social deterioration”? Is Holdren seriously suggesting that “some” people contribute to social deterioration more than others, and thus should be sterilized or forced to have abortions, to prevent them from propagating their kind? Isn’t that eugenics, plain and simple? And isn’t eugenics universally condemned as a grotesquely evil practice?
We’ve already been down this road before. In one of the most shameful episodes in the history of U.S. jurisprudence, the Supreme Court ruled in the infamous 1927 Buck v. Bell case that the State of Virginia had had the right to sterilize a woman named Carrie Buck against her will, based solely on the (spurious) criteria that she was “feeble-minded” and promiscuous, with Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes concluding, “Three generations of imbeciles are enough.” Nowadays, of course, we look back on that ruling in horror, as eugenics as a concept has been forever discredited. In fact, the United Nations now regards forced sterilization as a crime against humanity.
The italicized phrase at the end (”providing they are not denied equal protection”), which Holdren seems to think gets him off the eugenics hook, refers to the 14th Amendment (as you will see in the more complete version of this passage quoted below), meaning that the eugenics program wouldn’t be racially based or discriminatory — merely based on the whim and assessments of government bureaucrats deciding who and who is not an undesirable. If some civil servant in Holdren’s America determines that you are “contributing to social deterioration” by being promiscuous or pregnant or both, will government agents break down your door and and haul you off kicking and screaming to the abortion clinic? In fact, the Supreme Court case Skinner v. Oklahoma already determined that the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment distinctly prohibits state-sanctioned sterilization being applied unequally to only certain types of people.
No no, you say, Holdren isn’t claiming that some kind of people contribute to social deterioration more than others; rather, he’s stating that anyone who overproduces children thereby contributes to social deterioration and needs to be stopped from having more. If so — how is that more palatable? It seems Holdren and his co-authors have not really thought this through, because what they are suggesting is a nightmarish totalitarian society. What does he envision: All women who commit the crime of having more than two children be dragged away by police to the government-run sterilization centers? Or — most disturbingly of all — perhaps Holdren has thought it through, and is perfectly OK with the kind of dystopian society he envisions in this book.
Sure, I could imagine a bunch of drunken guys sitting around shooting the breeze, expressing these kinds of forbidden thoughts; who among us hasn’t looked in exasperation at a harried mother buying candy bars and soda for her immense brood of unruly children and thought: Lady, why don’t you just get your tubes tied already? But it’s a different matter when the Science Czar of the United States suggests the very same thing officially in print. It ceases being a harmless fantasy, and suddenly the possibility looms that it could become government policy. And then it’s not so funny anymore.
Page 838: Nothing is wrong or illegal about the government dictating family size
“In today’s world, however, the number of children in a family is a matter of profound public concern. The law regulates other highly personal matters. For example, no one may lawfully have more than one spouse at a time. Why should the law not be able to prevent a person from having more than two children?”
Why should the law not be able to prevent a person from having more than two children?
Why?
I’ll tell you why, John. Because the the principle of habeas corpus upon which our nation rests automatically renders any compulsory abortion scheme to be unconstitutional, since it guarantees the freedom of each individual’s body from detention or interference, until that person has been convicted of a crime. Or are you seriously suggesting that, should bureaucrats decide that the country is overpopulated, the mere act of pregnancy be made a crime?
I am no legal scholar, but it seems that John Holdren is even less of a legal scholar than I am. Many of the bizarre schemes suggested in Ecoscience rely on seriously flawed legal reasoning. The book is not so much about science, but instead is about reinterpreting the Constitution to allow totalitarian population-control measures.
Page 942-3: A “Planetary Regime” should control the global economy and dictate by force the number of children allowed to be born
Toward a Planetary Regime
“Perhaps those agencies, combined with UNEP and the United Nations population agencies, might eventually be developed into a Planetary Regime—sort of an international superagency for population, resources, and environment. Such a comprehensive Planetary Regime could control the development, administration, conservation, and distribution of all natural resources, renewable or nonrenewable, at least insofar as international implications exist. Thus the Regime could have the power to control pollution not only in the atmosphere and oceans, but also in such freshwater bodies as rivers and lakes that cross international boundaries or that discharge into the oceans. The Regime might also be a logical central agency for regulating all international trade, perhaps including assistance from DCs to LDCs, and including all food on the international market.”
“The Planetary Regime might be given responsibility for determining the optimum population for the world and for each region and for arbitrating various countries’ shares within their regional limits. Control of population size might remain the responsibility of each government, but the Regime would have some power to enforce the agreed limits.”
In case you were wondering exactly who would enforce these forced abortion and mass sterilization laws: Why, it’ll be the “Planetary Regime”! Of course! I should have seen that one coming.
The rest of this passage speaks for itself. Once you add up all the things the Planetary Regime (which has a nice science-fiction ring to it, doesn’t it?) will control, it becomes quite clear that it will have total power over the global economy, since according to Holdren this Planetary Regime will control “all natural resources, renewable or nonrenewable” (which basically means all goods) as well as all food, and commerce on the oceans and any rivers “that discharge into the oceans” (i.e. 99% of all navigable rivers). What’s left? Not much.
Page 917: We will need to surrender national sovereignty to an armed international police force
“If this could be accomplished, security might be provided by an armed international organization, a global analogue of a police force. Many people have recognized this as a goal, but the way to reach it remains obscure in a world where factionalism seems, if anything, to be increasing. The first step necessarily involves partial surrender of sovereignty to an international organization.”
The other shoe drops. So: We are expected to voluntarily surrender national sovereignty to an international organization (the “Planetary Regime,” presumably), which will be armed and have the ability to act as a police force. And we saw in the previous quote exactly which rules this armed international police force will be enforcing: compulsory birth control, and all economic activity.
