 |
 |
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
|
|||
 |
|||
|
|||
 |
|||
|
The BBC Believes In 9/11 Conspiracy Theories
- Text size
Lee Rogers
Rogue Government
July 8, 2008
|
|
 |
|
| The bottom line is that there were news reports stating that WTC-7 had collapsed before the event took place meaning that the most likely explanation is that the building was brought down in a controlled demolition. | |
The BBC which just recently aired a hit piece on people asking questions about the events of 9/11, also posted an editorial by Mike Rudin on their web site attempting again to rationalize how they managed to report that WTC-7 had collapsed before the building actually fell. WTC-7 is the third building that collapsed on September 11th, 2001 at approximately 5:20 PM EST despite the fact that no plane crashed into the building. Amazingly, BBC reporter Jane Standley reported on the building’s collapse even though WTC-7 clearly stood in the New York City skyline while she gave her report. The editorial claims that the BBC received incorrect information from Reuters which lead them to report this news in advance of the collapse. Rudin doesn’t even question how this supposedly erroneous news report from Reuters managed to accurately predict a future event. As a professional journalist, Rudin should know full well that this warrants further investigation. A statement Rudin quotes from Reuters has them citing a local news story as the original source of information but he doesn’t even bother to follow up and find the original source. According to Rudin, it is enough just to say that Reuters incorrectly reported the story even though this fails to answer a ton of questions. The bottom line is that there were news reports stating that WTC-7 had collapsed before the event took place meaning that the most likely explanation is that the building was brought down in a controlled demolition. It is impossible to predict that a building is going to collapse before it does unless it is brought down intentionally. Not only that, but the building came down in 6.5 seconds at close to the speed of gravity, had light fire damage prior to its collapse and there is no historical precedent for a building to collapse in its own footprint due to fire damage. Considering that it is impossible to load up a 47-story building with explosives in 7 to 8 hours for the purposes of demolition, explosives had to have been planted in advance indicating certain people had foreknowledge of what was going to happen on that day. Of course, the conspiracy theorists at the BBC are going to do everything in their power to make sure that all information they report fits in line with their 9/11 conspiracy theory that they blindly support.
What’s really interesting about this whole situation is that right when this news came out, the BBC claimed that they lost the video footage of Jane Standley’s report.
Here’s what Richard Porter from the BBC said about the missing tapes back in 2007.
I should also mention the missing tapes. As you’ll see from the details above, the absence of the BBC World tapes hasn’t made much difference to our ability to look back at what happened. We have all the tapes of other BBC channels (and I now know that quite a few of you have your own copies of BBC World, which is an interesting discovery… ).
Some of you find it hard to believe we didn’t keep the BBC World tapes… but we had several streams of news output running simultaneously on the day, both on radio and television as well as online and we have kept all the tapes from BBC News 24 and Radio Five Live, as well as all the BBC One bulletins. Obviously I wish we’d kept hold of the World tapes alongside all the others, but we didn’t… and I don’t know whether they were destroyed or mislaid. But as a result of this week’s events, I have asked our archivists to get hold of copies of our original material from the organisations which do have them.
And just to be clear, the BBC policy is to keep every minute of news channel output for 90 days (in line with the Broadcasting Act in the UK). After that we are obliged to keep a representative sample – and we interpret that to mean roughly one third of all our output. We also keep a large amount of individual items (such as packaged reports or “rushes” – ie original unedited material), which we use for operational reasons – such as when we come to broadcast fresh stories on the subject. We do not lack a historical record of the event.
Amazingly a year later they have managed to find the tapes.
The following is taken from Rudin’s editorial talking about how they finally found them.
 |
|
|
|
|
The mystery of the missing tapes didn’t last that long. One very experienced film librarian kindly agreed to have another look for us one night. There are more than a quarter of a million tapes just in the Fast Store basement at Television Centre. The next morning I got a call to say the tapes had been found. They’d just been put back on the wrong shelf – 2002 rather than 2001. Not so sinister after all.
