Skip to content

UN Claims a ‘Need For Global Governance’ to Control AI — Document

One key theme of the document is the repeated claim that A.I. must be brought in line with the U.N.'s sustainable development goals (SDG). This is echoed throughout the text.

The document proposes a 'global fund for A.I.' which pools research from entities including global vaccine organizations.

UN Claims a ‘Need For Global Governance’ to Control AI — Document Image Credit: Xinhua News Agency / Contributor / Getty
SHARE
LIVE
gab

The United Nations (U.N.) ‘High-level Advisory Body on Artificial Intelligence’ published ‘Governing AI for Humanity‘ in September. It calls for global government control in the face of recent developments in artificial intelligence (A.I.).

Note this document should not be confused with another U.N. document, ‘The Pact for the Future, Global Digital Compact & Declaration on Future Generations‘, also published in September and reported on by Infowars.

The document detailed the U.N.’s stance on A.I., including the need for global governance, gaps in global governance as it relates to A.I., enhancing global cooperation and a call to action in it’s 99 pages. It summarizes its claims as to the necessity of globalism early on before expounding on it more in Chapter 2 ‘The need for global governance’ on page 37.

“The imperative of global governance, in particular, is irrefutable,” Governing AI for Humanity said on page 7. “There is, today, a global governance deficit with respect to AI.”

The document states that A.I. is not understood by anyone and that no one is accountable for it.

“Moreover, no one currently understands all of AI’s inner workings enough to fully control its outputs or predict its evolution. Nor are decision makers held accountable for developing, deploying or using systems they do not understand. Meanwhile, negative spillovers and downstream impacts resulting from such decisions are also likely to be global,” Governing AI for Humanity said on page 7.

The document goes on to say that the private sector cannot be allowed to regulate it, nor even national governments themselves. Rather, a global government must now have control.

“The development, deployment and use of such a technology cannot be left to the whims of markets alone. National governments and regional organizations will be crucial, but the very nature of the technology itself – transboundary in structure and application – necessitates a global approach. Governance can also be a key enabler for AI innovation for the SDGs globally,” Governing AI for Humanity said on page 7.

One key theme of the document is the repeated claim that A.I. must be brought in line with the U.N.’s sustainable development goals (SDG). This is echoed throughout the text.

Furthermore, the document calls for global A.I. ‘governance regimes’ which must have control over the entire planet.

“AI governance regimes must also span the globe to be effective — effective in averting ‘AI arms races’ or a ‘race to the bottom’ on safety and rights, in detecting and responding to incidents emanating from decisions along AI’s life cycle which span multiple jurisdictions, in spurring learning, in encouraging interoperability, and in sharing AI’s benefits. The technology is borderless and, as it spreads, the illusion that any one State or group of States could (or should) control it will diminish,” Governing AI for Humanity said on page 8.

The form of global government the U.N. document claims is needed for this technology will be based on the current philosophies of the world organization. Philosophies which were summed up in another document from September that also pushes for global government in all areas of life, not just A.I.

Page 40 has a chart that documents some of the current international efforts to regulate A.I. – all seeming to be not enough, given the current document claiming a further necessity of world government. It lists these ‘gaps’ in A.I. governance on page 42.

The document proposes a ‘global fund for A.I.’ which pools research from entities including global vaccine organizations.

“The fund’s operating model should be informed by lessons from pooled international research and development collaborations, such as CERN and Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance, as well as lessons from commercial platforms for timeshared infrastructure,” Governing AI for Humanity said on page 67.

Chapter 5 on page 77-78 ‘Conclusion: a call to action’ personalizes the global government agenda to the reader by using humanizing terms that evoke an emotional response.

It should be emphasized that this document was compiled by the U.N.’s ‘High-level Advisory Body on Artificial Intelligence’. More information on this board was given on page 80.

“The High-level Advisory Body on Artificial Intelligence, convened by the United Nations Secretary-General, will undertake analysis and advance recommendations for the international governance of artificial intelligence. The Body’s initial reports will provide high-level expert and independent contributions to ongoing national, regional, and multilateral debates.,” Governing AI for Humanity said on page 80. “The Body will consist of 38 members from governments, private sector, civil society, and academia, as well as a member Secretary. Its composition will be balanced by gender, age, geographic representation, and area of expertise related to the risks and applications of artificial intelligence. The members of the Body will serve in their personal capacity.”


Alex Jones Sets The Record Straight With InfoWars Auction


Get 40% OFF our fan-favorite drink mix Vitamin Mineral Fusion NOW at the Infowars Store!
SHARE
LIVE
gab