It would be laughable if Holdren weren’t so deadly serious. Do you want this man to be in charge of science and technology in the United States? Because he already is in charge.
Page 749: Pro-family and pro-birth attitudes are caused by ethnic chauvinism
“Another related issue that seems to encourage a pronatalist attitude in many people is the question of the differential reproduction of social or ethnic groups. Many people seem to be possessed by fear that their group may be outbred by other groups. White Americans and South Africans are worried there will be too many blacks, and vice versa. The Jews in Israel are disturbed by the high birth rates of Israeli Arabs, Protestants are worried about Catholics, and lbos about Hausas. Obviously, if everyone tries to outbreed everyone else, the result will be catastrophe for all. This is another case of the “tragedy of the commons,” wherein the “commons” is the planet Earth. Fortunately, it appears that, at least in the DCs, virtually all groups are exercising reproductive restraint.”
This passage is not particularly noteworthy except for the inclusion of the odd phrase “pronatalist attitude,” which Holdren spends much of the book trying to undermine. And what exactly is a “pronatalist attitude”? Basically it means the urge to have children, and to like babies. If only we could suppress people’s natural urge to want children and start families, we could solve all our problems!
What’s disturbing to me is the incredibly patronizing and culturally imperialist attitude he displays here, basically acting like he has the right to tell every ethnic group in the world that they should allow themselves to go extinct or at least not increase their populations any more. How would we feel if Andaman Islanders showed up on the steps of the Capitol in Washington D.C. and announced that there were simply too many Americans, and we therefore are commanded to stop breeding immediately? One imagines that the attitude of every ethnic group in the world to John Holdren’s proposal would be: Cram it, John. Stop telling us what to do.
Page 944: As of 1977, we are facing a global overpopulation catastrophe that must be resolved at all costs by the year 2000
“Humanity cannot afford to muddle through the rest of the twentieth century; the risks are too great, and the stakes are too high. This may be the last opportunity to choose our own and our descendants’ destiny. Failing to choose or making the wrong choices may lead to catastrophe. But it must never be forgotten that the right choices could lead to a much better world.”
This is the final paragraph of the book, which I include here only to show how embarrassingly inaccurate his “scientific” projections were. In 1977, Holdren thought we were teetering on the brink of global catastrophe, and he proposed implementing fascistic rules and laws to stave off the impending disaster. Luckily, we ignored his warnings, yet the world managed to survive anyway without the need to punish ourselves with the oppressive society which Holdren proposed. Yes, there still is overpopulation, but the problems it causes are not as morally repugnant as the “solutions” which John Holdren wanted us to adopt.
SCREENSHOTS OF PAGES FROM ECOSCIENCE (CLICK FOR ENLARGEMENTS)
| Front cover | Back cover | Title page |
 |
 |
 |
| Page 749 | Page 786 | Page 787 |
 |
 |
 |
| Page 788 | Page 789 | Page 837 |
 |
 |
 |
| Page 838 | Page 839 | Page 917 |
 |
 |
 |
| Page 942 | Page 943 | Page 944 |
 |
 |
 |
| Page 1001 | Page 1002 | Page 1003 |
 |
 |
 |
It is important to point out that John Holdren has never publicly distanced himself from any of these positions in the 32 years since the book was first published. Indeed, as you can see from the first picture that accompanies this article, Holdren prominently displays a copy of the book in his own personal library and is happy to be photographed with it.
It is also important to stress that these are not just the opinions of one man. As we have exhaustively documented, most recently in our essay, The Population Reduction Agenda For Dummies, the positions adopted in this book echo those advocated by numerous other prominent public figures in politics, academia and the environmental movement for decades.
Consider the fact that people like David Rockefeller, Ted Turner, and Bill Gates, three men who have integral ties to the eugenicist movement, recently met with other billionaire “philanthropists” in New York to discuss “how their wealth could be used to slow the growth of the world’s population,” according to a London Times report.
Ted Turner has publicly advocated shocking population reduction programs that would cull the human population by a staggering 95%. He has also called for a Communist-style one child policy to be mandated by governments in the west.
Of course, Turner completely fails to follow his own rules on how everyone else should live their lives, having five children and owning no less than 2 million acres of land.
In the third world, Turner has contributed literally billions to population reduction, namely through United Nations programs, leading the way for the likes of Bill & Melinda Gates and Warren Buffet (Gates’ father has long been a leading board member of Planned Parenthood and a top eugenicist).
The notion that these elitists merely want to slow population growth in order to improve health is a complete misnomer. Slowing the growth of the world’s population while also improving its health are two irreconcilable concepts to the elite. Stabilizing world population is a natural byproduct of higher living standards, as has been proven by the stabilization of the white population in the west. Elitists like David Rockefeller have no interest in “slowing the growth of world population” by natural methods, their agenda is firmly rooted in the pseudo-science of eugenics, which is all about “culling” the surplus population via draconian methods.
David Rockefeller’s legacy is not derived from a well-meaning “philanthropic” urge to improve health in third world countries, it is born out of a Malthusian drive to eliminate the poor and those deemed racially inferior, using the justification of social Darwinism.
As is documented in Alex Jones’ seminal film Endgame, Rockefeller’s father, John D. Rockefeller, exported eugenics to Germany from its origins in Britain by bankrolling the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute which later would form a central pillar in the Third Reich’s ideology of the Nazi super race. After the fall of the Nazis, top German eugenicists were protected by the allies as the victorious parties fought over who would enjoy their “expertise” in the post-war world.