These people are a bunch of liars. How could Porter say that they didn’t have copies of the original material and a year later, Rudin makes an entirely different excuse saying that the tapes had been misplaced and put on the wrong shelf? Not only that but how does video footage of one of the most important events of the 21st century get misplaced on a shelf designated for 2002 rather than 2001?
The BBC has pretty much admitted that they were being dishonest about the whereabouts of these video tapes, so how can they be trusted to give an unbiased view on the events of 9/11? If they are not being dishonest, than they must be incompetent, take your pick.
Here’s what Rudin said about Reuters being the source of the information they used in Standley’s news report.
It turns out that the respected news agency Reuters picked up an incorrect report and passed it on. They have issued this statement:
“On 11 September 2001 Reuters incorrectly reported that one of the buildings at the New York World Trade Center, 7WTC, had collapsed before it actually did. The report was picked up from a local news story and was withdrawn as soon as it emerged that the building had not fallen.”
Rudin doesn’t even think that it is worth following up on this to find the real source. What sort of journalist would stop there and not dig deeper? The most ridiculous thing about this is that Rudin proves what many have accused the BBC of doing which was reading off of a pre-packaged media script. He admits that the BBC retrieved this information from Reuters which gives validity to what many were saying about this news being planted in advance of the event.
This is just one aspect of the BBC engaging in an incredible amount of deception. As hard as this might be to believe, this is nothing compared to the insane amount of lies and deceit that is packaged in their new documentary “The Third Tower” that attempts to prove the insane conspiracy theory that WTC-7 was brought down due to fire damage. It is so incredibly biased and misleading that several articles if not a small book would be necessary to fully analyze the pathetic debunking attempts. Look for my complete analysis of the documentary shortly.
| Alex Jones’ new documentary TRUTH RISING is now available on DVD at the Infowars store. |
-
- Social bookmarks
- Email this article
-
- Print this page
- Share on Twitter
July 8th, 2008 at 8:24 pm
Lee Rogers states that …”the BBC has pretty much admitted that they were being dishonest about the whereabouts of these video tapes”…. this is completly false.
The article also accuses the BBC of being “a bunch of liars” and bias… gee , this report is so balanced and full of facts maybe the author should be working for the BBC, he seems to display the same twisted writing skills as the people he rants about.
They lost the tape, they hid the tape…so what, there are copies all over youtube !!
Another “infowar’ storm in a teacup using the same slanted journalism that apparently they’re so against..
don’t forget to buy the dvd’s people
July 8th, 2008 at 8:24 pm
dam jews
fightingirishcoward Reply:
January 30th, 2009 at 7:20 pm
there were more jews that tried to get to the bottom of the JFK assassination then JFK’s own Irish people. i even did my talk in 8th grade english class back in “66″ about how zapruder’s camera acted as a timing device, that proved 1 person couldn’t have fired that many shots in the number of frames that elapsed on the film. i was 12 yrs old. the irish never questioned a dahm thing about the 1st irish-american president’s assasination, especially in boston which is a irish city and the kennedy’s birthplace. you guys are cowards afraid to take on the neo-cons. instead you go after easy pickn’s like the jews. kennedy was my hero and his head was blown off in open daylight. come on jew hater comment on it. you don’t have the balls. btw, mark lane, author plausible denial, rush to judgement is jewish.
July 8th, 2008 at 8:25 pm
Directly before this hit piece was broadcast there was an advert for BBC Radio 3/4 (?), in which Kofi Annan says we should unite as a world, the world should united to fight terrorism.
July 8th, 2008 at 8:27 pm
Directly before this hit piece was aired there was an advert for BBC Radio, in which Kofi Annan says the world should be united as one in fight against terrorism
July 8th, 2008 at 8:28 pm
Directly before this hit piece was aired there was an advert for BBC Radio, in which Kofi Annan says the world should be united as one in fight against terrorism…psychologically preparing the viewer…
July 8th, 2008 at 8:38 pm
that show pissed me off forreal
July 8th, 2008 at 8:46 pm
Check out http://www.documentarywire.com to watch 100’s of documentaries for free!
