 |
 |
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
|
|||
 |
|||
|
|||
 |
|||
|
PETA Kills Animals
- Text size
Center for Consumer Freedom
April 2, 2009
April 2, 2009
Last week we published new government records showing that People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) operates a dog and cat slaughterhouse at its Norfolk, Virginia headquarters. And the news started spreading – fast. In the last 24 hours, hundreds of thousands of blog and newspaper readers have been briefed on PETA’s long-standing animal death program. Discussion forums are now teeming with angry pet lovers who want to see PETA pay the price for its unrepentant hypocrisy.
- A d v e r t i s e m e n t
-
- Social bookmarks
- Email this article
-
- Print this page
- Share on Twitter
April 2nd, 2009 at 7:30 am
Everybody kills and hurts animals , I guess it’s a favorite pastime !!! Since they can’t fight back ,
it’s also practical for frustrated cowards . Luckily , WW3 and the Illuminati Rackshashas
( man eating vampires ) will tear out plenty of new ass holes , as a karmic offering to the gods of
human stupidity , and that’s alright by me !!!
HillbillyJihad&TheBubbaLiberationFront Reply:
April 2nd, 2009 at 7:38 am
Food for thought eh’??? Arigato Gozaimasu!!!(Thanks). Karma is wonder is it not??? Still PETA is a bunch of Hyppo’s!!! Continue…please!!! “All ‘HAIL’ Thermal Expansion!!!”
Sir Baby De Porky Reply:
April 2nd, 2009 at 8:16 am
All glories to you ” Hillbilly ” , Oh great Guru of ” Thermal Expansion ” debunkin’ !!!
P.S. Did you ever study the effects of ” Baked cauliflower n’ taters cheese Gratin ” on
” Thermal Expansion ” yet ( as I proposed previously , but I know your holiness is very
busy !!! ) Let your humble disciple know the results , whenever your grace is ready !!!
BobLeeSwagger Reply:
April 2nd, 2009 at 11:48 am
I’m not suprised in the least PETA turns out to be a cess pool of hypocrisy- most usually are. I wont fly a distress flag on this one, cause karma dictates these assholes be publicly smeared and justice dictates they be stripped naked, dipped in pigs blood, have a couple quarter slabs of bacon hung around their necks, and then thrown in pits with starving bears.
Sir Baby De Porky Reply:
April 2nd, 2009 at 1:41 pm
What do you have against pigs ?!? Try bankster lard , there is plenty of it , and the bears
truthers will like it better , but the PETA is not always to blame , every meathead has a
hand in this karma , and labs that test on animals and their sponsors too !!!
BobLeeSwagger Reply:
April 2nd, 2009 at 4:07 pm
no argument on that- I figure pigs blood will taste better than the shitty flavor of banker lard.
enoch7 Reply:
April 2nd, 2009 at 8:17 am
Hey, Mike Vick is getting out of jail maybe he could head up PETA?
kidnapper Reply:
April 2nd, 2009 at 8:24 am
maybe he already was when he got busted.
RiverRunsRed Reply:
April 2nd, 2009 at 12:43 pm
The Center for Consumer Freedom, the source of this story, is actually run by big business lobbyist, which makes me wonder why Infowars would publish this article….These are the scumbags we need to be fighting…in no way am I say PETA is a refutable organization but I will not back an organization that lobbys politicians for big business
Steveo Reply:
April 2nd, 2009 at 6:48 pm
Your absolutely right. I don’t know why infowars would post an article written by lobbyist. Other websites they run are.. Animalscam.com Activistcash.com Fishscam.com Petakillsanimals.com centerforconsumerfreedom.com Obesitymyth.com? Physicainsscam.com. Dear god why would infowars disseminate this garbage. Like you said f*ck peta but why would you listen to lobbyist? Dropped the ball on this one infowars. Do your homework.
russell Reply:
April 3rd, 2009 at 10:23 am
there are so many other companies out there to be mad at, to get mad at peta is crazy. somebody needs to trhow blood on these dumb fucks that wear fur. look up the fur industry, its just pure evil.
Matthew Reply:
April 2nd, 2009 at 5:24 pm
People For the “ETHICAL” treatment of animals ….in many cases these animals need to be put down. Its the compassionate choice.
John Henke Reply:
April 3rd, 2009 at 12:21 am
I’m getting ready for the NWO. Anyone know where I can get a book about Filipino recipes?
I hear they have a lot of good dogie dishes, and there is a lot of dogs around here.
“No, I swear honey, it’s rabbit. I trapped it just this morning.”
April 2nd, 2009 at 7:33 am
PETA comes off as warm and fuzzy when in reality they’re really more Slicey and Dicey!!! Fuckin’ Hyppo’s!!! I’ll let Koreans harvest my dog before I’d let PETA get their dickbeaters on em’!!! Once again…Fuckin’ Hyppo’s!!! “All ‘HAIL’ Thermal Expansion!!!”