The justification for the implementation of draconian measures of population control has changed to suit contemporary fads and trends. What once masqueraded as concerns surrounding overpopulation has now returned in the guise of the climate change and global warming movement. What has not changed is the fact that at its core, this represents nothing other than the arcane pseudo-science of eugenics first crafted by the U.S. and British elite at the end of the 19th century and later embraced by Nazi leader Adolf Hitler.
In the 21st century, the eugenics movement has changed its stripes once again, manifesting itself through the global carbon tax agenda and the notion that having too many children or enjoying a reasonably high standard of living is destroying the planet through global warming, creating the pretext for further regulation and control over every facet of our lives.
The fact that the chief scientific advisor to the President of the United States, a man with his finger on the pulse of environmental policy, once openly advocated the mass sterilization of the U.S. public through the food and water supply, along with the plethora of other disgusting proposals highlighted in Ecoscience, is a frightening prospect that wouldn’t be out of place in some kind of futuristic sci-fi horror movie, and a startling indictment of the true source of what manifests itself today as the elitist controlled top-down environmental movement.
Only through bringing to light Holdren’s shocking and draconian population control plans can we truly alert people to the horrors that the elite have planned for us through population control, sterilization and genocidal culling programs that are already underway.
-
- Social bookmarks
- Email this article
-
- Print this page
- Share on Twitter
July 11th, 2009 at 2:14 pm
way to blow another minor thing out of proportion.
RightofRush Reply:
July 11th, 2009 at 2:35 pm
“way to blow another minor thing out of proportion.”
A MINOR thing out of proportion? How uncool can you get?
“cool” is either insensitive, has low reading comprehension, or is drinking the NWO cool-aid. Maybe all of the preceding.
Bohemian Rove Reply:
July 11th, 2009 at 8:38 pm
Thanks for unearthing this priceless archival verification. Screen shots mandatory. Maybe this will convince some of my derisive, doubting associates that all of this is true- esp as most of these edicts are now in public progress.
Tim Reply:
July 11th, 2009 at 9:10 pm
9/11 Cover Is Blown – British and Saudi Intelligence are Culprits
Intelligence Report here:
http://www.larouchepac.com/node/10997
RightofRush Reply:
July 11th, 2009 at 2:44 pm
“way to blow another minor thing out of proportion.”
A MINOR thing? What an uncool think to say. “cool” has either low reading comprehension or is drinking NWO kool-aid.
N8 Reply:
July 11th, 2009 at 3:00 pm
Blow a minor thing out of proportion?
This man is Tyranny on an epic level!!!
Here are a few quotes from the original front page article!
Holdren believed a world government might play a moderate role in the future: setting and enforcing appopriate population levels, taxing and redistributing the world’s wealth, controlling the world’s resources, and operating a standing World Army
Holdren explicitly reaffirmed it in his 1995 Nobel Prize acceptance speech on behalf of Pugwash, declaiming, “The post-Cold-War world needs a more powerful United Nations, probably with a standing volunteer force — owing loyalty directly to the UN rather than to contingents from individual nations.”
Holdren noted that reducing “GDP per person” — that is, cutting your personal wealth — also reduces Greenhouse Gas emissions
His reply to whether American citizens should be tried for a capital offense because they exercised their First Amendment rights to disagree with him was a firm maybe.
How is this blowing another minor thing out of proportion! This man is an enemy of the state, an enemy of Humanity. The only thing keeping the American people safe at the present moment is the 2nd Amendment!
John Henke Reply:
July 11th, 2009 at 4:01 pm
Well said N8.
We must remember the face of this Nazi son of a bitch so we don’t miss him during the post revolution hangings.
And he is one of Obango Congos top advisors! Good God is this nation in trouble!
GOD HELP US! LLONG LIVE THE REVOLUTION! GOD SAVE AMERICA!
Hawk Reply:
July 13th, 2009 at 8:57 am
“We must remember the face of this Nazi son of a bitch so we don’t miss him during the post revolution hangings.”
No doubt. Any of these sick bastards that comes to sterilize me for the “betterment of humanity” is going to get a .38 Smith & Wesson in the face. Wir gehen nicht ruhig!!!!!!
Jo-Bob Reply:
July 13th, 2009 at 8:42 pm
“The post-Cold-War world needs a more powerful United Nations, probably with a standing volunteer force — owing loyalty directly to the UN rather than to contingents from individual nations.”
Holdren noted that reducing “GDP per person” — that is, cutting your personal wealth — also reduces Greenhouse Gas emissions”
I don’t understand why anyone would consider this as “Bad”. BTW, GDP per Person ODES NOT equate to personal wealth.
Bohemian Rove Reply:
July 11th, 2009 at 8:41 pm
Cool
One item is a fluke, two an anomoly- but dozens of examples over decades is not just a pattern it is a PLAN.
Turn off your TV and scale back on those meds, zombie.
Chris Yuhas Reply:
July 11th, 2009 at 3:08 pm
Cool… you are either a brainwashed Bilderberger, or blatantly for Bilderberg. Either way Bilderbergers are going to lose every war they’ve started against mankind. They’re losing the spread of true information war and they’re losing their quest of spreading disinformation. You are another feeble attempt of disinformation.
Go Alex… keep spreading the truth!
roaddog Reply:
July 11th, 2009 at 3:50 pm
cool….Looking the other way on this issue, like you and herd members like you, are exactly why we’re in this position now.
dead dog Reply:
July 11th, 2009 at 10:37 pm
weren’t you the same roaddog asshat that was posting s--- about some s---ty Youtube page on “Alex Jones Exposed as a Disinfo”???
jim cunningham Reply:
July 12th, 2009 at 8:50 pm
yeah, he is, the “alex jones deception”. i think this guy is a brit. or, already conquered.
