Christina England
VacTruth.com
January 25, 2010
Years ago children were sent up chimneys or sold as servants to earn their parents extra money. Now they are being vaccinated by doctors, to boost their takings. Doctors, Governments and Pharma see our children as their property and are making thousands of pounds/dollars/euros out of them right under our noses. This, they call ‘Health Care’, I call it the legalization of child labour.
For years now we have been told that vaccines are good for us, that vaccines eradicate illness and that vaccines will save us from killer diseases. What we are not told is that the doctors and Governments telling us this are often linked to the drug companies who are manufacturing the vaccines that they promote and many are making thousands of pounds/dollars profit from vaccinating our children.
Let us begin at the bottom and start with the GP. In the UK every time a vaccine is given to us by our trusted GP they are paid. The British Medical Journal published an article GPs make deals with local NHS to vaccinate children against swine fluexplaining how that every single child who is vaccinated with the H1N1 in the UK will earn the GP #5.25.
In Ireland the GP’s are paid five times this amount, for the seasonal flu shot. The article Irish Times – Irish GP’s paid five times UK rate for flu vaccine report that in Ireland a GP will earn a staggering [euro]38.95 per vaccine, making vaccines a very lucrative business indeed.
As far back as 2002, GP’s were so keen to get their hands on this extra money that they were striking off their lists the children who had not had the MMR because if they (the GP’s ) did not meet the Government target rate of 90% immunization, they would not earn their #2865 vaccination bonus Daily Telegraph – Children without MMR jab struck off GP’s list reports tells the full story.
In another article The campaign for Gardasil Flawed it is reported that Merck actually seeks out and trains doctors to lecture for them on Gardasil, paying them $4,500 each time they lecture on the Gardasil vaccine. Doctors are making thousands of dollars doing this.
This is nothing new and is not just attributed to vaccines. Doctors have been doing this for years.
In the article Ex-Drug Sales Rep Tells All – ABC News
one drugs representative spills the beans and tells a Congressional committee what really goes on. Speaking about Eli Lilly he told the committee:-
“To sell their drugs, pharmaceutical companies hire former cheerleaders and ex-models to wine and dine doctors, exaggerate the drug’s benefits and underplay their side-effects”
Shahram Ahari, who spent two years selling Prozac and Zypraxa for Eli Lily, told a Senate Aging Committee chaired by Sen. Herb Kohl, D-Wisc., that his job involved ” rewarding physicians with gifts and attention for their allegiance to your product and company despite what may be ethically appropriate.”
[efoods]Ahari claimed that drug companies like hiring former cheerleaders and ex-models, as well as former athletes and members of the military, many of whom have no background in science to wine and dine the doctors explaining the wonderful benefits of the drug they are employed to sell.
Higher up the you have leading figures in the medical profession who advise Governments on vaccine policies have strong links and alliances with the drugs companies helping them peddle their wares.
The article Children Risk Untested Flu Vaccines in Hyped Pandemic – Child Health Safety shows some very interesting links with the key figures who advise our Governments and drug companies.
Dr Salisbury the Medical Director for the Department of Health and a key figure in the JCV I who advises the UK Government on vaccine policies is shown to be linked by association with drug companies.
“Dr Salisbury is also linked by association to drug companies. Dr Salisbury as the Medical Secretary for the Department of Health is also a member of the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation. The JCVI has the task of approving UK vaccines. Many JCVI members have declared interests in a variety of drug companies when discussing the flu pandemic [ “JCVI meeting on 13th February 2008]. These financial ties include vaccine manufacturers Merck, GlaxoSmithKline, Sanofi Pasteur and Novartis. The JCVI is reportedly involved in attempts to hide evidence that the MMR vaccine can cause brain inflammation and permanent brain damage. [“Vaccine E-Newsletter March 20, 2009 Vaccine Bullies & Fighting Back by Barbara Loe Fisher]”
Another Government figure found to be linked to drugs companies is Kathleen Sebelius The US Health and Human Services Secretary. She has been found to have strong links to Glaxo Smith Kline.
