Salon shows its true class warfare colors in the wake of the Boston Marathon bombing

Kurt Nimmo
April 17, 2013

Salon’s support for Obama’s socialist agenda is predicated on the myth of white domestic terror. Photo: Un-Fair Campaign.

On Tuesday evening, the “progressive” website Salon posted an article by Democrat operative David Sirota. In the article, Sirota writes that “the dynamics of [white] privilege will undoubtedly influence the nation’s collective reaction to the attacks.” He explains that supposed white terrorists like Timothy McVeigh are invariably lone wolves while Arab terrorists like Osama bin Laden represent “existential threats” because they are Islamic outsiders.

For Sirota, the entire liberal-socialist agenda hangs in the balance. If “you care about everything from stopping war to reducing the defense budget to protecting civil liberties to passing immigration reform, you should hope the bomber was a white domestic terrorist,” he writes. “Why? Because only in that case will privilege work to prevent the Boston attack from potentially undermining progress on those other issues.”

Next Sirota references his SPLC crib notes. “However, white male privilege means white men are not collectively denigrated/targeted for those shootings – even though most come at the hands of white dudes.”

Check out the link above. It lands on Crooks and Liars where the liberal scaremonger David Neiwert allegedly details “a fresh onset of domestic terrorism from the extremist American Right.” Naturally, most of these scary people hail from the infinitesimally tiny – and government infiltrated – white supremacist fringe. They share virtually nothing with the larger and more politically active patriot and constitutionalist movements.

Sirota and Neiwert are prime examples of the liberal delusion on steroids. Despite a scary letter sent to Eric Holder and Janet Napolitano by a desperate SPLC – eager to stay relevant and maintain its footing at the feeding trough – there is no imminent Oklahoma City Bombing version 2 percolating below the surface, at least not by the likes of the Oath Keepers, the Constitution Party and other groups and individuals, including Alex Jones, demonized by the SPLC propaganda machine.

As we have noted ad nauseam, the FBI specializes in fabricating terror attacks. Even liberal bastions like the New York Times and Mother Jones admit to this truth, but it is apparently beyond the reach of Sirota, Neiwert and the Obama entranced liberals desperate to make all terror the product of evil blue-eyed devils.

Finally, there is ample evidence – routinely and habitually ignored by the liberal and corporate media – that both Osama bin Laden and Timothy McVeigh were intelligence assets. Osama bin Laden’s relationship with the CIA is well-documented while the fact McVeigh was an FBI patsy is less well-known but out there for all to see. For more on this, see our article The McVeigh Tapes: A Fairy Tale Designed to Demonize the Patriot Movement.

Related Articles