 |
|
|
|||
 |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
 |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Obama’s Hitler Oath?
- Text size
Kurt Nimmo
Infowars
January 30, 2009
|
|
 |
|
| If true, Obama’s loyalty pledge would be little different than the one used by Hitler to extract loyalty from the German Wehrmacht. | |
Under the dictatorship of Adolf Hitler, German Wehrmacht officers and soldiers as well as civil servants pledged personal loyalty to the Führer, not the German constitution. It appears Obama has taken a page from Hitler’s authoritarian playbook, according to Michele Chang. “A spokesman for General James Cartwright, the Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, states that the Obama Administration wants to have soldiers and officers pledge a loyalty oath directly to the office of the President, and no longer to the Constitution,” Chang writes.
Chang’s assertion is not corroborated by the corporate media and other news sources.
The claim falls on the heels of Obama’s supposed flub of the oath of office, as explicitly prescribed in the Constitution, Article II, Section 1, which begins by saying the president shall take the oath “before he enter on the execution of his office.” Chief Justice John Roberts misplaced the word “faithfully.” In a technical sense, Obama did not take the oath or affirmation required by the United States Constitution, a fact widely dismissed by scholars and the corporate media. On the following day, Obama retook the oath in the privacy of the White House, sans not only the presence of television cameras, but a bible as well.
“What appears to be the authentic inauguration took place in a basement, and was an elite rather than a populist rite, with just nine witnesses,” writes Michael Hoffman. “It occurred in former President Franklin Roosevelt’s secretive, war-era ‘map room.’ Before FDR, under presidents from Chester Arthur through Wilson and Coolidge, it was reputedly used to play the game of billiards.”
“We believe the oath of office was administered effectively and that the president was sworn in appropriately yesterday,” White House Counsel Greg Craig said in a statement. “But the oath appears in the Constitution itself. And out of abundance of caution, because there was one word out of sequence, Chief Justice Roberts administered the oath a second time.”
- A d v e r t i s e m e n t
If Obama did indeed instruct the Pentagon to have soldiers and officers pledge a loyalty oath directly to the office of the President, this would be in keeping with earlier unconstitutional usurpations, most notably the issuance of executive orders, memorandums, proclamations, regulations and other flexing of presidential power. Executive orders are not mentioned in the Constitution. “Executive orders issued by the Bush administration have sparked fear in the minds of many Americans (professors, academics, and non-academics) who have reason to believe such executive orders could be used to make Bush a de facto dictator since many of these orders allow Bush to side-step the other branches of government and make autocratic laws,” explains Dahlia Lithwick.
In keeping with this tradition, Obama plans to issue his own spate of executive orders. “Some of the first executive orders will no doubt be pleasing to some of Barack Obama’s feminist supporters and will anger pro life supporters. Barack Obama will lift the restrictions on foreign aid to abortions that were imposed by President George W. Bush. Obama will also lift restrictions for federal funding of embryonic stem cell research,” writes Mark Whittington of Associated Content. It is expected Obama will also issue an executive order to reverse Bush’s opening of offshore areas and certain land areas such as Utah to oil exploration.
“The President feels that the military has been too indoctrinated by the old harbingers of hate: nationalism, racism, and classism. By removing an oath to the American society, the soldiers are less likely to commit atrocities like those at Abu Ghraib,” Michele Chang claims White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs stated in a classified memo. “We expect a lot of flak over this. But those that would be most against it are those looking either for attention or control.”
Again, there is no independent corroboration on the existence of this classified memo. However, the tenor of the alleged memo does not come as a surprise in the wake of previous systematic unconstitutional actions, in particular Bush’s issuance of Executive Order 12919 allowing the president to declare martial law, Executive Order 12656, Executive Order 11921, Executive Order 13074, and a subsequent amendment to EO 12656. Add to these executive orders and others the John W. Warner Defense Authorization Act of 2006, the Military Commissions Act of 2006, and the National Security and Homeland Security Presidential Directive, also known as PDD51, and you have the framework for martial law and a military dictatorship.
Obama’s version of the Wehrmacht oath, if indeed true, would be required not to eliminate the “old harbingers of hate,” but establish fidelity on the part of the military to a bankster imposed dictator, especially after martial law is declared.
-
- Social bookmarks
- Email this article
-
- Print this page
- Share on Twitter
January 30th, 2009 at 1:09 pm
*** Its better to die standing on your feet ,,, than live standing on your knees!!! http://video.google.com/videos.....o+fascism# <<<WATCH this VIDEO to see what YOUR GENERATION is up against!
ruddiger86 Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 3:40 pm
Its actually “Better to die quick, standing on your feet, than to live forever, begging on your knees” at least that is the Lamb of God (metal band, new album WRATH out Feb 24th for the metalheads!) version of it. They have a new song called “Contractor” about Blackwater, its badass.
Sorry for double posting!
lamealias Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 4:41 pm
ACTUALLY its Es mejor morir de pie que vivir de rodillas. which translates to It is better to die on your feet, than to live on your knees. It was first said by Emiliano Zapata, an early Mexican revolutionary who was around long before Lamb Of God, or even Dolores Ibarruri who is often credited with saying it first.
History is your friend.
Lee Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 4:50 pm
You guys have it backwards:
It is better to live on your feet, than die on your knees.
aaroncalgary Reply:
January 31st, 2009 at 7:00 pm
no, they had it right, Its better to die on your feet than live on your knees.
WW3 Reply:
February 1st, 2009 at 12:58 pm
Get ready for the war!
Over 1000 military manuals on DVD. Get educated:
http://www.thespectergroup.com/militarysales.htm
Joe Reply:
February 2nd, 2009 at 6:01 am
Your an idiot … Dont you read what you write? WTF ? He Is correct Emiliano Zappata said this back in the day of the revolution in Mexico.
Es mejor morir de pie que vivir de rodillas. which translates to It is better to die on your feet, than to live on your knees. 100% CORRECT.
haze Reply:
February 1st, 2009 at 1:53 am
actually one of these Executive Orders given are or were signed by bush but rather clinton and bush sr…………….so hmmm better research next time. Oh and just because he became a president doesnt mean obama is with the bad evil men, i by no means trust the guy but, keep an open mind that he might be alright or even good. To be blind by both love and hate for him is not good, thats what the “evil” man wants you to do be polarized in opinion and thought. Like a child with a bi–polar disease.
haze Reply:
February 1st, 2009 at 1:53 am
thats none not one
ProudPrimate Reply:
February 1st, 2009 at 2:32 pm
A OPEN MIND IS LIKE A OPEN WOUND! DON’T CHEW KNOW THET?
Jason Sieckmann Reply:
February 1st, 2009 at 5:02 pm
I’m pretty sure that it’s: “I love the fishes because they’re so delicious.”
FIGHT Reply:
February 1st, 2009 at 12:57 pm
Obama’s building his own SS! Trust no one and get prepared!!! He is a figure head like the rest, the plans are underway and there is NO change. Start to prepare, before they outlaw all your freedoms.
Over 1000 military manuals on DVD. Get educated:
http://www.thespectergroup.com/militarysales.htm
Jason Sieckmann Reply:
February 1st, 2009 at 5:02 pm
s---! s---!
SEASON 4 OF HEROES IS ON SOON!
kimpunkrock Reply:
February 2nd, 2009 at 3:23 am
Dude turn off your TV.
You are doing exactly what they want you to.
Jason Sieckmann Reply:
February 2nd, 2009 at 1:41 pm
Sylar is making me do it dude, seriously.
smaRTYpants Reply:
February 1st, 2009 at 2:40 pm
lamb of god a satinist jokes
Flat Earth Reply:
February 1st, 2009 at 9:55 pm
Maybe you should ask God for spelling lessons.
Joe Reply:
February 2nd, 2009 at 6:03 am
Maybe you can provide us with his presence ….No? Thought so..Wake Up stupid , Your delusional..Helllloooo!!
RANGER Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 7:29 pm
Bush and his cronies all ready changed the oath.
I know guys who have all ready taken it.
Joe Smith Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 11:54 pm
If you know guys then what was it changed to?
Sources please…
Jason Sieckmann Reply:
February 1st, 2009 at 5:03 pm
How dare you demand proof. Paranoia is good enough.
Joe Reply:
February 2nd, 2009 at 6:05 am
I give you a 10, Perfect !!! Paranoia is good enough.
Graeme Clark Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 9:00 pm
Nimmo should check his sources a bit more thoroughly before posting articles like these… There is literally NO solid source for this information. He`s taking his information off of a blog thats rumoured to be satire and contested even by the author… I`m seriously starting to doubt this man`s journalistic integrity.
Proudhon Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 11:53 pm
I agree, the blog source is without merit. The blog is tagged as Satire and the author states that it was not ready for publication, very sketchy.
lonefrog Reply:
January 31st, 2009 at 1:15 pm
To the both of you, it is always wise to keep abreast with current situations, and to take your own advice.
Another source for you: http://www.blackfive.net/main/.....nging.html
Flat Earth Reply:
February 1st, 2009 at 10:05 pm
That isn’t a source, either.
niko Reply:
February 1st, 2009 at 11:03 pm
I went to the Blackfive site at link provided by lonefrog. This is follows the article…
“My email back to the news exec was that, while I thought it completely false and satirical (all pledges from Demi Moore to President Obama aside), I would look into it. Using a few of the B5 authors’ contacts, we have been able to receive verbal confirmation from sources that this is completely FALSE. We will post official responses from General Cartwright’s office if/when we receive them.
There you have it.
Blackfive.net defends the Obama Administration from slander. Next up, pigs in flight over the ice flows in the gulf of Mexico.
~Blackfive”
I hope Kurt will revise his article accordingly.
elenchus Reply:
January 31st, 2009 at 12:02 pm
I took the old oath when I joined the air force and you must swear to support and defend the US Constitution but it also makes you swear you will obey your superiors. Who is your superior? What is a lawful order? The president is supposed to work for you dumb ass but they do a mind f--- and say anyone they appoint is your superior and is your new master now that you signed on the dotted line. So nothing has changed even if the oath changed and the article lets you know it is not verified by your loving propaganda networks.
Triedbyconscience Reply:
February 1st, 2009 at 5:27 am
The oath specifically is (or was) first to the Constitution, then to the president. That is its order of precedence, and any order in contrary to the constitution (including those enshrined in the UCMJ or presidential order or other regulations) is not a lawful order. The president’s own oath is to faithfully execute the duties of the office of president (which are enshrined within that constitution). The federal government (as defined within the Federalist papers) is the servant, not the master. See the Federalist 27, 44, 57, and 84.
Any power not enumerated, in the original agreement, was never to be a power.
Every act of a delegated authority, contrary to the tenor of the commission under which it is exercised, is void. No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the Constitution, can be valid. To deny this, would be to affirm, that the deputy is greater than his principal; that the servant is above his master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people themselves; that men acting by virtue of powers, may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid. (Alexander Hamilton, Federalist 75)
Potestas stricte interpretatur. A power is strictly interpreted.