July 8th, 2008 at 8:57 pm
There’s also an interesting statement in the BBC shlockumentary by a fire deputy where he says that someone at the NYFD advised him that the building might last another 5 hours.
Hmmmmmmm????? (big raised eyebrow)
Oh really?? That’s quite a statement to make. That’s a pretty special person that can assess a randomly damaged and partially burning 47 storey building and not only conlude that it WILL indeed fall (a totally unprecedented event unlike any building before it), but estimate in how many hours, like a doctor making a terminal prognosis! HAHAHA.
Another omniscient being?! Just assessed the total situation, amidst all the chaos, all the beam, column, joint conditions. Concluded she’s got maybe 5 hours left.
THAT’S BRUCE WILLIS FANTASY MOVIE STUFF MR. LOISEAU!
Who said that, and how did they come to that conclusion? And why aren’t they answering questions under oath before a jury of their peers?
July 8th, 2008 at 9:01 pm
If anyone saw the conspiracy files on the bbc recently you can see the blatent evasion of many key issues such as the structural steel being able to withstand the heat of office fires for many hours before “sagging” which made the building COLLAPSE in the same mannor as a controlled demolition rather than in a uncontrolled toppoling….I’m sure you all know the facts about the steel and the heat of aviation fuel.
the program is a joke used to decieve the trusting british public by building a straw man argument leaving the most important points out of the program completely……I’ve had a few drinks so leave my spelling alone alright?!?!?
July 8th, 2008 at 9:05 pm
I tried to look up the Congressional record to see who was working on the Hill on 9/11. After hours of searching I discovered that Congress was in session but not the Senate. The record of this was also mis dated but I figure it out and saw the records that were being hidden by dating the record incorrectly.
July 8th, 2008 at 9:55 pm
I was wondering if anyone wanted to debate the CD theory with me?
I would like to know what investigations were stopped as a result of the collapse of building 7?
July 8th, 2008 at 9:59 pm
Hey Londoner where the hell were you on 9/11 2001? Oh I forgot you forgot. LIAR. See the the logic is simple Mr. Simple Londoner. If you lost the footage for one of the most important dates at the exact location you are one of three things. 1. A filthy liar. 2. A complete idiot or 3. Both of the above which is you Londoner. HA HA
July 8th, 2008 at 10:08 pm
I just want to refer all of you psycho’s here on Infowars to the Google video: Richard Gage debates Mark Roberts on Hardfire.
July 8th, 2008 at 10:13 pm
you mean the Hardfire where Gage wipes Robert’s nose in his own excrement?
What I dont get is why no one is going off on the Berry Jennings testimony – they blatantly cut that up to make it like the stairwell blew up after the first tower fell. That is clearly NOT what he has stated, and reiterated in interviews a year ago.
July 8th, 2008 at 10:19 pm
um hello, i bet it was the jews who did it. you know collapsed the towers. one of those filthy jews probably sneezed and blew it down with the might of the wind that came from its big filthy nose. ulch!!! they do everything them jews… like ARTS, PHILOSOPHY, MEDICINE AND HEALTH, COMEDY, SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY. Did you thank a jew today?
July 8th, 2008 at 10:38 pm
#13 _ Dan K. Stanley
If your having trouble seeing the forest for the trees, you might find it easier, to take your “blinkers” off.
From A to Z your getting pissed on, and your not even aware of the dampness!
Confucious say: man who get wet from being pissed on…….might have liking for watersports!
My thoughts on the Globalists……….Fk’m.
July 8th, 2008 at 10:50 pm
#11, They ran into some roadblocks when it came to Enron, I heard.
July 8th, 2008 at 10:52 pm
Ryan. If you had a brain cell it would be lonely.
July 8th, 2008 at 11:01 pm
Disinformation agents are trying to overrun the comments and discredit us.
It’s not going to work AT ALL because we have the truth on our side.
TRUTH is coming out and they won’t be able to stop it as long as we don’t give up.
