 |
 |
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
 |
|||
|
|||
 |
|||
|
|||
 |
|||
|
The States Are Not Branches Of The Federal Government!
- Text size
J. D. Longstreet
American Daily
February 24, 2009
“We are telling the federal government that we are a sovereign state and want to be treated as such. We are not a branch of the federal government,“ that from Arizona state Rep. Judy Burges. And more and more state legislators and state legislatures are expressing the very same feelings. And they are doing something about it.
- A d v e r t i s e m e n t
A state senator in Oklahoma, Randy Brogdan, has introduced a resolution that would enable his state to “reclaim its 10th Amendment right to reject any and all acts of Congress that go beyond its enumerated powers in violation of the 10th Amendment.“
The Tenth Amendment, a part of the “Bill of Rights”, says flatly: “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.“
Some legal experts say that the Supremacy Clause in the US Constitution makes all the efforts of the states moot. The Supremacy Clause is a clause in the United States Constitution, article VI, paragraph 2. The clause establishes the Constitution, Federal Statutes, and U.S. treaties as “the supreme law of the land.“ The text establishes these as the highest form of law in the American legal system, mandating that state judges uphold them, even if state laws or constitutions conflict. Here’s the text of the Supremacy Clause lifted from the Constitution:
“This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.“
Read entire article
-
- Social bookmarks
- Email this article
-
- Print this page
- Share on Twitter
February 24th, 2009 at 3:03 pm
To the states, or any one of them, or any city of the states.
Resist much, obey little. Once unquestioning obedience, once fully enslaved.
Once fully enslaved, no nation, state, city of this earth, ever afterward resumes its liberty!
By Walt Whitman
February 24th, 2009 at 3:07 pm
A very good movie that surprisingly was actually played on TV was “Billy Jack in Washington”. It is very much better than it sounds, one of the best patriotic movies ever made. Billy Jack becomes a Senator.
February 24th, 2009 at 3:24 pm
Hello Alex,
I’m a listener and fan of your radio show and internet site! I had a thought regarding the topic of individual states seeking legislation that would grant them sovereignty or allow them to succeed from the Union. My question is as follows: I do not recall an occasion, wherein, the voters of Missouri, my state of residence, were asked to vote on the issue; therefore, in what manner did the legislators gain approval or authorization to file any legislation of this kind? Could this have been a hidden agenda and placed on one of our ballots under a deceptive heading? If so, would we, the voters, have any grounds to impeach our legislative members and quell this attempt? My concern is based on historical data, which is suggestive of succession being a bad idea with negative implications; after all, it seems logical that our only recourse through these difficult times lies within the safety, as associated with numbers stated by our national moniker: “United We Stand and Divided We Fall”!
amerakita Reply:
February 24th, 2009 at 9:28 pm
So if we continue to refuse to unite under our own Constitution,what exactly are you pledge unity under? Why do you want to be divided against the Constitution?
Gary Reply:
February 25th, 2009 at 9:53 am
The original constitution: The Articles of Confederation
http://www.usconstitution.net/constconart.html
Krystofer Reply:
March 10th, 2009 at 3:38 pm
becauce once the feds are able to cross the line between state and federal, they will control us all. it just one more thing they need for there new world order.
February 24th, 2009 at 3:28 pm
Check this out, Truth I never knew what this refered to
>
>
*
ya’juj= First of all, we’d like to stress that what we know for certain is that Gog and Magog are descendants of Adam who will appear before the end of the world.
Ya’juj: Ya’juj Ma’juj (Gog and Magog) are one of the signs of Qiyaamah (Doomsday). They are very strong and powerful people whom nobody has the power to fight.
http://www.SingleMuslim.com/
Join free, find a wife who will walk on your right 2 steps back, and keep her mouth shut
Ditto Reply:
February 24th, 2009 at 4:51 pm
Gog and Magog are Daddy and Junior Bush in Bohemian Grove.
