Search
Search Results

No Search Results Found

LIVE
Search
Search Results

No Search Results Found

Explore HomeNewsPodcastsBreaking NewsSocial Watch Live Infowars NetworkThe Alex Jones ShowThe War Room with Owen ShroyerThe American Journal More Banned.VideoInfowars StoreArchiveRSSDownload Our App

Terms of Service

DMCA

Advertise with us

Affiliates

Media Inquiries

About

Politics

Conservatives Warn Alex Jones Show Trial Sets Precedent For Silencing Dissent Against Establishment

by Jamie White
August 3rd 2022, 5:21 pm
"Alex Jones precedent means if you don’t accept the Vegas shooting explanation, then FBI agents can sue you because you’re calling them liars by implication," says Mike Cernovich.
"A juror question from Alex Jones trial today: 'can we use lawsuits like these to stop election deniers?' See where this is going yet?" asks constitutional attorney Robert Barnes.
Image Credit:
Sergio Flores /For Hearst Connecticut Media
Share

Conservatives and legal experts are warning that the ongoing show trial against Alex Jones is meant to set the precedent to shut down any opinions or commentary that counters establishment narratives.

Revolver News founder Darrin J. Beattie, constitutional lawyer Robert Barnes, lawyer Mike Cernovich, Human Events editor Jack Posobiec, and others all warned that the Texas defamation trial against Jones is the first legal salvo against free speech and dissenting views.

“Regime is thirsting for a precedent in Alex Jones case so no one can question official narratives on the internet again,” Beattie tweeted Wednesday.

“Alex Jones precedent means if you don’t accept the Vegas shooting explanation, then FBI agents can sue you because you’re calling them liars by implication,” Cernovich noted. “Conservative media doesn’t seem to care. They aren’t saying a word on the due process violations in Jones case.”

“The Alex Jones show trial is a preview of what the regime intends to do to anyone and everyone who doesn’t conform with The Narratives,” journalist Jordan Schachtel said.

“Alex Jones case is to use it as precedent to go after those who contest 2020 election & any other government disfavored ‘conspiracy minded’ folks, like everyone who challenged lockdowns, mandates, Covid origins, lies to get us into war,” Barnes pointed out after noting a juror asked the court if the lawsuit against Jones can “stop election deniers” in future cases.

In fact, the New York Times this week confirmed the alarming hypothesis, admitting that the establishment’s goal is to “send a signal to other conspiracy purveyors about the cost of online lies” using the legal system.

Keep in mind, the NYT didn’t consider the Russia collusion hoax, Jussie Smollett’s hate crime hoax, the Nick Sandmann incident, the Kyle Rittenhouse case, or Hunter Biden’s laptop as “Russian disinformation” to be media-driven lies at all — though all of them demonstrably were at the time.

A verdict in Jones’ Texas defamation show trial is expected later this week.


Twitter: @WhiteIsTheFury
Truth Social: @WhiteIsTheFury
Gettr: @WhiteIsTheFury
Gab: @WhiteIsTheFury
Minds: @WhiteIsTheFury

To learn more about the Great Reset - and to help fund our operation - please pre-order Alex Jones' book The Great Reset & The War for the World. You can also get an autographed copy!
Share
LIVE

In case you missed it...
Politics

Politics

‘Bulls**t!’: Megyn Kelly Goes Ballistic Over FBI’s Raid Against Trump, Says ‘It’s About Jan. 6’

posted 18 hours ago

Politics

Tulsi Gabbard: FBI Raid Against Trump a ‘Blatant Abuse of Power’

posted a day ago

Politics

Trump Suggests FBI May Have ‘Planted’ Evidence To Frame Him During Mar-a-Lago Raid

posted a day ago

Politics

Former Twitter Employee Found Guilty of Spying for Saudi Arabia

posted a day ago

View More From Politics
Terms of ServiceDMCAAdvertise with usAffiliatesMedia InquiriesAbout