In dubiis, non praesumitur pro potentia. In cases of doubt, the presumption is not in favor of a power.
elenchus Reply:
February 1st, 2009 at 12:30 pm
Well, tried by conscience. I was in the military for most of my adult life. I will tell you that I have never seen anyone stand for the US Constitution against an order and not be arrested. As a matter of FACT you are not allowed to discuss the US Constitution in many situations since when performing military service you are considered too stupid to make your own righteous calls. They will murder brown people without a Constitutional declaration of war from congress and for no good reason and give themselves a big HOO HA if a few innocent women and children get killed. The war was based on outright lies not bad intelligence. Congress will not even stand against this tyranny. I respect people like Mr. New who refused the UN uniform but he was attacked. So if you’re so sure your master will grant you Constitutional privileges based on your sound argument than hand in your guns slave.
ProudPrimate Reply:
February 1st, 2009 at 2:28 pm
Elenchus — your name is “a disgrace”! (LOL)
Notwithstanding, everything you say is true.
But TriedByConscience is also telling the truth.
He’s stating the law, you’re stating the enforcement.
And who’s to blame? The people are to blame, because they don’t demand justice and righteousness.
But if we show them, clearly, and the wind is just right, which is now coming to be the case, I ween, they will. But it will take a Herculean effort on our part.
This is the organizational phase. We won’t get a lot of chances, so every shot we take better be a good one, and based on wise counsel.
Triedbyconscience Reply:
February 1st, 2009 at 7:04 pm
By necessity, turning in your guns would be foolhardy. The purpose behind the second amendment was also enumerated in those laws. The federalist 27 explicitly states that with an expanding military that is escaping the civil control, the powers of the people that were placed in the hands of the government must return to the hands of the people. There was to be an end to all delegated powers.
The only end to those powers, however, comes by the power of the people to effectively resist.
In the words of Jefferson:
“The Constitution of most of our states (and of the United States) assert that all power is inherent in the people; that they may exercise it by themselves; that it is their right and duty to be at all times armed and that they are entitled to freedom of person, freedom of religion, freedom of property, and freedom of press.”
– Thomas Jefferson
“[I]f the king ceases to govern the kingdom, and begins to act as a tyrant, to destroy justice, to overthrow peace, and to break his faith, the man who has taken the oath is free from it, and the people are entitled to depose the king and to set up another, inasmuch as he has broken the principle upon which their mutual obligation depended.”
— Manegold
“[I]t is not only permitted, but it is also equitable and just to slay tyrants. For he who receives the sword deserves to perish by the sword.
“But ‘receives’ is to be understood to pertain to he who has rashly usurped that which is not his, now he who receives what he uses from the power of God. He who receives power from God serves the laws and is the slave of justice and right. He who usurps power suppresses justice and places the laws beneath his will. Therefore, justice is deservedly armed against those who disarm the law, and the public power treats harshly those who endeavour to put aside the public hand. And, although there are many forms of high treason, none is of them is so serious as that which is executed against the body of justice itself. Tyranny is, therefore, not only a public crime, but if this can happen, it is more than public. For if all prosecutors may be allowed in the case of high treason, how much more are they allowed when there is oppression of laws which should themselves command emperors? Surely no one will avenge a public enemy, and whoever does not prosecute him transgresses against himself and against the whole body of the earthly republic.”
– John of Salsisbury, Policratus
Jason Sieckmann Reply:
February 1st, 2009 at 5:04 pm
SICK BURN. You’re exactly right.
Unknown Reply:
January 31st, 2009 at 10:25 pm
All hail the new emperor Obama! Everyone must now have a portrait of him in your homes, on every wall, and nothing else.
haze Reply:
February 1st, 2009 at 1:48 am
“previous systematic unconstitutional actions, in particular Bush’s issuance of Executive Order 12919 allowing the president to declare martial law,”
Executive Order 12919 is an order signed by William J Clinton on june 4 1994 so this web site needs to filter its propaganda better not to say that I dont believe NWO or elitist jazz just, sloppy is all
elenchus Reply:
February 1st, 2009 at 1:38 pm
Hi haze,
Bush resigned the emergency act over and over and the new scumbag assumed all power, responsibility, and relinquished nothing. You can delegate authority but not responsibility. When you are arguing with your captors about whose fault it is then make it a good one but short because they probably won’t give you much time. They will be more interested in molesting you. They probably won’t speak English anyhow.
ProudPrimate Reply:
February 1st, 2009 at 2:41 pm
Whatever else may be said in this thread, the new software is awesome, and seems to have solved all the “censorship” problems, which Alex said all along were glitches, not manipulation.
This software seems to be utterly flawless, and quick as a mousetrap. Not once has it “censored” me, or even made me wait, as HuffPo’s does, though I expected it to.
My apologies, team, for doubting you, and congratulations on the new engine (I’ll bet it costs more money though, eh?)
On the subject of this article — hey, everybody makes mistakes.
Let’s learn from it and go back to doing what Alex and we do best: bringing facts to bear and exposing real, provable malfeasance and mischief on the part of the Deep State, of which there is already proven enough to fill a new Britannica.
Evan Reply:
February 2nd, 2009 at 8:05 am
Do you think he and Robberts messed it up on purpose so that when the lawsuit about him not being a U.S. Citizen and therefore ineligible for the office, the court can technicality throw out the lawsuit? Of course he will then be exposed as a fraudulent President, but Congress would never impeach him, and the courts will have no recourse either.
January 30th, 2009 at 1:12 pm
SHOW ME YOUR PAPERS!!! I MEAN MAY I PLEASE SEE SOME I.D
Outrage Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 1:48 pm
You were right the first time. SHOW ME YOUR PAPERS!!! NOW!!! OH, You have “forgotten” your papers. WELL I REMEMBERED MY JACKBOOTS, NOW YOU GET TO TASTE THEM!
I love the smell of cowarding sheeple in the morning, it smells like….FASCISM!
January 30th, 2009 at 1:24 pm
Hail Obama!
January 30th, 2009 at 1:25 pm
Please tell me that On the following day, Obama retook the oath in the privacy of the White House, sans not only the presence of television cameras, but a bible as well.
^^^
Is this a typo? it doesnt make any sense and I dont think SANS is a WORD!!
Michael Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 1:40 pm
Steve,
Sans is a word, it means “without”
Steve Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 1:53 pm
Okay I thought thats what it meant at first. Thanks for the clarification.
lamealias Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 4:50 pm
well you’re partially correct. Sans is French for without. It is a word, just not an English one.
Tren Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 1:48 pm
Maybe you should go back to school – high school that is. Yes, it is an actual word, it does fit, and a simple Google search would have showed you this. I’ll help you out – Google ’sans definition’.
But irrespective of this single word placement: Nimmo is addressing yet another possible move toward dictatorial power within the executive branch and all you want to do is address grammar!?
education is important Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 4:07 pm
showed is not the proper past tense (proper) of show, rather, you should have typed shown.
I would always go through my entries when suggesting someone look something up especially spelling or tense related.
FYI
And as you so eliquently typed in err, Nimmo is actually reporting on the blog entry, a satirical blog entry.
This is not based in fact but not outside the realms of reality, as shown in the responses.
It could be in the works but if you follow the link and read, a key word above the article reads, satire-
FYI
HumanD Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 4:33 pm
I think you mean ‘eloquently’.
Mr. Bill Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 4:40 pm
You guys are cracking me up. Does it make you feel better about yourself to point out the mistakes of others? Is that the purpose of posting such silly retorts to each other?
Matt Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 7:35 pm
I think you mean – “Such silly retortiationastics”. Don’t worry about the jackasses Mr. Bill – SANS a logical argument, they attack grammar. Why? Who the hell knows. Arguing on the internet is like competing in the special olympics. Even if you win, you’re still retarded.
Tren Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 9:20 pm
Wow….you point out a grammatical error and then butcher the rest of your comment.
Also, your logic is absolutely pathetic. I was pointing out that one should NOT make attacks based on single words or GRAMMAR when an article is addressing a potentially important topic. Now back to the whiskey bottle and/or unemployement line.
elenchus Reply:
January 31st, 2009 at 1:29 pm
“Hey fool” BY MR. T, who don’t think grammar and words are important. They are: if you are ever in court the piece of s--- judge will tell you that ignorance is no excuse when they put you in the FEMA camp for misunderstanding your master’s wishes.
nobleUK Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 1:48 pm
im not a 100% sure i think it means ‘without’ in sans-serif In typography, a sans-serif or sans serif typeface is one that does not have the small features called “serifs” at the end of strokes.
Graeme Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 1:52 pm
Yes sans is a word.
You learn something new everyday, or someone teaches you. Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 2:28 pm
Heil Obama! NOT.
FYI, Heil is a German world. lol.
ProudPrimate Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 8:01 pm
sans is French for “without”, from Latin sine which is actually si ne, “if not”. The word has been used as English since ‘way back. Shakespeare’s “Seven Ages of Man” ends this way:
Joe Smith Reply:
January 31st, 2009 at 12:00 am
My work here is done.
January 30th, 2009 at 1:25 pm
I’d love to get confirmation on this report…miss Chang seems credible. The globalist elitists have been doing everything in their power to marginalize and, ultimately, invalidate the American Constitution (and other founding documents). But it wouldn’t surprise me, if true. *Obongo* is one arrogant cuss..most mainstream media photos I’ve seen of him portray him with his chin high, with that tyrant’s sneer on his face, and those beady, *every-one-of-you-is-a-criminal* eyes glaring at us. I’m on ‘high alert’! Semper Fi, Chris in Colorado
David Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 4:32 pm
It is tagged as “Satire” so I’m thinking this is not a serious piece.
sharpsteve Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 5:25 pm
Yes it is tagged Satire and should not be spread around a truth. This is sloppy fact checking. We have enough evidence without publishing this kind of crap.
Griz Reply:
January 31st, 2009 at 10:20 am
Webster’s Online definition of satire:
1 : a literary work holding up human vices and follies to ridicule or scorn
2 : trenchant wit, irony, or sarcasm used to expose and discredit vice or folly
I think that this “satire” applies mainly as a description of the title, not what follies and vices are being disclosed. It’s worth checking, but everything is. Besides, if one didn’t claim satire on a title like “Obama’s Hitler Oath” I’m pretty sure the article won’t or wouldn’t survive long under the scrutiny of the Obamessiah followers. I’ve heard from real people that should know better that “Obama’s going to bring us back to the Constitution”. Hardly something I’d believe at all, ever. But, apparently it came out in some main stream media. Watching sources is admirable, denying sources because of a “feeling” is silly.
ProudPrimate Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 8:15 pm
Aww — do we have to wait for confirmation?
Can’t we burn him in effigy right now? I brought marshmallows . . .
On a more serious note, “how does Michele Chang have access to classified memos?”, I asked myself. So I went to the site Nimble Nimmo is quoting.