REB Reply:
February 24th, 2009 at 9:28 pm
Thats simply retarded!
Ditto Reply:
February 24th, 2009 at 10:47 pm
Look it up…
ComeUpHither Reply:
February 25th, 2009 at 12:31 am
The Bible describes Gog and Magog. (Ezekiel 38:2). Son of man, set thy face against Gog, the land of Magog, the chief prince of Meshech and Tubal, and prophesy against him (Ezekiel 38:2). Each of these names can be located within the present day Soviet Union. Tobolsk, the eastern capital of the USSR , is the ancient “Tubal” and is southwest of Siberia on modern maps. Meshech is Moscow. The historical names for Moscow begin with “Moscoty,” then “Moscovy” and finally, Moscow. “Rosh” is Russia herself.
Russia or (Gog, Magog) invades Israel from the north: And thou shalt come up from the north parts, thou , and many people with thee, all of them riding upon horses, a great company, and a mighty army: And thou shalt come up against my people of Israel, as a cloud to cover the land; it shall be in the latter days, and I will bring thee against my land, that the heathen may know me, when I shall be sanctified in thee , O Gog, before their eyes (Ezekiel 38:15,16). Russia is directly north from Israel.
robert hillman Reply:
February 25th, 2009 at 5:56 pm
I want a wife that will walk with me talk to me share her heart let me love her
be my wife and lover
my friend and helper
someone to share my life
and love god
together HUSBANDS are to LOVE THEIR WIVES
as christ LOVED THE CHURCH
and woman are to RESPECT THEIR HUSBANDS
Integrity@cyg.net
February 24th, 2009 at 3:30 pm
This was for a little more to what i call what if
Or just plane nuts
February 24th, 2009 at 4:32 pm
REPENT.UNITE.RESIST.
February 24th, 2009 at 4:50 pm
GREAT VIDEO!
Something to tell the world!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rT8cg62iKyg
Blasta Reply:
February 24th, 2009 at 9:10 pm
I am the greatest fan of t–e-d..p-ik..e…I am a fan of david-d-u-k-e. I have nothing better to do all day than to try and harm the Jewish people. Did you ever see their horns? My grandfather says I should grow out my hair and shave off my pointy beard, but I told him that the other people in my supremacist movement would have trouble recognizing me if I did that.he said that they would know me by my t-shirt with the s-w-a-s-ti-k-a on it, and I should get rid of that too. But I am very attached to my shirt, I never take it off. I need my bald head to help polish my n-a-zi belt buckles, and I need my pointy beard so my dog will kiss me (he doesn’t like a clean shaven face).
blasta's a midget Reply:
March 18th, 2009 at 7:15 pm
weirdo
February 24th, 2009 at 4:54 pm
THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is a document belonging to THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CORPORATION. It was rewritten after the civil war for the corporate entity not The United States of America. The ‘REAL’ and original constitution is titled thusly.
The Constitution For The United States Of America. Note the : “For”.
Except for the people who pulled the switch, nobody else has ever seen the original.
February 24th, 2009 at 5:28 pm
This is what needs to happen, and the sooner the better:
1. The states need to secede from the union (which they formed, to begin with)
2. The states need to dissolve the federal government (which they created, to begin with)
3. The states need to dissolve the Constitution, which was created for the purpose of establishing a central government with a central banking system (by the Federalists, who were Rothschild agents)
4. The states need to re-adopt our original constitution, the Articles of Confedration, which:
(a) Didn’t allow for a President (no president, no dictator possible)
(b) Allowed for the states to defend themselves
(c) Most importantly, prevented any possibility of a central bank by providing that the states
coin their own money.