David.Rockefeller Reply:
July 11th, 2009 at 3:57 pm
POPULATION CONTROL NOW.
WE MUST GET RID OF THE USELESS EATERS.
Barack Obama Reply:
July 11th, 2009 at 6:18 pm
I agree. Kill all those useless brown people…… oh, s---, hold up……….
Incubeus Reply:
July 11th, 2009 at 6:52 pm
All I can say is WTF!! There is a million things wrong with this concept. Didn’t realize communism was so popular.
Not On My Watch Reply:
July 11th, 2009 at 8:35 pm
Cool is a maniac like this is the top influential source on Scientific Policy for Our President and YOU think it’s “MINOR” I’d sure as hell hate to know what you think is a MAJOR threat to us….Bet you’ll sing a differant tune when they strap YOUR babymaker to the cuttingboard.People like YOU are why I left the cities.I wasn’t Raised on the family farm and I was pretty damned successful at my trade.I Reverted to this almost a decade ago because being Smothered with idiots like YOU was just too damned much for me to put up with.
July 11th, 2009 at 2:24 pm
Alex Jones: Fear mongering…. Once a violent revolution against the government has been started: his job’s been done. All Roads lead to Rome. Don’t be deceived by Wolves in Sheep’s clothing!
Not On My Watch Reply:
July 11th, 2009 at 8:45 pm
“Alex Jones: Fear mongering…. Once a violent revolution against the government has been started: his job’s been done. All Roads lead to Rome. Don’t be deceived by Wolves in Sheep’s clothing!”
Since when has Alex called for a Violent revolution?Would you care to elaborate on this clain?He might throw a nutty on his show now and then,but The VIOLENT types are kind of looking at him like he’s some Neo-Flowerchild.Most on these forums or involved in the movement are against trning our country into a Bloodbath.Those Kids in the National Guard are Still somebody’s Baby.Nobody is jumping for joy at the thought of a Bloody Revolution.I won’t run from it , but I sure as hell am not running TO it either.
showmebby Reply:
July 11th, 2009 at 9:07 pm
Agreed , good post .
Hawk Reply:
July 13th, 2009 at 9:00 am
Agreed. If violence can be avoided, it should. But I’m not a Buddhist with a gun for nothing…if I’m forced to use it to protect friends, family, or myself, I will. And God help the servants of the dajjal when they come.
EVERYBODYDOGFOOD Reply:
July 21st, 2009 at 8:13 am
STFUP WITH THAT s--- WE ALL KNOW ABOUT THE FREAKIN NAZI POPE AND MR JONES HAS STATED IT SEVERAL TIMES FIND ANOTHER FREAKIN HORSE TO BEAT.THIS ONES f---IN DEAD ALREADY.
REALTRUTHER YOU SUX DEVIL BAALS
July 11th, 2009 at 2:25 pm
##########SPREAD THIS INFORMATION##########
**Wall Street criminals exposed By Marcy K.**
kaptur.house.gov/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=289&Itemid=1
youtube.com/watch?v=S27yitK32ds
youtube.com/watch?v=oAADyc6t4nY
**Rep. Alan Grayson asks the FEDERAL RESERVE Inspector General where the money is gone…**
youtube.com/watch?v=PXlxBeAvsB8
HQ version: youtube.com/watch?v=cJqM2tFOxLQ
#####TAKE ACTION – END THE CRIMINAL RESERVE#####
Bills to be supported: ‘S 604′ and HR 1207 (information and SAMPLE LETTER here)
http://www.ronpaul.com/on-the-.....ve-hr-1207
&
campaignforliberty.com/campaigns/auditthefed.php
Senators Who are NOT Co-Sponsors of S 604 (Sister Bill to HR 1207)
scribd.com/doc/16483157
senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm
::::UPDATE:::
HOUSE – HR 1207: 260 co-sponsors
SENATE – S 604: 8 co-sponsors
July 11th, 2009 at 2:43 pm
I just never understood why these people would intentionally blow their cover by publishing this kind of information in books so that the public at large has access to them? The answer most often given is that they like to throw it in our faces or they just believe that we’re too apathetic to find out for ourselves. I find it hard to believe that they’d be so careless.
zac Reply:
July 11th, 2009 at 4:30 pm
they like to show how powerful they are. It’s all about power.
The swede Reply:
July 14th, 2009 at 4:33 am
If they hide it the ide will wither and die so to gain suport they need to publish. But then its a two edge sword.
Karen Reply:
July 11th, 2009 at 8:16 pm
They have said why. They don’t think anyone will believe it and if someone does believe it they think nothing will come of it.
Not On My Watch Reply:
July 11th, 2009 at 8:47 pm
Gee I wonder why his thinking in that book Perfectligns with Zbigbrother’s Book arround the same time………
adam blavatski Reply:
July 12th, 2009 at 4:39 am
They declare their full intentions for humanity- and then see the non-response by the public
as a mandate to carry out their crimes against us- not that they need our permission, of course- they already hold us in contempt!
We need to rise up and end the tyranny of these Nazi/Elitist/bankster/Eugenicist/Luciferians NOW!!!!!!!
jim cunningham Reply:
July 12th, 2009 at 8:52 pm
best place to hide something is out in the open
July 11th, 2009 at 2:59 pm
they’ve just invented ARTIFICIAL SPERM – is anyone else confused to death now?
crazycanuck Reply:
July 11th, 2009 at 9:51 pm
My sperm are really confused unto death right now.
halo14 Reply:
July 12th, 2009 at 6:32 pm
confused about what? the totalitarian control of the healthcare system will shunt that technology to where ever they want it to be. no cognitive dissonance here.