April 2nd, 2009 at 7:34 am
Penn and Teller exposed this some time ago I thought…
Billy Ruben Reply:
April 2nd, 2009 at 3:05 pm
http://video.google.com/videos.....&aq=f#
April 2nd, 2009 at 7:53 am
The real problem here is that we, as a society, think that animals such as dogs and cats must be enslaved and domesticated by a human slave master. It is time that we simply leave them alone and allow them to be free. We must let them make their own decisions, whether those decisions result in life or death. It is wrong to put them in prisons and extort those who have the capacity to empathize with their plight of captivity; it is wrong to rob them of their biological need to procreate by cutting off their genitals. Why can’t we pass on the ethics we hold for humans to other animals? Are we the only species who suffers and feels pain? Are we the only species who has a central nervous system? Must we rid and sanitize the entire earth of all life that is not human? Just as we respect by one another by reciprocating freedom, the same must be done with other species if we want to see an end to kill shelters and an end to the overpopulation of dogs and cats. Currently, we give them an incredible incentive to breed by feeding them and providing them with a safe, nurturing environment. If we were to remove that, let them roam freely, as squirrels, deer and rabbits do, they would eventually adapt to the environment. The mindset that we need to be involved in the lives of dogs and cats is asinine. It is one thing to nurture and care for those who have already been brought into the world via unnatural means and/or have already been spayed or neutered, but it is another to rob the unborn of their mothers, their families, their biological need for autonomy, and their freedom.
Big Ed Reply:
April 2nd, 2009 at 8:08 am
Good lord man, it’s fine to have cats and dogs as pets as long as they are treated kindly and not abused, mine are treated as part of the family and well provided for. They give love and recieve it as well. I pretty much prefer thier company over most people although I don’t put them above people as some nut jobs do.
johnbrown Reply:
April 2nd, 2009 at 9:49 am
this is PETA’s mantra…freedom for all animals. that’s what they hide behind.
they have been taken over and controlled for a long time. so has the HSUS.
their goal is to ban all cats and dogs as pets.
they advocate catching and killing all cats that are allowed outdoors.
Infowars, please get this info out.
Frank P Reply:
April 2nd, 2009 at 11:37 am
for the record, i don’t support PETA, and I don’t encourage catching OR killing cats. i encourage people to leave them the hell alone.
April 2nd, 2009 at 8:19 am
I cant say I agree with Frank, because then you would have feral dogs in packs, killing little kids. Nobody wants that. Dogs were bred by man, from a common ancestor the wolf. Since we were responsible for bringing the diffrent species of dogs into existence, we should step up to the plate and take care of them. Neuter and spay programs work. I know irresponsible people that just let there cats and dogs breed freely, they are always trying to pawn a puppy or kitten off on someone. I have several “sad cases” that I have rescued. I think PETA should be ashamed of themselves. looks like I and others like me are doing a better job at “rescue” than PETA, and I do it on my own, and don’t ask a red cent for it. PETA should spend more on “doing the right thing”, and less on paying there veggie movie stars to make nude commercials!
Sir Baby De Porky Reply:
April 2nd, 2009 at 8:36 am
People are supposed to be more spread out on land , where they can produce nice things to eat
or medicinal plants , not be packed up like flies on shit in mega cities , in which case , pets like cats n’ dogs can become very useful , as opposed to being considered ” pests ” !!! Again , it’s
the ” humans ” that suck a big one !!!
vet4life63 Reply:
April 2nd, 2009 at 8:56 am
As Redd Fox said ” did you ever stop to think what would have happened if the pilgrims had eaten bobcat instead of turkey on Thanksgiving”?” We’d all be eating Thanksgiving pussy”!
But seriously.
Anyone who has ever seen a starving, I mean skin and bones, neglected litter of pups and the mother who TRIES to nurse them but she is so weak she cannot even get up ( makes my stomach turn) will come to two conclusions.
1. We, humans can be some cruel nasty son-of-a-bitches.
2. Spay and neuter programs do help, in that if given a choice to never be born, or to be born only to suffer from starvation for a few weeks in intense pain, before dying, which one would you choose? It’s quite clear that less suffering is preferable. More responsible too.