February 24th, 2009 at 5:43 pm
Folks they are probe’ing us..Try to get a feel what we shall do and think and our reactions to every thing right now..And the states are standing up and saying NO. SO that is a good thing..JUST SAY “NO” was a drug ad back in the late 80’s and early 90’s and in fact makes since…
A ol’ saying if you say a man who jumped off of a high bridge would u follow (no bungie cord attached of course) well would ya??? I think NOT unless your ill..!!!! Then u should go see a shrink.. So by state congress and senate saying NO and standing up to them, the feds this is good. And also we can make a difference, we can VOTE the ones out who indeed signed off on bills and such with our are aproval…!!! AND if you want to jump off a high bridge that means your a sheep and follow the ones who are “ILL” and then you need to seek out the truth and Read whats going on and also read the bible thats the real truth…remember god loves you and wants you to come to him, he is your maker..and also u may starve and be hurt and in pain and loosing your home..I am sorry I wish I could help you, but “GOD/JESUS” can so ask him for help and become a christian your life shall change…:)
February 24th, 2009 at 6:37 pm
Pack a gun and pay no tax. Pack a gun and pay no tax. Pack a gun and pay no tax. Pack a gun and pay no tax. Pack a gun and pay no tax. Pack a gun and pay no tax. Pack a gun and pay no tax. Pack a gun and pay no tax. Pack a gun and pay no tax. Pack a gun and pay no tax. Pack a gun and pay no tax. Pack a gun and pay no tax. Pack a gun and pay no tax. Pack a gun and pay no tax. Pack a gun and pay no tax. Pack a gun and pay no tax.
True Bread Reply:
February 24th, 2009 at 10:36 pm
all work and no play make jack a dull boy (wash rinse repeat)
Gary Reply:
February 25th, 2009 at 9:26 am
redrum, redrum, redrum
February 24th, 2009 at 6:44 pm
What this line means “This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof;(Meaning it has be in compliance with the constitution) and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, (Meaning the treats it makes with other countries and bodies, however it cannot override the rights of the people of the United States) shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the contrary notwithstanding.“
Since a treaty is a form a law, the laws must adhere to the constitution and thus the states are bound to the law, that is if the law is indeed constitutional. So saying the states must adhere to the federal law if it isnt constitutional is rather stupid. Many drug and firearm laws are unconstitutional on the fact that the Federal government has no power over the peoples right to choose for themselves. If ive gotten it wrong somewhere please tell me where and how. Be respectful if you disagree.
1776jedi Reply:
February 26th, 2009 at 3:14 am
I think you wacked that nail right on the head. In order of supremacy the US Constitution is first, followed by Federal law, treaties, State Constitutions, state law, county and municipal. But ALL Federal, State, local laws and treaties MUST be in line with the Constitution in order to be VALID! Any law whether State, Federal or local that is not in line with the Constitution is NULL and VOID. The Supremacy Clause actually supports what the States are doing, because much of what the Federal Government is doing is NOT Constitutional and the Constitution is the supreme law, above and beyond the convoluted drivel that Congress passes without reading. The architects of the Constitution did an awesome job, because the Supremacy Clause, along with the 9th and 10th amendments are exactly what the States need in this situation. The States are not local branches of the Federal Government, they created the Federal Government, as their servant for interstate and external matters. The Several States of the Union ARE the United States of America, not the Federal Government.
It is a simple matter really, secession is unnecessary, if all or most of the States choose to ignore and not cooperate with the Federal Government, there is not much that the Feds can do to enforce their law,s save declare war on America. Especially if regular people chip in. Imagine, State courts refusing to enforce federal laws, local and state police that don’t talk to the FBI or DEA, State computer systems that just stop updating Federal databases, Electrical Co-ops, and municipal power grids that refuse federal buildings and military bases electricity. Port Authorities refusing portage for Navy and Coast guard vessels, airports shut down, gas stations with no gas for government vehicles. There are many thousands of ways that State, county, and municipal governments along with citizens could prosecute a general strike, peacefully and directed at the infrastructure, and people that make up the Federal Government.