July 11th, 2009 at 3:00 pm
As a female, this is frightening to read. Not that I want kids anyway, but the government shouldn’t tell me how or what to do with my body! Only God can!
This is being done in China. Why shouldn’t they do it here? -__-
July 11th, 2009 at 3:01 pm
Man, Thats some crazy shyte! and this dude is the Science advisor? Youd think Hed author hinself onto a ‘not fit for duty’ list of some sort, but No…INSANE.
July 11th, 2009 at 3:08 pm
Отлично написано. Позитива конечно не хватает, но читал на одном дыхании
adam blavatski Reply:
July 12th, 2009 at 4:48 am
Yes, as Pooliinkka says, it is excellently written- but it certainly isn’t positive………
Имейте славный день, Poollinnkka!
July 11th, 2009 at 3:14 pm
***************************EVERYONE!****************************GET ALEX’S DVD’s into the hands of EVERY police officer and EVERY military personel IN YOUR LOCAL AREA!!! DO———-IT————–NOW!!!
July 11th, 2009 at 3:14 pm
Даже и не докопаешься.
Alex Reply:
July 11th, 2009 at 6:53 pm
Yeah, Derka-Derka to you too…
adam blavatski Reply:
July 12th, 2009 at 4:31 am
Poollinka was saying that ” even you will not dig yourself” lol
Keep listening to Alex, and keep buying his DVDs!
Алекс Jones человек!
July 11th, 2009 at 3:20 pm
THESE NAZI MOTHER f---ERS ALL NEED TO HAVE A POST BIRTH ABORTION.
AncientChild Reply:
July 11th, 2009 at 6:19 pm
lol well said
July 11th, 2009 at 3:28 pm
Nice to see that InfoWars posted this article here, for all to see. Now you have to ask yourself, with this article and Rep. Hastings calling for FEMA camps (read the article here: http://hotair.com/archives/200.....s-of-2009/ ), when will they make the move?
Get READY America!
Karen Reply:
July 11th, 2009 at 8:20 pm
OK,Hastings needs to be on the list for crimes against humanity and for being a traitor.
July 11th, 2009 at 3:28 pm
STOP DELETING MY POSTS! FREEDOM OF SPEECH!!!
jim cunningham Reply:
July 12th, 2009 at 8:55 pm
they dont delete them, the page has errors. dont post more than twice and dont refresh the page.
July 11th, 2009 at 3:29 pm
it’s nice to read something on this issue who identifies as pro-choice—the anti-choice religious nutbirds are usually the only ones we hear from on this issue.
Not On My Watch Reply:
July 11th, 2009 at 8:56 pm
I am neither Pro or Anti, but I believe that the one law that God abides by end even Satan can’t break is “Free Will”.That’s why They have to Trick us and despite this trickery they are forced to telegraph clues to what they are going to pull next.This is tricking people on a global scale to commit self inflicted Genocide.In the eyes of god (anyone’s God) Murder is Murder and a SOUL dosn’t have a Trimester based limit.To ME it’s murder.But it’s Your choice.Choose wisely.
Nutbird-Not Reply:
July 12th, 2009 at 11:56 pm
Hey Coppulator:
People who believe life begins at conception aren’t nutbirds any more than people who kill babies.
July 11th, 2009 at 3:29 pm
Like he says. Plus….the time may also come when they may have to inspect baies that are born with defects to discard them in order to maintain only healthy strains of people. Or perhaps like it did happend during the time of Moses or when Christ was born that a great many infants were sacrificed. As if abortion does not kill enough babies.
Hawk Reply:
July 13th, 2009 at 9:02 am
The powers that be are culling infants NOW to try and prevent the coming of the Mahdi. Dead Palestinian babies say what?
July 11th, 2009 at 3:37 pm
If you want to keep a secret, you should put it in a book. only 3% of people read a book after high school.
This book is no surprise to us, where is the publishing of this article in major newspapers? Get the sheeple involved.
MjkaG Reply:
July 12th, 2009 at 9:55 pm
About a year ago I watched a 60 Minutes interview with Ted Turner (mentioned above as supporting the eugenicist movement) where he discused the hundreds of billions of dollars that he personally spent to “restructure and reshape our national news media” to make it what it should be. Do you think it cost that much to make the news media “fair and unbiased”? Do you think Ted’s media will help make something like this common knowledge?
July 11th, 2009 at 3:42 pm
oh–and as an adoptee, who had to wait nearly forty years before a change in the laws of massachussetts allowed me to reunite with my birthparents, can i just say that forcing women to relinquish children for adoption is even more evil than forcing them to abort.
roaddog Reply:
July 11th, 2009 at 3:54 pm
coppo—This issue here goes beyond “pro-choice” or “abortion is murder”. Both of those issues are choice. What they’re talking about here is no choice what-so-ever.
July 11th, 2009 at 3:43 pm
Maybe it shoulda started with Holdren’s mother.
July 11th, 2009 at 3:43 pm
I have travelled alot…seen many places and been in few countries. And after all I have seen, The world is EMPTY! Most population are jamed one on top of the another in major cities. That is why when they tell us we are alot …we look at each other and around us in big cities and say ..yep we are alot !!!! But teh truth is something else , the truth lies Miles away out of major cities, the truth lies in million acres lands and villages , small cities almost empty. This world is HUGE! Much bigger than what you think and IMAGINE. Here in Europe we have laods of isolated cities, villages with huge agricultural lands gone to waste, and turned into ghost towns. Even a small country like France is HUGE for it’s 50 or 60 million pôpulation. Paris is populated…Sheeplets that live and work in Paris , and hardly get time to travel around the country or even THINK , those are the ones that create monsters telling us we are many, because they keep repeating like a parrot , what the elites trying to sell us as a big LIE. Every day , every second, thousands DIE because of all reasons and less born. As far as I know , the death rate in every second is much more than a Birth rate. Anyways ,enjoy your life , stay strong and don’t buy their lies.
