 |
|
|
|||
 |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
 |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
States Can Tell Feds to Shove It
- Text size
Sheriff Richard Mack (Ret.)
Infowars.com
January 26, 2010
By now we have all heard the cliches and seen the posters from the “Tea Parties” espousing freedom, less government, and perhaps most of all, how the federal government had better back off trying to shove their national health care down our otherwise healthy throats. The truth of the matter is all the slogans of “Don’t Tread On Me” or “Give Me Liberty Or Give Me Death” or “We’re Mad As Hell And We’re Not Taking It Anymore,” don’t mean a thing when compared to the real and actual answer to all the protests, marches, and outrage.
The marching on Washington and pleas and protests to our DC politicians are misdirected.
The answer is in our own backyards! The States can stop every bit of it! That’s right, the individual States can stop “Obamacare” and all other forms of out-of-control federal government mandates and “big brother” tactics. If Arizona, Hawaii, New Hampshire, Texas, etc. want nothing to do with National Health care as proposed by Barack Obama or Congress, then all they have to do is say “No!”
For you skeptics…let’s look at the law. First, the U.S. Constitution is the ultimate and supreme law of the land. More specifically, the Bill of Rights was established, because some of our Founding Fathers, feared that the Constitution did not go far enough in restricting or limiting the central government.
Hamilton was one of a select few who wanted a bigger and powerful federal government. However, several key states and powerful delegates such as Patrick Henry, said they would not support the formation of a new government if the Constitution did not contain a Bill of Rights, a supreme law to establish basic and fundamental human rights that could never, for
all future American generations, be violated, altered or encroached upon by government. So the Framers of our Constitution came up with ten; ten God-given freedoms that would forever be held inviolable by our own governments.
The last of these basic foundational principles was the one to protect the power, sovereignty, and the autonomy of the States; the Tenth Amendment. This amendment and law underscores the entire purpose of the Constitution to limit government and forbids the federal government from becoming more powerful than the “creator.”
Let’s be very clear here; the States in this case were the creator. They formed the federal government, not the other way around. Does anyone believe rationally that the States intended to form a new central government to control and command the States at will? Nothing could be further from the truth. Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution details what duties the federal government will be responsible for under our new system of “balanced power.” Anything not mentioned in Article 1, Sec. 8, is “reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” (Tenth Amendment) Hence, the federal government was not allowed creativity or carte blanche to expand or assume power wherever and whenever they felt like it. The feds had only discrete and enumerated and very limited powers. Omnipotency was the last thing the Founding Fathers intended to award the newly formed federal government. They had just fought the
Revolutionary War to stop such from Britain and their main concern was to prevent a recurrence here in America.
In perhaps the most recent and powerful Tenth Amendment decision in modern history, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Mack/Printz v U.S. that “States are not subject to federal direction.” But today’s federal Tories argue that the “supremacy clause” of the U.S. Constitution says that the federal government is supreme and thus, trumps the States in all
matters. Wrong! The supremacy clause is dealt with in Mack/Printz, in which the Supreme Court stated once and for all that the only thing “supreme” is the constitution itself. Our constitutional system of checks and balances certainly did not make the federal government king over the states, counties, and cities. Justice Scalia opined for the majority in Mack/Printz, that “Our citizens would have two political capacities, one state and one federal, each protected from incursion by the other.”
- A d v e r t i s e m e n t
or municipal authorities form distinct and independent portions of the Supremacy, no more subject within their respective spheres, to the general authority than the general authority is subject to them, within its own sphere.” The point to remember here is; where do we define the “sphere” of the federal government? That’s right; in Article 1, Section 8 of the Constitution and anything not found within this section belongs to the States or to the People.
So where does health care belong? The last place it belongs is with the President or Congress. It is NOT their responsibility and the States need to make sure that Obama does not overstep his authority.
Just in case there is any doubt as to what the Supreme Court meant, let’s take one more look at Mack/Printz. “This separation of the two spheres is one of the Constitution’s structural protections of liberty. Hence, a double security arises to the rights of the people. The different governments will control each other…” What? The Constitution, the supreme law of the land,
has as a “structural protection of liberty” that States will keep the federal government in check? No wonder it was called a system of “checks and balances.”