Marik Bromine Reply:
April 2nd, 2009 at 10:42 am
No life preferable to a short wretched life? I wouldn’t say that it is quite clear, rather it appears highly complicated. Now, we seem to contend that we would choose freedom over slavery, but that is only because we have tasted (or heard myths of) a life of freedom. Those born into slavery only know of freedom what others tell them, thus their perspective is skewed, their point of reference is lower, their calibration is maladjusted, and if you were born into slavery and knew nothing of a better life, you might suspect that what is might be all that ever was and therefore nothing would be better or worse than what you’ve got; you might be content with suffering if it is all you’ve ever known, and the only other option was death. Pain is a learned response. Ever see a kid fall down, scrape a knee, look up with no reaction, then finally, only after seeing panic or fear on his mother’s face, begin to cry? The kid didn’t know how to respond to the pain until taught how to respond. Now, I know this is not the case universal, but for some pains it appears to be so. Masochism can be learned, twisting your nipples or cutting, or burning whilst reinforcing some simultaneous pleasure centers can cause you to learn to enjoy and crave pain, we can be retrained, we can transform pain into pleasure if we so choose…what is truly confusing is why more people do not choose to reprogram themselves thusly. We are so very pliant and flexible, our realities are only the shoddy constructs of unskilled, careless and ignorant engineers, our parents teach us lessons that they themselves only marginally understand or grasp, we learn lessons about society from a society that doesn’t know how to teach nor how to learn, thus everything we know is complete and utter garbage hacked together by the hands of fools and charlatans. A painful existence can be the most beautiful thing in the world, if you want it to be. Poverty can feel enormously rich, if you want it to. It’s actually very sick that people still choose to remain living “horrible” lives when if they just changed their perspective, they could be living amazing, rich, prosperous existences. People seem to like to suffer, otherwise they would stop it. There is nothing in my life right now that I do not enjoy. For a brief time I despised rush hour traffic…until I changed my attitude, I still spend the same amount of time in rush hour traffic, but now I enjoy it. Voila. Sure, you might say, that’s only denial, but is it? Perhaps the annoyance is the denial. Compared to nonexistence, even the shittiest life is profoundly beautiful and wonderful. “Better to have loved and lost than never to have loved at all,” well, Shakespeare, perhaps better to have lived and suffered than never to have lived at all. People love their sufferings, it is one of the main components of gossip, news, innovation, invention, research, and progress. If we all ceased to suffer, we would eliminate all advancements from the world, we would eliminate all new technologies, since these are spurred by tackling challenges and overcoming obstacles and adversities. If there were no hurdles in our way, we would have nothing to strive to conquer, all human ambition would dry up, all human forward momentum would slow and we’d be left with a dull monotony, devoid of the turbulances and turmoils that daily entertain and distract, amuse and fascinate and inspire and confound.
vet4life63 Reply:
April 2nd, 2009 at 11:23 am
Tell that to a puppy who hasn’t nursed but twice in his life because mother is so malnourished she can’t even produce milk in any quantity. Perhaps if you twist his nipples and rub his genitals, he will be glad he was born.
What you are saying is that if we “decide to be happy” then “we will be happy”. Point taken. Is there anything wrong with preventing suffering in the first place, or is all cheese and crackers,ass long as you are not the one suffering? Which is more responsible to let pets breed until the resources available can no longer sustain them, all in the name of “having lived”? There are infinite amounts of food, water etc available to ANY species on this planet. Is living in a nursing home, helpless, laying in your own piss and shit, better than just giving up the ghost, all in the name of being alive? OR is it better to have responsibility for those that are weaker than us, and who deserve to be cared for, and not allow anyone to lay in a nursing home in there own piss and shit, but rather, make sure they are cleaned up if that does occur and right away? Is it ever ok to over-populate to the misery of all of a species?
I don’t think a 3 week old puppy that is dying from starvation, has the same faculties you and I have. All it knows is the pain, it’s hungry, and it is dying. You can’t say now, think positive little pooch..at least you got to live! If I was in that puppy’s place it just wouldn’t be worth it. 3 weeks of live..no wait, not even life, unless you concede that life = misery. Because it’s not even really life. It’s cruelty, caused by dumb ass humans with there head up there asses. Afraid to spend the 50 bucks to get there family pet spayed/neutered so innocents don’t needlessly suffer. Kinda compares to what the bankers are doing to us.. and how do we feel about that? Money isn’t always a legitimate reason for not doing the right thing. You can rationalize all you want, but pain still hurts…It’s one thing if you do it to me. It’s a low blow if you do it to a helpless puppy. And people who don’t spay or neuter, then dump dogs/starve dogs etc, are indirectly inflicting pain on a helpless animal due to there own apathy. They are too busy twisting there nipples and rubbing there genitals.
Frank P Reply:
April 2nd, 2009 at 8:58 am
Well, there is some truth to this. There are wild dogs roaming around as we speak, they are called coyotes. However, coyotes rarely ever attack humans, even when they are in packs. But I will agree that small children are more susceptible to attack. The solution to this is: A) If you’re going to let your kids roam freely (which probably shouldn’t occur until they have the capacity to defend themselves), they should be taught how to defend themselves. Kids should also carry weapons and know how to use them if they are at risk for being harmed. B) Additionally, if the dogs were attacking or killing small kids, then it would be the responsibility of the parents, to protect their children. Self preservation always comes first, and if that means killing your attacker to protect yourself, it must be done.