Here is what I found:
hmmm . . . .
LollyGag Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 9:38 pm
Must be one of those individuals whom believes that carbon dating
is flawless cause I was wondering if ya could get an ape to
say at least half an understandable sentence.
P.S. Have you ever seen or felt one of those “Ancient ” skulls?
Its called rapid prototyping with old bone…hahahaha…
ProudPrimate Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 11:04 pm
typical desperation salad language — you are fighting a wild raging battle with a strawman: no doubt you will come back with more of the same <sigh!>
ProudPrimate Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 11:14 pm
By the way, have you ever seen the videos (I think they were in the Nature TV series on PBS) of The Signing of Washoe, a chimpanzee, or the remarkable abilities of Koko the gorilla? Neither of them have vocal organs suitable for speech, of course, but their brains are quite capable of language — about like a 3 or 4-year-old human child. They use Amsilan or various computerized symbol selection. Bonobos are even more facile at it.
Oh, and “whom” is objective case — it can’t be the subject of a verb.
Now, go back to sleep and dream your mythology.
January 30th, 2009 at 1:34 pm
Strange in the book called the Bible God states not to swear any oaths by his name.
Red dawn now Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 1:56 pm
Well, he’s safe, cause “god” ain’t His name, and sin that obama, AKA barry soetoro and most of the congress and the rest swear to the wicked one, jabulon,ba;al, satan whatever, this is not fictitious, when they speak of “god” that word being synonymous with sun god worship of the Greek zeus etc.,
If they believed in and were loyal to the real Elohim, YahVeh that inspired the bible, they would not risk perdition doing the trash they are doing.
Joe Reply:
February 2nd, 2009 at 6:10 am
Satin not real you delusional Ape, grow a clue ,Its NOT REAL !!!!
Joe Reply:
February 2nd, 2009 at 6:13 am
Satan * Is Made UP , Just like the rest of the bulls--- Religion has made up to frighten people thru history making easyer to control..All you Bible thumpers are as dumb as rocks…Can You say, DELUSION, MADNESS, Imaginary FRIENDS !!! GROW UP, and Stick Jesus up your ass,,
vengeance Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 4:08 pm
great name robin! ha ha
January 30th, 2009 at 1:37 pm
“sans” is indeed a word, French for “no” or “without”
Steve Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 1:54 pm
Thanks!
kimpunkrock Reply:
February 2nd, 2009 at 3:27 am
I think i know you sweet transvestite.
January 30th, 2009 at 1:40 pm
How dumb is this article? It even includes an absurd paragraph about the non-issue of the “flub” of the swearing in.Why on earth is the estimable Mr.Nimmo allowing this trifling and nonsensical conjecture to be printed with his byline?
West of the Rockies Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 1:59 pm
Words and sequences of words have meaning. Chief Justice Roberts could easily have said “let’s take this again from the top”. But, Roberts did not and things happened differently.
It seems that we will be in for a lot of things happening “differently”.
ProudPrimate Reply:
January 31st, 2009 at 3:51 pm
I saw the video of the oath, and it was obvious to me that Roberts was impatient with Obama, demanding, and impertinent. He was rushing him from the start like a defender on a basketball court, trying to wrong-foot him. “So help you God?” had a very big question mark attached to it, unlike the traditional level reading of what is after all merely a prompt, as if the CJ had serious doubts about Obama’s honesty.
I (rightly or wrongly) took the stumble to be a result of this — what can only be called extreme sour and bitter grapes. I sincerely hope Roberts is right in saying under his breath, “curses! foiled again!” by this landslide election, which gives Congress the chance to reverse some very bad 5-4 decisions, as with this week’s Lilly Ledbetter statute, which Alito wrote the majority opinion, in furtherance of the Federalist Society objectives.
Have you noticed that every member of that occasional majority is Roman Catholic? Is that a coincidence? Statistically significant, at the very least.
You learn something new everyday, or someone teaches you. Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 2:31 pm
Conjecture is the basis for most of the fear-mongering on this site. Rarely are there links to flimsy claims such as “POTUS Bush left the speech to answer Ohlmert”. If anyone is paying attention, PCR said that and had no proof. The proof is in the pudding. The puddin’ heads around here were floatin’ the notion that Bush was going to declare martial law and there would be a Bush dictatorship. Fear, yes. Trust, no.
Rusty S. Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 3:44 pm
The way things are done have connotations and meanings to them.
By “messing up” the original oath, it makes it almost null and void…and since the media made a spectacle of this, it isnt like the accident went unnoticed.
So you have a president who’s religion has been called into question, giving an unofficial oath with the Bible in front of a million people
aaroncalgary Reply:
January 31st, 2009 at 7:03 pm
what a total non-story. Maybe Jesus will save you then.
education is important Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 4:09 pm
Marshall law not martial arts
ProudPrimate Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 8:27 pm
So you think “Marshall Law” is Cardinal Law’s brother? “Marshall” is a noun of title. “Martial” is an English adjective making reference to Mars (genitive “Martis”), Roman god of war. Marshall came into English, thru French maréchal, from “martialis”, the Latin adjective relating to Mars.
Main Entry:
martial law
Function:
noun
Date:
1933
1 : the law applied in occupied territory by the military authority of the occupying power 2 : the law administered by military forces that is invoked by a government in an emergency when the civilian law enforcement agencies are unable to maintain public order and safety
Joe Reply:
February 2nd, 2009 at 6:17 am
Correct !! Ding !
Troll Stomper Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 3:01 pm
It makes no sense because you are a TROLL!!!!
I STOMP YOU!
Joe Smith Reply:
January 31st, 2009 at 12:04 am
Rage all you like ProudPrimate just happens to be correct.
*chuckles and plays the fiddle.*
ProudPrimate Reply:
January 31st, 2009 at 4:04 pm
I didn’t know you played the fiddle, Joe
Joe Smith Reply:
January 31st, 2009 at 8:56 pm
Come on everyone knows the devil plays a fiddle of gold. lol
roaddog Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 7:25 pm
its a cool picture though.
Joe Smith Reply:
January 31st, 2009 at 12:05 am
Couldn’t you just scratch behind his ears?
January 30th, 2009 at 1:53 pm
If you go to the original post, one of the tags for the BLOG this was published under is satire.
This is not for real, but not unrealistic.
You learn something new everyday, or someone teaches you. Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 2:33 pm
Yes, maybe satire. But, the television has been pushing this public address directly from the O man himself. Volunteer, volunteer. It’s kinda spooky.
Julian Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 3:51 pm
This article did say that it needs to be corroberated by other sources before it’s believed. Right now, it’s just a claim.
Chang’s assertion is not corroborated by the corporate media and other news sources.
Matt Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 7:38 pm
I guess that’s really the only reason it’s up here. I was e-mailed this story early this morning and, upon checking it out, figured out easily that it was just some fella posting a blog article. No backup, nothing. Nimmo states that it’s not backed up – So I guess the only purpose is to get people to think that, when they heard this, most of us probably weren’t too surprised. Pissed, probably a lot were, but not too surprised. If that’s not a sad commentary I don’t know what is.
January 30th, 2009 at 2:03 pm
If this is true, the soldiers of the US army will pledge an oath not to protect the US constition or the law or protect the American people, but to slavishly follow the orders of Obama no matter how illegal or unconstitutional they might be, even if they are like Hitler’s orders.
That means, a soldier will take an oath that compels him to carry out orders from Obama not matter how contrary to the interests of Americans or how illegal, such as, shoot US ciivlians in cold blood…
If Obama is so concerned about nationalism and racism in the army etc, then the best way of tackling that is by education and institutional reform.
Getting the army to pledge a personal oath of allegiance to him and to abandon its pledge to the constitution is the road to DICTATORSHIP!
The US army should refuse.
January 30th, 2009 at 2:04 pm
I’ve heard rumors of the military oath being changed from loyalty to the Constitution to the President for a couple of years now. This is an issue where the military ought to tell Mr. Obama: “Jam it up your ass, sir”.
How many warning signs does this republic need? An “Obama Youth” corps, a [paramilitary?] “civilian security force”, a messanic cult movement [real live brain dead zombies awaiting the call of the master], a well armed, mobile, military “Praetorian Guard” over 24,000 strong. Now let’s let him “alter” the military oath to suit his needs. This is in addition to the loyalty oath [over & above the oath to the Constitution] for those involved in “Homeland Security”.
I took an oath to the Constitution, I’ve NEVER renounced it. Read & memorize the Second Amendment. Live by it. MOLON LABE!
January 30th, 2009 at 2:05 pm
What’s next from you jokers,Obama’s not a citizen? The Holocaust is a giant hoax? Nobody landed on the moon? If there is a textbook on “How to Marginalize Dissent”and render an organization hapless and feckless this kind of claptrap would cover the whole first chapter.Is it possible that the Illuminati have gotten to Alex Jones and his staff with a large suitcase of money or the promise of a plum job in the major media? How else to explain garbage like this and the mind boggling insistence on continuing to claim that Larry Silverstein accidentally confessed to blowing up Building #7 in cahoots with the FDNY.Perhaps the whole crew over in Austin,Texas needs to repair to Amsterdam for a few days of large joints and freshly brewed Heinekins.The dollar’s up,you know!
roaddog Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 7:28 pm
pretty much yeah to your first three questions.
Mook Stupekowski Reply:
January 31st, 2009 at 3:49 pm
Hey Roadkilldog,you are exactly the reason that the 9/11truth movement has been assigned to the dustbin of trendy nonsense,populated by blowhard know nothings who actually think they will change peoples minds by being obstinate,irrational and stoned all the time.You are proof that there is such a thing as a “conspiracist mind set” that falls for even the most outlandish and retarded suggestions.Anyone who considers for more than a few seconds the idea that the Moon landing was faked is seriously lacking in critical thinking skills.I’ll put it this way:is the whole space program over the last 50 years a great big lie? As far as the Holocaust of the European Jews during the middle of the Twentieth Century,that is so far beyond dispute it’s ridiculous.Even at your local library in Methville Township there will undoubtedly be oodles of texts that can start you on your way to edification.Oh yeah,what do you think about Larry ‘fessin up to blowing up the buildings? I’d love to hear you repeat verbatim all the nonsense you heard about that one! As they said in “Planet of the Apes”: “Human see,human do”. Hahahahahaha!!
ProudPrimate Reply:
February 1st, 2009 at 10:55 am
do you equally reject the examples of Operation Northwoods, Operation Gladio, the USS Liberty, Gulf of Tonkin, and the Lusitania?
How about MKULTRA as revealed in the Church Committee hearings? How about IBM’s central role in The Final Solution. These are things that can’t be denied.
And what if this report, that has every appearance of an accurate defensible one, is true?