The States (and Counties) are to maintain the balance of power by keeping the feds within their proper sphere. So do the States have to take the bullying of the federal government? Not hardly! The States do not have to take or support or pay for Obamacare or anything else from Washington DC.
The States are not subject to federal direction. They are sovereign and “The Constitution protects us from our own best intentions.” (Mack/Printz) Which means the States can tell national health care proposals or laws to take a flying leap off the Washington monument. We are not subject to federal direction!
In the final order pursuant to the Mack/Printz ruling Scalia warned, “The federal government may neither, issue directives requiring the States to address particular problems, nor command the States’ officers, or those of their political subdivisions, to administer or enforce a federal regulatory program. Such commands are fundamentally incompatible with our
constitutional system of dual sovereignty.” It is rather obvious that nationalized health care definitely qualifies as a “federal regulatory program.”
Thus, the marching on Washington and pleas and protests to our DC politicians are misdirected. Such actions are “pie in the sky” dreaming that somehow expects the tyrants who created the tyranny, will miraculously put a stop to it. Throughout the history of the world such has never been the case. Tyrants have never stopped their own corrupt ways. However, in our system of “dual sovereignty,” the States can do it. If we are to take back America and keep this process peaceful, then state and local officials will have to step up to the plate.
Doing so is what States’ Rights and State Sovereignty are all about.
-
- Social bookmarks
- Email this article
-
- Print this page
- Share on Twitter
January 26th, 2010 at 11:32 am
Hey ed., if you’re going to chop up the paragraphs, get it right. That was a tough read with all the cut offs, etc.
Reply
Huxley Reply:
January 26th, 2010 at 2:26 pm
I agree…but that’s what Jefferson Davis thought too.
Reply
MadMax Reply:
January 26th, 2010 at 4:18 pm
Unfortunately, that is sometimes the ultimate cost of liberty. Hopefully the angry populace will realize that the true enemies are the domestic ones that reside within the Beltway and any uncivil actions should be directed at them.
Reply
Outrage Reply:
January 27th, 2010 at 6:27 am
Sure, state governments can tell the feds to shove it. But We the People have the power to tell ALL the governments, federal, state & local, to shove it! How, you ask? How about a NATIONAL STRIKE. We pick a day and EVERYONE STAYS HOME! A simple, non-violent act of revolution. Deny the beast a day of “food”, our government taxes and corporate profits. Will it kill the beast? No, but it will tell the beast We the People are the master and IT SERVES US!
As for a date for a National, General Strike, I like:
1. May 29, the date of Patrick Henery’s “If This Be Treason” speech
2. June 21, the date the Constitution was retified.
3. Sept. 17, the date the Constitution was written.
Think about a strike. Do something, even if it’s just staying home and playing with your children for a day. Don’t just bitch about the situation.
Reply
John Galt Reply:
January 27th, 2010 at 2:13 pm
Good luck with that. I have said that countless times here and other forums but few listen. I’ve tried for the last two years to get people to understand that one of our most powerful options is E-C-O-N-O-M-I-C. I think one day strike would show solidarity amongst us but is far short of the upper punch the assholes in washington need to really get their attention. The strike must last at least a week. Talk to your fellow workers. Then it is a cascade of economical troubles given to the fed and state. No pay checks no direct deposit and the bank kiting your money, no FICA, no SS, no Medicare, no sales taxes. No workie no gas, no food, no restaurants, no pizza, no theater. Just time with the family at home. Stock up and stay home. Call in to work pissed off if you have a job.
Pick a date any date but do something or QUITYERBITCHIN!!!!
John Galt Reply:
January 27th, 2010 at 2:20 pm
Pick a date, I’m ready.
Hows April 19th. The battle of Lexington and Concord.
Outrage Reply:
January 27th, 2010 at 3:07 pm
John G,
No ned to hurt ourselves with a week long strike. How about 6 one day strikes? Even a single day of reduced revenue would have TPTB sputtering! What would a day in April, May, June, July, August & September do to their pointy little heads?
de obvious Reply:
January 27th, 2010 at 6:12 pm
How about April 15?