Just more of their lame attempts. LOL @ THEM and BBC. Just keep digging…
July 8th, 2008 at 11:08 pm
Why do we still even have to argue about all of this. It is completely obvious what happened on 9/11. Building 7 and the Pentagon are the smoking gun. This event was either allowed to happen by our own government, planned and carried out by our own government or financed by our own government.
It’s ridiculous, the evidence is so clearly visible it’s just retarded. Building 7. Simple as that.
July 8th, 2008 at 11:12 pm
Why did they wait more than a year before putting the tape into the archive?
I now there is no mention of when they put it into the archive (and lost it),
but it goes without saying that prier to 9/11 2002 that shelf would have been empty,
unless they have a lot of “future” material in their archives
July 8th, 2008 at 11:29 pm
Who cares that these little minnows and guppies are lying about this??? Bigger fish are lying about bigger waters!!! THEY ARE ALL ON THE RUN, DUCKING FOR COVER FROM THE 911 TRUTH MOVEMENT SLEDGEHAMMER!!! I smell New World Order ass gettin’ kicked!!!!
July 8th, 2008 at 11:34 pm
I just saw “911 and the BBC.” They’re making this stuff up and omitting evidence just like “Popular Mechanics.” I’d love to believe that incompetence was the real reason behind these errors, but when they keep changing, discrediting, and reinventing their arguements, it just screams “INSIDE JOB”, name calling is not factual evidence, show me hard evidence and I will believe you, no sequiturs, half truths and outright lies, dishonor the memory of the dead and their familes. How can one make money perpetuating a lie and dishonor grieving family members over and over again. Our politicans are not working for us, it’s time for citizens to take care of their familes and each other. The government, be it Democrat or Republican, is NOT our friend. We’re gonna have to take care of each other or perish at the hands of our government.
July 8th, 2008 at 11:39 pm
Isn’t the BBC funded by the British government? If so, why would anyone expect them to tell the truth about anything?
July 9th, 2008 at 12:00 am
I’m so glad that I read infowars.com just about every day, that way I know not to watch the BBC’s latest propaganda campaign, in the hope of being educated. They’re only discrediting themselves. MI6 will be very disappointed to know that their program didn’t make the grade. Do they think we have no brains or something?
Oh, oh! I have a conspiracy! Maybe they DELIBERATELY made a really sucky documentary, so that we’d waste our time pointing out all the flaws and biased information in it? Damn, they’ve tricked us!
Forget it. Keep burning DVDs and printing flyers and handing them out. Also watch 9/11 Chronicles if you haven’t already.
July 9th, 2008 at 12:10 am
http://youtube.com/watch?v=5Az_7U0-cK0
July 9th, 2008 at 12:13 am
Gulf of Tonkin. Operation Northwoods. USS Liberty attack 1967. 911.
All false flag. All staged yes. But why no mention of the Lavon Affair 1954?
The Lavon Affair better illustrates WHO and HOW is behind these treacherous methods.
In the Lavon Affair of 1954 it was the Jews, yes who set up bombs in US buildings and most important here—THEY WERE CAUGHT LEAVING BEHIND EVIDENCE TO IMPLICATE ARAB/MUSLIMS.
This is their method. This is their MO. They have been doing this kind of thing for centuries. Nothing new. It is in great part why Jews have been thrown out, expelled from 100 countries in history.
So why no mention of the Lavon Affair 1954 Alex? Why not the details of this terrorist attack?
The book “Wrongly Blamed” by American Muslim Dr Kaasem Khaleel proves to me that the MOSSAD did London and Madrid bombings as well as others.
Why doesn’t Alex have Dr Kaasem Khaleel on as guest. Rick Adams on RBN does quite often. Why no mention of the Lavon Affair Alex? You wonder why I and others are suspicious of your purpose?
I knew of who was controlling the US government, their purpose and methods LONG before Alex Jones came on the scene. He has helped fill in a lot of the details yes. But he still fails to identify the real perpetrators.
July 9th, 2008 at 1:11 am
Mike Rudin, you have really shot yourself in the foot with this latest effort at a cover up and after we have chewed you up and spat you out, we’re going after the the big boys.