Mook Stupekowski Reply:
February 1st, 2009 at 4:12 pm
You,Sir, are as dumb as a box of rocks.Do yourself a favor and hit the search bar at this site and punch in “LargeWillie”.He decimated a guy named Bob in Colorado last summer on this exact topic.I don’t have time right now.You see,I’m due back on the Planet Earth.let me know if you were able to call that up.If not I’ll take the time to bring you up to the Fifth Grade level in basic World history,dumbass!!
January 30th, 2009 at 2:06 pm
wtf? i am so f---ing sick of speculation, and ifs or maybes. hey alex, when you get some hard evidence of something, i’ll come back to your site. but, enough of this unsubstantiated bulls---. and all of your retard, f---ing sheep that just repeat everything you say. talk about brainwashing, again WHAT THE f---?
You learn something new everyday, or someone teaches you. Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 2:36 pm
Conjecture is the basis for most of the fear-mongering on this site. Rarely are there links to flimsy claims such as “POTUS Bush left the speech to answer Ohlmert”. If anyone is paying attention, PCR said that and had no proof. The proof is in the pudding. The puddin’ heads around here were floatin’ the notion that Bush was going to declare martial law and there would be a Bush dictatorship. Fear, yes. Trust, no.
VivaHST Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 6:36 pm
Dear You learn something new everyday, or someone teaches you.,
Where does one go to apply for a government job posting disinfo on the web? Did you find the job listing on Craigslist? Maybe you already worked in the government and were simply offered the job after showing McCain how to log on to the internets.
Do you get paid by the post? If so I hope they dock your pay because if my tax dollars are going to pay for some cointel lackey you could at least write a new post each time. You may be trying to sell the same old bs, but at least package it differently. You have posted the same thing at least twice on this talkback and once on the Carter 9/11 investigation one. Copied and pasted lies.
In short, TROLL!
Matt Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 7:40 pm
Oh s---! They taught McShame how to use the Intertubes! Oh, we’re all really f---ed now. God help us if they ever show Pelosi how to use it – she’s likely to spread ugly all over the place.
ProudPrimate Reply:
February 1st, 2009 at 10:42 am
it seems to me that the unsubstantiated Ohlmert reference is a real issue, and posting it in two places both of which are relevant cannot be called spam.
It is more relevant here than the other. Perhaps “Something New” felt this higher relevance outweighed the negative aspect of the repetition.
Nothing we do here is as important as protecting ourselves from becoming liars like them we oppose, even by accident.
Do you disagree with that last sentence?
Troll Stomper Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 3:03 pm
TROLL!!!
Joe Smith Reply:
January 31st, 2009 at 12:06 am
Rage baby! RAGE!
Julian Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 3:48 pm
Snizz, you said you come to this site implying you were a fan, but then you start calling him a retard and calling us sheep. I know your a shill. Snizz, eat my f---ing ass.
We are not retard f---ing sheep as you say, if we were, we would be looking at fox news and some celebrity instead. Your language suggests you really hate us and Alex Jones, you dispise us, you want us getting executed in a FEMA camp, you would really enjoy seeing that wouldn’t you?
Well Snizz, you will be called a collaborator and a traitor in the future, you piece of s--- scum filth that you are.
roaddog Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 7:31 pm
you get ‘em girl.
LollyGag Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 9:22 pm
I bring Peace with help in the Creator.
May he bless those in truth and may his SPIRIT guide those
whom seek death and corruption.
May those negative individuals understand that – is red and downfall; + is blue and free.
Birds fly and “Fire” ants crawl.
Birds simply swoop, feed, and take off to seek the low, the easy (way out), but remain strong.
ProudPrimate Reply:
January 31st, 2009 at 4:08 pm
“… an’ the red bird sings
I’ll be blue, ’cause you don’t want my love.”
January 30th, 2009 at 2:06 pm
Some of the things obama is doing kinda could appear as if he was getting ready to battle the COUP.
A civillian force to match the military force we no longer control that the bankers influence now.
Either its all for us, or he knows there is a coup under way and is preparing to battle that.
Otherwise, Ive been while Alex for several years and are preparing for martial law, cuz something is going down and it seems sooner than later.
January 30th, 2009 at 2:08 pm
Dis here my new oath. So lissen up sucka’s! “I pledge to do exactly what Mistuh Obama say no matta’ how mutha’ f---in’ illegal dem orders may be. I pledge to kill cracka’s wid extreme prejudice . I pledge ta’ protect da’ prez’s Cheetohs supply at all cost. And most impot-antly, I pledge to buy as much Obama merchandise as my broke ass can a-fode.” Das it. See yo broke, pasty white cracka’ asses in da’ FEMA camps. Hope an’ change mutha’ f---a’s!!
pat Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 3:01 pm
nice, i was checking out the obama trading cards that are selling for 1.99 a pack, couldn’t afford it after buying the boss a pack of newports.
Julian Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 3:53 pm
I seen you posting that s--- on the Alex Jones channel on Youtube. Your trying to get people to be racist towards you, your an agent provoceteur. f--- off.
roaddog Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 7:32 pm
I took it for granted that julian is a girls name. Sorry if I got it wrong. I got to looking at it and it could be either.Peace.
VivaHST Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 6:42 pm
Racist troll spewing hate from the bowels of Langley, VA, most like. I see through your cheap little game.
ProudPrimate Reply:
January 31st, 2009 at 4:12 pm
the gamma rays that burst from stellar material being sucked into a black hole at near the speed of light could hardly sing a more tragic swan song than this — the sound of one utterly defeated champion of “the old ways”
Still hanging onto your Confederate money?
Call me Da' Prez Reply:
January 31st, 2009 at 10:28 pm
It’s just satire, dummy. I’m using every stereotype in the book. Confederate money is highly collectible, dips---. Go burn incense to your savior, Obama the Marxist Monkey.
January 30th, 2009 at 2:11 pm
Why on earth did they have Obama take the oath a second time if the original “flub” was a “non-issue”? You seem to be criticizing Kurt Nimmo for simply reporting the facts.
ProudPrimate Reply:
January 31st, 2009 at 4:14 pm
“let sll things be done decently and in order” I Cor 14:40
ProudPrimate Reply:
January 31st, 2009 at 4:15 pm
ooops! “all”, not “sll”
I guess I’d better turn on the desk lamp — it’s getting dark in here
January 30th, 2009 at 2:14 pm
Doesn’t look credible, blog tagged as satire.
http://jumpinginpools.blogspot.....a-not.html
A spokesman for the Vice Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff openly leaking a classified document?
January 30th, 2009 at 2:18 pm
Hitler was a great orator and brought his country together. He promised change. He rose to power out of poverty. He gave many executive orders including mandatory service to the country. Many similarities here. We need to be very careful on how we react to some of his future executive orders Mr. Obama sets forward. Remember we are not sheep, we have a constitution and we should live by it.
January 30th, 2009 at 2:20 pm
This whole oath mishap thing is ludicrous. Theodore Roosevelt did not use a Bible when taking the oath of presidential office, Nixon swore on two Bibles, John Adams swore on a book of law, Taft flubbed the oath, the Bible was dropped during FDR’s oath, and the Constitution doesn’t specify whether it is an oath or an affirmation (the difference being the words “So help me God” = oath, omission=affirmation) Hoover did not use the words “So help me God.” The whole thing is sketchy and unclarified throughout history, so to get hung up on simple phrasing by this President, when nearly all presidents have done it in their own manner, is simple nitpicking. As far as the article goes, why bother writing an article and declaring that “there is no corroboration” of the “alleged” memo? You haven’t a basis in fact on this article, so why are you submitting it to us? I expect more from us here, you’re giving ME easy fodder to pick apart and I’m generally on your side, imagine what you’re spoon-feeding your opponents. Professionalism please. Step it up a notch, we’re already deemed kooks and nutjobs, you don’t need to actively submit to these labels by letting your care run slack and your reporting go slovenly.
Midwest Patriot Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 2:30 pm
Marik…well stated. Even Freud said that a cigar is sometimes just a cigar.
High Plains Drifter Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 6:58 pm
..and sometimes it’s something *else* (just ask Monica Lewinski) Hooo-ah! Semper Fi, Chris in Colorado
ProudPrimate Reply:
January 31st, 2009 at 4:19 pm
“a woman is only a woman, but a good cigar is a smoke!” — Kipling
Troll Stomper Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 3:03 pm
TROLLORAMA!!!
Joe Smith Reply:
January 31st, 2009 at 12:09 am
RAgeee ah to hell with it… You are no fun anymore. NEXT.
ProudPrimate Reply:
January 31st, 2009 at 5:04 pm
Joe — did the comment I posted at your blog about your Dean’s List of Global Warming skeptics ever get to you? It was accepted, or so it said.
I can’t find a trace of it over there.
Joe Smith Reply:
January 31st, 2009 at 9:04 pm
It must have gotten eaten by the machine. Technology is your friend until it tries to kill you or does your taxes.
January 30th, 2009 at 2:22 pm
Sans is a word — it means without.
Michael Hoffman, quoted in the article, is a known Holocaust denier. Why is he cited in an article that talks about Hitler? If they were legit, they’d get a Hitler scholar. Kershaw, Browning, Aly, Overy, or someone. Not an obscure Holocaust denier.
January 30th, 2009 at 2:27 pm
repent.unite.resist.
Mr. Bill Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 4:49 pm
Enough with you already – we get your slogan. Buy an ad. Geez…
Joe Smith Reply:
January 31st, 2009 at 12:11 am
War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, and Ignorance is Strength.
War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, and Ignorance is Strength.
War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, and Ignorance is Strength.
War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, and Ignorance is Strength.
War is Peace, Freedom is Slavery, and Ignorance is Strength.
apropos Reply:
January 31st, 2009 at 9:57 am
Baaa I aggrreeeeee, Obaaaaaamaaaaa!!!!!!!!
January 30th, 2009 at 2:33 pm
This is like Oreilly reporting on Kennedy cheating with some guy. If its just hear say then leave it on the back burner.
January 30th, 2009 at 2:36 pm
This piece is a bit inaccurate. It was acutally Donald Rumsfeld in 2003 that changed the military oath from the US Consitution to the President. This is nothing new. Not take take away the danger of the oath from the Constitution to the President but it simply means that Obama is continuing the practice. Exective Orders are the same as House and Senate Resolutions. The President can exact policy without the consent of Congress. By the same token, the Congress can pass resolutions without the signature of the President. It’s called Checks and Balances. Executive Orders can be used to for good or for ill. For example, President Truman desegregated the US Military through an Exectuive Order. Then you have the heinous Executive Orders issued by Bush.
Executive Orders are not new. They have been used by every President since FDR. They are neither allowed nor disallowed by the Constitution. If people are very concerned then a class action lawsuit should be filed to Federal Court and have the courts examine the legality of Executive Orders or not.
Madison's Posterity Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 3:28 pm
“They are neither allowed nor disallowed by the Constitution.”
Doesn’t this mean they are not allowed since these powers are not specifically defined? Correct me if I’m wrong, but if the president (or congress for that matter) is not specifically given the power to do this, doesn’t that make it illegal?