Janice Boone Reply:
January 28th, 2010 at 4:32 pm
I like your idea. With your permission, I would like to copy this article and your blog. I will circulate this to a few people and see what kind of response I get. Government in any form will not help us, only themselves. WE THE PEOPLE are the only ones who can and will make a difference. Awaiting your reply.
williamwallace Reply:
January 27th, 2010 at 7:00 am
I agree you guys might want to take a look at the back of your birth certificate on the true copy there is a set of red numbers on the back that is how the government writes checks to hati and to the IMF we are the collateral from this country going bankrupt in 1933. That is why to gold was taken. Its not in fort Knox but that is where the salted gold is today to make it look like we have any left. Our labor pays taxes that goes all to the bankers AKA the fed. our ss# is our government employee number to the treasury account with an unlimited amount of credit. 9 digit account numbers 9 digit ss# call a stock broker like fiedelity or meryl lynch with the brith cretificate # and see if I am lying. you PERSON or strawman is being sold into slavery. Hence you are not sovereign untill you official devorce him. Visit http://www.thinkfree.ca for more info on individual sovereignty our only hope if the states dont stand up.
Reply
Steven Reply:
January 27th, 2010 at 9:06 am
I believe you are correct Sir. “If I fight with you, do I get to kill the British?” ha
Yes, we must stand, William is a good man and will stand with us who wish to fight when our liberties are under tyrant control. They have our slave backs to the wall.
GABRIAL (death) Reply:
January 27th, 2010 at 1:18 pm
http://www.1215.org/lawnotes/lawnotes/sovreign.htm
SOVEREIGNTY OF THE PEOPLE
The concept of sovereignty stands on its own. The sources shown below may help you to see that it is a respected and valid concept.
“…at the Revolution, the sovereignty devolved on the people; and they are truly the sovereigns of the country, but they are sovereigns without subjects…with none to govern but themselves; the citizens of America are equal as fellow citizens, and as joint tenants in the sovereignty.” CHISHOLM v. GEORGIA (US) 2 Dall 419, 454, 1 L Ed 440, 455 @DALL 1793 pp471-472
The people of this State, as the successors of its former sovereign, are entitled to all the rights which formerly belonged to the King by his prerogative. Through the medium of their Legislature they may exercise all the powers which previous to the Revolution could have been exercised either by the King alone, or by him in conjunction with his Parliament; subject only to those restrictions which have been imposed by the Constitution of this State or of the U.S.
Lansing v. Smith, 21 D. 89., 4 Wendel 9 (1829) (New York)
“D.” = Decennial Digest
Lansing v. Smith, 4 Wend. 9 (N.Y.) (1829), 21 Am.Dec. 89
10C Const. Law Sec. 298; 18 C Em.Dom. Sec. 3, 228;
37 C Nav.Wat. Sec. 219; Nuls Sec. 1`67; 48 C Wharves Sec. 3, 7.
NOTE: Am.Dec.=American Decision, Wend. = Wendell (N.Y.)
California Government Code Sections 11120 and 54950 contain strong statements about the sovereignty of the people.
CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 11120 et seq.
11120. It is the public policy of this state that public agencies exist to aid in the conduct of the people’s business and the proceedings of public agencies be conducted openly so that the public may remain informed.
In enacting this article the Legislature finds and declares that it is the intent of the law that actions of state agencies be taken openly and that their deliberation be conducted openly.
The people of this state do not yield their sovereignty to the agencies which serve them. The people, in delegating authority, do not give their public servants the right to decide what is good for the people to know and what is not good for them to know. The people insist on remaining informed so that they may retain control over the instruments they have created.
This article shall be known and may be cited as the Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act.
CALIFORNIA GOVERNMENT CODE
SECTION 54950 et seq.
54950. In enacting this chapter, the Legislature finds and declares that the public commissions, boards and councils and the other public agencies in this State exist to aid in the conduct of the people’s business. It is the intent of the law that their actions be taken openly and that their deliberations be conducted openly.
The people of this State do not yield their sovereignty to the agencies which serve them. The people, in delegating authority, do not give their public servants the right to decide what is good for the people to know and what is not good for them to know. The people insist on remaining informed so that they may retain control over the instruments they have created.
54950.5. This chapter shall be known as the Ralph M. Brown Act.
GABRIAL (death) Reply:
January 27th, 2010 at 1:20 pm
http://www.1215.org/lawnotes/lawnotes/supvinf.htm
A court of record is a “superior court.”
A court not of record is an “inferior court.”