Furthermore, there are domesticated dogs in the wild. While domesticated dogs aren’t as apt for hunting as say the wolf who has not been domesticated, they have much better hunting skills than a human. Furthermore, dogs will eat just about anything including grasses and other plants. If left to their own devices dogs could survive rather easily in the wild. Much better than a human in the wild. Sure it’s not as easily as being fed every meal by a human, but certainly more fulfilling? As long as they are taught how to hunt effectively, read the language of other dogs, be part of a pack, and their genitals are not taken from them, we don’t need to take care of them. They can take care of themselves.
I commend your efforts of helping dogs and cats who have been robbed of a proper life. That shows great empathy, and I wish there were more people who had that quality. I too love dogs, cats, and all animals, so I understand your sentiment. However, just like it’s not your job to make sure poor people don’t breed even though they can’t take care of their children, it’s also not your job to feed and take care of those who are bringing new people into the world. If anything it’s your job to not feed and take care of them. If they were not being fed, and were forced to provide for themselves, they would either starve, die and not have children or they would work hard, have children, and take care of them. The same is true with other animals sir. You must let others live. You must let others die (as long as they are not being murdered). You must give them a chance. You must allow them to fail. It’s great to be a friend, but you’re no longer being a friend and you’re no longer helping them when you’re giving them everything and not allowing them to live their own lives and take care of themselves. Because in the end, our ability to take care of ourselves and our family is what life is all about.
vet4life63 Reply:
April 2nd, 2009 at 9:43 am
I understand your compassion for animals, and the theory of “survival of the fittest”. You are referring to nature, and yes, even nature can be cruel; I.E. A bird with a broken wing, a zebra being eaten while still alive, etc. Have you ever watched the show “Life after people”? It can be found on the History channel.
In that show they address what would happen to dgs if there were no people to care for them. most would go extinct in a matter of years. all of your little house dogs, poms, poodles, etc would go extinct completely. they would become prey themselves, or would not be capable of catching food in sufficient quantity to stay alive. All of the dogs with short squat noses, such as pugs and bulldogs would go extinct. They are not adapted to hunting. the dogs that the scientists say would do the best are your average run of the mill mutt in the 45 to 55 lb range. At first they would scavenge. Eventually they would interbreed with coyotes and wolves, and form hunting packs. the whole gene pool would just blend together, all dogs would be mutts of some sort, and all about the same size and with the same characteristics ensuring survival. You could forget and particular breed existing. just a blending of genes until not recognizable as a collie or a retriever. all would be more or less coyotes or wolves again. at least 60 breeds would become completely extinct and wiped out. Survival of the fittest. Toy poodles arent going to run in packs and take over a kill or make much of a kill themselves. mange and parvo and rabies would run rampant.
Having said that, WE made them what they ARE today by breeding them a certain way. This is ARTIFICIAL not natural breeding. We bred them to weigh less than 5 lbs, or to have long hair ( which would be easily matted and infested with parasites in the wild). We bred them to retrieve birds or guard sheep, or sit and look pretty. All of our breeing of them was not in there best interest. We took away survival traits. SInce we were resposible for that…we should be responsible for ensuring that we take care of them. To let them run wild would mean whole sale slaughter. tens of thousands hit by cars. thousands upon thousands killed for being a nuisance. Thousands more killed by wide spread and rampant diseases.
OR we could simply be responsible. Don’t let your dog have litter after litter. feed it, care for it, do the right thing. The dogs would be happier. I understand you saying ” you must allow them to fail”, as part of natural selction and survival of the fittest. It would be akin to driving you out to a place 200 miles away from anywhere, dumping your ass out, no clothing, no tools, nothing and saying.. well if you die you die.. What we have done is taken there SURVIVAL adaptations away from them. Now just turn em loose and say I hope it works out for ya pooch? for a few it would, but your talking about death far beyond the scope of what PETA alledgedly did in the article. If people would just be RESPONSIBLE, then pets wouldnt have to go thru the suffering that they do. I know you love dogs so I hope you can see my points.
C Reply:
April 2nd, 2009 at 2:46 pm
you cant prove that evolution wouldn’t have allowed small dogs or long haired dogs to survive in areas of the world where those traits would help them survive.your rant smells of history channel unfounded-fact-based propaganda (Just like how global warming is supposedly COMPLETELY man-made, and no other factors come into play). and animal disease epidemics come more from housing them in large numbers with other animals (i.e. breeding mills), than from letting them be “wild”
I DO, however, agree with your last paragraph. its totally spot on
Jonathan Brooks Reply:
April 2nd, 2009 at 3:13 pm
At age 5, I faced a pack of feral dogs while on a 2 block walk from my house to the 7-11. Maybe I deserved to be ripped apart, since I did not have the good sense to cower in my house, or pack heat with me everywhere I went, but the situation was what it was.