Mr. Bill Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 4:50 pm
That’s correct.
January 30th, 2009 at 2:38 pm
ZEIG HEIL!!!!! HEIL OBAMA!!! WE f---ING DID IT!!!!! CHANGE!!!!!!!!!
TheGhost Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 2:39 pm
CCCCCCCCHHHHHHHHHAAAAAAAAAAAAANNNNNNNNNNNNNGGGGGGGGGGGGEEEEEEEEEEEEEE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
ProudPrimate Reply:
January 31st, 2009 at 4:35 pm
from the Bushies — that Obama hasn’t had time to correct.
Be patient, children. Have a carrot to stay your stomachs.
January 30th, 2009 at 2:47 pm
The governments only source of power comes from our obedience, and now bombs and blind followers i suppose. beyond that though the masses are responsible for their submission to the governments rule. personally i don’t see how a system that is currently making public it’s own shortcomings will retain its followers when some serious s--- hits the fan. look around you and see how many people are coming to their awakening. think about all the magical things that would be possible if we weren’t so damn disconnected from the source of existence. THE SUPERNATURAL AGAIN BECOMES THE NATURAL and all we ever had to do was lift the prefix. THE TRUTH IS RIGHT IN OUR FACES IN ITS ENTIRETY, OUR MINDS OUR THE SCULPTORS OF THEIR OWN REALITY, THIS IS HOW GOD WANTED IT.
January 30th, 2009 at 3:04 pm
Sick of this site just posting up any old story. Anyone think it might be a good idea to say if it is real or satirical? Is it just incompetence or disinformation?
January 30th, 2009 at 3:12 pm
I’m getting pretty sick of these ignorant attacks on Obama. Right now Alex has some idiot filling in for him who says that Obama saying he wants to get us off total dependence on foreign oil means that he plans on destroying our standard of living as “that’s the only thing he could mean.”
What a moron.
Obama means moving the USA towards new means of producing energy OTHER THAN the typical pumping of oil and refining of gasoline. We’ve had the tech for years and have been prevented time and again from putting it into practice.
Alex’ show has turned into an Obama hate-fest that offers up twisted lies as “facts” from people like child molester Corsey. Stop the stupidity and use your brain. You’ll get nothing done by whining and fear-mongering all day.
nutball88 Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 10:17 pm
obama might do something good but he’s still alive, and what that tells me is he has not showed the leaders any sign of such.
Observer Reply:
January 31st, 2009 at 3:54 am
Obama has already committed war crimes in pakistan, and is going to further fund Israel.
He is surrounded by all the old warhawks, that HE hired. The CFR connection. I could go on……
But this is it, if we are to give him a chance to make change, then why already is he towing the exact same line that the people before him did?
He is a Uncle Tom, a House Negro for the elite, that is all.
ProudPrimate Reply:
January 31st, 2009 at 4:46 pm
It all started with the spluttering interview of Peter Joseph, creator of Zeitgeist
Things began to show a different tone after that point.
Corsi and his Swiftboating is a path I’m not ready to walk down, with all due respect.
Alex tried to resist the tide, but old Tarpley really layed it down. Tarpley, someone I greatly admire, has been known to go off the deep end before, most notably in his vitriolic denunciation of some great ladies after the August 07 march to Kennebunkport (which I attended). Wikipedia says:
No attack, by the way, in case you hadn’t noticed. Lots of new books, though.
Now to be even handed about this, it still remains that Operation Gladio, the Norman Dodd interview, Northwoods, the USS Liberty, the Lusitania, War is a Racket, all that stuff is rock solid.
But one needs to be careful getting to far out on the diving board when it comes to events that haven’t yet materialized.
Not complacent, but just — hedge your bets.
January 30th, 2009 at 3:26 pm
For those wondering who else will no doubt swear an oath directly to Obama, Blackwater thugs are expected back from Iraq in May, just in time for a “summer surprise”…
January 30th, 2009 at 3:29 pm
Gibbs’ suggestion that to redirect any oath away from the Constitution and the people it serves, under the label of making the process less encouraging of atrocities, is pure bovine excrement. Some people, at least, remain unimpressed by the historical results of Third Reich policies, and are even less impressed with the idea of employing them here, as the author well points out. The nagging question is – at what point do we decide, based on both a bizzard of insults to social and national tradition during a time of great uncertainty, and upon the deluge of flagrant, multiple violations of our Constitution, that our capitol is no longer in Washington? The Lakotah Nation has already resolved this question, albeit with the lighter trigger point of long violated treaties, and a more localised tribal identity. Personally, I would prefer to restore our nation, beginning with a public oath on a Bible, or at least a suitable equivalent, but I am only one voice.
January 30th, 2009 at 3:39 pm
Its actually “Better to die quick, standing on your feet, than to live forever, begging on your knees” at least that is the Lamb of God (metal band, new album WRATH out Feb 24th for the metalheads!) version of it. They have a new song called “Contractor” about Blackwater, its badass.
Mr. Bill Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 4:53 pm
Beat it Sony Web Marketer. Lamb Of God is garbage.
January 30th, 2009 at 3:54 pm
the Oath is semantics, when the prior President leaves power, No oath or lack thereof keeps the president elect from assuming the presidency.
January 30th, 2009 at 3:54 pm
what a bunch of nonsense, totally unsubstantiated and, after the past 8 years of total disaster ‘leadership’, really pathetic. More of the exact same deflection of attention away from the neocons and put it on someone else as we’ve had for since sept 11, 2001. Neocons tried to make everyone afraid of terrorists and launched wars and totally wasted the national economy and now the mess they made is so massive…the ‘news’ pundits are all focused on Obama…what a crock of crap.
January 30th, 2009 at 4:02 pm
Um– source?
January 30th, 2009 at 4:32 pm
Free Republic has pulled this article for the reason that it’s a hoax. I cannot corroborate the information either.
ProudPrimate Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 8:35 pm
too late here — the bait has been devoured! (sheesh!)
Joe Smith Reply:
January 31st, 2009 at 12:15 am
What came first the theory or the conspiracy?
January 30th, 2009 at 4:34 pm
next thing you know people will be chanting:
Es ist Zeit für sauberen. Wir müssen die Juden ausrotten.
or some s--- like that south park episode
January 30th, 2009 at 4:34 pm
It is more than likely satire, just like the story that the KKK endorsed Obama. This is not to say not to be vigilant because power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely. That is why we have checks and balances in the 3 branches of federal government. The founding founders were allergic to tyranny.
ProudPrimate Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 8:33 pm
not to mention the confounding founders
Joe Smith Reply:
January 31st, 2009 at 12:16 am
*set and SPIKE*
January 30th, 2009 at 4:35 pm
this is f---ed up. It freaks me out because this is the same acceleration we saw in Australia with a change in government…
January 30th, 2009 at 4:37 pm
Hail to our King,
King Obama,
I wonder how his so called “oath”
will play in the infowar
January 30th, 2009 at 4:53 pm
…. starts to look like a black Hitler…. I thing I see a mustache every time I see the bankster’s puppet … I have an urge to click my boots …
don’t be fooled by the joker’s new off coffee paint job in that filthy white birdcage with a Blackberry…
But I suspects much the wife of being the balls and the black power behind the man … look at her fog God sakes … she’s CFR and scared of no black mous-tache (stain) when wearing blood red.
you’re right Jack; the emperor wears no clothes…..
ProudPrimate Reply:
February 1st, 2009 at 9:03 pm
don’t be set up by a joker satirist — you look silly when the punch line comes
January 30th, 2009 at 5:14 pm
If you follow the link it goes to a blog post and doesn’t source any other news or government publication. The blogpost also has “satire” as one of its tags. I tried to google this story but found nothing official aside from blogposts that copy/pasted the original. Can someone please post a link to something that actually corroborates with this? Otherwise I think Nimmo made a booboo in listing a satirical article as real news.
January 30th, 2009 at 5:28 pm
I’m gay, hahaha.
VivaHST Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 6:49 pm
Great job on contributing to the conversation.
Joe Smith Reply:
January 31st, 2009 at 12:18 am
I am happy for you?
I’m so lost on that comment.
And, ok… lol…
If it is any interest I have been happy too.
Call me Da' Prez Reply:
February 1st, 2009 at 2:11 pm
How much fo’ a mutha’ f---in’ blow job?
Joe Smith Reply:
February 2nd, 2009 at 9:56 am
ewww… Just… ewww…
January 30th, 2009 at 5:49 pm
You all BETTER swear to obama, hes going to change america and he needs your help to do it.
You should be happy to have such a wonderful leader.
January 30th, 2009 at 6:11 pm
the oath story has yet to be corroborated, so don’t fret yet, though anymore nothing would surprise me. Also in the blog where is was posted, the tag says satire and if you read the comments a person claiming to be the author states that the story was never cleared for release, so…… until there is another report about this, i would put to much weight into the problem.
January 30th, 2009 at 7:01 pm
I PLEDGE LOYALTY TO THE CONSTITUTION AND THE REPUBLIC!IF IT DIES SO DO I!!!!!!
January 30th, 2009 at 8:02 pm
I am not an American but I pledge loyalty to the Second Amendment, cause I like to keep it simple.
Pack a gun and pay no taxes.
January 30th, 2009 at 8:08 pm
If someone extorts your signature on a contract to commit a crime, this contract is null and void. It does not have to be invalidated by a court, its own dishonesty invalidates it. Obama’s nazi oath is legally worthless because it’s dishonest; it binds no one. Trash is trash; garbage can’t be the law.
Pack a gun and pay no taxes.
ProudPrimate Reply:
February 1st, 2009 at 9:01 pm
Here’s a highly suggestible reader. More than ready to overlook the “if” hidden in the declaration. And he’s armed
John Galt Reply:
February 2nd, 2009 at 1:03 am
Fraud vitiates everything.
January 30th, 2009 at 8:20 pm
BUCK OFAMA!
ProudPrimate Reply:
February 1st, 2009 at 10:22 am
This comment of yours reminds me of the time when I was 5, I was over in Linda Leach’s yard (also 5) and across the fence was her 4-year-old neighbor. “Pee on your head” said the little neighbor girl. I looked at Linda, who immediately told me, “Jesus’ll kill her. She’ll go to damn!”
January 30th, 2009 at 8:31 pm
This appears to be a joke. The real question is, who is it on? I’ll leave that for you to figure out
lonefrog Reply:
January 31st, 2009 at 1:50 pm
Gee thanx, next you’ll be calling it a privelege to think for myself.
ProudPrimate Reply:
January 31st, 2009 at 3:29 pm
if I did that I would spell it “privilege”
Joe Smith Reply:
January 31st, 2009 at 9:08 pm
I would call it amazing.
