The New York Times has continued its role as the progenitor of propaganda for the state and its endless wars and interventions.

It did a bang up job during the invasion of Iraq when crack propagandist Judith Miller pawned off several neocon fantasies, most notably the claim Iraq was pursuing nuclear weapons. This Miller fable was used by Condoleezza Rice, Colin Powell, and Donald Rumsfeld to peddle the invasion. Miller also trotted out the fairy tale Saddam Hussein had chemical weapons. She characterized this lie as a “smoking gun” that made the invasion possible.

In an article underscoring the supposed urgency of a new intervention in Libya by the United States, the Times includes the following infographic:

The Times would have us believe weapons in Libya were “looted” and sold to Islamists in Syria and Mali.

First, many of these weapons were given to the “rebels” in Libya by NATO and the United States, an effort overseen by then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. This was confirmed by US intelligence in 2015. Other weapons purportedly came from Gaddafi’s arsenals.

“NATO has given permission to a number of weapons-loaded aircraft to land at Benghazi airport and some Tunisian airports,” an intelligence report states, according to a report published by The Washington Times. The weapons cache included tanks and surface-to-air missiles.

The Times also ignores the fact these weapons were funneled by a CIA “rat line” from Libya via southern Turkey and across the Syrian border to Gulf Emirate and Turkish supported proxies fighting to overthrow the government of Bashar al-Assad. Turkey continues to use this route to arm jihadists in Syria.

“A highly classified annex to the report, not made public, described a secret agreement reached in early 2012 between the Obama and Erdoğan administrations. It pertained to the rat line. By the terms of the agreement, funding came from Turkey, as well as Saudi Arabia and Qatar; the CIA, with the support of MI6, was responsible for getting arms from Gaddafi’s arsenals into Syria,” Seymour Hersh wrote for the London Review of Books on April 17, 2014.

The weapons controlled by the CIA and MI6 were also transferred to countries in West Africa and the Horn of Africa. “Illicit flows from the country are fueling existing conflicts in Africa and the Levant and enriching the arsenals of a range of non-state actors, including terrorist groups,” a UN Security Council report noted in April 2013.

The official narrative, pushed by the Council on Foreign Relations and the establishment, is that the war in Libya “unwittingly contributed to a security vacuum that allowed countless weapons to stream out of Libya and fuel insurgency, extremism, and crime in neighboring countries.”

An investigation conducted by The Small Arms Survey and Conflict Armament Research found that “fighters in Mali made extensive use of weapons originally from Libyan arsenals” following the downfall and murder of Muammar Gaddafi.

The influx of weapons in Mali resulted in the destabilization of that country’s government and turf wars between Islamist groups, principally Ansar Dine and the Movement for Oneness and Jihad in West Africa. In response France launched Operation Serval and intervened directly in Africa, thus providing a pretext by the European Union and Germany for military involvement in Africa.

In August 2013 Phil Greaves wrote

an extensive UN report from the Security Council group of experts, from April 2013, also highlights the rife lawless proliferation of arms throughout Libya, and seeping beyond its borders. The report stated that arms were fueling conflicts from Syria to Mali, and arms were spreading from Libya at an “alarming rate”. Qatar and the United Arab Emirates were singled out in the UN report for blatant violations of the arms embargo during the 2011 “uprising” against Gaddafi; the report revealed that multiple Qatari arms shipments had been allowed to flow into Libya with the full knowledge and acquiescence of NATO–in much the same way they have been allowed to flow into Turkey from Qatar, with Syria being the final destination.

The objective is obvious: weapons sent to Libya and subsequently “looted” from its arsenal are being used to fuel further terrorism and conflict by terror groups largely manufactured by intelligence agencies.

The game plan is to destabilize the Middle East and Africa as part of a larger order out of chaos agenda. In resource rich Africa the United States hopes to displace China and other competitors and establish military bases under the umbrella of Africom. Endless terror will be required to secure a foothold there.

Meanwhile it is up to The New York Times to sell us new and increasingly absurd rationales for never ending war and conflict.

Related Articles