Rumble CEO Chris Pavlovski has “emphatically” rejected the British Government’s request to demonetize comedian Russell Brand.
Pavloski issued his response after the UK Parliament sent him a letter expressing concerns that comedian Brand was profiting off the platform.
“Although it may be politically and socially easier for Rumble to join a cancel culture mob, doing so would be a violation of our company’s values and mission,” said Pavloski “We emphatically reject the U.K. Parliament’s demands.”
“We regard it as deeply inappropriate and dangerous that the UK Parliament would attempt to control who is allowed to speak on our platform or earn a living from doing so.”
In addition to inviting Rumble to “join YouTube in suspending Mr. Brand’s ability to earn money on the platform,” UK Parliament’s letter also asked what the video hosting service does to ensure creators don’t use the platform to “undermine the welfare of victims.”
Remember, Brand has only been accused of having abused and raped several people. As of this writing, there has been NO trial and NO criminal charges laid against Brand.
Attached is the letter from the UK Parliament. pic.twitter.com/MdeYrlt06J
— Rumble – $RUM (@rumblevideo) September 20, 2023
And in case you’re wondering why the system is going after Brand, look no further than the following excerpts of his work below:
“They came after Tucker, Alex Jones and now Russell Brand,” said one X user. “They speak too many truths and ask all the right questions.”
Notably, Alex Jones days ago released a statement rejecting the rape accusations against Brand and said the establishment is targeting the actor the same way they pursued him and other prominent figures who have challenged the establishment’s narrative.
Also, Auron MacIntyre of The Blaze laid bare what we are all witnessing:
“I have no idea if Brand is guilty but this is a clear message The ability to make money is not a default assumption of the free market but a privilege extended by the regime.
This is unlikely to be reversed even if Brand is proven innocent in the court of public opinion (whatever that means).
The hit pieces trigger extrajudicial TOS cancellations without recourse.
Kangaroo courts purposely assembled beyond the reach of the Constitution.”