December 15, 2009
Aside from the most important environmental issues, population control has also been discussed at the Copenhagen climate summit. More and more governments are looking into a policy similar to that of China (a policy according to which a family is only allowed to have one child) as a possible solution to problems such as overpopulation.
We do not hear too much about China here in the states and reports on this one child policy. So, I thought I would provide you all with some research links, facts and the cold reality of how China treats humans
China’s one-child policy spawns secret slaughter: Vast exercise in social engineering proves lethal to millions of girls and puts the population out of balance
MILLIONS of baby girls are believed to have been quietly put to death in China as a result of its rigid ‘one-child’ policy of population control. In male- dominated rural areas, the pressure to have a son is so strong that girls often disappear shortly after birth, giving parents another chance to ensure their only child is a boy.
Now peasant tradition has found a modern reinforcement – pre-natal scanning. In one rural township where parents have been able to discover the sex of their children in the womb, more than three boys are being born for every two girls. The Communist Party committee in Zaozhuang, in the northern province of Shandong, has warned that officials who have used scanning to detect and abort female babies will be stripped of their posts and membership.
Obtaining evidence of this secret slaughter has never been easy, except for the growing disparity in population statistics.
China defended its family planning policy as a way to reduce global warming. According to Beijing, its one-child and birth control policies, which include forced abortions and sterilisations on unwilling women, are part of its global strategy to fight climate problems and should be adopted by the international community. – Asia News
Population controls can save the environment and the international community should adopt China’s one-child policy with that objective in mind, Chinese government sources said. The head of China’s delegation to the UN Conference on Climate in Danish capital urged US President Barack Obama to cut greenhouse gases. European leaders pulled an all-nighter to reach a deal on helping developing countries fight global warming. The € 6 billion (US$ 9 billion) aid package would be spread over three years.
Keep in mind that China is a communist country and this baby killing advice is coming from a land where pollution kills 750,000 in China every year. Apparently carbon emitting and polluting factories that produce toys and clothes for the world in slave factories are more valued than human lives.
In an article in the UK Telegraph in 2007, they reported:
Pollution kills three quarters of a million people in China every year, according to previously unreleased World Bank statistics.
The figures, almost twice previous estimates, were calculated using a new statistical model. But they have been suppressed until now because the government feared they would cause social unrest, according to reports.
I assume in China it is easier to find a willing doctor to perform abortions then it is to be a mayor of a city. Wanted: Mayor for polluted China city
BEIJING (AFP) – A city in northern China notorious for its pollution and deadly mining accidents is having trouble finding willing candidates for mayor and Communist Party chief, state media reported Wednesday.
The two top posts have been vacant since September in Linfen, regularly cited as one of China’s most polluted cities, when their former occupants were sacked over a mining disaster that killed 270 people, the China Daily said.
So has their one child policy and look the other way at polluting factories worked? Well, if you consider human rights violations, corruption and baby soup just part of the baby killing business then I guess, yes. Later the BBC wrote an article titled: Has China’s one-child policy worked?
But there is a more sinister aspect to this policy, which is sometimes employed to make women less willing than Ms Zhao accept the rules.
Activist Chen Guangcheng was sent to prison last year for exposing what he says were over-zealous health workers in Linyi city, Shandong Province.
He says they illegally forced women to have late-term abortions and be sterilised.
Listening to these clowns is like letting your children listen to Ted Bundy, Charles Manson or Richard Ramirez give them tips on how to kill straight from Death Row. It just does not make moral sense to me.
Yesterday, I reported on the inhumane act of using aborted human fetuses in soup and other Chinese dishes that is currently accepted and legal in China:
Dead babies can be purchased in Taiwan for 70 US dollars for being used as grilled delicacies.- Seoul Times
An Email report received by The Seoul Times confirmed that news with several vivid and appalling pictures of human embryos fetuses being made into a soup for human consumption.
The report went on. A town in the southern province of Canton (Guangdong) is now on trend taking baby herbal soup to increase overall health and stamina and the power of sexual performance in particular.
But apparnatly to others who live in what appear to be civilized societies are recommending that we adopt China’s one child policy.
So who in the West wants to bring the people under China’s forced abortion, one child policy? Well, lets take a look.
According to Diane Francis (a Canadian journalist who is recommending such measures), the world’s population would be reduced from 6.5 billion to 3.43 billion by 2075. She called it an inconvenient truth that we all need to accept and called kids carbon emmiting units:
However, there is one inconvenient truth that she forgot to mention in her baby killing article: Canadian Journalist, Diane Francis has two kids (excuse me readers, carbon emitting units ) herself. It gets worse folks, her sister also has two carbon emitting, polluting little units. AKA Children
Is Diane Francis a lying hypocrite?
She is not the only one who sees population control as a potential solution. Several “alleged” experts see population control as an alternative to technologies which have a lower emission of carbon dioxide as their main focus. They appear to be using China as a scientific role model of what can be done by forced abortions and inprisonimg people for having more than one child.
Britain’s Optimum Population Trust put together a study called,
REDUCING FUTURE CARBON EMISSIONS BY INVESTING IN FAMILY PLANNING which analyzed carbon dioxide emissions as well as population control as two potential solutions to the environmental problems our planet is or will be confronted with. Their study (considered cynical by quite a few people) analyzes things from two perspective: the costs associated with technologies which reduce carbon dioxide emissions on the one hand and population control as a measure of gradually reducing the planet’s population (less people who emit carbon dioxide – less carbon dioxide emissions, this is the part most people find extremely cynical) on the other hand.
The conclusion of their study: “The cost/ benefit analysis found that family planning is considerably cheaper than many low carbon technologies.”
If you visit their website they even have a human population ticker that supposedly measures world population growth and then under this ticker is says:
World population is projected to rise from today’s 6.8 billion to 9.15 billion in 2050.* The World Population Clock is ticking. We are rapidly destabilising our climate and destroying the natural world on which we depend for future life.
In other words, KILLING unborn babies and FORCED abortions are cheaper than cleaning up factories.
The “Case for Killing Junior” has just begun and I am afraid that the ruling class who control every facet of our society are hell bent on leading the West down this hellish path.
Apparently they are our Bad Shepard’s and we are the sheep.
This article was posted: Tuesday, December 15, 2009 at 3:56 pm