 |
|
|
|||
 |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|||
|
|
|
||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|
|||
 |
|||
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|||
|
Twenty Minutes with the President
- Text size
Reported by Charlie Sheen
Infowars
Tuesday, September 8, 2009
Related: Sheen Blasts Cowardly Corporate Media Refusal to Debate 9/11 Facts
Charlie Sheen’s Video Message to President Obama
Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.
Alex Jones interviews Charlie Sheen.
I recently had the pleasure of sitting down with our 44th President of the United States of America, Barack Hussein Obama, while he was out promoting his health care reform initiative. I requested 30 minutes given the scope and detail of my inquiry; they said I could have 20. Twenty minutes, 1200 seconds, not a lot of time to question the President about one of the most important events in our nation’s history. The following is a transcript of our remarkable discussion.
————————————————————————————————————————
Charlie Sheen – Good afternoon Mr. President, thank you so much for taking time out of your demanding schedule.
President Barack Obama – My pleasure, the content of your request seemed like something I should carve out a few minutes for.
CS – I should point out that I voted for you, as your promises of hope and change, transparency and accountability, as well as putting government back into the hands of the American people, struck an emotional chord in me that I hadn’t felt in quite some time, perhaps ever.
PBO – And I appreciate that Charlie. Big fan of the show, by the way.
CS – Sir, I can’t imagine when you might find the time to actually watch my show given the measure of what you inherited.
PBO – I have it Tivo’d on Air Force One. Nice break from the traveling press corps. (He glances at his watch) not to be abrupt or to rush you, but you have 19 minutes left.
CS – I’ll take that as an invitation to cut to the chase.
PBO – I’m all ears. Or so I’ve been told.
CS – Sir, in the very near future we will be experiencing our first 9/11 anniversary with you as Commander in Chief.
PBO – Yes. A very solemn day for our Nation. A day of reflection and yet a day of historical consciousness as well.
CS – Very much so sir, very much so indeed…. Now; In researching your position regarding the events of 9/11 and the subsequent investigation that followed, am I correct to understand that you fully support and endorse the findings of the commission report otherwise known as the ‘official story’?
PBO – Do I have any reason not to? Given that most of us are presumably in touch with similar evidence.
CS – I really wish that were the case, sir. Are you aware, Mr. President, of the recent stunning revelations that sixty percent of the 9/11 commissioners have publicly stated that the government agreed not to tell the truth about 9/11 and that the Pentagon was engaged in deliberate deception about their response to the attack?
PBO – I am aware of certain “in fighting” during the course of their very thorough and tireless investigative process.
CS – Mr. President, it’s hard to label this type of friction as “in fighting” or make the irresponsible leap to “thorough,” when the evidence I insist you examine regarding 6 of the 10 members are statements of fact.
(At this point one of Obama’s senior aides approaches the President and whispers into his ear. Obama glances quickly at his watch and nods as the aide resumes his post at the doorway, directly behind me.)
PBO – No disrespect Mr. Sheen, but I have to ask; what is it that you seem to be implying with the initial direction of this discussion?
CS – I am not implying anything Mr. President. I am here to present the facts and see what you plan to do with them.
PBO – Let me guess; your ‘facts,’ allegedly supporting these claims are in the folders you brought with you?
CS – Good guess Mr. President.
(I hand the first folder of documents to the President)
CS – Again sir, these are not my opinions or assumptions, this is all a matter of public record, reported through mainstream media, painstakingly fact checked and verified.
(the President glances into the folder I handed him)
CS – You’ll notice sir on page one of the dossier dated August of ‘06 from the Washington Post, the statements of John Farmer, senior council to the 9/11 commission, his quote stating, “I was shocked how different the truth was from the way it was described.”
PBO – (as he glances down at the report, almost inaudible) …. um hmm….
CS – He goes on to further state “The [NORAD Air Defense] tapes told a radically different story from what had been told to us and the public for two years….”
(the President continues to view the documents)
CS – On pages two and three, sir, are the statements, as well, from commission co-chairmen Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton, commissioners Bob Kerrey, Timothy Roemer and John Lehman, as well as the statements of commissioner Max Cleland, an ex-Senator from Georgia , who resigned, stating:
“It is a national scandal. This investigation is now compromised. One of these days we will have to get the full story because the 9/11 issue is so important to America. But this White House wants to cover it up.”
He also described President Bush’s desire to delay the process as not to damage the ‘04 re-election bid. They suspected deception to the point where they considered referring the matter to the Justice Department for criminal investigation. Mr. President, this information alone is unequivocally grounds for a new investigation!
PBO – Mistakes were clearly made but we as a people and as a country need to move forward. It is obviously in our best interest as a democratic society to focus our efforts and our resources on the future of this great nation and our ability to protect the American people and our allies from this type of terrorism in the coming years.
CS – Sir, how can we focus on the future when THE COMMISSION ITSELF is on record stating that they still do not know the truth??
PBO – Even if what you state, might in some capacity, begin to approach an open discussion or balanced debate, I can’t speak for, or about the decisions certain commission members made during an extremely difficult period. Perhaps you should be interviewing them instead of me. Wait, don’t tell me; I was easier to track down than they were?
CS – Not exactly sir, but let’s be honest. You’re the President of the United States, the leader of the free world, the buck stops with you. 9/11 has been the pretext for the systematic dismantling of our Constitution and Bill of Rights. Your administration is reading from the same playbook that the Bush administration foisted on America through documented secrecy and deception.
PBO – Mr. Sheen, I’m having a difficult time sitting here and listening to you draw distorted parallels between the Bush/Cheney regime and mine.
CS – Mr. President the parallels are not distorted just because you say they are. Let’s stick to the facts. You promised to abolish the Patriot Act and then voted to re-authorize it. You pledged to end warrantless wire tapping against the American people and now energetically defend it. You decried the practice of rendition and now continue it. You promised over and over again on the campaign trail, that you would end the practice of indefinite detention and instead, you have expanded it to permanent detention of “detainees” without trial. This far exceeds the outrages of the former administration. Call me crazy Mr. President, but is this not your record?
PBO – Mr. Sheen, my staff and I authorized this interview based on your request to discuss 9/11 and deliver some additional information you’re convinced I’d not previously reviewed. Call me crazy, But it appears as though you’ve blindly wandered off topic.
CS – Sir, the examples I just illustrated are a direct result of 9/11.
PBO – And I’m telling you that we must move forward, we must endure through these dangerous and politically challenging years ahead.
CS – Mr. President, we cannot move forward with a bottomless warren of unanswered questions surrounding that day and its aftermath.
PBO – I read the official report. Every word every page. Perhaps you should do the same.
CS – I have sir, and so have thousands of family members of the victims, and guess what; they have the same questions I do and probably a lot more. I didn’t lose a loved one on that horrific day Mr. President and neither did you. But since then I, along with millions of other Americans lost something we held true and dear for most of our lives in this great country of ours; we lost our hope.
PBO – And I’d like to believe that I am here to restore that hope. To restore confidence in your leaders, in the system that the voting public chose through a peaceful transfer of power.
(An odd moment of silence between us. Precious time ticking away).
CS – Mr. President, are you aware of the number of days it took to begin the investigation into JFK’s assassination?
PBO – If memory serves I believe it was two weeks.
CS – Close. Seventeen days to be exact. Are you aware sir, how long it took to begin the investigation into Pearl Harbor?
PBO – I would say again about….two weeks.
CS – Close again sir, eleven days to be exact. Are you aware Mr. President how long it took to begin the investigation into 9/11?
PBO – I know it must have seemed like a very long time for all the grieving families.
CS – It was a very long time Mr. President – four hundred and forty days. Roughly 14 months. Does it bother you Mr. President that it only took FIVE HOURS for Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld after the initial attack to recommend and endorse a full scale offensive against Iraq?
PBO – I am not aware of any such purported claim.
CS – I have the proof Mr. President, along with scores of documents and facts I’d like you to take a look at. Here.
(I hand him another file – much thicker than the first)
PBO – I see you came prepared Charlie.
CS – No other way to show up Mr. President. When in doubt over prepare I always say.
PBO – Now you sound like the First Lady.
CS – That’s quite a compliment sir.
PBO – As you wish. Please continue.
CS – Sir, I’d like to direct your attention to the stack of documents in the folder I just handed you. The first in from the top is entitled “Operation Northwoods“, a declassified Pentagon plan to stage terror attacks on US soil, to be blamed on Cuba as a pretext for war.
PBO – And I’d like to direct your attention to the fact that the principle draftsman of this improbable blueprint was quickly denied a second term as Joint Chiefs chairman and sent packing to a European NATO garrison. Thank God his otherworldly ambitions never saw the light of day.
CS – I wouldn’t be so certain about that Mr. President.
PBO – I could easily say the same to you Charlie.
(the President checks his watch)
|
|
 |
|
| Charlie Sheen writing 20 Minutes with the President. Photo by Alex Jones. | |
CS – The next document reads “Declassified staged provocations.” Now, Honestly Mr. President I wish I was making this stuff up. I’m certain you are familiar with the USS Maine Incident, the sinking of the Lusitania, which we all now know brought us into WW1, and of course the most famous, the Gulf of Tonkin incident.
PBO – Of course I am familiar with these historical events and I’m aware that there’s a measure of controversy surrounding them. But to be quite frank with you, this is all ancient history.
CS – Mr. President, it has been often said; “Those who do not know history are doomed to repeat it.” And I concede to you sir, these events are the past.
PBO – A vastly different world young man, shouldering a radically disparate state of universal affairs.
CS – No argument sir, I’m merely inviting you to acknowledge some credibility to the pattern or the theme. Case in point; the next document in your folder. It was published by the think-tank, Project For a New American Century and it’s entitled “Rebuilding Americas Defenses“, and was written by Dick Cheney and Jeb Bush. To quote from the document sir – (the President interrupts)
PBO – “Further, the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event – like a new Pearl Harbor.”
CS – Touche, sir. Your thoughts on this statement Mr. President?
PBO – I would call this a blatant case of misjudgment fueled by an unfortunate milieu of assumption. For some, the uninformed denial of coincidence.
CS – Interesting angle sir. Nevertheless, Vice President Cheney didn’t stop there. In early 2008, Pulitzer prize winning journalist Seymour Hersh and MSNBC, both reported that Cheney had proposed to the Pentagon an outrageous plan to have the U.S. Navy create fake Iranian patrol boats, to be manned by Navy Seals, who would then stage an attack on US destroyers in the Strait of Hormuz. This event was to be blamed on Iran and used as a pretext for war. Does any of this information worry you Mr. President? Should we just ignore it, until these realities can be dismissed years from now by our children, as ancient history as well?
PBO – Of course this information worries me, yet it’s not nearly as worrisome as you sitting here today suspiciously implying that 9/11 was somehow allowed to happen or even orchestrated from the inside.
CS – Mr. President I am not suspiciously implying anything. I am merely exposing the documents and asking the questions that nobody in power will even look at or acknowledge. And as I stated earlier, I voted for you, I believed in your message of hope and change. Mr. President I have come to you specifically hoping for a change. A change in the perception that our government has not yet made itself open and accountable to the people. These are your words Mr. President not mine. The lives of thousands were brutally cut short and those left behind to suffer their infinite pain are with me today Mr. President. They are with me in spirit and flesh, and the message we carry will not be silenced anymore by media fueled mantras insisting how they are supposed to feel. Deciding for them, for 8 long years, what can be thought, what can be said, what can be asked.
PBO – And I appreciate your passion, I appreciate your conviction. In spite of your concerns, in spite of what your data might or might not reveal, what you and the families must understand and accept is that we are doing everything we can to protect you.
CS – Mr. President , I realize were very short on time, so please allow me to run down a list of bullet points that might illuminate some reasons why we don’t embrace the warm hug of Federal protection.
PBO – We’ve come this far. Fire away.
CS – Please keep in mind Mr. President everything I’m about to say is documented as fact and part of the public record. The information you are holding in your hands chronicles and verifies each and every point.
PBO – You have five minutes left. The floor is yours. Brief me.
CS – Thank you Mr. President. Okay, first; On the FBI’s most wanted list Osama Bin Laden is not charged with the crimes of 911. When I called the FBI to ask them why this was the case, they replied: “There’s not enough evidence to link Bin Laden to the crime scene,” I later discovered he had never even been indicted by the D.O.J.
CS – Number 2; FBI translator Sibel Edmonds, was dismissed and gagged by the D.O.J. after she revealed that the government had foreknowledge of plans to attack American cities using planes as bombs as early as April 2001. In July of ‘09, Mrs. Edmonds broke the Federal gag order and went public to reveal that Osama Bin Laden, Al Qaeda and the Taliban were all working for and with the C.I.A. up until the day of 9/11.
CS – Number 3; The following is a quote from Mayor Giuliani during an interview on 9/11 with Peter Jennings for ABC News. “I went down to the scene and we set up headquarters at 75 Barkley Street, which was right there with the Police Commissioner, the Fire Commissioner, the Head of Emergency Management, and we were operating out of there when we were told that the World Trade Center was going to collapse. And it did collapse before we could actually get out of the building, so we were trapped in the building for 10, 15 minutes, and finally found an exit and got out, walked north, and took a lot of people with us.”
WHO TOLD HIM THIS??? To this day, the answer to this question remains unanswered, completely ignored and emphatically DENIED by Mayor Giuliani on several public occasions.
CS – Number 4; In April 2004, USA Today reported, “In the two years before the Sept. 11 attacks, the North American Aerospace Defense Command conducted exercises simulating what the White House says was unimaginable at the time: hijacked airliners used as weapons to crash into targets and cause mass casualties.” One of the targets was the World Trade Center.
CS – Number 5; On September 12th 2007, CNN’s ‘Anderson Cooper 360′, reported that the mysterious “white plane” spotted and videotaped by multiple media outlets, flying in restricted airspace over the White House shortly before 10am on the morning of 9/11, was in fact the Air Force’s E-4B, a specially modified Boeing 747 with a communications pod behind the cockpit; otherwise known as “The Doomsday Plane”.
Though fully aware of the event, the 9/11 Commission did not deem the appearance of the military plane to be of any interest and did not include it in the final 9/11 Commission report.
CS – Number 6; Three F-16s assigned to Andrews Air Force Base, ten miles from Washington, DC, are conducting training exercises in North Carolina 207 miles away as the first plane crashes into the WTC. Even at significantly less than their top speed of 1500 mph, they could still have defended the skies over Washington well before 9am, more than 37 minutes before Flight 77 crashes into the Pentagon, however, they did not return until after 9:55am.
Andrews AFB had no armed fighters on alert and ready to take off on the morning of 9/11.
CS – Number 7; WTC Building 7. Watch the video of its collapse.
CS – Number 8; Flight 93 is fourth plane to crash on 9/11 at 10:03am. V.P. Cheney only gives shoot down order at 10:10-10:20am and this is not communicated to NORAD until 28 minutes after Flight 93 has crashed.
Fueling further suspicion on this front is the fact that three months before the attacks of 9/11, Dick Cheney usurped control of NORAD, and therefore he, and no one else on planet Earth, had the power to call for military sorties on the hijacked airliners on 9/11. He did not exercise that power. Three months after 9/11, he relinquished command of NORAD and returned it to military operation.
- A d v e r t i s e m e n t
CS – Number 10; In 2004, New York firefighters Mike Bellone and Nicholas DeMasi went public to say they had found the black boxes at the World Trade Center, but were told to keep their mouths shut by FBI agents. Nicholas DeMasi said that he escorted federal agents on an all-terrain vehicle in October 2001 and helped them locate the devices, a story backed up by rescue volunteer Mike Bellone.
As the Philadelphia Daily News reported at the time, “Their story raises the question of whether there was a some type of cover-up at Ground Zero.”
CS – Number 11 – Hundreds of eye witnesses including first responders, fire captains, news reporters, and police, all described multiple explosions in both towers before and during the collapse.
CS – Number 12; An astounding video uncovered from the archives shows BBC News correspondent Jane Standley reporting on the collapse of WTC Building 7 over twenty minutes before it fell at 5:20pm on the afternoon of 9/11. Tapes from earlier BBC broadcasts show news anchors discussing the collapse of WTC 7 a full 26 minutes in advance. The BBC at first claimed that their tapes from 9/11 had been “lost” before admitting that they made the “error” of reporting the collapse of WTC 7 before it happened without adequately explaining how they could have obtained advance knowledge of the event.
In addition, over an hour before the collapse of WTC 7, at 4:10pm, CNN’s Aaron Brown reported that the building “has either collapsed, or is collapsing.”
CS – Number 13; Solicitor General Ted Olson’s claim that his wife Barbara Olsen called him twice from Flight 77, describing hijackers with box cutters, was a central plank of the official 9/11 story.
However, the credibility of the story was completely undermined after Olsen kept changing his story about whether his wife used her cell phone or the airplane phone. The technology to enable cell phone calls from high-altitude airline flights was not created until 2004. American Airlines confirmed that Flight 77 was a Boeing 757 and that this plane did not have airplane phones on board.
According to the FBI, Barbara Olsen attempted to call her husband only once and the call failed to connect, therefore Olsen must have been lying when he claimed he had spoken to his wife from Flight 77.
CS – Number 14; The size of a Boeing 757 is approximately 125ft in width and yet images of the impact zone at the Pentagon supposedly caused by the crash merely show a hole no more than 16ft in diameter. The engines of the 757 would have punctured a hole bigger than this, never mind the whole plane. Images before the partial collapse of the impact zone show little real impact damage and a sparse debris field completely inconsistent with the crash of a large jetliner, especially when contrasted with other images showing airplane crashes into buildings.
CS – Number 15; What is the meaning behind the following quote attributed to Dick Cheney which came to light during the 9/11 Commission hearings? The passage is taken from testimony given by then Secretary of Transportation Norman Mineta.
During the time that the airplane was coming in to the Pentagon, there was a young man who would come in and say to the Vice President, “The plane is 50 miles out.” “The plane is 30 miles out.” And when it got down to “the plane is 10 miles out,” the young man also said to the Vice President, “Do the orders still stand?” And the Vice President turned and whipped his neck around and said, “Of course the orders still stand. Have you heard anything to the contrary?”
As the plane was not shot down, in addition to the fact that armed fighter jets were nowhere near the plane and the Pentagon defensive system was not activated, are we to take it that the orders were to let the plane find its target?
CS – Number 16; In May 2003, the Miami Herald reported how the Bush administration was refusing to release a 900-page congressional report on 9/11 because it wanted to “avoid enshrining embarrassing details in the report,” particularly regarding pre-9/11 warnings as well as the fact that the hijackers were trained at U.S. flight schools.
CS – Number 17; Top Pentagon officials cancelled their scheduled flights for September 11th on September 10th. San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown, following a security warning, cancelled a flight into New York that was scheduled for the morning of 9/11.
CS – Number 18; The technology to enable cell phone calls from high-altitude airline flights was not created until 2004, and even by that point it was only in the trial phase. Calls from cell phones which formed an integral part of the official government version of events were technologically impossible at the time.
CS – Number 19: On April 29, 2004, President Bush and V.P. Cheney would only meet with the commission under specific clandestine conditions. They insisted on testifying together and not under oath. They also demanded that their testimony be treated as a matter of “state secret.” To date, nothing they spoke of that day exists in the public domain.
CS – And finally Mr. President – Number 20; A few days after the attack, several newspapers as well as the FBI reported that a paper passport had been found in the ruins of the WTC. In August 2004, CNN reported that 9/11 hijacker Ziad Jarrah’s visa was found in the remains of Flight 93 which went down in Shanksville, Pennsylvania.
At least a third of the WTC victim’s bodies were vaporized and many of the victims of the Pentagon incident were burned beyond recognition. And yet visas and paper passports which identify the perpetrators and back up the official version of events miraculously survive explosions and fires that we are told melted steel buildings.
(The Senior aide appears again beside the President whispering in his ear. He then quickly moves off).
PBO – Well Charlie I can’t say this hasn’t been interesting. As I said earlier you’ve showed up today focused and organized. Regardless how I feel about the material you’ve presented, I must commend your dedication and zeal. However, our time here is up.
(the President rises from his chair , I do the same).
CS – Mr. President! One more second!
(The President starts towards the door – I follow him quickly step for step).
CS – Mr. President, I implore you based on the evidence you now possess, to use your Executive Power. Prove to us all Sir, that you do, in fact, care. Create a truly comprehensive and open Congressional investigation of 9/11 and its aftermath. The families deserve the truth, the American people and the rest of the free world deserve the truth. Mr. President -
(He pauses. We shake hands).
CS – Make sure you’re on the right side of history.
(The President breaks the handshake).
PBO – I am on the right side of history. Thank you Charlie, my staff and I will be in touch.
(I watch as he strides gracefully out of the room, the truth I provided him held firmly by his side; in the hand of providence.)
————————————————————————————————————————
A comprehensive bibliography containing all of the evidence presented above can be viewed at http://www.prisonplanet.com/20_minutes_bibliography.html
Get this interview in PDF format here.
Author’s Note: What you have just read didn’t actually happen… yet.
This is an open letter to the President requesting a new investigation.
Charlie Sheen.
Charlie Sheen is going to be on Alex Jones’ syndicated radio show live twice this week. This letter to the President is only the opening salvo in a chain of key events. Read more details here and tune in at 11am CST when Alex will lay out this exciting new development. Sheen first appeared on The Alex Jones Show in March 2006 to air his doubts about the official 9/11 story, an interview that garnered national attention and put the issue of 9/11 truth at the forefront of public debate.
For media requests on this subject email sheen@infowars.com.
-
- Social bookmarks
- Email this article
-
- Print this page
- Share on Twitter
September 8th, 2009 at 7:52 am
wow! this is incredible. I really hope Obama follows up on THIS!
jim from FL Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 8:20 am
Charlie Sheen : THE REAL DEAL
diedaily Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 8:51 am
Absolutely! Balls the size of TEXAS! Right on sheen! You give us hope!
Newspeak Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 9:36 am
If there is a lack of further investigation, any failure to address Mr. Sheen’s highly documented concerns, we will know on which side the POTUS has stood, is currently standing, and will remain standing.