This of course may result in the Federal Monster resorting to violence to protect it’s stolen power. In return the States and People have the right to defend themselves. This isn’t about dissolving the Union, or seceding to make new nations, it’s about the Fifty States standing up to this monstrosity that is raping the nation and enslaving it, so that the nation and the liberties of its People can be preserved.
February 24th, 2009 at 7:00 pm
Yes they are. Everybody that works for state gov’t is waiting to move up to the feds. With the states, they’re just getting their feet wet. With the feds, they’ll wet their pants.
February 24th, 2009 at 7:02 pm
Dittos to what Michael said
February 24th, 2009 at 7:08 pm
The States need not succeed since they compact has been broken. All they need to do is re unite under a new limited central government and tell this one to take a hike. That we give them so much time to leave the land mass of the New United States.
Gary Reply:
February 25th, 2009 at 9:41 am
Yes! The federal government has already effectively dissolved the union by violating the terms of it. We need to reinstate our original constitution – The Articles of Confederation.
http://www.usconstitution.net/constconart.html
February 24th, 2009 at 8:44 pm
There is no arguing to the contrary. The United States is a foreign corporation. In fact, if one reads Title 28 USCS § 297, the “compact states” of subsection (a) are clearly defined as “countries” in subsection (b). So if the United States is a foreign corporation in relation to a group of “countries,” then what are the ramifications to those who have dual citizenship, especially when the foreign corporation formally enters into bankruptcy and becomes pledged to a third party creditor?
Gary Reply:
February 25th, 2009 at 9:43 am
A third party creditor that has already taken that corporation into receivership more than 95 years ago.
February 24th, 2009 at 9:25 pm
States have the right;no, the duty to stand up for the state,not the federal! Unconstitutional edicts are not law and no one has to submit to them!
“The general misconception is that any statute passed by legislators bearing the appearance of law constitutes the law of the land. The Constitution of the United States is the supreme law of the land, and any statue, to be valid, must be in agreement. It is impossible for both the Constitution and a law violating it to be valid; one must prevail. This is succinctly stated as follows: The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of its enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never been passed. Such a statute leaves the question that it purports to settle just as it would be had the statute not been enacted.” “Since an unconstitutional law is void, the general principals follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority on anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts performed under it.. A void act cannot be legally consistent with a valid one. An unconstitutional law cannot operate to supersede any existing valid law. Indeed, insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, it is superseded thereby. No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it.”
Sixteenth American Jurisprudence, Second Edition, Section 177. (late 2nd Ed. Section 256)
February 24th, 2009 at 9:25 pm
I found the article interesting, but I could not tell on which side of the fence he was standing on, so allow me to make a few points.
He gave a quote from the Constitution as though it had some effect on State’s Rights, but I would disagree.
The first line tells it all. This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof;
This means the Laws of the United States are to be made in pursuance of the term, conditions and laws as expressed in The Constitution of The United States. Therefore, any law which is repugnant to The Constitution is void of law and is not law.
If you have any doubts about what I am telling you, please refer to the Supreme Court ruling for Marbury vs. Madison 1803. In short the Justices opinion was that, any law which is repugnant to The Constitution is void of law and is not law.
No law may over ride The Constitution! Peroid!
February 24th, 2009 at 10:35 pm
Article 6, Section 2 of the Constitution may not clash with the provisions of the 9th and 10th Amendments to the Constitution for the United States of America.
It’s like the claim of the Federal government using Article 6, Section to can override everything else in the Constitution, which is absolute bullshit.
Re-read the first sentence of Article 6, Section 2…
The Laws of the United States shall be made in Persuance thereof ( speaking of “This Constitution”).
So, the Laws of the United States shall be made in Pursuance to the 9th and the 10th Amendments, NOT CONTRARY TO THOSE AMENDMENTS.
Furthermore, the last sentence supports the States, not the Federal government as is falsely alleged.
Whoever makes any claim that the Federal government is supreme needs to go back to school and learn how to read properly.