When left to their own devices in the wild, dogs do one of two things. They starve, or learn to live in packs, eating garbage and occasional solitary kids.
I survived, thanks to training in dog behavior from my grandparents, and a handy four foot tall wire fence, which allowed me to keep the dogs from circling me or taking me down, since they could not pull me down from the top of the fence, where I hung myself with my arms and shoulders.
I faught the dogs for an hour, with six of various sizes going at me in groups and alone. I sustained several bites, but none fatal, and I finally got enough boots to the head of the lead dog to get him to give up and lead his pack to easier pickings.
I learned two things from tthat fight.
First, dogs need to be taken care of, or they can be a menace to humans.
Second, dogs are NOT a part of nature, but companion animals, and they do not fit in nature as anything but pack predators, which human society generally does not tolerate in cities.
johnbrown Reply:
April 2nd, 2009 at 9:49 am
Frank is a PETA troll.
April 2nd, 2009 at 8:33 am
i never trusted those PETA fucks
April 2nd, 2009 at 8:45 am
People Eating Tasty Animals.
April 2nd, 2009 at 9:03 am
“humanely euthanized” hah. that’s an oxymoron
dennis Reply:
April 2nd, 2009 at 10:25 am
how bout we humanely euthanize her?
April 2nd, 2009 at 9:34 am
http://consumerfreedom.com/art.....rticle/154
Urge the United States Treasury Department to cancel the tax-exempt status currently extended to People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) and its affiliated organizations under Section 501(c) of the U.S. Treasury Code.
April 2nd, 2009 at 10:01 am
duh…
they would rather a animal be dead than for it to be a pet
April 2nd, 2009 at 10:01 am
Hahaha, they actually KILL Animals to save money for advertisement!
Just like the government drains pension funds to make more advertisement for the Obama Jugent…
They really belong together… in jail!
Eric Reply:
April 2nd, 2009 at 11:01 am
The irony of all ironies is that PETA kills animals to save money for advertisements which tell us not to kill animals.
It’s exactly like Bush when he said “I’ve abandoned free market principles in order to save the free market.”
April 2nd, 2009 at 10:20 am
Disgusting… Helpless animals being executed.
It won’t be long until “they” start in on you.
dennis Reply:
April 2nd, 2009 at 10:27 am
i believe thats the whole reason for the story ,wendy.
Marik Bromine Reply:
April 2nd, 2009 at 11:12 am
I was thinking the exact same thing. Get people to think that if it is in an animal’s best interest to be euthenized, then it might be in the best interest of particular humans to be euthenized…not to mention the neutering and spaying of some human critters that is likely to occur. “It’s humane to ensure that animals cannot breed…we love animals, we want them to be treated as we treat each other, therefore it is humane to ensure that humans cannot breed.”
dennis Reply:
April 2nd, 2009 at 11:30 am
exactly, good call marik
April 2nd, 2009 at 10:48 am
Micheal Vick ceo of peta??? hmmm..
dennis Reply:
April 2nd, 2009 at 11:34 am
im a falcons fan and i dont think he should ever play again.and i also feel he needs to perform some kind of service so he can see keep others from traveling the road hes on,and the right way of behaving for a human being. when you take on a pet i feel that you should be responsible for that animal like it was a member of the family not a disposable source of income!!!!!!!!!!!
April 2nd, 2009 at 10:50 am
well atleast they practice exterminating pets so that when they do it to us they know how to do it more effeciently
April 2nd, 2009 at 10:53 am
ROFL!!!!!!!!
April 2nd, 2009 at 10:55 am
Eugenics seems to lie at the heart of many organizations. To PETA, and to the environmentalists, killing people and animals is a glorious thing.
April 2nd, 2009 at 11:01 am
Well, what did you expect from a group that sanctions (sanctioned?) efforts by groups of people to confront and possibly cause injury or kill hunters that are trying to practice their sport legally? Did you really think that a “humane” group that practices (practiced?) inhumane treatment of fellow humans would have any more kindness to offer an animal? Get real, actions have always spoken of these peoples’ morals louder than any lofty ideal they may espouse for convenience. Choose to disbelieve what you don’t see practiced by anyone.
Marik Bromine Reply:
April 2nd, 2009 at 11:48 am
Not that I doubt the validity of what you say, but could you elaborate, perhaps a link to a story, I’m not sure I know of what you’re referencing and would like to get on the same page as you. I’ve never heard of PETA assaulting hunters…though it seems plausible, given that when words fail, as they are apt to, escalations can erupt quickly.