July 11th, 2009 at 3:46 pm
vive la monde…vive les enfants …vive la VIE
Chips Reply:
July 11th, 2009 at 5:36 pm
Mais oui!
July 11th, 2009 at 3:51 pm
John P. Holdren is nothing more than a modern witchdoctor, a quack. And Obama appointed this clown to “Science Czar”? Wow. It really is worse than 1984.
July 11th, 2009 at 3:59 pm
everyone on earth could fit on australia comfortably with enough room to have a garden that can provide most of their food.
Fight with non compliance
Alex you do a lot for us but you still comply with the system.
stop paying taxes they are illegal period.
watch all of the movies by Maxwell Igan Fight the NWO with non compliance, The Calling, The awakening. Share these with everyone you know
We are many and they are few. We can stop them. We are all one.
July 11th, 2009 at 4:02 pm
Please………….
Obama is a evil maniac! He is in great need of meds and maybe hospitalization and the idiot who co authored this book needs a wake up call? If you stop and think this one out this idiot did this years ago and people make mistakes but if he is giving Obama this kind of advice now he needs to step down! If he does not and they try and impliment any of these nazi measures then it is time for an armed people to overthrow this government!
For now be the watchers and train for the worst and pray for the best!
http://www.americasrepublicmilitia.net
Karen Reply:
July 11th, 2009 at 8:23 pm
Well thanks for the tip but the site looks like a kooks site. The font is too large and therfore hard to read because it’s spread out over the entire page. Make the font smaller.
July 11th, 2009 at 4:03 pm
To be sure, John Holdren isn’t qualified to clean toilets or run a hot dog stand. He believes in sterilization drugs in the water, other methods of forced sterilization, forced abortion, and laws against having more than two kids. The only logical question is why doesn’t he just kill himself? He would be doing us all a favor and, in his view, saving the earth. He is no doubt mentally ill
Du bist einfach Hässlech Reply:
July 11th, 2009 at 7:46 pm
These people never practice what they preach. What is the real icing on the cake is that according to medical professionals (that are actual doctors not self righteous douches like this guy) say that long term use of birth control can cause CANCER. That means super-population control. With the destruction of industry in this country they’ll need to kill off as many people as possible and people sick from chemotherapy won’t be able to resist. Assuming Obamacare doesn’t make it illegal because it isn’t “cost effective”.
July 11th, 2009 at 4:18 pm
what this so called “scientist” doesn’t realize is he’s being sterilized as well.
July 11th, 2009 at 4:21 pm
God’s Perfect Laws of Liberty exists, while Obama is prefering SATAN’s law.
July 11th, 2009 at 5:44 pm
Sure is hard to find the science in all this, but easy to find the psychosis.
July 11th, 2009 at 5:47 pm
none of you people are going to do s--- about it.
Karen Reply:
July 11th, 2009 at 6:33 pm
I have afew ideas but I would appreciate any you might have.
I have said this before. I am going to take a video of choice (End Game) and deliver it to my local city and surrounding counties. Specifically my targets are, city council, mayor, office of city business license, governor, church secretaries, state patrol, police, fire stations, post office, state representatives, national representatives and to the officers of my home owners association.
The Glorified Janitor Reply:
July 11th, 2009 at 10:46 pm
The best thing you can do is buy air time on public access TV. I saw the money changers on public access TV in the early 90’s and it was an awakening. The Obama Deception needs to be on Public access TV every day.
July 11th, 2009 at 6:20 pm
bob is completely right, you guys read this site, and other sites, 24/7, talk about bulls--- theories, but do nothing but sit on your ass.
Ben Reply:
July 11th, 2009 at 7:50 pm
Why are idle talkers and lazy readers of this kind of site branded as enemies of the state, or even barred for buying guns, if they will do nothing about tyranny?
Pack a gun and pay no tax.
Not On My Watch Reply:
July 11th, 2009 at 9:40 pm
“bob is completely right, you guys read this site, and other sites, 24/7, talk about bulls--- theories, but do nothing but sit on your ass.”
Is that so?While I am sure there are some here that might fit that sizing.I Think you need to worry about what YOU’RE doing.I don’t need to explain what steps I have taken or what future ones I soon will take to YOU.
Hawk Reply:
July 13th, 2009 at 9:06 am
Bob – Seems like you’re sitting around on your idle ass reading NWO theory as well as any of the rest here. Shouldn’t you be out on the shooting range my friend?
July 11th, 2009 at 6:24 pm
Any minute now I just know I’m going to find out all of this is not true. Any minute now.
Hell is not big enough for the number of people involved in evil.
July 11th, 2009 at 7:51 pm
so obama has 2 kids, um i wonder what happen there
July 11th, 2009 at 7:53 pm
people are scare s---less to do anything, what happen when you kick out BB group? US would no better than the dinosaur age. War, death, destruction.
July 11th, 2009 at 8:31 pm
my comments didn’t show up, maybe they will now that I wrote this; and this will, then, look stupid.
July 11th, 2009 at 8:34 pm
The Fuhrer would have LOVED this guy. Is this Obama’s Himmler?
July 11th, 2009 at 9:23 pm
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YkZa4lbXExo
why are they flying chemtrails?
home video evidence
f--- THE NEW WORLD ORDER!!!!!!!!!!!!!
YEAH 13 !
BAD LUCK 4 YOU FUX!
AMERICA IS WOKE UPP!
