An alarming lecture on the military applications of neurotechnology and how nano-particulate smart dust can be “scattered” to cause stroke epidemics has gone viral.
In his 2017 lecture, Georgetown University’s Chief of the Neuroethics Studies Program Dr. James Giordano warned that even if the released nano-particles don’t cause a stroke they can still achieve long-term disruption of brain function in “increasingly concentric circles of expansion.”
“So what we’re able to do here is infiltrate the brain space with nano-particulate matter that aggregates in situ (on-site) in the brain and there’s one of two things,” said Giordano. “Either penetrates from the vascular space, gets into the bloodstream, gets in through the nose, through the mucosa, or infiltrates the vascular space and clogs it. What is the result?”
“It’s what’s called a nano-particulate stroke or a hemorrhagic diathesis (fancy word, it’s a predisposition for individuals having brain bleeds).”
WATCH:
“If we can do it, what makes us think anyone else can’t?” Asked Giordano. “The point I want to drive through is, they can. And in some cases, they can do it a lot better than we can for a variety of reasons.”
Be sure to watch Giordano’s full lecture on “Neurotechnology in National Security and Defense” below:
Giordano’s mention of successful animal testing brings to mind a 2021 Telegraph report that exposed how Wuhan & U.S. scientists planned to release coronavirus particles into cave bats.
New documents show that just 18 months before the first Covid-19 cases appeared, researchers had submitted plans to release skin-penetrating nanoparticles and aerosols containing “novel chimeric spike proteins” of bat coronaviruses into cave bats in Yunnan, China.
They also planned to create chimeric viruses, genetically enhanced to infect humans more easily, and requested $14million from the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (Darpa) to fund the work.
The Telegraph goes on to detail how the leaked grant proposals dating from 2018 were received by officials and the scientific community.
Papers, confirmed as genuine by a former member of the Trump administration, show they were hoping to introduce “human-specific cleavage sites” to bat coronaviruses which would make it easier for the virus to enter human cells.
When Covid-19 was first genetically sequenced, scientists were puzzled about how the virus had evolved such a human-specific adaptation at the cleavage site on the spike protein, which is the reason it is so infectious.
The documents were released by Drastic, the web-based investigations team set up by scientists from across the world to look into the origins of Covid-19.
In a statement, Drastic said: “Given that we find in this proposal a discussion of the planned introduction of human-specific cleavage sites, a review by the wider scientific community of the plausibility of artificial insertion is warranted.”
The proposal also included plans to mix high-risk natural coronavirus strains with more infectious but less dangerous varieties.
The bid was submitted by British zoologist Peter Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance, the US-based organization, which has worked closely with the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) researching bat coronaviruses.
Team members included Dr. Shi Zhengli (WIV researcher popularly known as “Bat Woman”), as well as US researchers from the University of North Carolina & the United States Geological Survey National Wildlife Health Center.
The Telegraph said Darpa refused to fund the work, adding it would “put local communities at risk,” and experts slammed Daszak:
Darpa refused to fund the work, saying: “It is clear that the proposed project led by Peter Daszak could have put local communities at risk”, and warned that the team had not properly considered the dangers of enhancing the virus (gain of function research) or releasing a vaccine by air...
Viscount Ridley, who has co-authored a book on the origin of Covid-19, due for release in November, and who has frequently called for a further investigation into what caused the pandemic in the House of Lords, said: “For more than a year I tried repeatedly to ask questions of Peter Daszak with no response.“
“Now it turns out he had authored this vital piece of information about virus work in Wuhan but refused to share it with the world. I am furious. So should the world be.“
“Peter Daszak and the EcoHealth Alliance (EHA) proposed injecting deadly chimeric bat coronaviruses collected by the Wuhan Institute of Virology into humanized and ‘batified’ mice, and much, much more.”
Interestingly, The Telegraph quotes Professor Angus Dalgleish, who warns the gain of function research may have continued even without the funding:
Angus Dalgleish, Professor of Oncology at St Georges, University of London, who struggled to get work published showing that the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) had been carrying out “gain of function” work for years before the pandemic, said the research may have gone ahead even without the funding.
“This is clearly a gain of function, engineering the cleavage site and polishing the new viruses to enhance human cell infectibility in more than one cell line,” he said.