ProudPrimate Reply:
February 1st, 2009 at 10:18 am
ie., unlikely?
lonefrog Reply:
February 2nd, 2009 at 10:04 am
privelege….privilege………indeed I stand corrected,
I’m not sure if my point would have came across had I not been graded. Thank you sir. Ironic, how one so easily slides into the role of superiority through the use of sarcasm without even typing anything of substance.
I offer you another test sir,
Remain on this website and continue to grade all posts, maybe then you will be able to break free from the bonds of your handler. I believe when you are free, you will no longer have the desire to slither along on your belly and you will walk somewhat erect like the prowd primate you are.
Joe Smith Reply:
February 2nd, 2009 at 9:58 am
ie., Impossible.
January 30th, 2009 at 8:41 pm
Folks, go read the article if it is still up. IT IS TAGGED as SATIRE! There’s enough that really is wrong with the new administration but this story is totally unsubstantiated and should not be on Infowars. Come on.
January 30th, 2009 at 8:43 pm
Booo!
January 30th, 2009 at 8:49 pm
BLAH, BLAH, BLAH. More paperwork huh ? ooooooooohhhhhhh paperwork. oooooooooo documents !!!
When the F*** are people going to realize that all this mumbo jumbo is a complete waste of time. In the end, we just have to stand up and say no! I refuse to buy into their pathetic, paper shuffling ways.
f--- the constitution, f--- laws, f--- dirty cops, and f--- our founding ( Freemason ) fathers.
We all were born with whats right and wrong. I dont need ANY document or ass hole telling me how to live.
WE ARE MANY THEY ARE FEW.
Devils Advocate Reply:
February 1st, 2009 at 2:15 pm
Amen to that brotha’!
January 30th, 2009 at 9:01 pm
I work with soldiers everyday if this happens I’ll know about! After serving in the Air Force for 26 years I know the mind set of the NCO”s and SNCO’s; they’ll flat refuse tom do this.
January 30th, 2009 at 10:38 pm
i’ll say it adding a couple, “to poop on”’s and fart jokes places through out. i give loyalty to the united states and that mean you and you and you and you, not him or her, who ever they are.
January 30th, 2009 at 10:44 pm
As the title post is obvious, you cattle are and will not be able to anything about it.
January 30th, 2009 at 11:40 pm
I said it before, Velcome to ze Unazi States of Amerika.
January 31st, 2009 at 12:07 am
this is the 6th time INFOWARS has blocked my anti racist biblical responce
January 31st, 2009 at 1:40 am
Obama’s Brave New World – Mine Führer. I can Valk!
http://sxolsout.110mb.com/55.html
January 31st, 2009 at 2:48 am
What a bunch of brain dead idiots.
You are all living proof, why this country is falling apart !
You have all been so bombarded by bulls---, your entire lives, that you don’t even know what you believe in anymore..
Where’s my source ! Read your comments !
The bottom line is, this country is going to hell, and they won’t even have to fire a shot !
Hell, no one has to, your minds, and spirit’s are allready gone !
So, just keep up your stupid ass comments, but please don’t do anything to change YOUR destiny.
Because when it’s done, SOME, with the Will, and Spirit to Survive, will be around to pry that gun from your cold dead fingers, and bring about Real Change. The Truth Is ” Your Allready Dust “!
January 31st, 2009 at 2:49 am
I don’t believe this article one bit. I honestly do not believe that Obama would do that. Now I’ve spent A LOT of time reading this website, though I rarely comment, and I agree with the overall philosophy and purpose. But I think it can often become ridiculous.
“The President feels that the military has been too indoctrinated by the old harbingers of hate: nationalism, racism, and classism. By removing an oath to the American society, the soldiers are less likely to commit atrocities like those at Abu Ghraib”
Too unreal. Too fascist. Now, I don’t like Obama, but I don’t think he’s the self-aware fascist that a lot of people make him out to be. He’s an approvement over Bush, and even if he was a fascist he wouldn’t do this. For one thing, requiring the military to swear an oath to the president is too BLATANTLY fascist. It would inevitably work against his EVIL plan (that’s sarcasm) and alert the public.
This story is probably just someone’s crack at a tribute to Orwell and their view of the world.
Infowar fanfic in other words.
January 31st, 2009 at 3:19 am
Jones, how many CNP members do you have on as regulars to your show in a month? How many of them hail that man made Catholic King over at the Vatican? When do you give equal attention to the secret societies who wield powerful controlled opposition to freedoms and knowledge while being manifested on the right side of the false R/L paradigm? The Jesuits can be even more blatantly ham fisted in their arbitration of imposed guidelines and procedures than the CFR and Bilderberg members. What planted infiltrators of the Patriot movement are you aware of who serve as gatekeepers and steam valves for the public’s passive conditioning? Exactly who owns Ted’s network and what various and sundry exploits would that owner be involved with?
January 31st, 2009 at 3:45 am
This clown and his vile man/wife Shaq in our damn white house makes me PUKE!! That place is going to need complete fumigation when they boot their asses out of there!! Not to mention that rotten spawn of theirs.
January 31st, 2009 at 4:43 am
“I swear by God this sacred oath that I shall render unconditional obedience to the President of the United States and Leader of the Liberated, Barack Obama, supreme commander of the armed forces, and that I shall at all times be ready, as a brave soldier, to give my life for this oath.”
“Ich schwöre bei Gott diesen heiligen Eid, daß ich dem Führer des Deutschen Reiches und Volkes Adolf Hitler, dem Oberbefehlshaber der Wehrmacht, unbedingten Gehorsam leisten und als tapferer Soldat bereit sein will, jederzeit für diesen Eid mein Leben einzusetzen.
Replace the satanic inner core of the free cancer masons with a normal one that does not want to bring down the worlds population to 1 billion in a preemptive nuke M A D world war, 3.
http://doctorno.diinoweb.com/f.....tlanta0000
January 31st, 2009 at 5:04 am
The soldiers already take this oath, it’s called chain of command. All of you arguing if this blog is true or not still miss the point. I know the Iraqi children were coming over to America with their scissors ready to cut up our constitution,
Who’s orders did our troops follow there? Sure as hell was not the Constitution.
January 31st, 2009 at 5:08 am
I serve you Obama!
January 31st, 2009 at 5:59 am
why aren’t any of the jew haters in the crowd mentioning the breaking of the cease fire in gaza by hamas? so when israel retaliates you will all be saying it’s their fault! wake up you dumb bastards!
January 31st, 2009 at 8:14 am
No criticism of you meant by this, Kurt; this is an excellent article; but with most of the “American” people, especially military service men and women, not knowing what the Constitution really means, and that it is not simply a formality to swear allegiance to it, as well as not knowing the difference between giving fealty and loyalty to Constitution versus the President, believing giving such loyalty and fealty to the Constitution is one and the same with giving same to the President, notwithstanding that such if DEFINITELY NOT the case, what difference does it make?
Those same “American” people don’t believe that Nazi-like fascism can happen in the U.S. and/or happen today, and know little or nothing, most likely nothing, about the homage of and oath to die for Hitler, so most of them WILL give such homage to the Office of the President, in this case Obama, notwithstanding the racism of most said “Americans” because they want to prove that they’re supposedly not racist; and Obama IS President; so, no matter what their racist feelings, they will believe that completely “honoring” the President no matter what, overrides their racist feelings.
Thus “Heil Obama” will be the rule of the day since most “Americans” so falsely believe that such is the level of “loyalty” required for the Office of President, particularly in this day and age of mass insanity and the levely of the brainwashing of the American people. After all, most of them literally believe that the President is the “Commander-in-Chief” of everyone, not just the military; and, with such ignorance, how can we hope that there will be anything less than blind loyalty to the President, especially when we are being lied to constantly that we are supposedly surrounded by terrorist enemies everywhere?
Anyway, I know you know all of this, Kurt; I am just voicing it here for those who don’t know these things and/or don’t think about them as them should; and, most importantly, that they should keep in mind at all times when confronting the issue of patriotism to this country and its unConstitutional leaders and de facto rulers. I should not need to reiterate that We the People are the ONLY ones who are supposed to run things in this so-called “Constitutional republic”, but we, the U.S. of A., have been long taken over by a Catholic Jesuit, Israeli criminal, neo-Nazi cabal of forces that hate our Constitution and freedoms and will do, and are doing, anything they can to get around it, as they constantly do.
These people who ostensibly run things, want the actual enslavement of us all; and, if we dare question their false “patriotism”, they will have us sent to FEMA internment camps to languish and die in the millions. It is an understatement that we are ALL expendable to these sickos; but we ALL have the God- and Constitutional (via the Declaration of Independence through the Supremecy Clause of said Constitution) to stand up against ALL of these treasonous, traitorous and tyrannical enemies of the Constitution, and to stand up against all of their despotic usurpations of the Constitution and the freedom(s) of us all!
January 31st, 2009 at 9:31 am
We all have God given rights and freedoms as the Declaration and Constitution boldly state. We have to believe and accept that fact whether it is written on crumbling parchment or not. These documents declare and describe an IDEAL system of humane government designed to preserve a representative form of legislative power to rule over a nation blessed with liberties. It’s the greatest governmental blueprint since the Magna Carta. But, in of itself, it’s not the actual bestower of these blessings. That recognition goes to the Creator. I believe He expects us to aggressively and vigilantly defend them come any hellish despotic or collective tyranny on this planet.
And the wonders of technology along with a burgeoning population never will give an elite few oligarchs the rights to own our souls and herd us like cattle for their own selfish purposes. When you realize that this is the ominous force that classically threatens freedom throughout history, the resolve to resist and fight the aggression rises from within and becomes strongly rooted. Ultimately, dead or alive, when it’s all said and done, you have just as many rights and liberties as you decide to give yourself from that great wealth of freedom bestowed by your Creator.
January 31st, 2009 at 10:14 am
well these pages are getting stupid, is it your intent to bore us with info and your very smart brains or do we want to discuss how to get free of this, you see everyone knows whats going on here but nobody has got the answer just alot of rants! I’m still waiting for you people to step this up a notch. WHAT DO WE DO NOW!!
January 31st, 2009 at 10:14 am
Can Anyone Cite the Source for Obama Oath Story?
No. Yet it circulates and is now being posted on Break the Matrix and other blogs and sights I had respect for outside this circle. I guess if enough people post it it must be true ,RIGHT? WRONG. I Stand by my last bulletin on this subject. Please STOP REPOSTING stories as fact if you can not verify them yourself please include a question mark so others will.
Obama Military Oath is DISINFO
Please dont repost information you have not verified for yourself from reliable sources.
There are disinfo agents feeding false stories so you will not recognize the truth when it hits.
They count on you reacting like scared sheep in a herd mentality to cover their tracks.
Identify the original posters and
See if you can figure out who they are.
This is not a game for the weak minded, this is psyops at its best.
