
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Press Let Rip At Obama Spokesman Over Exclusion From Secret Meeting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.infowars.com/press-let-rip-at-obama-spokesman-over-exclusion-from-secret-meeting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.infowars.com/press-let-rip-at-obama-spokesman-over-exclusion-from-secret-meeting/</link>
	<description>Because there's a war on for your mind.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 13:48:23 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: limo bob</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/press-let-rip-at-obama-spokesman-over-exclusion-from-secret-meeting/comment-page-2/#comment-662699</link>
		<dc:creator>limo bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Dec 2008 01:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=2569#comment-662699</guid>
		<description>THE limousine of Police Minister Judy Spence has been caught speeding on the same day she launched new laws aimed at</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>THE limousine of Police Minister Judy Spence has been caught speeding on the same day she launched new laws aimed at</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Untolerable</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/press-let-rip-at-obama-spokesman-over-exclusion-from-secret-meeting/comment-page-2/#comment-435607</link>
		<dc:creator>Untolerable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 07:32:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=2569#comment-435607</guid>
		<description>I meant to say &quot;I would just about bet that neither Obama nor Hillary stayed at their Washington homes.&quot;

There would have been a congestion of vehicles around Feinstein&#039;s Washington home if a meeting existed. I believe Obama and Hillary are telling some tall tales. It may not be too hard to prove this. 

If these two traitors attended a Builderberg conference at the Westfield Marriott in Chantilly, Virginia, then I want to see the two punished by law. I&#039;m going to be following this story and thread.

By the way, are the people that work at the hotel sworn to secrecy?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I meant to say &#8220;I would just about bet that neither Obama nor Hillary stayed at their Washington homes.&#8221;</p>
<p>There would have been a congestion of vehicles around Feinstein&#8217;s Washington home if a meeting existed. I believe Obama and Hillary are telling some tall tales. It may not be too hard to prove this. </p>
<p>If these two traitors attended a Builderberg conference at the Westfield Marriott in Chantilly, Virginia, then I want to see the two punished by law. I&#8217;m going to be following this story and thread.</p>
<p>By the way, are the people that work at the hotel sworn to secrecy?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Untolerable</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/press-let-rip-at-obama-spokesman-over-exclusion-from-secret-meeting/comment-page-2/#comment-435598</link>
		<dc:creator>Untolerable</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 07:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=2569#comment-435598</guid>
		<description>I have questions as to where Dianne Feinstein&#039;s Washington home is located. Westfield&#039;s Marriott Hotel in Chantilly is 9 miles from Dulles Airport. What location was Obama and Hillary allegedly travelling from (the last time reporters saw them)? Depending on the exact location of Dianne Feinstein&#039;s Washington home, there may not be a legitimate time factor in distance travelled from the airport to her house. One report alleges Obama and Hillary met for about an hour. If this alleged meeting really took place at Feinstein&#039;s house, speculating the home is at least 30 minutes from Dulles Airport, then what hotel did Obama stay at following the meeting? I would like to know if there were any eyewitnesses to seeing a convoy of limos arriving at Feinstein&#039;s house. I&#039;m sure there were countless secret service agents surrounding the home while the one hour meeting allegedly took place. 

From what I see, the real truth of the where-abouts of Obama and Hillary are at the Bilderberg Conference. I would just about bet that Obama or Hillary stayed at their Washington homes. 