What I don’t really understand is when PETA hassles meat eaters who are just trying to enjoy a tasty burger. The cow is already dead, has been for quite some time, they are trying to tackle the issue of animal cruelty from the very distant, frayed end of it that is the consumer…seems more actionable to go to the source of problems, the source of the leak, not just perpetually mop up the puddle that has formed and will form again soon. Fix the leaky pipe, fix the cruelty in slaughterhouses, trying to change the consumers is going to be an endless battle. But I suppose they might say, the consumers demand that the animals are killed…well, my will for a knife to grace a throat does not pull the blade, I am not a jedi, my desires do not move mountains, the machinations catering to my desires do that…
April 2nd, 2009 at 11:02 am
If we wern’t supposed to eat animals, why are they so damn tasty?
Nyssa Reply:
April 2nd, 2009 at 7:17 pm
LMFAO!!!!!
Blouk Reply:
April 2nd, 2009 at 11:14 pm
They wouldn’t taste that great if it was plain ol’ meat, it’s actually quite disgusting.
April 2nd, 2009 at 11:09 am
this does not surprise me one bit.. Thank YOU FOR sharing this information and EXPOSING THIS COMPANY!
April 2nd, 2009 at 11:16 am
PETA ain’t all bad. My mom used to work at an animal shelter when I was a kid. Some dogs and cats come into that place after being hit by cars, starved, diseased, and worse. Sometimes the only option left for these animals is to ease their suffering and put them to sleep.
Don’t let headlines anywhere result in a knee jerk reaction. I am guilty of killing a cat. My old 14 year old cat had cancer and when it got to the point the cat would lie around not moving because it was too painful, we took the compassionate step and put her to sleep.
All pet owners go through this. PETA tries hard to lead people into a vegetarian/animal loving society, and I respect that. Their only problem is that they are BIG, and all the tomato tossing public love to see a giant lose face.
April 2nd, 2009 at 11:36 am
Just remember, since the godless think humans are only ‘mere animals’ how they treat animals is a blueprint for how they will treat their own Grandmas.
April 2nd, 2009 at 11:37 am
http://petakillsanimals.com/ has been around for years. Nothing new here folks…
April 2nd, 2009 at 11:40 am
And just think!
This is the same group that protested outside of Michael Vick’s dog fighting case.
They spearheaded the media destruction of this man and of the Atlanta Falcons for employing him.
Meanwhile they are slaughtering dogs by the thousands, yearly!
April 2nd, 2009 at 11:57 am
i need help heres the link you say isnt here http://petakillsanimals.com/do.....nimals.pdf now tell me theres no proof this is petas own document.
Will Wright Reply:
April 2nd, 2009 at 12:16 pm
Firstly, this link is not on the Infowars post, which is the one I’m discussing. No, there is no proof that this is a PETA document. Apparently you’re not familiar with Microsoft Word programs. Even if it is a PETA document it doesn’t state anywhere nor is there a category that states, “Animals Slaughtered.” Shelters put animals to sleep when they cannot find them homes after a certain length of time.
Did you actually read the pdf? Do you have any idea the ratio of animals abused then rescued to the amount of people who actually adopt pets? I volunteered at an animal shelter for some time, very rarely do animals get adopted and that is the problem. When foolish owners allow their pets to breed, they either let them loose or send them to a shelter. Thus, there are too many for a non-profit shelter to support.
I don’t think you fully understand the gravity of the issue nor do you understand how many animals are mistreated and homeless. If you did, you might understand why there are not enough resources to accommodate ALL of the animals. Keep in mind it is a non-profit organization.
I’m against putting animals to sleep, and sadly I had to put my dog to sleep years ago, but animal shelters do it all the time, why never say anything about them? Either way, PETA does not “Slaughter” these animals. Go adopt a cat or dog if you care so much. I did.
You need to think just a little bit more.
dennis Reply:
April 2nd, 2009 at 5:18 pm
the infowars link takes you to the original .and by the way i run a reptile rescue so i know about unwanted animals.my beef with peta is they protest people who wear fur that is grown on a farm for that purpose but its ok for them to euthanize animals? my stance is the animals have no say in any of this and the people who are there to protect them are hipocrities. that was my point. i myself am an animal lover. and if you look at the other wild preservation societys are the same people who want all humans dead. local shelters make no bones about letting you know they put animals down,this stands against everything peta stands for.
Will Wright Reply:
April 2nd, 2009 at 7:02 pm
My original comment was never directed at you. I just noticed that there is a lot of misinformation on this site and I wanted to point that out. I’m a regular listener but I just cannot believe everything I see here due to a lack of proof.