The Judges are bound by anything IN THE CONSTITUTION, or LAWS OF ANY STATE… TO THE CONTRARY…NOTWITHSTANDING.
That means the States are the Master, not the servant.
Anything the States refuse to allow that was not a part of the original Constitution and the enumerated powers found therein belongs to the States. Those enumerated powers have to be specific, not generalized.
If the State says NO to the Congress or the President to powers not delegated specifically by the Constitution, then the Federal Law is of no force and effect in that State that says, “NO.”
There is no supremacy Clause by the Federal government over the several States.
Anyone who says there is? They are a stupid, fucking ignorant LIAR.
February 24th, 2009 at 11:37 pm
The bastards have used the Commerce clause of the Constitution Art I sec. 8 to subvert unlawfully the instrument and our rights. Everything from trade to firearms.
There is no arguing to the contrary. The United States is a foreign corporation. In fact, if one reads Title 28 USCS § 297, the “compact states” of subsection (a) are clearly defined as “countries” in subsection (b). So if the United States is a foreign corporation in relation to a group of “countries,” then what are the ramifications to those who have dual citizenship, especially when the foreign corporation formally enters into bankruptcy and becomes pledged to a third party creditor?
This is also supported by the statement; “The United States Government is a Foreign Corporation With Respect to a State”, Volume 20, Corpus Juris Sec. § 1785 based on the definitions § 1783. “Definitions” and § 1784. “What Are Foreign Corporations”.
For supporting material and evidence see the following with references…
“Essay on Citizenship”
“The United States Government is a Foreign Corporation With Respect to a State”,
Gary Reply:
February 25th, 2009 at 9:45 am
Yeah, funny about that, huh? Almost like it was designed that way.
http://www.rense.com/general50/ccons.htm
February 25th, 2009 at 12:25 am
Michael,REB,and watchman =A++++++++++ “I believe that our lawyer written const.was created to put us exactly where we are today,or to weak to prevent it”Either way its time to buck up. Also if you read the preamble you see two entities, the united States,and as TOECUTTER correctly states the corporation “THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA” All bureaucrats employed under the corporation are foreign agents with no authority to act in any State at any time. Go figure.
February 25th, 2009 at 12:56 am
The “Read entire article” Link seems to be dead on this article, so I went and found the article for everyone, here is the link to the rest of the article.
http://americandaily.com/index.php/article/737
February 25th, 2009 at 1:15 am
let the REVOLUTION commence , hail SATAN
February 25th, 2009 at 1:22 am
One thing that is interesting is that Moscow is directly norht of Israel.
February 25th, 2009 at 1:29 am
People, just get ahold of your local state represenatives and tell them that you support resolutions that underline the 10th amendment. Be sure to be polite and informed.
February 25th, 2009 at 1:32 am
Oops that previous post be me went to the wrong spot.