When evidence (nano-thermite found at Ground Zero) was delivered to a CA judge as proof of Treason the judge effectively asked the Patriot, “What am I supposed to do with this?”
YOU ARE TO AT ALL TIMES SEEK JUSTICE!
If justice is not sought after, with passion, we then have a failed state. AG Eric Holder has failed in his position. It then becomes the DUTY of the Free People of the United States to alter or abolish the “agreement” we have with those that have been “elected” to represent the People.
Charlie Sheen is a Patriot.
We must follow his example.
We know who the traitors are. They voted for bailouts. They dismiss true concerns, backed with hard evidence, as “conspiracy theory”. The People must bring about justice if their representatives do not.
Ashton Kutcher Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 9:38 am
BHO called Charlie a “young man”.
Hahahahackhackha!
general Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 10:26 am
Be nice to charlie, we have all gone through the process of trying to beg to our masters to restore the republic. The sold out leaders are only interested in money and power. When barry says he wants us to move on, he does not mean move on to restore the republic he means move on with the NWO and flu pandemics and martial law. Thanks again charlie, don’t take the flu vaccine shot cause I am sure they have a special one for you now.
FreedomOfSpeech Reply:
September 12th, 2009 at 12:23 am
Okay, NOW Charlie Sheen is getting weird! Conducting a fantasy interview with STALIN??
http://www.flickr.com/photos/4.....910933347/
WTF?
showmebby Reply:
September 13th, 2009 at 6:08 pm
WE HAVE YOUR BACK AJ , CHARLIE, JASON, AND ALL TRUTH SEEKERS. OBAMA WE HAVE QUESTIONS.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d77qKhTet0E
—FREE HUMANITY—
come on Reply:
September 11th, 2009 at 1:37 pm
Author’s Note: What you have just read didn’t actually happen… yet.
Zeitgeist-NY Reply:
September 11th, 2009 at 3:13 pm
I love the fact that he is coming to the public again. Its great that its been 8 years now the movement is still going strong.
http://www.zeitgeist-ny.com
Julian Reply:
September 12th, 2009 at 9:14 pm
The truth about religion, did you know that there was another Son of God? His name was Melchizedek,
http://www.transcendpolarisati.....merian.htm
Unconquered Reply:
September 13th, 2009 at 5:40 pm
“Author’s Note: What you have just read didn’t actually happen… yet. ”
WTF? Didn’t happen?! This is FICTION?! This shouldn’t even be on this site if this is fake. If this is not real this has ZERO credibility, Charlie has ZERO credibility and I seriously have to question AJ’s editorial decision to even post this. Someone please tell me Sheen actually confronted Obama on 9-11 with the poise and control that he’s written here.
prisoner Reply:
September 13th, 2009 at 7:48 pm
FInally the comment are open again?? wow.
-
I just want to say Alex is making a big mistake letting kids with short tempers run the prisonplanet.com forums.
There is no freedom of speech on the pp.com forums.
I said something someone named “SANE” didn’t agree with and I got banned for that reason alone. I didn’t do anything against the forum “rules”. I have been a member for several years and enjoyed conversations on the forums, and now I can’t even go back because some punk admin didn’t like what I was saying. It’s a shame pp.com forum can’t exercise the rights it prides itself in trying to protect.
Shame on you forum ADMIN.
Seems like I lose more respect for infowars.com/prisonplanet.com everyday.
DD Reply:
September 15th, 2009 at 10:08 am
It seems very few people read the disclaimer. hell this was a waste of my time! The fantasy D&D (Dungeons & Dragons) Charlie S. Interview. I want to play barack next!
Mike barber Reply:
September 12th, 2009 at 3:21 am
THAT’S WATS Up CHARLIE UR THE BOSS
Too Big To Fail Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 8:35 am
I’m a little surprised that Barry didn’t pop a cap in his ass right there. If this is just a taste of what’s coming up, I’m very excited!!
Timothy Bledsoe Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 8:36 am
You have GOT to be kidding: like THAT is ever gonna happen.
Rottweilerson Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 8:45 am
I just got the chills reading that. I thought CS was going to end up kissing The Pres. ass at first, then i thought it was not a real peice. Is this for real? If it is, I just gained a whole new respect for Charlie Sheen. –Rott
Drock Reply:
September 12th, 2009 at 7:14 am
This didn’t actually happen. Charlie wrote this “conversation” in hopes that the president will actually talk to him. Barack was not involved in this. So the first few lines where the President is saying how much he loves “two and a half men” is Charlie patting his crazy self on the back. And he used the wrong “your” at the end, spell check maybe?
Harold G Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 8:52 am
Obama probably won’t follow up on it opening himself up to questions about it until he leaves office. This will be on public record so he will constantly be dogged by it until he has to address it in some fashion.
Great pointed question by Sheen, someone that has the ability to meet with Obama should have done this and he did. nobody else has stepped up to the plate so you gotta give Sheen respect for his effort.
Marc Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 9:15 am
Harold,right on.I just told my friends that.THAT is the key!
It is now PUBLIC RECORD
Daz Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 8:53 am
Thanks Charlie – you have sure have some balls my friend – knew you could never let it drop
RESPECT and GOD BLESS
marc Reply:
September 11th, 2009 at 3:17 pm
he didnt say anything yet, i thought he had balls too until it said this was the work of imagination, the conversation didnt happen
playalong Reply:
September 11th, 2009 at 10:10 pm
It was the dress rehearsal and a chance to “heads’ up ” the rest of us. Now, if you aren’t anticipating, demanding and paying attention to the Pres’s response….you don’t want to be informed. What CS has done is pose the hard questions. The rest is up to the peeps! I for one, feel more informed today than yesterday….if even 1/4 of that stuff is true..@#%^*!! And we’re over in the middle east, trying to show then how to have democracy? Please!
TONY Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 8:56 am
Please DIGG this story!
http://digg.com/politics/Charl.....rack_Obama
eric Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 8:58 am
the turds have been superpolished… i dont think bark would have sat down to here all this for 20 min … barky doesnt have the intestinal fortitude for that much truth … no matter how much of a fan he is of charlies 2.5 men … barky is not a person of truth but of deceit and his skin would be itching so hard after 10 min of hearing the purported info that he would have been off to the shower to break off the cold sweat….
Seriously Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 10:56 am
Charlie should have had him read it from a tele-prompter. He he. Exciting stuff.
Ozdude Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 9:02 am
and of course the most famous, the Gulf of Tonkin incident.
PBO – Of course I am familiar with these historical events and I’m aware that there’s a measure of controversy surrounding them. But to be quite frank with you, this is all ancient history.
Oooher! Barry.. you just f#$%ked yourself up, BIG TIME!
BUT – I also get the feeling this isn’t real. If this is what AJ is talking about for a few days – why isn’t this already in the news?… Hmmm. Are we being had? If so..I’m out for good.
marc Reply:
September 11th, 2009 at 3:18 pm
it sasy it didnt happen….. yet, i doubt it will happen
Isair Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 9:05 am
He wont, but atleast now he is acutely aware of what’s in the minds of people all over the world.
Perhaps now he and his handlers will think twice about staging yet another attack.
doa Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 9:08 am
obama wont follow up on s---. he knows whats up…and he knows 9/11 was an inside job…he just CANT divulge it without the sheeples waking up en mass.
Imagine the headline “Obama admits 9/11 inside job” on every major newspaper.
teh sheeples wouldn’t know WTF to do.
it would be the same as
“shadow govt runs US says Obama”
economic collapse, societal unrest, etc..would soon follow…
those of us armed with the truth are few and far between, but our numbers are growing.
the info war is real, the shadow government is real, and we are in a fight for our lives..
God bless Charlie Sheen, Alex Jones, Steven Jonens, and all the others whos work has led us to this point..keep the momentum up, and all of you keep recruiting infowarriors!!!
Areid73 Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 9:10 am
There’s no way this is going to make a shred of difference, but I commend Charlie’s zeal, like the President says.
There’s about as much chance of this Wall Street-sponsored suit abolishing the Fed as investigating 9/11.
New boss – same as the old boss
huh Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 9:14 am
Follows up on this? Are you serious?
It sounds like he has no interest in following up on this. He said it’s “history”.
marc Reply:
September 11th, 2009 at 3:19 pm
he didnt say it someone sed he would say it, it didnt happen, just what he thinks might happen, but it wont go anything like that
LookforVeracity Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 9:22 am
CS has been doing this for a while him and his father are very patriotic.
Mitch Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 9:37 am
charlie you are a true effing patriot
Richard Poullin Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 9:38 am
Commendable work by Charlie as always, but an Anti-Climax around the Infowars Hype for this event. R
TY Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 10:23 am
PAUL/SHEEN 2012
come on Reply:
September 11th, 2009 at 1:37 pm
I hope you all didn’t miss the part at the end where it says ”
Author’s Note: What you have just read didn’t actually happen… yet.”
Woodbourne Reply:
September 11th, 2009 at 4:54 pm
Here’s my favorite – quote mining at it’s absolute best
On pages two and three, sir, are the statements, as well, from commission co-chairmen Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton, commissioners Bob Kerrey, Timothy Roemer and John Lehman, as well as the statements of commissioner Max Cleland, an ex-Senator from Georgia , who resigned, stating:
“It is a national scandal. This investigation is now compromised. One of these days we will have to get the full story because the 9/11 issue is so important to America. But this White House wants to cover it up.”
—were made in the early days of the investigation before the commissioners actually got what they were asking for in terms of funding and cooperation. This is in very clear in Kean’s book if you want to read it – initial problem which they “overcome” is the correct quote.
Birther Reply:
September 11th, 2009 at 10:58 pm
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Charlie Sheen drunk again… he is a waste of air and sperm… Please Charlie reduce your own carbon footprint…
LKROSSS Reply:
September 11th, 2009 at 11:37 pm
“What you have just read didn’t actually happen… yet.”
You´ll find this sentence at the end of the “interview”.
Hank Reply:
September 12th, 2009 at 2:54 am
The sinking of the RMS Lusitania was not the only factor that brought the US into WW1. The Zimmerman Note, was also a major factor. Maybe Mr. Sheen should follow his advice, and read up on history! Not everything is a conspiracy…
FocusPeople Reply:
September 12th, 2009 at 10:17 pm
While this is true, our government is ridiculously prepared to take advantage of and manipulate world events to it’s own advantage. The Lusitania? Ok, now that you’ve gotten that out of your system, could we go back to the subject at hand here??
jake hancox Reply:
September 13th, 2009 at 1:09 am
this is exactly the sort of ignorance the very word “conspiracy” perpetuates.
let me explain… when we say it is a conspiracy nobody actually thinks theres some evil council of men sitting around dreaming this stuff up…. it is the combined effect of lobbying groups from oil, tobacco, arms dealers, finance groups and special iterest business ventures that flood the system with so much red tape and misinformation that the people are in no way informed as to where they stand.
as a result people in power have an oportunity to direct events to their political and financial gain.
i would trace the start of this modern trend to the council of senator constantine in rome, but it is a mainstay of the human race.
not everything is a conspiracy…. but we shouldent be silenced by people like yourself who want to fob off valid claims….
i must agree with focuspeople above:
this is one of few issues i myself am not aware of the details of…. but it was just one more example.
with what charlie has set out to do he does not have the man power or personall ability to proove every conspiracy theory in history. and you know it… your avoiding the subject at hand
Hank Reply:
September 16th, 2009 at 6:36 pm
Don’t get me wrong, everyone has the right to their own opinion, and I would never take that away from anyone.
I just don’t subscribe to the conspiracy theories…
Just call me a skeptic.
Frances Dee Reply:
September 13th, 2009 at 11:49 am
Mr. Sheen,
I am the daughter of a veteran of of 3 war’s, my father was in the oss, was shot down twice
reveived the french medal of honor, & many other medal’s, two brother’s died in Vietnam
My father stated that he would like to give his medals back to the president because his way
of life that he fought for is no more! He & I are aware of the methods of operation our government is involved in, it’s all about money we are pawn’s.
See the book: The Monster from Jekyll Island = IRS
I thank you for your effort’s
Frances Dee
Jordan M. L. Reply:
September 13th, 2009 at 9:17 pm
Charlie, I greatly appreciate and respect what you are trying to do. Please keep trying, because I know there is plenty of people out there who will hop on board with you!
Alex Reply:
September 14th, 2009 at 3:41 pm
Number 2.
That One Really Bothered Me And Caught My Attention.
Why Isn’t Anyone Making A Big Deal Out Of That!!
That Is Seriously A Huge Problem That Must Be Addressed!!!
Jeff Reply:
September 14th, 2009 at 5:15 pm
Guys, read the comments…. This is not real. We could all only wish that it was. Obama isn’t going to make time to sit down with anyone to discuss something like this.
charlie Reply:
September 14th, 2009 at 7:05 pm
Fasinating piece,fiction if nothing else,I still have trouble with the whole notion of a “big conspriacy”,I mean i have watched them take down buildings b4,nothing of this size or scope and it takes weeks and literally 100’s of people to prep these buildings,yet we are to believe this was undertaken with the utmost of secrectcy and yet 8 years later NOT one person can has ever leaked any bit of credible information,I wish Mr Sheen the best with his endevour,but it just sounds like sour grapes from hollywood who were promised “all this change&transperancy” and got the typical DC runaround,remember,it doesnt matter which party,they will say ANYTHING to get elected and do little or nothing to back it up,Mr Obama has a bigger problem right now,let him and congress straighten out this mess THEY created and maybee then he can get his “20 minutes with the President”
Amanda Reply:
September 15th, 2009 at 3:09 pm
THEY are not going to fix what THEY have created and keep creating. I can not believe you do not see that.
DD Reply:
September 15th, 2009 at 10:04 am
We need an investigatyion. I thought this was a real interview till I read the bottom disclaimer. What kind of games ? What was the intent? Our Govt. is not the same that was formed by our forefathers.
Tom Taylor Reply:
September 16th, 2009 at 1:52 am
Charlie Sheen for President!
What a good job he did standing up for the rest of us patriots
This is the type of stuff we expect our elected leaders and the media to do.
I was amazed at how Sheen could deliver those 20 points in 5 minutes. I know I couldn’t.
If you can’t do what Charlie did in 5 minutes try these 3 questions in less that 30 seconds:
1. How do 2 skyscrapers disintegrate into dust and the speed of gravity like a controlled demolition?
2. How does building 7 also disintegrate like a controlled demolition having not been hit?
3. How come the Pentagon (the most secure building on the planet) has never released its videotapes of an actual plane hitting the pentagon?
The next 20 minutes Charlie Sheen gets to spend with the president he can ask:
1. What part of the federal government is the Federal Reserve?
2. How does a private corporation with unknown stockholders in the Federal Reserve never get audited?
3. When the Federal Reserve prints trillions of dollars is that not taxation without representation?
4. Why are international treaties subverting our basic constitutional right to grow our own food and sell it to our neighbors?
5. Why does the patriot act suspend habeas corpus and why has that not been restored to us?
6. Why is there any retirement plan for any federally elected officials when they win just one term in office?
7. Why is the equation for inflations changed (leaving out fuel and food) so social security recipients get cheated while the postal department continues to raise the price of a 1st class stamps.
8. Why hasn’t the posse comitatus law been re-enacted to protect the American citizens from Federal Troops (remember Katrina)?
9. Why does our government continue to lie to us about 9/11, inflation, Federal Reserve, swine flu and our Constitutional Rights.
10. When we reopen the 9/11 investigation, can we revisit: The Kennedy assassination, USS Liberty, Ruby Ridge, Waco, and Oklahoma City bombing (John Doe II)?
11. Since the National Guard is not the militia, where is our “well regulated militia” provided to us in the constitution?
12. Why is our Constitution and Bill of Right routinely ignored by elected official who are sworn to up hold it?
There, Charlie, that should get you started.
Chelsi Reply:
September 20th, 2009 at 11:37 am
Dude, Charlie I have to say that you roasted the president’s ass right there.
He gave you no real answers to the questions that you asked, but his actions when you presented the questions speak louder than his words.
Way to F**king go!
September 8th, 2009 at 7:52 am
I knew Sheen would be back!
diedaily Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 8:51 am
For the attack!
September 8th, 2009 at 7:57 am
Thank you Charlie, you are a patriot and a true activist.
roaddog6 Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 8:10 am
how does c.s. get to be there? He’s just a hollywood movie star. I don’t know man. Is this article for real?
hckyslf28 Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 8:29 am
I think the reason Sheen got to interview Obama is because he is a celebrity, and Obama wasn”t expecting any dificult questions
Sad monkey Obama Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 9:01 am
True , Obama hides from the “Hard” questions!!
osuredleg Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 8:30 am
Yeah, I’m with you there man. The whole tiem I was reading this article, I was waiting for the punch line where CS wakes up and says that it was all a dream or he made this up as a “what I would ask the President if I ever got to interview him” sort of thing. So…I guess we will “find out” in a couple more hours if this is real, and what else is going on. I’m still keeping my guard up, as this gives me a weird feeling in my stomach. Even if Obama were to say that he was looking into 9/11, etc., I wouldn’t really trust him.
marc Reply:
September 11th, 2009 at 3:21 pm
no its not, u must have missed the end saying it didnt happen yet.
pfft Reply:
September 11th, 2009 at 9:11 pm
AUTORS NOTE ON BOTTOM OF PAGE THIS INTERVIEW HASENT HAPPENED YET PLEASE READ ENTIRE ARTICLE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
DONT GET EXCITED LIKE I DID
pfft Reply:
September 11th, 2009 at 9:11 pm
hasnt*
Will Reply:
September 12th, 2009 at 11:18 pm
roaddog66, didn’t you read the whole article? Didn’t anyone read the whole article??
It says: Author’s Note: What you have just read didn’t actually happen… yet.
Timothy Bledsoe Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 8:36 am
Yes, Thank you Charlie.
September 8th, 2009 at 8:01 am
my jaw is just hanging open right now…….
September 8th, 2009 at 8:04 am
what else does Obama read from?
HHAHA Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 8:32 am
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
diedaily Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 8:54 am
The communist manifesto? Rules for radicals? Doomsday for dummies?
September 8th, 2009 at 8:05 am
Wow, great news.
September 8th, 2009 at 8:05 am
Show me another source which confirms this and I’ll be impressed.
September 8th, 2009 at 8:06 am
Wow. This is great. Thanks Charlie you are a Patriot indeed.
September 8th, 2009 at 8:06 am
This would appear to be the momentous event, Mr. Jones spoke of.
HHAHA Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 8:33 am
It certainly is.
September 8th, 2009 at 8:08 am
THANK YOU CHARLIE! YOU ARE A PATRIOT!
September 8th, 2009 at 8:08 am
Oh Wow this shizz is big go Alex my man
September 8th, 2009 at 8:14 am
Go Charlie GO!!!!
September 8th, 2009 at 8:14 am
Wow, he interviews the puppet as if he weren’t aware it was an inside job… um bilderberg? the grove? *yawn*
doa Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 9:09 am
yeah….you are right….the shadow govt has a BIG spotlight on them right now….
September 8th, 2009 at 8:16 am
Incredible. Now there is no excuse for Barack Obama. His administration must investigate this matter or collapse into flames. The choice is theirs.
Or rather... Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 8:57 am
…kindly give up in the Infowar and drop the act. They KNOW it’s an inside job!
jake hancox Reply:
September 13th, 2009 at 1:22 am
lol im with you and appreciate your enthusiasim,
but…. he HAS to act ???
why? because of insurmountable inarguable evidence?
didnt stop bush for 8 years……
September 8th, 2009 at 8:17 am
its like telling the corrupt police commissioner that his officers are corrupt.
Shanghai Spike Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 8:45 am
EXACTLY! “Obama” already knows all about what Sheen presented him with;
indeed he was briefed by Bush/ Cheney years before he was “INSTALLED”
as president BY THE ILLUMINATI.
If THIS is the BIG NEWS, ITS A HELL OF A PIKER; NO NEWS AT ALL.
OBAMA IS A LIAR. HE WILL DO NOTHING BUT FURTHER THE
DISSOLUTION OF OUR REPUBLIC.
SgtCrom Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 9:19 am
Yes, of course Obama already knows 9/11 was an inside job. And of course he’s not going to do anything about it. BUT there are a lot of other folks out there, hypnotized by their TV sets, who have not yet seen the points that Charlie Sheen presented to the president.
The fact that Sheen IS a celebrity will make these points available to a vast number of people who would otherwise not have seen them. The more people who read this interview, the more people will start asking questions and the more pressure will be on Obama to respond to these issues publicly.
Remember, there is no such thing as bad publicity. It’s a major coup in exposing the people to 9/11 truth, the eugenics plans of the NWO and to the infowar.
I’m interested in seeing how the s---birds on TV will spin this.
jake hancox Reply:
September 13th, 2009 at 1:27 am
god dammit! do you people realise how much damage you do to the cause…. granted there are alot of cover ups of huge importance….. but Illuminati?….. NWO??
cmon people be realistic, i apreciate AJs enthusiasim… but that guy will back anything from moon landings to mind controll microchips….
lets not let the wool be pulled over our eyes….. but listen to logic reason, and historical fact. not every rumour in the wood work.
September 8th, 2009 at 8:17 am
This is some mind blowing stuff…. Wow. What’s next?
September 8th, 2009 at 8:20 am
I have to agree with Simo at this point.
I am behind Alex Jones 110% but the language that PBO is using is too well put together to be an on-the-spot reaction to what is being discussed. I think I will continue to see how this plays out and listen to the broadcast today to get the real story.
There are two rays of light in this situation…Alex Jones and Ron Paul…they are the two different sides of the same coin. Listen to what they have to say, absorb it, contemplate it.
Then pick up the Bible and see where those two rays of light originate. Trust in the Lord…it’s you’re only real way out of this mess.
LKROSSS Reply:
September 11th, 2009 at 11:18 pm
It is NOT real. It´s a work of fiction. You probably missed the the a photo of C.S. writing it. There’s a declaration, written all over the place, in this page, saying this interview didn´t happened “…yet”.