I know we all care about animals. I care about animals as well, that’s why I’m a vegan. I feel that PETA does push it sometimes, but they euthanize usually due to the animals deteriorating health, that doesn’t mean however, that they should not be investigated lawfully. This is a tragedy and I wish animals did not have to be euthanized but we have the owners to blame for that.
Unfortunately, many big organizations are hypocritical and as a consequence, they are destructive. I know you see that; that’s why you and I are both here now. I just feel that as we have learned from the problems with our government, we should be more careful in what we believe and should never assume all information is true without research.
dennis Reply:
April 3rd, 2009 at 5:22 pm
fair enough, thank you for not being ignorant, thats all any of us want is the truth.wish you the best of luck,dennis
C Reply:
April 2nd, 2009 at 7:48 pm
I wouldnt go so far as to drill it into people’s heads that its a “non-profit org.”. how can you call a group that takes in millions each year, and puts it all into lobbying and propaganda, “non-profit” when they dont actually put any of that money into keeping SOME of those animals alive. why not run adds about proper pet care and show adds for adoptable pets instead of telling me i cant wear leather boots or eat a chicken dinner.
fuckin-A
April 2nd, 2009 at 12:05 pm
People, humans, should NOT own animals. Period!
They are NOT meant to be a humans “pet/slave/captive”. They were created to be wild and FREE! Sorta like us! I can prove that too with a bit of “reverse psychology”.
quote:
“Men cannot be governed and remain men. Domesticate the wolf and he changes both physically and mentally. His muzzle shrinks. His teeth diminish. He loses size, speed & strength. He grows spots, his ears flops, his brain withers. He becomes a DOG! Men are on the verge of becoming DOGS — the changes are underway already — unless we do something to stop it!”
Nyssa Reply:
April 2nd, 2009 at 7:19 pm
kinda like humans and technolgy…
C Reply:
April 2nd, 2009 at 8:01 pm
For the record DOGS DID NOT EVOLVE FROM WOLVES, THEY SHARE COMMON ANCESTRY they developed independantly like cyotes, jackals, wild dogs in africa, foxes, etc.
i own animals, i care for them properly. deal with it. there is a species of ant that rounds up and “milks” a certain kind of caterpillar. dogs and humans can live symbiotically like that…its no wonder people cant care for their animals, people have not been taught to properly care for themselves in most cases.
its not your right to tell me i cant live harmoniously with my fuckin pets
vet4life63 Reply:
April 3rd, 2009 at 8:53 am
“The first dog domesticated by man was a wolf…. The remains found in the Beaverhead mountains of Idaho and those found in Europe, Asia and pre-Columbian America all belong to the same epoch. The friendship between man and dog is one of the oldest and most lasting in history.” Simon & Schuster’s Guide to Dogs, ISBN 0-67-1-25527-4
“Herre and his colleagues at the institute had come to the firm conclusion on the basis of a large number of skull measurements and examinations of the size and structure of the brain, blood factors, and numbers of chromosomes that all dogs, whether Pekingese, bulldogs or Alsatians, were descended solely from the wolf and not, as has often been assumed, from the wolf and the jackal. “The domesticated wolf is the dog”. The Wolf, a Species in Danger, Dr. Erik Zimen, Delacorte Press, NY, ISBN 0-440-09619-7
“Somewhere in early history a young wolf was brought into the family circle of man and through the years became the source of the domestic dog and our most successful and useful experiment in domestication”. From foreword written by Ian McTaggart Cowan, Dean of Graduate Studies and Professor of Zoology, University of British Columbia, to The Wolf, Ecology and Behavior of an Endangered Species, Dr. L. David Mech, USFWS, Natural History Press, Garden City NY, ISBN 0-385-08660-1
“Wolf-dog Genetics”, N.A. Iljin, 1941
“The Phylogeny of dogs”, W.D. Matthew, 1930
“Although the subject continues to be controversial, most authorities now agree that all dogs, from chihuahuas to dobermans are descended from wolves which were tamed in the Near East ten or twelve thousand years ago”. Wolves, C. Savage, Sierra Club Book, ISBN 0-87156-689-3
C Reply:
April 2nd, 2009 at 8:03 pm
its kinda like saying all small cats evolved from lions
vet4life63 Reply:
April 3rd, 2009 at 10:26 am
Actually all cats came from the same branch on the evolutionary tree, and then that branch, spread out. Actually LIONS EVOLVED FROM SMALL CATS. You just had it reversed.
The first true cat to arise from Viverravidae was Proailurus (first cat”) around 30 million years ago. The best-known species was P lemanensis, found in France.