“Inferior courts” are those whose jurisdiction is limited and special and whose proceedings are not according to the course of the common law.” Ex Parte Kearny, 55 Cal. 212; Smith v. Andrews, 6 Cal. 652
Criminal courts proceed according to statutory law. Jurisdiction and procedure is defined by statute. Likewise, civil courts and admiralty courts proceed according to statutory law. Any court proceeding according to statutory law is not a court of record (which only proceeds according to common law); it is an inferior court.
“The only inherent difference ordinarily recognized between superior and inferior courts is that there is a presumption in favor of the validity of the judgments of the former, none in favor of those of the latter, and that a superior court may be shown not to have had power to render a particular judgment by reference to its record. Ex parte Kearny, 55 Cal. 212. Note, however, that in California ‘superior court’ is the name of a particular court. But when a court acts by virtue of a special statute conferring jurisdiction in a certain class of cases, it is a court of inferior or limited jurisdiction for the time being, no matter what its ordinary status may be. Heydenfeldt v. Superior Court, 117 Cal. 348, 49 Pac. 210; Cohen v. Barrett, 5 Cal. 195” 7 Cal. Jur. 579
The decisions of a superior court may only be challenged in a court of appeal.
The decisions of an inferior court are subject to collateral attack. In other words, in a superior court one may sue an inferior court directly, rather than resort to appeal to an appelate court.
GABRIAL (death) Reply:
January 27th, 2010 at 1:21 pm
Decision of a court of record may not be appealed.
It is binding on ALL other courts.
However, no statutory or constitutional court (whether it be an appellate or supreme court) can second guess the judgment of a court of record. “The judgment of a court of record whose jurisdiction is final, is as conclusive on all the world as the judgment of this court would be. It is as conclusive on this court as it is on other courts. It puts an end to inquiry concerning the fact, by deciding it.” Ex parte Watkins, 3 Pet., at 202-203. [cited by SCHNECKLOTH v. BUSTAMONTE, 412 U.S. 218, 255 (1973)]
COUNTER CLAIM NOTES
http://www.1215.org/lawnotes/l.....mnotes.htm
rebel93 Reply:
January 26th, 2010 at 5:47 pm
Jefferson Davis was a saint compared to Obama!
Reply
SPIRTBLADE Reply:
January 27th, 2010 at 5:40 am
[ I AM A BIG FAT VIRGIN LOSER ]
[I HATE MYSELF SO SO MUCH ]
I AM [ POWERLESS TO CONTROL THESE EMOTIONS ]
I AM JESUS – YOU [ SINNERS ] WILL [ BURN ]
[ ARM UP AND KILL EACH OTHER ]
Reply
NEPHILIM COMING!!!! Reply:
January 27th, 2010 at 2:56 pm
At some point and time somthing will happen where the Satanist will say ,ok we cannot go by the constitution because of the impending doom of what ever,ok just because they have money that is what gives them the right to rule,what about theres a hell of a lot more of us than there is of you,and at least 4 million with weapons,yes the Nephilim are getting ready to do the great Christian and Jewish round up again,nibirupedia.com
Reply
buck Reply:
January 26th, 2010 at 2:46 pm
acn oyu dunerstand htis? ewll hten htis owuld eb a ahrd erad uhh?
(gap!! uh-oh where do I read now?)
did I lose you in that little gap? well the words keep coming and all you have to do is look for the next word,
(still going) gaps don’t matter to the rest of us lol because we can get the message. I’m sorry you’ve been flourided but leave the messangers alone and get the message, cause that’s all that mattters.
Reply
Mad Hatter Reply:
January 27th, 2010 at 11:41 am
Thank you Sheriff Mack, I think you are spot on with your take on this. REDIRECT ALL RALLIES TO YOUR STATE CAPITAL. It’s cheaper and closer to home too!
I agree with the above comment to the editor, broken paragraphs are bad.
Reply
January 26th, 2010 at 11:34 am
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xQst_wp4zdo
redskelton god bless him it is law STAN’ UP
OATH KEEPERS of the US Constitution). Protect our Sovereignty, Bill of Rights and US Constitution with the Declaration of Independence. Tear this Oligarchy/Democracy abomination down and restore the Republic. We the People call all OATH KEEPERS to protect our original sacred documents of Liberty and Freedom. Our government violates our Rights as they illegally make unjust laws to enslave us. Protect Our Sovereignty
Reply
January 26th, 2010 at 11:36 am
The states [SUPERCEDE] the nation.