So, it is NOT real. It is suposed to make you think, that´s all.
BE THE TRUTH Reply:
September 12th, 2009 at 11:19 am
freakin drones, quit believing everything you freakin read! omg!!! WAKE UP AND SMELL THE NAPALM YOU f---S!!! So tired of listening to the dumb asses thinking they know something but cant even cipher the bottom part when it says IT IS NOT REAL!!! LISTEN TO THE DAYM NEWS CAST ALEX GAVE US!!! OMG!!! start reading everything….. i am so sick and tired of the clones and drones that walk the face of this planet… YOU GET WHAT YOU DESERVE!!! When your freedoms are gone, and you are standing in a meal line with a chip in your head is when you wake up??? I hope it happens so people will pull their head out of their ass and wake the hell up. THIS IS NOT A DREAM LAND! THIS IS REAL LIFE!!! REAL PEOPLE LOST LOVED ONES!!! But you dont care until it happens to you. Stupid humans… I have no pity for those who f--- everyone else out of their basic, natural right to live without interference of our government…. WHAT HAPPENED TO SELF GOVERNMENT??? Is this a way for people to deal with things? duck your head in the sand like some ostrage???? YOU GET WHAT YOU DESERVE IF YOU DONT MAKE A STAND AND FIGHT!!!!
Thanks Alex for not being a drone/clone and being a voice for all true patriots
Charlie Sheen, you are a role model for being a human (not just a man) and standing up for the truth
To the rest, wake up or end up a ENSLAVED by your own Gov.
To Obama, be a real person and stand up for what is right!!! JFK DID, and yeah he got shot…. be a man like he was… He sacrificed his entire life to do the RIGHT THING YOU SELF-Righteous COWARD!!!
BE THE TRUTH Reply:
September 12th, 2009 at 11:24 am
poor english, my fault and poor language… but man…. come on!
* To the rest, wake up or end up an enslaved mind-less drone owned by the Gov.
There… passion was too high but tired of the stupidity and ignorance. I should not be mad at the people. I should be mad at the educational system. Thank God my parents educated me to compliment my state-issued education.
debra Reply:
September 12th, 2009 at 11:08 pm
Almost everyone is already their SLAVE – you became a government slave / property when you were issued with a BIRTH CERTIFICATE – do your research on this & sovereignty.
Look at ADMIRALTY / MARITIME LAW & you will find that is why the Government Child Services can remove / abduct your child = because they own it – not you – you only THINK you do…. the whole game is one of smoke & mirrors & we need to awaken as many people as possible to the fact that this game has been going on for too long & enough is enough – no more terror & false flag ops, no more Corporate Wars (see the google video MONEYMASTERS) – Knowledge is power which is why your ignorance is bliss for these monsters. Peace,love & freedom to all ….
September 8th, 2009 at 8:20 am
I’ve never liked Charlie Sheen’s politics, but this is impressive, and if it is a true account, I have to commend him for his brave effort.
Buckwheat Cakes Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 8:54 am
IF its a true account.
There’s nobody to corroborate if this ever actually transpired.
Damn good theater, though, in a day when “theater” is
EVERYTHING and TRUTH don’t mean s---!
marc Reply:
September 11th, 2009 at 3:34 pm
it ddnt happen
Umm... Reply:
September 12th, 2009 at 7:09 am
Try reading the whole thing next time:
*** Author’s Note: What you have just read didn’t actually happen… yet. ***
September 8th, 2009 at 8:22 am
Charlie, i love you!
September 8th, 2009 at 8:22 am
Any comment from the WH or Osamabama bin Soetoro out there about this?
Hile Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 8:28 am
Evidence or an audio/ video recording of the incident? A comment from anyone on the record about this?
Wait and see…
LKROSSS Reply:
September 11th, 2009 at 11:24 pm
It is NOT real. It´s a work of fiction. You probably missed the the a photo of C.S. writing it. There’s a declaration, written all over the place, in this page, saying this interview didn´t happened “…yet”.
So, it is NOT real. It is suposed to make you think, that´s all.
September 8th, 2009 at 8:22 am
Wow! I will definately be listening today. It seemed to me that the president was aware of what Charlie was saying, and when he said they just wanted to protect us I about lost it! Let’s hope he actually does something, I mean he is still speaking to our kids today, well not mine. I just can’t shake the evil chill when i hear him speak. Job well done, Charlie and Alex. (And everyone behind you guys that we don’t see.)
September 8th, 2009 at 8:23 am
Keep spreading the Truth. Online Activists. The Tipping Point is near.
September 8th, 2009 at 8:24 am
Charlie Sheen, you are one brave man. May America see many others like you.
FUBAR REPUBLIC Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 8:50 am
“Brave” would have been if Sheen had marched in there
with a troop of Marshals and ARRESTED that FRAUD along
with ALL HIS THUG HENCHMEN!
You think the HEAD GANGSTER is gonna “investigate” the
OTHER GANGSTERS?!
After Sheen left Soetoro was probably yucking it up, saying:
“Imagine that fool thinking I know nothing about OUR PEOPLE
blowing up the WTC!”
diedaily Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 8:57 am
Yeah, you get right on that fubar. Let us know how it goes. We won’t wait up.
September 8th, 2009 at 8:25 am
Wow, what a badass. Charlie Sheen has the BIGGEST BALLS.
disappointed? Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 8:46 am
True dat.
Charlie ‘huevosgrande’ Sheen… he has my respect and thanks.
When the crony whispered in B.O.s ear… was he asking for permission to take Sheen out?
LKROSSS Reply:
September 11th, 2009 at 11:24 pm
It is NOT real. It´s a work of fiction. You probably missed the the a photo of C.S. writing it. There’s a declaration, written all over the place, in this page, saying this interview didn´t happened “…yet”.
It is suposed to make you think, that´s all.
Hervert Reply:
September 12th, 2009 at 8:31 am
once and for all: the interview is a lie?
September 8th, 2009 at 8:25 am
Alex said there would be full revelations throughout the week. Just listen to the show today.
September 8th, 2009 at 8:25 am
Someone lost their job over that interview. I can just imagine the President being pissed. You have to realize that the President must already know all of this. He surly was not allowed to be the President and not know that this took place. It is just my guess but it stands to reason.
September 8th, 2009 at 8:26 am
but he did a great job…
September 8th, 2009 at 8:27 am
Holy s---. Good work Charlie
September 8th, 2009 at 8:27 am
Obama has in his hands the fate of America. He can act to heal the nation, or continue to poison it with the darkness of ignorance and deceit. No longer can he deny that he does not have the facts. Charlie Sheen did a remarkable job in presenting the hard evidence in a very short time span. For the President to deny any further time for Charlie screams of Obama running scared. He is hiding behind his handlers. I hope, for the sake of the victims of 911, that he grows a spine. Regardless of what Obama does, America is undergoing an Awakening. He can choose to be with us, or choose the path of treason.
diedaily Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 8:59 am
Obama has virtually no power compared to what you’re saying UNLESS he gets the people behind him. That would take a miracle of disclosure.
September 8th, 2009 at 8:27 am
It does read like his responses are scripted .
if this is for real it could be Obama trying to put the s---s up cheney, a kind of “hey, stop criticizing me or I’ll open up a new investigation and expose some embarrassing facts” .
marc Reply:
September 11th, 2009 at 3:39 pm
it was scripted, it didnt happen!!
LKROSSS Reply:
September 11th, 2009 at 11:26 pm
NOT real. It´s a work of fiction. You probably missed the the a photo of C.S. writing it. There’s a declaration, written all over the place, in this page, saying this interview didn´t happened “…yet”.
It is suposed to make you think, that´s all.
September 8th, 2009 at 8:27 am
Any hope that could come from this comes from the belief that the president didn’t already know all of this. As if !!!!
September 8th, 2009 at 8:28 am
Thank You Mr. Sheen!
I am very saddened, though, because I feel our President will not follow up on this whatsoever. He made it clear in his responses.
Porf Reply:
September 13th, 2009 at 5:27 pm
My God are you that dumb? This interview didn’t really happen!!
September 8th, 2009 at 8:28 am
“You’re the President of the United States, the leader of the free world”
What the ****** ****?
September 8th, 2009 at 8:28 am
Thank you Charlie Sheen!
September 8th, 2009 at 8:28 am
Brilliant job, Charlie! Extremely well done! Now everybody tkows the President knows the truth. What he does with it is another matter.
Charlie Sheen is a brilliant interviewer. Wow!
Porf Reply:
September 13th, 2009 at 5:28 pm
My God are you that dumb? This interview didn’t really happen!!
September 8th, 2009 at 8:30 am
Good job Charlie. Won’t do any good, but good job anyway. Patriots put it out there inspite of if it will change leadership or not. It changes the people, the common people like me and others. Inspires us to get involved. Makes ready and encourages those to defend in a revolution. Thank You. Now a real question, Who drank Jobu’s Rum?
September 8th, 2009 at 8:30 am
Wow!! I hope that this was filmed because I would love to see the NWO’s puppet’s body language. From his responses he gave, he appear to be surprised that he was not talking to Charlie Sheen the actor but he was talking to a true American!!
Porf Reply:
September 13th, 2009 at 5:28 pm
OMG are you that dumb? This interview didn’t really happen!!
September 8th, 2009 at 8:30 am
My gut feeling is that Obama dumped the folders in the trash on his way out…
jeff Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 9:10 am
amen
September 8th, 2009 at 8:31 am
Wow!
I see charlie in a new light now, that interview was amazing, Obama certainly entertained Sheen’s questions. I wonder if anything will come of this interview??
….And I thought Alex was talking s***e about an amazing feature on infowars, well done Mr Jones, you’ve prooven me wrong!!
Porf Reply:
September 13th, 2009 at 5:29 pm
LMMFAO are you that dumb? This interview didn’t really happen!!
September 8th, 2009 at 8:31 am
Thank you Mr. Sheen and thank you Alex Jones I hope Obama takes advantage of this and gets on the right side before it’s too late! This is awsome stuff and deserves to be paid attention to without a doubt. It’s been too long. Also, just seeing where this goes before the so-called self-annointed “elite” have any further chance of taking this country down will be foremost in my list of things to do. Mr. Sheen’s report states that we have lost a LOT since 9-11 tho I believe we can still fall a lot further, but acknowledgement of these facts can lead down this trail and let everyone see the WHOLE truth about WHO is behind all this…Bildebergs, Rothchilds’, etc and the history behind it all and WHY. The thing I find interresting is how Obama will handle this. Because of Mr. Sheen’s guts and how he was armed with so much evidence, if Obama continues this sherad, we will know where he stands for sure and he will be held as accountable as the rest of these scallywags. On the other hand, should Obama decide to launch an HONEST investigation and the truth comes out, HE ( Obama ) will appear to have been “the one” who lead this investigation and take credit for it as our “savior”. If the latter is the case, I am also wondering how he will hold those responsible to account. Then there’s the scenario of another falsed investigation filled with more lies mixed with half-truths to further confuse and deceive. THIS should be VERY interresting indeed!
September 8th, 2009 at 8:31 am
Whoa! Respect Charlie!
September 8th, 2009 at 8:32 am
Wow. It felt like a dream. Then I realized that Charlie would not toy with us. Wow, Charlie! Wonderful!
Porf Reply:
September 13th, 2009 at 5:31 pm
If it felt like a dream it’s because this interview NEVER ACTUALLY HAPPENED! You people are crazy.
September 8th, 2009 at 8:32 am
VERY WELL DONE , Mr. Sheen !
September 8th, 2009 at 8:33 am
Uh, wow.Obama will just try to ignore this. But now all 9/11 truth seekers will know their savior is bought and paid for.
doa Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 9:13 am
duh…we already knew that…”our savior?” hardly!!! NWO puppet? ..for sure!!
September 8th, 2009 at 8:33 am
God bless you, Charlie!!!
You’ve got guts, and guts is enough! (I know, wrong Vietnam movie, but it still applies.)
September 8th, 2009 at 8:33 am
It’s going to be interesting to see how this unfolds in the mainstream media…
Disappointed Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 8:45 am
It won’t. It will be swept under the rug or at best dismissed by the talking heads as an ambush on the Messiah by crazy conspiracy theorist Charlie Sheen.
diedaily Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 9:01 am
Oh, you just wait. You will not be disappointed for long.
LKROSSS Reply:
September 11th, 2009 at 11:27 pm
It´s a work of fiction
Porf Reply:
September 13th, 2009 at 5:32 pm
Why would the idiots in the mainstream media report on an interview that NEVER TOOK PLACE? Seriously, are some of you people off your meds?
September 8th, 2009 at 8:35 am
this is amazing! sheen breaking out his wearechange!!!
September 8th, 2009 at 8:35 am
Thanks Charlie and Alex Jones for this, it really is some big news.
Porf Reply:
September 13th, 2009 at 5:33 pm
What’s big news? A fake interview with Obama? HAHAHAHAHAHAHA you guys are a sad bunch.
September 8th, 2009 at 8:36 am
Anybody else think Charlie looks like an old woman in that photo?
I didn’t even know it was him until I read his name.
September 8th, 2009 at 8:36 am
The Prez got schooled by Charlie Sheen. LOL… ya gotta love it.
Porf Reply:
September 13th, 2009 at 5:34 pm
LOL are you serious dude? This interview didn’t really happen!!
September 8th, 2009 at 8:36 am
Wow…
Hope there is video or audio reccording of this interview…
If there is, and it makes it to the mainstream news, there must be some kind of official reaction from the administration.
Charlie sure has som big cojones.
Respect!
Porf Reply:
September 13th, 2009 at 5:34 pm
Sure, an audio or video recording of a fake interview? LMAO you people are crazy. Learn to read folks…this didn’t really happen.
September 8th, 2009 at 8:37 am
This is cool, but don’t you think the Pres. already knew a lot about this, and was probably playing dumb to avoid any sort of accountability? I’m afraid that might be it. Lots of courage by Sheen, especially when he listed the civil rights abuses continued by Obama- I would have liked to see the look on his face. Hopefully the Pres. got back and that is the big announcement!
LKROSSS Reply:
September 11th, 2009 at 11:27 pm
work of fiction
September 8th, 2009 at 8:37 am
The President was just as smooth and prepared as Charlie Sheen. He seemed to be VERY familiar with all the “conspiracy theory” arguments, even going so far as to have the PNAC document’s “New Pearl Harbor” text memorized? His response was too ready– he had definitely done his homework to be prepared for this type of questioning.
This is very telling. Obama has studied the 9/11 conspiracy issue in detail! Why would the President know the issues backwards and forwards if they are completely unfounded and “kooky”?
rexmundi Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 9:27 am
Obama sounds like a HAL2000 without the awareness aspect.
See, Bill Clinton would have had Charlie in tears with his emotional responses, and may very well have converted Charlie from 911 Truth.
It’s amazing. People say Obama is like Carter. I disagree. He’s more of the Reagan style puppet.
Lights, camera, action. Which is better than the stuttering, sputtering, retarded puppet W.
Never get another Clinton.
Joey Rapps Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 9:39 am
To defend his banker masters, at all costs.
Porf Reply:
September 13th, 2009 at 5:35 pm
My God are you that dumb…seriously? This interview didn’t really happen!!
September 8th, 2009 at 8:37 am
hell yeah! lets see what’s up now. I almost have faith something might happen. It has too, the revolution started when the internet was born it just took time to reach maturity.
September 8th, 2009 at 8:37 am
I hope Charlie got a recording of this. Yeah, it sounds so scripted. Either a) this is bulls---, b) Obama really is going to re-open the investigation, and they planned this meeting to sound confrontational, or c) these guys are incredible extemporaneous speakers…
Or rather... Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 9:00 am
It sounds scripted because Obama is an actor.
joe blow Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 11:07 am
or it sounded scripted because what you have just read did not actually happen… yet
September 8th, 2009 at 8:38 am
holy s---!! whole new respect for charlie sheen!! obama won’t do a thing and that BETTER prove to you sheep out there that the left right paradigm is just good cop bad cop…. the divide and conquer tactic meant to enslave us all. great job charlie!!
September 8th, 2009 at 8:39 am
I echo an earlier sentiment that from the answers Obama gave, it would be a real surprise if he does anything with this info. He is part of the problem, not part of the solution. Hope I am wrong, but I don’t see him interupting his agenda to pursue this course. Bush was really bad, but Obama is destined to be much worse if he is not already.
September 8th, 2009 at 8:40 am
Charlie Sheen couldn’t of done a better job in 20 minutes ! True patriot
September 8th, 2009 at 8:41 am
Nice work! Where’s the youtube link too? =)
Porf Reply:
September 13th, 2009 at 5:36 pm
Youtube link to an interview that never really happened?
September 8th, 2009 at 8:41 am
Can I get a collective Holy F’n Crap !
Porf Reply:
September 13th, 2009 at 5:36 pm
“Holy F’n crap, there are a ton if wackos here that think that this interview actually took place”
September 8th, 2009 at 8:42 am
Wow. That is incredible. What an eye opener.
Nice one Charlie
***page posted to Facebook***
September 8th, 2009 at 8:42 am
Wow. If we had a few more InfoWarriors of Sheen’s caliber all taking action, in unison with the rest of us on the grassroots level, it really would be enough to turn the tide.
diedaily Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 9:04 am
We do. It is.
September 8th, 2009 at 8:42 am
Wow, I’m sure that took a lot of courage and prep, go Charlie! I hope this isn’t all what the big news is though b/c it really won’t change anything. Alex was speaking as if it would be something revolutionary. Maybe he knows somehow there will be a new, “real” investigation of 9/11?
September 8th, 2009 at 8:43 am
my mouth is hanging open
good job Charlie!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
hope he’s the special guest on the show today!
Ozdude Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 9:26 am
No. I’d say if OB was the special guest on the show saying HE was going to reopen 9/11. THAT would be the biggest thing EVER!
joe Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 11:04 am
no if this happend i would know that alex jones show is pretty much just bulls--- for us ppl to eat up ultimatly buying time
September 8th, 2009 at 8:43 am
Obama saves the day, exposes 9/11
Perfect… just what we need.
September 8th, 2009 at 8:43 am
When Sheen calls out Obama for following the Bush regime by making idle promises, Obama uses a tactic called deflection to avoid answering these allegations.
When Obama says we need to move forward, he is disrespecting a nation who is still in mourning of 911.
Please, people, DO NOT VOTE FOR ANYONE WHO ISN’T WILLING TO REINVESTIGATE 911!!!!
September 8th, 2009 at 8:44 am
I’d like to hear the tape that this transcript came from. It would be interesting to hear the vocal inflections of each during the conversation.
Porf Reply:
September 13th, 2009 at 5:38 pm
My God are you that dumb dude………..? This interview didn’t really happen!!
September 8th, 2009 at 8:45 am
This is incredible and could be one of the most important steps forward in the history of the 9/11 truth movement! Thank you Charlie Sheen for using your celebrity to get an audience with Obama and for holding Obama to task…very courageously I must add.
Porf Reply:
September 13th, 2009 at 5:38 pm
It’s not incredible since it DIDN’T ACTUALLY HAPPEN!! OMG you people are insane.
September 8th, 2009 at 8:45 am
There is no doubt about it, Charlie is a true Patriot. If and I say IF the tide turns for us, then I change my mind about Obama. Let’s see which way the cat jumps before we get all excited. All the same it was great of Charlie to do this.
September 8th, 2009 at 8:46 am
Where’s the video?
Porf Reply:
September 13th, 2009 at 5:38 pm
Video of what? An interview that didn’t really happen?
September 8th, 2009 at 8:46 am
Excellent job, Charlie! POTUS probably has the true history from all the Presidents’ secret memoirs encoded on the nuclear football laptop…
September 8th, 2009 at 8:47 am
Amazing, absolutely amazing! Spoken with eloquence, articulation, and grace. WHERE’s the mini cam documenting this momentous act?
Porf Reply:
September 13th, 2009 at 5:39 pm
LMMFAO! “Spoken with eloquence, articulation, and grace.”…..dude, this didn’t really happen. You guys are a sad sad bunch!
September 8th, 2009 at 8:47 am
Epic. Viva la resistance!
September 8th, 2009 at 8:48 am
This is very big. I wonder if the controlled main stream media will do any reporting on this? I doubt it
Porf Reply:
September 13th, 2009 at 5:41 pm
Why would they report on something that never happened?
September 8th, 2009 at 8:48 am
The question I have is where are all of the Presidents “uhhs” That’s my only confusion…(hah)
eule Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 8:52 am
the magic word is “transcript”.
September 8th, 2009 at 8:48 am
were is the video or sound of the interview
September 8th, 2009 at 8:50 am
Womp! Womp!
September 8th, 2009 at 8:50 am
Van Jones “outed” as truther
Obama investigates 9/11, becomes hero
Van Jones hailed as genius, reinstated
Everything gets 10x harder to fight.
diedaily Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 9:22 am
Maybe this is just part of his immunity package. Check out world reports dot org.
diedaily Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 9:23 am
oops double…sorry!
September 8th, 2009 at 8:50 am
THANK YOU CHARLIE SHEEM!
September 8th, 2009 at 8:51 am
Obama is a master politician. How many did he fool into thinking he was above politics? When, in fact that schtick was just politics? Now, he still stays those against Govt. Health Care are playing the “same political games”. He has framed the argument in a fascist way just like Bush. While Bush said you’re with us or not patriotic, Obama says you’re with us or you’re just being political. More games is all we’re getting. There were several follow up investigations (3, I think) to the JFK assassination, and they didn’t end the controversy. I think Obama might create another investigation, which, being composed of insiders, might make a few inconsequential concessions about 9/11, but really not do a whole lot. I hope I’m wrong. Well, but I think Obama will be useful for our country in the end. If the master orator who got everyone’s hopes up fails, everyone’s gonna see past this 2 party scheme and we’ll finally get some actual change. Well, I hope.
September 8th, 2009 at 8:51 am
OMFG!!!
Charlie Sheen The Greatest American Hero…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e9Q3orQhEcA
I’m bleeping astounded that this went down..
Not a homo-ghey..