July 9th, 2008 at 1:21 am
Our American society is set up to punish those who tell the truth, and reward those who lie. Seems like all the blood suckers are running things, from low level government to the top. Its hard just for the little man to keep his job these days, because the pressure on the little person to lie and cheat just to keep thier job is intense. Telling the truth means loss of income for your family, loss of credibility, respect etc…….
My parents raised me to be honest, taught me it was the only way, now life is pretty tough on me. It took me several years to figure out what was going on, I was always behind the eight ball, to naive. I never thought things would be like this, and until I started reading Alex Jones I didnt have a clue.
I’m proud of you people in here, and I like reading your blogs!
July 9th, 2008 at 1:27 am
This P.O.S. channel is funded by the taxpayer, and unless you can prove you don’t own a TV or Radio you are forced under law (At least I think it’s law) to pay around £130 per year to fund it. Their is a growing sentiment in this country that they should be self sufficient now because they are widely seen as a propaganda station for the government. I actually took an hour out of my life to watch this crappy hit piece, I actually had to laugh at some of the “evidence”, you could actually see the dollar bills sticking out of Barry Jennings’ G-String. Trust your own judgment.
July 9th, 2008 at 1:36 am
Has anyone here noticed that the more desperate the dissinformation agents get, the less sense their comments make as they squirm around in their own filthy lies, RYAN and LONDONER. THE TRUTH IS COMING OUT AND THE NEW WORLD ORDER IS GOING DOWN. KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK EVERYONE. GO TO GOOGLE VIDEO AND WATCH ‘BIG BROTHER, THE BIGGER PICTURE’ BRILLIANT STUFF!!!!!!
July 9th, 2008 at 1:37 am
To answer Larry McElhinney’s question, no, the BBC isn’t funded by the British goverment. The BBC is funded through licensing the British public (ie if a member of the public has a TV set, he or she has to pay a mandatory fee to the corporation – the BBC has detector vans to check if the public have a licence or not) which let’s face it is an extra tax for them to pay.
This may seem a pretty stupid system to most people, but what it does mean is that the British public get un-interupted, comercial free and suposedly independant unbaist television service that belongs to the people.
Sadly the ideal I have just described has always been somewhat laughable. After watching a recent speech by John Pilger (a fantastic independant journalist – well worth googling) it seems that the Beeb has always been an expiedient mouthpiece of the goverment or official attitudes. Couple that with the fact that advertisements are now commonplace on BBC websites & programmes – it now places the BBC in the same basket as the likes of Fox & MSNBC.
Sigh! – where have all the good guys gone?
July 9th, 2008 at 1:57 am
Atum – man that Aphex Twin video is pretty scary. I guess you think that this is the true nature of the BBC?
July 9th, 2008 at 2:03 am
To illustrate how much the BBC liars are, they have recently quoted a TV statement concerning the top executives £100,000 bonus payments ” even after the competition phone in scandals, and recent job losses” the BBC undertook a survey of the British public, and found the credibility of the BBC was back to its original level” I LAUGHED WHEN I HEARD IT!
July 9th, 2008 at 2:51 am
A nother lie you may did not notice: Sisson claims that sulphur came
from vapourised gypsum walls. This of cours is ridiculous. You can
not get pure (native form) sulphur from vapourising gypsum. You get
only sulphurdeoxide (which is gas and would be blown away).
July 9th, 2008 at 3:10 am
On the BBC programme Barry Jennings says something like “I never said I saw bodys, that’s a lie” when in fact he says something like “I was told not to look down, I was stepping over bodys, you know when you’re stepping over bodys”. The BBC program does show both.
The BBC are squirming. The programme trys to be all things to all people. Here are the things the programme is trying to be:
1. Fair and balanced view of both sides. This is the surface.
2. A hit peice to placate their masters. What is being attacked on the above article.
3. To show the truth but look like you are being balanced.
The final point 3 is what interests me. Yeah yeah it’s a hit peice but the BBC cannot fail to have discovered the truth. I actually think they want to scream from the roof tops “911 was an inside job” They are squirming because every day it looks like the official theory will fall and they want some distance.