February 25th, 2009 at 2:26 am
The 14th amendment to the constitution allowed the federal government to incorporate, but it did not say what kind of corporation it could become. It is a FOREIGN CORPORATION! If you want to sue “THE UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT”, you have to do so under International law. The US Government is chartered in the Hague, Netherlands. Does the “District of Columbia” sound like a place inside the United States? It’s not. Washington D.C., is a small piece of land here in this country that legally exists in another country. I have never left a comment on a site like this before but I feel it is time to make people aware of what you are really up against here. The states cannot claim sovereignty because they are all DIVISIONS of the US Government and they do not have ownership of their assets. The assets are owned by a FOREIGN CORPORATION. ALL of the States have pledged the assets of their State to the US GOV (FOREIGN CORP) in exchange for receiving things like HIGHWAY FUNDS and EDUCATION. THE STATES GAVE UP THEIR RIGHTS and OWNERSHIP! I have spent a number of years working in the dark area of International Corporate asset protection and there are a few things you should know. ALL of the States are Divisions of the (FOREIGN) US GOV. and all of the counties and cities within are DIVISIONS of the state. This is the reason Orange County, CA was able to file a bankruptcy and remain in place. The US GOV. abandoned the DBA for Orange County, and filed a new one. ALL of the assets of Orange County were retained because they were pledged to The US GOVERNMENT (FOREIGN CORPORATION) and (THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK), who is the creditor (OWNER) of the assets. Once the DBA was abandoned, the assets could not be seized. I am about to tell you a few things that could get you in a lot of trouble so be careful who you talk to about this. I will call this “THE GREATEST LIE EVER TOLD”. In 1933, at the height of the great depression, FDR filed a bankruptcy on the UNITED STATES to the FEDERAL RESERVE BANK (CREDITOR). This was called “THE NEW DEAL”. The bankers of England and Europe are the owners of (THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK) and they are the ones who bailed us out of the depression (THEY LOANED US THE MONEY). They did it with fake money (reserve notes) so it cost them nothing! They own ALL of the assets of this country through our phony debt! Under the terms of the US BANKRUPTCY, the constitution was suspended in 1933!. We lost our constitutional rights when that happened. IF you go into a court of law and cite your constitutional rights, the judge is laughing under his breath because he knows that you don’t know. If you have been in a court of law, you may have seen the US flag that has gold fringe around the edges. That is not a decoration, it is the same gold fringe that hangs off the shoulder of a British admirals uniform. THIS COUNTRY HAS BEEN UNDER INTERNATIONAL MARITIME LAW SINCE 1933!!! in a court of law you will walk through a small wooden gate to approach the judge. Once you cross that threshold you are no longer in the United States, you are now in an International Tribunal Court and you are subject to their laws. THE CONSTITUTION DOES NOT APPLY! It was suspended in 1933! The reason I am telling you this is because the game was over 76 years ago!. Under the UNIFORM COMMERCIAL CODE the assets of this country can be repossessed at any time by our creditors (THE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK) demanding payment of the money we owe them (THE NATIONAL DEBT). It will all be perfectly legal under INTERNATIONAL MARITIME LAW. The reason JFK was assassinated had nothing to do with the MOB, CUBA, JOHNSON or any of those other ridiculous theories. He was killed because he found out about the Bankruptcy that FDR filed and what a Federal Reserve note was. JFK was printing American currency and had it warehoused and ready for distribution when he was killed. He really was trying to help us. Have you heard his speech about “SECRET SOCIETIES” and “THE SHADOW GOVERNMENT” on you tube? This stuff is real. We won our independence in 1776 and they got us back in 1933. Did you really think they would just let us go after only one war? There is too much money here. The other thing that happened in 1933 was the creation of the “SOCIAL SECURITY SYSTEM”. This is the part you will not like. When you signed your ssi card, you were agreeing to pledge your personal assets (PROPERTY,WAGES, LABOR ect.) in exchange for GOVERNMENT ASSISTANCE, (SSI, WELFARE, UNEMPLOYMENT, FOOD STAMPS, ect.) If you have never received aid from the Government, you still pledged your assets to pay off the US GOV debt. Obviously, most people are not aware of the terms of the bankruptcy, they don’t Even know it happened, but IGNORANCE OF THE LAW IS NO EXCUSE. Unfortunately, that is how it works in the courts. The people who loaned us the money had no obligation to explain all of this, it was your job to find out about it. Why would anyone think that GOV aid was free? Nothing is free! The time is coming soon to make a choice. If you stand and die, it will be for property that you do not own. I know that is a hard pill to swallow, but it is the truth. A better choice would be to leave the country, or move to the northern US and live off the land. If you stay in the cities or rural areas, you will have to go along with the program. The group behind this thing know exactly what they are doing. They have been doing it a long time. I really do wish the best for everyone, but keep one thing in mind, We stole this land from the Indians, and now someone else has stolen it from us. GOOD LUCK!!!!
Truth Now Reply:
February 25th, 2009 at 4:07 am
I just read something that may counter what you wrote khatman.