Be smart, not popular
Jimmy Reply:
February 1st, 2009 at 3:11 pm
The article clearly states,
“If Obama did indeed instruct the Pentagon to have soldiers and officers pledge a loyalty oath directly to the office of the President”
as so this has not been corroborated as fact. It is just examining the circumstance of “what if”,…
Perhaps, you are the one spreading DISINFO by reading to fast, not comprehending, & then creating your own interpretation of what the article is saying. Obviously those who do not read the entire articles, or better yet, do not understand what was written are the most vulnerable to believing & spreading disinformation.
I has to disagree w/ you here. This article is not spreading any kind of DISINFO, as you call it.
ProudPrimate Reply:
February 1st, 2009 at 8:58 pm
“If Obama did indeed . . .”
A lamer disclaimer.
The bulk of the impact, complete with the incendiary headline and Hitler’s picture, is meant to instill the assumption in those Huxley called “highly suggestible”, who are present in considerable numbers, as you can see. Alex’s special project is due out in the very near, and is advertised as carrying the same message.
Fortunately, happily, surprisingly, the “highly suggestibles” are less than a strong majority.
January 31st, 2009 at 10:38 am
we need a new constitution do your research and stop complaining and call me when we have a new one . our fore fathers did it peacfully so can we
Jimmy Reply:
February 1st, 2009 at 3:45 pm
You are the one who needs to do their research. We don’t need a new Constitution. What we need to do is obey the one we have. That’s exactly what the NWO goonies want, a new one so that they can legally trash the one that protects US “We The People” from “them”, the “tyrants”.
ProudPrimate Reply:
February 1st, 2009 at 8:49 pm
Agreed —
nothing I dread more than a Constitutional Convention.
lonefrog Reply:
February 2nd, 2009 at 10:07 am
google Ralph Epperson
triedbyconscience Reply:
February 2nd, 2009 at 6:46 pm
Indeed. We’ve not been following the constitution since the civil war. When Lincoln created emergency powers for the Congress, allowing the passage of legislation under the ’suspension of rules’ ‘without contention’ due to the lack of quorum without the southern states, he opened Pandora’s box.
Since that time, our congress has passed a great deal of legislation (mostly under the last few administrations) under ’suspension of the rules’ and ‘without objection’. This is not representation, nor is it a constitutional republic at that point.
Further, the failure of the teaching of history, particularly the history of failing constitutional democracies (which the German republic was in 1933), is also troubling.
The patterns occur again and again. At this point, under the last administration, 94% of all bills passed under suspension of the rules, with no vote, and no reading of them, nor any record of who was present when the rules were suspended.
Simply put, according to the rules, even one objection is enough to restore the constitutional process… and Congress itself can pass legislation to restore that process, by passing a resolution changing their rules to negate it, or the Supreme Court could declare it unconstitutional (due to the requirement of a minimum of 51% of the congress present to do any work in the Constitution).
They will not, as it would gut a great deal of power.
January 31st, 2009 at 12:32 pm
It was John Quincy Adams that swore on a book of laws, not his father one of the architects of the Declaration of Independence and 2nd President.
But what I don’t understand is, what does the oath of office flub have to do with changing servicemen’s loyalty oath?
January 31st, 2009 at 12:37 pm
This article on Infowars disturbes me . When this website and Mr Jones are looked at as a credible news source of late . To have Mr. Nimmo put an article as of now unfounded and unverified is not in the best interest of this site . There should be more than one source and verifiable documents to insure the credibility of the information as reported by Mr. Nimmo. This could be disinformation and this site bought it . If it is true as reported by Mr. Nimmo then we as a country have a serious problem to deal with .
January 31st, 2009 at 12:40 pm
The SOURCE; Matthew Avitabile, He’s a 22 year old student in NY.
http://www.blogger.com/profile…..7168218304
Now that you’re at Matt’s Profile, scroll down to “Blogs I Follow”
then click-on the link, “Jumping in Pools”. They think it’s funny that you thought this was real.
BTW, it only took me 10 minutes to figure this out.
ProudPrimate Reply:
February 1st, 2009 at 9:45 am
It’s been pulled — did you think to copy it?
metoo Reply:
February 2nd, 2009 at 2:35 pm
Avitabile’s profile page was not “pulled”.
The link was CENSORED by Jones just as my original comment was.
Here it is again;
http://www.blogger.com/profile.....7168218304
January 31st, 2009 at 12:48 pm
That’s it Mr. eBay bullhorn pimp, I’ve had enough of your hypocritical censorship….WE’RE DONE HERE!!!
Joe Smith Reply:
January 31st, 2009 at 9:10 pm
I would bet they never even got the money.
January 31st, 2009 at 1:11 pm
Maybe this link will work;
http://jumpinginpools.blogspot.....etime.html
ProudPrimate Reply:
February 1st, 2009 at 10:08 am
That’s the one — and I’m saving a copy.
So, what does this say to the hunters of Obama’s head?
To quote Nietzsche:
“Wer mit Ungeheuern kämpft, mag zusehn daß er nicht dabei zum Ungeheuer wird.
Und wenn du lange in einen Abgrund blickst, blickt der Abgrund auch in dich hinein.”
(”Whoever doeth battle with monsters, let him take heed that he doth not thereby become one.
And when thou lookest long in an abyss, th’ abyss is gazing deeply back into thee.”)
January 31st, 2009 at 1:37 pm
“Give Me Liberty or Give Me DEATH” ~+~
George Reply:
February 1st, 2009 at 7:46 pm
‘Give me liberty, or give me more liberty!’
January 31st, 2009 at 1:58 pm
Were probably all fooled. This looks like NWO plan is going on like before
http://www.davidicke.com/obama
Sakka Reply:
January 31st, 2009 at 2:37 pm
Thank god someone ended this nonsense. Thank you sunshine. Now lets get the webmaster to add an update to this page.
ProudPrimate Reply:
January 31st, 2009 at 5:10 pm
When you can post untouched images of the reptoid tail under his coat, I will listen.
I would accept interplanetary ticket stubs, as well.
Joe Smith Reply:
January 31st, 2009 at 11:17 pm
Wait, wait, wait… What am I suppose to do with all the Reese’s Pieces UPC stubs then?? Damn that E.T. and his phone home frequent caller miles.
January 31st, 2009 at 2:40 pm
Jail the criminals that have created the NWO plan:
geocities.com/newageinternational/DepopulationIntro.html
We need to create our own freedom and our own world!
(NESARA INTERNATIONAL otherwise known as the “Reformation Act”)
insights2.org/nesara/index.html
January 31st, 2009 at 2:41 pm
I enjoy kicking around a good topic an having fun with it before I set it free. Although it is painfully clear that this one is not done gettin’ kicked.
For more good kickin’, check this out:
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?f.....geId=87548
January 31st, 2009 at 4:12 pm
Homepage of Nesara:
http://www.nesara.us
Disinformation on these links about Nesara!:
Nesara.com / Nesara.org
January 31st, 2009 at 5:09 pm
I meant to say WRITE a retraction.
January 31st, 2009 at 6:29 pm
I second Matt’s desire for a retraction. The initial Blog does clearly state the Article is Satire.
January 31st, 2009 at 6:48 pm
I feel bad about it, this “nasara” thing is like wasting time.
Any lie make it hard to find the truth.
January 31st, 2009 at 7:16 pm
The American people are not up for another war right now, a genocide maybe.
January 31st, 2009 at 8:25 pm
Kurt Nimmo got burned. Article source article is bad satire (satire is not satire if and when you have to say it is satire).
Me Reply:
January 31st, 2009 at 9:13 pm
Um– the best satire is the type you need verification for. Like, duh
January 31st, 2009 at 8:30 pm
http://jumpinginpools.blogspot.....etime.html
January 31st, 2009 at 8:54 pm
Says satire right on the top. Kurt you’re a moron.
January 31st, 2009 at 8:56 pm
Whatever “Nazi” or “Hitler” names is used for, mindcontrol is also possible, hitler might be one too used by the Secret Government/Ilimunati/alien group for NWO actions.
Maybe an alien was inside the body of hitler, or they just build these / copied from human. Crazy but who knews
January 31st, 2009 at 11:15 pm
Great article Kurt.Keep up the good work!
“Who-WHO will watch The Watchmen”?
OwlMan
Note: Everyone…Learn the “Secrets” of “Secret Societies” by clicking on the link below…
http://awaken.weebly.com/secre.....nings.html
Joe Smith Reply:
January 31st, 2009 at 11:18 pm
I watch the watchmen.
February 1st, 2009 at 1:45 am
make no mistake about it obama is both a
fascist and a demogogue
his dictatorship will be the end
of this nation
February 1st, 2009 at 1:48 am
Why is this article still up? If you go to the source it says at the top “NOTE: This article is, in fact, a satire piece”. I can’t believe infowars would allow someone to post an article based on one persons blog. This isn’t the first time I’ve seen a piece of satire reported as real news on infowars.com.
February 1st, 2009 at 5:14 am
It would make sense to change the oath so it does not defend the constitution but the president instead. This would fit with the agenda. However it’s probably too big a step. It’s likely that this is just a rumour and it would be many years before such a thing could begin to happen. However it would be a good idea to stay frosty on this subject.
February 1st, 2009 at 8:08 am
I think this would be a great idea. Go ahead and pledge to the Presidency.
Then we will know who the traitors are and they will never be able to hold a public service job ever again!
After they are released out of prison they will be registered and not permitted to associate with other known traitors.
February 1st, 2009 at 9:30 am
This is a ridiculous assertion. The Joint Chiefs of Staff will never agree to any dictum to swear an oath to Obama instead of to the Constitution. They would refuse to do so; and there would be a constitutional crisis. Gimme a break. I know the military; believe me, this will never happen.
Now, having said that, I do not doubt stories of FEMA mystery buses training for domestic disturbances, nor do I doubt that Posse Comitatus is dead and that we could have a military patrolling our streets in the event of an economic collapse or a terrorist attack or even a natural disaster. All of those possible scenarios are realistic, given Bush’s administration’s massive failure during Katrina, the probability of an economic collapse, and the huge possibility of another terrorist attack.
But, military officers swearing an oath to Obama instead of swearing to “protect and defend the Constitution of the United States?”
Nah. Gah. Happen.
February 1st, 2009 at 9:53 am
What is with the spelling police here? They have a story about Obahhhma and how he is like Hitler by what he is doing, and the spelling po-po can’t help themselves. They put other people down. This is the internet, not a class for gramer. if you can get your point out, that is good enough for me. I hope putting people down for their mistakes makes you feel better about yourselves, because the rest of us think of you as arrogant ass-Wholes. 100%.
ProudPrimate Reply:
February 1st, 2009 at 1:43 pm
The internet is a great opportunity to improve your skills in this, mankind’s greatest achievement, ie., language.
People should be encouraged, politely, to avail themselves of the wonderful free tools that exist, like Google, and all the resources it provides, especially dictionaries.
For those who want to go even deeper, I recommend the Online Etymology Dictionary”. One doesn’t really own a word until one knows its ancestors and relatives.