The COUNTIES, supercede the states.
The County Sheriff [SUPERCEDES] the forkin’ PRESIDENT.
Right-here in Ward, our town-charter [SUPERCEDES] the LAWS of the NATION, and the STATE.
[ARM-UP, SPREAD - OUT]
Reply
SPIRITBLADE Reply:
January 26th, 2010 at 11:37 am
Die [FREE].
(or)
Die a [SLAVE].
Your call.
Reply
GayBladeCux Reply:
January 26th, 2010 at 1:37 pm
Go smoke some more opium gayboy thumper.
Reply
January 26th, 2010 at 11:37 am
Sounds good. The problem being, the states lost “Sovereignty”, in 1865.
How many states have the stones to stand up to the big money feds ??
Let me know, I’ll move there…….
Reply
williamwallace Reply:
January 27th, 2010 at 7:17 am
I second that …. That is why we have to the the authority that word comes from 2 separite words uttered for the kings of old and the pope the author of the writs or author/ity to the one who declairs the writ. A writ is a letter or statement something usually demanding. Seriously we need to learn how to craft letters of understanding and intent and place a given time for them to rebut it or accept it or silence is their acceptance. use certified mail and get it return recept. and make sure you be friend the notery republic they are the joker in this game.
Reply
January 26th, 2010 at 11:51 am
At least 8 states have already started writing nullification language for when this is passed. Debra Medina came to my area week before last and said she spoke with a state rep in OK who says he knows of 5 more involved in this movement. Her question was why isn’t Texas leading this charge? Why isn’t our 10th amendment touting governor advocating this exact same thing? Because he really isn’t opposed. But yes, urge your state reps to start writing nullifcation language now. This way, the healthcare bill is DOA. Or even before.
Reply
Mad Hatter Reply:
January 27th, 2010 at 11:45 am
Sorry, Rick Perry is nothing more than a weasel and a politician (my apologies to weasels). He is so dirty that pigs make fun of him. He is so two faced he has four eyeballs.
Reply
January 26th, 2010 at 11:56 am
The police will arrest you for speaking out, good luck surviving in prison. They the prisons are starving inmates to death.
Reply
SPIRITBLADE Reply:
January 26th, 2010 at 12:20 pm
Suffer-not arrest.
Reply
January 26th, 2010 at 12:02 pm
Ok with the article, and it applies to all countries, but the states, provinces and towns have been corrupted by central governments.
Reply
Mad Hatter Reply:
January 27th, 2010 at 11:46 am
Right, Good luck getting the states to do something when they live off earmarks and federal programs.
Reply
January 26th, 2010 at 12:06 pm
the state workers are the next fed workers. They won’t tell them to shove anything.
Reply
Mad Hatter Reply:
January 27th, 2010 at 11:47 am
Police in my state have already been federalized. That means they follow Federal laws and take Federal Money and they will be loyal to the Federal Government under the auspices of the various so called “fusion centers.”
Reply
January 26th, 2010 at 12:25 pm
Mack is spot on. We have to re-empower our sheriffs, the first line of defense to keep the Feds out.
Don’t be fooled into taking Federal grants, all those new toys come with strings attached..
YOUR FREEDOM
Reply
January 26th, 2010 at 12:41 pm
Offical Notice to all USA-Citizens-As Quoted-in above Article–All statesHave the Lawfull rights-To Say NO_NO_NO_To obamas very very-pushy Additude-On Health Care–& Spending Money Thats not There!!We Will never_NEVER-get out of the Trillions of $$$-that we in the red-The Only Way would Be if All the multi millionaires Of the USA-Were Made to Give Millions to the People–Not the Governmen–Thay would just line their pockets with it(the Goverment)-As for health care–We have Health care–But Very Truthfully–The Doctors of the USA-Take all the money–Have you ever seen a Doctor Drive around in a Old broken down car–NEVER!!Have you ever seen a DOCTOR LIVE in a SHACK–oR A tINY TRAILOR–!!??Thay ALL-are very rich!!But now they are scared–Thay are going to lose alot of That easy money!!