But I have a HUGE mancrush on CS right now!!!
“Those that make peaceful revolution impossible, serve to make violent revolution inevitable..” JFK
Porf Reply:
September 13th, 2009 at 5:42 pm
LOL it didn’t go down. Learn to read dude..this never happened.
September 8th, 2009 at 8:51 am
Wow, just wow!! Way to go Charlie, that’s the way to shake them up.
September 8th, 2009 at 8:51 am
Finally, an American with balls! That is the way EVERY American should do it and demand!
September 8th, 2009 at 8:53 am
Respect Charlie! Good work!
Let’s just hope this goes out to the mainstream media now…
September 8th, 2009 at 8:54 am
I’ll tell you why it’s important, you short sighted DUMBASS.
Broadcast TV Rankings from Neilsen Wire August 24-30
RANK NAME BET DAY VIEWERS (P2+)
1 AMERICA’S GOT TALENT-TUE NBC TUESDAY 11,463,000
2 AMERICA GOT TALENT-WED 9P NBC WED 11,193,000
3 NBC NFL PRE-SEASON 8/30(S) NBC SUNDAY 10,381,000
4 NCIS CBS TUESDAY 10,064,000
5 60 MINUTES CBS SUNDAY 9,712,000
6 TWO AND A HALF MEN CBS MONDAY 9,552,000
7 BIG BANG THEORY, THE CBS MONDAY 8,562,000
8 CSI CBS THURSDAY 8,404,000
9 MENTALIST, THE CBS THURSDAY 8,073,000
10 BIG BROTHER 11-THU CBS THURSDAY 7,792,000
SO thats 9,552,000 people potentially awake to 9/11 Truth.
Fool.
diedaily Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 9:26 am
He he, that happenned to me too. I was responding to some completely stupid and inappropriate comment and lo, the moderators must have done their job with lightning speed. Good for them.
September 8th, 2009 at 8:54 am
Fantastic. Now we know the level of corruption – truly know. Charlie is the man! Can’t do anything about this one trolls! The article speaks for itself.
September 8th, 2009 at 8:54 am
awesome way to make him hear us…way to take back some power charlie….the people of the world thanks you
ps. all you feds on this site, GET OFF!! I would use another word but I have kids!
Porf Reply:
September 13th, 2009 at 5:43 pm
Man are you people dyslexic? This interview never actually took place.
September 8th, 2009 at 8:55 am
valid point.. the same thought crossed my mind..
September 8th, 2009 at 8:55 am
gotta hate when PBO says, “we need to move on.” when he doubled (quadrupled?) troop levels in afghanistan.. ugh!
September 8th, 2009 at 8:57 am
Thanks Charlie!!
I do hope you have audio.
It will be chilling to hear how condescending the President sounds…
His lazy “move forward” rhetoric is extremely disturbing. As Charlie put it: it shapes the thinking of all those under the sway of the Neo-Con media (NYTimes included)
Wouldn’t it be great if President Obama took this opportunity to go underground in Mt. Weather or wherever and went all Constitutional and Justicey on the real life war criminals that brought us Al Qaeda, invasions, torture, and overturned Corporate Personhood. We’d actually love him and sing his praises.. he’s probably even be reelected legitimately, as would his daughters’ daughters.
Instead, he will play dumb to save his good standing with his CFR commanders, the Queen, and the Erik Prince/Dick Cheney/G. Gordon Liddy types… oh and the ability to use all the spying, terrorism, Blackwater, renditions, FBI setups, to improve his flagging ratings…
- – - – -
Mr. President:
You must be feeling tough after killing all those people in Afganistan, eh?
You have the nerve to condescend and tell Charlie to read the 9.11 commission report he just told you was called a sham by the commisioners themselves who said it was “set up to fail”. What an arrogant and failed NLP mindtrick.
Please go into a secure location and read the information you received from Charlie and then read the polls: They will show you that we know about the 9/11… and, like the commissioners, that the 9.11 commission
Look at the science, not Popular Science.
Do the right thing, as Charlie implored… only THEN can we possibly trust that you are “keeping us safe”.
I’m sorry to have you learn, at this late date, that the real threats we face come from within the web of the very Govt. you inherited. Ask Mr.s Sibel Edmonds why don’t you? I’d have you ask John Lennon, MLK, Pat Tillman, 58,000 dead soldiers in Vietnam, but oops they’re no longer with us because of their sick corrupt actors in the system. Maybe listen to Eisenhower on the topic. Our loss of JFK was indeed “unwarranted influence”.
More likely: You’re going to stage some fresh false flag, aren’t you… maybe push a toxic vaccine on the Proles who still trust you…
Porf Reply:
September 13th, 2009 at 5:44 pm
Audio of a fake interview? Who will be playing Obama..being that THIS NEVER ACTUALLY HAPPENED!
September 8th, 2009 at 8:57 am
Excellent work, Mr. Sheen. It is good to see a person with clout step up to the plate and speak truth to power.
Don’t forget the Port Authority Transcripts that describe the basement level explosion and destruction….that can be read at the website, http://dotheordersstillstand.blogspot.com/
September 8th, 2009 at 8:57 am
one morning Barack Obama will wake up and his life will be different.
one morning Bush will wake up and his life will be different.
one morning Cheney will wake up and his life will be different.
one morning WE will wake up and OUR life will be different.
September 8th, 2009 at 8:57 am
CHARLIE SHEEN IS THE MAN.
September 8th, 2009 at 8:58 am
Vote for this story on Reddit!
http://www.reddit.com/r/politi.....hings_get/
September 8th, 2009 at 8:58 am
This was truly amazing. No doubt this was sheen talking to satan the devil using obama as a mouthpiece. obama just seethes with wicked energy. Regardless of the outcome sheen put it right in his face that the american people know about false flags. So dont try another one you scumbag bankers! bravo sheen! im gonna watch red dawn again charlie is just amazing. if only other actors had a backbone like him. charlie, willie nelson and ventura and many others there will be books written about your valiant deeds in these dark times. every actor and singer needs to come forward. cuz this world is entertainment driven. if we bust that reality WE WIN.
LONG LIVE THE REPUBLIC
September 8th, 2009 at 8:59 am
Charlie Sheen is the real deal!
Your name will be written in gold in future historybooks.
September 8th, 2009 at 8:59 am
This has nothing to do with his credibility Mr. Bwaha. He merely was able to use his fame to get a meeting with the president to present facts and ask Obama what he intended to do about it.
September 8th, 2009 at 9:00 am
I too am very impressed with this interview, and Mr. Sheen’s courage in speaking to the President so bluntly on these issues. I also commend him on how well prepared he was for the meeting.
I truly hope that information from AE9/11 Truth information was included in those files, as well as the recent published information regarding the un-ignited Thermite that was found in the dust from the WTC complex.
Good Job Charlie. – This “could” be the electric shot to the heart that gets the entire country animated about these things. I pray that you to will fair well and weather the coming media storm that is no doubt going to develop around you.
pro freedom Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 9:04 am
I hope he threw in a copy of THE OBAMA DECEPTION. lol
Porf Reply:
September 13th, 2009 at 5:46 pm
Speak bluntly to a mannequin? An Obama cutout? This interview never took place genius.
September 8th, 2009 at 9:00 am
Where is the video and the press? You see them every where the president goes, where are they now?
Also, why is it when I search Charlie Sheen and Barack Obama I get inconsisting dates with other websites. I am so confused…
Search through google and you’ll see different websites posting different dates.
September 8th, 2009 at 9:01 am
When Barry Sotero said “I am on the right side of history” He’s right, someone has to play the part of the evil dictator.
September 8th, 2009 at 9:01 am
Alex Jones,
I don’t know whether to laugh or cry.
A REAL American FINALLY confronted President Obama, told him exactly WHY he was full of empty promises and WORSE THAN BUSH, and Barack didn’t have a DAMN thing to say about it. Not even a denial.
Porf Reply:
September 13th, 2009 at 5:48 pm
LOL confronted Obama? How do you confront someone on a FAKE INTERVIEW?
September 8th, 2009 at 9:01 am
I’d really like to see the video, or listen to the audio of this conversation.
If everything went exactly as the transcript says, than Charlie Sheen laid Obama’s ass out flat with the facts. Obama’s responses were as arrogant as ever though. What a joke.
SurvivingPatriot Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 9:10 am
There must be audio for such a good transcript to be reported.
Porf Reply:
September 13th, 2009 at 5:48 pm
This didn’t really happen, you know that right?
Porf Reply:
September 13th, 2009 at 5:48 pm
This didn’t really happen.
September 8th, 2009 at 9:02 am
Great job Charlie!
September 8th, 2009 at 9:03 am
Don’t be too harsh on Obama, at least he agreed to listen for 20 minutes. That has to count for something?
Porf Reply:
September 13th, 2009 at 5:49 pm
He listened for 0 minutes since this interview never really happened!
September 8th, 2009 at 9:03 am
1000 thanks goes out the Charlie and Infowars for this!
E X C E L L E N T
_Don
September 8th, 2009 at 9:04 am
I don’t know how Charlie Sheen can even walk with balls that large. Keep pounding on the wall, the cracks are showing and the rats inside are getting way nervous. Unfortunately that probably means they’re about to hit us with another falseflag. Tomorrow is 9-9-09. I’m not feeling really comfortable about that.
One last thought…..how much you want to bet this interview never sees the light of day on the MSM.
diedaily Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 9:30 am
Oh, you might be surprised.
Porf Reply:
September 13th, 2009 at 5:50 pm
I’d be surprised too if a video of a FAKE INTERVIEW were to emerge.
Porf Reply:
September 13th, 2009 at 5:49 pm
It’ll never see the light of day because the INTERVIEW NEVER REALLY TOOK PLACE!
September 8th, 2009 at 9:04 am
Especially you.
September 8th, 2009 at 9:05 am
I think you can believe Alex Jones when he says this is vital information
September 8th, 2009 at 9:06 am
Hmmm. Interesting take. I like the cut of your paranioa, and will bare it in mind. Thanks
September 8th, 2009 at 9:06 am
If this is real Mr. Sheen did an awesome job. Perfect outline of events. I could not have done it.
Porf Reply:
September 13th, 2009 at 5:51 pm
It’s not real, your dreams have been squashed.
September 8th, 2009 at 9:06 am
We all need to copy this action with out local representatives in Government. Don’t let it end here. Deliver these documents. Hopefully Charlie will provide a link to what exactly he gave the President. I know We Are Change LA posted links to what they have been delivering to politicians.
We can’t just wait for Charlie or some other celebrity to do the work. We must be the media and spread this and the information around. Peace.
September 8th, 2009 at 9:07 am
OK DUDE -> SHOW ME YOUR PROOF !!! WE HAVE PROOF THAT 911 WAS AN INSIDE JOB:
!!!!! WHERE IS YOURS !!!!!
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Porf Reply:
September 13th, 2009 at 5:51 pm
Proof? LMAO, yeah, OK
September 8th, 2009 at 9:07 am
maybe the big announcement is sheen will be running for president in 2012
diedaily Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 9:31 am
He would get my vote.
September 8th, 2009 at 9:08 am
I think you can believe Alex Jones when he says this is vital information.
September 8th, 2009 at 9:08 am
If only I could read Bob Chapmans mind. All would be revealed!
September 8th, 2009 at 9:10 am
Charlie forgot one MASSIVE piece of evidence that just utterly shocks me that he didn’t bring up! Harrit-Jones paper that the nano-engineered EXPLOSIVE thermite was found in the rubble!!!
September 8th, 2009 at 9:10 am
If this is for real we have to expose it to mainstrem media, it’s the only way to get the general populus on board….We know that the truth is not the official story now its time the rest of the world did too…god let this be real
September 8th, 2009 at 9:10 am
who’s the big guest then ? i presume it’s sheen ? …. it can’t be Obama, can it ? :- o lol, no way.
September 8th, 2009 at 9:10 am
It is HUGE news this, you dimwit.
September 8th, 2009 at 9:11 am
Can you emagine for a moment Abe Lincoln or Thomas Jefferson being approached by Charlie Sheen with evidence on the greatest crime of this nation’s history? Can you emagine President Jefferson saying, “You only have 20 minutes,” while his “handlers” stand at the doorway holding a stopwatch? Charlie only gets 20 minutes, but Obama can play golf for hours, or vacation at Cape Cod for days, or go out on the town, or travel, or talk about staying in school to school children. Yet, he cannot give Charlie Sheen more than 20 minutes of his time on a matter that demands as much time as it takes to lay the facts out on the table and dissect it. That’s what Jefferson would have done.
diedaily Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 9:32 am
Damned straight.
September 8th, 2009 at 9:11 am
Try again troll, it’s for real. Incredible and real.
September 8th, 2009 at 9:11 am
I have proof that 9/11 was an inside job just by living on this earth and being able to remember and experience the laws of physics everyday.
Porf Reply:
September 13th, 2009 at 5:53 pm
Laws of Physics? LOL I’ll take the word of my Physics Professor any day over some no name internet wackjob like you.
September 8th, 2009 at 9:12 am
as an aside: KUDOS to Sheen for exposing the error of his-vote, (NOT LIKELY TO SEE KUTCHER or MOORE RISE TO TRUTH).
Go Sheen, your hollywood’s last-hope mi amigo.
September 8th, 2009 at 9:12 am
Way to go Charlie good good work! MEGA IMPRESSED!
September 8th, 2009 at 9:13 am
I can’t discount what you’ve said 40 times. I really hope the audio or video will be available at 11:00
September 8th, 2009 at 9:13 am
I have proof that 9/11 was an inside job just by livin on this earth and being able to experience the laws of physics everyday.
September 8th, 2009 at 9:14 am
Those facts will fit nicely down the memory hole.
September 8th, 2009 at 9:15 am
Unless of copurse your ‘logic’ is flawed, (which it is).
Worry less about Sheen’s career, that’s his-job joker.
September 8th, 2009 at 9:15 am
its pretty obvious that bush/obama knows what happen . how can any official be trusted that acts so indifferent to evidence and truth. hes in on it. just like most of our govt. officials
September 8th, 2009 at 9:15 am
Good Job Charlie!
Our generation speaks out…Finally!
September 8th, 2009 at 9:16 am
I have proof that 9/11 was an inside job just by living here on earth and being able to experience the laws of physics everyday.
September 8th, 2009 at 9:17 am
Wow! Mr. Sheen, very impressive. Calm, collected and focused. Sheen is certainly on the right side of history!
Obama is certainly the maximum puppet but maybe Sheen’s last words sunk into Obama’s head. O is an egomaniac, enough so that he might want to be remembered for doing something for the people rather than bringing down the republic…heh I can “hope” so
September 8th, 2009 at 9:17 am
The “voters” do not elect presidents – they are selected by the real people in charge. Don’t you get it?
September 8th, 2009 at 9:18 am
This day belongs to US!! We’re seriously kicking some NWO tail here people, we’ve got a real chance now to tear down this house of cards – the life of liberty shall be ours once again!!!
September 8th, 2009 at 9:19 am
I am speechless..
WOW way to go Charlie ..Great JOB
September 8th, 2009 at 9:19 am
Wait, was this line at the end of this article when it was first put up?
“Author’s Note: What you have just read didn’t actually happen… yet.”
What the hell?
September 8th, 2009 at 9:19 am
Where is the tape. I bet there isnt a tape or it somehow got “distorted”
September 8th, 2009 at 9:20 am
Well done Charlie Sheen.
No doubt about it now, we WILL now know which side of traitors gate Mr Obama chooses to stand.
If he has nothing to hide he won`t cover for any past wrongdoings by any govt official.
So the choice is crystal clear – Show us the new investigation or join an illustrious group of liars.
September 8th, 2009 at 9:20 am
This interview is a great summary in as few words as possible 8 years of research into the events surrounding September 11, 2001.
There is a difference between moving forward after intensive acknowledgments of the truth, and just moving forward as if in ignorance. And if that ignorance is assumed to be bliss, then only a fool would want to be wise. In the real world when nothing is acknowledged and nothing is maintained other than subterfuge, then our mistakes perpetuate. We are daily in the midst of a government that repeatedly refuses to learn from history, hence in a comedy of errors nonetheless tragic. It is a mistake to acknowledge these events of September 11, 2001 and the to point by point act upon the cited details of it, then to keep on going like nothing happened. If we keep all this security in the presence of false data, then it is security for security’s sake, and it does nothing for the people other than support an increasing inconvenience to everyone.
If all we get from knowing the pretexts evolving out of September 11, 2001 is more of the same, then we have lost freedoms not only for nothing in return, but also at great expense. Every dollar spent upon so called security, and upon warfare is as another said “Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed” — Dwight D. Eisenhower
The theft of sense of well being in a free country is far more important than we at first expected. Chasing of ghosts never existing outside government think tanks, profits only a few and how cheaply bought is this easy path to riches for fewer and fewer people. In the end we are creating a world whose sole ownership is buried in its own pyramid, and where no one really owns or controls anything. Such is a world of theft.
September 8th, 2009 at 9:21 am
WOW !!! WOW !!!! WOW !!!! WOW !!!!!……….CHARLIE SHEEN, THANK YOU !!!! YOU TOLD THAT BARRY SOETORO EVERYTHING I WOULD WANT TO SAY TO HIM, AND YOU DID IT WAY MORE CALMLY THEN I WOULD……….AMAZING !!!!! YOU HAVE BIG ONES…..HUGE…..THANK YOU ALEX AND THANK YOU CHARLIE…..YOU TWO GUYS ARE BEYOND PATRIOTIC !!!! GOD BLESS YOU AND PROTECT YOU AND YOUR FAMILIES !!!!
September 8th, 2009 at 9:21 am
Charlie went toe to toe with the President where most people would have crumbled under the inherent intimitdation factor alone. The transcript of the interview would make a really good script for a scene in a feature length movie. If I was writing the movie script, the next part would involve the presendent forming a secret investigative team to get to the bottom of it and bring the real perps to justice.
September 8th, 2009 at 9:23 am
OMG, Charlie Sheen has become a legend right now. And some said he walked away from 9/11 truth.
He can die any moment with a smiling face and he can say he told the truth to the US-president. And everything is well documented for his fellow americans and offspring. The Sheens are a great familly.
September 8th, 2009 at 9:24 am
I think we’d all like to think that we’d have the balls to take it to the President
but in reality we don’t
Charlie has some big balls
well done to him!
September 8th, 2009 at 9:24 am
Hahahahaha! Brilliant! But you are so right.
September 8th, 2009 at 9:25 am
Hey, everyone, at the end of the article:
Author’s Note: What you have just read didn’t actually happen… yet.
September 8th, 2009 at 9:25 am
people like this—that operate on inner integrity
always shine through
the 911coverup is falling like a house of cards
charlie stuck to his guns—-waited for the right moment to do his particular part
executed flawlessly
September 8th, 2009 at 9:25 am
OK… well don’t I feel silly now for saying good job a minute ago. That’s what we all get for not getting all our facts straight. This appears at the bottom of the article under Charlie’s signature…
Author’s Note: What you have just read didn’t actually happen… yet.
This is an open letter to the President requesting a new investigation.
Charlie Sheen.
- Well, I hope that the conversation with teh President does happen… but will wait to make sure I’ve read all of the asterisks at the bottom of the page next time before I give kudos.
September 8th, 2009 at 9:28 am
please do your part by keeping hope for change alive…hahahahahahahah
September 8th, 2009 at 9:28 am
I’m holding out to hear the show before I soil myself in glee. Whatever the case, this is going to be a massive counterpunch from the Nat-Geo and other hit pieces being cooked up in their death rattle desperation. The real bits of evidence Charlie raises will be covered in the mainstream. More minds to our side. Critical mass is coming.
September 8th, 2009 at 9:29 am
Your ignorance baffles me.
September 8th, 2009 at 9:29 am
Like Obama did not allready know of all of this.It is not like he is not briefed the socalled secrets, anyone with some sense knows the official story is bunk.I dont understand what the fuzz is about.How many celebrities does it take to change politics? Do the two even have a relation and if so,.. is not hollywood also under the current corruption? Why would anyone think Obama is going to suddenly turn around? He is just as much part of the global agenda as any other president has been for the last decades or more.Why would that change? I saw a video from Naomi Wolf about ten steps to fascism,it looks alot like what is happening here in my country, just as it is in America.
September 8th, 2009 at 9:30 am
absolutely fascinating…
wonderful job charlie!
Rather immodest of the president to judge himself as on the right side of history, already – shouldn’t that be our job once he’s done?
LKROSSS Reply:
September 11th, 2009 at 11:30 pm
“Author’s (C.S.) Note: What you have just read didn’t actually happen… yet.”
You´ll find this sentence at the end of the “interview”.
September 8th, 2009 at 9:30 am
Maybe they used this
http://diganet.net/htm_docs/digapenn.htm
to get the video..that would rock
September 8th, 2009 at 9:31 am
Fantastic job, Charlie!
Unfortunately it was quite clear that Obama resisted everything you said – despite all of the evidence you presented.
On the bright side, you have supplied us with a great link to send to those who can’t see the truth, to help them open their eyes.
Thank you for so boldy standing up for “We the people.” You are a brave Patriot!
September 8th, 2009 at 9:31 am
If nothing else this will at least clean up the replys here. i mean who would respond like a child at a time like this.
September 8th, 2009 at 9:32 am
WOW.. he REALLY did a good job. I sure hope this makes a difference for you in the US. It used to be a great country but nowadays… I won’t spend my holydays overthere anymore.
September 8th, 2009 at 9:32 am
excellent job charlie! glad to see some real questions asked of these criminals. next step is to arrest all these traitors for treason and take this country back.
September 8th, 2009 at 9:36 am
I rarely read the comments on Infowars because they usually digress to subjects unrelated to the original story. However, I am heartened to see the positive response to this posting. The government shills are standing out here like unburned passports at Ground Zero. Were the subject not so grave, their comments would be quite humorous.
To belittle this interview and the courage it took to both request it and carry it out, one must have no concept of the real world and what it would take to get an audience with the president of the U.S., no matter who he or she might be, or be receiving payment to try and do so.