Because “THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA” and not the “The Constitution for the united states of America” is a constitution for the corporation (a business contract) of THE UNITED STATES, it would seem to me that if the states wish to use there corporate 10th amendment rights they could do so, or they could just simply ignore the corporation from another country (THE UNITED STATES based in the District of Columbia) and adhere to the real constitution which is the Constitution for the untied states of America.
I bet very few people understand what the heck I’m talking about so here is a link that might help clear this up about the Act of 1871, which was titled as “An Act To Provide A Government for the District of Columbia”. The article states that this Act of 1871 was really an act of treason by the 41st congress against the united states of America.
http://www.serendipity.li/jsmi.....ration.htm
I’m interested in seeing what you and other think khatman.
February 25th, 2009 at 4:58 am
Thank you for responding, Truth Now. What you are talking about is a legal technicality of the upper and lower case spelling which could help you as a person get out of this mess, it will not help the States because they ratified the amendment which means they accepted it into their State charter.
This game really is over and you can only help yourself. The constitution was suspended in 1933
and it has not been in force since then. This country has been operating under executive order
since the beginning of the civil war (1865). The southern States would not play ball with the North
and that opened the window for all of this.
February 25th, 2009 at 8:01 am
The states may not be a BRANCH of the federal gov’t, but the court systems are the biggest part of the supreme court system. Without State court systems, the Supreme Court would have to try every court case in the nation, so the states are there to weed out all the insignificant cases (Civil suits, etc.) and promote the siginificant ones (Civil Rights, etc.)
February 25th, 2009 at 8:31 am
No, I don’t expect you have. None of us have. We’ve been taught, all our lives, that the Articles of Confederation were somehow flawed and had to be replaced by the Constitution. Of course you’ve never heard of it!
http://www.javelinpress.com/ho.....berty.html
February 25th, 2009 at 10:47 am
What every Christian should know about the new world order.
http://www.chuckbaldwinlive.com/sermonvideo.php
February 25th, 2009 at 12:11 pm
Are YOU a terrorist? … Take the test ….
http://intwain.wordpress.com/2.....terrorist/
February 25th, 2009 at 12:20 pm
From my understanding a Treaty means and agreement between both sides, a contract. As in most cases, there is little or no agreement with the States. I see this as little more then follow what we say States or else. As money comes into play, the States will get the money,and follow what the Fed has put down. It is my believe that this has to change. For the States to stop taking Fed money with strings attached,before they start talking about the 10h Amendment.
February 25th, 2009 at 1:48 pm
http://www.freestateohio.com
February 25th, 2009 at 5:21 pm
get crossbows
get knives
get home made pepper spray
February 25th, 2009 at 7:58 pm
ENOUGH OF THESE OPPRESSIVE FEDERAL LACKEYS. WE HAVE STATE RIGHT, THEY DON’T, WE DON’T HAVE TO LISTEN TO THEIR CLAP TRAP. TIME TO OPEN A CAN OF WHOOP-ASS ON THE EVIL BLOOD SUCKING BASTARDS AND SEND THEM BACK TO HELL.
February 25th, 2009 at 10:11 pm
Hey guys,I have gotten political real quick,Obama is running this country into the ground,it was on its way before put he is pushing the fast forward button with his check book-My god!!!!
I moved to South Carolina 4 months ago and they havent wasted any time claiming the 10,the 9th ammendmant and about the govt claiming marsh all law for us etc…ETC….. Things are getting serious for the states to do this,they wouldnt do these things if they didnt fear the govt was going to limit our free speech or right to bare arms!!!!None of the states would- I really have a fear that our constitution is going down the toilet here,the toilet in washington!!!Reading the tenth ammendment,our forefathers knew completley about repression!!!!!
February 26th, 2009 at 5:39 am
Visit my myspace profile:
http://profile.myspace.com/ind.....=455796167
many info about censoring, disinfo, and false leaders …
What your leaders dont want you to know …