This investigation should be conducted. If they&#039;re fibbing or withholding information about an actual meeting that took place at the Westfield Marriott in Chantilly, then both Obama and Hillary should be charged for treason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have questions as to where Dianne Feinstein&#8217;s Washington home is located. Westfield&#8217;s Marriott Hotel in Chantilly is 9 miles from Dulles Airport. What location was Obama and Hillary allegedly travelling from (the last time reporters saw them)? Depending on the exact location of Dianne Feinstein&#8217;s Washington home, there may not be a legitimate time factor in distance travelled from the airport to her house. One report alleges Obama and Hillary met for about an hour. If this alleged meeting really took place at Feinstein&#8217;s house, speculating the home is at least 30 minutes from Dulles Airport, then what hotel did Obama stay at following the meeting? I would like to know if there were any eyewitnesses to seeing a convoy of limos arriving at Feinstein&#8217;s house. I&#8217;m sure there were countless secret service agents surrounding the home while the one hour meeting allegedly took place. </p>
<p>From what I see, the real truth of the where-abouts of Obama and Hillary are at the Bilderberg Conference. I would just about bet that Obama or Hillary stayed at their Washington homes. </p>
<p>This investigation should be conducted. If they&#8217;re fibbing or withholding information about an actual meeting that took place at the Westfield Marriott in Chantilly, then both Obama and Hillary should be charged for treason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: c</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/press-let-rip-at-obama-spokesman-over-exclusion-from-secret-meeting/comment-page-2/#comment-435596</link>
		<dc:creator>c</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 07:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=2569#comment-435596</guid>
		<description>but bildeberg doesent exist but it is good for you but doesent exist so that is good too, see, everythings fine</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>but bildeberg doesent exist but it is good for you but doesent exist so that is good too, see, everythings fine</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FreeinTX</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/press-let-rip-at-obama-spokesman-over-exclusion-from-secret-meeting/comment-page-2/#comment-434847</link>
		<dc:creator>FreeinTX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 14:42:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=2569#comment-434847</guid>
		<description>oops, sorry for the repeat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops, sorry for the repeat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FreeinTX</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/press-let-rip-at-obama-spokesman-over-exclusion-from-secret-meeting/comment-page-2/#comment-434845</link>
		<dc:creator>FreeinTX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 14:41:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=2569#comment-434845</guid>
		<description>“The very word “secrecy” is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. &quot; - John F. Kennedy

TREASON, I tell ya this is TREASON.

They lied to the press, got them on a plane, and after they were trapped, they get told about private, SECRET MEETINGS that our future president, and sitting Senator, is having and will have in the future with foreign dignitaries, in DIRECT VIOLATION OF FEDERAL LAW!!! (Logan Act)  

Yet, is CNN covering the fact that they were lied and basically kidnapped by the O&#039;Bama clan so that Barrack could attend a Bilderberg meeting?  And why wasn&#039;t there any reporters at the meeting to catch up with him after he gave the enterage reporters the slip?  I mean, a simple cell phone call by any of the reporters on the plane taxing down the runway to any reporters at the conference could have helped.  How about a cell phone call to any co-employee in Washington D.C.?  

It seems the press was absolutely willing to &quot;lose track&quot; of Barrack O&#039;Bama.  But it is curious how the media shows such concern about being lied to, yet the coverage of the hijacking of our media is completely blacked out on the actual news networks.

FreeinTX</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“The very word “secrecy” is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it. Even today, there is little value in opposing the threat of a closed society by imitating its arbitrary restrictions. Even today, there is little value in insuring the survival of our nation if our traditions do not survive with it. And there is very grave danger that an announced need for increased security will be seized upon by those anxious to expand its meaning to the very limits of official censorship and concealment. &#8221; &#8211; John F. Kennedy</p>
<p>TREASON, I tell ya this is TREASON.</p>
<p>They lied to the press, got them on a plane, and after they were trapped, they get told about private, SECRET MEETINGS that our future president, and sitting Senator, is having and will have in the future with foreign dignitaries, in DIRECT VIOLATION OF FEDERAL LAW!!! (Logan Act)  </p>
<p>Yet, is CNN covering the fact that they were lied and basically kidnapped by the O&#8217;Bama clan so that Barrack could attend a Bilderberg meeting?  And why wasn&#8217;t there any reporters at the meeting to catch up with him after he gave the enterage reporters the slip?  I mean, a simple cell phone call by any of the reporters on the plane taxing down the runway to any reporters at the conference could have helped.  How about a cell phone call to any co-employee in Washington D.C.?  </p>
<p>It seems the press was absolutely willing to &#8220;lose track&#8221; of Barrack O&#8217;Bama.  But it is curious how the media shows such concern about being lied to, yet the coverage of the hijacking of our media is completely blacked out on the actual news networks.</p>
<p>FreeinTX</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FreeinTX</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/press-let-rip-at-obama-spokesman-over-exclusion-from-secret-meeting/comment-page-2/#comment-434815</link>
		<dc:creator>FreeinTX</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 13:54:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=2569#comment-434815</guid>
		<description>&quot;The very word &quot;secrecy&quot; is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it.&quot; - John F. Kennedy

Is CNN running with this story?  Does anyone know?