The gravity of directly questioning the president about inconsistencies in the official story of the most influential event in any of our lifetimes is overwhelming. And, when this interview is included in “Fall of the Republic” and spread around the world on YouTube, it might break the whole 9/11 lie wide open.
Thanks Charlie.
LKROSSS Reply:
September 11th, 2009 at 11:31 pm
“Author’s (C.S.) Note: What you have just read didn’t actually happen… yet.”
You´ll find this sentence at the end of the “interview”.
September 8th, 2009 at 9:36 am
Great job Charlie. You’ve won my respect.
September 8th, 2009 at 9:36 am
If this does not convince obama to do something nothing will!great job charlie!
September 8th, 2009 at 9:36 am
the truth the way the life bring forth the proposition
September 8th, 2009 at 9:37 am
Great Job Charlie!
A few notable responses you should remember by President Obama:
“..peaceful transfer of power.” Odd silence… was there anticipation for a violent transfer of power?
After “call ME crazy…”
“..we must endure through these dangerous and politically challenging years ahead.” Foretelling the future?
The talkaround for PNAC and Cheney’s involvement, don’t forget Rumsfeld and Wolfowitz, oh and Dan Quayle.
“I would call this a blatant case of misjudgment fueled by an unfortunate milieu of assumption. For some, the uninformed denial of coincidence.”
Charlie said, interesting angle… I would have said…. huh? In 1999, people came together and said they needed another Pearl Harbor, they achieved power and 9/11 happened. Who is uninformed?
Just remember folks…
“..what you and the families must understand and accept is that we are doing everything we can to protect you.”
What we must UNDERSTAND and ACCEPT…. is the Federal Government is not my mommy and daddy, and we do NOT have to listen to your directives. If it does not seem right, we have the RIGHT to question.
Remember it is not longer a RIGHT if you have to ask permission.
Grow Up people.. start thinking for yourselves. Ask Questions, Seek Answers!
“The ultimate measure of a man is not where he stands in moments of comfort and convenience, but where he stands at times of challenge and controversy.” – MLK, Jr
September 8th, 2009 at 9:40 am
The same people who caused 9/11 are the same EVIL SCUM who put this moron puppet in office talking to him behind closed doors WTF is that going to do??? Nothing!!!
September 8th, 2009 at 10:18 am
LOOK LOOK LOOK
Look at the very end of this article, it says:
Author’s Note: What you have just read didn’t actually happen… yet
September 8th, 2009 at 10:24 am
great interview, lets see what comes of it.
September 8th, 2009 at 10:24 am
Seemingly great stuff, but whistling in the wind in the end. Does anybody really believe Obama can do anything without his banker masters giving him the go ahead?
I wish it also weren’t undermined by Sheen’s admission that he voted for him.
September 8th, 2009 at 10:26 am
May the Good Lord bless and protect the brave Mr. Sheen.
We’ll have those worms soon, cos’ Charlies the can opener.
Peace and Love.
September 8th, 2009 at 10:54 am
Yay Charlie! Let’s do this!
September 8th, 2009 at 10:55 am
the end part:
“Author’s Note: What you have just read didn’t actually happen… yet. “
is confusing many people
MN Patriot Reply:
September 8th, 2009 at 11:01 am
I tried to say the same thing, but it wasn’t posted. Go fig…
September 8th, 2009 at 10:57 am
“ANYONE ELSE”…. WAS THE CONVERSATION…. RECORDED? I MEAN IF IT IS WRITTEN OUT IN A TOTAL TRANSCRIPT… “HOW ELSE COULD THIS BE WHAT WAS SAID?” I AM NOT TRYING TO DOWN MR SHEEN, BUT FOLKS.. DAMN IT… THIS ISN’T A GRADE SCHOOL PLAYGROUND! I’M A OPEN MINDED “FREE” THINKING AMERICAN! A LIFE TIME RESIDENT OF “THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA”, NO “LEGAL” CHANGE HAS BEEN MADE, THE NORTH AMERICAN “BULLSH!T” IS A SHAM! IT IS TOTALLY ILLEGAL, CONGRESS… LONG TIME BOUGHT AND SOLD, “WE’VE BEEN ABANDONED FOLKS, IT SUCKS TOO… BUT “I DO NOT SEE “ANYONE” URGING A SYSTEMATIC “RE-STRUCTURING” OF OUR NATION! SO ANY OF YOU HAVE A CIVIL RESPONSE? I MEAN “HEY, WE WE’RE ALL SUPPOSED TO BE” ADULTS, YES?
September 8th, 2009 at 10:58 am
Ya’ll sound like ignoramouses. Read the bottom of the article. All of these comments suggesting this was a REAL interview should be scrubbed! AJ listeners are not that stupid… I hope!
September 8th, 2009 at 11:04 am
Wait a minute. All that hype for an imaginary interview with Obama? About 9-11? About Sheen going on the Alex Jones show presenting evidence WE ALREADY KNOW?
I’m a believer but I DON”T like being sucked into a “News at 11″ teaser.
Still, Charlie’s a good man, but he lacks the credibility and clout. If guys like LUCAS and SPIELBERG had ANY balls at ALL, they’d use THEIR collective fame to wake up the zombies that populate most of the planet.
Hell, know what? When the concentration camps start to fill up and the willing occupants wake up from their slumber, I’ll be sitting in my bunker chuckling away. Locked and loaded of course.
That’s MY fantasy, I’m allowed.
September 8th, 2009 at 11:04 am
**** Not an actual interview****
READ THE BOTTOM, THIS IS AN OPEN LETTER – I suggest putting this on top of the page to avoid confusion
****Not an actual interview******
Good work, Charlie!
Let’s see how the media spins this one…
September 8th, 2009 at 11:06 am
So let me get this straight, this actually hasn’t happened yet? He just wrote this as a pretext to actually get a real interview with the President? Well, it was good regardless and I hope he gets a chance to talk.
September 8th, 2009 at 11:06 am
Way to go CHARLIE !!!!
Charles for President and Alex for VP.
Nahh, remember what happened to Ross Perot?
September 8th, 2009 at 11:08 am
Your websites are COMPLETELY overloaded!
Timing out all over the world:
http://remotestatus.com/quickt.....amp;r=6975
September 8th, 2009 at 11:10 am
Let’s be clear on something. There are some Glen Beck/Neocon “patriots” who listen to Alex Jones. Here is what I’d tell you these folks: 9/11 is the most important issue in the Patriot movement because everything our government does is based upon the events of 9/11. The police state would not be possible if it weren’t for the events of 9/11. Of course the Patriot wouldn’t exist if it weren’t for 9/11. Read what judge Judge Napolitano says about the Patriot Act, “The Patriot Act is the most dastardly assault on human liberty and on guaranteed rights in the Constitution that the congress ever enacted…”. Obama has imperial-like powers because of the false flag event of 9/11 and the Patriot Act. When you complain about Obama’s tyrannical system please thank the previous administration, the Patriot Act, and the false flag events of 9/11 for setting much of it up.
September 8th, 2009 at 11:20 am
I totally agree with post #185.. couldn’t have read my mind any better
**** Not an actual interview****
READ THE BOTTOM, THIS IS AN OPEN LETTER – I suggest putting this on top of the page to avoid confusion
****Not an actual interview******
Good work, Charlie!
Lets see how the media spins this one…
September 11th, 2009 at 1:45 pm
*****Not an actual interview*****
did not happen yet
wtf someone please explain what an open letter is
September 11th, 2009 at 1:56 pm
Why is it that Hollywierd actors and actresses think of themselves as experts ON EVERYTHING IN THE ENTIRE UNIVERSE?????
ANSWER: They were brought up by lib parents who said everything is just fine with that feces little Charlie flung on the wall.
My God, the left is dimented. Can you imagine the slime that invents this kind of bilge?
September 11th, 2009 at 1:56 pm
You go, Charlie! You are your father’s son and I thank him for his help in defeating the machinations of BHP Billiton threatening Oxnard.
September 11th, 2009 at 2:03 pm
Happy Birthday Charlie…. Thank you for the present to the sleeping Americans who refuse a check and balance. For the survivors/ victoms, whom we all are. Keep up the vigilance for all of us whose voices tend not to be heard. May you be blessed .
September 11th, 2009 at 2:31 pm
Charlie! You self-aggrandizing fool. If this is a transcript of your taped interview, why did you put a caption under a photo of yourself saying you’re “writing” 20 Minutes? While you were at it, why didn’t you ask BO to produce his real birth certificate? Is what you did any different?
September 11th, 2009 at 3:07 pm
I would actually be outraged by this, however, I only find myself pitying Charlie Sheen’s complete stupidity.
September 11th, 2009 at 3:10 pm
Good for you Charlie Sheen. If more ‘celebrities’ used the platform they have for Truth, Western Culture would be so much more about Healing instead of Destruction and Lies. Peace
September 11th, 2009 at 3:28 pm
Am I the only one who realizes that this didn’t actually happen? At the end of the transcript it says quite clearly:
Author’s Note: What you have just read didn’t actually happen… yet.
This is an open letter to the President requesting a new investigation.
Charlie Sheen.
concerned Reply:
September 11th, 2009 at 3:37 pm
I noted that as well… and posted a lengthy expression of concern. However, my comment mysteriously disapeared within ~10 minutes or so. I was more disturbed before I realized the board was being pruned. I feel much better now.
also concerned Reply:
September 11th, 2009 at 4:14 pm
Alex Jones has just lost a listener and customer.
This sort of hype and misinformation is exactly why I avoid the mainstream media.
I used to think people who called Alex Jones a “double agent” were insane. I’m not so sure anymore. Alex has either lost his mind, or his integrity. Not sure which.
Delete this comment if you must. I just hope you read it first.
September 11th, 2009 at 3:32 pm
July 15th 2001, I turned 50, and decided to take early retirement from a job that demanded peak health and fitness, I was neither healthy or fit, my greatest concern was the impending catastrophe scheduled for September in New York, At that time, I did not have an exact date. I knew that about 3,500 New Yorkers would meet their fate, and had made elaborate preparations. A Presentation Copy (Leather Bound Edition) of Whitaker’s Obituary containing the names of about 3,500 prominent people who had died in the year 2000. including one resident of New York, who was the source of our intelligence. I only learnt of his identity, when the ‘unopened’ package from the publisher arrived, and my local Librarians were preparing a dedication from The Head of Her Majesty’s Household Scotland to be glued into the fronticepiece. Our source (R.I.P.) was the natural page this book opened at. That page had been photocopied before posting. This book is available for inspection at the main Library in Preston.
As for 9/11 my ADC was lazy, I had asked him to buy a dozen VHS cassettes so as to video-tape all the day’s NOOZ (NOT NEWS) out of New York. Allan my ADC offered to over-tape some of his redundant cassettes, but was mystified at all the fuss and bother, “What’s goint to happen in New York Alastair?” he said, “I don’t know Allan, but something pretty big, it has to be, and I fear a lot of deaths!”….R.I.P. VERY SAD!
September 11th, 2009 at 3:33 pm
my comment was just removed. Enjoy your self-indulgence.
September 11th, 2009 at 3:49 pm
Brovo, Charlie: You and Richard Gage are my top heroes right now. Amazing, brave. Love ya.
September 11th, 2009 at 3:53 pm
This is the reason that our country fails to operate correctly. People publish documents under the pretense that they are real, only in the fine print do they specify that none of the interview actually took place. Yet, in the coming days I’m sure I will hear all about this, people spouting off facts and questions from a non-existent interview because some media jack-ass duped them into believing that this is real.
September 11th, 2009 at 4:03 pm
Number 7: “WTC Building 7. Watch the video of its collapse.”
What sort of irrefutable fact is this? Why do so many people feel like they have an intuition into how a heavily damaged and burning building should fall? The general public has no understanding of such fantastic events. This kind of energy release is beyond the common experience.
Eric S. Reply:
September 14th, 2009 at 12:15 am
Building 7 wasn’t heavily damaged. Unless by heavily you mean small debris and a few small office fires. Remember building 7 wasn’t hit by a plane. A building doesn’t fall at free-fall speed and onto its own footprint unless it is a controlled demolition. You may as well change your name to koolaid guy.
science guy Reply:
September 14th, 2009 at 11:48 am
Eric – This is what I don’t get… people question the validity of reports when it hinders their hypothesis and then bank on them when it supports it. “Building 7 wasn’t heavily damaged” is part of a report that was followed up with further findings that it was. “A few small office fires” is something that is difficult to quantify as there were no firefighters in there trying to put the blaze out. Reports indicate that diesel fuel was stored to fuel generators. As for the free-fall assertion, just because a building falls in such a way during demolition, the same kind of collapse is not made exclusive to demolition. I’m not an expert in the ways of demolition, but I’m also pretty sure nobody knows exactly how this structure was impacted by the collapse of the other buildings and which fires affected which parts of its structure. Consider the alternative claim and it’s probability. In the midst of this chaos, someone pulls off a controlled demolition 7 hours after the first 2 WTC’s fell and while fires are burning uncontrolled throughout the building. This is just one example of cherry picking the evidence in favor of one’s hypothesis. When considered as a whole and objectively, there is very little chance that building 7 was brought down by a controlled demolition.
Okita Reply:
September 14th, 2009 at 12:18 am
“heavily damaged and burning building..”
I think you’re exaggerating a little bit. You’re acting like a plane hit wtc7 which is not true, and it is also unfair to say the entire building was on fire. There were a few floors with fires but most of the building was fine. How can a fire in an upper floor cause the rest of the building to uniformly fall in the manner of a controlled demolition?
science guy Reply:
September 14th, 2009 at 12:02 pm
Okita – I’m not trying to misrepresent the findings. I’m not “acting like” or being “unfair” about anything. This building came down and that is an undisputed fact. After that, there are lots and lots of variables to consider in evaluating how it came down. What you are suggesting is that initial reports of low damage and small fires prove that a controlled demolition of this building was the cause. The same logic could be used by me to say that no reports of a demolition crew preparing the building for demolition in the months prior, and no post-collapse demolition litter evidence, prove that it was due to damage and fire. Later findings illustrate that the building was damaged heavily from below and that the unique design of the building provided for the conditions needed to collapse the building with the damage and uncontrolled fires. It sounds more exciting the other way, I’ll grant you that.. but the evidence just isn’t there IMO.
September 11th, 2009 at 4:18 pm
The people who comment on this without reading the part that says that the interview NEVER ACTUALLY HAPPENED are the same people that allow this stuff to happen in the first place. Start read. Do research. Don’t believe everything you hear. I know how hard that is because most people can be made to believe anything. Criss Angel still being on the air and the belief that Jesus came back to life are case in point.
Meg Reply:
September 11th, 2009 at 6:14 pm
THANK YOU. My god, people want to talk about puppets a lot, don’t they? lol
science guy Reply:
September 14th, 2009 at 12:14 pm
Agree wikimeda… I was a bit disturbed to see all of these responses that seemed completely lost on the fact that this was a fictional interview. Then I realized some of my comments were being erased and that made me feel much more at ease.. this forum is an example of how public opinion can be misrepresented through control of a medium like this website. I’m assuming all of this 911 conspiracy talk makes some folks a healthy income. Public attention is the new hot commodity and infowars is likely profiting nicely from generating it.
September 11th, 2009 at 4:26 pm
I was previously employed as a designer for Boeing and have seen how truly empty a 757 is. The fuselage and wings are made primarily of aluminum (soda can material). All is designed with weight reduction in mind. Panels are chemically milled to reduce thickness where it isn’t needed for strength. Parts are painstakingly designed in every conceivable manner to remove all unnecessary weight. Engines are not like your car engines… They have a solid steel shaft down the middle but are mostly fragile tubes and very thin compressor blades (think stack of small windmills). Slamming all of this into a fortified building at near mach speeds with large quantities of fuel to burn is beyond the common person’s ability to mentally simulate. There is no “common sense” to consult when addressing this question. The event consists of energies and material interactions that are beyond the common experience.
September 11th, 2009 at 4:55 pm
good think i was stoned reading this..
September 11th, 2009 at 5:02 pm
I cannot take your website seriously until I see an “about us” on your menu that gives full disclosure of who is responsible for selection and promotion of the articles, full set of credentials, mission policy statement of your intent with the website, and an agreement that you believe more than two witnesses are needed for an important story like this one.
September 11th, 2009 at 5:33 pm
While Jones was hyping the Charlie Sheen non-story, you may have missed the REALLY BIG NEWS:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/4.....836395100/
September 11th, 2009 at 5:54 pm
NOW I HOPE THAT YOU DUMBASSES REALIZE THAT THIS WAS A FARCE, A YARN
THE INTERVIEW NEVER REALLY HAPPENED!!
STUPID F***S
September 11th, 2009 at 5:54 pm
Good job Charlie, i also think the VS created 9/11.
The VS government is very dirty for years, the f---ed up the financial system (you guys are bankrupt!!!!!!), they created 9/11 and i think they created the Mexican flu.
It is a big mess, Goldman Sachs controls Wallstreet, i think we can say “Goldman Sachs=Wallstreet.
Every day i must laught when i hear some American speakers saying that everything will be better.. BULLs---, your government talks crap.
20% is jobless instead of 9.7% as you were told, your creditcard is full, your house is worthless.
PEOPLE OF THE VS WAKE UP, FIGHT FOR YOUR RIGHTS BECAUSE THIS GOVERNMENT WILL TAKE EVERYTHING FROM YOU, YOUR LIFE, YOUR JOB, YOUR MONEY.
Regards,
Jac
The Netherlands
September 11th, 2009 at 6:10 pm
I would just like to say that even though I live in the U.K. I still thought of those who were lost on 9/11, and my thoughts still go to their families.
Charlie Sheen; i think is doing the right thing and i hope support continues to rally too him, not just in the states but from around the world.
U have my support Mr Sheen i hope u find the truth for all of us!
September 11th, 2009 at 6:12 pm
Author’s Note: What you have just read didn’t actually happen… yet.
September 11th, 2009 at 6:12 pm
If you’re going to read something and get up on your high horse about all your ideals and how stupid the other person is, you might want to read the entire piece.
does anyone else know that this interview NEVER HAPPENED?
It’s a fact. Read right under the signature. OMG people.
September 11th, 2009 at 6:17 pm
Unfortunately, your credibility just went from high to almost zero. By not posting at the top that this was not a real interview which took place proves you are trying to sway one’s opinion. Congratulations, now many more people will not take you seriously. Be honest with people and post the disclaimer at the top. Signed, everyone who might decide to come back to your site.
LKROSSS Reply:
September 11th, 2009 at 11:35 pm
“Author’s Note: What you have just read didn’t actually happen… yet.”
You´ll find this sentence at the end of the “interview”.
September 11th, 2009 at 6:34 pm
Charlie Sheen for President!! It’s too bad we can’t get a President whose balls are as big as Charlie’s… way to go Charlie, I’m very impressed!!
September 11th, 2009 at 6:41 pm
He clearly states in his interview with Alex Jones that the interview didn’t actually take place, he’s just wanting to create a public document, and that is exactly what he did. One thing he has done is educated a lot more citizens of the U.S. on what has been going on in this country, even before 9/11.
September 11th, 2009 at 7:07 pm
I think you need to put that this interview didn’t actually happen in bold capitals ; ). Just sayin’
Seems like an awful lot of people missed that part of the message – would be cool if it did and with that vision held in your mind that clearly it might – but you need to let the people here know that this is what you imagine saying to him, not what you have said to him.
September 11th, 2009 at 7:21 pm
Uhhhh this isn’t real,
http://www.examiner.com/x-9341.....rlie-Sheen
But then again those who would believe in a 9/11 conspiracy theory probably don’t care if something is real or not, as long as they believe in it it’s good enough for them.
Abu Reply:
September 15th, 2009 at 11:25 pm
Of course it is a fake letter. John, the interview was not real. And was never claimed to be real either by Alex Jones or Charlie Sheen. It is a hypothetical interview based on 9/11 facts, but the letter was actually written by Charlie Sheen. The idea is to bring media/public attention to the issue of 9/11. There is no conspiracy going on with this letter. It is a hypothetical interview meant to attract attention to a very important subject.
September 11th, 2009 at 7:36 pm
It doesn’t matter if Charlie Sheen has not given us a real interview or not. What he said is totally credible because he enlists 100% REAL proof in the link given below the signature which is IN the interview. What Charlie Sheen wrote is entirely fact and just because the responses by Obama are fictional doesn’t make the FACTS he presented fictional. They are as REAL as Sheen’s compassion for everyone affected by 9/11 and his serious determination to bring the truth the the world about what really happened on September 11,2001.
scared Reply:
September 12th, 2009 at 1:41 am
First of all, Thank you Charlie for getting this information out there to the People. I admire your drive for the truth! We deserve it!
Has anyone seen the concentration camp videos?…I’m sure a lot of you have…. If we don’t comply that’s where we will end up real soon. I have just started looking deeply into this the past couple days and I didn’t know that this is actually out there in the President’s face right now… it has to have been by now… so we are going to see what is going to be done.
I’m scared for my family and loved ones.
Dear Lord,
Please be with the people of the United States of America through this time of chaos. Please instill in the Presidents heart the willingness to do the right thing and be on the Peoples side. AMEN!
The Preamble
“We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity….”
September 11th, 2009 at 8:58 pm
HEY PEOPLE! THIS IS NOT A REAL INTERVIEW.
IT’S MADE UP FOR GOD’S SAKE.
How can you try to defend a conspiracy theory with a made up interview?
Charlie Sheen, 100% discredited.
bang a gong Reply:
September 15th, 2009 at 11:46 am
madeup??no.. staged?no. sheen is on the right track
September 11th, 2009 at 8:58 pm
HEY PEOPLE! THIS IS NOT A REAL INTERVIEW.
IT’S MADE UP FOR GOD’S SAKE.
How can you try to defend a conspiracy theory with a made up interview?
Charlie Sheen, 100% discredited.