The official theory is like a sky scraper with a fire inside. Rumour has it that it’s only a matter of time until it falls. But will it be due to ‘weakened’ steel or will it be detonated by the BBC itself?
July 9th, 2008 at 3:18 am
I used to tag gang signs in bathroom stalls as a kid, but that shit gets you no where.
Now every surface I get my paws on, I tag: 9/11 was an inside job, google WTC7, abolish the federal reserve, abolish the IRS, because the NWO is the real gang that needz to go down.
The niggaz in my hood prolly shit they pants when they school themselves on the New World Order. They like why couldnt’ we be that gangsta. These white folks in charge of the nwo are straight up gangsta and put of our hustlin shit to shame.
July 9th, 2008 at 3:29 am
We continue to laugh at the mentally challenged commenters of Infowars.
July 9th, 2008 at 3:35 am
I’m not smart or well enough at the moment to do it myself, but would love to see a movie where a hypothetical space alien (but naturalised American) detective is called in by the people to investigate 911. And it then proceeds to treat it like a normal murder investigation, arresting the guys with means, motive and opportunity. Including most especially the obvious suspects like the guys who destroyed tapes and evidence. Of course he would need help from the army of Troofers and the help of cosmic subpoenas. He would then expose the real villains behind the crime, a race of alien reptilians (nod here to David Icke! Plus even if you don’t buy the space lizards, it’s a great metaphor). What do you think, movie makers. Or Jack Black to do an updated version of Computer Man on the subject?
July 9th, 2008 at 4:22 am
liars, fools and thespians…
Salvation is a vote away
July 9th, 2008 at 4:31 am
we need a new branch or elected department to serve as a tyranny response team that has the power to investigate and prosecute military, government officials, and even the president for crimes.
July 9th, 2008 at 4:35 am
and i’d stay away away from denver. it sounds like the government is preparing to stage a biochemical attack.
July 9th, 2008 at 5:01 am
Why should Saudi pilots attack the Twin Towers? Realize that the Bush family and the Saudi royal family sleep in the bed as it were!
The key question is: What was the motive for the attack and who stood to gain the most?
July 9th, 2008 at 5:10 am
Yeah, and why have´nt the states attacked saudi arabia?
July 9th, 2008 at 5:23 am
#41, #42 _ Boo
Your handle suits you “Boo”!!!
#41, well that doesn’t deserve a half educated response, read it again Boo, you may catch on.
#42, a reference to the article is always a good thing, or a date, or, or, or?
If you are going to post messages, try to give the bong a rest for at least 8 hours beforehand, that way what you want to say will most likely be portrayed in your message.
“BOO”
July 9th, 2008 at 5:31 am
Yeah i watched again last night. It was aired Sunday night and last night at 11.50 pm obviuosly when the main aduience is in bed of course. It is just more soft “im stupid journalism”. The documentary was very vague and hard to grasp fro the normal people who have not read or seen about this. To sum up another hatchet job!! A fucking disgrace.
July 9th, 2008 at 5:40 am
Aussie I’m one too. What do you htink of kevin rudd and the ‘carbon emissions’ trading scheme?
July 9th, 2008 at 5:50 am
Hi Ausgirl…
So you’re paying attention to good ol kevin in 07 too then huh?
Yeh the trading scheme is just a tax as Alex Jones puts it..if they charge them more, thus so does the consumer..
And you obviously know about his Asian pacific union..now you know he’s just one of them..
July 9th, 2008 at 5:56 am
The power of television was revealed to the UK public earlier this year.
1. TV phone in scams, BBC and ITV people were prosecuted for taking money when the competition had already picked a winner. In some cases the telephone vote was not even used. People were outraged that this was possible.
2. The Queen is shown storming out of a photography session. All they did was show the scene of he rushing TO the photo session but AFTER they had shown her AT the photo session. This simple switcheroo told a completely different story. BBC got done for that one too.