The very word TREASON comes to mind here.

FreeinTX</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The very word &#8220;secrecy&#8221; is repugnant in a free and open society; and we are as a people inherently and historically opposed to secret societies, to secret oaths and to secret proceedings. We decided long ago that the dangers of excessive and unwarranted concealment of pertinent facts far outweighed the dangers which are cited to justify it.&#8221; &#8211; John F. Kennedy</p>
<p>Is CNN running with this story?  Does anyone know?</p>
<p>The very word TREASON comes to mind here.</p>
<p>FreeinTX</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jessie</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/press-let-rip-at-obama-spokesman-over-exclusion-from-secret-meeting/comment-page-2/#comment-434579</link>
		<dc:creator>Jessie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 04:16:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=2569#comment-434579</guid>
		<description>No not the guy that works for the DOT...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No not the guy that works for the DOT&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jj</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/press-let-rip-at-obama-spokesman-over-exclusion-from-secret-meeting/comment-page-2/#comment-434535</link>
		<dc:creator>jj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Jun 2008 02:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=2569#comment-434535</guid>
		<description>Hillary or Obama were never at DildoBerg. Hill and Obama had a private meeting at the home of Dianne Feinstein in the Spring Valley neighborhood of Washington.

Alex was ‘assuming’ and you know what that does. He’s got no credibility b/c of his paranoia. If he wasn’t making so much money out of ‘crying wolf,’ he might actually give a shit, but he doesn’t. Infowars have many ‘red pills’ that lead to nowhere. He is a false Messiah and you are still trapped in the Matrix.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hillary or Obama were never at DildoBerg. Hill and Obama had a private meeting at the home of Dianne Feinstein in the Spring Valley neighborhood of Washington.</p>
<p>Alex was ‘assuming’ and you know what that does. He’s got no credibility b/c of his paranoia. If he wasn’t making so much money out of ‘crying wolf,’ he might actually give a shit, but he doesn’t. Infowars have many ‘red pills’ that lead to nowhere. He is a false Messiah and you are still trapped in the Matrix.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T.L.</title>
		<link>http://www.infowars.com/press-let-rip-at-obama-spokesman-over-exclusion-from-secret-meeting/comment-page-2/#comment-434363</link>
		<dc:creator>T.L.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 23:23:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.infowars.com/?p=2569#comment-434363</guid>
		<description>&quot;Same with Hillary. Both are technically not members of the CFR&quot; 

Actually that&#039;s not accurate at all. They have two kinds of membership lists. A public one for morons who believe lies, and an internal ones only for certain members. Also Obama IS a member. So hopefully people see through the bullshit and stop perpetuating lies. Is it no wonder obama refused to say he is not a member, but instead answered the question &quot;I dont know if Im an &quot;official&quot; member&quot;. Its funny that someone can blatantly answer a question in such a vague way in order to avoid lying (just in case someone has proof, which there is proof out there if you are willing to look) and everyone will actually believe he not only told the truth, but actually answered the question directly which he did not. Wow, pay close attention to the language used when someone answers a question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Same with Hillary. Both are technically not members of the CFR&#8221; </p>
<p>Actually that&#8217;s not accurate at all. They have two kinds of membership lists. A public one for morons who believe lies, and an internal ones only for certain members. Also Obama IS a member. So hopefully people see through the bullshit and stop perpetuating lies. Is it no wonder obama refused to say he is not a member, but instead answered the question &#8220;I dont know if Im an &#8220;official&#8221; member&#8221;. Its funny that someone can blatantly answer a question in such a vague way in order to avoid lying (just in case someone has proof, which there is proof out there if you are willing to look) and everyone will actually believe he not only told the truth, but actually answered the question directly which he did not. Wow, pay close attention to the language used when someone answers a question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