July 11th, 2009 at 9:54 pm
Notice Holdren’s “O.J. forehead” — the “I’m innocent” look that people who are guilty of something often exhibit involuntarily.
Ben Reply:
July 12th, 2009 at 12:20 pm
You understand body language. Now that you point this out, I notice it, too.
Pack a gun and pay no tax.
July 11th, 2009 at 10:00 pm
THE vast majority of AMERICA is still asleep sydwayz.
July 11th, 2009 at 10:04 pm
I actually agree with this. Too many dumb people are having children, and i am having to pay for there births/education. Controlling the population is fine, its not like humans are actually decent beings of this planet. Oh no!! Billy-Joe Bob was forcely aborted!! We lost a moron ok people? We should celebrate this kind of news. This kind of New World Order idea makes me smile at the idea of globalism and enslavement.
Andrew Reply:
July 12th, 2009 at 7:05 am
my god I hope your joking, otherwise please start with yourself and leave this Earth as you wish on others, and as for your upbringing, enslavement is in the mind, it is clear years is enslaved and you know that is sad.
Hawk Reply:
July 13th, 2009 at 9:13 am
Joey – Easy thing to say, until someone determines that YOU are the stupid beast deemed expendable. We’ll see where everyone stands when s--- hits the fan with Agenda 21. The sheep will go to slaughter with a smile on their face, and the wolves who smell fire on the wind will run.
Anyone who supports the New World Order should just crouch down and lick the hand that feeds them. May your chains rest lightly upon you and may posterity forget that you were our countrymen.
When FEMA gasses your ass in the name of population control, I will have a much harder time feeling sorry for you.
July 11th, 2009 at 11:01 pm
I have suspected for a long time that many Democrats were trying to control the minority population, most of us know the Republicans more specificly Neo-cons were ingaged in a subtle genocide of blacks and Homosexuals with the AIDS virus while democrats were turning the baby mills on full speed. Now that we have a black president they can get away with all kinds of stuff.
I really don’t think it will matter though. The whole world will look chinese in 50 years any way.
July 11th, 2009 at 11:46 pm
Totalitarian population control? They’ll get their wish when Jesus comes back to rapture His Church home to Heaven before the tribulation.
Are you Ready? Make Jesus your savior now.
joe Reply:
July 12th, 2009 at 5:07 am
actually, biblical support for a ‘pre-trib’ rapture is slim-to-none and was only made popular in the 1900s due largely to the wishful thinking of prominent church members. I have yet to be convinced.
July 12th, 2009 at 5:59 am
Words are not Tyranny. Action is. What is being “done” rather than simply “said”?
Ben Reply:
July 12th, 2009 at 12:24 pm
What is being done can’t be said yet.
Pack a gun and pay no tax.
July 12th, 2009 at 6:03 am
PROOF IN THIS VIDEO, SPREAD IT LIKE FIRE: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v.....amp;fmt=22
OzyBoy Reply:
July 12th, 2009 at 7:04 am
Now now. As long as he’s dead is enough. I don’t think we need to shower his murders with praise. A simple “thanks” will do.
July 12th, 2009 at 7:02 am
It’s unfailing. EVERYONE that suggests population reduction is suggesting those “at the bottom” should go first.
But its the very wealthy that consume the most. Why not start from the top down. Gates, Rockefeller, Rothschild are first to go. And their obscene wealth can be distributed down the pyramid for a change.
Wartooth Reply:
July 13th, 2009 at 12:04 am
That’s a GREAT idea Ozy. The trickle down effect. Kill the richest and have their money trickle down on us.
July 12th, 2009 at 9:13 am
Anyone been paying attention to the newly introduced “Food Storage Bill”? I think it’s HR2479 or HR2749 … anyway just google food storage bill and it will turn up. This article could be the reasoning behind it.
July 12th, 2009 at 10:02 am
Humm maybe we should start putting together refugee camps in America. To take refuge from our government?
Free from government intervention. Live w/o paying taxes grow your own food so you know it is not tainted. Free firearms ,evasion and resistance training. Wow sounds like a terrorist camp.
It would be wise for our government to listen to Sun Tzu’s words.
July 12th, 2009 at 10:36 am
Great work, Wattie! How revealing. At this rate, obama will have more than double the psychopaths whispering in his ear. jeez.
July 12th, 2009 at 10:37 am
…Double that of Georgie boy, that is.
July 12th, 2009 at 12:23 pm
I appreciate the ability to read the excerpts in the limited context you provide. It is sufficient to allow me to dismiss your opinion for the hysterical fearmongering that it is.
I’m sure the ability to persuse the text in it’s entirety would only further discredit your ill-concieved notions.
July 12th, 2009 at 2:01 pm
This is a really well done mega-article. I think it could be used to wake up your friends who “just need more proof”. God bless you all.
July 12th, 2009 at 2:53 pm
What we sow, we reap. Murder 50 million babies, don’t be surprised when the murder circles around and the murderees (the 2/3 of pregnancies that survive) become the murderers! America is going to pay a terrible price for our atrocities. Read Revelation 17 and 18 to see how God is going to bring about our judgment. Repent of your sins and believe in the Lord Jesus Christ and you will be saved. Understand, however, that none of us will be spared from the judgment coming on this nation but we can be spared from an eternity in hell.
July 12th, 2009 at 4:28 pm
Looks like we have a volunteer to be the target of rotten tomoatoes and eggs whenever, wherever he speaks. I love it when they volunteer for this. If he comes to your town make sure you put a dozen eggs and a few tomotoes in the trunk of your car a couple of weeks ahead of time so they’re ready. Hard-boiled eggs work as well.
