July 30, 2012
Washington’s agenda involves death squad diplomacy. Evidence mounts proving it. It’s standard practice in all US direct and proxy wars. It’s how America treats its enemies.
Massacres and unspeakable atrocities are committed. Women are raped. Civilians are treated like combatants. They’re indiscriminately killed.
Others are targeted for opposing US aggression. Children are harmed like adults. Prisoners are tortured. No crime’s too gruesome to commit.
Lies, duplicity, and coverup follow. Media scoundrels bear direct responsibility. Their hands are bloodstained like US officials, forces and proxy killers.
Vietnam’s Operation Phoenix became a prototype for today’s wars. It included intimidation, kidnappings torture, and mass murder. At issue was eliminating opposition elements. Terrorizing people into submission was policy.
Southeast Asia tactics are replicated in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, and Syria. Barbarism defines US policy.
On July 11, German writer Jurgen Todenhofer confirmed the presence of Al Qaeda insurgents in Syria. He met with them, he said. He holds them and others like them responsible for mass terror attacks.
He described a “massacre marketing strategy.” He called it “among the most disgusting things that I have ever experienced in an armed conflict.”
He added that Western media distort what’s happening on the ground. Viewers and readers know it’s their stock and trade. They’re paid to lie. Journalists dedicated to truth and full disclosure need not apply.
On July 24, Asia Times writer John Rosenthal headlined “German intelligence: al-Qaeda all over Syria,” saying:
“German intelligence estimates that ‘around 90′ terror attacks that ‘can be attributed to organizations that are close to al-Qaeda or jihadist groups’ were carried out in Syria between the end of December and the beginning of July, as reported by the German daily Die Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (FAZ).”
Die Welt and Bild published similar reports. All three name Al Qaeda behind the May 25 Houla massacre. Russian journalist Marat Musin was there. He said hundreds of “bandits and mercenaries” were responsible.
Washington’s imperial tactics involve cutthroat killer atrocities. Human lives have no value. Only wealth, privilege and dominance matter. US officials don’t keep body counts. Objectives are pursued lawlessly.
Rosenthal cited Die Welt contributor Alfred Hackensberger. Taldo is part of Syria’s Houla region. Insurgents controlled it for months, said Hackensberger. They bear responsibility for Houla killings.
He visited the area. He interviewed an eyewitness. He left him unidentified for his safety. He was at Qara’s Saint James Monastery. Victims were pro-Assad Sunnis, he said. Many people know what happened but won’t say “out of fear for their lives.”
“Whoever says something can only repeat the rebels’ version. Anything else is certain death.”
Hackensberger related similar stories. A former Qusayr resident said Christians and others refusing to “enroll their children in the Free Syrian Army” were shot. He held “foreign Islamists” responsible.
“I have seen them with my own eyes,” he said. Pakistanis, Libyans, Tunisians and also Lebanese. They call Osama bin Laden their sheikh.”
A Homs Sunni resident told Hackensberger he witnessed armed insurgents stopping a bus. “The passengers were divided into two groups: on one side, Sunnis; on the other, Alawis.”
Nine Alawis were decapitated.
“That the German government would cite national interest in refusing to disclose its information (publicly) concerning the circumstances of the Houla massacre is particularly notable in light of Germany’s support for the rebellion and its political arm, the Syrian National Council (SNC).”
It plays a quiet behind the scenes role, he added. Its foreign office is involved in developing “political transition” plans.
So is former US Saudi Arabia ambassador Prince Bandar, reports Haaretz. His close ties to the Bush family earned him the nickname “Bandar Bush.”
For years he’s been involved with Washington’s Syria regime change plans. He now serves as Saudi intelligence chief. He’s also National Security Council secretary-general.
His intelligence appointment involves “preparing for the next stage in Syria,” said Haaretz. His wife has Al Qaeda “connections.” He’s considered “CIA’s man in Riyadh.” He’s “known as a can-do” guy.
He spares nothing to achieve objectives. He participated directly in America’s Contra wars. He helped fund Central American death squads and Afghan mujahideen fighters against Soviet forces.