But tools are our wealth, and the skills to use them.
As they say in the carpentry business: “measure twice and cut once”.
lonefrog Reply:
February 2nd, 2009 at 10:20 am
Keep up the good work, I see hope in you young padowan.
February 1st, 2009 at 12:35 pm
Here is the current Oath of Enlistment and the additional Oath for Officers. Note the dates of adoption.
Found at: http://www.history.army.mil/faq/oaths.htm
“I, _____, do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.” (Title 10, US Code; Act of 5 May 1960 replacing the wording first adopted in 1789, with amendment effective 5 October 1962).
“I, _____ (SSAN), having been appointed an officer in the Army of the United States, as indicated above in the grade of _____ do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign or domestic, that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I take this obligation freely, without any mental reservations or purpose of evasion; and that I will well and faithfully discharge the duties of the office upon which I am about to enter; So help me God.” (DA Form 71, 1 August 1959, for officers.)
ProudPrimate Reply:
February 1st, 2009 at 1:36 pm
Good work, Westof —
the quote from the Army page is:
“The wordings of the current oath of enlistment and oath for commissioned officers are as follows:”
That should settle the issue.
February 1st, 2009 at 12:37 pm
That’s why I have a section (on my site) called ‘Suspicions’ (I hate the word theory, and the word hate, but in this case, I’ll use it
The constitution is the last thing on everyone’s mind, so how will they notice?
Bing Reply:
February 1st, 2009 at 3:06 pm
http://www.educate-yourself.org/mc
February 1st, 2009 at 12:41 pm
Quoted from the source “This article is, in fact, a satire piece”
What a bunch of dumbasses
February 1st, 2009 at 1:10 pm
NOTE: This article is, in fact, a satire piece.
WHILE I’M ALL FOR HELPING WIN THE INFORMATION WAR, MAYBE YOU CAN LET PEOPLE KNOW THAT MS. CHANG WROTE A SATIRE AND EVEN SAYS SO IN THE VERY BEGINNING OF IT. LITERACY COUNTS, SO DOES COMPREHENSION.
February 1st, 2009 at 4:05 pm
Don’t forget this:
http://educate-yourself.org/mc.....ep08.shtml
February 1st, 2009 at 5:56 pm
all of its a fraud both sides of the argument are equally retarded good luck and God bless all of you peace
February 1st, 2009 at 7:54 pm
Come on guys man, Wake up. you guys argue amongest yourselves and all ur doing is wasting air. I was in the U.S. Military and I took a oath to defend this country againest foriegn and
domestic enemies of the United States. What do you do when you realize that your government
is the enemy. So for all you guys out there. its not jez Demo’s its also the repub’s..buttom line are government has lost its way. they don’t care one lick if your black white asian mexican they jez dont care. its like going to school and asking the lunch lady whats for lunch and we will take it from there. I’m tired of that person blaming that person and that person blaming that person all you guys are doing is talking in circles. thats wat they want this is jez the window dressing. watch what they do on the side. there is so many lobbiest in DC it aint funny, are government is bought and paid for. no matter who wins the office. man i get tired you people blaming that and that over there. bwtn the TV and the media you guys are going in circles. dont beleive nothing research it
research it and research it. buttom line we as a Country are in very Deep trouble, we are going down hill on a wagon with no brakes.
What to do I dont have the slightest idea. But all i hear is me me me me. its not about me. its about us as a people. to think as one and not as want they want, divide and conquer and keep them in groups. all you ex military peeps understand that. Im jez at the end of the rope. I care for this country very much. I put my life on the line for it. and all i hear is no your wrong no your wrong they need a person, outside of government it sit down with them both. and do whats right for the people not Demos or the Repubs. for the people. have we forgotton that we were people from a great nation, yes we have made mistakes on both sides. yes we are not always right. but when your not right what do you do. you sit down and rethink what your doing. not shove it to make people do it. jez because you win the office and your side wins. Im not a O’bama supporter or a repub supporter. I am a People supporter. But they make you choose sides . why do they do that? because they want you guys to keep fighting one another and arguen and so fourth. so you say 56 pct of the people voted for O’bama, but remember 46pct voted againest him. and all you here is that side or that side on the TV or media. for me you ask who I am, I am christian who believes in freedom of religion for anyone. its not us to decided whats right or wrong. But do it together not for the repubs or demos but for the poeple. But I guess had to say this. sorry guys
I jez get so mad. people say this and this but they dont pay attention to the real problem. But I guess Im the only one who sees this and a couple of others. But God Bless you all and remember the people not the side you follow.
James McDonough Reply:
February 1st, 2009 at 9:14 pm
Sage advice Bill, it is the People versus the Corrupted Officials, and the Laws that go against the will of the people. The Secret government has run roughshod over us for sometime, and just as the American Indian knew ” white mans law ” was not worth the paper it was written upon, so must we. The men, and women of the American Jury system MUST reaffirm to the Judges, and the Lawyers that WE JUDGE WHAT IS RIGHT OR WRONG, AND WHAT LAWS ARE ENFORCED, OR WHAT IS NOT. This is are only way out ahead, as we don’t have a congress, or senate that will listen to the MASS. We must take our soapbox to work, the one place where we still gather, and tell others about what we know. When they minor bird the latest story line from the Mass Media, we have to counter with the real story. If they shy from us, then so be it, but when they are near by, we shall speak. It is up to us, for there is no one else.
Bing Reply:
February 1st, 2009 at 9:42 pm
For me is a human a human.
I protect/help them because i don’t like to see bad things happen. But that’s why its me. Your not alone
February 1st, 2009 at 8:50 pm
Obama is a perfect goat leading sheeps to a bloody bloody bloody slaughter.
Butchers are watching….. They need your meet…..
To allllll blind sheep: Come to the Great Goat, follow him, he will lead you to a wanderful world………..
February 1st, 2009 at 10:12 pm
Once more, check and find out yourselve, how Hitler or (probably also Obama) could have become the evil:
This is just one example (of an article)! More are available that will make you very doubt! Just need to search (on text and video’s). Time to get scared, huh!
read review: http://educate-yourself.org/mc.....ep08.shtml
1. The New World Order is run by alien overlords. Humans aren’t calling the shots, Dracos reptilian aliens are calling the shots. Most “human” representatives of the Illuminati, puppet politicians, and military leaders are human/alien hybrids or 100% reptilian shape-shifters (Chimeras) or CLONES of the original person. The current Secretary of the Treasury, for instance, Henry Paulson, is likely a clone of the original Paulson who was killed last December according to Britain’s Christopher Story.
Choking Victim Reply:
February 2nd, 2009 at 2:37 am
Please tell me you’re joking…
February 1st, 2009 at 10:24 pm
There is no truth to this at all. If anybody would take time to read both the U. S. Constitution and the oath that ALL people who join the military, myself included, you would see that what uninformed factions, including Alex Jones, say about President Obama wanting to change things so that military personnel take a personal oath to him directly cannot be done under any circumstances. All military personnel swear an oath to protect and defend the U. S. Constitution and laws of the United States. What you say Obama wants to do would be against what the Constitution says, so the military would by right refuse to do so, as that would be an illegal order. And Congress would not let him get away with that eaither.
February 2nd, 2009 at 1:22 am
Ok, not to be rude here… but did anyone check the link lately?? The story is admitted BS… Gonzo journalism run amok. A fake. Not true. Bogus. Scam. Flee the fake stench! I saw this 2 days ago and didn’t fall for this junk… a simple google search for the blog title and reporter name turned up nothing and this was still published as “possibly true.” I thought you infowarriors were smarter than this, comeon guys!!?? I put up some crazy enough stuff on my own website, but even I can back it up with documentation, sheesh fellas. Make my prisonplanet.tv dollars worthwhile and don’t waste your time writing articles about stuff that clearly is not true. Folks are on edge enough as it is.
February 2nd, 2009 at 1:40 am
Fact remains deres a mulatto duppie in de white house, mon…
RUN LIKE HELL!
February 2nd, 2009 at 2:36 am
While I won’t let the wedge issues change my mind on someone, I am glad that the restrictions on abortions and stim cell research have been lifted–religious restrictions on thought and actions have held this race back far too long. However, I realize this was done unconstitutionally which concerns me even more. Furthermore, I pledge myself only to good I never said the pledge of allegiance and I sure as hell won’t pledge myself to any president. Not even my hero Ronnie ol’ boy (but he would never ask). I doubt even Obama will make anyone do that though. Sometimes infowars likes to use whatever it can scrounge up even if it is unfounded or blown out of proportion.
February 2nd, 2009 at 3:07 am
This essay is yellow journalism at its worst. Shame on Kurt Nimmo and Alex Jones.
February 2nd, 2009 at 3:25 am
Obama lacks even the intelligence of a Hitler I must say. He is stupid like a water melon. Blackberry Obama is a little kid who was mounted as a president. He was elected to give America a good “inauguration” time cuddling time – no suprise now it is over.
February 2nd, 2009 at 3:58 am
Instead of crouching towards Bethlehem this site is quibbling towards oblivion
February 2nd, 2009 at 4:14 am
Notmyauthority…100% correct- more paperwork…Blah, Blah, Blah. I used to care about the Con-stitution, Bill of Rights, and all that stuff. My moment of awakening was returning home from work to find my wife”s cremated remains dumped on our kitchen table, because the 3rd world eighth wits who robbed me thought it was cocaine. I’ll be darned if I’ll waste any more time trying to educate that bunch of alcohol swilling dope sucking sports addicted morons I used to call friends.
February 2nd, 2009 at 6:27 am
All I am going to say is this:
Oh f--- we are so f---ing f---ed.
There we go!
A post that doesn’t insult anyone
February 2nd, 2009 at 8:54 am
I only made it 1 half way through the replies, its like a giant Hen party.
Man is only as good as His WORD.
correct me if I didn’t get that right. LOL
February 2nd, 2009 at 6:10 pm
Tim Osman, that note was not there originally, and it took some time for her to clarify. And a “tag” of satire is hardly obvious. Apparently, this Michele Chang deceiver is trying to sell her book – she certainly just got a lot of exposure.
Cleary though, few will be surprised with anything NObama the fraud does or will do.
February 2nd, 2009 at 8:31 pm
The Constitution itself is the document that will save US, if we ever choose to follow its mandates. And no one can dispute neither the authenticity, nor the contents of this enabling document.
February 2nd, 2009 at 11:19 pm
Kurt Nimmo and Alex Jones never had credibility with me but if I was so stupid and paranoid that they did it would be gone now.
February 6th, 2009 at 9:14 pm
You want to know how to stop New World Order??? You must attack the MONEY! Today, as we experience an engineered global financial collapse, you have the unique opportunity to make your voice heard. British ‘Empire’ or the banks of London have always been in control. You can get educated and watch the fight – punch by punch at this site: http://www.larouchepac.com.