Abu Reply:
September 15th, 2009 at 11:30 pm
The problem is with you, not with Sheen. Alex Jones and Charlie Sheen opened stated from the start that it was not a real interview. Please advanced your thinking process. Not real does not mean “lying” or “fraudulent” on the part of Jones or Sheen. It is a hypothetical interview. And actually a very cunning way to attract media attention to these issues. People who only want to shout ‘fake, fake, fake’ are totally oblivious to what is going on here with this hypothetical interview.
September 11th, 2009 at 9:16 pm
What the heck kind of website is this? I got here from a facebook link. Are you people complete and utter morons? Are you looking for aliens and wondering about the Bermuda triangle? Do you check your horoscope every morning? Do you spend the whole afternoon listening to Rush? Do any of you any pay attention to reality? EVER?
Tell me the truth, is this website a hoax?
September 11th, 2009 at 9:21 pm
Oh, my comment was removed, too, which means that the whole world hasn’t gone comletely crazy. They’re just keeping the whacko posts and deleting the others. Thank God, I was hoping it was all a dream.
science guy Reply:
September 14th, 2009 at 12:51 pm
I’m with you Chris – I was a bit freaked out before I realized they were removing select comments from the board. Info Wars indeed lol…
September 11th, 2009 at 10:56 pm
Thank you so much for what you are doing Mr. Sheen. I hope history remembers you as a man who stood up for his people while their leaders denied them truth and justice.
September 11th, 2009 at 11:56 pm
he had a lot balls. We all are starting to find out go to this website to know more
http://www.auditthefed.com/wp-.....-Sheet.pdf
September 12th, 2009 at 1:38 am
No amount of political quasi-activism will justify Charlie Sheen’s cultural output from the last 15 years.
September 12th, 2009 at 1:42 am
First of all, Thank you Charlie for getting this information out there to the People. I admire your drive for the truth! We deserve it!
Has anyone seen the concentration camp videos?…I’m sure a lot of you have…. If we don’t comply that’s where we will end up real soon. I have just started looking deeply into this the past couple days and I didn’t know that this is actually out there in the President’s face right now… it has to have been by now… so we are going to see what is going to be done.
I’m scared for my family and loved ones.
Dear Lord,
Please be with the people of the United States of America through this time of chaos. Please instill in the Presidents heart the willingness to do the right thing and be on the Peoples side. AMEN!
The Preamble
“We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity….”
September 12th, 2009 at 1:43 am
Ever notice how the useful idiots and disinfo agents engage in endless put-downs, but they NEVER EVER give a single shred of proof that the 9/11 attacks were NOT the work of the shadow government with Bush, Cheney & Co. in total compliance? C’mon, John, Chris and the rest of you delusional deniers of Reality: GIVE ME ONE VERIFIABLE AND INCONTROVERTIBLE PIECE OF EVIDENCE THAT SUPPORTS THE OFFICIAL GOVERNMENT STORY.
Thank you, Charlie Sheen … and watch your back….
Porf Reply:
September 13th, 2009 at 5:07 pm
Why should Charlie watch his back? As of what he and all you other Tinfoil Hat Brigaders matter? LOL get over yourselves….seriously.
science guy Reply:
September 14th, 2009 at 12:58 pm
Prove it WASN’T – Have you ever heard of the “teacup” hypothesis? There is this hypothesis that a teacup is existing somewhere in the sun’s orbit, between the great asteroid belt and mars. Lets say that you are a reasonable person and find this to be highly unlikely. I being a teacup believer might be compelled to say “Prove there ISN’T a teacup out there!” Can you see how this sounds? The burden of proof is on you sir.
September 12th, 2009 at 2:54 am
He is right on, except that nobody wants to mention the zionists’ hand in 9/11. Are you guys really not aware that the said “shadow government” refers to the zionist hold on our government, news media, Hollywood and the financial institutions?
Earthian Reply:
September 12th, 2009 at 4:18 am
YOU SEEMS RIGHT PETE SAKE
September 12th, 2009 at 3:38 am
Towards the bottom, guys:
“Author’s Note: What you have just read didn’t actually happen… yet. “
September 12th, 2009 at 3:41 am
Both in on it.
September 12th, 2009 at 4:03 am
This was a scam to sell DVDs.
Alex has no respect for the movement.
jared Reply:
September 12th, 2009 at 8:12 am
He gives his movies away for free. There not asking for any money. They just want answers.
brandon Reply:
September 14th, 2009 at 10:00 am
now look alex jones the best we have he gives his movies for free i bet if you go to youtube look up endgame you will find it he does not copyright his movies now if you were smart you’d know he cant send a copy to everybody you have to have a lot of money and Alex has no respect for the movement well you have to decide that for your self.
September 12th, 2009 at 4:17 am
This is serious… it can’t be ignored… somebody have got to be responsible for all the deception that affect the relationship between American and the muslim world… they deserve to know the TRUTH!
September 12th, 2009 at 5:54 am
f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f---
September 12th, 2009 at 5:55 am
f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f---
f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f---
f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f---
f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f--- f---
jared Reply:
September 12th, 2009 at 8:11 am
your a stroke
headmelter Reply:
September 12th, 2009 at 9:11 am
Your vocabulary seems to be very limited or it would be advisable for you to make an appointment with a suitably qualified medical practitioner to have the severity of your tourets assessed.
jake hancox Reply:
September 13th, 2009 at 8:59 am
If you wrote that individually then i would gladly have you in any debate im a part of.
but you most likely copy and pasted… which is like debating with a christian, just offensive nonsense repeated over and over with little effort or thought …..
September 12th, 2009 at 6:14 am
Please checkout the zeitgeist movement and the two films “Zeitgeist the final version” “Zeitgeist addendum”.
It will make you think…
September 12th, 2009 at 9:10 am
Charlie Sheen is a great actor but personally and politically he is a mess. Obama is the most liberal president in history and when Obama thinks Sheen is out of touch that says a lot. Celebrities need a dose of hard labor reality like the rest of us live in. They create fantasy and they live in a fantasy world surrounded by other unbalanced celebrities.
There is no way this is a conspiracy. The quantity of people that would have to be in on it and paid off (also known as innocent bi-standers) would be astronomical.
You people really need to wake up and start using your brain. When you let the Charlie Sheen’s of the world do your thinking for you, you have much bigger personal problems then clearly you are aware of.
Get it together people!
RM Reply:
September 12th, 2009 at 10:59 am
shut the f--- up
jake hancox Reply:
September 13th, 2009 at 9:24 am
No rm you shut the f--- up… we dont need inarticulates doing our argueing with a completely resonable if somewhat misguided statement
BN:
a)obama has the image of the most liberal, he hasent pulled out of illegal invasions, he hasnt stoped torture, he hasnt got health care……. nothing NOTHING.
he just happens to be a great orator, and your buying it
b) charlie sheen cant be a mess politically…. because hes an actor he can only have his own right to an opinion. and his personal life is just that…. personal
also…. sean penn, charlie sheen….. umm thats not exactly an entire cavalcade of celebritys
c) why the hell would you need to pay off an innocent bystander, they arnt going to know whats going on thats why their an INNOCENT BYSTANDER.
the only people who had to be completely in on it and aware of the total reality is the VP who had norad stand down. and the people who planted the thermite (this IS a total guess but id go with CIA) also watch zeitgeist the movie or actually get informed and youll find that most of the people at ground zero are the ones asking the questions due to their experiances not coralating with the official report…
d) your an idiot please read RMs above comment
September 12th, 2009 at 12:25 pm
Fictitious interview? WTF?
September 12th, 2009 at 1:05 pm
It doesn’t matter if Charlie Sheen has not given us a real interview or not. What he said is totally credible because he enlists 100% REAL proof in the link given below the signature which is IN the interview. What Charlie Sheen wrote is entirely fact and just because the responses by Obama are fictional doesn’t make the FACTS he presented fictional. They are as REAL as Sheen’s compassion for everyone affected by 9/11 and his serious determination to bring the truth the the world about what really happened on September 11,2001.
September 12th, 2009 at 2:04 pm
The Zionists are beginning to look over their shoulder. cs keep em looking.
September 12th, 2009 at 3:16 pm
The only one that knows the truth is X Pres. BUSH & his team.
I have heard many people say this was a set up from day one.
I too personally believe that things were not right.
It just made no sense how a building can crumble from below while
a plane was stuck in the top. Look at all t he footage closely.
But here’s the thing. President Obama is having a hard enough time
trying to repair all the other damage from the past 8 years, give the man
a break! He already has his hands full having to just prove he’s worthy!
September 12th, 2009 at 3:23 pm
This will reinvigorate the frustrated and embattled truthers-this is a real champion at last, articulate, compassionate, determined. Thanks, Charlie and go get ‘em. We are with you. Make more videos, and what about one to the friends of truthers asking them to finally look into what they’ve been hearing about but never investigated themselves? It’s time to get everyone up to speed and you are the one who can do it. Full steam ahead and don’t let up!
September 12th, 2009 at 3:40 pm
9/11 WAS NOT AN INSIDE JOB
I challenge anyone here to debate me on the facts.
Torpex Reply:
September 12th, 2009 at 9:46 pm
I will concede if you can explain where 2 =-3ton engines went at the pentagon.
The basic laws of physics and the design of commercial jet engines is enough proof
that what ever it was that hit the pentagon was not what we are being told. Let alone
the 300 tons of metal that disappeared into the bldg.
Sorry…300 tons doesnt “vaporize” and those engines should have been found
50% intact at least 200ft into the bldg. Their design alone assures their ability to remain intact
The same with the crash site in PA…no engines, and the one they did find someone
claimed it “bounced”..really….3 tons of engine at 400knots bounces when it hit earth??
Wether it was an inside job or not, the coverup was definately an inside job.
jake hancox Reply:
September 13th, 2009 at 9:29 am
challenge accepted, please make an argument of somesort.
this is required in order for me to retort and for the exchange of facts to begin…. hence createing a debate…. i think ive just wasted 30 seconds of my life acknoledging your existance…. f---wit
The Telecrap Urinal Reply:
September 13th, 2009 at 5:35 pm
Debate Me – bring it on. My first challenge is to explain away the ‘Weapons Grade US Military Industrial Complex Made’ nanothermite and nanothermate that exists in all dust samples from the 9/11 detonations. Chemical Engineers, Structural Engineers, and Physicists, through peer reviewed journals, have proven that over 8 tons of this product was used in the 3 buildings that collapsed that day.
All of you Denialists are of the same ilk. Full of BS and buffoonery. We have the truth on our side. We have science on our side.
You, on the other hand, only have spoon-fed corpo-government pablum that has rendered you a media zombie. Bring it on. Bring it on.
Debate Me Reply:
September 14th, 2009 at 2:01 am
This channel has been compromised.
UGxlYXNlIGhlbHAgbWUuIFRoZXkgYXJlIGhvbGRpbmcgbXkgc29uIGhvc3RhZ2Uu
Debate Me Reply:
September 14th, 2009 at 2:02 am
Before you delete this
Ask yourself this
Soon something bad may happen
Every man for himself?
64
September 12th, 2009 at 4:23 pm
Questions will be asked… Who? or Why? is irrelevant
Without knowing How.. we can not know Who did What and Why
And Without Knowing HOW to Change… HOW COULD WE Change?
Just a Poem:
********************************************
I see the wolves in wool
I see the lambs sharp teeth
And in their eyes I see that they are blind and scared
Inside I feel no fear and they are well aware
they see me everywhere
they know we see through the keyhole into the door they closed
In our homes they broke to make us think we are alone
we grow, learn to pick up the phone, and ask more
And in numbers we grow larger and smarter
We know that we’re not alone and they are well aware, blind, and scared.
***********************************************
Those wolves deny what they are by hiding from us the power we have
We are the Numbers We are the Strength. If only we know it, we will we will.
September 12th, 2009 at 6:40 pm
vWRv3C kobaekygczko, [url=http://jwggzptvnvvv.com/]jwggzptvnvvv[/url], [link=http://qetdatyzzkgx.com/]qetdatyzzkgx[/link], http://oprougmdilpy.com/
September 12th, 2009 at 9:16 pm
Melchizedek was the Son of God,
http://www.transcendpolarisati.....merian.htm
jake hancox Reply:
September 13th, 2009 at 9:32 am
there is no god…. child
September 12th, 2009 at 11:22 pm
NO MATTER HOW BIG THE LIE ~ THE TRUTH CANNOT EVER BE CHANGED. Thank you so much Alex Jones and Charlie Sheen and God Bless you in Jesus Supernatural Name and Love for forging forward through all of the lies to get to the Truth. All of the lies will be exposed on the great and terrible day of the Lord Jesus’ return and every single soul who loves to believe such lies will reap nothing but Eternal Hellfire! Hallelujah and Amen…
September 12th, 2009 at 11:28 pm
NO MATTER HOW BIG A LIE ~ THE TRUTH WILL BE REVEALED ON THAT GREAT AND TERRIBLE DAY OF THE LORD’S RETURN. HALLELUJAH AND AMEN IN JESUS SUPERNATURAL NAME AND LOVE…
September 13th, 2009 at 12:06 am
I’m so glad that you stepped up Charlie. The media dug themselves a hole, and now your forcing them to keep diging or stand up. The more they attack you the better it is. The best thing they could do right now is blow there credibility. They seem to be out of control in the US media mostly, but ive seen some good coverage over seas. Were all beside you on this.
I truly think that the family members should get together and stage demonstrations that would be done at a very hi profile places. Because they could do allot more than anyone else could. This would also give the “Media” no more place to hide… and they could stop any further wars on HUMANITY! They would no longer be able to use there 1#, excuse for anything they do!
I want to thank the family members that have come forward and demanded answers
September 13th, 2009 at 12:36 am
nah, nah.. Good stuff, Mr. Sheen. Money well spent.
September 13th, 2009 at 12:46 am
I’m glad that CS had the opportunity, as only celebrity allows, to converse with the president about facts I’ve seen in “Loose Change” on YouTube. The best parts of the interview was the spontaneous banter between the two. Very entertaining. How could anyone actually think that the president doesn’t already have this information and quite a bit more that only the president would be able to see? I was pretty impressed with PBO’s quote for the PNAC doc that CS threw out. Well, that’s more than my two cents. Cheers and may the truth be accepted.
Porf Reply:
September 13th, 2009 at 5:02 pm
Hey idiot, this interview never happened. You Tinfoilers sure are a bright bunch, huh?
September 13th, 2009 at 1:10 am
Why are so many people not reading that this interview never took place? Charlie Sheen is just hoping to get Obama’s attention. He is doing a good job of it and it was written well. THERE WAS NO INTERVIEW. But Charlie brought up good points, lets make the most of it.
September 13th, 2009 at 1:28 am
oh sh#&. man, I feel dumb… f&#$ this website is misleading.
September 13th, 2009 at 4:03 am
This interview rings hollow. This never took place. It is obviously scripted. If so, CS is is employing a terrible strategy. He is being misleading, trying to present the president in a negative light before even getting the president’s take on the issue. This is a BS, underhanded strategy. Why not just create a website presenting his evidence, and publicly requesting an actual interview with the president or at least one of his representatives? The fact that he does not approach the issue with this kind of straight-forwardness, makes me, as a rational thinker, doubt his whole premise. WTF is going on here?
Porf Reply:
September 13th, 2009 at 5:01 pm
Why would Obama want to sit down with this idiot and discuss what he really thinks happened on 9/11? As if Obama gave 2 craps about what the Tinfoil Brigade has to say.
September 13th, 2009 at 4:06 am
Meanwhile, this whole interview with Alex Jones is full of nothing but rants. Why not use the interview to present evidence, give sources for his case and request public audience? What’s up?
September 13th, 2009 at 4:09 am
And the end of this interview is completely ridiculous! Some “letter.” A script written by CS, and spoken of as if an interview actually took place… Come on.
September 13th, 2009 at 7:57 am
Blah, blah, blah…
Anyone who actually believes this is BS. I wouldn’t be surprised if this was more crap put together by Michael Moore. If people actually believe that the president actually had a hand behind these horrible events should be ashamed of themselves.
And yes, wonderful Charlie Sheen. Just remember when he was going though his divorce with Denise Richards…he’s no saint. He’s a piece of garbage, just like this article.
jake hancox Reply:
September 13th, 2009 at 9:35 am
“If people actually believe that the president actually had a hand behind these horrible events should be ashamed of themselves.”
not only should you be ashamed of yourself your a f---ing embaressment to the human race. why would we be ashamed for logically looking at evidence
theres no shame here pal stick your f---ing head back in the sand wrap yourself in a great big star spangled banner and suffocate you mindless f---ing redneck
September 13th, 2009 at 9:39 am
wow that last guy got me a little angry…. hes probably texan, ive never understood that
“how can texans electrocute the retarded and still have a population” <—-patent pending , lol
if youd like to reply to any of my comments , as i wont be coming to check this,
or if youd just like to contact another keen mind on the issue my email is
jake_h3@hotmail.com
September 13th, 2009 at 11:21 am
go f--- yourself
September 13th, 2009 at 11:24 am
In my opinion, the “drum beat” for 911 truth has to reach the main stream media in a debate type forum; where all of the evidence is allowed to be presented unfiltered, to the American people. It should be a panel vs panel of experts on each side, and let the american people decide for themselves who is telling the truth.
I believe this is the direction that the 911 truth movement must take; we need to challange all the major networks to set this up, challange the govenment to provide the answers tothese questions!
Because the continued silence of both the main stream media and the government is, in my opinion, an ommission of guilt.
Lets get Bill Oreilly, Sean Hannity, Rush Limbaugh, Wolf Blitzer and the whole gang at Popular Mechanics against Alex jones, Ron Paul, Jessie Ventura and other prominent 911 Scholars.
Let the American people as well as the rest of the World see for themselves who is lying.
Peace
Porf Reply:
September 13th, 2009 at 4:57 pm
The only direction this “movement” is going is down…because this silliness is going nowhere. Bunch of wackjobs you are!
You want a panel vs. panel debate with “pro’s” from the “Truthers” side? LMMFAO!! That’s hysterical. What credible person would try to debate such idiocy? Man, you guys are delusional.
September 13th, 2009 at 11:52 am
Though charlies intentions are good, he’s speaking to the front man for the new world order itself. This proves nothing other than that. And that 9/1 was an inside job. obama proves himself unconstitutional when he advises against questioning the government. There is nothing more American that questioning, especially against the government. People with a brain know this, know it was an inside job, and know that Mr Berry here, not our f---ing president, is a FRAUD.
Impeach NOW.
Impeach NOW.
Impeach NOW.
Impeach NOW.
Impeach NOW.
Impeach NOW.
September 13th, 2009 at 12:40 pm
Nice script Charlie–trial balloon for an upcoming movie? Trying to use 911 to keep yourself on the cutting-edge of famous I see….I’m not convinced you really have Obama’s cadence nailed. You might want to work on your script’s dialog a bit more. Throw in words like “notion” and some of his other more commonly used phrases and it would be a LOT more believeable!
September 13th, 2009 at 1:15 pm
Dear Charlie,
That was awesome, on your part, at least. I wish that Mr. Obama were an honest man and that we could count on him to actually open up a real investigation into this matter, but it’s NOT going to happen. You yourself already listed a few of the MANY times where he has already gone back on his word. The man is a LIAR, plain and simple. I think that we are going to have to find someone else in the administration that is honest that we can turn to, and it’s NOT going to be any of Obama’s appointees, either. They are all as dishonest as he is.
I do thank you for bringing this problem to light. Because of your celebrity, you have been able to break through the barrier of “silence” that the media forced upon all the rest of us when we tried to question/expose the events of 9/11. Now, maybe we’ll be able to finally get some answers.
If there is anything that I can do to help you in your quest for the truth, please contact me at my email address and if I am able, I will do what ever is in my power.
THANKS AGAIN!
Sincerely,
Cynde L. Hammond
September 13th, 2009 at 1:53 pm
Good Job Charlie
September 13th, 2009 at 2:00 pm
Big waste of time reading that imaginary interview. I enjoy the facts but that was s---.
September 13th, 2009 at 4:54 pm
LMAO! After reading some replies here…some of you idiots actually believe that this interview happened! AHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
WOW, the Tinfoil Brigade has gone far crazier than I thought they were. You people need serious…..serious help.
The Telecrap Urinal Reply:
September 13th, 2009 at 5:44 pm
All of you Denialists are incapable of independent thought. It is typical of your ilk to slam the messenger when you can not debate the science behind the message.
If you want to debate, fine. Explain away the facts that Mr. Sheen presents. If all you want to do is insult people then kindly piss off. Trolls are not welcomed.
Porf Reply:
September 13th, 2009 at 5:59 pm
You know you’re “movement” is in trouble when you have someone like Sheen as a mouthpiece making up fictional interviews. I think it’s hilarious that a lot of you Tinfoilers think that this interview actually took place. Why would anyone with an ounce of credibility further this argument? Every single ounce of “proof” that you guys have presented has been thoroughly debunked by the real pro’s without a bias for the insane.
Get over yourselves…seriously. This world would be a better place without sick and twisted people like you and YOUR ilk.
The Telecrap Urinal Reply:
September 13th, 2009 at 6:08 pm
Ahh so ladies and gentlemen here we have a Denialist, who is also a troll, who spends a lot of time on a web site hurling insults and ridiculing people. One has to wonder why Mr. Troll is here. He offers nothing of substance to back his cause.
The Mad Ape Reply:
September 13th, 2009 at 6:10 pm
You and anyone else who denies that 9/11 was an inside job is either a shill or a loon. Why are you here? Is it lunacy or shill thrills?
f---wit
TMA
Porf Reply:
September 13th, 2009 at 6:13 pm
Because I enjoy watching you wackjobs have an orgasm over an interview that never took place. It’s actually quite hysterical! LMAO
You guys are several levels of sad and pathetic. Do you walk down the street with glasses that let you see who’s behind you so that The Man doesn’t sneak up on you and take you “out”?
Cletus Reply:
September 13th, 2009 at 6:21 pm
I am wit youse Porf. Ize throwed out my tin foil hat and 8 the hershe kiss. Nows I is juss az smard az youse and had joyned da ranks of denileizm.