Proailurus was a small weasel-like cat with relatively short legs and a long body. It had one more premolar on each side of its bottom jaw than do modern cats. About 20 million years ago, Proailurus gave rise to Pseudaelurus. Pseudaelurus were Miocene ancestors of cats. Pseudaelurus lorteti was about the size of a large lynx while P validus was the size of a large lynx or small puma. Three other species of early cat are described as Pratifelis, Vishnufelis and Sivaelurus (S chinjienis).Pseudaelurus went on to split into two major groups: the Machairodontinae (true sabre-tooths) and Schizailurus (the ancestor of the modern day Felidae group).
http://www.messybeast.com/cat-prehistory.htm
April 2nd, 2009 at 12:06 pm
And to think they just waste all that good meat!
April 2nd, 2009 at 12:32 pm
These bastards are POCKETING all that cash in donations!!!
Pitbull lovers HATE PETA because the director stated that ALL Pitbulls need to be put down so that no one has the opportunity to fight them! I say, that director bitch needs to be put out of HER misery! Whats good for the Pit is good for the director!!! HER FIRST!!!
April 2nd, 2009 at 12:52 pm
remember the title of this website: INFOWARS. before you start judging and condemning… do you research. find out who’s behind the publisher of this article (Center for Consumer Freedom http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/C.....r_Freedom) and where their funding and motivations come from. only then will you see the man behind the curtain… and that’s what Alex is all about.
April 2nd, 2009 at 2:27 pm
P.E.T.A. = People Eating Tasty Animals.
April 2nd, 2009 at 3:01 pm
Old news.
Any kind of involvment with animals includes culling.
Even the human animal.
Planet Earth is on a budget. A really slack one now.
Good gosh, with all the trillions of newly printed money, they should be able to buy and kill everything that moves. Hang on, that is old news too.
I am ashamed to be a member of this race. Capable of so many wonderful things yet we have never gotten out of the “rule the world” mentality.
Blouk Reply:
April 2nd, 2009 at 11:20 pm
I agree with you completely.
April 2nd, 2009 at 3:04 pm
PETA has posted a response to this article.
It’s called ‘Why We Euthanize’. WARNING:
The pictures are EXTREMELY DISGUSTING –
http://blog.peta.org/archives/.....?c=pmsbm08
Helena Reply:
April 2nd, 2009 at 3:22 pm
Thank you for posting the link to this.
April 2nd, 2009 at 4:55 pm
MISSING: PETA’s side of the story. DON’T REACT!! I don’t give a fuck about PETA either way. Go to JohnnyAmerican’s link and decide for yourself. What the fuck is The Center for Consumer Freedom? Another bullshit political-party, think-tank, propaganda-front website (this time Fake-Conservative)? They always have these names like The Coalition for American Justice, or Project for a New American Cocksucker, or The People for Super Americanism and Liberty for Allness. IT’S ALL BULLSHIT!!!!!
April 2nd, 2009 at 5:13 pm
Penn and Teller Exposed this story years ago on their Showtime show Bullshit!
This is not even close to new news!
April 2nd, 2009 at 5:34 pm
BE FAIR to PETA!! They have always said that sometimes it is more humane to kill an animal humanely than to allow it to languish in a shelter if it is not adopted.
April 3rd, 2009 at 12:10 pm
There is one truth about PETA that not even the Center for Consumer Freedom dares not reveal, and that truth is that both PETA and the Center for Consumer Freedom are fronts for Rockefeller interests. The Center for Consumer Freedom is a Monsanto front who regularly puts out anti-organic propaganda. PETA has received funding from the Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors and remained quiet when David Rockefeller’s prized pig – Boris the Hog – was slaughtered at Rockefeller’s Stone Barm farm.
PETA’s Rockefeller connections
Oh, and CSPI (Center for Science in the Public Interest), Consumer Freedom’s other “opposition”? A Rockefeller front. THEY ARE ALL FUNDED BY AND WORKING FOR THE SAME PEOPLE!
April 3rd, 2009 at 5:15 pm
I wonder if Alex is doing this to piss off another certain other talk show host who happens to be vegan…
Darth Chaos Reply:
April 4th, 2009 at 1:38 pm
Not all vegans support PETA. In fact, I have come to know several vegans who absolutely abhor PETA, and they were not surprised when I revealed PETA’s connections to the Rockefellers through the RPA (Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors) and that PETA and Consumer Freedom are both Rockefeller fronts. And some of those vegans refuse to touch anything which has soy because the soy may come from Monsanto GMO soybeans. Yes, you can be a vegan without consuming soy. Just replace the soy with something like black-eyed peas, and replace soymilk with rice milk.
April 5th, 2009 at 3:27 am
STOP LISTENING TO THIS ‘ANTI-PETA’ CRAAAAAAAP!!!!!!!
I have written my research into this company on a blog on my band website….
PLEASE READ IT, AND LEARN THE TRUTH ABOUT ‘Peta kills animals’….Please give feed back on what u think and stop this corperate funded anti-peta onslaught!
http://blogs.myspace.com/index.....=346473442