The White House has appointed its first openly transgendered staff member.
The Obama administration announced it hired transgender activist Raffi Freedman-Gurspan as the new Outreach and Recruitment Director for the Office of Personnel on Tuesday.
“Her commitment to bettering the lives of transgender Americans, particularly transgender people of color and those in poverty, reflects the values of this administration,” Obama’s senior advisor Valerie Jarrett said, adding that Gurspan’s appointment “demonstrates the kind of leadership this administration champions.”
The White House claims the hiring is part of Obama’s effort to advance “gender-minority rights,” but in reality the Obama administration is hijacking the LGBT movement to break up the nuclear-family model to encourage individuals to be more supportive – and dependent – on the government.
Think about it this way: people generally hold more allegiance to their own families than they do to politicians, and, as government grows at the expense of individual liberties, politicians have to compensate for that by scamming the public into submission.
But how do they do that? By encouraging the public to feel a deeper connection to political figures, such as Obama for example, than their own families.
And because many in the LGBT community are unfortunately shunned by their closest relatives, it’s easy for Obama to exploit them for his dystopian agenda that has little to do with genuine concerns about gay rights.
“All their ties with the past — friends, family, traditional decencies and pieties — have been severed,” establishment insider Aldous Huxley said about such an exploited public in his essay Brave New World Revisited. “They are new men [and women], re-created in the image of their new god [the government] and totally dedicated to his service.”
Interestingly, in his 1932 novel Brave New World, Huxley anticipated a future society that is centrally controlled by a powerful government through the use of various techniques such as the destruction of the family, which is precisely what’s going on today.
“As political and economic freedom diminishes, sexual freedom tends compensatingly to increase,” he wrote. “And the dictator … will do well to encourage that freedom.”
“In conjunction with the freedom to daydream under the influence of dope and movies and the radio, it will help to reconcile his subjects to the servitude which is their fate.”