In early 2009 the US Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius told The Associated Press that she was urging school superintendents around the USA to spend the summer preparing for the possibility that schoolchildren could be first in line for swine flu vaccine in the fall, if the USA Government decided to go ahead with mass vaccinations:-
“If you think about vaccinating kids, schools are the logical place,” She said. [“Kids May Get Swine Flu Shot First Lauran Neergaard June 16th 2009]
However, she did promise careful surveillance. Sebelius has strong alliances to drug companies. [“GlaxoSmithKline website] announced her appointment stating that she could work with them to save ‘World Health’ and get out of the ‘Healthcare mess’, if they (GSK) gave the Government the ‘right attention'”
So can we trust the doctors and the Governments to keep our children safe? Sadly it seems that many are not really putting the safety of their patients before their ever increasing pay packets. Their loyalty is to the drug companies and not their patients, so what is the truth about the vaccinations used today?
Fortunately for us, we have a strong and growing army of ‘real doctors‘, who are less interested in the ‘nice little earners’ are more interested in keeping the public informed and safe. They have a very different view of what vaccines are doing to our health and our immune systems.
Dr Viera Scheibner a well trusted doctor, Principle Research Scientist (Rtd) and now prominent public campaigner,is so sure of her facts she sent a letter to the Medical Observer, an Australian medical newspaper. This letter by Dr Viera Scheibner , was sent to and published in the Medical Observer, an Australian medical newspaper, in February 1999.
She challenged Simon Chapman who wrote an article challenging the anti- vaccination movement in Australia to ‘TAKE HIS OWN MEDICINE’
She began by saying
“On February 19, 1999, the Medical Observer published an article by Simon Chapman, in which he issued a challenge to the anti-vaccination movement in Australia.
My response to his provocative article is as follows:
If vaccines are such a blessing I challenge Simon Chapman to appear on television and allow himself to be injected with all baby vaccines, adjusted to his body weight by a doctor of my choice and in my presence.
The vaccines to be administered to Simon are as follows:
* DtaP: 3 doses within 4 months * OPV or IPV: 3 doses within 4 months
* Hib (any conjugates): 3 doses within 4 months
* Hep B: 3 doses within 1 month of each other.
The time of the first dose represents month 0.
There isn’t a better way to demonstrate to us that vaccines are safe and effective than by Simon taking his own medicine.“
Seems fair enough to me but as expected her letter was never answered.
Dr Scheibner has always had very strong views on vaccination and has been quoted making the following statements:-
“Vaccination procedures are a highly politically motivated non-science, whose practitioners are only interested in injecting multitudes of vaccines without much interest or care as to their effects. Data collection on reactions to vaccines is only paid lip service, and the obvious ineffectiveness of vaccines to prevent diseases is glossed over. The fact that natural infectious diseases have beneficial effect on the maturation and development of the immune system is ignored or deliberately suppressed. Consequently, parents of small children and any potential recipients of vaccines and any orthodox medications should be wary of any member of the medical establishment (which is little more than a highly politicised business system) extolling the non-existent virtues of vaccination.”–Viera Scheibner
“I did not find it difficult to conclude that there is no evidence whatsoever that vaccines or any kind are effective in preventing the infectious diseases they are supposed to prevent. Further, adverse effects are amply documented and are far more significant to public health than any adverse effects of infectious diseases. Immunizations not only did not prevent any infectious diseases, they caused more suffering and more deaths than has any other human activity in the entire history of medical intervention. It will be decades before the mopping-up after the disasters caused by childhood vaccination will be completed.”—Dr. Viera Scheibner, PhD
She is not the only doctor to hold such strong views. Dr Harold Buttram M.D holds similar views. He has said:-
“Safety studies on vaccinations are limited to short time periods only: several days to several weeks. There are NO (NONE) long term (months or years) safety studies on any vaccination or immunization. For this reason, there are valid grounds for suspecting that many delayed-type vaccine reactions may be taking place unrecognized at to their true nature.Dr Buttram MD
“As reported in a letter to the New England Journal of Medicine in 1984, tests of T-lymphocyte subpopulations were done on 11 healthy adults before-and-after routine tetanus booster immunizations. Tests showed a significant though temporary drop in T-helper lymphocytes (a class of white blood cells which helps govern the immune system) in all of the subjects. Special concern rests in the fact that in 4 of the subjects the T-helper cells fell to levels found in active AIDS patients. (2) If this was the result of a single vaccine in healthy adults, it is sobering to think of the consequences of the multiple vaccines (twenty-one at last count) routinely given to infants with their immature systems during the first six months of life. However, we can only speculate as to the consequences, as this test has never been repeated. Dr Buttram MD