July 12th, 2009 at 5:09 pm
ill just leave this here
http://www.stanford.edu/group/morrinst/pdf/22.pdf
maelstrom Reply:
July 12th, 2009 at 5:24 pm
and this
http://www.stanford.edu/group/CCB/Pubs/paulpdfs/
July 12th, 2009 at 5:33 pm
Please publish the whole book on website so we can link it and email to everybody.
maelstrom Reply:
July 14th, 2009 at 3:41 pm
ditto that, i want the whole thing too. if it’s govt publication it belongs to the american people anyway, so screw amazon and google.
July 12th, 2009 at 5:33 pm
Do I hear the James Bond theme in the background… I always cheer for the bad guy in Bond films, because he’s always the one with the planet’s best interest at heart… like Christopher Walken playing Max Zorin… Zorin was trying to save the world from over population… it’s a general theme of many Bond films… as if secretly wishing… and it would seem, that wish has just become reality. So now the challenge is to save the world AND its population. We can’t just save the planet and not give a s*** about humanity. We’d only be saving it for a chosen few. Playboy models first to quote Dr. Strangelove.
July 13th, 2009 at 6:27 am
JOAN WAGAR WAS POISONING ME WHEN I WAS A PLASMA DONOR AND THE f---ING AUTHORITY’S HERE IN NAZI PORTLAND OREGON GAVE HER ASS PERMISSION!
THE AUTHORITY’S PUBLICLY PEDOFIED ME TO COVER UP THE FACT THAT A PLASMA DONOR WAS BEING POISONED!
AUTHORITY’S AND MY WIFE USED HER LOVER AS A f---ING BODY DOUBLE AND HE FRAMED ME BUT AUTHORITY’S DON’T WANT TO CHARGE ME, THEY JUST WANT TO MAKE ME LOOK LIKE A f---ING PEDO USING A BODY DOUBLE SO NO ONE WILL CARE WHEN THEY SHOOT ME!
PLAY YOUR SMOKE AND MIRRORS GAME PEDO’S YOU STILL GAVE JOAN WAGAR PERMISSION TO POISON PLASMA DONORS!
GOD DAMN SERIAL KILLERS!
July 13th, 2009 at 6:28 am
You don’t need this type of information to see the evil of the US government in action. All you have to do is read the front page of the paper. What this article does is give you some of the nuts and bolts of the types of creeps that are attracked to power and control to carry out their sick designs and take advantage of the majority of voters who are morally weak, wicked and bribed by the good life status quo to return the capitol building butchers to office election after election. People shouldn’t be surprised by the real scum legislators are and front for.
July 13th, 2009 at 7:20 am
i wonder why these people dont just off themselves to save the planet but they are hypocrites they only want to kill the lesser species of humans of so they can lord it over the rest of us this scum will be taken to task at trials and hung from the kneck untill they are dead
July 13th, 2009 at 7:31 am
this is upmost digusting. What an evil is running this government. It is by far mor evil then
nazigermany
July 13th, 2009 at 8:21 am
check this good site out, says it all really. Keep up teh great work AJ.
http://www.youre-so-naive.com
July 13th, 2009 at 12:56 pm
I went searching yesterday for Ecoscience: Population, Resources, Environment and I ordered from 3 places. Alll reported today that it is not available. I cannot find one to buy on the net. There were many to choose from too. Maybe many people got a hold of the book from here. I hope that this is the case. Otherwise, big brother may have gobbled them up!
July 13th, 2009 at 3:41 pm
http://www.radioliberty.com/stones.htm
“THE MESSAGE OF THE GEORGIA GUIDESTONES
1. Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.
2. Guide reproduction wisely – improving fitness and diversity.
3. Unite humanity with a living new language.
4. Rule passion – faith – tradition – and all things with tempered reason.
5. Protect people and nations with fair laws and just courts.
6. Let all nations rule internally resolving external disputes in a world court.
7. Avoid petty laws and useless officials.
8. Balance personal rights with social duties.
9. Prize truth – beauty – love – seeking harmony with the infinite.
10.Be not a cancer on the earth – Leave room for nature – Leave room for nature.
Limiting the population of the earth to 500 million will require the extermination of nine-tenths of the world’s people.”
Actually, it is now 92% of the world’s population are considered by “them” as useless feeders and breeders.
It appears they are rapidly trying to rid this planet of humans to protect what is left of this planet for the remaining 8%.
And their number way of getting rid of us is through pharmaceutical companies and their frankenstein science of poisonous vaccines and lab created diseases, etc. as their other ways have not worked well enough such as AIDS and SARS and sugar and chemicals just have not killed enough of us fast enough so they are advancing new ways incrementally to get us!
July 15th, 2009 at 10:29 pm
There aren’t enough resources on earth to support the human population anymore. First of all, where are you going to put them and second of all, what are you going to feed them? We have limited space and food is already incredibly scarce in many of the worlds nations. It sounds scary, but eventually people are going to have to stop having so many kids. This guy seems like a crazy, but he identified a major problem long before many others have. It doesn’t have to be super totalitarian or anything – yet – but in the same way that China realized that it could not support such a numerous population and subsequently took action, we too must think about what must happen if people continue to have 3 or more kids. If we can’t solve this problem ourselves then somebody is going to have to step up and solve it for us.
EVERYBODYDOGFOOD Reply:
July 21st, 2009 at 8:10 am
YOUR A f---IN ASSHOLE START WITH YOURSELF THEN JACKOFF.
Michael Reply:
July 21st, 2009 at 11:49 am
I already have. I only have one kid and I’m stopping there. It’s not that hard to do something about it yourself. Just aim for 2 kids or less.. and spell “you’re” correctly, you f---nut.