Reply
January 26th, 2010 at 1:30 pm
Organized banking is satanic. Its leaders are at best killers rapist thieves. Noble ones take charge of your own banking affars. Pray for the distruction of organized banking. Our lieing lackie goverment is satanic minions of organized banker’s.
Reply
January 26th, 2010 at 2:22 pm
And now your moment of zen.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mfPyIvR40GM
Reply
Mad Hatter Reply:
January 27th, 2010 at 11:54 am
I’m sure they will make this a crime. Of course everything is a crime now…
Reply
January 26th, 2010 at 2:30 pm
“If we are to take back America and keep this process peaceful, then state and local officials will have to step up to the plate.”
That’s why the Jews are snapping up state and local government positions as fast as they can!
The New World Order is a Jewish led conspiracy that was conceived of, and established, by Mayer Amschel Rothschild – the first of the Rothschilds (Rothschild means Red Shield in German). The Rothschilds are the eye of the pyramid…no one has greater authority in the NWO than the Rothschilds.
The Rothschilds command all other Jews through the Sayanim Network. A Sayanim is a Jewish person, that can be called on to assist another Jew in any cause. Since birth, the Jewish people have been taught of their superiority and need for cohesion. The Sephardic Jews are the upper level of the network, and the Ashkenazim, which constitute 95% of all Jews, are the worker ants. Since the Sephardics first converted the Ashkenazim, they brainwashed them into the idea that the world is their enemy, but their fellow Jew is a “Quiet Guardian”.
The Sayanim Network includes thousands of police officers, detectives, judges, lawyers, city council members, activists of every stripe: peace/truth/anti-gov/pro-abortion etc., accountants, Mayors/Senators/Congressmen/Governors, military officers, and Directors of Homeland Security!
The New World Order IS the Jews!
Reply
god says Reply:
January 26th, 2010 at 9:20 pm
OK ADOLF HITLER
Reply
Mad Hatter Reply:
January 27th, 2010 at 11:55 am
It is NOT a “Jewish” conspiracy, it is a world wide conspiracy with every race playing a role. Get a FN clue or STFU race baiter.
Reply
January 26th, 2010 at 3:58 pm
The only laws a sheriff has to obey is the constitution period.You may have heard about CSU in colorado banning guns on campus.The students are planning to sue.The sheriff of laimer county says he will not enforce this and will not jail any student who shows up at school with a gun.You can read about this in the news paper,Fort collins Coloradoan Jan.26,2010.Of course this is the ballon boy sheriff.But I know this sheriff and he is the real deal…
Reply
January 26th, 2010 at 6:59 pm
“States Can Tell Feds to Shove It”
That’s the winning spirit.
Reply
January 26th, 2010 at 7:08 pm
There is nothing the states can do. The states are the fed’s bitches. They don’t do what the fed tells them to do, or they get no fed funds. So if the fed tells the states to take away your rights, they will.
Reply
January 26th, 2010 at 7:40 pm
Yeah , shove the interest rates up the deficit !!!
P.S. That’s how it’s done !!!
Reply
January 26th, 2010 at 9:25 pm
THE STATES DO NOT HAVE TO GIVE THE FEDERALS NOTHING, THE STATE SHOULD NOT HAVE TO SEND THE FEDERALS $100 JUST TO GET BACK $1 IF I WAS GOVERNOR I WOULD TEL THE FEDS TO f--- OFF AND IF THE FEDS TRYED TO INVADE, WELL THEN CALL ON ALL SHARRIFFS TO FORM POSSEES AND ACTIVATE THE GUARD TO REPELL THE INVADERS.
Reply
Mad Hatter Reply:
January 27th, 2010 at 11:57 am
that is assuming “their” guard isn’t in IRAQ.
Reply
January 26th, 2010 at 10:24 pm
If the people of today in any decent percentage actually figure this out and are willing to fight like the rebs did…Washington and the NWO are a footnote in history,people are waiting for a state(s) to get a spine and rebel and theyll go there.
Reply
January 26th, 2010 at 10:40 pm
The NWO talking heads on radio call TEA Party members 911 truther kooks!
The TEA Party needs to survive but it’s getting HIJACKED!!
LET’s GO TEA PARTY!!!