It’s now clear to people that TV lies to them. This was a very shocking lesson since it became clear that they did not aready know this fact. I was myself shocked that people had previously believed TV so much.
There is a great Simpsons epesode where they have taken a TV interview with Homer and re-edited it. However they left a clock in the background and the hands swing wildly back and forth due to all the out of sequence stuff. Basically Homer sounds like a child molesting pervert and the neighbours turn up at his house with pitchforks.
Television loses it’s power if the TV company is not trusted. The BBC is nolonger trusted by your normal Jim and Kate.
July 9th, 2008 at 5:56 am
The good news is that the truth movement is beginning to alarm mainstream media. The hit piece is a response to this. The reason they “found” the tape was that because they couldn’t stop a videoed copy of it on the Internet so pretending it didn’t exist became pointless.
The BBC got a major change orchestrated by Tony Blair in 2003 following the problems with a weapons inspector who had the gall to be honest. In the row that followed senior people where replaced (The weapons inspector was discovered dead shortly afterwards).
Since then it has literally turned into a ministry for propaganda (not that it was far off that previously).
It has also being heavily infiltrated by the secretive and politically motivated Common Purpose “Charity”.
By the way, the BBC is not funded by the government but by a compulsory licence system enforced against the population by the government who provide jail space and court cases for any not paying. The BBC describe this mafia type arrangement as, “Unique funding
July 9th, 2008 at 6:35 am
DIRTY, PURPLE, ALMOND, CREOSOTE GAS.
That is how I described the smell of VX-nerve gas after it came in through the vent of the shower room on 18/02/04.
It made my kidneys ache like hell and I could rub a finger on my forehead and still smell the VX a week later.
But Tony Blair was hurt by my accusation of cowardice.
And so he got together with Michael Howard and had Fathers for Justice throw PURPLE FLOUR at them in the House of Commons.
The SPIN was that it could have been Weapons of Mass Destruction not flour and so brave Tony was as much in the front line of the War on Terror as anyone else.
But I did not die from it and so they never got to blame Al-Qaed and say they had found the Weapons of Mass Destruction.
July 9th, 2008 at 7:17 am
BBC come clean now. You might escape the GALLOWS after Americans really get pissed off.
July 9th, 2008 at 7:29 am
ummm,we all no in the uk bbc is the propaganda machine for the gov since watchin the doc we should all no that doc was all lies and a cover up . alex’s interview with the guy in wtc7 is the real deal!! but why relitterate what he said to the bbc!! also seen truth rising great movie!! man when i saw luke running away from the gov goons!! respect to you luke ,keep up the fight..
July 9th, 2008 at 7:52 am
#51 _ Robert Alexander Jones
DIRTY, PURPLE, ALMOND, CREOSOTE GAS.
That is how I described the smell of VX-nerve gas after it came in through the vent of the shower room on 18/02/04#
I have often wondered how DIRTY smells!
And PURPLE why that would smell very new age i believe !
.
The smell of “WHAT THE FUCK?” comes to mind!
What’s that my honker detects? Sniff, Sniff, MMMmmmmmmm smells like HALF A BRAIN……..
July 9th, 2008 at 8:23 am
@ comment#53:
matt,
Then shouldn’t the BBC be legally responsible for a cover-up? Basically they should be both crimminally and civilly liable.
July 9th, 2008 at 8:44 am
This is getting more surreal!
Mayybe we will see the truth about 911 come out before America is destroyed, eh?
By aliens?—no, not the illegal kind, Lou Dobbs.
By foriegn armies?—not unless you mean invasive species.
By internal enemies?—-ha!
And now I hope not to make you all puke–conspiracy people have their limits—-
By God—
I mean just how much shit (read sin((another out-there proposition for yu all)) can we expect the
Divine to put up with?
I know I have committed a primitive sin in your presence so
i will go put on my hair shirt as penance.
please forgive me, all you super modern god-like Lucifereans.
please forgive an ignorant
christian.
But you watch now as this Whore of Babylon comes under the Wrath of the
living GOD!
