If I knew what you were attempting to say, I could pass comment.
You must be somewhere in that labrynth of lies and misinformation over 9/11

Son, you tool, number 1 that is worse than a conspiracy because it would show that the US has ZERO defense even though we spend TRILLIONS on it. The last time I checked Stealth Bombers are now out of date so I wouldn’t call it inneptitude you damn fool. I am sorry, when Osama goes uncaught when there are millions of troops all over the Middle East, over 100 nations, hundred billion dollar space equipment, and air forces, and navy forces all over the world looking for one man, I would believe in Superman alien creatures before I would believe one human man pull that off you dumbo head. HOW DUMB ARE YOU?

Number 2, everything the fake terrorists attacked us for, i.e., taking your freedom, the Skull and Bones administration formed a Deutscheland security/Homeland security, and one upd the Hiler Enabling act with a Patriot act and Military Commissions act. So it does not take a smart person to realize Osama attack America because we are free as Illuminati at Yale member Bush said, AND WHAT DID THEY DO….THEY TOOK YOUR FREEDOM? So, it is clear who is being 911, it is clear there was a stand down.

Because there were no commercial planes on 911 at any of the 4 locations…what else would this explain or allow to be predicted following 911?

It would mean that authorities would try to immediately remove and destroy ANY and ALL debris from 911. Did that happen?

It would mean that the criminals who perpetrated 911 will do anything to avoid an investigation…unless they themselves could choose who and what was to be investigated….only as a last resort of course. Was the investigation thwarted, denied, or delayed for any length of time following 911? Did the criminals get to hand pick who would be on the investigation?

No planes would mean there would be serious discrepancies and questions of authenticity regarding any videos taken on 911. It would mean despite the number of alleged videos that would surface AFTER 911, not the day of, that no 2 videos would show the exact same “plane” in the exact same way doing exactly the same thing. For example….one video might show a light plane and another plane that was pitch black. One would show it dive bombing and another showing it going perfectly horizontal. One would show wings another would be missing wings. One would show something “underneath” the plane….another would show no such thing. One would have a deafening roar…another almost an audio whimper. Did that seem to happen with the videos that were turned in AFTER 911?

No commercial planes on 911 would expose the US media to possible fraud, deception, and serious accusations of foreknowledge and complicity. Just talking about video the DAY OF 911….how much video did the world really see? Did MSM show the entire path of the 2nd “plane” on 911…and if so…how much did it capture considering there were dozens of news helicopters in the air at the time of the 2nd strike? How much was shown the day of 911 by MSM…and how did it compare to video released after 911? (The combined footage of the 2nd strike on 911 by the MSM totaled a combined SEVEN SECONDS!!!! From 5 “vantage points”.) The entire world saw only 7 seconds of footage the DAY OF 911. Only days later after the FBI and Secret Service had time to “vet” the videos did they appear….similar to Evan Fairbanks video where he openly admits that FBI took his video from him immediately after he filmed.) Question is….are there serious problems with the authenticity of any video provided by anyone? Because there were no planes…ALL the videos would then be considered suspect and show wide ranging optical differences even though they filmed the identical same thing?

Did someone capture by video the 1st plane striking…..and was it by miraculous luck? Who took it and where are they now? According to historians…the footage was taken by the Naudet Brothers who just happened to be at the most perfect spot in all on NYC with blocked traffic and a false emergency call with the very firemen who would be first on the scene at the WTC’s. (Interesting to note that the company he was with although first on the scene had ZERO casualties on 911….the only company to do so. They were the first in….and the first ones out! The Naudet brothers had personal and professional ties to the leaders of this particular fire company. Read this entire 10 part series to get an idea of just how lucky the Naudet brothers were. http://www.spingola.com/JULES%20NAUDET%207.htm Have the Naudet brothers disappeared off the face of the earth by any chance? Are they completely MIA never having done anything else other than produce this fireman’s video?

No commercial planes on 911 would mean that there would never be any verifiable wreckage ever presented to anyone outside of the crime itself. Is that the case? Is anyone on the planet allowed to physically verify ANY piece of airline debris outside of the Bush White House or US government?

No planes would mean that there would be high percentages of witness testimony with much of the testimony saying that it may have been a missile or rocket being completely ignored, ridiculed, thwarted, or in some cased even punished for mentioning. Is that the case? Has the government redacted almost all of the statements regarding precise descriptions of a missile or rocket or something other than a commercial aircraft? Have they legally threatened anyone in military, police, law enforcement, or firefighting from coming forward to give a different version of events and what was seen and done?

No planes would also mean that the buildings were brought down by something other than jet fuel. Is that the case? Does it appear that something else brought 3 separate buildings down in free-fall speed….or that something else impacted the Pentagon or Shanksville? Considering the overwhelming evidence of demolitions at the WTC’s, which by the way, all videos show the EXACT same thing of the demolition….though no 2 videos show the “plane” impact as identical?!!! Because there was no plane there would be no jet fuel. No fires could be attributed to the fuel. There would also be no smell of fuel at any of the sites. Is that the case? The smell of jet fuel at all 4 locations would be overwhelming and possibly last for months and years. (I personally have been to a crash site ONE YEAR after it took place and it still smelled of jet fuel.)

Because there were no commercial planes on 911….all subsequent wars, invasions, laws, murder, renditions, tortures, land grabs, money spent, agencies developed, soldiers killed…would have been in vain and based entirely on a fabricated, orchestrated, and conspired lie. Based only on actions over the last 8 years….does that sound like something the Bush White House would do by any chance? Have there been other examples of psychotic behavior and threats regarding its own citizens by any chance?

What else could be explained by the fact there were no commercial planes on 911? And what are the implications?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I2WdSyD769M