All hale Obama YEAH YEAH
September 13th, 2009 at 5:50 pm
Charlie you really have put yourself out there. I’m in the UK and have been onto this lot for over 10 years, sadly I realised I was on the money the first time I heard the Alex Jones show. I do what I can here trying to alert people, but i’m certain that if they announced what was going on during the BBC evening news, most people in the UK would make a statement of horror and then carry on their day as though nothing was wrong. There is also a media blackout in the UK regarding the events happening in the USA. You have my support friend as does Alex and the team, Prison Planet member for a few years now. God bless you and help you all.
Highest regards
Barry Ward
September 13th, 2009 at 5:53 pm
oh, by the way…
DID NOT ANYONE NOTICE THE f---ED UP GUN AN FROM THE STUPID
DR IGNAZIUS PIAZZA?:::::
I MEAN COME ON
WHAT DA f--- IS THAT????
FRONT SIGT AND NRA ?
REALLY CHARLIE?
September 13th, 2009 at 6:23 pm
In all honesty I know that 911 was an inside job but I get paid by big brother to dis-inform everyone on this site. I know it does not work but I can not help myself. After all I am a loon.
Porf Reply:
September 13th, 2009 at 7:30 pm
Yawn….nice try Cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs.
Porf Reply:
September 13th, 2009 at 7:33 pm
Yawn…..nice try Cuckoo for Cocoa Puffs!
September 13th, 2009 at 9:00 pm
THE INTERVIEW NEVER REALLY HAPPENED, CHARLIE SHEEN WAS TESTING FOR DUMBs---S AND HE FLUSHED OUT A WHOLE BUNCH OF YOU. YOU’VE BEEN PLAYED. YOU’VETHE INTERVIEW NEVER REALLY HAPPENED, CHARLIE SHEEN WAS TESTING FOR DUMBs---S AND HE FLUSHED OUT A WHOLE BUNCH OF YOU. YOU’VE BEEN PLAYED. YOU’VE BEEN OWNED. BEEN OWNETHE INTERVIEW NEVER REALLY HAPPENED, CHARLIE SHEEN WAS TESTING FOR DUMBs---S AND HE FLUSHED OUT A WHOLE BUNCH OF YOU. YOU’VE BEEN PLAYED. YOU’VE BEEN OWNED.D.THE INTERVIEW NEVER REALLY HAPPENED, CHARLIE SHEEN WAS TESTING FOR DUMBs---S AND HE FLUSHED OUT A WHOLE BUNCH OF YOU. YOU’VE BEEN PLAYED. YOU’VE BEEN OWNTHE INTERVIEW NEVER REALLY HAPPENED, CHARLIE SHEEN WAS TESTING FOR DUMBs---S AND HE FLUSHED OUT A WHOLE BUNCH OF YOU. YOU’VE BEEN PLAYED. YOU’VE BEEN OWNED.ED.THE INTERVIEW NEVER REALLY HAPPENED, CHARLIE SHEEN WAS TESTING FOR DUMBSHTHE INTERVIEW NEVER REALLY HAPPENED, CHARLIE SHEEN WAS TESTING FOR DUMBs---S AND HE FLUSHED OUT A WHOLE BUNCH OF YOU. YOU’VE BEEN PLAYED. YOU’VE BEEN OWNED.ITS AND HE FLUSHED OUT A WHOLE BUNCH OF YOU. YOU’VE BEEN PLAYED. YOU’VE BEEN OWNED.THETHE INTERVIEW NEVER REALLY HAPPENED, CHARLIE SHEEN WAS TESTING FOR DUMBs---S AND HE FLUSHED OUT A WHOLE BUNCH OF YOU. YOU’VE BEEN PLAYED. YOU’VE BEEN OWNED. INTERVIEW NEVER REALLY HAPPENED, CHARLIE SHEEN WAS TESTING FOR DUMBs---S AND HE FLUSHED OUT A WHOLE BUNCH OF YOU. YOU’VE BEEN PLAYED. YOU’VE BEEN OWNED.THE INTERVIEW NEVER REALLY HAPPENED, CHARLIE SHEEN WAS TESTING FOR DUMBs---S AND HE FLUSHED OUT A WHOLE BUNCH OF YOU. YOU’VE BEEN PLAYED. YOU’VE BEEN OWNED.THE INTERVIEW NEVER REALLY HAPPENED, CHARLIE SHEEN WAS TESTING FOR DUMBs---S AND HE FLUSHED OUT A WHOLE BUNCH OF YOU. YOU’VE BEEN PLAYED. YOU’VE BEEN OWNED.THE INTERVIEW NEVER REALLY HAPPENED, CHARLIE SHEEN WAS TESTING FOR DUMBs---S AND HE FLUSHED OUT A WHOLE BUNCH OF YOU. YOU’VE BEEN PLAYED. YOU’VE BEEN OWNED.THE INTERVIEW NEVER REALLY HAPPENED, CHARLIE SHEEN WAS TESTING FOR DUMBs---S AND HE FLUSHED OUT A WHOLE BUNCH OF YOU. YOU’VE BEEN PLAYED. YOU’VE BEEN OWNED.THE INTERVIEW NEVER REALLY HAPPENED, CHARLIE SHEEN WAS TESTING FOR DUMBs---S AND HE FLUSHED OUT A WHOLE BUNCH OF YOU. YOU’VE BEEN PLAYED. YOU’VE BEEN OWNED.THE INTERVIEW NEVER REALLY HAPPENED, CHARLIE SHEEN WAS TESTING FOR DUMBs---S AND HE FLUSHED OUT A WHOLE BUNCH OF YOU. YOU’VE BEEN PLAYED. YOU’VE BEEN OWNED.THE INTERVIEW NEVER REALLY HAPPENED, CHARLIE SHEEN WAS TESTING FOR DUMBs---S AND HE FLUSHED OUT A WHOLE BUNCH OF YOU. YOU’VE BEEN PLAYED. YOU’VE BEEN OWNED.THE INTERVIEW NEVER REALLY HAPPENED, CHARLIE SHEEN WAS TESTING FOR DUMBs---S AND HE FLUSHED OUT A WHOLE BUNCH OF YOU. YOU’VE BEEN PLAYED. YOU’VE BEEN OWNED.THE INTERVIEW NEVER REALLY HAPPENED, CHARLIE SHEEN WAS TESTING FOR DUMBs---S AND HE FLUSHED OUT A WHOLE BUNCH OF YOU. YOU’VE BEEN PLAYED. YOU’VE BEEN OWNED.THE INTERVIEW NEVER REALLY HAPPENED, CHARLIE SHEEN WAS TESTING FOR DUMBs---S AND HE FLUSHED OUT A WHOLE BUNCH OF YOU. YOU’VE BEEN PLAYED. YOU’VE BEEN OWNED.THE INTERVIEW NEVER REALLY HAPPENED, CHARLIE SHEEN WAS TESTING FOR DUMBs---S AND HE FLUSHED OUT A WHOLE BUNCH OF YOU. YOU’VE BEEN PLAYED. YOU’VE BEEN OWNED.THE INTERVIEW NEVER REALLY HAPPENED, CHARLIE SHEEN WAS TESTING FOR DUMBs---S AND HE FLUSHED OUT A WHOLE BUNCH OF YOU. YOU’VE BEEN PLAYED. YOU’VE BEEN OWNED.THE INTERVIEW NEVER REALLY HAPPENED, CHARLIE SHEEN WAS TESTING FOR DUMBs---S AND HE FLUSHED OUT A WHOLE BUNCH OF YOU. YOU’VE BEEN PLAYED. YOU’VE BEEN OWNED.THE INTERVIEW NEVER REALLY HAPPENED, CHARLIE SHEEN WAS TESTING FOR DUMBs---S AND HE FLUSHED OUT A WHOLE BUNCH OF YOU. YOU’VE BEEN PLAYED. YOU’VE BEEN OWNED.THE INTERVIEW NEVER REALLY HAPPENED, CHARLIE SHEEN WAS TESTING FOR DUMBs---S AND HE FLUSHED OUT A WHOLE BUNCH OF YOU. YOU’VE BEEN PLAYED. YOU’VE BEEN OWNED.
alex Reply:
September 15th, 2009 at 3:17 am
huh..if you READ the document(,wich as incredible amounts of links and data),you ll find out that ;no it did not happen sweetheart…but a lil reading and study and use of your faculty to think,well, never hurts anyone..
C mon ,take a lil time to read and think..for yourself…
forgetthe paradigm Reply:
September 16th, 2009 at 6:59 pm
Moron!
September 13th, 2009 at 9:53 pm
….and you get these guys that all they have is just repeat a short message – can’t come up with anything inteligent.
September 13th, 2009 at 11:30 pm
how many people would have to be in on this???? 1000??? 3,000 people??? seriously you cant keep everybody silent. think about it,how many men are coming back from Iraq talking about war crimes??? the govt could’nt even cover up ABU ghrab,how r they going to cover up three buildings being attacked?? how did they plant super thermite in three buildings without noone noticing or saying anything??? wheres the plane that “didnt” hit the pentagon ,where are the passengers??? there are people who believe that we never landed on the moon,there are people who belive the moon itself was man made. listen to Art Bell just once,i dare you.and look up a book called “who made the moon??” there are crazy people everywhere…Charlie Sheen and his “Dianetics” reading hollywood freinds are screwing around…
Porf Reply:
September 14th, 2009 at 1:17 am
Way…waaaaaaaay to many people would have to be in on this loony idea. These people are so convinced of this silliness that they choose to ignore the obvious. These people are sad and I actually feel sorry for them….they must lead such pathetic existences.
September 13th, 2009 at 11:35 pm
Mr. Sheen,
can you help me find proof of the Yeti? It seems you like to chase mystical Wild Geese.
September 14th, 2009 at 2:09 am
this 20minutepiece originally appeared without saying that it had ‘not happened “yet”. and th dozens of posting pointing this out have all be deleted by infowars. something is seriously wrong with this situation creating a scenario where all intial enthusiastic comments were made by posters with teh 20minutes piece Looking like it was an actual transcript, not a ‘not for real”yet” pseudotranscript.
September 14th, 2009 at 2:16 am
Charlie Sheen is the man….I hope he can do this and whatever he wants to do.
September 14th, 2009 at 2:28 am
Great job… I doubt PBO will do anything spontaneously. Only under pressure of public outrage and threat of revolution anything will change.
Mr Sheen has prepared himself very well, and lays down the facts for others to see.
You have my respect, Charlie!!!!!!!
Peace & freedom, DjSadhu
September 14th, 2009 at 4:36 am
Thank you Charlie Sheen and Alex Jones:
I remember the day I saw Loose Change. I had never been into conspiracy theories, and just happened upon the video while surfing. Anyone who has actually seen what is presented by 9/11 truth KNOWS it was an inside job.
…
Porf Reply:
September 14th, 2009 at 5:36 pm
They only thing loose were a few screws in the kids head that made the video.
September 14th, 2009 at 7:23 am
The most damning evidence of all that 911 was not a government plot or conspiracy is:
Human nature! There is no way at all that the number of people who HAD to be involved could all keep their mouth shut. Anyone who has EVER been to high school, been in a relationship, had children, in short, been a human being, knows that that many people could NEVER keep this to themselves. END OF STORY. You will NEVER be able to explain that away. Keep talking, because nobody with any real sense is listening.
Brett A. Moore
US Navy (retired)
September 14th, 2009 at 7:57 am
Brett Moore, sir, high school, relationships, having children, are completely different in terms of personal safety. Be in the shoes of one of the individuals who has some explosive evidence that you were involved in…You don’t have all the pieces, all you have is ‘need to know’ information, it’s compartmentalized like the CIA, so you’re obviously not going to come out and risk being taken out with the rest of your family for some evidence that will just be spun by the media and denied by the establishment. No one who has all the pieces will come out. Those people are the ones responsible and they’re never going to admit it.
It’s quite simple, really.
END OF STORY.
September 14th, 2009 at 8:17 am
1) It’s about the facts written in the letter. Not Charlie Sheen. The facts that nobody answered.
2) About Obama..if he was different than Bush he would change his policy, he would get soldiers out of Iraq and Afghanistan, abolish “security” laws Bush made ofter 911 that end freedom, he would not give enormous money to banks in bank bailout that Bush started..etc.
THEY HAVE THE SAME BOSSES. THEY ARE OWNED BY SAME PEOPLE. They just play their parts, and let people spend their time and energy and freedom of personal power on left, right, white, black, christian, muslim, atheist and other things that lead them away from them stealing freedom and money from all of them. Divide & conquer..old Romans knew that already.
And all of you that talk about such dividing stuff here, and not about freedom and justice, and what is good and what is wrong in politicians actions..you are goverment spies or live in a big illusion and help bad things continue cause you take part in division that let the criminals stay in power.
Porf Reply:
September 14th, 2009 at 5:34 pm
Facts? LMMFAO!!!!!
Davor Reply:
September 15th, 2009 at 2:21 am
Your “answer”?
September 14th, 2009 at 8:40 am
JohnnnenyDoooey,
What happened to my first post about nano-thermite? Why was it removed? Talk about conspiracy. For the scenario that is painted by Mr. Sheen to have occurred, a vast network of people would have had to have been complicit. The plot would have required everyone from air traffic controllers to scientists, military contractors, military police, domestic law enforcement and everyone in between. It is ludicrous beyond the limits of believability or the bounds of credibility to assume that this many people, compartmentalized or not could have been involved. Generally, a plot between 10 people falls apart under individual scrutiny.
September 14th, 2009 at 9:11 am
Plain And Simple I LOVE IT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
September 14th, 2009 at 9:13 am
I find it hilarious that comments of people angry at the fact that this is fake keep getting deleted.
I guess only those who blindly follow the views of Alex Jones are allowed to speak the TRUTH.
You should change this site’s name to misinfowars.com. You’re clearly winning that war!
September 14th, 2009 at 9:29 am
Amen, brother…
September 14th, 2009 at 10:30 am
Good work Chuck!!
September 14th, 2009 at 11:23 am
I find it interesting that nobody here realizes that Obama is muslim, he’s not even black, those of you who wanted a black president didn’t get one… he’s ARAB. He was not born in Hawaii. Don’t think it’s a problem that he’s a muslim? Wait and see. He’s part of the problem, not the solution. The enemy is our president. Wake up, you people. Wake up. For the love of freedom, please, wake up.
September 14th, 2009 at 12:54 pm
Do a Google search: Charlie Sheen Dean Robinson
September 14th, 2009 at 1:23 pm
Um,
You do realize that this is a completely made up interview don’t you?
None of this actually happened. None of it. Except in Charlie Sheen’s head.
The main reason I know the interview is a complete fabrication, is the part where Charlie claims that Obama loves Two and a Half Men.
Nice try, Charlie… I am pretty gullible, but there’s no way I believe the President watches that crap.
September 14th, 2009 at 1:24 pm
Um,
You do realize that this is a make-believe interview don’t you?
None of this actually happened. None of it. Except in Charlie Sheen’s head.
The main reason I know the interview is a complete fabrication, is the part where Charlie claims that Obama loves Two and a Half Men.
Nice try, Charlie… I am pretty gullible, but there’s no way I believe the President watches that crap.
September 14th, 2009 at 1:24 pm
Um,
You do realize that this is a make-believe interview don’t you?
None of this actually happened. None of it. Except in Charlie Sheen’s head.
The main reason I know the interview is a complete fabrication, is the part where Charlie claims that Obama loves Two and a Half Men.
Nice try, Charlie… I am pretty gullible, but there’s no way I believe the President watches that nonsense.
September 14th, 2009 at 2:30 pm
Bravo! Two thumbs up to Charlie Sheen for being as open as he has been. It’s about time something happened, and that all of those criminals responsible are bought down for the sake of “real” democracy.
September 14th, 2009 at 3:21 pm
Hallo to the American God loving people. I am a Boer from South Africa. We have lots of problems ourselves, but we feel sorry for you. Your goverment have sold you out for five bob. They actualy hate the people of America.
The Jews killed 29000 woman and children 100 years ago is South Africa, and still try to kill us today. Currently one third of our Boere Farmers have been killed over the last 15 years.
These jews are running your country and have no respect for American’s lives. They have used these 9/11 terorist attacts to justify the killing of thousands more in a war which is nothing but a robbing of the oil in Iraq. And you guy’s is paying for it.
Any American who want to talk to us are welcome to contact me on propatria.hn@gmail.com
Regards
September 14th, 2009 at 3:44 pm
Author’s Note: What you have just read didn’t actually happen… yet.
… wow.
September 14th, 2009 at 5:33 pm
People, whether the letter was real or not is not the issue. Mr. Sheen has created a lot of publicity for 9/11 truth with this letter and video. He was rebutted on the O’reilly factor, not because they wanted to but because they had to. This video is all over the internet, millions of people have seen it, so they had to say something.
The powers-that-be desperately want 9/11 truth to go away. They want us to go back to sleep and remember the myth of 9/11. You know, Bin Laden and all that. Publicity like this keeps the 9/11 truth debate in the public eye.
That is the purpose of what Alex and Charlie are doing.
…
September 14th, 2009 at 5:46 pm
Wow. Charlie Sheen is a complete nut case.
September 14th, 2009 at 7:18 pm
Millions of people? haha.
The video hasn’t even reached 1 million views.
Omar Reply:
September 16th, 2009 at 6:38 pm
the fact that there are many illiterates like you does not man people are stupid, any person with a low IQ knows that 9/11 was orchestrated by Cheney to create a useless and immoral war so that the Bush Family could get super rich with their shares in the oil industry – remember oil went from $30/ barrel to $150 – Bush and his friends made hundreds of millions at the expense of the lives of poor American soldiers who were forced to fight the was that OBAMA FIERCELY OPOSSED!!!!
September 14th, 2009 at 8:06 pm
Why is everyone making it seem like he has “balls” for writing this? You know this is not real, right? Charlie Sheen never sat down with the President and had this talk – it’s just a made up act. My God, the URL for this page has “HOAX” in it for pete’s sake.
And even if you take it as some “artistic” means by which Charlie Sheen is trying to prove something on 9/11, show me a single shred of verifiable proof on any of these ridiculous claims. Seriously – you cannot fact check or verify any of this stuff. It’s all complete speculation at best.
September 14th, 2009 at 8:31 pm
I’m sorely disappointed to read more lies.
The points brought up in the ‘interview’ are vital to getting to the bottom of the 9/11 fiasco. However, the fact that both Alex Jones and Charlie Sheen faked an interview is subject to question of practical action behind this post. It seems as though it’s more of an attempt to rile people than to inform.
I’ll be sending emails to AJ and CS expressing my disappointment.
September 14th, 2009 at 8:58 pm
Are you guys retarded. He didn’t meet with obama. Its not a fake interview. He made this video to call out the president and the 20 questions he were to ask the president if they met. He is just asking questions like we all should be doing. The media spun this around.
September 14th, 2009 at 9:29 pm
Kuz , How do you ultimately prove the facts when the goverment controls every way to check them?
All the people on the planes died. The Pentagon is a goverment building so there was no way the public would ever get near it or be able to investigate it. The Twin Towers colapsed and all the debris was taken away and never allowed to be publicly tested. What little could be investigated has raised serious questions. Not just by average Joe’s but by top people in there fields who have the qualifications and experiance to question .
If the Goverment have nothing to hide why not allow a public investigation? only the guilty have something to hide dont they.
September 15th, 2009 at 2:33 am
I am glad to see goverment agents see this as important issue to spend their time writing comments. Most of their comments can be recognised:
1) They don’t answer any question Sheen asked. – spin the issue
2) They attack Sheen on the personal basis, not the letter itself. – spin the issue
3) They refuse to acknowlege the point to the letter(need to have a investigation), and stick to things like conversation didn’t happen(why is Obama not answering?) – spin the issue
4) They write things like “I am big 911 truther..but this time Alex is lying(yea right, 911 truther being angry at these questions asked) – spin the issue
5) They write things like: Obama is a muslim, thats awful..Jews are guilty for everything and should be “dealt” with..Obama is black,thats awful ..our goverment is space aliens-resist!..etc. – spin the issue and “show” people that question goverment as racist,lunatics etc.
NONE OF SUCH THINGS IS WHAT 20 minutes with the President or Charlie Sheen or Alex Jones ARE TALKING ABOUT. So either those comments are by goverment agents or by total idiots.
September 15th, 2009 at 3:47 am
The gift that Mr Sheen gave human kind is the reminder that someone can think and see,search and think,seek for themselves …Wich ,in his position,is the most couragous and honest act i have ever witness…What he has put on the line , in the name of what is genuine, just blows me away …
September 15th, 2009 at 6:24 am
“The gift that Mr Sheen gave human kind…”
You sure love the theatrical.
September 15th, 2009 at 8:43 am
Sheen what a legend ,, keep it up have them at the knees
September 15th, 2009 at 9:45 am
People… people. Government agents? Government agents have much better things to do than monitor obscure websites that espouse complicated conspiracy theories that have no basis in fact. They are hunting the very terrorists who murdered thousands of Americans on 9-11-01. Our government is riddled with small-time corruption, big-time corruption and seedy characters. We have womanizers, homosexuals (not that there’s anything wrong with that.), adulterers and probably child molesters. But what we don’t have, is a vast network of evil men that would kidnap American citizens, load planes with explosives and commit mass murder. Hell, without 9-11, we had justification to take that piece of trash Saddam Hussein out.
September 15th, 2009 at 1:30 pm
was it really necessary to pretend like Obama was a big fan of Sheen’s crappy sitcom?
Bob Reply:
September 16th, 2009 at 11:21 am
LOL…..
September 15th, 2009 at 2:41 pm
OBUMMER is such a loser.
Omar Reply:
September 16th, 2009 at 6:34 pm
if he is a loser that makes you lower than a donkey level – when you reach the level of donkey write something interesting asshole
September 15th, 2009 at 3:38 pm
Wow what a great interview. To bad nothing was answered and the responses were candid.
