President Obama suggested that radical Islamic groups such as ISIS, which beheads Christians and other Muslims for not obeying Sharia Law, can only be stopped if governments are willing to listen to their “legitimate grievances.”
“Governments that deny human rights play into the hands of extremists who claim that violence is the only way to achieve change,” he wrote in his op/ed published last night by the L.A. Times. “Efforts to counter violent extremism will only succeed if citizens can address legitimate grievances through the democratic process and express themselves through strong civil societies.”
Come on, how does ISIS, which subjects women to abnormal sex acts through forced marriages, executes children for watching soccer and beheads Christians using cinder blocks and machetes have “legitimate grievances?”
Here’s its grievance in a nutshell: obey Sharia Law or be brutally executed.
“Every day now, there are fresh news stories about Christians being slaughtered by ISIS in the Middle East,” Michael Snyder wrote. “So where is the outrage from the White House?”
There isn’t one because it doesn’t fit the president’s agenda to avoid labeling ISIS “Islamic terrorists.”
“The Obama administration’s refusal to use the term ‘Islamic terrorism’ has provoked widespread condemnation, but it fits perfectly with the federal government’s past approach to the war on terror, which has been to elevate the importance domestic extremism over the threat posed by Islamic terror,” Paul Joseph Watson and Alex Jones reported. “In planning this week’s summit on ‘combating violent extremists’ the White House ‘has consistently avoided naming Islamic extremism as its central focus,’ reports CNN, despite two deadly attacks carried out in the name of Islam in Paris and Copenhagen in just the last two months alone.”