HANG TOUGH!!! FIGHT THE GOOD FIGHT FOR AMERICA’s CHILDREN AND FUTURE!!!!!
Reply
January 27th, 2010 at 12:17 am
Do something for your children besides entertain them with mindless fluff, you arrogant, lazy, disgusting AMERICAN PIGS!!!!! Teach them how to SURVIVE in the future you fuks have created for them…
Reply
Mad Hatter Reply:
January 27th, 2010 at 11:58 am
STFU idiot. Millions of American take good care of their children.
Reply
January 27th, 2010 at 12:27 am
My God when I read articles like this at times I wish I had been born an American citizen.
The American Constitution and the Bill of Rights are without a doubt two of the most profoundly important and relevant documents ever written by humankind. They stand alone as testament to the rights and evolutionary progress of individuals and society. That they are trampled as such by an elite who cares not and therefore subjugates the very people these documents were written on behalf of in order to protect against it, well, it is all truly heartwrenching for me.
I pray that reason will win the day but I know better of it.
In the end America will revolt and blood will spill however “Storms make oaks take deeper roots” and out of it all a true democracy will flourish once again.
Reply
January 27th, 2010 at 12:29 am
Too bad none of the dreams on here will work cause they have all been bought! Just calling it like I see it!
Reply
Mad Hatter Reply:
January 27th, 2010 at 11:59 am
Then you are FN blind. There are lots of places that your words apply, but there are lots of places that they don’t.
Reply
January 27th, 2010 at 12:54 am
Their is nothing any of you can do, besides love your family and get right with God & the universe. Peace be with you and I hope Jesus is kind to you during the Great Rapture.
Reply
Aussie Reply:
January 27th, 2010 at 6:58 am
Rapture my arse!!!
Reply
Mad Hatter Reply:
January 27th, 2010 at 12:00 pm
There is NO pre-tribulation rapture. That is a fiction created by protestant practitioners of priestcraft. Read the Bible, The Entire Bible.
Reply
January 27th, 2010 at 3:13 am
When can you get info on when one of these are going on? I want to go so bad
Reply
January 27th, 2010 at 6:57 am
Sheriff Richard Mack (Ret.):
There is no law you idiot!
There is only control…manipulation, deceit and lies!
There is no law…the Globalist filth have seen to that!!!
Reply
Mad Hatter Reply:
January 27th, 2010 at 12:01 pm
Hey you guys are the ones that gave up your guns without a fight so feel free to STFU Aussie.
Reply
January 27th, 2010 at 9:09 am
What if the rapture occurs in 2015? Are you ready to suffer and fight the next 5 years? I have faith, but I start my own car, eat my own food, shoot my own guns. God is not a magician or a Genie that you can order around to your time table. It is His will, not ours.
Reply
Mad Hatter Reply:
January 27th, 2010 at 12:02 pm
Read the Bible, there is NO pre-tribulation rapture – better be prepared to suffer like Christ if you want to hang out with him afterwards…
Reply
January 27th, 2010 at 12:21 pm
Rothschild says…Recycling old Technology….For a New World Order…???…http://www.youtube.com/user/322skull#p/f
Reply
January 27th, 2010 at 12:58 pm
Rothschild says…What is old is new again…or A Nuncio….??? http://www.youtube.com/user/32.....rMcBHGMZzc
Reply
January 27th, 2010 at 1:21 pm
Rothschild says…More of what you ……….Won’t see anytime soon…???.. …………. http://www.youtube.com/user/32.....9iHAu_zWU4
Reply
January 27th, 2010 at 3:17 pm
The Fed. has the authority is been given. When it exceeds that authority it looses legal authority to enforce.
The State through the authority of the people created the Fed. and is superior to the FED. The States retain those powers not delegated to the Fed.
“Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.”
When the Fed. and the State exceed their authority or fail to faithfully execute their delegated Constitutional responsibilities. The power reverts to the people. It is the obligation of the sovereign originators of authority (the people) who have reserved our power to enforce and live by the law.
Reply
January 29th, 2010 at 12:58 am
zox85v niopfeskljkd, [url=http://ugmjzsqlfjsb.com/]ugmjzsqlfjsb[/url], [link=http://tbqezsachkix.com/]tbqezsachkix[/link], http://uyyveqvryafk.com/
Reply