September 15th, 2009 at 3:54 pm
Incredible job!Thank you Charlie for doing the right thing by pointing out how our so-called “leaders” have not done the right thing.We now have critical mass to go with mountains of evidence and we have the initiative to force resolution.Keep up the good work!9-11 Truth and public safety are paramount.Those who attack 9-11 Truth do so from a position of weakness and in chess we call that a blunder.We win the debate hands down on the merits of the information(facts)we now know.That is why no one will debate you,the position they push cannot be defended.They should resign or prepare to be checkmated!Check to his majesty.
September 15th, 2009 at 4:05 pm
I’m amazed that so many of you actually believe this interview happened.
Did you not bother to read the disclaimer?
Sheesh.
September 15th, 2009 at 5:59 pm
I consider myself an informed skeptic, a skeptic of both sides. I’ve seen all the videos, many of them multiple times. I’ve read the blogs, and the articles, and listened to the podcasts. Given all of the research I have done, there is not enough to CONVINCE me that this was an inside job. That being said, there is MORE THAN ENOUGH evidence to raise serious questions about what we’ve been told. The “official report” given to us by the 9/11 Commission is incomplete, and falsified on many points.
If you read the “interview” again (I know it’s not real), not once does Charlie say that this is an inside job. He never directly blames anyone. All he is doing is pleading for answers to very real questions. If we, as Americans, know the absolute truth, why the secrecy? Why won’t they release the security videos of the plane hitting the Pentagon? Why won’t they declassify the documents that will prove their story? I won’t pretend to know WHAT is going on here, but it’s awfully fishy to me, and I commend Mr. Sheen for facing the public scrutiny of being a “tinfoiler” in the interest of uncovering the truth.
September 15th, 2009 at 6:11 pm
Do you have friends and family who just don’t get it about 911? Do you want to throw cold water in their face or just slap them and say “HEYWAKEUP!” Try this instead. Print one of these and calmly ask them to read it. You’ll be glad you did.
http://www.thegoodseed.com/Wha.....On%209.pdf
September 15th, 2009 at 8:53 pm
Here is a link to the Daily Show suggesting they do a show about Charlie Sheen’s letter and video. http://forum.thedailyshow.com/.....d.id=13610
Reply that you want to see this as a topic. Perhaps with enough replies we might get to them.
Bob Reply:
September 16th, 2009 at 11:20 am
Sad that Charlie and Alex need people to goto show forums and basically beg them to air something on it.
September 15th, 2009 at 11:00 pm
Thanks to you both for questioning the actions of our government. I hope that all americans will wake up and vote these crooks out of office!! I would like to believe that our “voting” still counts, but this too might be manipulated by the power elite. I fear the power elite hold all the cards, for if we revolt, they will bring in marital law and if we work through the system-well they control the system. It seems to me that heads they win and tails they win, but as for me, I will go down in a blaze of glory just like your brother in Young Guns!!
September 16th, 2009 at 12:45 am
the interview might have been made up, but the facts were true, and spelled out and stated in a very rational and true to fact form. the reason the interview was not real is because the president would never subject himself to have to answer questions having anything to do with the true facts of what really happened. there is way to much proof now to dispute that what happened was planned and created by our own government. But you can bet that this will get some heavy attention and by doing it the way he did it will get noticed. will it change anything, that is doubtful. but iif enough people in power with money speak out, and don’t wind up dead, maybe someday the truth will be told.
September 16th, 2009 at 1:20 am
Obama’s mottos
WAR IS PEACE
FREEDOM IS SLAVERY
IGNORANCE IS STRENGTH
Say hello to Big Brother
Omar Reply:
September 16th, 2009 at 6:32 pm
amen!!!!!
September 16th, 2009 at 3:39 am
I have read the entire interview and also all of the comments associated with it, and the thing that strikes me the most is the fact that so many people believed it was a real transcription of a real event. The people of the United States know that there is so much going wrong with government and many other facets of this society, that they are just grabbing for some kind of truth…and not just within the realm of the 9-11 “conspiracy”.
Some are just sheep.
Take the time and READ H.R.3200
Do you know what you believe in? Do you believe in what you know?
September 16th, 2009 at 8:05 am
Charlie Sheen and Alex Jones are all heroes, and so can we all be by promoting the truth and by being willing to stand up for it.
9-11 was an inside job.
September 16th, 2009 at 10:30 am
And i thought you were just another nut…my apologies, Charlie
September 16th, 2009 at 11:19 am
Well there is a contest for video makers to produce this as a film. 10,000 bucks for the winner. This is the 2nd phase of this so called Huge announcement, that Alex was hyping up as if he had Bill Clinton on or something.
Anyway there is no info on this 2nd phase on the site, you’d think Alex would slap this video contest on the homepage……remember according to alex Charlies letter (which was received as a ratings booster and not big news ) was only the 1st phase not the whole thing. Well now the second phase is here and it still feels non news worthy. I cant wait for the whole thing to be revealed……….so we can finally understand why Alex said this is the biggest thing he has ever done.
September 16th, 2009 at 12:07 pm
Thanks Charlie, long time coming. Charlie, you don’t really think the country is ready for this do you? We know this was planned and executed by the Conservatives none of whom are big enough to put down the partisan bickering long enough to say their guy did it and they should now be the one’s to unravel the mess. No way. They will never let the truth come out, particularly since the current POTUS is a Democrat.
Conservatives started these balls rolling. They did 911. They did the Patriot Act. They’re party removed any resemblance of a Democracy we had left, not Obama, heck,—he inherited the Bush/Cheney toolbox why pin this on him? Perhaps by Obama maintaining the toolbox, (Patriot Act, wireless surveillance, etc.) he calls more attention, quietly, more attention to these issues than abandoning these acts so that they melt into history unnoticed. I could go on and on but it would be to no avail.
Put it in a book, (others have). Maybe that will help future generations figure it out, it’s not coming any time soon —not if the conservatives have anything to say about it. There is simply too much partisanism — too vicious. Thanks again Charlie, good luck.
September 16th, 2009 at 2:05 pm
charlie and jones rock, true leaders of the free world
September 16th, 2009 at 3:01 pm
here is a new 911 song called “WakeUp” http://www.archive.org/details/WakeUp_542
September 16th, 2009 at 6:31 pm
This is epic. Great job Mr. Sheen….great job.
September 16th, 2009 at 6:44 pm
angelfire,
You need to get off the left v. right paradigm. There are no conservatives or liberals that’s all just mental masturbation. Thanks Charlie.
September 16th, 2009 at 7:25 pm
Hope you get your chance Mr. Sheen. I wish there were many more in your line of work who would do the same, might make a dent in this media war of truth.
September 16th, 2009 at 9:15 pm
f--- off, really? This interview has not been conducted? This is nothing to applaud for with the exception of creativity. I do hope he goes through with it but god damn that was moot. You had me going for a minute, I really was entrawled at the possibility the potus had taken an interview on 9-11.
This is not an issue to tease with, not something to slap each other on the back and say “gee wasn’t that great!” this is balls to the wall reality. So wake the f--- up and stop fantasizing. Bring results.
September 16th, 2009 at 11:25 pm
WOLVERINES !!!! God Be With Us , Thank you Charlie Sheen , Thank you Alex Jones !
Wolverines…. R.I.P Patrick Swayze
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1_I4WgBfETc
Don’t die before you search for the truth , and stand up like a free person against tyranny !!!
They killed John F. Kennedy , and they are still running things…. enough is enough !
September 17th, 2009 at 1:07 am
Isn’t it most likely that 9-11 was a failed coup d’ etat?
September 17th, 2009 at 1:12 am
Or perhaps the first stage of an upcoming coup d’ etat?
Christopher Reeve Reply:
September 20th, 2009 at 6:56 pm
careful what you say. almost like saying we should have routine assasinations. something to keep politicians honest. lol
obama threatens sheen “Of course this information worries me, yet it’s not nearly as worrisome as you sitting here today suspiciously implying that 9/11 was somehow allowed to happen or even orchestrated from the inside”.
what i read is, how dare you challenge us.
my favorite though is obama calling sheen a young man. hahahha. sheen is 45 years old.
September 17th, 2009 at 2:43 am
Wow!!!!
I’m from the UK, currently living in Trinidad and Tobago…..
This is something i’ve been saying for years regarding the WTC…..that something is very fishy going on.
Mr Sheen, keep on pushing for the answers and you have my utmost respect and support.
Respect
September 17th, 2009 at 7:31 am
Hello Mr.
Am an Arab Muslim religious man who specialized in the Islamic studies, and I believe that the former president (Bush) and his administration was involved by 9/11.
I have read before two years “The New Pearl Harbor, disturbing questions about 9/11 and the bush administration” by Mr. Ray Griffin.
And it was an amazing book, I don’t think that Mr.osama bin laden is an enemy for the U.S administration, I just believe that he work for the U.S interests.
For example, in 9/11 he gives Mr. bush the right to attack Afghanistan and Iraq, and of course the U.S interests here is for the Oil, because of that I have seen many articles in the Internet which described the recently U.S wars against Iraq and Afghanistan,
It was in a title “Bush’s Oil War”, and I absolutely believe it’s a right title.
I remember when I was visiting The United Kingdom Of Saudi Arabia before one year that I saw an Afghanistanian taxi driver, which it was seems to me that he is a good thinker, I was discussing with him 9/11 events and who was responsible for it, is it Osama bin laden or the U.S Administration?. Then he commented “Osama bin laden is a drama” he is just a fantasy, he was in the United Arab Emirat before a months from 9/11, so why they didn’t catch him there??
and that what I have read in The New Pearl harbor by Mr. Ray Griffin, he said that bin laden Received treatment at the hands of an American doctor in the united Arab Emirat before months from the terrorist attacks.
I even believe that the same thing goes with Al Qaeda, The world Intelligence control them,
In 2005 three huge popular Hotels was bombed in Jordan.
Then we saw at the T.V that the person who was responsible for these attacks was Al Qaeda.
I recently had a discussion with many policemen and medic men’s whom was working to help the dead and the injured people in that three Hotels, and I asked them, How could this terrorist man succeeded to pass the Many checkpoints front of the building??
“One of these popular Hotels was an American one, and there were many checkpoints in its doors”
These medic men couldn’t answer me, they were confused??
How did the terrorists succeed to pass all that checkpoints??
How did the Jordanian and the American security failed to even Notice these terrorist man??
After the explosions, it was appeared that one of the greatest Arab directors Mr. Moustafa Akkad was killed by these explosions,
I talked to many of Al Akkad friends in Syria and we had many discussions, which we end with concluding that these three explosions was targeting Al Akkad director.
There were many interests for the world intelligence to kill al Akkad,
Fist they want to distorts the image of Islam, because al Akkad was an Islamic director who was famous in Hollywood, he published and directed his great Islamic film
The message, so when his good American friends saw that Muslims were responsible for Al Akkads killing, this means that Muslims is terrorists.
Another interest is to stop Al Akkad good work, because he was in his way to direct a great film about the famous Islamic leader Salah Al Deen ,
Finally, Al Akkad sister Laila said that he faced a lot from the American Jewish in the U.S.A and they prevent him many times to show his films.
What I want to say after all, There is a big power in our world controlling everything to its interests, this is the world Intelligence.
In Iraq, we heard a lot that Al Qaeda group was responsible for many explosions which killed many Iraqi people in their Markets.
I have asked an Iraqi sergeant about this issue, and I said to him, How Could Al Qaeda did and do all this explosions in the Iraqi markets, and Killing Muslims is forbidden in Islam?
How could they succeed to kill more than 50 person in every market explosion and they didn’t succeed to did the same thing against the American soldiers in Iraq??
We didn’t ever heard that an explosion in iraq killed 50 U.S soldiers?
Is Al Qaeda an enemy for the U.S out of Iraq, and they are a friends in Iraq?
Of course, the sergeant Mr. has no reply.
What I want to say, It is Impossible for a group from five or even ten Arab persons succeed to Did 9/11 attacks,
When we saw Al Qaeda in the T.V we saw the old hand weapons, but we don’t see a nuclear weapon??
So is it possible that this simple groups succeeded to did all this explosions?
The American World Wide Intelligence Must Stop its play.
September 17th, 2009 at 7:34 am
“what i forget to say, thank u Mr.Sheen for this work, U R an Angel,
Keep the good work”.
aMMar
Palestine – Jerusalem
September 17th, 2009 at 8:21 am
I didnt read all the replies, so someone may have mentioned what I have to say. It’s frightening to think our government may have had anything at all do do with 9/11. But whats more frightening than that is the why of it. Poloticians and governments would not do something like this if there was nothing to gain from it. And what did we gain? A war with Iraq. Why would a war with Iraq be so important to those in power that they are willing to murder all those people to gain approval for said war? Especially when we were told Bin laden and the taliban were responsible, not Saddam Husein. WMD? Well, we werent attacked with WMD’s. We were told civilian airliners used. In any case, no WMD’s were found in Iraq, but I digress.
Dress it up any way you like, but the war in Iraq was not about any of the things we were told. It centers on oil. Money. Its revolting to think all those civilians died, not to mention those in uniform fighting the war who have fallen, so our president and top government officials could line their pockets with gold.
The only other possibility I can think of is still oil related, but much more frightening. I suggest anyone that reads this googles “peak oil theory” The gist of it is that the fossil fuel crude oil may be running out. It is after all a non renewable resource, it cannot last forever. I cant go into all the details here, but I strongly suggest you do some research on it.
Either way, it will come to the same if the government did in fact have anything to do with 9/11. Whether it was done for money, or a last grab for a dwindling resource, that would be the spark that sets this county, if not the world on fire.
The government of course does not want the kind of change the truth woud bring. Which is why I dont believe they will ever admit the truth, no matter what evidence is presented. I’m very gratefull to you jsut the same Mr. Sheen. Thank you for asking the questions that need to be answered. Thank you for standing up and demanding the people be heard.
September 17th, 2009 at 8:54 am
I can’t find ANY links anywhere on the internet confirming that 6 out of 10 of the 9/11 Commission members doubt the official story and say it’s a fraud. Someone please link me. I can’t find it anywhere.
9/11 was not an inside job Reply:
September 17th, 2009 at 1:09 pm
Doesn’t exists, that’s why you can’t find it.
I agree with ron paul that there is no gov. conspiracy in 9/11. The facts just don’t add up to an inside job.
September 17th, 2009 at 10:02 am
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v.....re=related
This video contains some great information, talking about these people that Alex Jones calls Cointelpro. This has opened my eyes to whats going on.
September 17th, 2009 at 10:42 am
readers, please what is ur opinion about what i wrote above?
Amuart Reply:
September 17th, 2009 at 11:37 am
I think it’s your honest opinion, and I’m sure you appreciate the fame this is gaining (because of the Global smear campaign against people of Semetic/Arabic descent), it’s like this if Obama does respond and they do this interview, look who’s doing the questioning, Charlie Sheen…not Us (The People). We don’t need anyone to speak for us, isn’t this what Alex Jones has been telling us? To stand up and Voice our own Opinion?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v.....re=related
September 17th, 2009 at 1:08 pm
I agree with ron paul that there is no gov. conspiracy in 9/11. The facts just don’t add up to an inside job.
Jaysin Reply:
September 18th, 2009 at 3:43 am
what are the facts that it wasn’t an inside job?
September 17th, 2009 at 2:57 pm
obama totaly dont care about this :/
September 17th, 2009 at 6:11 pm
PLEASE LETS ALL ASK CHARLIE SHEN TO DONATE 1 MILLION DOLLARS TO INFO WARS/////TO HELP THE TRUTH MOVEMENT///LETS ASK HIM TOO HELP ALL AMERICANS IN OUR TIME OF CRISIS /HE IS A VERY COURAGEOUS MAN/////THIS IS MY IDEAL ONLY///////PEACE
Jaysin Reply:
September 18th, 2009 at 3:43 am
i agree with the money thing, alex doesnt like taking money from people. Yet he is forced to advertise and count every dollar. I sure the income from just one of charlies show’s would be enough.
September 17th, 2009 at 7:15 pm
Holy s---!!!
That was great, cant believe the ending though, thought it really happened, I was hoping it was.
Mr.Sheen you have balls, and this Irish guy says thanks.
September 18th, 2009 at 7:12 am
I hope the well written Hollywood story will not crush all hopes of an interview. I think it can be used by the major networks to further discredit Charlie Sheen, 911 Truth and Alex Jones.
The presidents handlers could use elements of the story to build counter points and kill all living witnesses.
I truly think this will backfire.
September 18th, 2009 at 9:32 am
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FqMjb208t9M
Check it out, it’s got some very vital information.
September 18th, 2009 at 11:35 am
OBAMA IS A PUPPET TO SUPER RICH ELITISTS
WHAT GOOD IS CHARLIE SHEEN GUNNA DO IN 20 MINS WITH THIS GUY!
BRING IT TO PUBLIC ATTENTION??? LIKE MOST OF US DONT ALREADY KNOW!!!
EVEN IF HE DOES OPEN ANOTHER INVESTIGATION DONT YOU THINK THEY’LL JUST COME OUT WITH THE SAME RESULTS???
SOMETHING MUCH MUCH MUCH BIGGER NEEDS TO HAPPEN BEFORE HUMANITY REALLY WAKES UP!!
September 19th, 2009 at 7:36 pm
Charlie, THANK YOU for your courage on this matter. Only an idiot wouldn’t take you seriously. I watch your show regularly to make sure your ratings stay up and I rarely watch TV!
As a criminal justice professional, there is no way the “official story” is anything but conspiracy. They can’t even answer why NORAD was told to stand down, that would only open more questions. Shame on the fake patriots of this country and kudos to the truth tellers who demand answers.
September 19th, 2009 at 10:02 pm
Most of the people posting here are desperately in need of some understanding of how the world actually works. Most of this supposed evidence of cover-ups and conspiracies in this interview is completely ho-hum. So there were fighter jets on training 200 miles away that didn’t respond? Wow. Who cares. Has there ever been a crime committed where the police were nearby and didn’t do anything? Couple of billion times? And a couple of higher-up government guys cancelled flights on 9/11. Hello? These kind of people fly half the year. They probably cancelled 20 other flights in 2001 alone. The rest of the “proof” is just fabricated. What 16-foot hole in the Pentagon? The aerial photos I saw showed a chunk of a wing of a building completely devastated. Here’s a tip: if you’re gonna try to build a career or impress a girl or whatever by coming up with some conspiracy idea, get some decent facts first, because this is nothing. Really, it is beneath notice, which luckily is where the rest of the world is at with it. They don’t care because they shouldn’t care because nothing is going on here.
Bill Reply:
September 22nd, 2009 at 4:16 am
Shut you gullible sheep!!! Enjoy the fema camps…
Jan Doe Reply:
September 22nd, 2009 at 11:13 am
FEMA Camps! WHAT?! What is FEMA??? NO joke, there is one hell of a surprise learking behind the scene in this country, FEMA and the rest of the gov’t certainly isn’t looking out for us…that’s evident. Thank God for Jesus! Makes it all worthwhile.
Jan Doe Reply:
September 22nd, 2009 at 11:19 am
Sunny Dee: Somewhere along the lines you are willingly, subjecting yourself to deceipt on a large scale. You don’t buy into the “fabricated” facts…well, there are several hundred of documentaries, live video footage, and a mass amount of other factual information that have compiled the so-called “conspiracies” out there. The people making comments have no “understanding of how the world actually works”? Well I’d say your statements that follow tend to amke it pretty evident that you in fact are just as oblivious to how the government works as the rest of us are to the way the world works. I would say that backing up your statement of the lack of presence/assistance of fighter jets with another example of how the government has failed on numerous occasions does not create much of a defense or sound reasoning to believe a lie. There is def something/everything sketch about 9/11 and what the government is conveying to have taken place…that is a fact.
September 20th, 2009 at 6:27 pm
hahaha obama calls sheen a young man. hahaha. he is only three years older then him. way to go Charlie Sheen you rock. obama made it clear which side of the fence he sits on and i hope it is remembered when the truth is told.
man another 10 minutes and obama would have broke down and cried. talk about deer in the headlights. hahaha
September 20th, 2009 at 7:44 pm
oh what a load of tripe. this is fake, sheen hav eyou lost your marbles?
September 21st, 2009 at 7:51 pm
Way to go Charlie! I am so glad you are doing this great work and doing such a great job at it! I am very pleased with your work. Let’s all hope we see the right changes for good come out of your good works! I know that miracles can and do happen! Bless you Charlie!
September 22nd, 2009 at 12:21 am
God Bless Charlie, a patriot and a real person.
They can’t ignore us too much longer, time is running out. I suspect they are already discussing who will be the scapegoat for this treason. Eventually the house of cards must tumble.
The fact that I’ve not seen any mention of any of this in the MSM indicates how close to the truth we are. I watch all the network “news” and there hasn’t been word one about Charlie and this action – not even the statement he was going to make on the red carpet on Sunday.
Seems like they are so scared they’re not even daring to bash this brave man. About time Americans were concerned with murder, treason and criminal war instead of what designer you’re wearing.
How can anyone with any brain power fail to see the truth of the physics involved on 9/11? We should be ashamed as a nation that we have become so gullible! The founding fathers should shoot us as traitors!
Not Afraid and Not Buying It Anymore!
Bill Reply:
September 22nd, 2009 at 4:13 am
Amen!!!
September 22nd, 2009 at 1:09 am
Read Author Jim Marrs book, “The Fourth Reich,” in the book Mr. Marrs describes how WTC was demolished due to Prescott Bush’s files of evidence from Union Bank, which he received $1,500,000.00. Prescott Bush is the Father of President George H. W. Bush and Grandfather of President George H. Bush. Union Bank was a shell bank for the German Nazi party during World War II, which Prescott Bush was employed by Union Bank.
If you don’t believe me, buy the book and find it for yourself.
September 22nd, 2009 at 3:26 am
Uh, what’s with the fake interview? It seems kinda lame, as does the cheesy video message.
You’re Charlie Sheen, man!! Call him up and ask for an actual meeting!!