A piece of legislation introduced in New Jersey seeks to censor and penalize doctors who ‘disseminate misinformation’. If passed, healthcare workers who ‘disseminate misinformation’ can face professional misconduct charges from occupational licensing boards, with the nature of the punishments being determined by said boards.
The bill defines ‘misinformation’ as something that is ‘contradicted by contemporary scientific consensus’. It should be noted that, according to the ‘contemporary scientific consensus’, Dr. Tony Fauci IS the science.
“This bill establishes the act of disseminating misinformation or disinformation by a health care professional as an act of professional misconduct subject to disciplinary action. It is the sponsor’s intent that this legislation will help combat health misinformation and curb the spread of falsehoods that threaten the health and safety of New Jersey residents,” the bill said. “The bill defines ‘disseminate’ to mean the conveyance of information, in the form of treatment or advice, from a health care professional to a patient under the health care professional’s care. ‘Misinformation’ means any health-related claim of fact that is false and contradicted by contemporary scientific consensus contrary to the standard of care. ‘Disinformation’ means misinformation that is deliberately disseminated with malicious intent or an intent to mislead.”
The bill was called a ‘grave danger to medical freedom‘ by the McCullough Foundation on Tuesday.
JUST IN – New Jersey Advances Legislation to Censor and Penalize Doctors for "Disseminating Misinformation"
— McCullough Foundation (@McCulloughFund) September 24, 2024
The bill states, "A health care professional who engages in the dissemination of misinformation or disinformation shall be deemed to have engaged in professional… pic.twitter.com/eMSyIFoUuL
“The bill is meant to combat rising misinformation in the health care space following the pandemic, said bill sponsor Assemblyman Herb Conaway (D-Burlington),” the New Jersey Monitor said Monday.
One critic pointed out that under the bill, ‘independence in women’ would be seen as a psychological disorder if the bill were to have been enacted in 1860, showing that the ‘consensus’ in medicine is continually changing and therefor should not be legislated into a legal requirement.
“Renee Kohanski, a Somerset County psychiatrist representing the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, a conservative nonprofit that backed hydroxychloroquine as a treatment for COVID-19, pointed to beliefs in bygone eras that included pathologizing independence in women, noting the case of Elizabeth Packard, whose husband wrongly committed her to an insane asylum in 1860,” the New Jersey Monitor said Monday.
Undoubtedly the law targets those who do not wish to take vaccines.
“A range of anti-vaccine activists opposed the bill before the committee, alleging it would stifle doctors’ ability to treat patients,” the New Jersey Monitor said Monday.
The one-size-fits-all approach to medicine, decreed by the United Nation’s (U.N.) World Health Organization (WHO), then passed down to the national-level agencies such as the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH), then adopted by state agencies and finally medical facilities is likely the only protocols doctors can verbally promote under this legislation.
While treating every human on Earth’s health with a single set of protocols sounds globalistic in nature, the WHO goes a step further with their ‘One Health‘ agenda that ‘balances and optimizes’ the health of people, animals and ecosystems. In other words, everyone on earth will have animals and ecosystems considered in their health decisions, leading to the risk of overpopulation being factored into healthcare decisions.
California had passed a similar law, which it then repealed in 2023.
Tucker Carlson Says We Are Commanded To Hope In Powerful Interview With Alex Jones