And oh, yeah, even an ignorant
Christian can see that this government bombed itself and then went to conquer our co-religionists in Islam.
MUJAH MUJAH MUJAH MUJAH MUJAH MUJAH MUJAH
Lord help the holy warriors of Islam prevail over the forces of Satan America
in Jesus’ name
p.s. I don’t mean Adolph Hitler, all you mormons.
irqantlub
July 9th, 2008 at 9:58 am
If there is any one that may know about conspiracies, it would be the brits. Just look at american history and you’ll see british conspiracies all over the place.
July 9th, 2008 at 10:43 am
Still, no talk about what the real problem is. War, Conspiracy, look here – look there….look everywhere, except where the real problem lies.
We are not fighting in Iraq, we are policing the streets. We are not itching to bomb the shit out of Iran because they might get nuclear bomb capabilities. We are not over in the middle east trying to take the oil. Although, there are extras in any confrontation.
The real issue for those who look beyond the simple arguments of who did what, who bombed who, who knocked down a building, why didn’t that person do this, or this person do that. No No No.
The real issue here my fellow seekers of truth, is simple.
The banking cartels (it’s not just the Federal Reserve Central Bank) are pissed off as hell at Iraq, Iran, and a few other small nations in the middle east because they have, and are still going to do what they need to in order to no longer accept “Federal Reserve Notes” (IOU’s) from the United States for purchases of oil. They want Euro’s, not Federal Reserve Notes that are losing their value more and more each day. Saddam, six months before the US invaded (no war) Iraq issued his intention to no longer accept Federal Reserve Notes, and was maneuvering to only accept Euro’s as the country’s currency. The bankers took action, and we are seeing it first hand, yet we think there’s all this conspiracy shit. No conspiracy shit, no complexities, just simply that if you go against the bankers they will kill you. How much more do you need to see? Stop chasing buildings that fell, stop worrying about what who said, or who didn’t do, or any of the stuff that takes you away from the real reasons. It’s the money, it’s always about the money and always will be about the money. Do you get it yet?
I ask all of you to remember that things in life are simple. Only politicians, lawyers, and bankers make things difficult, this way they keep you looking for answers that don’t exist, or at the very least will never be told to you or me.
If the United States of America was to abolish the 13th and 16th Amendments (both ratified and put in the books illegally) and took back the control of printing and issuing, and setting the value of it’s own currency as the Constitution of the United States says it should, and it says that the responsibility of such is to be the responsibility of Congress, and Congress alone. If that were to be accomplished, all that you bold about here would change direction for the better good of all of us, throughout the world.
In other words, for we can’t see the forest through the trees, and as we are blind to the truth due top deception, the bankers are killing as they wish all those who would attempt to stop them.
Who can stop them?
July 9th, 2008 at 12:29 pm
When need to point out all injustices ( lies ) otherwise we will never be able to know the truth behind these who is really driving the sheeple. Wake up people before we fall over the ledge!
July 9th, 2008 at 2:15 pm
What a HUGE LOAD OF BS! And the article was like 4 paragraphs long..and STILL morons believe the BS..sheesh..they all deserve their fates…
July 13th, 2008 at 7:45 am
911 Inside Job Test Question
Brown and Root, winner of billions of dollars in no bid contracts for projects during the Vietnam war was acquired by:
A. IBM
B. GE
C. DuPont
D. Halliburton
(correct answer is D. Halliburton)
January 31st, 2009 at 5:44 pm
precisely the point Larry. well done. this is the perfect ensample of the quick, to the point concise, plain truth points we must be prepared to bear witness toward others in all of our affairs. THE WORLD IS ALTOGETHER IS ALTOGETHER ENSLAVED BY OUR AFFLICTION, UNFORTUNATELY WE ARE CONCURRENTLY UNDER SENTENCE OF OF A POWERFUL THREE FOLD SLEEP. a curiously bizarre condition not unlike some late-nite third-rate sci-fi ushering us-all in to the new third world order and ultimately death with our full co-op. sosad2bad