He’s active in current Washington plans to depose Assad. Like other US allies, his hands are bloodstained.
In her daily press briefing, State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland condoned the murder of Syrian officials. She justified her position, saying they “organize(d) Assad’s military campaign….”
She tried having it both ways, adding “we don’t condone violence of any kind.” She ignored Washington’s direct role in orchestrating it.
US rhetoric about supporting human rights and other democratic values rings hollow.
America is the world’s worst human rights abuser. It spurns democracy. It’s intolerant at home and abroad. It’s hardline, belligerent and repressive.
Saying one thing and doing another is policy. At the same time, it audaciously points fingers at China.
On July 25, Bloomberg headlined “US Finds China’s Human Rights Situation Is Deteriorating,” saying:
According to Assistant Secretary of State for Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor Michael Posner, conditions in China are worsening. We have human rights issues in America, he added. He left unsaid how US policy spurns them at home and abroad.
Do as I say not as I do is policy. So is practicing wrong over right. Interfering in the internal affairs of other countries blatantly violates international and constitutional law.
Doing it by direct or proxy belligerence adds crimes of war, against humanity and genocide. Justice Robert Jackson called aggressive war “the supreme international crime against peace.”
Convicted Nazis were hanged. America repeatedly gets away with murder unaccountably.
A July 25 Washington Post article provided more evidence, saying:
Free Syrian Army fighters have safe havens in Turkey. In Antakya, they “stride through its narrow streets sunburned and sweaty from the battlefield, hoping to meet benefactors to provide them with money and arms.”
“Salafi Muslims, who have come to offer help from the countries of the Persian Gulf region, huddle over kebabs, their long beards and robes conspicuous in secularist Turkey.”
Ankara officials are largely tight-lipped. Little is said about “rebel fighters” passing freely cross border to Syria and back. Military trucks ferry weapons into Syrian territory.
Turkish authorities deny what independent observers confirm. Officials claim only humanitarian aid is provided. At the same time, Hurriyet daily headlined “PM declares Syria intervention a ‘natural right,’ ” saying:
Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan said Syrian-based Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) elements give Turkey the right to intervene. “We will not tolerate PKK cooperation with other organizations in the area,” he said.
This, earlier hostile comments, and Turkey’s provocative violation of Syria’s airspace suggest Ankara’s looking for a pretext to intervene.
Washington calls the shots. Erdogan’s a useful tool. He’s complicit in US regime change plans. Whether he’ll initiate preemptive cross-border attacks remains to be seen.
It’s unclear if Israel plans getting involved. Recent tax increases were announced. Mossad-connected DEBKAfile says they’re “steps towards a $25-30bn war budget.”
Israel already spends an enormous amount on militarism. Like America, it does it at a time it has no enemies except ones it invents.
Between militarism, settlement construction, and corporate favoritism, little remains for domestic needs mattering most to ordinary Israelis.
Whether Israel plans more war won’t be known unless or attacks confirm it. Threats alone don’t signify policy. Netanyahu and other Israeli officials make them often. On July 25, Defense Minister Ehud Barak said:
Israel faces “tough and crucial (security) decisions. I am well aware of the difficulties involved in thwarting Iran’s attempts to acquire a nuclear weapon.”
“However, it is clear to me that without a doubt, dealing with the threat itself will be far more complicated, far more dangerous and far more costly in resources and human life than thwarting it.”
Israel may or may not be planning to confront Syria. On July 24, IDF Chief of Staff General Benny Gantz was ambiguous about an alleged Damascus chemical and biological weapons threat.
On the one hand, he urged caution. On the other, he said Israel might “find itself in a wider conflict that it planned” if military operations against Syria are initiated.
He left unexplained what he meant except to suggest attacking WMDs may have unintended consequences. He added that IDF policy sometimes means engaging in action. At other times, it’s about holding back.
The Syrian pot is boiling. Both countries share a common border. Full-scale war could spill over. Syria run by extremist elements means anything going forward is possible.
Israel, Western states and regional allies plan regime change. Achieving it might bring more than what they bargain for.
Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at firstname.lastname@example.org.
This article was posted: Monday, July 30, 2012 at 1:01 pm